ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

We develop a new penalty method to derive low-dimensional Galerkin models for fluid flows with time-dependent boundary conditions. We then outline a procedure based on bifurcation analysis in selecting the proper values of the penalty parameter(s) that yield asymptotically stable periodic solutions of the highest possible accuracy. We illustrate this new approach by studying flow past a circular cylinder using direct numerical simulation (DNS) data, and a wave-structure interaction problem using particle image velocimetry (PIV) data.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237
Stability and accuracy of periodic flow solutions obtained
by a POD-penalty method
S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis
Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, 182 George Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA
Received 14 May 2004; accepted 11 February 2005
Communicated by I. Mezic
We develop a new penalty method to derive low-dimensional Galerkin models for fluid flows with time-dependent boundary
conditions. We then outline a procedure based on bifurcation analysis in selecting the proper values of the penalty parameter(s)
that yield asymptotically stable periodic solutions of the highest possible accuracy. We illustrate this new approach by studying
flow past a circular cylinder using direct numerical simulation (DNS) data, and a wave-structure interaction problem using
particle image velocimetry (PIV) data.
© 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
MSC: 37E99; 65P99
Keywords: Penalty methods; Low-dimensional; Dynamical systems; Galerkin projections
1. Introduction
Low-dimensional systems for unsteady fluid flows, based on the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD), have
had mixed success in predicting the correct dynamics even at exactly the same set of parameters for which the POD
modes were obtained. Specifically, an erroneous state may be obtained after long-time integration even if the correct
periodic state is set to initialize the simulation—the numerical solution eventually drifts to a new erroneous state.
This has also been observed in other systems, for example in the Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equations [1]. Empirical
fixes based on artificial dissipation, e.g. [2], can only correct the dynamics in short-term integration, and more
rigorous procedures need to be followed to guarantee asymptotic stability, e.g. see [3].
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 401 863 1217; fax: +1 401 863 3369.
E-mail address: (G.E. Karniadakis).
0167-2789/$ – see front matter © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237 219
A distinction, however, should be made between autonomous low-dimensional dynamical flow systems and
non-autonomous ones. We have observed, for example in many POD studies with diverse flow systems [4,5], that
autonomous systems are more susceptible to this “drifting” while non-autonomous systems may reach asymptot-
ically stable and accurate states without incorporating any special treatment. An example of a non-autonomous
system is oscillatory flow past a circular cylinder. We have observed through accurate numerical integration of the
corresponding POD system (for millions of time steps) that asymptotic stable and accurate states can be reached,
at least for an external frequency close to the natural frequency of the system, i.e. the vortex shedding frequency in
this case.
The implementation of complicated boundary conditions in Galerkin systems has historically been a matter
of some controversy [6]; see also [7–9]. An in-depth study of boundary conditions for Galerkin POD systems
was performed in [10]. Herein we introduce a penalty method, similar in spirit with the “tau” method in spec-
tral methods [11], but more flexible in many aspects as we will see in this study. In particular, we will study
two different systems based on data obtained from direct numerical simulations (DNS) and experimental results
using particle image velocimetry (PIV) [12]. A new aspect of the current work is the use of the penalty param-
eter(s) as bifurcation parameter(s) in order to perform stability analysis using a standard package, e.g. AUTO
Penalty methods have been used in the past successfully in implementing boundary conditions for different
types of numerical discretizations. For example, finite difference schemes on complex geometries have been de-
veloped in [14] using a penalty method to impose Dirichlet boundary conditions. Also, a penalty method was
developed in [15] to enforce boundary conditions for shock-free compressible Navier–Stokes simulations. A
similar penalty method was used in imposing boundary vorticity constraints in [16]. In general, the penalty ap-
proach enforces the boundary conditions but also accounts for the governing equation at the boundary in a con-
tinuous manner, thus relaxing some of the numerical stiffness associated with very steep gradients at Dirichlet
From the fundamental point of view, we pose the following question:
Is there a range in the penalty parameter τfor which the periodic solutions of the flow system are asymptotically
stable, and are there any particular values of τfor which the solution is most accurate.
For full numerical discretizations of any type, the accuracy of the solution scales as the inverse of the penalty
parameter in well-resolved simulations. However, efficiency considerations require that a finite value for τmust
be used. As τ→∞we have a strong imposition of the boundary condition while for small values of τwe have a
weak imposition of the boundary conditions. The question then is how do low-dimensional discrete systems differ
from their “full-blown” counterparts in this respect? More importantly, should we impose the boundary conditions
for low-dimensional systems in a strong form or in a weak form. Intuitively, we expect to have stability above a
threshold value in τbut that does not imply good accuracy in predicting the flow dynamics.
The above are some of the issues we address in the current work. The outline of the paper is as follows: in the
next section, we describe the data sets based on which the POD-penalty system is derived. Then, the POD-penalty
formulation is given in some detail. Subsequently, the results of the bifurcation study using the penalty parameter are
presented for the two cases corresponding to DNS and experimental data. Finally, a summary and a brief discussion
is included in the last section.
2. Data gathering
We construct POD modes based on data obtained both from DNS as well as from experiments. We report here
on two prototype cases we have studied with the penalty method.
220 S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237
Fig. 1. Computational domain for DNS.
2.1. Direct numerical simulation
We consider flow past a circular cylinder for which both two- and three-dimensional POD models have been
time-dependentinflowpastacircular cylinder at Reynolds number Re =100and500. The inflow velocity is uniform
but oscillatory in time, and is given by
The amplitude of the forcing term A, is kept the same at A=0.1 for both Reynolds numbers. The forcing frequency
is chosen so that we have a lock-in (resonant) state; this is done by choosing the frequency to be close to the Strouhal
number which is 0.1667 for Re =100 and 0.22 for Re =500.
The computational domain is shown in Fig. 1. A time-dependent boundary condition is imposed at the inflow
boundary 1; periodicity is imposed on 3and 4while on 2the zero Neumann condition on velocity is im-
posed and the pressure is set to be zero. On the cylinder surface 5the no-slip boundary condition is prescribed.
Converged solutions were obtained using the spectral/hp element method [19]. The domain is discretized into
412 triangular elements while seventh-order Jacobi polynomial basis are used to obtain resolution independent
2.2. Particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) experiment
Here we consider wave interaction with a vertical, surface-piercing cylinder, see Fig. 2. This flow gives rise to
complex forms of wake structure due to the orbital particle trajectories of the incident wave, and the sweeping of
previously generated vortices past the cylinder due to the oscillatory nature of the wave. The cylinder is fixed and the
flow motion is sustained by the wave action. We will employ the experimental results obtained using particle image
velocimetry (PIV) by Yang and Rockwell [12]. For this flow there are two important non-dimensional parameters
that need to be specified: First, the Keulegan–Carpenter number defined by
KC =2πAo
in which Aois either the displacement amplitude of the cylinder motion or the amplitude of the oscillatory flow and
Dis the cylinder diameter. Secondly the Stokes number
in which fis the frequency of the motion and νis the kinematic viscosity.
S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237 221
Fig. 2. Experimental set up [12].
Quantitative images were obtained using a technique of high-image-density particle velocimetry (PIV). There
are 13 phased-averaged snapshots available for a time period T=0.89. These images will be used to extract the
POD modes. Details of the experiments and the imaging approach are described in detail in [12]. A brief summary
is given next.
The vertical, rigidly suspended cylinder, which is shown in the schematic of Fig. 2, was maintained stationary
during all experiments. It had a diameter of D=12.7mm and a length of L=876mm. The submerged length
of the cylinder was 700mm. The value of the Keulegan–Carpenter number were KC =2πAo/D =13.9atthe
depth of the laser sheet, which is indicated in Fig. 2 as 51mm beneath the quiescent free-surface. The amplitude
Aocorresponds to the radius of the particle orbit of the wave, which was also determined at the depth of 51mm.
Furthermore, the value of the Stokes number was β=fD2=164 for this experiment. The corresponding value
of Reynolds number is Re =KC ×β=2280.
3. POD-penalty systems
In order to employ time-dependent boundary conditions in low-dimensional models, we formulate a new method
to construct Galerkin systems. In particular, we incorporate the boundary conditions directly into the Navier–Stokes
equations as constraints, enforced via suitable penalty parameters. In the next section we will demonstrate how to
select the penalty parameters through bifurcation analysis in order to achieve asymptotically stable and accurate
periodic solutions.
222 S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237
Herewe employ the hierarchical POD modes as a trial basis to represent the velocity field. In addition, we employ
a Galerkin projection of the Navier–Stokes equations onto these modes to derive dynamical systems to simulate the
flow. Let us decompose the total flow field Vas
where U0is the time-averaged field. We express uas the linear combination of the POD modes as written in the
summation conventions:
u(x, y, t)=φu
j(x, y)aj(t),v(x, y, t)=φv
j(x, y)aj(t),
where aj(t) are the unknown coefficients and φ=(φu
v) defines the vector of the POD modal basis.
In the following we derive separately the low-dimensional system for the DNS data and the experimental
3.1. DNS: POD-penalty system
The Galerkin projection of the Navier–Stokes equations with penalty terms included onto the jth POD mode is
∂t +(V·∇)V+∇p1
Re 2V+τ1ϒ(x)(VU)dx=0,(2)
where τ1is the penalty parameter and Uis the imposed velocity at the inflow boundary 1(see Fig. 1). The
function ϒ(x) is defined as
ϒ(x)=1,ifxon 1
We note here that on boundary 1we do not impose any boundary conditions as it is now treated as part of the
interior domain. The treatment of the pressure term is of particular importance, so we analyze the corresponding
Galerkin projection by using the Gauss’s theorem to obtain
φj·npds. (4)
Obtaining the POD modes from DNS of an incompressible flow field leads to divergence-free eigenmodes, and
thus the pressure term inside the domain is eliminated (first term in the above equation). On the side bound-
aries 3and 4we assume periodicity and hence the pressure boundary terms cancel each other. On the outflow
boundary 2the pressure is set to zero in the corresponding DNS. The inflow boundary 1should not be in-
cluded in the computation of the second term of Eq. (4) since we have already included it in the Navier–Stokes
equations. Therefore, there is no contribution from the pressure on this boundary in the integration by parts pro-
cedure. Finally, on the cylinder boundary the test function is zero and thus there is no pressure contribution there
In summary, the Galerkin projection leads to the dynamical system:
dt=fj(a)Gj(a) (5)
S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237 223
with a=[a1,a
M], where Mis the number of POD modes. The term fj(a) includes the convective and
viscous terms and has the form:
Also, Gj(a) is the boundary penalty term, which is written as follows (in summation convention):
(UU0(y|1)) ·φj(y|1)dy,
where φm(y|n) means the function of yobtained by evaluating φmon n.
Since U(t) is time-dependent, we obtain a non-autonomous system. More details on the derivation of the above
formulation for the Navier–Stokes equation are presented in [20].
3.2. Experiment: POD-penalty system
The POD-penalty system for the experimental data is derived similarly. By referring to Fig. 3, we now employ
twopenalty terms τ1andτ2for the boundaries 1and 2, respectively.The Galerkin projection of the Navier–Stokes
equations with penalty terms onto the jth POD mode is now
∂t +(V·∇)V+∇p1
Re 2V+τ1ϒ1(x)(VU1
where the projection vector φjis defined as previously, and U1
are the velocity vectors at the boundaries 1
and 2, respectively (see Fig. 3). The function ϒi(x) is defined as
ϒi(x)=1,ifxon i
Unlike the earlier DNS study where the flow is two-dimensional, in this case the true flow is three-dimensional
but only a two-dimensional slice is visualized via PIV. Correspondingly, imposing the divergence-free condition
on the two-dimensional POD modes is not appropriate. To this end, we will employ the divergent POD modes and
let the penalty terms “counteract” the divergent contributions (first term of Eq. (4)); how accurate is this procedure
will be tested by the results presented in the next section. Intuitively, it can be justified as the penalty term controls
effectively the boundary mass fluxes (on 1and 2), and thus by adjusting the value of τ1and τ2, respectively,
we can counteract any mass sources or sinks due to the pressure contributions in the domain interior. The pressure
contributions from the boundaries vanish due to periodicity and Dirichlet boundary conditions, similarly to DNS
case. Regarding the representation of the time-dependent velocity boundary condition at 1and 2, we have found
that it is accurate to use a Fourier series with 16 Fourier modes to represent the time-periodic forcing at those
boundaries. A systematic investigation of this has been presented in [5].
The Galerkin projection of the two-dimensional governing equations leads to the dynamical system:
j(a) (8)
224 S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237
Fig. 3. Computational and PIV domains for KC =13.9.
with a=[a1,a
M], where Mis the number of POD modes. The term fj(a) has the same form as in Eq. (6).
The boundary penalty term G
j(a) is modified as follows:
U0(y|1)) ·φj(y|1)dy
U0(y|2)) ·φj(y|2)dy
3.3. Transformation to an autonomous system
In the next section we will show how to track periodic branches of the dynamical systems described by Eqs.
(5) and (8). However, in order to effectively use the AUTO dynamical system package [13] to track the periodic
branch, these non-autonomous systems need to be transformed to autonomous systems. To this end, we introduce
the nonlinear oscillators
βq p(p2+q2),dq
βp q(p2+q2).
This particular system has an asymptotically stable solution given by
βt) and q(t)=cos(ˆ
We then incorporate the nonlinear oscillator to the POD-penalty system in order to obtain an equivalent autonomous
S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237 225
3.3.1. DNS: POD-penalty autonomous system
system is
dt=p+ωq p(p2+q2),dq
dt=qωp q(p2+q2),
where a=[a1,a
M], fj(a) is given by Eq. (6) and Gj(a,p) is now defined as
((1.0+Ap, 0) U0(y|1)) ·φj(y|1)dy.
Therefore, we have replaced the term sin(ωt)inEq.(1) with p(t).
3.3.2. Experiment: POD-penalty autonomous system
The transformation of the non-autonomous system to an equivalent autonomous one for the case of POD-penalty
system derived from experimental data is somewhat more complicated. For this POD-penalty system, we have the
representation of the velocity vectors at the boundaries 1and 2in the form of Fourier series as
(yj,t)=A(i, j)
A(i,j )
T+B(i,j )
where Tis the period, Nthe number of Fourier modes (for this case N=16), yja grid boundary point, and i=1
or 2 for velocity vectors at the boundaries 1and 2, respectively.
We then can transform Eq. (8) into an equivalent autonomous system as follows:
where with a=[a1,a
M], fj(a) is the same as Eq. (6),p=[p1,p
N], q=[q1,q
N] and
n=1...N. Note that here ˆ
β=nπ/ T .
Correspondingly, G
j(a,p,q) is defined as
Here nyis the number of grid points on 1and 2, and wkis the weight for the trapezoid integration.
226 S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237
4. Results
4.1. DNS: Galerkin POD-penalty system
The Galerkin POD-penalty systems for Reynolds number Re =100 and 500 are derived by employing 100
snapshots per period for both cases. We first present representative results of the stability of these solutions and
subsequently we investigate their accuracy.
4.1.1. Stability of periodic solutions
Here, we study stability of the solutions of the Galerkin POD-penalty model through bifurcation analysis. We
choose the bifurcation parameter to be the penalty constant τ1. In order to use the AUTO bifurcation tracking
package, for this case, the asymptotically stable periodic solution must be provided—this of course is not known a
priori. To this end, we assume a constant (typically large) value of τ1and obtain the corresponding solution of the
non-autonomous system. However, it is not certain that this solution will have the same period as the forcing period
orevenbeingperiodic [21–23]. Toovercomethis,we will studythe stability of theparticular solution for thatspecific
value of τ1using Poincar´
e maps, following the work of [24–26]. Specifically, we have obtained the stability of the
periodic solution using Poincar´
e maps, which we used to find the return times of the periodic solution, following
procedures outlined in [24,25]. We then employed the algorithm in [26] in order to find the Floquet multipliers of
the periodic solution.
Let us examine a specific case to illustrate this approach. We consider the low Reynolds number Re =100 case
with the number of POD modes M=6 and integrate Eq. (5) for a few values of the penalty parameter, say in
the range of τ1[2000,3000]. We found, through the Poincar´
e map, that in this range an asymptotically stable
periodic solution does indeed exist. Hence, we can choose any value of τ1[2000,3000] to apply AUTO in order
to study stability of periodic solutions more systematically. We also found that the period of the asymptotic state
is T=5.9988 while the corresponding period from the full DNS is identical to this value. As we will show in the
next section, agreement in the period does not imply agreement in the flow field dynamics between the DNS and
the low-dimensional system.
Repeating this procedure with higher truncations at M=10 and 20 at the same Reynolds number, we found
similarly asymptotically stable periodic states, which can be used as starting points for the AUTO bifurcation
analysis. A similar study was performed for the POD-penalty system at Reynolds number Re =500 for M=6,
10 and 20 POD modes. With the penalty parameter τ1=3000, the system posses an asymptotically stable solution
with period T=4.5454, which is in agreement with the results from the full DNS. Other large values of the penalty
parameter yield similar results. After obtaining the asymptotically stable periodic solution, we use it as a starting
point for AUTO, and track the stability of the periodic solution by decreasing τ1until loss of stability is detected.
This produces the lowest value of the penalty parameter that guarantees stability. Specifically, for all the systems
examined here loss of stability shows bifurcation into a torus. The results of this analysis for both Reynolds numbers
are listed in Table 1, where in the third column the minimum values of τ1for stability are presented.
Table 1
Values of penalty parameter for stability and accuracy requirements
Re Modes Lowest penalty parameter for stability Best penalty parameter for accuracy
Re =100 6 5.24127 5200
10 5.23467 6000
20 3.20842 6500
Re =500 6 1.39258 9000
10 1.26819 2.5×105
20 1.27168 3.0×106
S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237 227
Fig. 4. Simulation using M=10 POD modes for Re =100, τ1=5×105. DNS: ; POD-penalty simulation: solid line.
4.1.2. Accuracy of periodic solutions
We now turn our attention to the accuracy of the flow dynamics predicted by the low-dimensional system at
different values of the τ1parameter. In Fig. 4 we plot the phase portraits predicted by the POD-penalty system for
τ1=500,000 against the DNS corresponding results for the system with truncation at M=10. At this value of
τ1an asymptotically stable state is obtained with the correct time period but as can be observed in this plot the
accuracy in the flow dynamics is poor. In order to improve this accuracy we first define a relative error for each
penalty parameter by
where a
iand Q
iare the maximum of the predicted POD modal coefficients corresponding to the low-dimensional
system and DNS, respectively.
In Fig. 5 we plot the results of the bifurcation analysis for Re =100 and M=10 for the first four POD modes.
We see that for the higher values of the penalty parameter τ1the accuracy of a
icompared to Q
iis worse than for
228 S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237
Fig. 5. Bifurcation diagram using M=10 POD modes for Re =100. a
icorresponds to solid line and denotes the maximum of the POD-penalty
coefficients. Q
i, denoted by dash line, is the corresponding maximum coefficient of the DNS predictions.
the lower values of τ1. Similar results are also observed for the case of Re =100 with M=6 and 20, and also at
Re =500 with M=6. However, this trend is not universal. For example, for the truncation M=20 at Re =500
(see results in Fig. 6), the agreement in the flow dynamics is good for large values of τ1but there is a lower bound
of the penalty parameter τ1below which this agreement is lost. Similar results were obtained at Re =500 with
M=10. Therefore, it is the combination of the penalty parameter and truncation parameter for certain complexity
in the flow dynamics (here governed by the Reynolds number) that determines the quality of the prediction in the
POD-penalty system.
InFig.7,therelativeerror, defined in Eq. (10), is plottedagainstthepenaltyparameterinordertodeterminethebest
penalty parameter for the case Re =100 with M=10. The best penalty parameter is found to be approximately
6000. A qualitatively different result is provided in Fig. 8, where the relative error for the case Re =500 with
Fig. 6. Bifurcation diagram using M=20 POD modes for Re =500. The legend is as in Fig. 5.
S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237 229
Fig. 7. Left: relative error for the POD-penalty model with respect to DNS with M=10 POD modes for Re =100, and a close-up on the right.
M=20 is plotted against the penalty parameter. Here we find that the error decreases monotonically with the
penalty parameter but above some value, much greater than the stability bound, the accuracy saturates.
A summary of our studies to determine the best values of the penalty parameter τ1for the best possible accuracy
is presented in the last column of Table 1. Following the results of the bifurcation analysis, we then performed
integration of the POD-penalty system using the parameters in Table 1. The corresponding results for two typical
cases are shown in Fig. 9 for Re =100 and Fig. 10 for Re =500. For the latter case we observed the following: for
the simulation of the POD-penalty system with M=10, the system can predict correctly up to the fifth mode while
the prediction of higher modes is erroneous. When we increase the number of modes in the system to M=20, the
accuracy of prediction of the dynamics is much better, i.e. good accuracy is now obtained up to 15th mode, see
Fig. 11. We recall that these two cases correspond to a lower bound in the penalty parameter for best accuracy as
determined by the bifurcation analysis. This finding could possibly suggest that for cases with a lower bound for
the most effective penalty parameter a higher truncation is required to achieve better accuracy; it is not clear if this
result will be true in other flow problems, however. We also note that integrating the POD-penalty Galerkin system
Fig. 8. Relative error for the POD-penalty model with respect to DNS with M=20 POD modes for Re =500, and a close up on the right.
230 S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237
Fig. 9. Simulation using M=10 POD modes for Re =100, τ1=6000. DNS: ; POD-penalty simulation: solid line.
requires approximately 10 periods to reach an asymptotically stable state even if the “exact” DNS conditions are
used in the initialization process.
In summary, the lesson learned from the DNS study is that above a certain threshold in the value of penalty
parameter, stability of the periodic solution is obtained. However, the best accuracy may be obtained for specific
values of the penalty parameter that seem to depend strongly on the flow dynamics and the truncation in the
POD-penalty low-dimensional system.
4.2. Experiment: Galerkin POD-penalty system
In this section, we will present the results for the POD-penalty for the experimental data. We have used two
truncations in the number of modes here, M=6 and 12. The number of Fourier modes that represents the periodic
time-dependent boundary condition is set to N=16. For this POD-penalty model, there are two penalty parameters
τ1andτ2that need to be specified. However,wewill adopt here a procedure where we trackthese penalty parameters
by fixing one of them at a point that the asymptotically stable periodic solution for the POD-penalty system is
obtained. As in the previous study with DNS data, this asymptotically stable periodic solution might not be accurate
S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237 231
Fig. 10. Simulation using M=20 POD modes for Re =500, τ1=4×106. DNS: ; POD-penalty simulation: solid line.
but it will be used as a starting point for AUTO to track the minimum value of either τ1and τ2for asymptotic
stability of the periodic solutions.
4.2.1. Stability of periodic solutions
From preliminary numerical experiments for both M=6 and 12 we have determined that at τ1=1000 and
τ2=1000 the corresponding POD-penalty systems possess an asymptotically stable solution; see Fig. 12 for these
specific parameters. As in the previous case with the DNS data, the periodic solution is then studied through the
e map to examine its stability. We have found that the periodic solution for these specific penalty parameters
is indeed asymptotically stable with period of T=0.89, which is in agreement with the data from PIV.
Havingdeterminedthe starting pointfor AUTO,thetracking of stabilityof the periodicsolution is then performed
by fixing τ1=1000 and decreasing τ2until loss of stability is detected. We then switch the role of τ1and τ2and
perform an analogous analysis. This study produces the lowest values of the penalty parameter for stability, and the
corresponding results are presented in Table 2. We have found that for both values of M=6 and 12 the periodic
solution loses its stability when one of the Floquet multipliers crosses the unit circle at 1. This was also observed
232 S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237
Fig. 11. Higher modes from the simulation using M=20 POD modes for Re =500, τ1=4×106. DNS: ; POD-penalty simulation: solid
for M=6 with τ2=1000 fixed while varying τ1. However, in the case of the truncation with M=12 the periodic
solution loses its stability when one of the Floquet multipliers crosses the unit circle at 1.
4.2.2. Accuracy of periodic solutions
In order to find the most effective values of the penalty parameters that produces the most accurate asymptotically
stable periodic solution compared to the data from PIV, we also track the periodic branch by increasing τ1or
Table 2
Values of penalty parameters for stability limit and accuracy requirement for the POD-penalty system corresponding to experiment with
Re =2280
Modes Lowest penalty parameter for stability Best penalty parameters for accuracy
τ1=1000 τ2=1000 τ1=1000 τ2=1000
M=6 201.237 27.935 2×105,7.5×104
M=12 142.652 601.109 2×1077.5×107
Corresponding asymptotically stable periodic solution has a relative error greater than 5%.
S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237 233
Fig. 12. Simulation using M=12 POD modes for PIV data, τ1=1000, τ2=1000. PIV: ; POD-penalty simulation: solid line.
τ2while fixing the other one at 1000. Then, we compute the relative error in order to find the best value of
the penalty parameter for accuracy. In Fig. 13, the relative error is presented for the case of M=12 with fixed
τ2=1000. A summary of best values of the penalty parameter for all cases is presented in the last column of Table
2. Using the values from the table we then integrate in time the POD-penalty system to reach the asymptotic stable
periodic states. The results of such simulations are presented in Figs. 14 and 15 as phase portraits. There is very
good agreement with the corresponding experimental data with the higher truncation giving higher accuracy, as
5. Summary
We have developed a Galerkin POD-penalty method to construct low-dimensional dynamical systems for un-
steady fluid flows with time-dependent boundary conditions. Penalized boundaries are incorporated directly in the
Galerkin statement of the Navier–Stokes equations, and thus information about the pressure field on such bound-
aries is not required. The resulting dynamical system is non-autonomous, so we couple it to an equivalent nonlinear
oscillator in order to study its stability using standard bifurcation analysis.
234 S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237
Fig. 13. Relative error for the POD-penalty model from PIV data. Here, M=12 with fixed τ2, and a close up on the right.
Fig. 14. Simulation using M=6 POD modes for PIV data, τ1=7.5×104,τ2=1000. PIV: ; POD-penalty simulation: solid line.
S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237 235
Fig. 15. Simulation using M=12 POD modes for PIV data, τ1=8×107,τ2=1000. PIV: ; POD-penalty simulation: solid line.
We study the stability and accuracy of periodic solutions using the penalty parameter(s) as bifurcation param-
eter(s). We consider two prototype flows based on results from direct numerical simulations (flow past a circular
cylinder), and from experiments (wave–structure interaction). The results from both studies are qualitatively similar.
We find that there is a threshold value of the penalty parameter above which asymptotic stability of the periodic
solution is guaranteed. This is an expected result, similar to what is known for numerical discretizations of Navier
Stokes equations. The surprising, however, finding is that the accuracy of the solution predicted by the Galerkin
POD-penalty system does not improve as the penalty parameter increases, as it is the case for full numerical dis-
cretizations. Instead, there is a specific range within which the solution is accurate. In particular, depending on the
number of modes (i.e. truncation) and the flow complexity (i.e. Reynolds number) the best solution may correspond
to a specific value of the penalty parameter or a range well above the threshold value for stability.
In numerical discretizations that employ the penalty approach to impose Dirichlet or other type of boundary
conditions,asthe penalty parameter approachesa very large number (e.g. inverseofmachineprecision)theboundary
conditions are imposed exactly, i.e. in a strong form. Correspondingly, the error in the solution scales inversely
proportional to the penalty parameter. Our findings here suggest that for low-dimensional systems, imposing the
boundary conditions in a strong form may lead to an erroneous solution. Similar trends have been observed in
spectral penalty methods for simulations of high Reynolds number turbulence at relatively low resolution [27]. This
236 S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237
can have great consequences in constructing effective low-dimensional dynamical systems as well as in formulating
proper boundary conditions in large-eddy simulations. However, generalization of this conclusion to other flow
problems has to be tested very carefully.
The first author gratefully acknowledges the Development and Promotion of Science and Technology Talents
(DPST) project from Thailand for providing his scholarship during his graduate studies at Brown University. The
authors would like to thank Dr. Y. Yang and Prof. D. Rockwell for providing PIV data. This work was supported
by ONR and NSF, and computations were performed at the facilities of NCSA (University of Illinois at Urbana-
Champaign) and at DoDs NAVO MSRC.
[1] N. Aubry, W.Y. Lian, E.S. Titi, Preserving symmetries in the proper orthogonal decomposition, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 14 (2) (1993)
[2] W. Cazemier, R.W. Verstappen, A.E. Veldman, Proper orthogonal decomposition and low-dimensional models for driven cavity flows,
Phys. Fluids 10 (7) (1998) 1685–1699.
[3] S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis, A spectral viscosity method for correcting the long-term behavior of POD models, J. Comp. Phys. 194 (1)
(2004) 92–116.
[4] X. Ma, G.E. Karniadakis, H. Park, M. Gharib, DPIV-driven flow simulation: a new computational paradigm, Proc. R. Soc. London A 459
(2031) (2003) 547–565.
[5] S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis, Y. Yang, D. Rockwell, Wave-structure interaction: simulation driven by quantitative imaging, Proc. R. Soc.
London A 460 (2043) (2004) 729–755.
[6] X. Zhou, L. Sirovich, Coherence and chaos in a model of turbulent boundary layer, Phys. Fluid A 4 (12) (1992) 2855–2874.
[7] G. Berkooz, P. Holmes, J.L. Lumley, N. Aubry, E. Stone, Observations regarding ‘Coherence and chaos in a model of turbulent boundary
layer’ by X. Zhou and L. Sirovich [Phys. Fluids A 4 (1992) 2855], Phys. Fluid 6 (4) (1994) 1574–1578.
[8] L. Sirovich, X. Zhou, Reply to ‘Observations regarding ‘Coherence and chaos in a model of turbulent boundary layer’ by X. Zhou and L.
Sirovich, [Phys. Fluids A 4 (1992) 2855], Phys. Fluid 6 (4) (1994) 1579–1582.
[9] P. Holmes, J.L. Lumley, G. Berkooz, Turbulence, Coherence Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry, Cambridge University Press,
[10] J.F. Gibson, Dynamical Systems Models of Wall-Bounded, Shear-Flow Turbulence, PhD thesis, Cornell University, 2002.
[11] D. Gottlieb, S.A. Orszag, Numerical Analysis of Spectral Methods: Theory and Applications, SIAM-CMBS, Philadelphia,
[12] Y. Yang, D. Rockwell, Wave interaction with a vertical cylinder: spanwise flow patterns and loading, J. Fluid Mech. 460 (2002) 93–
[13] E.J. Doedel, R.C. Paffenroth, A.R. Champneys, T.F. Fairgrieve, Yu.A. Kuznetsov, B. Sandstede, X. Wang, Auto 2000. Continuation and
bifurcation software for ordinary differential equations (with homcont). Technical Report, Caltech, 2001.
[14] S. Abarbanel, A. Ditkowski, Asymptotically stable fourth-order accurate schemes for the diffusion equation on complex shapes, J. Comp.
Phys. 133 (2) (1996) 279–288.
[15] J.S. Hesthaven, D. Gottlieb, A stable penalty method for the compressible Navier–Stokes equations. I. Open boundary conditions, SIAM
J. Sci. Comput. 17 (3) (1996) 579–612.
[16] J. Trujillo, G.E. Karniadakis, A penalty method for the vorticity–velocity formulation, J. Comp. Phys. 149 (1999) 32–58.
[17] A.E. Deane, I.G. Kevrekidis, G.E. Karniadakis, S.A. Orszag, Low-dimensional models for complex geometry flows: application to grooved
channels and circular cylinders, Phys. Fluids A 3 (10) (1991) 2337–2354.
[18] X. Ma, G.E. Karniadakis, A low-dimensional model for simulating 3D cylinder flow, J. Fluid Mech. 458 (2002) 181–190.
[19] G.E. Karniadakis, S.J. Sherwin, Spectral/hp Element Methods for CFD, Oxford University Press, 1999.
[20] S. Sirisup, Issues in low-dimensional modeling of unsteady flows: convergence, asymptotic stability and reconstruction procedures, PhD
thesis, Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, 2005.
[21] T.A. Burton, Stability and Periodic Solutions of Ordinary and Functional Differential Equations, Academic Press, 1985.
[22] T. Yoshizawa, Stability Theory and the Existence of Periodic Solutions and Almost Periodic Solutions, Springer-Verlag, 1975.
S. Sirisup, G.E. Karniadakis / Physica D 202 (2005) 218–237 237
[23] G.Makay,On some possibleextensionsofMassera’s theorem, ProceedingsoftheSixthColloquium on the QualitativeTheoryofDifferential
Equations (In EJ Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations), vol. 16, 2000, pp. 1–8.
[24] M. Hannon, On the numerical computation of Poincar´
e maps, Physica D 5 (1982) 412–414.
[25] W. Tucker, Computing accurate Poincar´
e maps, Physica D 171 (3) (2002) 127–137.
[26] R. Seydel, Practical Bifurcation and Stability Analysis: From Equilibrium to Chaos, Springer-Verlag, 1994.
[27] P.J. Diamessis, J.A. Domaradzki, J.S. Hesthaven, A spectral multidomain penalty method model for the simulation of high Reynolds
number localized incompressible stratified turbulence, J. Comput. Phys. 202 (1) (2005) 298–322.
... In literature [14][15][16][17], different approaches to control the ROM BCs can be found of which two common approaches are extended and compared in this work: the lifting function method and the penalty method. The aim of the lifting function method [15,17] is to homogenize the BCs of the basis functions contained in the reduced subspace, while the penalty method [14][15][16]18] weakly enforces the BCs in the ROM with a penalty factor. A disadvantage of the penalty method is that it relies on a penalty factor that has to be tuned with a sensitivity analysis or numerical experimentation [18]. ...
... The aim of the lifting function method [15,17] is to homogenize the BCs of the basis functions contained in the reduced subspace, while the penalty method [14][15][16]18] weakly enforces the BCs in the ROM with a penalty factor. A disadvantage of the penalty method is that it relies on a penalty factor that has to be tuned with a sensitivity analysis or numerical experimentation [18]. Therefore, an iterative method is presented for tuning the penalty factor, which is, to the best of the authors' knowledge, introduced here for the first time in the context of Finite-Volume based POD-Galerkin reduced order methods. ...
... Standard Galerkin projection-based reduced order models are unreliable when applied to the non-linear unsteady Navier-Stokes equations [19]. Furthermore, the ROMs need to be stabilized in order to produce satisfactory results for both the velocity and pressure fields [18,[20][21][22][23][24]. Two different stabilization techniques are compared in [25]; the supremizer enrichment of the velocity space in order to meet the inf-sup condition (SUP) and the exploitation of a pressure Poisson equation during the projection stage (PPE). ...
... This requires a huge computing time using standard numerical solvers [1][2][3]. A way to avoid this is the use of reduced-order models, i.e., reduced basis [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] or proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] models. Reduced models are based on the fact that, for dissipative evolution equations, a finite low-dimensional manifold contains the longterm behavior of the system [21][22][23][24][25]. ...
... Thus, the maximum number of grid points is N = 36 × 14 = 504. The integrals in Equations (15)- (18) and the usual L 2 scalar product are performed with the Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto quadrature formulas [57]. Then, G is the diagonal matrix whose elements are the Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto weights. ...
... The L 2 norm of the difference between both solutions is order O(10 −2 ). Then, we solve the Galerkin/POD linear stability Problem (17) and (18) for Φ 3 (R). The first eigenfunction of the solution Φ 3 (1900), computed with the POD method, can be seen in Figure 8c. ...
Full-text available
A Galerkin/POD reduced-order model from eigenfunctions of non-converged time evolution transitory states in a problem of Rayleigh–Bénard is presented. The problem is modeled in a rectangular box with the incompressible momentum equations coupled with an energy equation depending on the Rayleigh number R as a bifurcation parameter. From the numerical solution and stability analysis of the system for a single value of the bifurcation parameter, the whole bifurcation diagram in an interval of values of R is obtained. Three different bifurcation points and four types of solutions are obtained with small errors. The computing time is drastically reduced with this methodology.
... The nature of the aerodynamic flows yield non-linear unsteady partial differential equations whose computation requires numerical deforming near field to the stationary far field. The POD-Galerkin reduced order modelling approach has been applied to simulate Fluid-Structure Interaction problems [9][10][11][12][13][14]. Liberge, et al. [2,14] introduced a modified POD-Galerkin reduced order modelling of the Navier-Stokes equation for an oscillating cylinder. ...
... Xiao, et al. [13] proposed a different method to this topic by implementing non-intrusive functions to stabilise the solutions of the POD model. For unsteady flow problems, Sirisup & Karniadakis proposed a modified POD model by introducing penalty functions [11]. Most of these work focus on the FSI problem with a moving fluid structure interface and therefore the deformation of the solid domain is still lacking of research via the reduced order modelling approach [15][16][17][18][19]. ...
... In these circumstances, an additional effort has to be made for the treatment of the inhomogeneous velocity boundary conditions at the ROM level. The common strategies for tackling this issue are the lifting function method [39,40,50] and the penalty method [21,5,13,59,87]. A brief description of the two methods will be given and then the strategy of incorporating them inside the PINN formulation will be addressed. ...
Full-text available
We present a Reduced Order Model (ROM) which exploits recent developments in Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for solving inverse problems for the Navier--Stokes equations (NSE). In the proposed approach, the presence of simulated data for the fluid dynamics fields is assumed. A POD-Galerkin ROM is then constructed by applying POD on the snapshots matrices of the fluid fields and performing a Galerkin projection of the NSE (or the modified equations in case of turbulence modeling) onto the POD reduced basis. A $\textit{POD-Galerkin PINN ROM}$ is then derived by introducing deep neural networks which approximate the reduced outputs with the input being time and/or parameters of the model. The neural networks incorporate the physical equations (the POD-Galerkin reduced equations) into their structure as part of the loss function. Using this approach, the reduced model is able to approximate unknown parameters such as physical constants or the boundary conditions. A demonstration of the applicability of the proposed ROM is illustrated by two cases which are the steady flow around a backward step and the unsteady turbulent flow around a surface mounted cubic obstacle.
... The proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) technique was used. The method was used for flow control, identification of flow dynamics, model order reduction and the parametric estimation of various thermo-fluid system performance factors [66][67][68][69]. The dataset for the local Nu along the R-C was collected for different values of Re, Rew and Ha. ...
Full-text available
The cooling performance of jet impinging hybrid nanofluid on a rotating hot circular cylinder was numerically assessed under the effects of multiple magnetic fields via finite element method. The numerical study was conducted for different values of Reynolds number (100 ≤ Re ≤ 300), rotational Reynolds number (0 ≤ Rew ≤ 800), lower and upper domain magnetic field strength (0 ≤ Ha ≤ 20), size of the rotating cylinder (2 w ≤ r ≤ 6 w) and distance between the jets (6 w ≤ H ≤ 16 w). In the presence of rotation at the highest speed, the Nu value was increased by about 5% when Re was increased from Re = 100 to Re = 300. This value was 48.5% for the configuration with the motionless cylinder. However, the rotations of the cylinder resulted in significant heat transfer enhancements in the absence or presence of magnetic field effects in the upper domain. At Ha1 = 0, the average Nu rose by about 175%, and the value was 249% at Ha1 = 20 when cases with the cylinder rotating at the highest speed were compared to the motionless cylinder case. When magnetic field strengths of the upper and lower domains are reduced, the average Nu decreases. The size of the cylinder is influential on the flow dynamics and heat transfer when the cylinder is rotating. An optimum value of the distance between the jets was obtained at H = 14 w, where the Nu value was highest for the rotating cylinder case. A modal analysis of the heat transfer dynamics was performed with the POD technique. As diverse applications of energy system technologies with impinging jets are available, considering the rotations of the cooled surface under the combined effects of using magnetic field and nanoparticle loading in heat transfer fluid is a novel contribution. The outcomes of the present work will be helpful in the initial design and optimization studies in applications from electronic cooling to convective drying, solar power and many other systems
... Therefore, phase transition time is expected to be increased with higher aspect ratio (x1). Impacts of aspect ratio on the streamline variations for the case with rotational surface effects are shown in [60][61][62][63][64]. In convective HT, POD based modeling approach has also bee considered in many studies [65][66][67]. ...
In the present work, coupled effects of forced convection, rotational conic surface and magnetic field on the phase change dynamics are numerically explored by using finite element method for a phase change material (PCM) filled 3D cylindrical reactor. The PCM filled region has a conic shape and it is rotating. The study is conducted for various values of rotational Re number (between 0 and 2500), magnetic field strength (Hartmann number between 0 and 30) and conic surface aspect ratio (between 1 and 2). It is observed that the coupled interactions between the rotational surface and magnetic field significantly affect the phase change process dynamics and convective heat transfer between different phases. Optimum value of rotational Reynolds number for minimum complete phase transition time is achieved at Rew = 1000. The magnetic field has a positive impact on the phase change process while it is impact is profound without surface rotation. There are 98% and 65% reductions in the complete phase transition times when configurations at Rew = 1000 are compared with motionless conic surface case in the absence and presence of magnetic field. The effects of rotation are profound when different aspect ratios of the PCM filled region is considered. The transition time is increased up to 553% without rotation while this value is only 86% when cases with lowest and highest aspect ratio are compared. A modal analysis with 30 mode is used to capture the phase change dynamics and coupled interactions between the rotational surface and magnetic field on the variation of liquid fraction.
... The PODmodal coefficients which depend upon various parameters are modeled by using polynomial type regression models. POD based modeling methods and other soft computing techniques are frequently used in energy system technologies for flow control, prediction and model order reduction [60][61][62][63][64][65]. In turbulent flow, coherent flow structures can be identified by using POD [66] and in many heat transfer applications, POD based modeling approach has also been used [67,68]. ...
Performance features of a thermoelectric system mounted in a chaotic channel with non-Newtonian power law fluid are numerically explored with finite element method. The analysis is performed for different values of Re number of the hot and cold fluid streams (250⩽Re⩽1000), power law indices (0.75⩽n⩽1.25) and solid volume fraction of alumina (0⩽ϕ⩽4%) in water. It is observed that the fluid type with different power law indices significantly affected the electric potential variations and power generation of the thermoelectric system. Impacts of Re number on the power generation enhancement amount depends upon the power law index. The power rises by about 123.78%, 94.13% and 52.30% at the highest Re for different power law index combinations of (0.75,0.75), (0.75,12.5) and (1.25,1.25), respectively. Thermoelectric power reduces by about 39.71% for shear thinning fluids in both channels while it rises by about 43.48% for shear thickening fluids in chaotic channels. The potential of using nanofluids is more when both channels contain shear thinning fluids. Nanofluids rise the power of thermoelectric system by about 31%, 29% and 28% for the case when the hot side fluid is shear thinning, Newtonian and shear thickening fluid types while the cold side chaotic channel is shear thinning. When constant and varying interface temperature configurations are compared, there is at most 3% variations in the generated power while the trends in the curves for varying parameters are similar. The computational cost of constant interface temperature and computations only in the thermoelectric domains are much cheaper as compared to high fidelity coupled computational fluid dynamics simulations. The temperature field in the whole computational domain is approximated by using POD based approach with nine modes. A polynomial type regression model is used for POD-modal coefficients while fast and accurate results for interface temperatures are obtained.
Convective heat transfer and phase changing process are analyzed for flow over facing step in a channel equipped with double rotating circular cylinders and phase change- packed bed (PCM-PB) under magnetic field. The favorable and opposing effects of using magnetic field with rotations on phase change and thermal performance for separated flow in PCM-PB installed system are numerically explored by using the finite element method. Base fluid with hybrid particle loading of 2% solid volume fraction is used. The analysis is performed for various values of rotational Reynolds number (Rew: -1000 and 1000), cylinder sizes (R:0.01 and 0.3), size ratio (SR:0.5 and 2) and Hartmann number (Ha: 0 and 20). When rotations are active, phase change becomes inefficient due to the establishment of the vortices near the PCM-PB zone. Complete phase transition time (tC) depends upon the rotational direction of the cylinders and fluid type. As compared to case at Rew=0, tC rises up to 175% at Rew=1000 by using pure fluid while using nanofluid reduces the tC value. The size and size ratio of the cylinders are highly influential on the vortex size behind the step which affects the phase transition dynamics. There are 185% and 172% variations in the tC values are observed when size and size rations are varied. The case with the PCM+nanofluid gives the highest Nusselt number (Nu) while lowest Nu is obtained when pure fluid without PCM is used. The average Nu rises with larger cylinders for counter clockwise rotations at the highest speed. Magnetic field suppresses the vortices and contributes positively to the phase change process and thermal performance while reduction of tC is up to 74% is obtained at Rew=-1000 by using magnetic field at the highest strength. Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) is used for fluid and solid temperature reconstruction in the whole computational domain. The model captures the dynamic behavior of phase change and heat transfer under combined effects of double rotations and magnetic field with PCM-PB embedded channel with area expansion.
We focus on steady and unsteady Navier–Stokes flow systems in a reduced-order modeling framework based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition within a levelset geometry description and discretized by an unfitted mesh Finite Element Method. This work extends the approaches of [1], [2], [3] to nonlinear CutFEM discretization. We construct and investigate a unified and geometry independent reduced basis which overcomes many barriers and complications of the past, that may occur whenever geometrical morphings are taking place. By employing a geometry independent reduced basis, we are able to avoid remeshing and transformation to reference configurations, and we are able to handle complex geometries. This combination of a fixed background mesh in a fixed extended background geometry with reduced order techniques appears beneficial and advantageous in many industrial and engineering applications, which could not be resolved efficiently in the past.
A novel reduced order model (ROM) for incompressible flows is developed by performing a Galerkin projection based on a fully (space and time) discrete full order model (FOM) formulation. This ‘discretize‐then‐project’ approach requires no pressure stabilization technique (even though the pressure term is present in the ROM) nor a boundary control technique (to impose the boundary conditions at the ROM level). These are two main advantages compared to existing approaches. The fully discrete FOM is obtained by a finite volume discretization of the incompressible Navier‐Stokes equations on a collocated grid, with a forward Euler time discretization. Two variants of the time discretization method, the inconsistent and consistent flux method, have been investigated. The latter leads to divergence‐free velocity fields, also on the ROM level, whereas the velocity fields are only approximately divergence‐free in the former method. For both methods, accurate results have been obtained for test cases with different types of boundary conditions: a lid‐driven cavity and an open‐cavity (with an inlet and outlet). The ROM obtained with the consistent flux method, having divergence‐free velocity fields, is slightly more accurate but also slightly more expensive to solve compared to the inconsistent flux method. The speedup ratio of the ROM and FOM computation times is the highest for the open cavity test case with the inconsistent flux method.
Full-text available
A proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) of the flow in a square lid-driven cavity at Re=22,000 is computed to educe the coherent structures in this flow and to construct a low-dimensional model for driven cavity flows. Among all linear decompositions, the POD is the most efficient in the sense that it captures the largest possible amount of kinetic energy (for any given number of modes). The first 80 POD modes of the driven cavity flow are computed from 700 snapshots that are taken from a direct numerical simulation (DNS). The first 80 spatial POD modes capture (on average) 95% of the fluctuating kinetic energy. From the snapshots a motion picture of the coherent structures is made by projecting the Navier–Stokes equation on a space spanned by the first 80 spatial POD modes. We have evaluated how well the dynamics of this 80-dimensional model mimics the dynamics given by the Navier–Stokes equations. The results can be summarized as follows. A closure model is needed to integrate the 80-dimensional system at Re=22,000 over long times. With a simple closure the energy spectrum of the DNS is recovered. A linear stability analysis shows that the first (Hopf) bifurcation of the 80-dimensional dynamical system takes place at Re=7,819. This number lies about 0.7% above the critical Reynolds number given elsewhere and differs by about 2% from the first instability found with DNS. In addition to that, the unstable eigenvector displays the correct mechanism: a centrifugal instability of the primary eddy, however, the frequency of the periodic solution after the first bifurcation differs from that of the DNS. The stability of periodic solutions of the 80-dimensional system is analyzed by means of Floquet multipliers. For Re=11,188-11,500 the ratio of the two periods of the stable 2-periodic solution of the 80-dimensional system is approximately the same as the ratio of the two periods of the 2-periodic solution of the DNS at Re=11,000. For slightly higher Reynolds numbers both solutions lose one period. The periodic solutions of the dynamical system at Re=11,800 and the DNS at Re=12,000 have approximately the same period and have qualitatively the same behavior.
Full-text available
We present a new approach to simulating unsteady fluid flows, with only very few degrees of freedom, by employing directly eigenmodes extracted from digital particle image velocimetry experimental data. In particular, we formulate standard Galerkin and nonlinear Galerkin approximations of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations using hierarchical empirical eigenfunctions extracted from an ensemble of flow snapshots. We demonstrate that standard Galerkin approaches produce simulations capable of capturing the short-term dynamics of the flow, but nonlinear Galerkin projections are more effective in capturing both the short- and long-term dynamics, leading to bounded solutions. These findings are documented by applying these approaches to flow past a stationary circular cylinder at Reynolds number 610.
Full-text available
We present a new approach to simulating wave-structure interaction dynamics using proper orthogonal decomposition by directly employing eigenmodes extracted from particle image velocimetry experimental data. A low-dimensional Galerkin model is constructed incorporating up to 12 modes and time-dependent boundary conditions. A penalty method is introduced to deal effectively with such boundary conditions. Our results suggest that this model represents accurately the flow dynamics, and it is asymptotically stable without the use of any ad hoc dissipation or other stabilization schemes. Our findings are documented by applying this approach to studying the vorticity dynamics of wave-cylinder interactions at Keulegan-Carpenter numbers of 9.3 and 13.9.
Full-text available
The author considers ordinary and functional-differential equations with T-periodic right-hand side and looks at some conjectures on proving the existence of a periodic solution. One of the “best” conditions to obtain a periodic solution is the existence of a bounded solution, because it would be then not only a sufficient but also a necessary condition. The author goes one step in this direction to prove this conjecture.
Spectral methods involve seeking the solution to a differential equation in terms of a series of known, smooth functions. They have recently emerged as a viable alternative to finite difference and finite element methods for the numerical solution of partial differential equations. The key recent advance was the development of transform methods for the efficient implementation of spectral equations. Spectral methods have proved particularly useful in numerical fluid dynamics where large spectral hydrodynamics codes are now regularly used to study turbulence and transition, numerical weather prediction, and ocean dynamics. In this monograph, we discuss the formulation and analysis of spectral methods. It turns out that several features of this analysis involve interesting extensions of the classical numerical analysis of initial value problems. This monograph is based on part of a series of lectures presented by one of us (S.A.O.) at the NSF—CBMS Regional Conference held at Old Dominion University from August 2–6, 1976. This conference was supported by the National Science Foundation. We should like to thank our colleagues M. Deville, M. Dubiner, M. Gunzburger, B. Gustaffson, D. Haidvogel, M. Israeli, and J. Ortega for helpful discussions. We are grateful to E. Cohen, A. Patera, and K. Pitman for their assistance in preparing graphs and tables. Some calculations were performed at the Computing Facility of the National Center for Atmospheric Research which is supported by the National Science Foundation. One of us (D.G.) would like to acknowledge support by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration while in residence at ICASE, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia. Both authors would like to acknowledge support by the Fluid Dynamics Branch of the Office of Naval Research and the Atmospheric Sciences Section of the National Science Foundation. Hampton, Virginia, Cambridge, Massachusetts September 1977
In the following, the present authors comment on a paper by Zhou and Sirovich (ZS) [Phys. Fluids A 4, 2855 (1992)] which contained a critical appraisal of the models developed by Aubry et al. (AHLS) [J. Fluid Mech. 192, 115 (1988)]. It is found that ZS’s suggestion to use ‘‘a full channel interpretation of wall eigenfunctions,’’ thereby avoiding boundary terms, while attractive mathematically, is questionable in fluid mechanical terms. A major point of AHLS’s study was precisely to isolate the wall region and use the boundary terms to investigate the interaction with the outer flow. Also, it is demonstrated that certain instances of ‘‘irregular’’ bursting, as reported by ZS, are probably numerical effects.
Two-dimensional unsteady flows in complex geometries that are characterized by simple (low-dimensional) dynamical behavior are considered. Detailed spectral element simulations are performed, and the proper orthogonal decomposition is applied to the resulting data for two examples: the flow in a periodically grooved channel and the wake of an isolated circular cylinder. Low-dimensional dynamical models for these systems are obtained using the empirically derived global eigenfunctions in the spectrally discretized Navier-Stokes equations. The short- and long-term accuracy of the models is studied through simulation, continuation, and bifurcation analysis. Their ability to mimic the full simulations for Reynolds numbers beyond the values used for eigenfunction extraction is evaluated.
The paper considers the dynamics of coherent structures in the wall region of a turbulent channel flow. The Karhunen-Loeve eigenfunctions and Galerkin procedure are employed to derive the dynamical description. A well-posed Hermitian theory is developed and convergence questions do not arise. No exterior pressure is required by this theory. It is shown that the behavior of the resulting model equations include intermittency, quasi-periodic, and chaotic solutions. Three-dimensional effects are introduced into the dynamics in order to produce a physically more realistic dynamical theory. It is argued that the bursting and ejection events in turbulent boundary layers are explained more satisfactorily within this framework.