Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen and natural gas fueled power plant technologies

Department of Engineering and Management of Energy Resources, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece
Applied Thermal Engineering (Impact Factor: 2.74). 08/2009; 29(11-12):2228-2234. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.11.014


This paper evaluates nine types of electrical energy generation options with regard to seven criteria. The options use natural gas or hydrogen as a fuel. The Analytic Hierarchy Process was used to perform the evaluation, which allows decision-making when single or multiple criteria are considered.The options that were evaluated are the hydrogen combustion turbine, the hydrogen internal combustion engine, the hydrogen fuelled phosphoric acid fuel cell, the hydrogen fuelled solid oxide fuel cell, the natural gas fuelled phosphoric acid fuel cell, the natural gas fuelled solid oxide fuel cell, the natural gas turbine, the natural gas combined cycle and the natural gas internal combustion engine.The criteria used for the evaluation are CO2 emissions, NOX emissions, efficiency, capital cost, operation and maintenance costs, service life and produced electricity cost.A total of 19 scenarios were studied. In 15 of these scenarios, the hydrogen turbine ranked first and proved to be the most preferred electricity production technology. However since the hydrogen combustion turbine is still under research, the most preferred power generation technology which is available nowadays proved to be the natural gas combined cycle which ranked first in five scenarios and second in eight. The last in ranking electricity production technology proved to be the natural gas fuelled phosphoric acid fuel cell, which ranked in the last position in 13 scenarios.

Download full-text


Available from: Stylianos D. Stefanidis
  • Source
    • "In Refs. [10] and [11], AHP was applied to evaluate hydrogen fueling systems and hydrogen and natural gas fuelled power plant technologies. AHP has standard steps: 1) Building problem as a hierarchical model based on specific criterion that is broken down from the final target; 2) deciding the weights of criterions through pairwise comparison; 3) estimating each criteria and synthesizing them to the overall goal. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper proposes a hierarchical model for automotive fuel cell system evaluation, comparison and applicability assessment through Analytic Hierarchy Process. A dual-layer criterion based hierarchical model is proposed, which features 9 sub-performances and 18 indices. Criterion weights and scoring function are both established. Experimental application is carried out to illustrate the evaluation process and how the proposed model operates. Results show that the sub-performance derived from automotive powertrain requirements represented the overall characteristics of the PEMFCs. The selected 18 most significant indices also made each sub-performance quantitatively assessable.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2014 · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • Source
    • "Power generated using hydrogen as fuel could have negligible emissions. However, hydrogen technologies are still under development and are relatively more expensive (Pilavachi et al., 2009b). The energy system which uses hydrogen as a fuel is called hydrogen energy system (HES). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hydrogen is a renewable energy source and has the potential to mitigate the green house gas effect and to meet the increasing global electricity demand. In the present study, a multicriteria methodology is developed by combining graph theory and analytic hierarchy process methods for the evaluation and selection of hydrogen energy systems. The hydrogen energy system alternatives are assessed with respect to economic, environmental, performance and social criteria by computing the hydrogen energy system preference index. A detailed procedure for determination of hydrogen energy system preference index is suggested. Two examples relating to hydrogen production processes and hydrogen energy technologies are cited in order to demonstrate and validate the effectiveness and flexibility of the proposed methodology. In each example, a list of all possible choices from the best to the worst alternatives is obtained taking into account different evaluation criteria.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2014 · International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy
  • Source
    • "Single used or combination of AHP and the Delphi technique can be found in literatures [19] [20] [21]. Firstly, Delphi is used to identify important factors or criteria from specialists. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An inexorable growth of energy demand, in particular the transportation sector, rapidly depletes fossil fuels. A number of conflicts of interest usually take place in terms of performance, emission and economic aspect. Each parameter has a different importance. Hence, researchers should have a methodology to weight each parameter to make appropriate decisive conclusions. In this research, an integrated AHP-Delphi method is developed or weighting nine diesel engine parameters. The result shows that AHP can convert a specialist’s perceptions into numerical values efficiently. The Delphi method can manage a diverse set of a specialist’s opinions and obtain the group consensus within a certain iteration. The final result reveals that fuel price, efficiency, particulate matter (PM), engine torque and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) receive a relatively high importance in a diesel engine’s parameters, while carbon dioxide (CO2), hydrocarbon (HC), engine power and carbon monoxide (CO) show less significance. The discussion, conclusion, and recommendation are also presented.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2013
Show more