ArticlePDF Available

Mycoinsecticides and Mycoacaricides: A comprehensive list with worldwide coverage and international classification of formulation types

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

A substantial number of mycoinsecticides and mycoacaricides have been developed worldwide since the 1960s. Here we present an updated, comprehensive list of these products. At least 12 species or subspecies (varieties) of fungi have been employed as active ingredients of mycoinsecticides and mycoacaricides for inundative and inoculative applications, although some are no longer in use. Products based on Beauveria bassiana (33.9%), Metarhizium anisopliae (33.9%), Isaria fumosorosea (5.8%), and B. brongniartii (4.1%) are the most common among the 171 products presented in this paper. Approximately 75% of all listed products are currently registered, undergoing registration or commercially available (in some cases without registration), whereas 15% are no longer available. We were unable to determine the status of the remaining 10%. Insects in the orders Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, Thysanoptera, and Orthoptera comprise most of the targets, distributed among at least 48 families. A total of 28 products are claimed to control acarines (mites and ticks) in at least 4 families, although only three products (all based on Hirsutella thompsonii) were exclusively developed as acaricides. Eleven different technical grade active ingredients or formulation types have been identified, with technical concentrates (fungus-colonized substrates) (26.3%), wettable powders (20.5%) and oil dispersions (15.2%) being most common. Approximately 43% of all products were developed by South American companies and institutions. Currently, what may be the largest single microbial control program using fungi involves the use of M. anisopliae for control of spittlebugs (Cercopidae) in South American sugarcane and pastures.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Perspective
Mycoinsecticides and Mycoacaricides: A comprehensive list
with worldwide coverage and international classification of
formulation types
q
Marcos R. de Faria
a,b,*
, Stephen P. Wraight
c
a
Cornell University, Department of Entomology, Comstock Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-2601, USA
b
Embrapa Recursos Gene
´ticos e Biotecnologia, Caixa Postal 02372, Brası
´lia, DF 70849-970, Brazil
c
USDA-ARS, Plant, Soil and Nutrition Laboratory, Ithaca, NY 14850-2901, USA
Received 2 May 2007; accepted 6 August 2007
Available online 17 August 2007
Abstract
A substantial number of mycoinsecticides and mycoacaricides have been developed worldwide since the 1960s. Here we present an
updated, comprehensive list of these products. At least 12 species or subspecies (varieties) of fungi have been employed as active ingre-
dients of mycoinsecticides and mycoacaricides for inundative and inoculative applications, although some are no longer in use. Products
based on Beauveria bassiana (33.9%), Metarhizium anisopliae (33.9%), Isaria fumosorosea (5.8%), and B. brongniartii (4.1%) are the most
common among the 171 products presented in this paper. Approximately 75% of all listed products are currently registered, undergoing
registration or commercially available (in some cases without registration), whereas 15% are no longer available. We were unable to
determine the status of the remaining 10%. Insects in the orders Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, Thysanoptera, and Orthoptera
comprise most of the targets, distributed among at least 48 families. A total of 28 products are claimed to control acarines (mites
and ticks) in at least 4 families, although only three products (all based on Hirsutella thompsonii) were exclusively developed as acaricides.
Eleven different technical grade active ingredients or formulation types have been identified, with technical concentrates (fungus-colo-
nized substrates) (26.3%), wettable powders (20.5%) and oil dispersions (15.2%) being most common. Approximately 43% of all products
were developed by South American companies and institutions. Currently, what may be the largest single microbial control program
using fungi involves the use of M. anisopliae for control of spittlebugs (Cercopidae) in South American sugarcane and pastures.
Ó2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Entomopathogenic fungi; Mycopesticides; Mycoinsecticides; Mycoacaricides; Formulations; Microbial control; Augmentation; IPM
1. Introduction
The first attempt to control a pest with a fungal agent
was carried out in Russia in 1888, when the fungus now
known as Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschn.) Sorokın was
mass produced on beer mash and sprayed in the field for
control of the beet weevil Cleonus punctiventris (Germar)
(Lord, 2005). Boverin, a Beauveria bassiana-based mycoin-
secticide for control of the Colorado potato beetle and cod-
ling moth in the former USSR, was developed in 1965
(Kendrick, 2000). Mycar, a mycoacaricide based on Hirsu-
tella thompsonii Fisher, was granted a full registration by
the US Environmental Protection Agency in 1981 for con-
trol of the citrus rust mite, Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ash-
mead), in the United States (McCoy, 1986). Research and
development efforts have increased markedly in recent
years, and a considerable number of fungus-based biopes-
ticides have been developed for control of insects and
1049-9644/$ - see front matter Ó2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.08.001
q
The USDA (USA), Cornell University (USA) and EMBRAPA (Brazil)
neither guarantees nor warrants the quality and claims of the commercial
products mentioned in this paper, and the use of the name by USDA/
Cornell University/EMBRAPA implies no approval of products.
*
Corresponding author. Address: Cornell University, Department of
Entomology, Comstock Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-2601, USA. Fax: +1 607
255 1132.
E-mail address: mrf39@cornell.edu (M.R. de Faria).
www.elsevier.com/locate/ybcon
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256
acarines (mites and ticks) in agricultural, urban, forest,
livestock and aquatic environments. In the following dis-
cussion, these mycoinsecticides/mycoacaricides will be
referred to as mycopesticides, a term that also embraces
other fungal biological products not considered in this
paper, such as mycoherbicides and mycofungicides.
There are many recent reviews discussing the efficacy,
contemporary advances, future trends, and regulatory
aspects of mycopesticides (Copping and Menn, 2000;
Neale, 2000; Inglis et al., 2001; Wraight et al., 2001; Cast-
rillo et al., 2005). Although numerous lists of developed
mycopesticides are available (Tengerdy and Szaka
´cs,
1998; Butt et al., 1999; Butt and Copping, 2000; Hajek
et al., 2001; Stewart, 2001; Wraight et al., 2001; Leite
et al., 2003a; Copping, 2004; Hynes and Boyetchko,
2006), many of these are deficient, especially in terms of
worldwide coverage.
This study aimed to assemble a comprehensive list of
mycopesticides developed worldwide over the last four dec-
ades. In addition, we have attempted to review and stan-
dardize the nomenclature of formulation types so far
employed for these biocontrol agents. Use of fungal agents
through conservation and classical biological control strat-
egies is discussed elsewhere (Pell et al., 2001; Hajek et al.,
2003; Shah and Pell, 2003).
2. Products and formulations
A complete list of mycopesticides for insect and acarine
control from different regions of the globe was prepared
from information obtained from a variety of sources. In
addition to scientific publications, an array of technical
publications, personal communications, company bro-
chures, and websites, including those of manufacturers
and governmental agencies, were used. Websites were
accessed during the period between October, 2005 and Sep-
tember, 2006, and personal communications were obtained
through April, 2007.
2.1. Fungal products
For the purpose of this paper, mycopesticides are
defined as products based on living fungal propagules
intended to control pests through inundative or inoculative
applications. Propagule types present in most products are
classified as hyphae (mycelia), blastospores, or conidia.
When the information could be found, conidia were further
characterized as aerial or submerged conidia. When avail-
able information was insufficient to identify conidia versus
blastospores, the propagules were listed simply as asexual
spores. Target pests were identified to order and, when pos-
sible, to family. The diverse insects in the order Hemiptera
were identified also to suborder. The classification of
insects follows Triplehorn and Johnson (2005).
Our work presents a comprehensive list of mycopesti-
cides that are registered, undergoing registration or mar-
keted, in some cases without being registered. A few
preparations developed but never registered or commer-
cialized, such as the ultra-low volume suspension of
Mycotrol-OF, are also considered. Mycopesticides com-
mercialized without registration and, in the other extreme,
registered products that currently are not being commer-
cialized, are included in the list of products as well. Names
of manufacturers are listed according to best available
information. However, due to difficulties in tracking the
ever-changing relationships among companies, the manu-
facturer’s names mentioned may in some cases refer to
licensees or distributors that do not operate manufacturing
facilities.
Products with no trade names (usually products under-
going a registration process or unformulated materials sold
directly to end users) are included when it was possible to
determine that they were commercialized for at least some
period of time. For this reason, some names (or lack
thereof) might be provisional. Products distributed without
charge or sold at subsidized prices to end users by non-
profit organizations, such as grower associations, as well
as mycopesticides derived from on-farm production are
not included. Technical products used solely for formula-
tion of end-products also are not listed, e.g., Troy Boverin,
Technical Laginex, PFR-97 MUP, and others. Finally,
although molecular systematics studies have shown the
proximity of microsporidians to zygomycete fungi (Edlind
et al., 1996; Keeling, 2003), these microorganisms were not
considered in this paper.
2.2. Fungal formulations
We have attempted to identify formulation types based
on the CropLife International two-letter coding system
for technical and formulated pesticides (CropLife Interna-
tional, 2002). The international coding system defines
approximately 100 different formulation types for pesti-
cides in general, and most of the formulation types
described for the mycopesticides listed herein can be classi-
fied within this system. In a few cases, we found it difficult
to match existing mycopesticide formulations with the for-
mulation types defined by the international code. In these
cases we have selected the defined type of formulation that
best fits the mycopesticide and have added brief notations
on specific incongruities. Some of the definitions we present
also incorporate slightly modified definitions used by FAO/
WHO (2002) to describe biopesticides based on entomo-
pathogenic bacteria. Wording taken directly from the
CropLife International (2002) or FAO/WHO (2002) defini-
tions are presented in italics and quotation marks. Defini-
tions are from the CropLife International coding system
unless otherwise indicated.
2.2.1. Technical grade active ingredients (Technical
products)
FAO/WHO (2002) applies the generic term technical
grade active ingredient to both technical material and tech-
nical concentrate.
238 M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256
Technical material (TC). ‘‘An active ingredient isolated
(as far as is practicable) from the starting materials, sol-
vents, etc., used to produce it’’ (FAO/WHO, 2002). For
entomopathogenic fungi, the starting materials are usually
the liquid or solid culture substrates. Technical materials
are usually the basis for all other formulation types,
although in some circumstances they may be used as end-
products. According to the CropLife definition, technical
materials may include ‘‘associated impurities and small
amounts of necessary additives.’’ Purification ‘‘as far as
practicable’’ is generally considered to result in impurity
residues comprising <10% of the product weight (T. S.
Woods, Chair, Specifications Expert Group, CropLife
International, personal communication). In our under-
standing, conidia or other propagule types isolated from
the culture together with associated impurities would fall
into this category, also referred to as technical powder
(Burges and Jones, 1998).
Technical concentrate (TK). A material consisting of the
active ingredient together with related byproducts of the
production process and free of any added modifying agents
except for small amounts of stabilizers and free-flow
agents, if necessary. This definition is a slight modification
of the definition presented by FAO/WHO (2002) for bacte-
rial technical concentrates. According to FAO/WHO, a
TK should also be free of ‘‘visible extraneous matter’’,
but the term extraneous matter is not defined, and in our
judgment, the FAO/WHO definition fits fungal biopesti-
cides that include components of the spent culture media,
e.g., fungus-colonized cereal grains or whole-culture
broths. In these cases, there have been no attempts to sep-
arate the active ingredient from the substrate. Included in
this category, fungus-colonized solid substrates may con-
tain variable proportions of sporulating mycelia and
spores, depending on factors such as age of culture and
batch. In some countries they are routinely used as
end-products through direct incorporation into soil. Alter-
natively, the active ingredient may be extracted before
application (e.g., by washing and sieving, often with the
aid of surfactants). In our paper, for all technical concen-
trates based on solid substrates we consider the propagule
type as being conidia + hyphae (C+H), although fre-
quently the vast majority of propagules at the time of sale
may be either spores or hyphae. For products produced in
liquid media, mixtures of submerged conidia, blastospores,
or hyphae may be present.
2.2.2. Formulation types
Wettable powder (WP). ‘‘A powder formulation to be
applied as a suspension after dispersion in water.’’ In our
understanding, WP formulations must be ready-to-use.
Thus, products such as hydrophobic technical materials that
do not include additives that render them miscible in water
(such as surfactants or clays) would not fall in this category.
Granule (GR). ‘‘A free-flowing solid formulation of a
defined granule size range ready for use.’’ Although techni-
cal concentrates comprising microbe-colonized granular
substrates may resemble and function as granular formula-
tions, the term granule generally refers to more elaborated
formulations with particles of controlled and uniform size
and with the active ingredient strongly adhered to or incor-
porated into the granule. Thus, fungus-colonized cereal
grains are not included under this definition.
Bait (ready for use) (RB). ‘‘A formulation designed to
attract and be eaten by the target pests.’’ This definition is
generally applicable to mycopesticides; however, because
most fungal pathogens infect their hosts via direct penetra-
tion of the cuticle, ingestion may be of little consequence,
and baits may therefore be based on attractants other than
food.
Water dispersible granule (WG). ‘‘A formulation
consisting of granules to be applied after disintegration and
dispersion in water.’’
Contact powder (CP). ‘‘Insecticidal formulation in pow-
der form for direct application.’’ Free-flowing powders suit-
able for dusting are termed dustable powders (DP) under
the CropLife International coding system. However, other
than a few early preparations produced by nonprofit orga-
nizations, we did not identify any mycoinsecticides formu-
lated specifically for broadcast application as dusts. Thus,
we have categorized all powders that do not fit any of
the previously mentioned formulation types as contact
powders.
Suspension concentrate (=flowable concentrate) (SC).
‘‘A stable suspension of active ingredient(s) in water,
intended for dilution with water before use.’’
Oil miscible flowable concentrate (=oil miscible suspen-
sion) (OF). ‘‘A stable suspension of active ingredient(s) in
a fluid intended for dilution in an organic liquid before use.’’
Ultra-low volume (ULV) suspension (SU). ‘‘A suspen-
sion ready for use through ULV equipment.’’
Oil dispersion (OD). ‘‘A stable suspension of active ingre-
dient(s) in a water-immiscible fluid, which may contain other
dissolved active ingredient(s), intended for dilution in water
before use.’’ In practice, oil dispersions contain emulsifiers
to render the mixture miscible in water for spraying (T.
S. Woods, personal communication). The word ‘‘stable’’
in this and other of the abovementioned formulations indi-
cates that the active ingredient does not settle out to a non-
resuspendable cake during storage (T. S. Woods, personal
communication). Here, we consider the definition to
include suspensions that tend to settle, but which are
designed to be readily resuspendable by the user via man-
ual agitation. Oil dispersions of entomopathogenic fungi
have been referred to most commonly in the literature as
emulsifiable suspensions or emulsifiable oil suspensions
and identified by the abbreviation ES. However, under
the Croplife International code, the abbreviation ES refers
to emulsions for seed treatments.
3. Overview of mycopesticides
Mycoinsecticides and mycoacaricides are listed alpha-
betically by genus and species in Table 1. To date, at least
M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256 239
12 species or subspecies (varieties) of fungi have been
employed as the active ingredients in these products. This
number will likely increase into the foreseeable future as
molecular studies reveal cryptic species within large genera.
Classifications at the generic level are also undergoing
rapid change. In this work, we have adopted those recent
taxonomic changes that we view as strongly supported in
the published literature. Most notably, insect pathogenic
fungi previously classified as Verticillium spp. have been
placed in a new genus, Lecanicillium (Gams and Zare,
2001; Zare and Gams, 2001), and many insect pathogenic
Paecilomyces species (including P. fumosoroseus) have been
transferred to the genus Isaria (Hodge et al., 2005;
Luangsa-Ard et al., 2005). Some species identified in the
table are in urgent need of additional taxonomic work.
Recent molecular studies, for example, indicate that iso-
lates of fungi identified as Sporothrix insectorum de Hoog
& H.C.Evans, currently used in Brazil for control of the
lace bug Leptopharsa heveae Drake & Poor in rubber tree
plantations, belong to more than one species and are not
true Sporothrix species (K.T. Hodge, Cornell University,
personal communication). In the realm of commerce, an
unfortunate outcome of taxonomic revision is the emer-
gence of disparities between the names of products and
the fungi upon which they are based (as many product
trade names are derived from the scientific names of their
active ingredients). Product developers should consult fun-
gal systematists before naming their products.
For most fungal species/subspecies listed, there is at
least one product that is currently registered (or undergo-
ing registration), or marketed; however, a few species are
apparently no longer commercially available. These include
Aschersonia aleyrodis Webber and Nomuraea rileyi (Farl.)
Samson (the availability of the only listed N. rileyi product
could not be determined). Lagenidium giganteum Couch is
registered but not currently available. With the exception
of one species in the phylum Zygomycota and another in
the kingdom Chromista (=Stramenipila or Straminopila),
all agents comprising this list are anamorphic fungi. B. bas-
siana (Bals.) Vuill., M. anisopliae (Metschn.) Sorokın, Isa-
ria fumosorosea Wize, Beauveria brongniartii (Sacc.) Petch,
and Lecanicillium spp., are the main active ingredients of
listed products. We believe that approximately two-thirds
of all listed products are currently registered, undergoing
registration or marketed.
During the last four decades, over 80 companies world-
wide have developed 171 mycoinsecticides and mycoacari-
cides (Table 2). This contrasts sharply with the situation
less than three decades ago, when only one commercial
mycoinsecticide was available (Ignoffo and Anderson,
Table 1
Fungal species and varieties developed into mycoinsecticides/mycoacaricides and their commercial status
Species/Varieties
a,b
No. Products Commercial status
c
Active Inactive ND
Fungi: Anamorphic Hypocreales
Aschersonia aleyrodis Webber 1 (0.6%) 0 1 0
Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. 58 (33.9%) 45 9 4
Beauveria brongniartii (Sacc.) Petch 7 (4.1%) 5 0 2
Hirsutella thompsonii F.E.Fisher 3 (1.8%) 1 1 1
Isaria fumosorosea Wize 10 (5.8%) 7 1 2
Isaria sp. 1 (0.6%) 1 0 0
Lecanicillium longisporum (Petch) R.Zare & W.Gams 2 (1.2%) 2 0 0
Lecanicillium muscarium (Petch) R.Zare & W.Gams 3 (1.8%) 3 0 0
Lecanicillium sp. 11 (6.4%) 10 0 1
Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschn.) Sorokın 58 (33.9%) 44 10 4
Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum Driver & Milner 3 (1.8%) 3 0 0
Nomuraea rileyi (Farl.) Samson 1 (0.6%) 0 0 1
Fungi: Anamorphic species identified as
Sporothrix insectorum de Hoog & H.C.Evans
d
3 (1.8%) 2 1 0
Fungi: Zygomycota: Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales
Conidiobolus thromboides Drechsler 2 (1.2%) 1 1 0
Chromista: Oomycota: Oomycetes: Pythiales
Lagenidium giganteum Couch 1 (0.6%) 1
e
00
Mixes (2 or more species) 7 (4.1%) 4 1 2
TOTAL 171 (100%) 129 (75.4%) 25 (14.6%) 17 (9.9%)
a
Fungal classification based on Kirk et al. (2001).
b
Scientific names according to database Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org/).
c
Availability of product is informed as follows: Active, product currently registered, undergoing registration or available (commercially or upon
request) in the period between October/2005 and May/2006; Inactive, product no longer available in the market (or developed but never submitted to
registration or marketed); ND, current status of product could not be determined.
d
Further identification of commercial isolates required since isolates are not true Sporothrix.
e
Registered but not currently commercialized.
240 M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256
Table 2
Fungi developed for control of insects and acarines. List organized by fungal species and within each species by region (Europe, Africa, Asia, Oceania,
North America, Central America, and South America). Within each regin, countries are listed in alphabetical order
Country(ies)
where
undergoing
registration,
registered or
marketed
Trade name
a
Propagule(s)/
Formulation
b
Claimed Target(s)
(Orders and Families)
Manufacturer Source(s)
c
Aschersonia aleyrodis
Former USSR Aseronia
**
C/TC Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae) Gosagroprom, Former USSR Ignoffo and Anderson (1979),
M. Shternshis (personal
communication)
Beauveria bassiana
Czech Republic Boverol
**
(=Boverol-
Spofa)
C/WP Coleoptera (Chrysomelidae) Fytovita, Czech Republic Kreutz et al. (2004),Wraight
et al. (2001), Z. Adame
´k
(personal communication)
Czech Republic Boverosil
**
C/WP (alone
or combined
with chemical
pesticides)
Coleoptera (Curculionidae) +
other stored-product pests (not
specified)
NI Feng et al. (1994), Hluchy
´and
Sams
ˇin
ˇa
´kova
´(1989), Z. Adame
´k
(personal communication)
France Ostrinil
**
C+H/TK Lepidoptera (Crambidae) Natural Plant Protection (NPP),
France
Wraight et al. (2001), Shah and
Goettel (1999)
Spain Trichobass-L
*
C/OD Coleoptera (Curculionidae,
Scarabaeidae), Lepidoptera
(Castniidae, Pieridae),
Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae),
Thysanoptera (Thripidae) +
Acari (Tetranychidae)
Trichodex S.A., Spain Website
1
Spain Trichobass-P
*
C/WP Coleoptera (Curculionidae,
Scarabaeidae), Hemiptera
(Aleyrodidae) + Acari
(Tetranychidae)
Trichodex S.A., Spain Website
1
South Africa Bb Plus
*
A/WP Hemiptera (Aphididae) +
Acari (Tetranychidae)
Biological Control Products SA
(Pty) Ltd, South Africa
Website
2
South Africa Bb Weevil
*
A/CP Coleoptera (Curculionidae) Biological Control Products SA
(Pty) Ltd, South Africa
Website
2
India BioGuard
Rich
*
A/NI Coleoptera (Curculionidae,
Scarabaeidae), Hemiptera
(Aleyrodidae, Aphididae),
Lepidoptera (Crambidae),
Thysanoptera (Thripidae)
Plantrich Chemicals &
Biofertilizers Ltd, India
Website
3
India Bio-Power
*
A/WP Coleoptera (Curculionidae,
Scarabaeidae), Hemiptera:
Auchenorrhyncha
(Cicadellidae, Delphacidae),
Lepidoptera (Plutellidae)
T.Stanes & Company Limited,
India
Copping (2004), Website
4
India Racer
*
A/WP Lepidoptera (Noctuidae) +
others (not specified)
Agri Life, India Copping (2004), Website
5
Japan Biolisa-
Madara
*
C+H/TK
(fiber band)
Coleptera (Cerambycidae) Nitto Denko, Japan M. Shimazu (personal
communication)
Russia Boverin
*
B/WP Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae),
Thysanoptera (Thripidae) +
Acari (Tetranychidae)
Biodron, Russia Shternshis (2004), M. Shternshis
(personal communication)
Russia Boverin
*
B/NI (liquid
suspension)
Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae),
Thysanoptera (Thripidae) +
Acari (Tetranychidae)
Biodron, Russia Shternshis (2004), M. Shternshis
(personal communication)
Former USSR Boverin
**
C or S+B/WP
(alone or
combined with
chemical
insecticides)
Coleoptera (Chrysomelidae),
Lepidoptera (Tortricidae)
Glavmikrobioprom, Former
USSR
Feng et al. (1994), Ferron (1981),
Ignoffo and Anderson (1979)
Mexico Bea-Sin
*
C/WP Coleoptera (Curculionidae,
Scarabaeidae), Hemiptera
(Aleyrodidae)
Agrobiologicos del Noroeste
S.A. de C.V. (Agrobionsa),
Mexico
Wraight et al. (2001), A. Paez
(personal communication),
Company brochure
(continued on next page)
M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256 241
Table 2 (continued)
Country(ies)
where
undergoing
registration,
registered or
marketed
Trade name
a
Propagule(s)/
Formulation
b
Claimed Target(s)
(Orders and Families)
Manufacturer Source(s)
c
Mexico Bea-Sin
*
C/OD Coleoptera (Curculionidae,
Scarabaeidae), Hemiptera
(Aleyrodidae)
Agrobiologicos del Noroeste
S.A. de C.V. (Agrobionsa),
Mexico
A. Paez (personal
communication), Company
brochure
Mexico Bio-Fung
*
A/NI Orthoptera Centro de Sanidad Vegetal de
Guanajuato (CESAVEG),
Mexico
Guerra et al. (2001), P. Guerra
(personal communication)
USA Baits Motel Stay
Awhile-Rest
Forever
*
(previously: Healthy
Indoors Brand, Ant
and Cockroach Bait
Station)
C/RB Hymenoptera (Formicidae) GlycoGenesys, Inc., USA
(previously: SafeScience, Inc.,
USA)
Website
6
, R. Pereira (personal
communication)
USA Balence
*
C/OD Diptera (Muscidae) Jabb of the Carolinas Inc.,
USA
Kaufman et al. (2005), Website
6
,
L. Castrillo (personal
communication)
USA,
Mexico,
Denmark,
Italy, Spain,
Sweden,
Japan
BotaniGard ES
*
C/ OD Coleoptera (Curculionidae,
Scarabaeidae), Hemiptera
(Miridae, Aleyrodidae,
Aphididae, Pseudococcidae,
Psyllidae), Thysanoptera
(Thripidae)
Laverlam International
Corporation, USA (previously:
Emerald BioAgriculture Corp.,
USA; Mycotech Corp., USA)
Kabaluk and Gazdik (2005),
Wraight et al. (2001), Website
7
USA,
Mexico,
Denmark,
Italy, Spain,
Sweden,
Japan
BotaniGard 22 WP
*
C/WP Coleoptera (Curculionidae,
Scarabaeidae), Hemiptera
(Miridae, Cicadellidae,
Fulgoridae, Aleyrodidae,
Aphididae, Pseudococcidae,
Psyllidae), Thysanoptera
(Thripidae)
Laverlam International
Corporation, USA (previously:
Emerald BioAgriculture Corp.,
USA; Mycotech Corp., USA)
Kabaluk and Gazdik (2005),
Wraight et al. (2001), Website
7
,
Company brochure
USA CornGard
**
C/GR Lepidoptera (Crambidae) Mycotech Corp., USA Hajek et al. (2001), Shah and
Goettel (1999)
USA,
Mexico,
Denmark,
Italy,
Sweden
Mycotrol ES
*
C/OD Coleoptera (Chrysomelidae,
Curculionidae, Scarabaeidae),
Hemiptera (Miridae,
Cicadellidae, Fulgoridae,
Aleyrodidae, Aphididae,
Pseudococcidae, Psyllidae),
Lepidoptera (Crambidae),
Orthoptera (Acrididae,
Tettigoniidae), Thysanoptera
(Thripidae)
Laverlam International
Corporation, USA (previously:
Emerald BioAgriculture Corp.,
USA; Mycotech Corp., USA)
Kabaluk and Gazdik (2005),
Wraight et al. (2001), Website
7
USA,
Mexico,
Denmark,
Italy,
Sweden
Mycotrol-O
*
C/OD Coleoptera (Chrysomelidae,
Curculionidae, Scarabaeidae),
Hemiptera (Miridae,
Cicadellidae, Fulgoridae,
Aleyrodidae, Aphididae,
Pseudococcidae, Psyllidae),
Lepidoptera (Crambidae,
Noctuidae, Pieridae, Plutellidae),
Orthoptera (Acrididae,
Tettigoniidae), Thysanoptera
(Thripidae)
Laverlam International
Corporation, USA (previously:
Emerald BioAgriculture Corp.,
USA; Mycotech Corp., USA)
Website
7
, Company brochure
USA Mycotrol OF
**
C/SU Orthoptera (Acrididae,
Tettigoniidae)
Mycotech Corp., USA S. Jaronski (personal
communication)
USA Mycotrol OF
**
C/OD (also
for ULV
applications)
Orthoptera (Acrididae,
Tettigoniidae)
Mycotech Corp., USA S. Jaronski (personal
communication)
242 M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256
Table 2 (continued)
Country(ies)
where
undergoing
registration,
registered or
marketed
Trade name
a
Propagule(s)/
Formulation
b
Claimed Target(s)
(Orders and Families)
Manufacturer Source(s)
c
USA, Mexico,
Denmark, Italy,
Sweden
Mycotrol WP
*
C/WP Coleoptera (Chrysomelidae,
Curculionidae, Scarabaeidae),
Hemiptera (Miridae,
Cicadellidae, Fulgoridae,
Aleyrodidae, Aphididae,
Pseudococcidae, Psyllidae),
Thysanoptera (Thripidae),
Lepidoptera (Crambidae),
Orthoptera (Acrididae,
Tettigoniidae)
Emerald BioAgriculture Corp.,
USA (previously: Mycotech
Corp., USA)
Kabaluk and Gazdik (2005),
Wraight et al. (2001), Website
6
USA, Mexico,
Greece, Italy,
Spain,
Switzerland
Naturalis L
*
(=Fermone
Naturalis L-225)
C/OD Coleoptera (Chrysomelidae,
Curculionidae, Scarabaeidae),
Diptera (Ephydridae,
Mycetophilidae, Sciaridae,
Tipulidae), Hemiptera
(Lygaeidae, Miridae, Cercopidae,
Cicadellidae, Aleyrodidae,
Aphididae, Pseudococcidae,
Psyllidae), Hymenoptera
(Formicidae), Lepidoptera
(Crambidae, Gelechiidae,
Geometridae, Noctuidae,
Tortricidae), Orthoptera
(Acrididae, Gryllotalpidae),
Thysanoptera (Thripidae) +
Acari (Eriophyidae,
Tetranychidae) + Crustacea +
Diplopoda
Troy Biosciences Inc., USA Kabaluk and Gazdik (2005),
Website
6,8
, K. Moran (personal
communication), Company
brochure
USA Naturalis L—
Home &
Garden
*
C/OD Coleoptera (Chrysomelidae,
Curculionidae, Scarabaeidae),
Hymenoptera (Formicidae),
Diptera (Tipulidae), Hemiptera
(Lygaeidae, Cercopidae,
Cicadellidae, Aleyrodidae,
Aphididae, Pseudococcidae,
Psyllidae), Lepidoptera
(Crambidae, Geometridae,
Noctuidae), Orthoptera
(Acrididae, Gryllotalpidae),
Thysanoptera (Thripidae) +
Acari (Tarsonemidae,
Tetranychidae) + Crustacea +
Diplopoda
Troy Biosciences Inc., USA Website
8
, K. Moran (personal
communication), Company
brochure
USA Naturalis-O
**
C/OD Coleoptera (Chrysomelidae,
Curculionidae), Hemiptera
(Miridae, Cicadellidae,
Aleyrodidae, Aphididae,
Psyllidae), Lepidoptera,
Thysanoptera (Thripidae)
Troy Biosciences Inc., USA Company brochure
USA Organigard
Emulsifiable
Suspension
Mycoinsecticide
*
C/OD Coleoptera (Chrysomelidae,
Curculionidae, Scarabaeidae),
Hemiptera (Miridae,
Cicadellidae, Aleyrodidae,
Aphididae, Pseudococcidae,
Psyllidae), Thysanoptera
(Thripidae), Orthoptera
(Acrididae, Tettigoniidae),
Lepidoptera (Crambidae)
Emerald BioAgriculture Corp.,
USA (previously: Mycotech
Corp., USA)
Hajek et al. (2001), Website
6
(continued on next page)
M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256 243
Table 2 (continued)
Country(ies) where
undergoing
registration,
registered or
marketed
Trade name
a
Propagule(s)/
Formulation
b
Claimed Target(s)
(Orders and Families)
Manufacturer Source(s)
c
Costa Rica,
Panama
Beauvedieca
*
C+H/TK Coleoptera (Curculionidae) Liga Agricola Industrial de La
Can
˜a de Azucar (LAICA), Costa
Rica
Website
9
Costa Rica,
Panama
Beauvedieca
*
C/NI Coleoptera (Curculionidae) Liga Agricola Industrial de La
Can
˜a de Azucar (LAICA), Costa
Rica
Website
9
Costa Rica Nativo 2 SC
*
A/NI Coleoptera (Curculionidae) Bayer Cropscience S.A.,
Colombia
W. Solano (personal
communication), Website
10
Guatemala Bichoxe
***
A/NI Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae) Produtos Ecolo
´gicos, Guatemala Alves et al. (2003)
Honduras, El
Salvador,
Guatemala,
Jamaica,
Nicaragua
Bazam
*
CWP Coleoptera (Chrysomelidae,
Curculionidae), Hemiptera
(Aleyrodidae, Aphididae),
Lepidoptera (Noctuidae,
Plutellidae) + Acari
(Tetranychidae)
Escuela Agrı
´cola Panamericana,
Honduras
Website
9
, R. Trabanino
(personal communication)
Nicaragua Mirabiol
*
C+H/TK Coleoptera (Curculionidae) Union de Cooperativas
Agropecuarias (UCA),
Nicaragua
Website
9
Argentina Bb
Vinchuca
*
C/OD Hemiptera (Reduviidae) Laboratorios Biagro S.A.,
Argentina
R. Lecuona (personal
communication)
Argentina Bb Moscas
*
C/OD Diptera (Muscidae) Laboratorios Biagro S.A.,
Argentina
R. Lecuona (personal
communication)
Argentina Bb Moscas
*
C/RB Diptera (Muscidae) Laboratorios Biagro S.A.,
Argentina
R. Lecuona (personal
communication)
Brazil Bovenat
*
C+H/TK Coleoptera (Curculionidae),
Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae)
Natural Rural, Brazil Website
11
Brazil Boveril WP
ESALQ447
*
C+H/TK Coleoptera (Curculionidae) Itaforte Industrial de
BioProdutos Agro-Florestais
Ltda., Brazil
R. Lopes (personal
communication)
Brazil Boveril WP
PL63
*
C+H/TK Coleoptera (Curculionidae) +
Acari (Tetranychidae)
Itaforte Industrial de
BioProdutos Agro-Florestais
Ltda., Brazil
A. Ballarotti (personal
communication), R. Lopes
(personal communication)
Brazil Boveriol
*
C+H/TK Isoptera (Rhinotermitidae,
Termitidae)
Tecnicontrol Ind. e Com. de
Produtos Biolo
´gicos Ltda., Brazil
Leite et al. (2003b), J. Almeida
(personal communication)
Brazil No trade
name
*
C+H/TK Coleoptera (Curculionidae) Empresa Pernambucana de
Pesquisa Agropecua
´ria (IPA),
Brazil
E. Marques (personal
communication)
Brazil No trade
name
**
C+H/TK Hymenoptera (Formicidae),
Siphonaptera (Pulicidae)
Instituto de Biotecnologia
Rangel Ltda. (Inbioter), Brazil
D. Rangel (personal
communication)
Brazil No trade
name
*
C+H/TK Coleoptera (Curculionidae) Toyobo do Brasil Ltda., Brazil J. Almeida (personal
communication)
Brazil Bovemax
*
C/OD Coleoptera (Cerambycidae) Turfal Ind. Com. Prod. Biol.,
Brazil
M.S. Leite (personal
communication)
Colombia Ago
Biocontrol
Bassiana
50
***
C/NI Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera,
Lepidoptera
Ago Biocontrol, Colombia Shah and Goettel (1999)
Colombia Agronova
*
A/NI Coleoptera (Curculionidae,
Scarabaeidae), Lepidoptera
(Noctuidae, Nymphalidae,
Sphingidae)
Live Systems Technology S.A.,
Colombia
Website
12
Colombia Baubassil
*
C/NI Coleoptera, Hemiptera,
Lepidoptera
Productos Biolo
´gicos Perkins
Ltda, Colombia
Website
13
Colombia,
Dominican
Republic
Bauveril
*
A/WP Coleoptera (Curculionidae,
Scarabaeidae), Lepidoptera
(Castniidae)
Laverlam S.A., Colombia Alves et al. (2003), Website
14
Colombia BioExpert
*
A/NI Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae),
Thysanoptera (Thripidae)
Live Systems Technology S.A.,
Colombia
Website
12
244 M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256
Table 2 (continued)
Country(ies)
where undergoing
registration,
registered or
marketed
Trade name
a
Propagule(s)/
Formulation
b
Claimed Target(s)
(Orders and Families)
Manufacturer Source(s)
c
Colombia, Peru,
Costa Rica,
Dominican
Republic,
Honduras
Brocaril 50
WP
*
A/WP Coleoptera (Curculionidae) Laverlam S.A., Colombia Alves et al. (2003), Website
9,14,15
Colombia Brocavec
*
NI NI Empresa Colombiana de
Productos Veterniarios Vecol
S.A., Colombia
Website
16
Colombia Cebiopest
*
NI NI Fundacion Centro de
Biotecnologia Mariano Ospina
Perez, Colombia
Website
16
Colombia Conidia
***
C/WG Coleoptera (Curculionidae) Hoechst Schering AgrEvo,
Colombia
Stetter and Lieb (2000), Wraight
and Carruthers (1999)
Venezuela Proecol
***
C/NI Lepidoptera (Noctuidae) Probioagro S.A., Venezuela Hajek et al. (2001), Wraight et al.
(2001)
Beauveria brongniartii
Austria, Italy Melocont-
Pilzgerste
*
(=Beauveria
brong)
C+H/TK Coleoptera (Scarabaeidae) Kwizda Agro GmbH, Austria/
Agrifutur s.r.l., Italy
Henke et al. (2002), Wraight
et al. (2001), H. Strasser
(personal communication)
Switzerland Beauveria
brongniartii
Myzel
*
C+H/TK Coleoptera (Scarabaeidae) LBBZ Arenenberg, Switzerland S. Keller (personal
communication)
Switzerland Beauveria
Schweizer
*
C+H/TK Coleoptera (Scarabaeidae) Eric Schweizer Samen AG,
Switzerland
Shah and Pell (2003), Butt and
Copping (2000)
Switzerland Engerlingspilz
*
C+H/TK Coleoptera (Scarabaeidae) Andermatt Biocontrol AG,
Switzerland
Hajek et al. (2001),M.
Andermatt (personal
communication)
Reunion Island Betel
*
C+H/TK Coleoptera (Scarabaeidae) Betel Reunion S.A., Reunion
Island (subsidiary of Natural
Plant Protection, France)
Hajek et al. (2001), Stetter and
Lieb (2000), A. Bonhomme
(personal communication)
Japan Biolisa-
Kamikiri
*
C+H/TK
(fiber band)
Coleptera (Cerambycidae) Nitto Denko, Japan Hajek et al. (2001, 2006),
Wraight et al. (2001),M.
Shimazu (personal
communication)
Colombia Ago
Biocontrol
Beauveria
50
***
A/NI Coleoptera, Hemiptera,
Lepidoptera, Diptera
Ago Biocontrol, Colombia Shah and Goettel (1999)
Conidiobolus thromboides
South Africa No trade
name
**
C/NI (liquid
suspension)
Hemiptera (Aphididae),
Thysanoptera (Thripidae)
Mycolab, South Africa J. Hatting (personal
communication)
Colombia, Costa
Rica, Honduras
Vektor 25 SL
*
C/NI (liquid
suspension)
Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae,
Ortheziidae)
Laverlam S.A., Colombia Website
9,14
Hirsutella thompsonii
India MeteHit
***
NI Acari Plantrich Chemicals &
Biofertilizers Ltd, India
Santra (2004)
India Mycohit
*
NI/WP
(dusting
during wet
conditions is
possible)
Acari (Eriophyidae) Hindutan Antibiotics Ltd, India Copping (2004), Kumar and
Singh (2001)
USA Mycar
**
C/WP Acari (Eriophyidae) Abbott Laboratories, USA McCoy (1978, 1996)
Isaria fumosorosea (formerly Paecilomyces fumosoroseus)
Europe (many),
Japan
PreFeRal
*
(=Preferred)
B/WG Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae) Biobest n.v., Belgium (under
license from Certis, Inc., USA)
Saito (2005), Wraight et al.
(2001), Website
17
India Priority
*
A/WP Acari
(Eriophyidae,Tetranychidae)
T.Stanes & Company Limited,
India
Copping (2004), Website
2
(continued on next page)
M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256 245
Table 2 (continued)
Country(ies)
where
undergoing
registration,
registered or
marketed
Trade name
a
Propagule(s)/
Formulation
b
Claimed Target(s)
(Orders and Families)
Manufacturer Source(s)
c
Mexico Pae-Sin
*
C/WP Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae) Agrobiologicos del Noroeste
S.A. de C.V. (Agrobionsa),
Mexico
Wraight et al. (2001), A. Paez
(personal communication),
Company brochure
Mexico Pae-Sin
*
C/OD Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae) Agrobiologicos del Noroeste
S.A. de C.V. (Agrobionsa),
Mexico
A. Paez (personal
communication), Company
brochure
Mexico P. fumosoroseus
**
A/NI Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae) Centro de Sanidad Vegetal de
Guanajuato (CESAVEG),
Mexico
Guerra et al. (2001), P. Guerra
(personal communication)
USA,
Mexico
PFR-97 20% WDG
*
B/WG Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae,
Aphididae), Thysanoptera
(Thripidae) + Acari
(Tetranychidae)
Certis, Inc., USA (previous
owner: Thermo Trilogy Corp.,
USA)
Wraight et al. (2001), Website
6
Colombia Ago Biocontrol
Paecilomyces 50
***
A/NI Coleoptera + Nematoda Ago Biocontrol, Colombia Shah and Goettel (1999)
Colombia Fumosil
*
A/NI Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae,
Aphididae, Pseudococcidae),
Thysanoptera (Thripidae)
Productos Biolo
´gicos Perkins
Ltda, Colombia
Website
13
Colombia Successor
*
A/NI Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae,
Aphididae), Thysanoptera
(Thripidae) + Acari
(Tetranychidae)
Live Systems Technology S.A.,
Colombia
Website
12
Venezuela Bemisin
***
C/NI Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae) Probioagro, Venezuela Hajek et al. (2001),
Wraight et al. (2001)
Isaria sp. (formerly Paecilomyces sp.)
India PaciHit Rich
*
NI (liquid
suspension)
Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae),
Thysanoptera (Thripidae) +
Nematoda
Plantrich Chemicals &
Biofertilizers Ltd, India
Website
1
Lagenidium giganteum
USA Laginex AS
*
H/SC Diptera (Culicidae) AgraQuest, Inc., USA Scholte et al. (2004), Website
6
,
R. Riggs (personal communication)
Lecanicillium longisporum (formerly Verticillium lecanii)
Finland,
Switzerland,
UK, Japan
Vertalec
*
B/WP Hemiptera (Aphididae) Koppert Biological Systems,
Netherlands (previously: Tate
and Lyle, UK)
Website
18
, W. Ravensberg
(personal communication)
Brazil Vertirril WP 1300
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae,
Ortheziidae)
Itaforte Industrial de
BioProdutos Agro-Florestais
Ltda., Brazil
A. Ballarotti (personal
communication), R. Lopes
(personal communication)
Lecanicillium muscarium (formerly V. lecanii)
Netherlands,
Denmark,
Finland,
France,
Italy,
Switzerland,
UK,
Turkey,
Japan,
Mycotal
*
C/WP Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae),
Thysanoptera (Thripidae)
Koppert Biological Systems,
Netherlands (previously: Tate
and Lyle, UK)
Website
18
, W. Ravensberg
(personal communication)
Russia Verticillin
*
B/WP Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae,
Aphididae) + Acari
(Tetranychidae)
Biodron, Russia Shternshis (2004), M. Shternshis
(personal communication)
Russia Verticillin
*
B/NI (liquid
suspension)
Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae,
Aphididae) + Acari
(Tetranychidae)
Biodron, Russia Shternshis (2004), M. Shternshis
(personal communication)
Lecanicillium sp.(formerly V. lecanii)
Spain Trichovert
*
A/NI Not informed Trichodex S.A., Spain Website
1
Switzerland MicroGermin Plus
*
H/WP Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae,
Aphididae), Thysanoptera
(Thripidae) + Acari
(Tetranychidae)
Omya (Schweiz) AG,
Switzerland
S. Keller (personal
communication)
246 M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256
Table 2 (continued)
Country(ies)
where
undergoing
registration,
registered or
marketed
Trade name
a
Propagule(s)/
Formulation
b
Claimed Target(s)
(Orders and Families)
Manufacturer Source(s)
c
India Bio-Catch
*
A/WP Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae,
Aphididae,
Pseudococcidae)
T.Stanes & Company Limited,
India
Copping (2004), Website
2
India Biovert
Rich
*
A/NI (powder) ‘‘Insects’’ + Nematoda Plantrich Chemicals &
Biofertilizers Ltd, India
Website
1
India Mealikil
*
A/WP Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha
(‘‘scales’’) + others (not specified)
Agri Life, India Copping (2004), Website
3
Mexico Verti-Sin
*
C/OD Hemiptera (Aphididae),
Thysanoptera (Thripidae)
Agrobiologicos del Noroeste
S.A. de C.V. (Agrobionsa),
Mexico
A. Paez (personal
communication), Company
brochure
Honduras, El
Salvador,
Guatemala,
Jamaica,
Nicaragua
Verzam
*
C/NI Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae,
Aphididae), Thysanoptera
(Thripidae) + Acari
(Tetranychidae)
Escuela Agrı
´cola Panamericana,
Honduras
Website
9
, R. Trabanino
(personal communication)
Brazil No trade
name
*
C/OD Hemiptera (Aphididae) Turfal Ind. Com. Prod. Biol.,
Brazil
M.S. Leite (personal
communication)
Brazil Vertinat
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae,
Ortheziidae)
Natural Rural, Brazil Website
11
Colombia Ago
Biocontrol
Verticillium
50
***
A/NI Hemiptera, Diptera Ago Biocontrol, Colombia Shah and Goettel (1999)
Colombia,
Peru, Costa
Rica, Honduras
Vertisol 50
WP
*
A/WP Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae) Laverlam S.A., Colombia Website
9,14,15
Metarhizium anisopliae
Austria, Italy Granmet-P
*
C+H/TK Coleoptera
(Scarabaeidae, Curculionidae,
Nitidulidae)
Kwizda Agro GmbH, Austria/
Agrifutur s.r.l., Italy
H. Strasser (personal
communication)
Germany,
Switzerland
BIO 1020
**
H/GR (more
specifically, a
Fine Granule-
FG)
Coleoptera
(Curculionidae)
Bayer AG, Germany Hajek et al. (2001), Feng et al.
(1994), D. Roberts (personal
communication)
Spain Trichomet
*
C/NI Not informed Trichodex S.A., Spain Website
1
Switzerland BIO 1020
*
H/GR Coleoptera (Curculionidae) Intrachem Bio SA, Italy S. Keller (personal
communication)
Switzerland Metarhizium
Andermatt
**
C+H/TK Coleoptera (Scarabaeidae) Andermatt Biocontrol AG,
Switzerland
Hajek et al. (2001),
M. Andermatt (personal
communication)
Switzerland Metarhizium
Schweizer
*
C+H/TK Coleoptera (Scarabaeidae) Eric Schweizer Samen AG,
Switzerland
Hajek et al. (2001),
Wraight et al. (2001),
S. Keller (personal
communication)
India Bio-Magic
*
A/WP (also
applied undiluted
into soil for
control of grubs
and weevils)
Coleoptera (Curculionidae,
Scarabaeidae), Hemiptera
(Cercopidae) + others (‘‘plant
hoppers’’)
T.Stanes & Company Limited,
India
Website
2
India Biomet
Rich
*
A/NI (liquid
suspension)
Coleoptera, Isoptera Plantrich Chemicals &
Biofertilizers Ltd, India
Website
1
India Pacer
*
A/WP Isoptera Agri Life, India Copping (2004), Website
3
Australia BioCane
Granules
Biological
Insecticide
*
C+H/TK Coleoptera (Scarabaeidae) Becker Underwood Inc., USA—
Australian division (previously:
Bio-Care Technology Pty Ltd)
Samson et al. (2005), Milner et al.
(2002), Website
19
(continued on next page)
M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256 247
Table 2 (continued)
Country(ies)
where undergoing
registration,
registered or
marketed
Trade name
a
Propagule(s)/
Formulation
b
Claimed Target(s)
(Orders and Families)
Manufacturer Source(s)
c
Australia Chafer Guard
Granules
*
(= Biogreen)
C+H/TK Coleoptera (Scarabaeidae) Becker Underwood Inc., USA—
Australian division (under licence
from Dept. Primary Industry and
Adelaide Research and
Innovation Pty Limited,
Australia)
Website
19
Mexico Fitosan-M
*
A/NI Coleoptera (Scarabaeidae),
Orthoptera
Centro de Sanidad Vegetal de
Guanajuato (CESAVEG),
Mexico
Guerra et al. (2001), P. Guerra
(personal communication)
Mexico Meta-Sin
*
C/WP Coleoptera (Curculionidae,
Scarabaeidae), Hemiptera
(Cercopidae), Orthoptera
Agrobiologicos del Noroeste
S.A. de C.V. (Agrobionsa),
Mexico
Hajek et al. (2001), A. Paez
(personal communication),
Company brochure
Mexico Meta-Sin
*
C/OD Coleoptera (Curculionidae,
Scarabaeidae), Hemiptera
(Cercopidae), Orthoptera
Agrobiologicos del Noroeste
S.A. de C.V. (Agrobionsa),
Mexico
A. Paez (personal
communication), Company
brochure
USA, Mexico Bio-Blast
Biological
Termiticide
*
C/TC Isoptera (Kalotermitidae,
Rhinotermitidae, Termopsidae)
EcoScience Corporation, USA Wraight and Carruthers (1999),
Rath (1995), Website
6
, Company
brochure
USA Bio-Path
Cockroach
Control
Chamber
**
C/RB Blattodea (Blattellidae, Blattidae) EcoScience Corporation, USA Evans (2003), Hajek et al. (2001),
Gunner et al. (1995), J. Lord
(personal communication)
USA Taenure
Granular
Bioinsecticide
*
C/GR Coleoptera (Curculionidae,
Scarabaeidae), Diptera
(Ephydridae, Mycetophilidae,
Sciaridae, Tipulidae),
Thysanoptera (Thripidae)
Novozymes Biologicals Inc.,
USA (previously: Earth
BioSciences; (Taensa Co., USA)
Website
6
, Company brochure
USA Taerain
**
C/OD Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae),
Thysanoptera (Thripidae) +
Acari (Tetranychidae)
Earth BioSciences Inc., USA Company brochure
USA Tick-EX EC
*
C/OD Acari (Ixodidae) + Coleoptera
(Scarabaeidae)
Novozymes Biologicals Inc.,
USA (previously: Earth
BioSciences; Taensa Co., USA)
Website
6
, Company brochure
USA Tick-EX G
*
C/GR Acari + Coleoptera
(Scarabaeidae)
Novozymes Biologicals Inc.,
USA (previously: Earth
BioSciences; Taensa Co., USA)
Website
6
Costa Rica,
Panama
Metadieca
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Liga Agricola Industrial de La
Can
˜a de Azucar (LAICA), Costa
Rica
Website
9
Costa Rica,
Panama
Metadieca
*
C/TC Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Liga Agricola Industrial de La
Can
˜a de Azucar (LAICA), Costa
Rica
Website
9
Costa Rica Technogreen
Metarhizium
35 SL
*
A/NI (liquid
suspension)
Not informed Biolaboratorios de
Centroamerica S.A. (Biolab),
Costa Rica
Website
10
Guatemala Salivase
***
A/NI Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Produtos Ecolo
´gicos, Guatemala Alves et al. (2003)
Honduras, El
Salvador,
Guatemala,
Jamaica,
Nicaragua
Metazam
*
C/WP Hemiptera (Cercopidae),
Lepidoptera (Crambidae) +
Acari (Ixodidae)
Escuela Agrı
´cola Panamericana,
Honduras
R. Trabanino (personal
communication)
Nicaragua Metarhisa
WP
*
C/WP Coleoptera (Curculionidae),
Hemiptera (Cercopidae),
Lepidoptera (Crambidae)
Nicaragua Sugar Estates
Limited, Nicaragua
Website
9
Brazil BioCerto para
Cigarrinhas
*
C/OD Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Biocerto Ind. Com. Prod. Agrop.
Ltda, Brazil
J. Falca
˜o (personal
communication)
Brazil BioCerto PM
*
C/TC Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Biocerto Ind. Com. Prod. Agrop.
Ltda, Brazil
J. Falca
˜o (personal
communication)
248 M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256
Table 2 (continued)
Country(ies) where
undergoing
registration,
registered or
marketed
Trade name
a
Propagule(s)/
Formulation
b
Claimed Target(s)
(Orders and Families)
Manufacturer Source(s)
c
Brazil Biocontrol
**
C/NI Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Agroceres, Brazil Leite et al. (2003b), S. Alves
(personal communication)
Brazil Biomax
**
C/WP Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Labormax Produtos Quı
´micos
Ind. e Com. Ltda., Brazil
R. Pereira (personal
communication)
Brazil, Panama Biotech
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Biotech, Brazil Leite et al. (2003b), E. Marques
(personal communication)
Brazil Conbio
**
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Equilı
´brio Controle Biolo
´gico
Ltda, Brazil
A. Batista Filho (personal
communication)
Brazil Metabiol
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Tecnicontrol Ind. e Com. de
Produtos Biolo
´gicos Ltda., Brazil
Leite et al. (2003b)
Brazil Metanat
*
C/OD Hemiptera (Cercopidae,
Aphididae)
Natural Rural, Brazil Website
11
Brazil Metanat
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae,
Aphididae)
Natural Rural, Brazil Website
11
Brazil Metaquino
**
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Com. Exec. Def. Fit. Lav. Can.
PE (CODECAP), Brazil
Aquino et al. (1975)
Brazil Metarril WP
E9
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Itaforte Industrial de
BioProdutos Agro-Florestais
Ltda., Brazil
R. Lopes (personal
communication)
Brazil Metarril SC
1037
*
C/OD Hemiptera (Cercopidae) + Acari
(Ixodidae)
Itaforte Industrial de
BioProdutos Agro-Florestais
Ltda., Brazil
R. Lopes (personal
communication)
Brazil Metarriz
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Biocontrol Sistemas de Controle
Biolo
´gico, Brazil
J. Almeida (personal
communication)
Brazil Methamax
*
C/OD Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Turfal Ind. Com. Prod. Biol.,
Brazil
M.S. Leite (personal
communication)
Brazil Methavida
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Methavida Controle Biolo
´gico
Agrı
´cola, Brazil
J. Almeida (personal
communication)
Brazil No trade
name
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Bioagro Controle Biolo
´gico,
Brazil
E. Marques (personal
communication)
Brazil No trade
name
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Biocana Braz e Costa Ind. e
Com. de Produtos Biolo
´gicos,
Brazil
J. Almeida (personal
communication)
Brazil No trade
name
**
C/NI Hemiptera (Cercopidae) BTA, Brazil Leite et al. (2003b)
Brazil No trade
name
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Empresa Mato-Grossense de
Pesquisa, Assiste
ˆncia e Extensa
˜o
Rural S/A (EMPAER), Brazil
M. Santaella (personal
communication)
Brazil No trade
name
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Empresa Pernambucana de
Pesquisa Agropecua
´ria (IPA),
Brazil
E. Marques (personal
communication)
Brazil No trade
name
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Empresa de Pesquisa
Agropecua
´ria do Estado do Rio
de Janeiro (PESAGRO), Brazil
S. Alves (personal
communication)
Brazil No trade
name
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Fitossan Assiste
ˆncia
Fitossanita
´ria e Controle
Biolo
´gico Ltda., Brazil
J. Santos (personal
communication)
Brazil No trade
name
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Fundac¸a
˜o Agro-ambiental da
Amazo
ˆnia (FUNAM), Brazil
V. Rocha (personal
communication)
Brazil No trade
name
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Instituto Biolo
´gico, Brazil J. Almeida (personal
communication)
Brazil No trade
name
**
C+H/TK Hymenoptera (Formicidae),
Siphonaptera (Pulicidae)
Instituto de Biotecnologia
Rangel Ltda. (Inbioter), Brazil
D. Rangel (personal
communication)
Brazil No trade
name
*
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Toyobo do Brasil Ltda., Brazil J. Almeida (personal
communication)
Colombia Ago
Biocontrol
Metarhizium
50
***
A/NI Coleoptera, Hemiptera,
Lepidoptera, Orthoptera
Ago Biocontrol, Colombia Shah and Goettel (1999)
(continued on next page)
M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256 249
Table 2 (continued)
Country(ies)
where
undergoing
registration,
registered or
marketed
Trade
name
a
Propagule(s)/
Formulation
b
Claimed Target(s)
(Orders and Families)
Manufacturer Source(s)
c
Colombia DeepGreen
*
A/NI Coleoptera
(Scarabaeidae),
Hemiptera
(Miridae, Cicadellidae)
Live Systems Technology S.A.,
Colombia
Website
12
Colombia,
Costa Rica,
Honduras,
Nicaragua
Destruxin
*
(=Dextruxin
50 WP)
A/WP Coleoptera (Curculionidae,
Scarabaeidae), Hemiptera
(Miridae, Cercopidae,
Delphacidae), Lepidoptera
(Noctuidae)
Laverlam S.A., Colombia Website
9,14
Colombia Metaril
*
C/NI Coleoptera (Curculiionidae,
Scarabaeidae), Hemiptera
(Miridae, Pentatomidae,
Cercopidae, Delphacidae),
Lepidoptera (Noctuidae)
Productos Biolo
´gicos Perkins
Ltda, Colombia
Website
13
Venezuela Cobican
***
C/NI Coleoptera (Scarabaeidae),
Hemiptera (Cercopidae,
Aphididae)
Probioagro S.A., Venezuela Alves et al. (2003),
Wraight et al. (2001)
Venezuela Metabiol
***
A/NI Hemiptera (Cercopidae) Empresa Prave Agrobiote
´nica
S.A., Venezuela
Website
20
Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum
Mozambique,
Namibia,
Tanzania,
South Africa,
Sudan,
Zambia
Green
Muscle OF
*
C/OF Orthoptera (Acrididae,
Pyrgomorphidae)
Biological Control Products SA
(Pty) Ltd, South Africa (under
license from CABI, UK)
Pettit and Jenkins (2005),
Bateman (1997), Website
2
Australia Green
Guard
ULV
*
C/OF Orthoptera (Acrididae) Becker Underwood Inc., USA—
Australian division (under licence
from CSIRO, Australia)
Milner and Hunter (2001),
Website
19
, P. Melville (personal
communication)
Australia Green
Guard SC
*
C/TC (dry spores,
surfactant solution
and emulsifiable oil
are sold together,
but not mixed)
Orthoptera (Acrididae) Becker Underwood Inc., USA—
Australian division (under licence
from CSIRO, Australia)
Website
19
Nomuraea rileyi
Colombia Ago
Biocontrol
Nomuraea
50
***
A/NI Lepidoptera Ago Biocontrol, Colombia Shah and Goettel (1999)
‘‘Sporothrix insectorum’’
Brazil No trade
name
**
C+H/TK Hemiptera (Tingidae) Estac¸a
˜o de Aviso Fitossanita
´rio
de Sa
˜o Jose
´do Rio Claro, Brazil
M.A. Leite (personal
communication)
Brazil No trade
name
*
S+B+H/TK
(liquid substrate)
Hemiptera (Tingidae) Instituto Biolo
´gico, Brazil Leite et al. (2003a),
J. Almeida (personal
communication)
Brazil Sporothrix
ES
*
C/OD Hemiptera (Tingidae) Biocerto Ind. Com. Prod. Agrop.
Ltda, Brazil
J. Falca
˜o (personal
communication)
Mix: B. bassiana,M. anisopliae,I. fumosorosea
Mexico Tri-Sin
*
C/WP Hemiptera (Psyllidae) Agrobiologicos del Noroeste
S.A. de C.V. (Agrobionsa),
Mexico
A. Paez (personal
communication), Company
brochure
Mexico Tri-Sin
*
C/OD Hemiptera (Psyllidae) Agrobiologicos del Noroeste
S.A. de C.V. (Agrobionsa),
Mexico
A. Paez (personal
communication), Company
brochure
Mix: B. bassiana,M. anisopliae +Paecilomyces lilacinus
Colombia Fungio WP
*
NI NI Orius Biotecnologı
´a, Colombia Website
21
250 M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256
1979). Although most products are based on specific types
of propagules (Section 2.1), the end product may contain
small or even substantial amounts of other propagule
types. Products based on aerial conidia may contain
hyphae, and vice-versa, and mycoinsecticides produced
through liquid fermentation may present a mix of
submerged conidia, blastospores and hyphae (Leite et al.,
2003a). The exact propagule composition of biopesticide
products is rarely stated by manufacturers, and, in some
cases, the specific propagule comprising the active ingredi-
ent is not indicated. For many of these products, the active
ingredient is quantified in terms of colony forming units.
Thus, in this listing we report only what we were able to
identify from product claims and descriptions as the pre-
dominant propagule type. For six products, no identifica-
tion of propagule type was possible. Based on the
available information, we determined that a significant
proportion of products (25.7%, most of these classified as
technical concentrates) contain both asexual spores and
hyphae. However, 67.5% of all products are described as
Table 2 (continued)
Country(ies)
where
undergoing
registration,
registered or
marketed
Trade name
a
Propagule(s)/
Formulation
b
Claimed Target(s)
(Orders and Families)
Manufacturer Source(s)
c
Colombia,
Ecuador, Chile,
Peru, Panama
Micosplag
*
C/WP Coleoptera (Chrysomelidae,
Curculionidae, Scarabaeidae),
Hemiptera (Lygaeidae, Miridae,
Pentatomidae, Tingidae,
Cercopidae, Delphacidae),
Lepidoptera (Noctuidae,
Nymphalidae, Crambidae) +
Nematoda
Orius Biotecnologı
´a, Colombia Website
15,21
, M. Higuera
(personal communication)
Mix: B. bassiana,M. anisopliae,N. rileyi,I. fumosorosea +Bacillus thuringiensis
Colombia Micobiol
Completo
***
A/NI Coleoptera, Hemiptera,
Lepidoptera, Diptera + Acari
NI Alves et al. (2003)
Mix: B. bassiana,H. thompsonii,Lecanicillium sp.,M. anisopliae,N. rileyi,I. fumosorosea +P.lilacinus
Colombia Micobiol
HE
***
A/NI Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera,
Lepidoptera + Acari +
Nematoda
NI Alves et al. (2003)
Mix (?): Lecanicillium spp. (formerly V. lecanii)
Scandinavia MicroGermin
**
A/WP Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae,
Aphididae)
Christian Hansen BioSystems,
Denmark
Butt et al. (1999), Helyer et al.
(1992), W. Ravensberg (personal
communication)
a
Availability of product is informed as follows:
*
active,
**
inactive, and
***
current status could not be determined (see Table 1 for additional
information).
b
Categories adopted for propagule types of developed products: H, hyphae (mycelia); A, asexual spores (type not informed); C, aerial conidia; S,
submerged conidia; B, blastospores (= hyphal bodies); NI, not informed by consulted sources.
c
Websites consulted:
1
AMC Chemical and Trichodex (http://www.amcchemical.com/).
2
Biological Control Products SA (Pty) Ltd (http://www.biocontrol.co.za).
3
Plantrich Chemicals & Biofertilizers Ltd. (http://www.indiamart.com/biofertilizers/).
4
T.Stanes & Company Limited (http://www.tstanes.com).
5
Agri Life (http://www.somphyto.com).
6
EPA—Environmental Protection Agency (http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/ingredients/).
7
Laverlam International Corporation (http://www.laverlamintl.com/).
8
Troy Biosciences, Inc. (http://www.troybiosciences.com/).
9
Bioplaguicidas.Org (http://www.bioplaguicidas.org/) (in Spanish).
10
Servicio Fitosanitario del Estado—Costa Rica, Potecnet (http://www.protecnet.go.cr/InsumoSys/Principal.htm) (in Spanish).
11
Natural Rural (http://www.naturalrural.com.br/) (in Portuguese).
12
Live Systems Technology S.A. (http://lstsa.com/).
13
Productos Biolo
´gicos Perkins Ltda (http://www.perkinsltda.com.co/) (in Spanish).
14
Laverlam S.A. (www.laverlam.com.co/espanol/portada.htm) (in Spanish).
15
Servicio Nacional de Sanidade Agraria (http://www.senasa.gob.pe) (in Spanish).
16
Rede de Informacio
´n y Comunicacio
´n Estrate
´gica del Sector Agropecuario—AGRONET (http://www.agronet.gov.cl) (in Spanish).
17
Biobest n.v. (http://www.biobest.be/).
18
Koppert Biological Systems (www.koppert.nl/).
19
Becker Underwood Pty Ltd (http://www.beckerunderwood.com/australia/).
20
http://www.plagas-agricolas.info.ve/ (in Spanish).
21
Orius Biotecnologı
´a(http://www.Oriusbiotecnologia.com/site/) (in Spanish).
M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256 251
being based exclusively on asexual spores, with aerial con-
idia being the most common among all products (41.2%).
Only 4.1% of listed products are claimed to contain only
blastospores, whereas this kind of propagule is also present
in two other products, one including submerged conidia
and one including submerged conidia and hyphae. No
products have been reported as containing only submerged
conidia, and those based exclusively on hyphae account for
only 2.3% of all products. The type of asexual spore could
not be determined for 22.2% of products.
Formulation types could not be determined for 25.7% of
all listed products, and despite conflicting data and lack of
standardization among different sources, two technical
products (TC and TK) and nine different formulation types
were identified. The most common types were technical
concentrates in the form of fungus-colonized substrates
(26.3%), wettable powders (20.5%), and oil dispersions
(15.2%). The remaining types include granules (2.9%),
technical materials (2.9%), baits (1.8%), water dispersible
granules (1.8%), oil miscible flowable concentrates (1.2%),
ULV suspensions (0.6%), suspension concentrates (0.6%),
and contact powders (0.6%).
As indicated previously, assigning a formulation type to
a product is not a straightforward step. Formulation defi-
nitions developed for chemical pesticides often are not pre-
cisely applicable to biopesticides. Revisions in the
international code to accommodate current microbial for-
mulation designations are needed. Also, there is a great
deal of overlap among formulation definitions, and a single
product may fall into more than one category. There is,
therefore, a certain amount of subjectivity associated with
selection of the proper code, and there are many circum-
stances in which designations adopted in this paper do
not match those used in previous publications or by
manufacturers.
Among listed products, at least 160 (93.6%) are claimed
to have activity against insects, and 28 (16.4%) against aca-
rines. Nematodes (2.9%), crustaceans (1.2%), and centi-
pedes (1.2%) also are among the claimed target hosts,
while targets for 4.7% of products could not be determined.
The sum of the above percentages is substantially greater
than 100% due to the fact that most products are indicated
as controlling pests in more than one order and usually
multiple species within an order (data not shown). Targets
are distributed among 10 insect orders: Hemiptera (59.6%),
Coleoptera (40.9%), Lepidoptera (17.5%), Thysanoptera
(14.6%), Orthoptera (9.4%), Diptera (7.0%), Hymenoptera
(2.9%), Isoptera (2.3%), Siphonaptera (1.2%), and Blatto-
dea (0.6%). The listed products are claimed to control tar-
gets in at least 48 insect families, with insects in the families
Aleyrodidae, Curculionidae (including Scolytinae), Cer-
copidae, Scarabaeidae, Aphididae, and Thripidae being
among the most common targets (Table 3). Among myco-
acaricides, only three products, all based on H. thompsonii,
were developed specifically for control of acarines. Target
acarines are from at least four families, but predominantly
focused on Tetranychidae.
Out of 129 products currently in the ‘‘active’’ category
(registered, undergoing registration or available), over
90% were developed for inundation microbial control,
while less than 10% were developed exclusively for inocula-
tion control strategies (as defined by Eilenberg et al., 2001).
The latter strategy is based on mycoinsecticides with high
mycelial concentration, for example formulated products
based solely on hyphae, or fungus-colonized substrates
for control of soil-inhabiting beetles.
Historically, countries in Asia, Latin America, and East-
ern Europe have accounted for the greatest use of fungal
pathogens. As reviewed by Feng et al. (1994), in the
1980s approximately 0.8–1.3 million hectares of forests in
China were treated annually with B. bassiana for control
of numerous pests; however, this use was largely govern-
ment supported (noncommercial) and has declined mark-
edly in recent years (Feng, 2003). Commercial production
of mycopesticides is only beginning in China; launches by
private companies of formulated products for management
of grasshoppers and tea leafhoppers is anticipated (M.-G.
Feng, Zhejiang University, China, personal communica-
tion). There also have been high levels of noncommercial
production of mycoinsecticides by grower cooperatives in
Brazil during the 1970s and 1980s (Alves, 1998), by govern-
ment laboratories in several Eastern European countries
(especially Russia, Poland and Czechoslovakia) during
the same time period (Lipa, 1985; Feng et al., 1994), and
by government laboratories in Cuba since the 1990s (Ros-
set, 1997; Vega, 2005).
Products developed by South American companies and
institutions represent 42.7% of all listed (commercial) prod-
ucts, followed by North America (20.5%), Europe and Asia
(12.3% each), Central America (7.0%), Africa (2.9%), and
Oceania (2.3%). The data suggest that the largest current
program using entomopathogenic fungi is based on M. ani-
sopliae application for control of spittlebugs in sugarcane
fields and pastures of South and Central America. Among
the 58 listed products based on M. anisopliae, 37 (63.8%)
are claimed to be active against cercopids, and over 90%
of these are currently available in South and Central Amer-
ica. In Brazil, M. anisopliae is used to control a complex
of spittlebugs, including Mahanarva fimbriolata (Sta
˚l)
and Mahanarva posticata (Sta
˚l) in sugarcane fields, and
M. fimbriolata,Deois flavopicta (Sta
˚l) and Notozulia entre-
riana (Berg) in pastures (Alves, 1998; Faria and Magalha
˜es,
2001). In a single sugarcane operation, this fungus is annu-
ally applied on over 60,000 hectares for control of M. fimb-
riolata (J.E.M. de Almeida, Instituto Biolo
´gico, Brazil,
personal communication). Other impressive numbers relate
to the worldwide use of M. anisopliae for scarab control,
and B. bassiana for control of weevils, whiteflies, scarabs,
thrips, and aphids, each with at least 10 products currently
in the ‘‘active’’ category.
In the literature there is a great deal of incomplete,
inconsistent and even conflicting information regarding
developed mycopesticides. Other difficulties in assembling
an accurate list of products are related to incomplete infor-
252 M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256
Table 3
Number of mycopesticides and mycoacaricides per target orders and families
Orders and families Fungal agents
a
Aa Bb Bbr Ct Ht If Isp Lg Ll Lm Lsp Ma Mac Nr Si Mix Total %
b
Blattodea 1 1 0.6
Blattellidae 1 1 0.6
Blattidae 1 1 0.6
Coleoptera 37 7 1 22 3 70 40.9
Cerambycidae 2 1 3 1.8
Chrysomelidae 10 1 11 6.4
Curculionidae 31 10 1 42 24.6
Scarabaeidae 15 5 16 1 37 21.6
Nitidulidae 1 1 0.6
Family—Not informed 1 1 2 2 6 3.5
Diptera 6 1 1 1 1 2 12 7.0
Culicidae 1 1 0.6
Ephydridae 1 1 2 1.2
Muscidae 3 3 1.8
Mycetophilidae 1 1 2 1.2
Sciaridae 1 1 2 1.2
Tipulidae 2 1 3 1.8
Family—Not informed 1 1 1 2 5 2.9
Hemiptera 1 25 1 2 8 1 2 3 10 40 3 6 102 59.6
Heteroptera: Lygaeidae 2 1 3 1.8
Heteroptera: Miridae 8 3 1 12 7.0
Heteroptera: Pentatomidae 1 1 2 1.2
Heteroptera: Reduviidae 1 1 0.6
Heteroptera: Tingidae 3 1 4 2.3
Auchenorrhyncha: Cercopidae 2 37 1 40 23.4
Auchenorrhyncha:: Cicadellidae 9 1 10 5.8
Auchenorrhyncha: Delphacidae 1 2 1 4 2.3
Auchenorrhyncha: Fulgoridae 5 5 2.9
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae 1 20 1 8 1 1 3 5 1 1 42 24.6
Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae 12 1 3 1 2 5 3 1 28 16.4
Sternorrhyncha: Ortheziidae 1 1 1 3 1.8
Sternorrhyncha: Pseudococcidae 8 1 1 10 5.8
Sternorrhyncha: Psyllidae 9 2 11 6.4
Family—Not informed 2 1 2 1 2 8 4.7
Hymenoptera 4 1 5 2.9
Formicidae 4 1 5 2.9
Isoptera 1 3 4 2.3
Kalotermitidae 1 1 0.6
Rhinotermitidae 1 1 2 1.2
Termitidae 1 1 0.6
Termopsidae 1 1 0.6
Family—Not informed 2 2 1.2
Lepidoptera 20 1 5 1 3 30 17.5
Castniidae 2 2 1.2
Crambidae 9 2 1 12 7.0
Gelechiidae 1 1 0.6
Geometridae 2 2 1.2
Noctuidae 7 2 1 10 5.8
Nymphalidae 1 1 2 1.2
Pieridae 2 2 1.2
Plutellidae 3 3 1.8
Sphingidae 1 1 0.6
Tortricidae 2 2 1.2
Family—Not informed 4 1 1 1 2 9 5.3
Orthoptera 9 4 3 16 9.4
Acrididae 8 3 11 6.4
Gryllotalpidae 2 2 1.2
Pyrgomorphidae 1 1 0.6
(continued on next page)
M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256 253
mation presented on product labels or in product descrip-
tions (when available), lack of up-to-date information
(especially following corporate mergers), information in
only one language, etc. Despite its imperfections, the list
of products presented in this work represents a database
that could be updated periodically, providing the scientific
community with a valuable source of state-of-the-art infor-
mation on fungus-based insecticides and acaricides.
Acknowledgments
We are thankful to the following people for partial
information on one or more products: Antoine Bonhomme
(Natural Plant Protection, France), Martin Andermatt
(Andermatt Biocontrol AG, Switzerland), Willem Ravens-
berg (Koppert Biological Systems, Netherlands), Hermann
Strasser (University of Innsbruck, Austria), Marilena A. de
Muro (CABI, UK), Roy Bateman (IPARC,UK), Siegfried
Keller (Federal Research Station Agroscope Reckenholz-
Ta
¨nikon ART, Switzerland), Zdene
ˇk Ada
´mek (Academy
of Sciences, Czech Republic), Justin Hatting (ARC-Small
Grain Institute, South Africa), Margarita Shternshis
(Novosibirsk State Agrarian University, Russia), Mitsuaki
Shimazu (Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute,
Japan), Ming-Guang Feng (Zhejiang University, China),
Kevin Moran (Troy Biosciences Inc., USA), Peter Melville
(Becker Underwood Inc., USA), Ralph Riggs (AgraQuest
Inc., USA), Theresa Bruette (Certis, USA), Brian Steinw-
and (EPA, USA), Donald Roberts (Utah State University,
USA), Drauzio Rangel (Utah State University, USA),
Louela Castrillo (USDA Plant, Soil, & Nutrition Labora-
tory, USA), Richard Humber (USDA Plant, Soil, & Nutri-
tion Laboratory, USA), Roberto Pereira (USDA-ARS,
CMAVE, USA), Stefan Jaronski (USDA-ARS, NPARL,
USA), Ana Paez (Sinaloa, Mexico), Patricia Guerra
(Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Mexico), Rogelio
Trabanino (Escuela Agrı
´cola Panamericana, Honduras),
Walter Solano (Protecnet, Costa Rica), Mario Delgado
Higuera (Orius Biotecnologı
´a, Colombia), Roberto Lecu-
ona (INTA Castelar, Argentina), Ariclenis Ballarotti (Ita-
forte Ind. BioProdutos Agro-Florestais Ltda., Brazil),
Jales Falca
˜o (BioCerto Ind. Com. Prod. Agropec. Ltda.,
Brazil), Jose
´de S. Santos (Fitossan Assiste
ˆncia Fitossanita
´-
ria e Controle Biolo
´gico Ltda., Brazil), Marcı
´lio B. Santa-
ella (EMPAER, Brazil), Marco A. Leite (Estac¸a
˜o de Aviso
Fitossanita
´rio, Brazil), and Maria S. Leite (Turfal Ind.
Com. Prod. Biol., Brazil). We are also thankful to the fol-
lowing people from Rede Entomofungo (Brazilian network
for entomopathogenic fungi): Anto
ˆnio Batista Filho (Insti-
tuto Biolo
´gico), Edmilson Marques (Univ. Federal Rural
de Pernambuco), Jose
´Almeida (Instituto Biolo
´gico), Luis
Alves (Unioeste), Luis Leite (Instituto Biolo
´gico), Roberto
Alves (EMBRAPA), Roge
´rio Lopes (Itaforte Ind. Bio-
Produtos Agro-Florestais Ltda.), and Se
´rgio Alves
(ESALQ). We extend our special thanks to Kathie Hodge
(Cornell University, Ithaca, USA) for information on fun-
gal classification and Thomas Woods (Specifications Ex-
pert Group–CropLife International) for exciting
discussions regarding some formulation types. Finally, we
are grateful to Ann Hajek (Cornell University, Ithaca,
USA) for reviewing the manuscript.
References
Alves, S.B., 1998. Fungos entomopatoge
ˆnicos. In: Alves, S.B. (Ed.),
Controle Microbiano de Insetos. FEALQ, Piracicaba, pp. 289–
381.
Alves, S.B., Pereira, R.M., Lopes, R.B., Tamai, M.A., 2003. Use of
entomopathogenic fungi in Latin America. In: Upadhyay, R.K. (Ed.),
Advances in Microbial Control of Insect Pests. Kluwer Academic,
New York, NY, pp. 193–211.
Table 3 (continued)
Orders and families Fungal agents
a
Aa Bb Bbr Ct Ht If Isp Lg Ll Lm Lsp Ma Mac Nr Si Mix Total %
b
Tettigoniidae 6 6 3.5
Family—Not informed 1 4 5 2.9
Siphonaptera 1 1 2 1.2
Pulicidae 1 1 2 1.2
Thysanoptera 14 1 3 1 1 3 2 1 25 14.6
Thripidae 14 1 3 1 1 3 2 25 14.6
Acari 11 3 3 2 2 5 2 28 16.4
Eriophyidae 1 2 1 4 2.3
Ixodidae 3 3 1.8
Tarsonemidae 1 1 0.6
Tetranychidae 9 3 2 2 1 17 9.9
Family—Not informed 1 1 2 4 2.3
Order(s) not informed 3 2 2 1 8 4.7
a
Aa, Aschersonia aleyrodis; Bb, Beauveria bassiana; Bbr, B. brongniartii; Ct, Conidiobolus thromboides; Ht, Hirsutella thompsonii; If, Isaria fumosorosea;
Isp, Isaria sp.; Lg, Lagenidium giganteum; Ll, Lecanicillium longisporum; Lm, L. muscarium; Lsp, Lecanicillium sp.; Ma, Metarhizium anisopliae; Mac, M.
anisopliae var. acridum; Nr, Nomuraea rileyi; Si, Sporothrix insectorum; Mix, mixture of two or more species.
b
Percentages calculated by dividing the number of products per order/family by the total number of products (171).
254 M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256
Aquino, M. de L.N. de, Cavalcanti, V.A.L.B., Sena, R.C. de, Queiroz,
G.F. de, 1975. Nova tecnologia de multiplicac¸a
˜o do fungo Metarrhiz-
ium anisopliae. Boletim Te
´cnico da CODECAP n°4. CODECAP,
Recife.
Bateman, R.P., 1997. The development of a mycoinsecticide for the
control of locusts and grasshoppers. Outlook on Agriculture 26, 13–18.
Burges, H.D., Jones, K.A., 1998. Introduction. In: Burges, H.D. (Ed.), .
Formulation of Microbial Pesticides—Beneficial Microorganisms,
Nematodes and Seed Treatments. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The
Netherlands, pp. 2–30.
Butt, T.M., Copping, L.G., 2000. Fungal biological control agents.
Pesticide Outlook (October), 186–191.
Butt, T.M., Harris, J.G., Powell, K.A., 1999. Microbial biopesticides: the
European scene. In: Hall, F.R., Menn, J.J. (Eds.), Biopesticides: Use
and Delivery. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp. 23–44.
Castrillo, L.A., Roberts, D.W., Vandenberg, J.D., 2005. The fungal past,
present, and future: germination, ramification, and reproduction.
Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 89, 46–56.
Copping, L.G., 2004. The Manual of Biocontrol Agents, third ed. British
Crop Protection Council, Aston, UK.
Copping, L.G., Menn, J.J., 2000. Biopesticides: a review of their action,
applications and efficacy. Pest Management Science 56, 651–676.
CropLife International, 2002. Catalogue of pesticide formulation types
and international coding system. Technical Monograph n°2, 5th eds.
Available online at http://www.croplife.org/monographs.aspx.
Edlind, T.D., Jing, L., Visvesvara, G.S., Vodkin, M.H., McLaughlin,
G.L., Katiya, S.K., 1996. Phylogenetic analysis of b-tubulin sequences
from amitochondrial Protozoa. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolu-
tion 5, 359–367.
Eilenberg, J., Hajek, A., Lomer, C., 2001. Suggestions for unifying the
terminology in biological control. BioControl 46, 387–400.
Evans, H.C., 2003. Use of Clavicipitalean fungi for the biocontrol of
arthropod pests. In: White, J.F., Jr., Bacon, C.W., Hywel-Jones, N.L.,
Spatafora, J.W. (Eds.), Clavicipitale an Fungi: Evolutionary Biology,
Chemistry, Biocontrol, and Cultural Impacts. Marcel Dekker, New
York, NY, pp. 517–548.
FAO/WHO, 2002. Manual on development of FAO and WHO specifi-
cations for pesticides, 1st ed., FAO Plant Production and Protection
Papers, FAO/WHO, Rome, p. 173.
Faria, M.R.de, Magalha
˜es, B.P., 2001. O uso de fungos entomopatoge
ˆn-
icos no Brasil. Biotecnologia Cie
ˆncia & Desenvolvimento 22, 18–21.
Feng, M.-G., 2003. Microbial control of insect pests with entomopath-
ogenic fungi in China: a decade’s progress in research and utilization.
In: Upadhyay, R.K. (Ed.), Advances in Microbial Control of Insect
Pests. Kluwer Academic, New York, NY, pp. 213–234.
Feng, M.-G., Poprawski, T.J., Khachatourians, G.C., 1994. Production,
formulation and application of the entomopathogenic fungus Bauveria
bassiana for insect control: current status. Biocontrol Science and
Technology 4, 3–34.
Ferron, P., 1981. Pest control by the fungi Beauveria and Metarhizium. In:
Burges, H.D. (Ed.), Microbial Control of Pests and Plant Diseases
1970-1980. Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 465–482.
Gams, W., Zare, R., 2001. A revision of Verticillium sect. Prostrata. Part
III: Generic classification. Nova Hedwigia 72, 329–337.
Guerra, P.T., Wong, L.J.G., Roda
´n, H.M., Gutie
´rrez, C.G., Padilla,
C.R., Flores, R.A.G., Guerra, R.S.T., 2001. Bioinsecticidas: su
empleo, produccio
´n y comercializacio
´nenMe
´xico. Ciencia UANL
4, 143–152.
Gunner, H.B., Agudelo-Silva, F., Miller, D.W., 1995. Device containing
fungus for the biological control of insects. USPTO Patent 5,427,784.
Hajek, A.E., Wraight, S.P., Vandenberg, J.D., 2001. Control of arthro-
pods using pathogenic fungi. In: Pointing, S.B., Hyde, K.D. (Eds.),
Bio-Exploitation of Filamentous Fungi, Fungal Diversity Research
Series 6. Fungal Diversity Press, Hong Kong, pp. 309–347.
Hajek, A.E., Delalibera Jr., I., Butler, L., 2003. Entomopathogenic fungi
as classical biological control agents. In: Hokkanen, H.M.T., Hajek,
A.E. (Eds.), Environmental Impacts of Microbial Insecticides. Kluwer
Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 15–34.
Hajek, A.E., Huang, B., Dubois, T., Smith, M.T., Li, Z., 2006. Field
studies of control of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Ceram-
bycidae) using fiber bands containing the entomopathogenic fungi
Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria brongniartii. Biocontrol Science
and Technology 16, 329–343.
Helyer, N., Gill, G., Bywater, A., 1992. Control of Chrysanthemum pests
with Verticillium lecanii. Phytoparasitica 20 (Suppl.), 5S–9S.
Henke, M.O., de Hoog, G.S., Gross, U., Zimmermann, G., Draemer, D.,
Wig, M., 2002. Human deep tissue infection with an entomopatho-
genic Beauveria species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 40, 2698–
2702.
Hluchy
´, M., Sams
ˇin
ˇa
´kova
´, A., 1989. Comparative study on the suscep-
tibility of adult Sitophilus granarius (L) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
and larval Galleria mellonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) to the
entomogenous fungus Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. Journal of
Stored Products Research 25, 61–64.
Hodge, K.T., Gams, W., Samson, R.A., Korf, R.P., Seifert, K.A., 2005.
Lectotypification and status of Isaria Pers. Fr. Taxon 54, 485–489.
Hynes, R.K., Boyetchko, S.M., 2006. Research initiatives in the art and
science of biopesticide formulations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38,
845–849.
Inglis, G.D., Goettel, M.S., Butt, T.M., Strasser, H., 2001. Use of
hyphomycetous fungi for managing insect pests. In: Butt, T.M.,
Jackson, C., Magan, N. (Eds.), Fungi as Biocontrol Agents: Progress,
Problems and Potential. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 23–
69.
Ignoffo, C.M., Anderson, R.F., 1979. Bioinsecticides, second ed. In:
Peppler, H.J., Perlman, D. (Eds.), Microbial Technology, 1. Academic
Press, New York, NY, pp. 1–28.
Kabaluk, T., Gazdik, K., 2005. Directory of Microbial Pesticides for
Agricultural Crops in OECD Countries. Agriculture and Agri-Food
Canada. Available online at http://www.agr.gc.ca/env/pest/index_-
e.php??s1=pub& page=micro.
Kaufman, P.E., Reasor, C., Rutz, D.A., Ketzis, J.K., Arends, J.J., 2005.
Evaluation of Beauveria bassiana applications against adult house fly,
Musca domestica, in commercial caged-layer poultry facilities in New
York state. Biological Control 33, 360–367.
Keeling, P.J., 2003. Congruent evidence from a-tubulin and b-tubulin gene
phylogenies for a zygomycete origin of Microsporidia. Fungal Genet-
ics and Biology 38, 298–309.
Kendrick, M., 2000. The Fifth Kingdom, 3rd ed. Mycologue Publications,
Sidney, Australia.
Kirk, P.M., Cannon, P.F., David, J.C., Stalpers, J.A., 2001. Ainsworth
and Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi, 9th ed. CAB International,
Wallingford, UK.
Kreutz, J., Vaupel, O., Zimmermann, G., 2004. Efficacy of Beauveria
bassiana (Bals) Vuill. against the spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus
L., in the laboratory under various conditions. Journal of Applied
Entomology 128, 384–389.
Kumar, P.S., Singh, S.P., 2001. Coconut mite in India: biopesticide
breakthrough. Biocontrol News and Information 22, 76N–78N.
Leite, L.G., Batista Filho, A., Almeida, J.E.M. de, Alves, S.B., 2003a.
Produc¸a
˜o de Fungos Entomopatoge
ˆnicos. A.S. Pinto, Ribeira
˜o Preto.
Leite, L.G., Alves, S.B., Pereira, R.M., 2003b. Insecticidas Microbianos.
In: Aguayo, G.S., Gallo, R.H. (Eds.), Bases para el Manejo Racional
de Insecticidas. Universidad de Conception/Fundacio
´n para la Inno-
vacio
´n Agraria (FIA), Chilla
´n, pp. 115–155.
Lipa, J.J., 1985. Progress in biological control of the Colorado beetle
(Leptinotarsa decemlineata) in Eastern Europe. Bulletin OEPP 15, 207–
211.
Lord, J.C., 2005. From Metchnikoff to Monsanto and beyond: the path of
microbial control. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 89, 19–29.
Luangsa-Ard, J.J., Hywel-Jones, N.L., Manoch, L., Samson, R.A., 2005.
On the relationships of Paecilomyces sect. Isarioidea species. Myco-
logical Research 109, 581–589.
McCoy, C.W., 1978. Entomopathogens in arthropod pest control
programs for citrus. In: Allen, G.E., Ignoffo, C.M., Jaques, R.P.
(Eds.), Microbial Control of Insect Pests: Future Strategies in Pest
M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256 255
Management Systems. NFS/USDA/University of Florida, Gainesville,
FL, pp. 211–219.
McCoy, C.W., 1986. Factors governing the efficacy of Hirsutella thom-
psonii in the field. In: Samson, R.A., Vlak, J.M., Peters, D. (Eds.),
Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Invertebrate Pathology. Foun-
dation of the Fourth International Colloquium of Invertebrate
Pathology. Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 171–174.
McCoy, C.W., 1996. Pathogens of eriophyoid mites. In: Lindquist, E.E.,
Sabelis, M.W., Bruin, J. (Eds.), Eriophyoid Mites—Their Biology, .
Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
pp. 481–490.
Milner, J.R., Hunter, D.M., 2001. Recent developments in the use of fungi
as biopesticides against locusts and grasshoppers in Australia. Journal
of Orthoptera Research 10, 271–276.
Milner, R.J., Samson, P.R., Bullard, G.K., 2002. FI-1045: a profile of a
commercially useful isolate of Metarhizium anisopliae var anisopliae.
Biocontrol Science and Technology 12, 43–58.
Neale, M., 2000. The regulation of natural products as crop-protection
agents. Pest Management Science 56, 677–680.
Pell, J.K., Eilenberg, J., Hajek, A.E., Steinkraus, D.C., 2001. Biology,
ecology and pest management potential of Entomophthorales. In: Butt,
T.M., Jackson, C., Magan, N. (Eds.), Fungi as Biocontrol Agents:
Progress, Problems and Potential. CAB International, Wallingford,
UK, pp. 71–154.
Pettit, B., Jenkins, N., 2005. Locust upsurge allows environmentally safe
control to be tested. Pesticide News 67, 13–14.
Rath, A., 1995. Termite meets fungus—Fungus eats termite. Pest Control
(February), 42–43.
Rosset, P.M., 1997. Cuba: ethics, biological control, and crisis. Agricul-
ture and Human Values 14, 291–302.
Saito, T., 2005. Preliminary experiments to control the silverleaf whitefly
with electrostatic spraying of a mycoinsecticide. Applied Entomology
and Zoology 40, 289–292.
Samson, P.R., Milner, R.J., Sander, E.D., Bullard, G.K., 2005. Effect of
fungicides and insecticides applied during planting of sugarcane on
viability of Metarhizium anisopliae and its efficacy against white grubs.
BioControl 50, 151–163.
Santra, S.C., 2004. Envis Newsletter 5. Special Issue on Biopesticide.
University of Kalyan, India.
Scholte, E.-J., Knols, B.G.J., Samson, R.A., Takken, W., 2004. Entomo-
pathogenic fungi for mosquito control: a review. Journal of Insect
Science 4, 19.
Shah, P.A., Goettel, M., 1999. Directory of Microbial Control Products
and Services. Microbial Control Division, Society for Invertebrate
Pathology, Gainesville. Available online at http://www.sipweb.org/
directorymcp/directory.htm.
Shah, P.A., Pell, J.K., 2003. Entomopathogenic fungi as biological control
agents. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 61, 413–423.
Shternshis, M., 2004. Ecologically safe control of insect pests: the past, the
present and the future. In: Lartey, R.T., Caesar, A. (Eds.), Emerging
Concepts in Plant Health Management. Research Signpost, Kerala,
India, pp. 1–25.
Stetter, J., Lieb, F., 2000. Innovation in crop protection: trends in
research. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 39, 1724–
1744.
Stewart, A., 2001. Commercial biocontrol—Reality or fantasy? Austral-
asian Plant Pathology 30, 127–131.
Tengerdy, R.P., Szaka
´cs, G., 1998. Perspectives in agrobiotechnology.
Journal of Biotechnology 66, 91–99.
Triplehorn, C.A., Johnson, N.F., 2005. Borror and DeLong’s Introduc-
tion to the Study of Insects, sixth ed. Thompson Brooks/Cole,
Belmont, CA.
Vega, O.F.-L., 2005. Development, production and use of biopesticides in
Cuba. In: Roettger, U., Muschler, R. (Eds.), International Symposium
on Biopesticides for Developing Countries 2003. CATIE/GTZ, Tur-
rialba, Costa Rica, pp. 85–91.
Wraight, S.P., Carruthers, R.I., 1999. Production, delivery, and use of
mycoinsecticides for control of insect pests on field crop. In: Hall,
F.R., Menn, J.J. (Eds.), Biopesticides: Use and Delivery. Humana
Press, Totowa, NJ, pp. 233–269.
Wraight, S.P., Jackson, M.A., de Kock, S.L., 2001. Production, stabil-
ization and formulation of fungal biocontrol agents. In: Butt, T.M.,
Jackson, C., Magan, N. (Eds.), . Fungi as Biocontrol Agents: Progress,
Problems and Potential. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp.
253–287.
Zare, R., Gams, W., 2001. A revision of Verticillium section Prostrata IV.
The genera Lecanicillium and Simplicillium gen. nov. Nova Hedwigia
73, 1–50.
256 M.R. de Faria, S.P. Wraight / Biological Control 43 (2007) 237–256
... (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae), Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschn.) (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae), and M. flavoviride (Gams & Rozsypal 1956) have emerged as key players in the control against many pests, and they are found on various insects worldwide (Feng et al., 1994;Bridge et al., 2005;Faria & Wraight, 2007). Several bioinsecticide products based on entomopathogenic fungi, such as M. anisopliae, B. bassiana, and Isaria fumosorosea (Wize) Brown y Smith (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) have been effectively employed for insect pest control (Faria & Wraight, 2007). ...
... (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae), and M. flavoviride (Gams & Rozsypal 1956) have emerged as key players in the control against many pests, and they are found on various insects worldwide (Feng et al., 1994;Bridge et al., 2005;Faria & Wraight, 2007). Several bioinsecticide products based on entomopathogenic fungi, such as M. anisopliae, B. bassiana, and Isaria fumosorosea (Wize) Brown y Smith (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) have been effectively employed for insect pest control (Faria & Wraight, 2007). ...
... Applications made in the field have shown negative effects on pests exposed to direct sunlight (Faria & Wraight, 2007;Jackson et al., 2010). The spores of the B. bassiana fungus can lose their effectiveness when exposed to ultraviolet radiation (UV) (Fargues et al., 1996;Fernandes et al., 2007). ...
Article
The present study aims to investigate the effectiveness of various tea extracts in providing ultraviolet (UV) protection for entomopathogenic fungi. UV radiation could have detrimental effects on viability of these fungi, which are important biocontrol agents against insect pests. This study was carried out in the Microbiology Laboratory of the Department of Biology Karadeniz Technical University in 2023. We evaluated the UV protective properties of various tea extracts in entomopathogenic fungi [Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuil. (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) and Metharizium flavoviride (Gams and Rozsypal 1956) (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae)] and tea extracts effectiveness against Galleria mellonella (L.,1758) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae. Our findings demonstrate that certain tea extracts exhibit significant UV protection for entomopathogenic fungi, suggesting their potential application in improving the performance of biocontrol agents in outdoor environments. The highest UV-B protection was observed by adding black and green tea extracts to fungal spores, resulting in a radial growth measurement of 14.6 mm and 14.3 mm, respectively, at the end of 10 days of exposure for 120 minutes. These results contribute to the development of eco-friendly strategies for pest management in agriculture.
... O fungo Beauveria bassiana é um ascomiceto entomopatógeno encontrado em várias regiões do planeta e capaz de infectar mais de 700 espécies de artrópodes considerando os insetos e ácarospraga, ou seja, prejudiciais às plantas cultivadas e animais domésticos, os formulados à base de fungos entomopatogênicos são amplamente utilizados visando ao manejo dessas espécies, pois são seguros ao homem e ambiente. Além disso, alguns formulados são compatíveis com outros agrotóxicos, facilitando assim a sua utilização pelos produtores, pois podem ser manejados nos mesmos equipamentos disponíveis para aplicação do controle químico (DE FARIA;WRAIGHT, 2007). ...
... O fungo Beauveria bassiana é um ascomiceto entomopatógeno encontrado em várias regiões do planeta e capaz de infectar mais de 700 espécies de artrópodes considerando os insetos e ácarospraga, ou seja, prejudiciais às plantas cultivadas e animais domésticos, os formulados à base de fungos entomopatogênicos são amplamente utilizados visando ao manejo dessas espécies, pois são seguros ao homem e ambiente. Além disso, alguns formulados são compatíveis com outros agrotóxicos, facilitando assim a sua utilização pelos produtores, pois podem ser manejados nos mesmos equipamentos disponíveis para aplicação do controle químico (DE FARIA;WRAIGHT, 2007). ...
... While more than 700 different fungal species are known to be pathogenic to insects, only a few well-established genera, such as Beauveria, Metarhizium, Cordyceps and Akanthomyces, have been developed commercially as mycoinsecticides. These mycoinsecticides have been used to control a wide range of pests in forest, field, and greenhouse environments, as well as structural, household, and storage pests (de Faria and Wraight, 2007;Mascarin and Jaronski, 2016;Jaronski and Mascarin, 2017;Mascarin et al., 2019). Commercial formulations of several EA are currently available to farmers worldwide, and due to increased commercialization in the 21st century, the use of EA has expanded (Sharma et al., 2023). ...
... However, this wide array of products is based on no more than 27 fungal strains, with only 24 of them being originally isolated from insect hosts and the remaining three obtained from soil samples. Several of these strains are commercialized worldwide, as shown in Table 1 ( de Faria and Wraight, 2007;Mascarin and Jaronski, 2016;Jaronski and Mascarin, 2017;Mascarin et al., 2019;European Commission, 2023;EPA, 2023). Despite their potential benefits, the ecosystem services of EA have not been fully appreciated. ...
... Partially or fully engorged adult Hyalomma spp. were collected from the cattle using fine forceps stored at room temperature and identified using a given key [24]. Then, the ticks were brought to the lab to check for anti-tick activity against fungal isolates. ...
Article
Full-text available
Ticks pose a major threat to cattle health and production in Pakistan because they transmit pathogens of diseases like Babesiosis and Theileriosis. Hyalomma spp., found across Africa, Asia, and Europe, are especially problematic. This study explored biocontrol of Hyalomma spp. using spore-free fungal culture filtrates collected from dairy farm soil in Kohat, Pakistan. Three fungal species of the genera Alternaria, Aspergillus, and Penicillium were isolated, and their filtrates were tested against tick adults and larvae. Filtrate concentrations were prepared at different strengths. Data were taken after the exposure of adults and larvae ticks to various concentrations of the fungal filtrates. Results indicated that at 100% concentration, all fungal filtrates induced 100% mortality in adults and larvae. Decreasing filtrate concentration lowered tick mortality. The lowest concentration caused the least mortality. The effect was time- and dose-dependent. In conclusion, spore-free fungal culture filtrates can provide biocontrol of Hyalomma spp. in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. Further research should explore the active compounds causing mortality and optimal application methods. The process outlined here provides a natural biocontrol alternative to chemical pesticides to reduce tick infestations and associated cattle diseases in Pakistan.
... A number of studies have shown that entomopathogenic fungi play a vital role as biological agents for controlling insect populations in the natural environment, and several species of entomopathogenic fungi have already been harnessed for this purpose. Many bioinsecticides based on fungi are in regular use in integrated pest management programs, offering environmentally friendly alternatives to synthetic chemical insecticides [1][2][3][4]. One of the most promising species of entomopathogens is Conidiobolus coronatus, a cosmopolitan soil fungus of the Entomophthorales, which is known to infect a number of insects and various collembolans [5,6] and is known to produce secondary metabolites harmful to insects [5,[7][8][9][10][11][12]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Simple Summary To understand the mechanisms underlying the recognition of susceptible hosts by entomopathogenic fungi, it is critical to decipher the role of their cuticular lipids. The present study compared the effect of infection by the entomopathogenic fungus Conidiobolus coronatus (Constantin) Batko (Entomophthorales) on the larvae and adults of susceptible Galleria mellonella Linnaeus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and resistant Calliphora vicina Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Calliphoridae). The results indicate variations in the free fatty acid (FFA) profiles of the cuticles with regard to species and developmental stage and the changes occurring in them following contact with the fungus. Abstract The mechanisms underlying the recognition of a susceptible host by a fungus and the role of cuticular compounds (CCs) in this process remain unclear; however, accumulated data suggest that this is influenced to a great degree by cuticular lipids. Two insect species differing in their sensitivity to fungal infection, viz. the highly sensitive Galleria mellonella Linnaeus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and the resistant Calliphora vicina Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Calliphoridae), exhibited significant qualitative and quantitative changes in cuticular free fatty acid (FFA) profiles after exposure to Conidiobolus coronatus (Constantin) Batko (Entomopthorales). Despite being systematically distant, leading different lifestyles in different habitats, both insect species demonstrated similar changes in the same FFAs following exposure to the fungus (C12:0, C13:0, C14:0, C15:0, C16:1, C16:0, C18:1, C18:0), suggesting that these are involved in a contact-induced defense response. As it was not possible to distinguish the share of FFAs present in the conidia that were attached to the cuticle from the FFAs of the cuticle itself in the total number of extracted FFAs, further research is necessary.
... R 2 =0.99, para agrolita y polietileno de baja densidad, respectivamente (Figura 2). Muchas investigaciones se han enfocado en buscar las condiciones que conlleven a una alta producción de conidios, siendo estas las unidades infectivas y los ingredientes activos en la mayoría de las formulaciones de micoinsecticidas comercialmente disponibles en el mercado [14], en ese sentido surge el interés ...
Article
La producción de hongos entomopatógenos para el control de plagas agrícolas se ha vuelto una alternativa para evitar la aplicación de insecticidas químicos, los cuales han generado contaminación al medio ambiente. El hongo entomopatógeno Metarhizium anisopliae produce unidades infectivas denominadas conidios que son utilizados como ingrediente activo en formulaciones biológicas para regular poblaciones de insectos plaga, lo anterior representa una valiosa alternativa en la protección del ambiente y en el equilibrio de la flora y la fauna. El objetivo de esta investigación consistió en evaluar la porosidad del lecho de empaque modificada por la incorporación de agrolita (AG) y polietileno de baja densidad (PL) como agentes texturizantes mezclados con arroz precocido (AP) como sustrato, sobre la producción de conidios de la cepaMetarhizium anisopliae CP-OAX. La mayor producción de conidios sobre granos de arroz se alcanzó a los 12 días de cultivo. La adición de agrolita y el polietileno al lecho de cultivo es efectiva para aumentar la porosidad del lecho. Entre ambas estrategias, la adición de polietileno de baja densidad resultó más efectiva para la producción de conidios la cual resultó de 1.38x109 conidios por gramo de arroz seco inicial (conidios/gasi), con una porosidad de e=0.34 (mezcla AP-PL: 50-50). El rendimiento alcanzado representó un incremento de 2 veces más la producción de conidios en comparación con el tratamiento sin texturizante (AP-PL = 6.3x108 conidios/gasi). El polietileno es un texturizante adecuado para ser utilizado en cultivo sólido, ya que incrementa la producción de conidios del hongo Metarhizium anisopliae CP-OAX al modificar la porosidad de empaque, lo cual es un factor importante para considerar en la producción de unidades infectivas a gran escala.
Article
Full-text available
The Ephestia cautella (Walk) (Lepidoptera: Pyralida) is a crucial insect of storage products worldwide. The experiments were conducted to assess Entomopathogenic Fungi (EPFs) (two isolates) with commercial formulations, Met 52 EC ( Metarhizium anisopliae strain F52) and local entomopathogenic fungal isolates against Ephestia cautella . Commercial formulations of entomopathogenic fungal M. anisopliae affected the main mortality levels in the E.cautella adult at all three sporal concentrations (2×10 ⁴ , 2×10 ⁶ , 2×10 ⁸ spore/ml), compared to the local isolates of M. anisopliae . Corrected mortality of E.cautella adult caused by both Commercial and local M. anisopliae 7 days after exposure at 2 × 10 ⁸ spore/ml was 32±1.3 and 48 ± 1.4 %, respectively. 2 nd , 5 th instar larvae had a higher mortality level than the adults of E. cautella . The results reveal that Entomopathogenic Fungi isolated from the UK and Iraq can be applied as the microbial bio-agent control against E. castella . Consequently, more studies are required to develop commercial Entomopathogenic Fungi of naturally isolated.
Article
Full-text available
zet Fındığın ana zararlıları yanında, genel bir zararlı olan Mayıs böceği (Melolontha spp.) fındık bahçelerinde önemli verim kayıplarına ve bitkilerin kurumasına neden olmaktadır. Karadeniz Bölgesi böceklerle mücadelede önemli bir yere sahip olan entomopatojen mikroorganizmalar açısından oldukça zengin bir alandır. Ülkemizde fındık üretim alanlarından izole edilen entomopatojen fungus ve bakteriler laboratuvar koşullarında M. melolontha'ya karşı yüksek öldürücü etki göstermiş, ancak doğa koşullarında etkinliklerinin belirlenmesi konusunda herhangi bir çalışma bulunmadığı görülmüştür. Bu çalışmada Bacillus thuringiensis, Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae preparatlarının sera koşullarında Melolontha spp.'ye karşı etkinlikleri ve mikrobiyal mücadelede kullanım olanakları araştırılmıştır. Saksı denemesi sonunda 60. günde gerçekleştirilen sayım sonuçlarına göre; karşılaştırma ilacı chlorpyrfos-ethyl %100 ölüm oranı sağlarken bunu %82.5 ile B. thuringiensis ve B. bassiana izlemiş, M. anisopliae % 70 ölüm oranı sağlamıştır. Sonuçlar göstermektedir ki Melolontha spp. ile mücadelede entomopatojen fungus ve bakterilerden elde edilen peraparatlar başarılı şekilde kullanılma potansiyeline sahiptir. Anahtar kelimeler: Fındık, toprak altı zararlılar, entomopatojen mikroorganizma, biyolojik mücadele Abstract Besides the main pests of hazelnut, May beetle (Melolontha spp.) causes significant yield losses and drying of plants in hazelnut orchards. The Black Sea Region is a very rich area in terms of entomopathogenic microorganisms, which have an important place in the control of insects. Entomopathogenic fungi and bacteria isolated from hazelnut production areas in our country showed a high lethal effect against M. melolontha in laboratory conditions, but it was seen that there was no study on determining their effectiveness in natural conditions. In this study, the effectiveness of Bacillus thuringiensis, Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae preparations against Melolontha spp. in greenhouse conditions and their use in microbial control were investigated. After 60 days following application chlorpyrfos-ethyl provided 100% mortality, followed by B. thuringiensis and B. bassiana with 82.5%, M. anisopliae providing 70% mortality. The results show that preparations obtained from entomopathogenic fungi and bacteria have the potential to be used successfully against Melolontha spp.
Chapter
Full-text available
The sustainability in food security is the prime objective of modern world as humans are facing severe challenges of poverty and hunger at global level. Among these challenges, insect pests are considered the main competitors of humans on earth and arguably poses a significant threat to our agriculture, ecosystem and food security. Today, a number of important insect pests have occupied diverse parts of the earth and cause severe economic losses to our pre- and post-harvest agricultural commodities. An accurate assessment of anticipated risks associated with different pest control tactics is necessary to devise some viable ecofriendly pest management approaches for sustainable agricultural intensification. Hence, a detailed knowledge regarding the pest habitat and its biology is needed to identify the best suited pest control tactic. In this regard, integrated pest management techniques provide useful and viable solutions to manage notorious field pests and reduce crop yield losses without contaminating environment. This chapter highlights all important sustainable pest control tactics such as microbial, biological, botanicals, sterile insect technique, sex pheromones, nutrient management and biotechnological approaches in detail that provide useful insights for not only conserving beneficial biodiversity but also global environment for our forthcoming generations.
Article
With the aim of evaluate the thermal tolerance of twelve suspoemulsion formulations containing conidia of I. javanica (at low and high moisture content) as an active ingredient and the biological effectiveness in the greenhouse, we developed twelve oil-based formulations of I. javanica with canola, castor bean, corn, soybean, peanut and mineral oil and surfactant mixtures: six formulations with conidia at low humidity (5-7%) and six with conidia at higher humidity (40-50%). Formulations were developed using the HLB system; Span 80 (HLB 4.3) and Tween 80 (HLB 15) like surfactants were mixed with oils. Thermotolerance was evaluated after exposure to 45 °C for 2, 8 and 24 h. Additionally, to evaluate the functionality of the formulations, greenhouse bioassays were performed using tomato plants infested with Bemisia tabaci. To determine the viability and shelf life, 10 mL of each formulation was stored for 5 and 9 months, and the storage temperature oscillated between 12 and 34 °C (at typical room temperature), with 12 / 12 h light / dark cycles, after 9 months of storage. The viability of unformulated conidia and those contained in the formulations was >82% after exposure to 45 °C for 2 h. The B (mineral oil), C (corn, soybean and peanut oils), D (corn oil), E (canola and soybean oils), and F (castor oil) formulations (low humidity), unformulated conidia and PAE-SIN caused mortality ranging from 43-56%. The conidia in formulations on oil exhibited 53-65% viability at 24 h and were statistically similar to each other but significantly different from the conidia (unformulated) with the viability 5%; at 72 h, the viability of conidia in all formulations was 78-88%, and the values were statistically similar to each other but significantly different from that of the conidia (unformulated) with the viability 6%. The formulations evaluated in this work presented lethality in B. tabaci nymphs 1-4, it is also suggested that these formulations confer thermal protection acquired by the formulation since unformulated conidia are drastically affected. The humidity of the conidia in the moment of developing formulations is a factor that affects the final tolerance and the viability in the shelf life.
Chapter
Full-text available
This book presents topics on the development, improvement and commercialization of fungi for the biological control of pests, weeds and diseases which are of economic importance. Common themes such as production, formulation and application of technologies, biosafety, risk assessment and registration requirements are all covered. The book attempts to bring together scientists, industry and government agencies involved in all aspects of fungal biological control agents for the first time.
Article
Full-text available
Fungal diseases in insects are common and widespread and can decimate their populations in spectacular epizootics. Virtually all insect orders are susceptible to fungal diseases, including Dipterans. Fungal pathogens such as Lagenidium, Coelomomyces and Culicinomyces are known to affect mosquito populations, and have been studied extensively. There are, however, many other fungi that infect and kill mosquitoes at the larval and/or adult stage. The discovery, in 1977, of the selective mosquito-pathogenic bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner israelensis (Bti) curtailed widespread interest in the search for other suitable biological control agents. In recent years interest in mosquito-killing fungi is reviving, mainly due to continuous and increasing levels of insecticide resistance and increasing global risk of mosquito-borne diseases. This review presents an update of published data on mosquito- pathogenic fungi and mosquito- pathogen interactions, covering 13 different fungal genera. Notwithstanding the potential of many fungi as mosquito control agents, only a handful have been commercialized and are marketed for use in abatement programs. We argue that entomopathogenic fungi, both new and existing ones with renewed/improved efficacies may contribute to an expansion of the limited arsenal of effective mosquito control tools, and that they may contribute in a significant and sustainable manner to the control of vector-borne diseases such as malaria, dengue and filariasis.
Book
Sound formulation is a vital aspect of microbial products used to protect plants from pests and diseases and to improve plant performance. Formulation of Microbial Biopesticides is an in-depth treatment of this vitally important subject. Written by experts and carefully edited, this important title brings together a huge wealth of information for the first time within the covers of one book. The book is broadly divided into five sections, covering principles of formulation, organisms with peroral and contact modes of action, organisms with the power of search, and future trends. Each section contains comprehensive chapters written by internationally acknowledged experts in the areas covered; the book also includes three very useful appendices, cataloguing formulation additives, spray application criteria and terminology. This outstanding book is a vitally important reference work for anyone involved in the formulation of microbial biopesticides and should find a place on the shelves of agriculture and plant scientists, microbiologists and entomologists working in academic and commercial agrochemical situations, and in the libraries of all research establishments and companies where this exciting subject is researched, studied or taught.
Article
Recent advances on mass culture, stabilization and formulation, and market potential of mycoinsecticides (Beauveria bassania [B. bassiana], B. brongniartii, Lagenidium giganteum, Metarhizium anisopliae, M. anisopliae var. acridum, Paecilomyces fumosoroseus and Verticillium lecanii), mycoherbicides (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides [Glomerella cingulata], Phytophthora palmivora, Puccinia canalichlata and Colletotrichum truncatum) and antagonistic yeasts (Candida oleophila and Cryptococcus albidus) for the control of many insect pests, weeds and postharvest diseases, are presented.
Article
This book presents topics on the development, improvement and commercialization of fungi for the biological control of pests, weeds and diseases which are of economic importance. Common themes such as production, formulation and application of technologies, biosafety, risk assessment and registration requirements are all covered. The book attempts to bring together scientists, industry and government agencies involved in all aspects of fungal biological control agents for the first time.