... The effect of household wealth on education can be tackled from two perspectives: (i) the ability (or inability) to foot direct costs like fees and indirect costs like feeding of children, scholastic materials, uniforms, transport to school, building fund, among others but also (ii) opportunity costs i.e. the labor of children missed if they are to enroll in school, which largely affects poorer, rural based and peasant households but more disproportionately the girls as was the case in Kenya (Kabubo-mariara & Mwabu, 2007), Uganda (UNICEF, 2005), Burkina Faso (Kobiané, 2006), Nigeria (Lincove, 2009) and Ghana (Akyeampong, 2009 In Uganda, costs on books, other supplies and uniforms (UBOS, 2010a), other fees charged by some schools to cover salaries of teachers since the government often delayed to pay (Zuze & Leibbrandt, 2011) as well as lack of interest in school (Ssewamala et al., 2011(Deininger, 2003Kalule, 2000) were still some reasons for non-enrolment and poor retention of some children. Studies elsewhere have in addition made mention of building fund, sports and water bills, costs on clothing, accommodation, feeding and PTA fees, still being charged by some schools as posing a challenge to education of mostly the very poor household population as was reported in Ghana (Akyeampong, 2009), Kenya (Kabubomariara & Mwabu, 2007Somerset, 2011), Malawi (Chimombo, 2009;Kadzamira & Rose, 2003), rural Madagascar (Deleigne & Kail, 2010) and Burkina Faso (Pilon, 2010). ...