The present study examines the spectral and temporal characteristics of Infant Directed Speech (IDS) vowels spoken to young children in the Indigenous Australian language Warlpiri. The results show that vowel hyperarticulation, temporal expansion and pitch raising are characteristics of Warlpiri IDS to children in the third year of life. The results also suggest that vowel space fronting may be a common strategy, and that vowel space and durational expansion may play a didactic role in IDS young children at an age characterised by rapid vocabulary expansion and increased multiword utterances The use and characteristics of special Infant and Child Directed Speech registers (IDS; CDS; or in older literature Baby Talk; Motherese) has been argued to be a supportive strategy adopted by carers (mothers, fathers, other carers, and older children) with the aim to scaffold language acquisition. Questions of the universality of IDS have received significant attention in the literature, and cross-linguistic research has demonstrated differences across languages and cultures, and on changes in the characteristics of IDS across development. The present study examines the spectral and temporal characteristics of IDS vowels spoken to young children in the Indigenous Australian language Warlpiri. The results show that vowel hyperarticulation, temporal expansion and pitch raising are characteristics of Warlpiri IDS to children in the early multiword stage of language acquisition and beyond. The results also suggest that vowel space fronting may be a common strategy observed in Warlpiri IDS, and that vowel space and durational expansion may play a particular didactic role in the speech to young children who are at an age where rapid vocabulary expansion is typical, as nouns appear to be the locus of the greatest IDS modifications. IDS is characterised by a slower speech rate, higher fundamental frequency, and greater pitch variations [1], longer pauses, often repetitive intonational structures [2], and shorter sentences with a more limited lexicon than Adult Directed Speech (ADS) [3]. IDS is also characterised by more hyperarticulation: vowels (and consonants) are often given articulatory/acoustically more extreme realisations, resulting in an expanded articulatory/acoustic vowel space, and increased acoustic/articulatory differentiation [4]. Such vowel hyperarticulation is also a feature of Foreigner Directed Speech (FDS: [5], but not Pet Directed Speech (PDS: [6] unless the pet is a parrot [7], suggesting that slow and clear speech is used as a didactic strategy in communication with individuals/entities who are perceived to be language learners (or at least capable of some language learning) but who are still learning. IDS has been hypothesised to serve a number of different functions, most likely simultaneously and to varying degrees at different developmental stages, including (1) regulating infant attention [8], [9], [10]; (2) communicating affect and supporting social interaction [11], [12], [13], and; (3) supporting language acquisition [14], [15], [16], [17], the latter of which is the focus here. Vowel hyperarticulation in IDS has been particularly highlighted as potentially facilitating certain aspects of language acquisition: in particular, segmental acquisition (the learning of vowels and consonants), and in word-learning. In particular for the first year of life, vowel hyperarticulation has been argued to enhance segmental learning, as argued by [18] by providing infants with input containing high-quality and maximally differentiated vowel tokens that infants might attend to preferentially, perhaps due to its prosodic characteristics, as discussed above. Not all studies have shown that all vowels are uniformly hyperarticulated: In at least one study [19], mothers were found to hypoarticulate back vowels. This was interpreted to make the articulation more visibly accessible to infants than they are in ADS and thus rather than representing a goal of target undershoot, it indicated enhancement in the visual domain (as opposed to the acoustic). In the second year of life, vowel hyperarticulation has been argued to be helpful in terms of word-learning, with research showing that the degree of vowel hyperarticulation in the maternal input at 18 months of age is correlated with the size of the receptive and productive language at 24 months of age [20]. This suggests that extra clarity in the phonemic specifications of words in IDS supports the acquisition of new vocabulary items. Other research has shown that IDS increases neural activity in 6-and 13-month-old infants compared to ADS, which again is argued to assist with the 'word spotting' of young word learners [21]. It is possible that increased neural activity also reflects recognition of being a potential addressee of IDS utterances [22], particularly in older infants and children. The findings in [20] are, however, also consistent with results showing that IDS vowel hyperarticulation (but not an enhanced pitch range) plays an important role in word recognition and word learning. And in one word recognition study, vowel hyperarticulation improved 19-month-olds' performance in word recognition tasks [23]. In another study, using a word learning paradigm, [24] showed that 21-month-olds learned new words only in IDS unless they already had large vocabularies, while 27-month-old toddlers learned new words in both ADS and IDS. The acoustic characteristics of IDS, however, are not stable across early development [25], [26], [27]. This is generally taken to indicate that carers finetune their IDS to the