ArticlePDF Available

Greenhouses in extreme environments: The Arthur Clarke Mars Greenhouse design and operation overview


Abstract and Figures

Since its deployment on Devon Island, Canadian High Arctic, in 2002, the Haughton Mars Project’s Arthur Clarke Mars Greenhouse (ACMG) has supported extreme environment related scientific and operation research that is relevant to Mars analogue studies – each at a specific level of fidelity and complexity. The Greenhouse serves as an initial experimental test-bed supporting field research, from which lessons may be learned to support the design and implementation of future field facilities, and enabling higher fidelity demonstrations. This paper provides an overall description of the ACMG, describes the different subsystems, explains its operational modes, details some results over the three years of operation and discusses future development plans.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Greenhouses in extreme environments: The Arthur Clarke
Mars Greenhouse design and operation overview
Richard Giroux
, Alain Berinstain
, Stephen Braham
, Thomas Graham
Matthew Bamsey
, Keegan Boyd
, Matthew Silver
, Alexis Lussier-Desbiens
, Pascal Lee
Marc Boucher
, Keith Cowing
, Michael Dixon
Canadian Space Agency, Space Science, 6767 route de l’aeroport, St-Hubert, Que., Canada J3Y 8Y9
PolyLAB, 515 West Hastings Street, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6B 5K3
University of Guelph, Dept. of Environmental Biology, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ont., Canada N1G 2W1
Mars Institute, SETI Institute, and NASA Ames Research Center, MS 245-3, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
SpaceRef Interactive Inc., P.O. Box 3569, Reston, VA 20195-1569, USA
Received 15 November 2005; received in revised form 14 June 2006; accepted 2 July 2006
Since its deployment on Devon Island, Canadian High Arctic, in 2002, the Haughton Mars Project’s Arthur Clarke Mars Greenhouse
(ACMG) has supported extreme environment related scientific and operation research that is relevant to Mars analogue studies – each at
a specific level of fidelity and complexity. The Greenhouse serves as an initial experimental test-bed supporting field research, from which
lessons may be learned to support the design and implementation of future field facilities, and enabling higher fidelity demonstrations.
This paper provides an overall description of the ACMG, describes the different subsystems, explains its operational modes, details some
results over the three years of operation and discusses future development plans.
Crown copyright 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of COSPAR. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Greenhouse; Autonomous operation; Extreme environment; Space analog studies
1. Introduction
Long-duration space exploration missions will include
plant production as a key component of a biologically
regenerative life-support system designed to meet crew
nutritional requirements while cleaning water and main-
taining a suitable atmospheric composition. In this context,
advanced life support systems, based on bio-regenerative
principles, have emerged as an important area of research
in the space sciences. One of the areas of particular interest
is the study of crop behavior under novel environmental
conditions (pressure, gas composition, etc.) that typically
fall outside of the normal conditions under which the spe-
cies developed. In addition to the plant physiology research
interests, there are also many operational aspects of plant
growth and climate control in extreme environments that
require research attention. Luckily, many of these research
objectives can be studied here on Earth.
In 2002, the Haughton Mars Project (HMP) established
the Arthur Clarke Mars Greenhouse (ACMG) as an exper-
imental field research facility at the HMP Research Station
site at 75260N, 8952 0W, on the northwestern rim of
Haughton Crater, Devon Island, Nunavut, Canadian High
Arctic. Construction and inaugural operation of the
ACMG involved the participation of researchers at the
Canadian Space Agency (CSA) along with other HMP
partners from NASA, industry and academia in Canada
and the United States (see Fig. 1). Each summer, this moon
and Mars analogue site brings together researchers from
around the world with diverse research interests such as
geology, astrobiology and space exploration technology,
0273-1177/$30 Crown copyright 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of COSPAR. All rights reserved.
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: (A. Berinstain).
Advances in Space Research 38 (2006) 1248–1259
to name only a few. Where Devon Island is also useful
from an analogue perspective is its utility as an operational
model for a remote field research station.
Advanced life support systems have been, and continue
to be studied by the major space agencies. Among these
are, ESA, which initiated the MELiSSA project in 1989
(Lasseur et al., 2005) and NASA which has been develop-
ing bioregenerative capabilities since the early 1980s
(Wheeler et al., 2001). Also, the Russian space program
had its series of Bios experiments (Bartsev et al., 1996;
Salisbury et al., 1997) performed by the Biophysics Insti-
tute. Recent proposals for long-term exploration missions
by NASA and ESA have been a great catalyst for advanc-
ing research in this area from a diverse spectrum of contrib-
utors. The results of this advancement has been the
development of many feasible concepts for space green-
houses (Bucklin et al., 2001; Perino et al., 2002; Scaras-
cia-Mugnozza and Schettini, 2002; Clawson et al., 2005;
Janssen et al., 2005).
Another fruitful area of research concerns the study of
the effect of the space environment on plant morphology
and physiology, especially the reduced pressure conditions
that will be predominant in early Mars greenhouse settings
(Andre and Massimino, 1992; Goto et al., 1995; Rygalov
et al., 2002; Dixon et al., 2005). It is important that we
understand the behaviour of plants growing under these
unique conditions to ensure a reliable and responsive life
support system.
Greenhouses have also been investigated as a part of
advanced life support systems for planetary outposts
(Wheeler and Martin-Brennan, 2000). A popular mode
for investigating the aforementioned research areas is
through the exploitation of analogue systems. The most
well-known greenhouse based bioregenerative life-support
analogue is the Biosphere II experiment (Allen, 1992),
but smaller life-support test facilities have also been based
on greenhouse environments (Drysdale and Collins, 2005).
These experiments focus on large-scale closed-ecology sys-
tems and help understand the complexity of such an
The ACMG is not a full-featured, high fidelity simula-
tion of a greenhouse to be established on Mars. Rather,
as is the case of most analogue studies being conducted
on Devon Island, it supports scientific and operations
research in an operational setting that is relevant to Mars
in unique ways – each at a specific level of fidelity and
The current research goal of the ACMG (specific goals
updated annually) is to develop an autonomous and
remotely monitored greenhouse operating continuously in
the harsh environment of the Canadian High Arctic. This
project is unique in the world: no one has ever built and
remotely operated a greenhouse in an extreme environment
like the polar desert of the Canadian High Arctic. It
addresses many Mars-like challenges, including: short win-
dow of operation to conduct maintenance and overhaul,
extreme environment for plant growth, limited electrical
power production and heat generation, and low-bandwidth
communication for remote monitoring and control.
This paper first describes the greenhouse structure and
systems. The operational modes of the greenhouse are then
addressed and an example of year-round operation is
detailed. Selected results from the first few years of opera-
tion are presented and discussed in the following section.
Finally, future developments and new research endeavors
conclude the paper.
2. System description
The greenhouse is composed of many systems, namely
the physical structure, the plant growth system, the envi-
ronment control system, the power system, the communi-
cation system, and finally, the data acquisition and
control system. The latter acts as the nexus for all the inter-
actions among the systems. Fig. 2 shows the high level
architecture of the systems and their interactions.
The arrows indicate information flow. Each system, as it
currently exists, is described in the following subsections.
Fig. 1. Map showing location of Devon Island, Nunavut, Canada.
Fig. 2. High level architecture of greenhouse systems.
R. Giroux et al. / Advances in Space Research 38 (2006) 1248–1259 1249
The evolution of the greenhouse systems is discussed in the
discussion section of the paper.
2.1. Structure
The structure of the greenhouse is based on the commer-
cial ‘‘Garden Grower Hobby Kit’’ [http://www. igcusa.
com/hobby-greenhouse-garden-grower.html]. The dimen-
sions are 3.6 m ·7.2 m ·3 m, with the long end aligned
east to west to maximize sun exposure. The cover is made
of 6 mm Twinwall Lexan polycarbonate sheets, with a
R-value of 1.55, supported by 1.2 m spaced steel struts
complying with a 163 kg/m
live load specification and
resisting up to 144 km/h wind speeds. A porch (1.3 m wide)
on the east end has been installed to facilitate access to the
greenhouse while reducing energy losses through the main
greenhouse door by acting as an air buffer.
2.2. Network, communication, and telemetry
The greenhouse has a local Ethernet network that links
different components through an EISX9-100T CTRLink
Ethernet hub. An embedded computer based on a
400 MHz ARM processor, 64 MB RAM, 64 MB Flash
and running embedded linux manages the network and
exchanges the information between the outside world and
the data acquisition system. The computer has 2 Ethernet
ports and 4 serial ports. Communication with other parts
of GH is via Ethernet and IP protocols. An SDX-1100
modem (serial communication) uses the MSAT satellite
to transmit data south, while commands can also be sent
Fig. 3 shows the ACMG components of the communi-
cation infrastructure. Transmission is file-based in both
directions. The embedded computer collects the data gath-
ered by the data acquisition and control (DAQ& CTRL)
system. A UNIX (Solaris) workstation at the operations
center at Simon Fraser University (SFU) controls the com-
munication, providing autonomous fetching of data from
the embedded computer, and can command the packet
satellite terminal in the greenhouse to reboot the DAQ &
CTRL system when it detects failure conditions. Upon
reception of data, and as represented in Fig. 4, the informa-
tion is processed and stored, and then made available to the
researchers through the Internet.
Also, the operations center can send commands to the
data acquisition and control (DAQ & CTRL) system to
modify the mode of operation. These different modes of
operation will be described in the operation section of this
2.3. Data acquisition and control
The data acquisition is performed by a National Instru-
ments Field Point controller (FP-2015) and distributed I/O
(two AI-100 analog input modules, four TC-120 thermo-
couple input modules, one DI-330 digital input module
and two RLY-420 relay modules). Using 512 MB non-vol-
atile storage and 32 MB of RAM, the controller is able to
manage up to nine I/O modules, has one RS232 serial port
and is accessible through an Ethernet port.
The DAQ & CTRL modules are dedicated to acquiring
sensors data and to triggering the actuators that will be
mentioned in the following subsections. Fig. 5 depicts the
interactions between the acquisition modules and the con-
troller. The analog inputs include DC voltage inputs and
thermocouple element inputs. Discrete inputs are used to
sense the state of operation and relays are designed to trig-
ger actions of different systems. The RS232 port of the con-
troller acquires the weather station data.
The main control loop operates at a frequency of 5 s
per cycle. The numerical average of each data point is
logged every 10 min and is appended to a continuous
global archive file on the FP-2015 controller flash memo-
ry. In addition to writing this data line to the continuous-
ly growing main log file, the data is written to three other
files: the first is a single log file that only contains the
information from the last 10-min log, the second is a 2-
h file that only contains the most recent 2 h of log infor-
mation, and the third contains the most recent 24 h of
logging information. The data acquisition archiving
scheme is depicted in Fig. 6. Under normal operations,
approximately every two hours, the autonomous systems
at the operations center send a request via the embedded
Fig. 3. Greenhouse network and communication system.
Fig. 4. Operations center (SFU) communication system and data
1250 R. Giroux et al. / Advances in Space Research 38 (2006) 1248–1259
computer over the satellite link for a 2-h data file. The
embedded computer requests the 2-h file from the FP-
2015, and sends over the satellite link. The embedded
computer also automatically fetches a backup 24-h data
file from the FP-2015. In case of communication outages,
a real-time 24-h file is autonomously requested by the
operations center in order to fill in any gaps of data that
may have been created. It is also possible to request the
backup 24-h files, which are stored permanently in the
embedded computer’s storage, after periods of extended
communication loss. Ten minute real-time data may also
be fetched on-demand by the operations center, as can
embedded-computer housekeeping and status data files.
2.4. Plant growth
The core of the plant growth system is a drip-line system
(American AgriTech 8 tray Jetstream) similar to the one
shown in Fig. 7. This system allows for reduced reservoir
volumes and a potentially lower power consumption
depending on irrigation settings compared to an ebb and
flow system. The plants are grown in rockwool slabs and
are watered every hour for a specific duration. As for all
drip-line systems, the excess water is drained back into
the reservoir.
A Flojet Quad II diaphragm pump (model 4306 series) is
used to feed the drip lines and is activated by the controller.
A Plant Products 20-20-20 (with micronutrients) general
purpose fertilizer is used to prepare the nutrient solution
(approximately 100 mg/L total N). Presently, the nutrient
solution composition is monitored via HI2910B/5 pH sen-
sors and HI3001 electrical conductivity (EC) measure-
ments, supplied by Hanna Instruments. These parameters
are monitored; however, solution maintenance systems
(i.e., Nutrient injection pumps, acid and base injectors) have
not yet been deployed or incorporated into the power bud-
get. The solution temperature is also monitored for opera-
tional reasons that will be explained later in the paper.
The greenhouse has two distinct growth trays to accom-
modate dual operational requirements (to be discussed in a
later section): one for the fall crop season and another for
the spring crop season. The crop growth process is moni-
tored by two StarDot Technologies NetCamcameras
that provide daily or on-demand pictures to qualitatively
evaluate growth progress. Fig. 8 summarizes the plant sys-
tem components.
2.5. Environment control system
The environment control system of the greenhouse is of
major importance due to the extreme climate of the green-
house location. At this stage of the project, only the tem-
perature is controlled, and this is done through the use of
heaters and exhaust fans. However, other environmental
parameters are logged for comparative analysis.
Fig. 7. American AgriTech Jetstream growth tray.
Fig. 6. Data acquisition archiving.
Fig. 5. Data acquisition and control.
R. Giroux et al. / Advances in Space Research 38 (2006) 1248–1259 1251
2.5.1. Sensors
Table 1 shows the different sensors used in the green-
house for the environmental monitoring.
Only the temperature sensors (type Tthermocouples) in
the vicinity of the crops provide feedback to the climate
control algorithm. The other thermocouples are used to
monitor the general climate of the greenhouse in addition
to the outside temperature. Two custom sensors (Tand
RH sensors), developed at the University of Guelph, mea-
sure the temperature and relative humidity inside the
greenhouse. They both use RS232 protocol to transmit
their data. Because of the limitation of RS232 ports on
the NI controller at hand, the embedded computer is used
to gather the custom sensor data. The data are then read by
the FP-2015 via the local Ethernet network.
The quantum sensors (model QSO-SUN), the pyranom-
eter sensors (model PYR) and the ultra-violet sensors
(model UVS) from Apogee Instruments indicate the level
of solar radiation in different wavelength bands. Also, a
customized PORTLOG-M weather station from RainWise
monitors the outdoor climate parameters that influence the
greenhouse interior climate. Finally, an external webcam
(StarDot Technologies NetCam) provides a general out-
look of the weather and the structural integrity of the
greenhouse. Fig. 9 summarizes the sensor architecture of
the greenhouse.
2.5.2. Actuators
There are three main actuators in the temperature con-
trol system: the heaters, the circulation fans and the
exhaust fans, as illustrated at Fig. 10.
The three heaters are equally spaced along the northern
wall. Each of them is a commercial non-vented open flame
propane greenhouse heater, delivering 21.1 MJ (20 000
BTU) each (model C1-200SR from Southern Burner
Co.). Twelve 86 kg (190 lbs) standard LP tanks supply pro-
pane to the heaters. The tanks are located outside along the
north end of the greenhouse. Each tank is filled with 45 kg
(100 lbs) of propane.
In addition to heat-induced movement fans on top of
each heater, two 220 L/s (466 CFM) Schaefer circulation
fans are installed allowing equal distribution of the heat
in the greenhouse. To cool down the greenhouse, two
30.5 cm (12 in.) exhaust fans are situated on the upper part
of the west wall. At an exhaust capacity of approximately
377.5 L/s (800 CFM) each, they are used when the inside
temperature reaches a predetermined threshold.
2.5.3. Climate control
The climate control system currently comprises of only
basic greenhouse temperature control within the limits of
Table 1
Sensor suite
Parameter Sensor
Humidity Relative humidity sensor
Temperature Thermocouple
300 to 1100 nm Pyranometer
400 to 700 nm Quantum sensor
250 to 400 nm UV sensor
Weather station
Temperature Thermometer
Relative humidity RH sensor
Wind speed Anemometer
Wind direction Wind vane
Barometric pressure Barometer
Solar radiation Pyranometer
Outside picture Webcam
Fig. 8. Plant system components and interactions.
Fig. 9. Environment control system sensing elements.
Fig. 10. Environment control system actuators.
1252 R. Giroux et al. / Advances in Space Research 38 (2006) 1248–1259
the previously described actuators. Fig. 11 depicts the con-
trol logic, where the X-axis represents the temperature
above the canopy and the state sequence of the temperature
control is determined by a virtual dot following the
arrowed hysteresis curve given a temperature variation.
Given a desired minimum temperature, the heaters are trig-
gered on at a temperature above that minimum to account
for heat transfer inertia. During heating events, only two
heaters are turned on at a time and the three pairs of heat-
ers are cycled in a predetermined sequence. Following a
hysteresis control strategy, the heaters are shut off at a tem-
perature slightly higher than the one at which they were ini-
tially turned on.
As for the cooling strategy, the exhaust fans are turned
on before the temperature reaches the maximum setpoint.
Both fans are always turned on at the same time. Although
they are very power consuming, they are only needed dur-
ing high solar radiance, which in turn implies high power
output from the solar panels. The fan control also follows
a hysteresis control scheme.
The circulation fans can be actuated by two modes: con-
tinuous or periodic operations. The continuous operation
allows the fans to operate unless they are manually turned
off. This mode is activated by a direct command from the
operations center and is used only occasionally. The peri-
odic operational is the nominal operation mode and
requires a frequency and duration input. The nominal set-
tings for this mode are periods of 15 min for a 5-min acti-
vation timeframe (duty cycle of 33%).
2.6. Power system
Since the greenhouse is located where there is no infra-
structure, electrical power is provided by a hybrid solar-
wind system. In addition to wind-power generators and
solar panels, the system is composed of charge controllers,
a battery bank, a load dump, a line switch logic and distri-
bution lines. Fig. 12 illustrates each component of the sys-
tem and their interconnections. The power system is
intentionally isolated (not controlled) from the DAQ &
CTRL system to allow robustness and continuous opera-
tion even in the case of a computer failure. However, power
production and consumption are monitored.
2.6.1. Power production, storage, and charge control
The system has two separate lines of power production,
each of which contains three solar panels, one wind gener-
ator and one charge/load controller. The two power pro-
duction lines feed the same battery bank. The relevant
technical information of the production system is summa-
rized in Table 2.
The Xantrex C60 charge/load controllers manage the
power to and from the battery bank. Fig. 13 represents
the control logic of the charging sequence, where the X-axis
represents the main bus voltage and the state sequence of
the charge logic control is determined by a virtual dot fol-
lowing the arrowed hysteresis curve given a voltage varia-
tion. Batteries are always in charging mode unless the
battery bank voltage approaches its maximum voltage set-
point. In this case, the excess power produced by the wind
generators or the solar panels is diverted to a load resistor
immersed in a barrel of an antifreeze/water mixture. Each
production line has one 1600 W water-heating element that
converts the excess electrical energy into heat. The heat
inertia of the barrel of liquid then provides extra heating
capacity to help maintain/buffer the temperature inside
the greenhouse.
2.6.2. Load control and power distribution
Two different sets of lines supply the greenhouse subsys-
tems: the critical lines and the utility lines. The critical lines
feed the computers and the communication system; the
utility lines supply the pumps and fans. Each distribution
set contains one 24 V line, two 12 V lines and one 5 V line.
When the charge of the battery bank goes below a thresh-
old voltage, the utility line is first disconnected by the char-
ge controller, making available more power to charge the
batteries. If the voltage still drops below the second thresh-
old, then the critical line is also disconnected and all the
power generation is directed towards the charging of the
batteries. When the battery bank voltage rises, the critical
line is first reconnected, followed by the utility line. This
logic is represented by the hysteresis curves in Fig. 14,
where the X-axis represents the main bus voltage and the
state sequence of the load logic control is determined by
a virtual dot following the arrowed hysteresis curve given
a voltage variation.
Fig. 11. Temperature control strategy.
Fig. 12. Power generation, accumulation, and distribution.
R. Giroux et al. / Advances in Space Research 38 (2006) 1248–1259 1253
Finally, as shown in Fig. 12, a line switch (designed in-
house) is used to redirect the utility line power to the crit-
ical line in case of a failure of the latter. This feature adds
robustness to the power system.
2.6.3. Power monitoring
Although the power system is not controlled by the
DAQ & CTRL system, it is still monitored to evaluate its
performance. Shunt resistors are placed in series with the
line and the voltage drop is measured. The measurement
is designed so that a voltage drop of 1 mV at the shunt
resistor corresponds to 1A of current passing through it.
The power is then simply calculated.
The wind generators, solar panels, load dump, and load
consumption power are currently monitored, as depicted in
Fig. 15.
3. Greenhouse operation
The greenhouse is meant to operate year-round, but
with different modes of operation, depending on the condi-
tions: normal fall, normal spring, safe, and dormant
modes. In the fall mode, only the growth tray with the fall
crop is activated. That allows the spring crop system to
remain purged and dry to be able to pass through the cold
winter period without damage, as will be explained later in
this section. Obviously, the spring mode activates the
spring crop system. Both normal modes are activated dur-
ing the crop-growing period. During that time, all systems
are operational. However, the safe mode stops the environ-
ment control system (heating and cooling) to conserve elec-
trical power in preparation for the harsh winter season.
Data acquisition is still performed to monitor the condition
of the greenhouse. In the case of a dangerously low voltage
level in the batteries (risk of freezing), it is possible to
switch to a dormant mode where all systems are shut-down
except the communication infrastructure to conserve ener-
gy. In this mode, even the communication system is in low
power mode.
The following sequence of events details the current
planned yearly operations of the ACMG.
3.1. July
The greenhouse is situated in a very harsh and remote
environment. Hence, the research team can only do work
to improve and repair the systems during 3–4 weeks a year
(field season). The month of July is usually the most
human-friendly and logistically compatible time of the year
for such work. Upon arrival, the team investigates the
greenhouse status and begins maintenance. Also, the fall
Table 2
Power production and storage characteristics
Component Characteristics
Wind generators Total of 2 AIR industrial wind generators providing a maximum total power of 800 W @ 24 V for wind speed of 45 km/h
Solar panels Total of 6 Shell SM110-24 solar panels for a total peak power production of 660 W @ 35 V (irradiance level 1000 W/m
DC/DC converters Four converters SPS2412-5 (24 to 12 V) from Soltek Powersource
Two converters VTC60-24-5 (24 to 5 V) from analytic systems
Battery bank 36 Extreme EX-1000 12V batteries in a serial/parallel configuration providing 1800 A h @ 24 V nominal
Fig. 13. Charge control logic.
Fig. 14. Load control logic.
Fig. 15. Power system monitoring.
1254 R. Giroux et al. / Advances in Space Research 38 (2006) 1248–1259
growth tray is re-outfitted and seeded. Manual watering is
performed until the data acquisition and control system is
brought on line after any improvements/maintenance have
been completed, allowing germination of the crop. New
propane tanks replace empty ones and heaters are ignited.
The spring growth tray (for the following year) is seeded,
although its watering system is purged with air (no germi-
nation of the spring crop yet). No water other than in the
nutrient reservoir is present in the spring crop watering sys-
tem. At the end of the field season and upon departure of
the site, the crop in the fall tray has already started to grow.
3.2. August–September
The greenhouse operates in the normal-fall mode. Tem-
perature is controlled by means of heating and venting. The
data acquisition system returns daily data about the system
performance and operation. Crop yield is qualitatively
evaluated with the web cam pictures, as depicted at
Fig. 16. On this figure, the spring crop tray is also visible,
and it can be seen that no crop is growing.
After nearly two months of autonomous operation, the
fall crop has grown significantly. However, the propane
level is getting low and the heating system has to be shut
off. In order to have propane fuel for the next field season,
a shut-off limit of 20% propane level (80% consumption) is
set. Also, the winter period has less sun and usually milder
wind activity. The batteries can survive down to 60 Cif
fully charged. Hence, power consumption has to be
In the following example illustrated by Figs. 17 and 18,
the safe mode command was sent via the operations center
on 10 October 2004, resulting in a distinct drop in the
power demand and the inside greenhouse temperature.
This confirmed that the environmental control system is
shut down in addition to the watering system of the fall
plant growth system. Fig. 17 shows the controlled green-
house inside temperature and the outside temperature for
one month (September–October 2004). Starting October
10th, it is clear that the inside temperature follows with a
certain margin of error the outside temperature (this mar-
gin is induced by the natural radiation heating of a green-
house). In Fig. 18, it can be seen that the critical line is still
in operation keeping the DAQ & CTRL system and the
communication system active, although the utility line
power consumption is near zero since all utility loads have
been shut down. It is interesting to note that although all
loads have been turned off, there is still a marginal power
reading in the utility line from the power-sensing device
(shunt resistor). Although still under study, the inaccurate
reading seems to originate from the sensing loop and not
from a malfunctioning load.
The major impact of the safe mode is the lack of heating
while outside temperature goes below zero celsius, implying
Fig. 16. Web cam picture taken remotely on 9 August 2004 (fall crop on
top right, spring crop on bottom left).
Fig. 17. Greenhouse inside temperature over time.
Fig. 18. Power consumption of critical and utility lines.
R. Giroux et al. / Advances in Space Research 38 (2006) 1248–1259 1255
the freezing of any water in the greenhouse. However, the
safe mode also shuts down the watering of the fall plant
growth tray. As expected, the remaining water in the pump
circuit might damage the fall watering system and is pres-
ently treated as an unavoidable collateral damage, in addi-
tion to the freezing of the fall crops. Since the spring crop
watering system has been purged, no damage is expected in
that system.
3.3. October–April
The general greenhouse behavior during winter is mon-
itored: open-loop temperature and humidity inside and
outside the greenhouse, and especially the power system
performance. If there is enough light, pictures are also tak-
en to assess the environment, as shown in Fig. 19.
In order to get data for the entire winter, strict power
management is required. Fig. 20 shows an example of
power data gathered during the beginning of safe mode
operation. If the safe mode still draws too much power, a
dormant mode can be activated from the operations center
powering off all systems except the communication system.
3.4. May–June
During this period, the sun will start to warm up the
greenhouse to a level where the water in the reservoirs will
have melted. Being still in safe mode, the water tempera-
ture of the spring growth tray reservoir is monitored. After
several days of the water temperature being above 5 C, it
can be inferred that the water is in liquid state. Then, the
watering process of the spring crop can begin as soon as
the water temperature reach a predetermined temperature
that ensure decent germination rate. The operation mode
of the greenhouse is then turned to normal-spring mode.
Temperature is controlled but only by means of venting.
The heaters cannot presently be turned on remotely
because of propane valve mechanical fail-safe operation.
If the temperature inside the greenhouse is sufficiently con-
stant and favorable for plant growth, crops will germinate
and start to grow. Upon the crew arrival for the field sea-
son in July, remotely started crops would have been
The current operation sequence has some advantages
and drawbacks that will be discussed in the next section
of the paper.
4. The greenhouse systems and operation evolution
This research project has continuously evolved since its
inception. This section will describe the evolution of the
greenhouse systems and highlight some lessons learned.
Fig. 21 gives a broad summary of the improvements
throughout the project.
4.1. 07/2002–06/2003
The greenhouse structure was erected during the sum-
mer of 2002. A preliminary suite of sensors was also
deployed to assess the requirements for the environment
4.2. 07/2003–06/2004
The summer field season of 2003 was dedicated to the
installation of the environment control system (heaters
and ventilation), the data acquisition and control system,
the power system, the communication system and the first
plant growth system. At that time, the power system con-
tained one wind generator and 3 solar panels managed
by one dedicated power controller. Also, a battery bank
of 6 batteries was installed. A preliminary heat recovery
system was implemented with one dump load. The current
DAQ & CTRL system was installed at that time and was
Fig. 19. Webcam picture of the ACMG after a snowstorm at the end of
September 2004.
Fig. 20. Power monitoring.
1256 R. Giroux et al. / Advances in Space Research 38 (2006) 1248–1259
basically the same as described in the preceding section,
although some sensors have been added as the project
has evolved. The communication system was the same
MSAT modem telemetry system. Since the initial green-
house deployment was focused on the establishment of
the greenhouse structure, environmental sensors, and con-
trol actuators, it left little resources for actual plant growth
system development. The plant growth system was then a
basic ebb-and-flow nutrient delivery system. Low cost/
low power supply pumps were used to feed a basic
1.2 m ·2.4 m flood bench from Grotek.
Upon completion of the field season and departure from
the site in August 2003, the first autonomous and remotely
monitored greenhouse in the world was successfully oper-
ating. The first crop was growing within an average tem-
perature range of 15–30 C. However, the operations
center lost communication with the greenhouse on Septem-
ber 11th 2003. After several unsuccessful attempts to rees-
tablish the communication link, a helicopter mission went
to the site in May 2004 to investigate the failure. It was
concluded that the capacity of the power system was not
sufficient to deal with extreme cold (due to lack of charge)
and the production of power should be enhanced. The
demonstration of a remotely initiated spring crop growth
was not attempted due to failure of subsystems that could
not be replaced during the May 2004 visit.
4.3. 07/2004–06/2005
To address the issues of the previous year, the power sys-
tem was upgraded during the 2004 field season. Doubling the
battery capacity (6 to 12 batteries), doubling the power pro-
duction and adding a second power controller were among
the modifications. Also, the heat recovery system was mod-
ified to incorporate the second dump load from the new
power controller. In addition, the current plant growth sys-
tem (drip-line) was installed during that field season.
The beginning of the autonomous operation went well
until another communication outage occurred on August
11th 2004; only two weeks after the research team left the
site. The symptom of this communications outage was very
similar to the one of the previous year, despite the improve-
ment of the power system. However, after much hypothe-
sizing and verification, it appeared that the satellite
Fig. 21. High-level summary of greenhouse improvements.
Fig. 22. System improvements planned for summer 2006.
R. Giroux et al. / Advances in Space Research 38 (2006) 1248–1259 1257
communications terminal system was not operating in a
way that was optimized for such high latitudes, due to both
software and configuration issues in the MSAT network
and the satellite terminal. This was adjusted in collabora-
tion between SFU, Infosat, and MSV (the operators of
the MSAT spacecraft). The communication was reestab-
lished on September 14th 2004; however it was too late
to save the fall crop. The system is designed to generate a
general shut down command after three days of no com-
munication between the ACMG and the operations center.
Experimentation on environmental control continued,
and the system was put in safe mode on October 10th.
Once again, communication was lost in December 2004,
this time, due to a failure in the power system. It was later
determined that a blown fuse on the 12-V power line pro-
viding power to the communications system had caused the
failure. The cause of the blown fuse was not determined
since all devices were working properly when examined
the following field season.
4.4. 07/2005–09/2005
The 2005 field season was dedicated to consolidation of
assets and no major changes were performed with the
exception of a power storage increase. The 12 batteries
from the 2004 system were replaced with 36 batteries, total-
ing 1800 A h at 24 V. The controller and embedded com-
puter cabinets were insulated to protect them from
extreme cold. The line switching logic on the distribution
lines was integrated, to safeguard against the type of failure
that was experienced during the fall of 2004.
The research team left the site at the end of July 2005
with the fall growth process on its way. Although the plants
seemed to demonstrate signs of illness after some time, the
fall growth season was successfully conducted. Although
the exact cause of the plant growth issues has not yet been
determined, it is believed that the lack of an active nutrient
control mechanism is the limiting factor at this time. On
September 7, 2005, the safe mode command was issued,
stopping circulation fans to conserve power and stopping
heating to conserve propane. All systems are performing
nominally during the writing of this paper (October 2005).
During the upcoming winter, the power system will be
closely monitored to evaluate its efficiency to get through
the harsh conditions and keep a sufficient level of charge
to allow the start of the system in spring 2006. The current
performance results are very encouraging and suggest that
remote spring startup should be successful.
5. Discussion on future research and development activities
The first two field seasons of operation of the ACMG
(2003 and 2004) generated many valuable lessons. It has
become clear that a second ‘‘development’’ greenhouse,
in a more accessible location, is required in order to expe-
dite the implementation of new technologies and algo-
rithms in the ACMG. Access to the Arctic greenhouse is
only possible for a few weeks every summer. Before deploy-
ing systems in the Arctic, testing is conducted in the labo-
ratory; however, the first time they are deployed in an
actual greenhouse is on Devon Island. Between the inevita-
ble surprises, a very short field season, and a lack of infra-
structure on Devon Island, the implementation of new and
complex systems in the Arctic greenhouse is limited. To
address this important issue, the establishment of a readily
accessible development greenhouse similar to the one in the
Arctic was proposed. Currently under construction, this
development greenhouse is on the grounds of the Canadian
Space Agency headquarters in Quebec, Canada.
For the next field season (summer 2006), several system
improvements are planned based on the past experiences,
current investigations and future needs, as listed in
Fig. 22. The issues with crop health during the fall season
in 2005 have served to expedite the implementation of a
more robust nutrient feedback control system. A new con-
troller will be added to control this new addition and pave
the way to a more distributed DAQ & CTRL system. Also,
the environmental control system is not optimal in its cur-
rent operation and is currently the subject of improvement
efforts. The CSA-based development greenhouse will be a
great resource to test new hardware and software. Areas
under investigation are new fuel/heating systems, heat
recovery systems to take better advantage of the excess
power production and more advanced control algorithms
for climate control. Remote ignition of the heaters will also
be a priority for system improvement. Finally, based on the
current field season data of the power system, fine-tuning
might involve a more powerful generation system and/or
a third production device independent from the two cur-
rent types of energy production.
The primary greenhouse systems have been performing
successfully throughout this year, enabling more fundamen-
tal research to be performed in the coming years. Four main
areas have been identified and will form the basis of engineer-
ing and space science research: biological systems, environ-
mental control systems, power and communication
systems, and operations strategies for exploration purposes.
6. Conclusion
As the planning for the human exploration of the moon
and Mars continues, the use of terrestrial analogues of
space environments will prove to be a valuable resource
for preparing scientific investigations and science opera-
tions, developing technologies, understanding/developing
exploration protocols (i.e., traverse standard operating
procedures), and for the training of future flight crews.
This project is demonstrating the value of such analogue
sites, since the development team must deal with con-
straints that cannot be reproduced nor anticipated in a lab-
oratory environment. It will eventually see life sciences
being carried out within the greenhouse. The concept of
how a greenhouse can be incorporated into a research base
will also be explored.
1258 R. Giroux et al. / Advances in Space Research 38 (2006) 1248–1259
This greenhouse serves as an initial experimental, field-
deployed test bed that supports field research of inherent
and immediate value, and from which lessons may be
learned to support the design and implementation of sec-
ond-generation field facilities enabling higher fidelity dem-
onstrations. It took several field seasons of development to
attain the level of readiness we are now capable of. The sys-
tem failures over the years have pointed us underestimated
challenges in the design. These insights have helped us
improve the greenhouse operation to a point where we
are now able to operate the critical systems year around
in an extreme environment. Now that the engineering por-
tion of the project is mature enough, plant science will start
to take more field season time and effort. Ultimately,
through a sequential and iterative program of experimenta-
tion, it is hoped that a better understanding of the opera-
tional challenges faced by future astronauts on the
surface of Mars (or other planetary bodies) will be gained.
To some extent, the technology developed (and to be
developed) for the Arthur Clarke Mars Greenhouse could
have direct applications for Canada’s estimated $2 billion
commercial greenhouse industry. In the future, new tech-
nologies for optimizing greenhouse energy use efficiency,
and autonomous and remote operation, could provide
direct benefits to this ground-based industry.
The Haughton-Mars Project (HMP)’s Arthur Clarke
Mars Greenhouse (ACMG) was donated by SpaceRef
Interactive, Inc. and established at the HMP Base Camp
(now HMP Research Station) with initial sponsorship sup-
port from NASA. The ACMG facility is currently man-
aged and operated by the Mars Institute, in partnership
with the SETI Institute and Simon Fraser University.
The authors would like to thank the Ontario Centers of
Excellence (OCE) and MacDonald Dettweiler & Associates
Ltd. (MDA) for their partial financial support for the re-
search described in this paper.
Allen, J. Biosphere 2: Description, Purpose, and Conceptual Design.
International Conference on Life Support & Biospherics, University of
Alabama in Huntsville, Alabama, 1992.
Andre, M., Massimino, D. Growth of plants at reduced pressures:
experiments in wheat – technological advantages and constraints. Adv.
Space Res. 12 (5), 97–106, 1992.
Bartsev, S.I., Mezhevikin, V.V., Okhonin, V.A. Bios-4 as an embodiment
of CELSS development conception. Adv. Space Res. 18 (1/2), 201–204,
Bucklin, R.A., Leary, J.D., Rygalov, V., et al. Design parameters for Mars
deployable greenhouse. Proceedings of the 31th International Confer-
ence on Environmental Systems. Orlando, FL, SAE aerospace:
Technical Paper 2001-01-2428, 2001.
Clawson, J.M., Hoeln, A., Wheeler, R.M. Inflatable transparent structure
for Mars greenhouse applications. Proceedings of the 35th Interna-
tional Conference on Environmental Systems. Rome, Italy, SAE
aerospace: Technical paper 2005-01-2846, 2005.
Dixon, M., Wehkamp, C.A., Stasiak, M. Physiological response of lettuce
(Lactuca sativa) to reduced atmospheric pressure, in: Proceedings of
the 35th International Conference on Environmental Systems. Rome,
Italy, SAE aerospace: Technical paper 2005-01-3074, 2005.
Drysdale, A., Collins, R. Mars base zero – a terrestrial analog, in:
Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Environmental
Systems. Rome, Italy, SAE aerospace: Technical paper 2005-01-2756,
Goto, E., Iwabuchi, K., Takakura, T. Effect of reduced total air pressure
on spinach growth. J. Agric. Meteorol. 51, 139–143, 1995.
Janssen, E.G.O.N., Tse, T.C., Mas, J.L., et al. Design approach and
implementation of a Mars surface food production unit, in: Proceed-
ings of the 35th International Conference on Environmental Systems.
Rome, Italy, SAE aerospace: Technical paper 2005-01-2824, 2005.
Lasseur, C., Paille
´, C., Lamaze, B., et al. MELISSA: overview of the
project and perspective, in: Proceedings of the 35th International
Conference on Environmental Systems. Rome, Italy, SAE aerospace:
Technical paper 2005-01-3066, 2005.
Perino, M.A., Lobascio, C., Pastor, S. Greenhouse: a strategic element to
support humans in space, in: Proceedings of the 7th ISU Annual
International Symposium. Strasbourg, International Space University,
Rygalov, V.Y., Buklin, R.A., Drysdale, A.E., et al. Low pressure
greenhouse concept for Mars: atmospheric composition, in: Proceed-
ings of the 32th International Conference on Environmental Systems.
San Antonio, TX, SAE aerospace: Technical Paper 2002-01-2392,
Salisbury, F.B., Gitelson, J.I., Lisovsky, G.M. Bios-3: Siberian experi-
ments in bioregenerative life support. Bioscience 47, 575–585, 1997.
Scarascia-Mugnozza, G., Schettini, E. Preliminary indication on the
technological systems for an Italian space greenhouse, in: Proceed-
ings of the 32th International Conference on Environmental Systems.
San Antonio, TX, SAE aerospace: Technical paper 2002-01-2486,
Wheeler, R.M., Martin-Brennan, C. Mars Greenhouses: concepts and
challenges, in: Proceedings from a 1999 Workshop, NASA Tech.
Mem. 208577, 2000.
Wheeler, R.M., Stutte, G.W., Subbarao, G.V. Plant growth and human
life support for space travel, in: Handbook of Plant and Crop
Physiology. M. Pessarakli, New York, pp. 925–941, 2001.
R. Giroux et al. / Advances in Space Research 38 (2006) 1248–1259 1259
... Despommier pointed out a number of reasons why vertical farming could be very attractive for politicians [19][20][21]. Moreover, absolutely fantastic horizons were opening up in the context of space exploration [34] and from the perspective of economic, environmental, social and political aspects [23,35,36]. The arguments put forward by Cox, [37] have become less relevant because of the continuous progress in technology. ...
... The model of closed environment can be also transferred to remote polar or deserted areas, or even to space exploration, where food production may be needed in spaceships or on other planets [34]. ...
Full-text available
This paper is dedicated to studying the nutrition, health status and food provision of the people living the northern regions of Russia. The authors developed a concept of comprehensive interdisciplinary research of traditional and innovative behavioral practices of actors in the northern regions of Russia in the field of food production and consumption in order to study the structure of nutrition of the population, its health status and the technologies that are used to provide the people with food products. The interdisciplinary comprehensive research applied the following methods: (a) statistical method; (b) sociological method of mass survey; (c) sociological method of expert interviews; (d) method of feasibility study; (e) method of mathematical modeling. According to the results of the analysis, the nutrition of the people living in the norther regions is characterized by insufficient consumption of fresh vegetables, meat and processed meat, fish and seafood, milk and dairy products, some vitamins and bio-elements (such as selenium, calcium) and excessive consumption of saturated fats and flour products. The following problems related to providing the population of the northern regions of Russia with food products were identified: the agriculture in almost all northern regions of Russia has negative profitability; imported food products and food ingredients are mostly used; there are drawbacks of logistics, transportation and storage of food products; the natural and climate conditions are unfavorable for traditional agriculture. The paper substantiates the economic, environmental, social, and political advantages of highly automated agro-industrial complex of vertical farming as an alternative method for providing food security of the inhabitants of the northern regions of Russia.
... In putting forth his pioneering conception, Despommier outlined a number of reasons why vertical farming could be highly attractive to policy makers: all-year-round crop production; higher yields (by a factor of six or more depending on the crop), avoidance of droughts, floods, and pests; water recycling; ecosystem restoration; reduction of pathogens; provision of energy to the grid through methane generation from compost; reduction in use of fossil fuels (no tractors, farm machinery, or shipping), and creation of new jobs. The closed environment could conceivably be also suitable for translation to other planetary environments in the context of space exploration (Giroux et al. 2006). ...
... Some urban centers, such as Singapore, already produce 10% of leafy green vegetables by indoor farming because of a commitment to enhance domestic food security. The closed-environment model can also be translated to remote polar or desert regions, or even space exploration, where food production on spacecraft or other planets may be necessary (Giroux et al. 2006). ...
Full-text available
The unremitting trends of increasing population, urbanization, diminishing water supply, and continuing climate change have contributed to declining stocks of arable land per person. As land resources for agriculture decrease, policy makers are faced with the challenge of sustainability and feeding the rapidly growing world population which is projected to reach approximately 9.7 billion in 2050. Solutions for improving future food production are exemplified by urban vertical farming which involves much greater use of technology and automation for land-use optimization. The vertical farm strategy aims to significantly increase productivity and reduce the environmental footprint within a framework of urban, indoor, climate-controlled high-rise buildings. It is claimed that such facilities offer many potential advantages as a clean and green source of food, along with biosecurity, freedom from pests, droughts, and reduced use of transportation and fossil fuels. In this article, the issues involved are evaluated together with potential advantages and disadvantages. Possible implications are identified for consideration by policy makers and to facilitate further economic analysis.
... Reciprocally, advanced life support systems have and continue to demonstrate significant technology transfer to terrestrial greenhouse production (Bamsey et al., 2009). The Haughton Mars Project's Arthur Clarke Mars Greenhouse (ACMG) in the Canadian High Arctic (75°26′N, 89°52′W) has supported extreme environment related research for many years (Giroux et al., 2006). A group at the German Aerospace Center is currently developing a shipping container-style closed system named the Eden ISS that will be deployed at the Neumayer III station in Antarctica in late 2017 (Zabel et al., 2015). ...
... High winds, low temperatures and large snowfalls render such a system unfeasible in more extreme climates. To adapt to extreme conditions, the cover of the ACMG was made of 6-mm Twin Wall Lexan polycarbonate sheets, with an RSI value of 1.55 m 2 ·°C·W -1 , supported by 1.2-m spaced steel struts complying with a 163 kg·m -2 live load specification and resisting up to 144 km·h -1 wind speeds (Giroux et al., 2006). The trellis load must be considered when dense crop production is occurring. ...
Many methods of protected agriculture are used to modify the growing environment of plants. Ideally, plant production would take place in regions that do not require protective structures, regions that present ideal temperatures, no harsh extremes, and sufficient but not excess precipitation. This is not the case however, as most countries, save for a select few, require various forms of controlled environment agriculture to protect crops against climatic and environmental extremes. Although the greenhouse industry has developed vast amounts of technology for the temperate climate regions of our planet, much remains to be improved in terms of protected agriculture in the more extreme climates. Tropical, arid, polar and urban locations offer contrasting environments that present various challenges for plant growth. Some challenges are specific to each location, while others are common across them. Tropical and arid climates offer high solar radiation, but present harsh temperature and relative humidity conditions. Most protected agriculture structures are relatively open in nature to ventilate and discharge heat, but are susceptible to pests and diseases. On the other hand, polar climates and urban environments often lack solar radiation and require a high level of control of the air quality. The structures used in these environments are relatively enclosed to entrap heat (polar) and to make efficient use of space. The sustainability of available technologies and energy efficiency are important themes present in all discussed climates and environments. Protected agriculture technologies offer solutions to growers in locations with extreme climates wishing to produce high yields of high quality crop, and this article presents a review of the existing challenges and of the advancements made in this field.
... In addition, development of unique photosynthetic systems may open up the possibilities of designing plants for unique environments and new growing situations, including vertical farms, Antarctic greenhouse (Bamsey et al. 2015) and new non-terrestrial environments, such as space travel (Poulet et al. 2014), where plants would be exposed to different light intensities including a mix of artificial and natural light; or on the surface of Mars, where light levels are approximately 43% of those on Earth. Work to design and operate greenhouses in extreme environments, such as the Arthur Clarke Mars Greenhouse (Giroux et al. 2006;Bamsey et al. 2009) and the Lunar greenhouse design (Zeidler et al. 2017) are ongoing, but it may be necessary to 'genetically' acclimate new plant varieties to be productive in an essentially low light environment. Furthermore, extra-terrestrial environments also have high UV levels and as previously shown acylated anthocyanins absorb UV, offering a further potential mechanism of protecting plants in such environments. ...
Full-text available
Photosynthetic pigments are an integral and vital part of all photosynthetic machinery and are present in different types and abundances throughout the photosynthetic apparatus. Chlorophyll, carotenoids and phycobilins are the prime photosynthetic pigments which facilitate efficient light absorption in plants, algae, and cyanobacteria. The chlorophyll family plays a vital role in light harvesting by absorbing light at different wavelengths and allowing photosynthetic organisms to adapt to different environments, either in the long-term or during transient changes in light. Carotenoids play diverse roles in photosynthesis, including light capture and as crucial antioxidants to reduce photodamage and photoinhibition. In the marine habitat, phycobilins capture a wide spectrum of light and have allowed cyanobacteria and red algae to colonise deep waters where other frequencies of light are attenuated by the water column. In this review, we discuss the potential strategies that photosynthetic pigments provide, coupled with development of molecular biological techniques, to improve crop yields through enhanced light harvesting, increased photoprotection and improved photosynthetic efficiency.
... Les objectifs de ces expériences étaient : de voir s'il était possible d'initier des projets de jardinage dans les communautés arctiques ; d'évaluer les effets de l'utilisation de châssis froids (« cold frames ») et de « structures igloo » sur la production de plantes extrême pour les plantes) [75]. Son enveloppe est composée d'une double couche de polycarbonate de 6 mm d'épaisseur, et elle est équipée d'un sas d'entrée afin d'éviter les déperditions de chaleur quand on ouvre la porte. ...
Vivant sur des territoires isolés où aucune route terrestre ne permet de se rendre, les Inuits du nord canadien (Nunavik) font face, depuis les dernières décennies, à de grands défis d’adaptation, notamment sur le plan de l’alimentation et de l'accès à l'énergie. La nourriture traditionnelle issue des activités de chasse, de pêche et de cueillette est de plus en plus difficile à obtenir, tandis que les aliments euro-canadiens apportés par avion ou par bateau coûtent de plus en plus cher. La serriculture apparaît alors comme une solution permettant d'améliorer l'accès aux légumes frais en réduisant les coûts écologique et financier liés au transport de ces légumes.La littérature scientifique portant sur l'étude physique des serres nordiques et les données énergétiques (température, consommation d’électricité, etc.) sur le sujet sont rares. Dans un premier temps, nous avons recensé les serres nordiques existantes d'Amérique du Nord, et nous avons montré que le sujet est relativement récent. Par ailleurs, cette revue de littérature a révélé que la majorité des serres dénombrées ne sont pas adaptées au climat froid, conduisant à des saisons de cultures courtes. Ensuite, nous avons abordé l'aspect expérimental. Les données issues d'une campagne d’instrumentation de la serre nordique de Kuujjuaq ont été analysées afin de démontrer la pertinence de l'installation d'un système de stockage thermique journalier. Le dimensionnement et la construction de ce dernier, utilisant l'air comme fluide caloporteur et des roches locales en tant que matériau de stockage, sont également présentés. L'instrumentation du lit de roches stockant la chaleur a permis l'étude des données énergétiques durant les phases de charge et de décharge du stock. Cette analyse a démontré l'impact positif de l'installation du système de stockage sur le comportement thermique de la serre. Enfin, nous avons modélisé le comportement thermique de la serre et du système de stockage. En effet, la simulation numérique du climat sous serre est essentielle afin de comprendre les mécanismes d'amélioration des serres existantes et/ou d'optimiser la conception des enceintes de production végétale en milieu nordique. Ainsi, un modèle nodal de la serre et un modèle du système de stockage sont détaillés et validés. Un processus de calibration portant sur les valeurs numériques des paramètres des modèles est également développé afin d'en améliorer les performances.
... Introducing his innovative concept, Dickson D. Despommier set out several reasons why vertical farming could become very attractive to policymakers: year-round production of agricultural crops; higher yields (six times or more), prevention of drought, floods and pest control; recirculation of water; restoration of eco-systems; reduction in pathogens; provision of energy systems thanks to methane built up from compost; less fossil fuels as tractors; agricultural machinery and shipping would not be needed; and new jobs would be created [103][104][105]. Moreover, completely fantastic horizons would open up thanks to the progress in space research; a closed environment would, probably, be suitable for transforming new food products into other planetary conditions in the context of space exploration [106]. The declared advantages of vertical farming can be categorized and generalized in terms of economic, environmental, social and political aspects [107,108]. ...
Full-text available
The main aim of the article is to find out the key factors of sustainable development of the Russian Arctic, which is strategically significant for Russia. The academic literature was reviewed to find out the time dynamics of the references to the economic models suitable for achieving the goals of sustainable development, and there has been hyperbolic growth in the attention paid to similar problems all around the world. The article compares three relatively new economic models in order to understand which of them is the most applicable to the promotion of sustainable development in the Russian Arctic: (a) bioeconomy, (b) green economy and (c) circular economy. The analysis of the relevant sources shows that the model of the circular economy is preferable for the Russian Arctic. Most of the article is dedicated to understanding the sources and mechanisms of the circular economy. The schematic description of vertical greenhouses and possibility of using vertical farms are presented in the paper as an example of organization of local food production according to the principles of the circular economy. The article considers a modeled project of creating a vertical farm in the Russian Arctic and a simulated indicator—profit of the vertical farm.
... The system is only partially automated since the crew can also modify the environment of the greenhouse. Giroux et al. (2006) designed a greenhouse for Mars's environment. The greenhouse is equipped with sensors to monitor the humidity, temperature, and radiation. ...
The development of autonomous greenhouses has caught the interest of many researchers and industrial considering their potential of offering an optimal environment for the growth of high-quality crops with minimum resources. Since an autonomous greenhouse is a mechatronic system, the consideration of its subsystem (e.g. heating systems) and component (e.g. actuators and sensors) interactions early in the design phase can ease the product development process. Indeed, this consideration could shorten the design process, reduce the number of redesign loops, and improve the performance of the overall mechatronic system. In the case of a greenhouse, it would lead to a higher quality of the crops and a better management of resources. In this work, the layout design of a general autonomous greenhouse is translated into an optimization problem statement while considering product-related dependencies. Then, a genetic algorithm is used to carry out the optimization of the layout design. The methodology is applied to the design of a fully autonomous greenhouse (45 cm × 30 cm × 30 cm) for the growth of plants in space. Although some objectives are conflictual, the developed algorithm proposes a compromise to obtain a near-optimal feasible layout design. The algorithm was also able to optimize the volume of components (occupied space) while considering the energy consumption and the overall mass. Their respective summed values are 2844.32 cm ³ , which represents 7% of the total volume, 5.86 W, and 655.8 g.
... Year of construction Giroux et al. (2006) P. Piché, et al. Solar Energy 204 (2020) 90-105 designed for cold climates. ...
This research focuses on the potential of greenhouse cultivation in circumpolar territories. It begins with a survey that encompasses most of the northern greenhouses in North America. This review emphasizes the need for appropriate data and for the right energy system design. Next, the paper focuses on a case study located in Nunavik, which is the northern Inuit territory of the province of Quebec. The Kuujjuaq cooperative greenhouse has been instrumented since June 2016 to collect data on temperature and relative humidity throughout the growing season. These measures have highlighted a major problem: a temperature difference between day and night that is too large, hindering crop development. To counteract this thermal behavior, a heat storage system was designed, built and installed in October 2018. It is the first time that a rock and air-based sensible thermal energy storage system, taking into account local materials and resources, has been designed and built in a northern greenhouse. This paper presents its main characteristics as well as records of temperature changes throughout the growing season. Moreover, an energy balance is presented for three days at the beginning of June 2019.
... A pump delivers water and nutrients to the plants every hour. The remaining water is collected in a tank and reused for the next watering (Giroux et al., 2006). The chamber is outfitted with a hydroponic, semiautomated plant cultivation system. ...
Earth’s biosphere is sustained by its biological diversity, which forms an intricate network of biological, physical and chemical pathways. This network has many fail-safe redundant func-tions including buffer stocks of inert biomass, huge amounts of water and the large volume of gases in the atmosphere. By contrast, manmade habitats for human space exploration are closed ecosystems that represent only a trivial fraction of Earth’s biosphere. The employment of bio-regenerative processes complemented with physical-chemical tech-nologies is thought to have numerous advantages from the perspective of redundancy and reducing resupply mass for the sustained human presence in space or on other planetary surfaces. However, the combination of bio-regenerative processes, such as plant cultivation, with physical-chemical processes to form hybrid life support systems is challenging. Such systems are a concert of many interdependencies and interacting feedback loops, which are difficult to operate in a desired range of set points. Furthermore, the complexity of such sys-tems makes them vulnerable to perturbations. Applying system dynamics modelling to study hybrid life support systems is a promising ap-proach. System dynamics is a methodology used to study the dynamic behavior of complex systems and how such systems can be defended against, or made to benefit from, the per-turbations that fall upon them. This thesis describes the development of a system dynamics model to run exploratory simulations, which can lead to new insights into the complex behav-ior of hybrid life support systems. An improved understanding of the overall system behavior also helps to develop sustainable, reliable and resilient life support architectures for future human space exploration. A set of simulations with a hybrid life support system integrated into a Mars habitat has been executed and the results show a strong impact of space greenhouses on the life support sys-tem behavior and the different matter flows. It is also evident from the simulation results that a hybrid life support system can recover from a perturbation event in most cases without a fatal mission end. Recycling urine to produce a plant nutrient solution is a novel approach in further closing loops in space life support systems. Within this thesis, a number of experiments have been executed in order to determine the effectiveness of a urine-derived nutrient solution com-pared to a standard reference solution. The results show that in principle plants can be grown with a nutrient solution made of human urine, but that the yield is lower compared to the reference solution. However, the urine-derived solution might be tuned by adding small amounts of additional nutrients to remove the imbalance of certain elements. This way the nutrient salts supplied from Earth could be reduced.
... The nominal Neumayer III satellite connection will be utilized for real-time data transmission of greenhouse data and for remote commanding. Unlike examples of other past analogue plant production facilities [1,82], the DLR greenhouse module will benefit in that it will be constantly human tended and thus in addition to the advanced sensing suite, operators will quickly be able to address off-nominal conditions. Operators will gain operational experience through considerable pre-deployment testing of the greenhouse module in Germany. ...
Conference Paper
Designs for an Antarctic plant production system to be deployed at Germany’s Neumayer Station III are presented. Characterization and testing of several key controlled environment agriculture technologies are ongoing at the German Aerospace Center’s Institute of Space Systems. Subsystems under development at the Evolution and Design of Environmentally-Closed Nutrition-Sources (EDEN) laboratory include, tuned LED lighting, aeroponic nutrient delivery, ion-selective sensors and modular growth pallets. The Antarctic greenhouse module baseline form factor is a standard sea shipping container, which allows for use of nominal Antarctic logistics networks. The facility will be fixed onto a specially constructed platform and co-located near the Alfred Wegner Institute’s Neumayer Station III. The plant production facility will be operated year-round with maximum production per unit volume achieved through the deployment of modular grow units in a stackable rack architecture. In such a configuration the greenhouse module system can provide several kilograms of fresh edible biomass per day. Forty foot and 20 ft container configurations are described as well as the general design requirements, including specifics relevant to operations at Neumayer III. Successful deployment of such a facility will further the technology readiness and operational experience of space-based bioregenerative life support systems. Finally, the general design is presented in the context of an historical review of past Antarctic plant production facilities. This first known inventory of documented Antarctic plant production facilities, organizes the facilities with respect to Antarctic station, dates of operation, internal/external configuration and estimated production area.
Full-text available
A key function required of any infrastructure to support people in space for a considerable time is the ability to reproduce, as far as possible, the Earth’s natural ecosystem, aiming at the “closure” of the air, water and food cycles in a so-called Closed Ecological Life-support System (CELSS). The higher plant compartment is the largest element in a CELSS. The spacefaring nations aim to have a space infrastructure evolving from fully robotic/automatic systems up to a human-tended base of a sophisticated structure. In this framework, Alenia Spazio has proposed a “Biological Module” for the International Space Station (ISS), conceived as a large, inflatable module, including a robotically assisted plant compartment which would provide the crew with edible biomass and support the ISS environmental control and waste management functions. The first steps towards this ambitious goal encompass ground and flight experimentation of small-scale plant facilities. A “biology/greenhouse” module has recently been studied by Alenia Spazio and proposed as a strategic element for a base for humans on the surface of Mars. Its main objectives would be to sustain the crew through in situ food production, and to provide a suitable laboratory for scientific research on the Mars environment, especially the search for prebiotic forms of life.
This paper presents background information and describes operating experience with Mars Base Zero, a terrestrial analog of a Mars base situated in Fairbanks, Alaska. Mars Base Zero is the current stage in a progression from a vegetable garden to a fully closed system (Nauvik) that the International Space Exploration and Colonization Company (ISECCo) has undertaken. Mars Base Zero is an 80 m2 greenhouse, with 18m2 of living space attached. The primary goal is to determine the necessary size for Nauvik in order to support one to four people using current ISECCo techniques for growing food crops. In the spring of 2004 Mars Base Zero was planted, and in the fall of 2004, one subject, Ray Collins, was closed in the system for 39 days. The data from this closure indicates that, using ISECCo cropping techniques, Nauvik will need 150 m2 of crop area to support one person. While problems were encountered, the minimum goal of 30 days closure was exceeded. The diet was vegetarian, mostly potatoes. Plant productivity, diet, water consumption, waste production and crew time were tracked. Urine and feces were sterilized and recycled, though the system was largely open to water as well as air. Pests were a minor problem, eating about 20% of the wheat and 5% of the beets (mice), and damaging lettuce, sunflowers and spinach (aphids). Other issues included minor health problems; diet palatability & quality; odors from waste sterilization; and equipment problems. Thus, while years of work remain to be done to improve closure and operating procedures, the experiment was a success.
This paper describes a design proposal for adapting the OGEGU Food Production Unit (FPU) to the surface of Mars in order to produce up to 40% of the diet for a six-member crew by growing a pre-defined set of vegetable food species. The external structure, lighting system and plant support system are assessed using ESM analysis. The study shows that the mass of an FPU operating on the Mars surface, featuring an opaque inflatable structure plus all the required subsystems and equipment, is in the order of 14,000 kg. The required volume is around 150 m3 and the power consumption is around 140 kW. A reduction of c. 20 kW could be obtained by exploiting natural light using transparent materials. Finally, the paper concludes with the identification of some technological gaps that need to be investigated further for the purpose of establishing a feasible FPU on Mars.
Mars is likely the best candidate for future planetary exploration however the Martian atmosphere is at a pressure of ~0.6 kPa. This extremely low pressure demands that plant growth structures be isolated from the ambient environment. While it is clear that it is desirable to predict the contributions that plants will make to bioregenerative life support systems at reduced atmospheric pressures, research has been limited. This study examines carbon exchange and evapotranspiration in order to establish a baseline that will aid in the development of an atmospheric composition that allows for reduced pressure plant growth without compromising the plant production yields required for human life support.
For extended human presence in space, shipping all food, oxygen and water from the Earth will be costly. Besides, some food items desired in the diet will not keep long enough and so the only alternative is to growing them aboard. Plants can produce food and oxygen for human needs, can contribute to remove and reclaim carbon dioxide, excess of humidity and the organic wastes. The international scientific community has been making efforts towards developing technologies to realise a sustainable Bioregenerative Life Support System. In this paper some indications on the technological systems for an Italian Space Greenhouse are described.
The MELISSA (Micro-Ecological Life Support Alternative) project was initiated in 1989. The recycling system is conceived as a micro-organisms and higher plants based ecosystem. As a matter of fact, it is intended as a tool to gain understanding of closed life support, as well as the development of the technology for a future life support system for long term manned space missions, e.g. a lunar base or a mission to Mars. The collaboration was established through a Memorandum of Understanding and is managed by ESA. It involves several independent organisations: University of Ghent, EPAS, SCK, VITO (B), University of Clermont Ferrand, SHERPA (F), University "Autonoma" of Barcelona (E), University of Guelph (CND). It is co-funded by ESA, the MELISSA partners, the Belgian (DWTC), the Spanish (CIRIT and CICYT) and Canadian (CRESTech, CSA) authorities. The driving element of MELISSA is the production of food water and oxygen from organic waste (inedible biomass, CO2, faeces, urea). Based on the principle of an "aquatic" ecosystem, MELISSA process comprises 5 compartments from the anoxygenic fermenter up to the photosynthetic one (algae and higher plants). The choice of this compartmentalised structure is required by the very high level of safety requirements and justified by the need of an engineering approach and to build deterministic control strategy. During the past 15 years of research and development, a very progressive approach has been developed to understand and control the MELISSA loop. This approach starts from the selection of the microbial strains and higher plant crops, their characterisation and mathematical modelling, the validation of the control strategy, up to the demonstration on Earth, at pilot scale. The project is organised in 5 phases: Basic R&D, Preliminary flight experiment, Ground & space demonstration, Terrestrial transfer, Education & communication.
It is proposed to employ a greenhouse for life support on the Martian surface to reduce the equivalent system mass (ESM) penalties encountered with electrical crop lighting. The ESM of a naturally lit plant growth system compares favorably to an electrically lit system when corrections for area are made based on available light levels. A transparent structure should be more efficient at collecting insolation than collectors due to the diffusivity of the Mars atmosphere and inherent transmission losses encountered with fiber optics. The need to provide a pressurized environment for the plants indicates the use of an inflatable structure. Materials and design concepts are reviewed for their applicability to an inflatable greenhouse.
Spinach growth experiments were conducted to study the feasibility of growing plants under hypobaric condition in order to achieve plant production for a controlled ecological life support system (CELSS) in space. An environmental control system, including a reduced-pressure growth chamber, was constructed to grow spinach under low total air pressures. The system controls total and partial pressures, temperature, and relative humidity in the chamber. Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.), which was grown at atmospheric pressure (101 kPa), was transplanted in the chamber and exposed to various pressure conditions for 10 days. PPFD was maintained at 120μmol m⁻²s⁻¹, and the light period was set at 14 h/day, pH was set at 6.0, and electric conductivity (EC) was 220 mS/m. Air temperature and relative humidity (RH) were 20°C and 73 to 75%, respectively. Thirty plants of 0.6 g fresh weight each were transplanted to the chamber 15 days after seeding and were exposed to various pressure conditions for 10 days. Relative growth rates at 50 and 75 kPa for the half period (Day 0-Day 5) showed higher values, possibly because the CO2 diffusion rate was higher at the lower total pressures, boundary layer and stomatal resistances became smaller, and as a result, the photosynthetic rate increased. However, at Day 10, there was no significant difference in spinach growth among 50, 75, and 100 kPa treatments with the same CO2 partial pressure condition (100 Pa). Since spinach grew more at 100 Pa of CO2 partial pressure than at 50 Pa, CO2 enrichment is considered to be effective under reduced air pressure conditions. © 1995, The Society of Agricultural Meteorology of Japan. All rights reserved.