ArticlePDF Available

The biological importance of the Eastern Arc Mountain of Tanzania and Kenya

Authors:
  • UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre

Abstract and Figures

The Eastern Arc Mountains are renown in Africa for high concentrations of endemic species of animals and plants. Thirteen separate mountain blocks comprise the Eastern Arc, supporting around 3300 km2 of sub-montane, montane and upper montane forest, less than 30% of the estimated original forested area. At least 96 vertebrate species are endemic, split as follows: 10 mammal, 19 bird, 29 reptile and 38 amphibian species. This includes four endemic or nearly endemic species of primate – the Sanje Mangabey, the Iringa Red Colobus, the Mountain Galago and the new Kipunji monkey that forms its own monotypic genus. A further 71 vertebrate species are near-endemic. At least 800 vascular plant species are endemic, almost 10% of these being trees. These endemics include the majority of the species of African violet – Saintpaulia, a well-known flowering plant in Western households. An additional 32 species of bryophytes are also endemic. Many hundreds of invertebrates are also likely to be endemic, with data for butterflies, millipedes and dragonflies indicating potential trends in importance. Seventy-one of the endemic or near-endemic vertebrates are threatened by extinction (8 critical, 27 endangered, 36 vulnerable), with an additional seven wide ranging threatened species. Hundreds of plant species are also threatened. Most Eastern Arc endemics are closed-forest specialists and comprise taxa with an ancient history and those of more recent origin, including some possessing ancient affinities with taxa from West Africa, Madagascar, and even South America and Southeast Asia. Mountain block prioritisation for biodiversity conservation shows that Udzungwas, East Usambaras and Ulugurus are the most important blocks, with other important blocks being the Ngurus and West Usambaras. Rankings are correlated closely with the area of remaining forest. Most of the remaining forest is found within nearly 150 Government Forest Reserves, with 106 of these managed nationally for water catchment, biodiversity and soil conservation and where forest exploitation is not allowed. Outside these areas most forest has been cleared, except in small village burial/sacred sites, a few Village Forest Reserves, and inaccessible areas. In most Eastern Arc Mountains the local populations have not encroached beyond the reserve boundaries to develop farms, but forest resources within the boundaries are used for fuel and building materials and some forests are heavily degraded. Fire is also a problem as it enters and destroys forests during the dry seasons. The future of the biodiversity on the Eastern Arc Mountains is closely tied to management policies and capacity of the Tanzania Forestry and Beekeeping Division, Tanzania National Parks Authority, and Kenya Forest Department. Supporting these agencies in their mandated job is an essential conservation investment over the longer term.
Content may be subject to copyright.
The biological importance of the Eastern Arc Mountains
of Tanzania and Kenya
N.D. Burgess
a,b,c,
*, T.M. Butynski
d
, N.J. Cordeiro
e,f
, N.H. Doggart
g
, J. Fjeldsa
˚
h
, K.M. Howell
i
,
F.B. Kilahama
a
, S.P. Loader
k
, J.C. Lovett
l
, B. Mbilinyi
a
, M. Menegon
m
,D.C.Moyer
n
,
E. Nashanda
j
, A. Perkin
g
, F. Rovero
m
, W.T. Stanley
o
, S.N. Stuart
p
a
Conservation and Management of the Eastern Arc Mountain Forests (CMEAMF), Forestry and Beekeeping Division, P.O. Box 289,
Morogoro, Tanzania
b
WWF-USA Conservation Science Programme, 1250 24th St. NW, Washington, DC 20037-1193, USA
c
Conservation Biology Group, Zoology Department, Cambridge University, CB2 3EJ, UK
d
Eastern Africa Regional Program, Conservation International, c/o IUCN, P.O. Box 68200, Nairobi 00200, Kenya
e
Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 S Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA
f
Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, P.O. Box 661, Arusha, Tanzania
g
Tanzania Forest Conservation Group, P.O. Box 23410, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
h
Zoological Museum, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
i
Zoology Department, University of Dar es Salaam, P.O. Box 35064, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
j
Forestry and Beekeeping Division, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, P.O. Box 9372, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
k
Department of Zoology, the Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, SW7 5BD, UK
l
Environment Department, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
m
Sezione di Zoologia dei Vertebrati, Museo Tridentino di Scienze Naturali, Via Calepina 14, I-38100 Trento, Italy
n
Wildlife Conservation Society, P.O. Box 936, Iringa, Tanzania
o
Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 S Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA
p
CI/CABS – IUCN/SSC Biodiversity Assessment Initiative, c/o Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, 1919 M
Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036, USA
ARTICLE INFO
Article history:
Received 17 June 2005
Received in revised
form 29 June 2006
Accepted 8 August 2006
Available online 12 October 2006
Keywords:
Biodiversity conservation
Eastern Arc Mountains
Protected areas
Diversity
Endemism
ABSTRACT
The Eastern Arc Mountains are renown in Africa for high concentrations of endemic
species of animals and plants. Thirteen separate mountain blocks comprise the Eastern
Arc, supporting around 3300 km
2
of sub-montane, montane and upper montane forest, less
than 30% of the estimated original forested area. At least 96 vertebrate species are endemic,
split as follows: 10 mammal, 19 bird, 29 reptile and 38 amphibian species. This includes
four endemic or nearly endemic species of primate – the Sanje Mangabey, the Iringa Red
Colobus, the Mountain Galago and the new Kipunji monkey that forms its own monotypic
genus. A further 71 vertebrate species are near-endemic. At least 800 vascular plant species
are endemic, almost 10% of these being trees. These endemics include the majority of the
species of African violet – Saintpaulia, a well-known flowering plant in Western households.
An additional 32 species of bryophytes are also endemic. Many hundreds of invertebrates
are also likely to be endemic, with data for butterflies, millipedes and dragonflies indicating
potential trends in importance. Seventy-one of the endemic or near-endemic vertebrates
are threatened by extinction (8 critical, 27 endangered, 36 vulnerable), with an additional
seven wide ranging threatened species. Hundreds of plant species are also threatened.
0006-3207/$ - see front matter 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.08.015
*Corresponding author: Tel.: +44 1223 440155.
E-mail address: neil.burgess@wwfus.org (N.D. Burgess).
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231
available at www.sciencedirect.com
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon
Most Eastern Arc endemics are closed-forest specialists and comprise taxa with an ancient
history and those of more recent origin, including some possessing ancient affinities with
taxa from West Africa, Madagascar, and even South America and Southeast Asia. Mountain
block prioritisation for biodiversity conservation shows that Udzungwas, East Usambaras
and Ulugurus are the most important blocks, with other important blocks being the Ngurus
and West Usambaras. Rankings are correlated closely with the area of remaining forest.
Most of the remaining forest is found within nearly 150 Government Forest Reserves, with
106 of these managed nationally for water catchment, biodiversity and soil conservation
and where forest exploitation is not allowed. Outside these areas most forest has been
cleared, except in small village burial/sacred sites, a few Village Forest Reserves, and inac-
cessible areas. In most Eastern Arc Mountains the local populations have not encroached
beyond the reserve boundaries to develop farms, but forest resources within the bound-
aries are used for fuel and building materials and some forests are heavily degraded. Fire
is also a problem as it enters and destroys forests during the dry seasons. The future of
the biodiversity on the Eastern Arc Mountains is closely tied to management policies and
capacity of the Tanzania Forestry and Beekeeping Division, Tanzania National Parks
Authority, and Kenya Forest Department. Supporting these agencies in their mandated
job is an essential conservation investment over the longer term.
2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The phrase ‘Eastern Arc Mountains’, describing a chain of
mountains starting in southern Kenya and progressing
through eastern Tanzania, first appeared in print in 1985,
together with a map of the area (Lovett, 1985). In subsequent
years, biological data on the importance of the Eastern Arc
Mountains have been increasingly refined and summarised,
first by Lovett and Wasser (1993), and later by Burgess et al.
(1998a,b) and Newmark (2002). These and other data havebeen
used in several global analyses of biodiversity priority to show
that the Eastern Arc Mountains rank among the most impor-
tant areas of the world for the conservation of endemic birds
(ICBP, 1992; Stattersfield et al., 1998), endemic plants (Lovett,
1988; Myers, 1988, 1990; Lovett, 1998a; Mittermeier et al.,
1998; Myers et al., 2000; Lovett et al., 2004), and a combined
set of taxonomic groups (Olson and Dinerstein, 1998; Brooks
et al., 2001; Burgess et al., 2004b). The Eastern Arc is also home
to four endemic or near-endemic species of primates – the
Sanje Mangabey Cercocebus sanjei, Iringa Red Colobus Procolo-
bus gordonorum, the Mountain Galago Galagoides orinus and
the new Kipunji monkey Rungwecebus kipunji that is the sole
representative of its genus (Davenport et al., 2006) – and most
of the known species of African violet – Saintpaulia spp. At-
tempts to factor threat into assessments of conservation prior-
ity across the world and across Africa have also shown that the
Eastern Arc is amongst the most threatened regions of global
biodiversity significance and one where the extinction risk to
the fauna and flora is intense, and increasing (Balmford
et al., 2001a,b; Brooks et al., 2002; Burgess et al., 2004a,b).
A number of studies have also looked at patterns and pri-
orities among the 13 separate mountain blocks within the
Eastern Arc (Burgess et al., 1998b; Baker and Baker, 2002; CEPF,
2003), and some have looked at priorities within single blocks
(Rodgers and Homewood, 1982a,b; Johansson et al., 1998;
Dinesen et al., 2000). These studies concluded that some of
the blocks are more important than others, with the East
Usambaras, Ulugurus and Udzungwas consistently being as-
sessed as the most important areas. More recent studies have
shown how the prioritisation can be altered by undertaking
new fieldwork in poorly known blocks, and also that the over-
all ranking of the 13 blocks is correlated with both the forest
area remaining and the degree of study effort (Doggart
et al., 2006).
The primary aim of this paper is to analyse the biological
importance of the Eastern Arc Mountains vertebrate fauna,
as indicated by the number of endemic and near-endemic en-
demic species in the various mountain blocks. We use both
data published in the peer-reviewed literature and that from
unpublished sources provided by taxonomic experts. A sec-
ond aim is to assess the importance of different blocks for
vertebrate species regarded as threatened with extinction
(http://www.redlist.org), with lower significance given to this
attribute because the Red List assessment process has not
been completed for reptiles. A third aim is to compile and
present data on other less well known groups to see whether
they share similar patterns of importance. This is done for
trees, and for some invertebrate groups – butterflies, milli-
pedes, spiders and dragonflies. Prioritisation among the dif-
ferent Eastern Arc Mountain blocks is also examined against
one potential explanatory variable – the area of remaining for-
est. Discussion focuses on hypotheses developed to explain
the exceptional biodiversity of these mountains – which re-
volve around the likely persistence of forest cover over mil-
lions of years and the relative importance of ancient relict
endemics and recently evolved endemics within the Eastern
Arc Mountains.
2. Study area
2.1. Definition of the Eastern Arc mountains
The Eastern Arc is defined as a chain of ancient crystalline
Precambrian basement mountains, stretching from the Taita
210 BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231
Hills in Kenya to the Udzungwa Mountains in south-central
Tanzania, which were uplifted at least 30 million years ago
and which are under the direct climatic influence of the
Indian Ocean (Lovett, 1990; Lovett et al., 2004). The Eastern
Arc is also defined to end at the Makambako Gap – a non-
forest region of dry habitat – at the south-western end of
the Udzungwa Mountain range. Forested mountains with a
similar geology are found further south-west of the
Makambako Gap. These ‘Southern Rift’ forests differ from
those of the Eastern Arc because they are not directly under
the Indian Ocean climatic regime and are subject to more
variable convectional rainfall patterns. They also contain
higher percentages of grassland habitat, and while a few
representatives of the flora and fauna are shared with the
Eastern Arc, the ‘Southern Rift’’ forests have much lower
rates of endemism in all taxonomic groups (Lovett, 1993;
Burgess et al., 2004a,b).
Following from the above definition, there are 13 separate
mountain blocks in the Eastern Arc. These are from north to
south: Taita (including Kasigau; in Kenya), North Pare, South
Pare, West Usambara, East Usambara, Nguu, Nguru, Uluguru,
Ukaguru, Rubeho, Malundwe, Udzungwa, Mahenge (in Tanza-
nia) (Fig. 1;Table 1).
2.2. Forest categorisation
The Eastern Arc Mountains range up to 2635 m in altitude
(Lukwangule Plateau and Kimhandu Peak in the Ulugurus)
and contain a diverse assemblage of habitats. It is expected
that prior to major human influence on the landscape, the
wetter (eastern and south-eastern) slopes supported a contin-
uous forest cover throughout all elevations, while the drier
(western and north-western) slopes supported deciduous
woodland at lower elevations and evergreen forest only at
higher elevations. Tall evergreen forest was found on the
top plateaus well away from the rain-capturing scarps, as a
consequence of persistent fog over the highlands during the
night. In other parts of the highlands, montane grassland
and heathland dominated. A desiccation-adapted flora
occurred on rocky outcrops.
On the Uluguru Mountains, the forest formations have
been divided into upper montane (1800–2635 m), montane
(1250–1800 m) and sub-montane (800–1250 m) forest zones
(e.g. Po
´cs, 1976). Elsewhere the same zones are recognised
(Lovett, 1993), but their boundaries occur at somewhat differ-
ent altitudes – depending on inclination of the terrain, rain-
fall, distance from the coast, height of the mountains,
Fig. 1 – Map showing the 13 blocks of the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania and Kenya.
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231 211
incidence of cloud cover, etc. For example, the forest zone
divisions are at lower elevations in the cloudy and maritime
East Usambara Mountains (Moreau, 1966), whereas they are
much higher in inland rain-shadow areas, where evergreen
forest is limited to top plateaus (>2000 m). At lower elevations
(regarded by Po
´cs, 1976 as below 800 m on the Ulugurus, but
below 500 m elsewhere) the sub-montane forest grades
in species composition and physiognomy into that of the
Table 1 – Location, area (km
2
) and altitudinal range of forested habitats in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Kenya and
Tanzania
Sites Coordinates
(degree and
minutes)
Forest area
(km
2
)
according
to
Newmark
(2002)
Forest area
(km
2
) according
to various
other
published
sources
(see notes)
Forest area
(km
2
) according
to standardised
analysis of
satellite
imagery
s
Date and
type of
satellite
imagery
used
s
Date
order
for images
follows day,
month, year
Size of
the block
(km
2
)
Altitudinal
range of
forest (m)
Taita Hills 0325S 3820E 6 3
a,m,r
3
*
Not available Not
available
1500–2140
North Pare 0335–0346S 3733–3740E 151 25
b,c
27 25.10.1999;
Landsat TM
453.58 1300–2113
South Pare 0404–0434S 3745–3801E 333 211.1
b
138 25.10.1999;
Landsat TM
1577.73 820–2463
West Usambara 0420–0507S 3806–3841E 547 220
d
319 25.10.1999;
Landsat TM
2506.65 1200–2200
East Usambara 0445–0520S 3826–3848E 413 450
d,e,i
263 17.01.2000;
Spot XS
1082.00 130–1506
Nguu 0527–0538S 3736–3732E Included in
Nguru
140.42
j
188 17.8.2003;
Landsat TM+
1591.00 1000–1550
Nguru 0527–0613S 3726–3737E 647 328.35
b
297 07.06.2002;
Spot XS
1672.90 400–2000
Uluguru 0651–0712S 3736–3745E 528 230
b,h,p
278
**
22.02.2000;
Spot XS
1477.50 300–2400
Ukaguru 0619–0635S 3653–3703E 184 155.38
b,k
172 07.07.2000;
Landsat TM
1258.80 1500–2250
Rubeho 0648–0722S 3634–3658E 499 654
g,o
464 07.07.2000;
Landsat TM
4636.40 520–2050
Malundwe Hill 0724S 3718E 6 4.5
l
13 07.07.2000;
Landsat TM
1661.50 1200–1275
Mahenge 0837–0838S 3642–3644E 291 5
b,q
19 25.10.1999;
Landsat TM+
2802.29 460–1040
Udzungwa 0722–0843S 3507–3658E 2103 1017
b,f,n
1353 01.11.1999,
11.10.2003; TM+
16,131.40 300–2580
Total 5708 3443 3534
a Waiyaki, unpublished (ground survey).
bLovett and Po
´cs (1993) (ground survey).
cCordeiro and Kiure (1995) (ground survey).
dIversen (1991) (aerial photos).
eEvans (1997) (ground survey).
fMoyer (1992) (remote sensing).
gFjeldsa
˚et al. (1997a,b) (ground survey).
hSvendsen and Hansen (1995) (ground survey).
iJohansson and Sandy (1996) (satellite images and aerial photos).
jSeddon et al. (1995) (ground survey).
kEvans and Anderson (1993) (ground survey).
lLovett and Norton (1989) (ground survey).
mTetlow (1987) (ground survey).
nLovett et al. (2001) (ground survey).
oDoggart et al. (2006) (ground survey).
p Burgess et al. (2002b) (aerial photos and ground survey)
qFrontier-Tanzania (2001–2004) (ground survey).
rLens et al. (2002) (satellite images and ground survey).
sMbilinyi and Kashaigili (2005) (satellite images and ground truthing).
* Not included in the study by Mbilinyi and Kashaigili (2005) and hence the figure from the previous column was used.
** Including outlying hills such as Mindu, Nguru ya Ndege, Mkungwe, Dindili and Kitulang’halo.
212 BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231
‘transitional’ rainforests. Transitional forests are often
grouped within the lowland Coastal Forests found along the
eastern littoral plain of Africa from Somalia in the north to
Mozambique in the south (White, 1983; Burgess and Clarke,
2000). In reality, no hard boundary exists between these two
forest types (Lovett et al., 2001) and in some mountain blocks
there is a continuum between the Eastern Arc and Coastal
Forest types (e.g. East Usambara, Uluguru, Udzungwa).
2.3. Reserved areas
Two National Parks support Eastern Arc habitats in Tanzania.
The first is the Udzungwa Mountains National Park
(1900 km
2
) which contains large areas of mountain forest
and grassland; the second is Mikumi National Park
(1450 km
2
) that includes a small area (4 km
2
) of montane for-
est on Malundwe Hill. Both parks have the internationally
agreed protected area code IUCN II and are managed by
the Tanzania National Parks Authority (TANAPA). Three
other areas of the Eastern Arc are gazetted as Nature Re-
serves, but not given IUCN protected area codes. The first
of these is the recently declared (1997) Amani Nature Re-
serve (83 km
2
) managed by the Forestry and Beekeeping Divi-
sion (FBD) in the East Usambara Mountains, and the second
and third are private Nature Reserves, the first within the
Mufindi Tea Estate in the Udzungwa Mountains (Lovett and
Moyer, 1992) and the second at Mazumbai in the West
Usambara Mountains (Redhead, 1981).
The majority of the rest of the Eastern Arc forest in Tanza-
nia is found within various different categories of Forest Re-
serve. These are managed under two separate administrative
structures and are not assigned any IUCN protected area
codes. The Tanzania Forestry and Beekeeping Division man-
ages the majority of the larger Forest Reserves for water catch-
ment and biodiversity conservation. These 104 ‘national’
Forest Reserves cover 4718 km
2
and support a mosaic of forest,
grasslands, and other habitat types (Burgess and Kilahama,
2005). A further 32 Local Authority Forest Reserves (138 km
2
)
are managed by the Districts, and approximately six Village
Forest Reserves (25 km
2
) are managed by villages. In addition
there are seven proposed Forest Reserves (611 km
2
), and 14
proposed village FRs (22 km
2
) that are not legally gazetted. Pri-
vately managed forests cover around 177 km
2
and are found at
Mazumbai (owned by Sokoine University), and within the tea
estates of Ambangulu in the West Usambaras, Mufindi in the
Udzungwa Mountains and Amani/Kwamkoro in the East
Usambaras (Tab le 2). Within the human-dominated landscape
outside the Reserves and private estates smaller patches of
forest remain under traditional village authority. Almost every
village has a forest patch for rituals and as a burial grove for its
people, but these are generally under 1 km
2
in area and the
total area is probably under 100 km
2
(e.g. Mwihomeke et al.,
1998; Ylha
¨isi, 2004).
3. Methods
3.1. Remaining habitat
The forest cover data presented are derived from Mbilinyi
and Kashaigili (2005), a study undertaken at the Sokoine
Table 2 – Protected areas (National Parks), other reserves (Forest Reserves) and areas of private forest found within the 14
districts of the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania, and number of forestry staff available for management (as of 2004)
District National
Parks
(name)
National
FR (n)
National
FR area
(km
2
)
Local
authority
FR (n)
Local
authority
FR (km
2
)
Village
Forest
Reserve (n)
Village
Forest
Reserve (km
2
)
Private
forests (km
2
)
Number of
foresters
Mpwapwa 4 154.6 0 0 0 0 0 5
Kilolo Part of
Udzungwa
Mountains NP
7 (plus 1
proposed)
805.5 0 0 0 0 0 66
Mufindi 6 218.1 15 15.5 2 2.8 134.5 28
Same 2 197.5 7 (plus 2
proposed)
74.2 3 (proposed) Unknown 0 27
Mwanga 3 (plus 3
proposed)
74.1 0 0 0 0 0 14
Kilindi 11 303.4 0 0 0 0 0 12
Lushoto 16 340.1 7 13.6 11 (proposed) 22.1 5 36
Korogwe 8 110.5 0 0 0 0 35.2 26
Muheza 11 (plus 1
NR and 1
proposed FR)
315.9 0 0 4 9.9 2.1 25
Kilombero Part of
Udzungwa
Mountains NP
4 673.4 1 34.7 0 0 0 29
Kilosa Part of
Mikumi NP
8 801.5 0 0 0 0 0 29
Morogoro 8 356.3 2 0.2 0 0 0 42
Mvomero Part of
Mikumi NP
9 317.9 0 0 0 0 0 7
Ulanga 7 49.6 0 0 0 0 0 18
Notes: FR = Forest Reserve; NR = Nature Reserve; NP = National Park.
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231 213
University of Agriculture Remote Sensing and GIS labora-
tory (Morogoro, Tanzania) with technical backing from the
Centre for Applied Biodiversity Science at Conservation
International (Washington, DC, USA) and National Aeronau-
tics and Space Administration (NASA). The methodology to
calculate the forest area in the Eastern Arc is outlined
below:
The satellite images used to assess forest cover were se-
lected from a large number of potential images taken during
the dry season (June–November) and yielding minimum
cloud cover (Table 1). Such images maximise the chances
to resolve differences between evergreen forest habitat and
deciduous (in the dry season) woodland habitat. The best
images were first combined into a composite image covering
the Eastern Arc Mountains. Combination involved image rec-
tification undertaken using second order polynomial trans-
formation and nearest-neighbourhood interpolation.
Maximum likelihood classifier (MLC) remote sensing classifi-
cation methodologies were then utilised to develop the ini-
tial map of different vegetation types in the Eastern Arc.
The supervised classification process involved selecting
training sites on the image which represent known land
classes. Training was an iterative process, whereby the se-
lected training pixels were evaluated by performing an esti-
mated classification (ALARM command). These ALARM
results were evaluated and training samples were refined
sequentially. The results of initial field verification were also
included at this stage. In order to reinforce the visual inter-
pretability of images, a colour composite (Landsat TM bands
4 5 3) was prepared and its contrast was stretched using a
Gaussian distribution function. Furthermore, a 3 ·3 high
pass filter was applied to the colour composite to further en-
hance linear features, e.g. rivers, and patterns such as culti-
vation. All image processing was carried out using ERDAS
Imagine software.
The resulting map was checked for errors. Examples of
typical errors are cloud edges being confused with non-for-
ested areas, water being confused with cloud shadows, etc.
At this stage additional sub-classes were added to the set of
training data or old, problematic sub-classes were modified.
After this a new MLC was run and the process was repeated
over several iterations until the map had sufficiently low er-
ror. Classified images were then recoded to respective classes
i.e. forest, woodland, plantation, etc.
Verification of results was undertaken in two ways, at dif-
ferent times in the process. Firstly, field surveys were under-
taken during 2005 in the following Mountain blocks;
Uluguru, Ukaguru, Rubeho, Mahenge, Image and Udzungwa.
This gathered field data to help with the initial classification
process. Second, draft output maps were sent to nine experts
familiar with different Mountain Blocks and their comments
were used to further refine the classification of the habitat
types – especially the differentiation of closed forests and
woodlands.
3.2. Vertebrates
Data on the vertebrate fauna of the Eastern Arc Mountains are
based on the approach presented in Burgess et al. (1998a,b).In
this scheme, endemic vertebrates are those confined to the
Eastern Arc Mountains as defined here and in the African-
wide assessment of ‘ecoregions’ by the World Wildlife Fund
(USA) (Burgess et al., 2004b, 2006). Near-endemic vertebrates
are found in the Eastern Arc ecoregion (ecoregion 19 of Bur-
gess et al., 2004b), but also occur in one or more of the follow-
ing WWF ecoregions – Northern Inhambane–Zanzibar Coastal
Forest Mosaic (ecoregion 20), Southern Rift Montane Forest–
Grassland Mosaic (ecoregion 74) and/or the East African Mon-
tane Forests (ecoregion 18).
For this paper we have significantly updated the biological
data in Burgess et al. (1998a,b) with the assistance of key tax-
onomic specialists. For mammals we added all recently de-
scribed species and new distributional records from
published papers: shrews (Stanley et al., 1998a,b; Stanley
and Hutterer, 2000; Stanley et al., 2005a; Stanley and Olson,
2005), rodents (Stanley et al., 1996, 1998a,b); galagos (Honess
and Bearder, 1996; Bearder et al., 2003; Grubb et al., 2003; Per-
kin et al., 2003), monkeys (Jones et al., 2005); duikers (Rovero
et al., 2005); Rubeho Mountains (Doggart et al., 2006); Mal-
undwe Mountain (Stanley et al., 2005b); Mahenge Mountains
(Frontier-Tanzania, 2001–2004); Uluguru Mountains (Doggart
et al., 2005); Udzungwa Mountains (Frontier Tanzania, 2001);
East Usambara Mountains (Johansson et al., 1998; Frontier
Tanzania, 1999–2002), South Pare Mountains (Stanley et al.,
1996, 1998b). Additional distribution data covering several
large mammals was taken from Cordeiro et al. (2005),Grim-
shaw et al. (1995) and unpublished data from the authors.
For birds we added data for several newly described species
(see Annex 1) and mountain blocks according to the following
sources: Uluguru Mountains (Doggart et al., 2005); Rubeho
Mountains (Doggart et al., 2006); Nguu Mountains (Seddon
et al., 1999a,b); Taita Hills (Brooks et al., 1998; Lens et al.,
2002); Udzungwa Mountains (Fjeldsa
˚, 1999; Butynski and
Ehardt, 2003); Mahenge Mountains (Frontier-Tanzania, 2001–
2004); South Pare Mountains (Baker, 2001); Nguru Mountains
(Romdal, 2001a), West Usambara Mountains (Lovett and
Stuart, 2001); East Usambara Mountains (Cordeiro, 1998;
Seddon et al., 1999a,b). Unpublished data was also provided
by the authors. For amphibians we used the same procedure
of adding recently described species (see Annex 1) and new
distributional data as follows: Uluguru Mountains (Doggart
et al., 2005); Rubeho Mountains (Doggart et al., 2006); Nguu
Mountains (Menegon et al., 2003); Mahenge Mountains (Loader
et al., 2003); Udzungwa Mountains (Poynton, 1998; Poynton
et al., 1998; Menegon and Salvidio, 2005); and unpublished data
from the authors. The reptile data are significantly updated
from that in Howell (1993) using Spawls et al. (2001), and more
recently described species (see Annex 1) and new distribu-
tional data as follows: Nguru Mountains; Nguu Mountains
(Menegon et al., 2003); Uluguru Mountains (Doggart et al.,
2005) and unpublished data from the authors. The compiled
data on vertebrate animals in each Eastern Arc mountain
block and nearby forest ecoregions (Annex 1) was used for
various analyses, as described below.
We have excluded from our database vertebrate species
that have an exclusively lowland forest distribution, even if
they are found geographically adjacent to the E
´astern Arc
Mountain forests. These species are as follows: one bird (Otus
ireneae), two mammals (Kerivoula africana and Galagoides
cocos), four amphibians (Mertensophryne micranotis;Afrixalus
214 BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231
sylvaticus,Hyperolius rubrovermiculatus and Stephopaedes
usambarae), and two reptiles (Lygodactylus williamsi and Pros-
ymna semifasciata).
3.3. Trees
A list of Eastern Arc endemic large trees and their distribution
was compiled using references cited in Lovett (1998a) supple-
mented by more recent field observations by Jon Lovett (An-
nex 2). A large tree was defined as greater than 10 m tall
and/or 20 cm diameter at breast height. The definition of
near-endemic tree species followed the same methodology
as for vertebrates (see above). Species with disjunct distribu-
tions distant from the Eastern Arc are not included. Species
lists for the Taita Hills, Usambara Mountains, Uluguru Moun-
tains and Udzungwa Mountains are more complete than
other mountain blocks due to greater research activity.
Although not used for analysis we also reviewed information
on endemic bryophyte species (Po
´cs, 1998).
3.4. Analysis of biodiversity priority
Two kinds of ranking methods were used to assess the prior-
ity of the different component blocks of the Eastern Arc
Mountains. The first method uses the summed numbers of
strictly endemic and/or near-endemic vertebrates and tree
species for each of the 13 Eastern Arc Mountain blocks. The
second method corrects the species data for the effects of for-
est area and thus aims to reduce the potential bias in the pri-
oritization approach – where larger forests contain more
species simply due to the species–area relationship (Rosen-
zweig, 1995).
Area correction was performed using the equation:
SA ¼S=Az
where zis the species–area exponent, Sis the number of spe-
cies, Ais area (km
2
) and SA is the number of species corrected
for area. We set z= 0.2 as this corresponds to empirical results
for a wide variety of taxa and locations in mainland terrestrial
ecosystems (Rosenzweig, 1995).
3.5. Correlation between biological importance and forest
area
Across the Eastern Arc Mountains there is great variation in
the area of forest remaining in different mountains. We used
Spearman Rank Correlations to examine whether the biolog-
ical importance of each Eastern Arc Mountain block for ende-
mic vertebrates and trees (uncorrected for area) is explained
by the area of remaining forest habitat.
4. Results
4.1. Forest area assessment
Our analysis of remote sensing imagery indicates that around
3534 km
2
of forest was found in the Eastern Arc Mountains in
the late 1990s/early 2000s. This is a similar estimate to that of
3443 km
2
derived by Burgess et al. (1998a,b) using estimates
from a variety of published papers (see Tabl e 1). It is less than
the estimate of 5708 km
2
for ‘natural forest’ derived from a
landcover map of Tanzania produced using 1995 remote sens-
ing images processed by Hunting Technical Services of the UK
(Newmark, 1998; updated by Newmark, 2002)(Table 1). We use
the estimate of 3534 km
2
of forest for all further analysis in
this paper. The methods used do not allow us to assess the
quality of that forest, but clearly distinguish natural forest
from woodland and tree plantations.
4.2. Eastern Arc endemic species
4.2.1. Vertebrates
Ninety-six species of vertebrates are endemic to the Eastern
Arc Mountains (Annex 1). Of these, 73 (76%) are dense forest
specialists and only two (2%) occupy non-forest habitats.
Most of the endemic species are sedentary within the Eastern
Arc forests, with only a few of the bird species undertaking
seasonal migrations as temperatures fall in these mountains
during the austral winter months (July–September) (Burgess
and Mlingwa, 2000; Romdal, 2001b).
A further 71 species of vertebrate are near-endemic to the
Eastern Arc Mountains. Of these, 28 are also found in the
lowland Coastal Forests, 46 also range south into the South-
ern Rift, and 10 are also found on the younger volcanic high-
lands of northern Tanzania and/or Kenya (some occur in
more than one of these three broader regions). The majority
of these species are also forest-dependent (45 species; 63%),
but some (6 species; 8.5%) occupy non-forest habitats. A few
of the near-endemic species also migrate out of the Eastern
Arc Mountains, for example the Blue Swallow Hirundo
atrocaerulea.
4.2.2. Trees
A total of 68 endemic or near-endemic trees are recorded for
the Eastern Arc. These tree species occur throughout the ele-
vation and moisture range of the forests, but higher numbers
are found in wetter forests. Many of the lowland forest spe-
cies of the Eastern Arc also occur in coastal forests to the east
(Lovett, 1998b).
4.3. Threatened species in the Eastern Arc mountains
4.3.1. Vertebrates
Most of the birds, mammals and amphibians of the Eastern
Arc have been assessed against the IUCN Red List criteria –
quantifying their degree of threat (http://www.redlist.org,
November 2005). Seventy-one of the Eastern Arc endemic or
near-endemic vertebrates are threatened by extinction (8 crit-
ical, 27 endangered, 36 vulnerable (and 8 data deficient and
two near-threatened)) with seven other more wide ranging
threatened species. Some of the newly described species (par-
ticularly of birds and mammals) are not yet included on the
Red List because they have not been assessed. These omis-
sions include three newly described species of mammal (Con-
gosorex phillipsorum,Hylomyscus arcimontensis and R. kipunji,
the latter being an unusual new monotypic genus: Davenport
et al., 2006), species of Nectarinia sunbirds (Bowie et al., 2004)
and Turdus thrushes (Bowie et al., 2005), and an akalat – Shep-
pardia aurantiithorax (Beresford et al., 2004). Most reptiles have
also not been assessed against Red List criteria and many
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231 215
would be expected to qualify given their small ranges and the
extensive collection of some (e.g. chameleons) for the pet
trade.
4.3.2. Trees
The Red List of threatened tree species for the Eastern Arc
Mountains was reviewed in 2003 and was regarded as too
incomplete to be used for analysis (CEPF, 2003; Gereau and
Luke, 2003). Due to this shortcoming we did not attempt an
analysis of threatened tree species among the various Eastern
Arc Mountain blocks. However, we know that many of the
Eastern Arc endemic tree species are threatened and some
may have already become extinct – for example the tree Platy-
pterocarpus tanganyikensis (a monotypic genus) was only
known from an area of forest in the West Usambara Moun-
tains that was cleared shortly after Tanzania’s independence
in 1963. This tree species has not been relocated since (Lovett
and Stuart, 2001).
4.4. Biodiversity priorities
4.4.1. Vertebrates
The Udzungwa Mountains have the largest number of single-
block endemic (found in no other forest blocks) vertebrate
species (17 species), followed by the Uluguru (13 species),
the Taita Hills (6 species), the West Usambara (5 species)
and the East Usambara (4 species) (Fig. 2a). All other blocks
have two or less single block endemic species, and four blocks
have none at all. When corrected for area, the Uluguru Moun-
tains and the Taita Hills rise marginally above the Udzungwas
in terms of single-block endemic vertebrates per unit area of
forest habitat remaining (Fig. 2a).
In terms of Eastern Arc endemic vertebrate species, the
Uluguru Mountains have the largest number of vertebrate
species (44 species), followed by the Udzungwa (41 species),
the East Usambara (35 species), the West Usambara (22 spe-
cies), the Nguru (20 species) and the Rubeho (12 species)
(Fig. 2b). All other sites have 10 or fewer Eastern Arc endemic
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Taita
North Pare
South Pare
WestUsambara
EastUsambara
Taita
North Pare
South Pare
WestUsambara
EastUsambara
Nguu
Nguru
Uluguru
Ukaguru
Rubeho
Malundwe
Mahenge
Udzungwa
Nguu
Nguru
Uluguru
Ukaguru
Rubeho
Malundwe
Mahenge
Udzungwa
Taita
North Pare
South Pare
WestUsambara
EastUsambara
Nguu
Nguru
Uluguru
Ukaguru
Rubeho
Malundwe
Mahenge
Udzungwa
Taita
North Pare
South Pare
WestUsambara
EastUsambara
Nguu
Nguru
Uluguru
Ukaguru
Rubeho
Malundwe
Mahenge
Udzungwa
Taita
North Pare
South Pare
WestUsambara
EastUsambara
Nguu
Nguru
Uluguru
Ukaguru
Rubeho
Malundwe
Mahenge
Udzungwa
Taita
North Pare
South Pare
WestUsambara
EastUsambara
Nguu
Nguru
Uluguru
Ukaguru
Rubeho
Malundwe
Mahenge
Udzungwa
Number of single block endemics
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Single block endemics per sq km
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Numberof endemic species
Numberof near-endemic species
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Endemic species per sq km
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Number of endemic and near-
endemic species
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Endemic and near-endemic
species per sq km
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-1
4
9
14
19
24
Near-endemic species per sq km
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Number of threatened species
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Threatened species per sq km
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Numberof endemic and near-endemic
trees
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Endemic and near-endemictrees per sq
km
Fig. 2 – Ranked importance for vertebrates and large trees of the 13 mountain blocks of the Eastern Arc Mountains (grey
bars = uncorrected species data; black lines and diamonds = species data corrected for forest area). (a) Single block endemic
vertebrate species; (b) Eastern Arc endemic vertebrate species; (c) Endemic and near-endemic vertebrate species; (d) Near-
endemic vertebrate species; (e) Threatened vertebrate species; (f) Numbers of endemic and near-endemic tree species.
Mountain blocks are arranged left to right from north to south in the Eastern Arc.
216 BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231
vertebrate species, with the North and South Pare Mountains
and Mahenge Mountains being particularly impoverished.
When corrected for variations in forest area, the Uluguru
Mountains become of the highest importance for the conser-
vation of Eastern Arc endemic vertebrate species (Fig. 2b).
When endemic and near-endemic vertebrates are com-
bined, the Udzungwa Mountains have the largest number of
vertebrate species (96 species), followed by the Uluguru (81
species), the East Usambara (77 species), the Nguru (52 spe-
cies), the West Usambara(48 species), the Rubeho (35 species),
the Ukaguru and Nguu (27 species) (Fig. 2c). Of lowest impor-
tance on this scale is Malundwe Mountain with two Eastern
Arc endemic or near-endemic species (but virtually no
research has been done there). When adjusted for differences
in forest area, the Uluguru and East Usambara Mountains are
the most important sites for endemic and near-endemic spe-
cies (Fig. 2c). Similar patterns are seen with near-endemic
species (Fig. 2d).
Finally, when the number of Threatened species is used as
the measure of importance, the following priorities are
obtained: Most important is the Udzungwa Mountains (40
species), followed by the Uluguru (29 species) and East Usam-
bara (28 species), and West Usambara (21 species) (Fig. 2e).
When adjusted for variations in forest area, the order of
importance of these mountains remains the same (Fig. 2e).
4.4.2. Trees
The number of endemic and near endemic trees varies con-
siderably among blocks across the Eastern Arc Mountains
(Fig. 2f). The highest number of Eastern Arc endemic/near
endemic trees are found in the East Usambara (40 species),
Udzungwa (37 species), West Usambara (27 species) and
Uluguru (26 species) Mountains (Fig. 2f; Annex 2), which
are all well studied blocks. This ranking changes a little
when the number of endemic and near-endemic trees is cor-
rected for the remaining area of forest in these blocks
(Fig. 2f). Under this analysis the most important forests are
those of the East Usambara Mountains, followed by the West
Usambara, the Udzungwa, the Uluguru and the Nguru
Mountains. The small forests of the Taita Hills are also
important in terms of numbers of species in a very small
area of forest, as are those of Mahenge. The other mountain
blocks are all poorly known, and none are known to contain
more than six endemic or near-endemic trees, with Rubeho
and North Pare having no known endemics. It is likely that
the number of endemic trees in the Nguu, Ukaguru, Rubeho,
North Pare and Mahenge Mountains will increase as botani-
cal exploration continues.
4.5. Relationship between vertebrate species importance
and forest area
There is a high correlation between the vertebrate importance
of an Eastern Arc Mountain block and the area of forest
remaining. Positive correlations are found between forest
area and (1) numbers of endemic plus near-endemic species
(Spearman rank correlation coefficient r
s
= 0.862; P< 0.0001),
(2) numbers of Eastern Arc endemic species (Spearman
r
s
= 0.831; P< 0.0001), and (3) numbers of Red List species
(Spearman r
s
= 0.815; P< 0.001). The Red List correlation is
easily explained as a small geographical range is one of the
criteria within the red listing process.
5. Discussion
This paper demonstrates that the Eastern Arc Mountains are
of exceptional importance for endemic species of vertebrates
and trees in Africa. It also shows how the mountain blocks
within the Eastern Arc attain different importance scores
for the conservation of species vertebrates and trees. The
Uluguru Mountains, East Usambara Mountains and Udzung-
wa Mountains consistently emerge as the most important
blocks for vertebrates and trees, whereas the Nguru and West
Usambara Mountains also figure as important for tree spe-
cies. The prioritisation results are correlated strongly with
the area of remaining forest.
In the following sections we discuss whether (1) the high
rates of endemism seen in vertebrates and trees are also
found in other taxonomic groups, (2) outline some of the
hypotheses put forth to explain why there is so much ende-
mism in the Eastern Arc, and (3) present some suggestions
on where survey effort needs to be focussed in the future to
obtain a better picture of the patterns of endemism in the
Eastern Arc. Finally, we present the conservation challenges
facing the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania and the work
that is ongoing to try and ensure the long term conservation
of the natural habitats of the Eastern Arc – and hence the sur-
vival of the endemic species that rely on them.
5.1. Additional endemic vertebrates and plants
We still do not have a complete inventory of the endemic spe-
cies of vertebrates and plants in the Eastern Arc Mountains.
New species (and genera) are still regularly being discovered.
Within the plants this includes new genera like Kihansia
(Cheek, 2004), and new species in well-known groups such
as coffee (Davis and Mvungi, 2004). More than 15 new verte-
brate species are also in the process of scientific description,
including: one Bradypodion and one Urocotyledon from Ma-
henge, two new Nectophrynoides and one Probreviceps from
Ukaguru (one of the Nectophrynoides from Ukaguru has re-
cently been named as N. laticeps Channing et al., 2005), three
new Nectophrynoides from Uluguru, two Nectophrynoides, three
Callulina, one Arthroleptis and one Probreviceps from Nguru,
and one Afrixalus and one Arthroleptis from Udzungwa.
Detailed DNA and morphological analysis of existing spe-
cies also seems likely to further increase the number of taxa
within these mountains. As examples, molecular (and mor-
phological) variation in bird species distributed across a num-
ber of mountain blocks indicates that they should be split into
allo- or parapatric component species; namely Artisornis met-
opias,Batis mixta (with populations from Ukaguru and Ulug-
uru towards the south west representing an unnamed
species), Modulatrix stictigula,Illadopsis rufipennis and Stactola-
ema olivacea. And finally in the mammals, there is a distinctive
sub-species of the genet Genetta servalina lowei that is confined
to the Udzungwa Mountains (De Luca and Mpunga, 2002),
Kanga Forest Reserve in the Nguru Mountains and Uluguru
North in the Uluguru Mountains (F. Rovero, unpublished). This
may also, with further work, turn out to be a full species.
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231 217
5.2. Endemism in other taxonomic groups
5.2.1. Invertebrates
The invertebrate fauna of the Eastern Arc is more poorly
known than the vertebrate fauna. However, the available
information suggests that many species of invertebrate are
confined to a single Eastern Arc Mountain block. For example,
Scharff (1992) shows that single site endemism for linyphiid
spiders is over 80%. Moreover, for carabid beetles the Uluguru
Mountains have 95% endemism (Basilewsky, 1962, 1976), and
for harvestmen arachnids this site has 88% endemism
(Scharff et al., 1981). Some of the patterns known for individ-
ual invertebrate groups are outlined below.
5.2.2. Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies)
Three odonate species are endemic to the Eastern Arc (Platycy-
pha auripes,Amanipodagrion gilliesi and Micromacromia miraculosa
– the last two are East Usambara endemics). Two near-endemic
species found in the Eastern Arc are Umma declivium (Eastern
Arc and north Malawi) and Chlorocnemis abbotti (Eastern Arc
and Kilimanjaro) (Clausnitzer, 2001). Some of these represent
genera that are more widespread in the Central and West Afri-
can forests. The endemic Eastern Arc Odonata species are
found in forest habitats and breed in montane streams, or in
small waterfilled holes in tree-trunks. Three coastal forest
endemics that may perhaps range into the lowlands of the East-
ern Arc are Coryphagrion grandis (Gondwana relict with nearest
relatives in Central and South America), Hadrothemis scabrifrons
(relict form also found in coastal Gabon and Cameroon), and
Thermochoria jeanneli (coastal swamp forest) (Clausnitzer, 2001).
5.2.3. Lepidoptera (Butterflies and moths)
At least 43 species of butterflies are endemic to the Eastern
Arc and contiguous forests in their foothills (De Jong and
Congdon, 1993; Congdon et al., 2001). A further 35 species
are only found on the higher altitude grasslands of the East-
ern Arc and further south into the Southern Highlands of Tan-
zania and into Malawi. The most important Eastern Arc
blocks in terms of endemic butterflies are the Rubeho (13 spe-
cies), Udzungwa (9 species), Usambara (7 species), Uluguru (7
species), and Nguru (4 species). The forest butterfly fauna also
has genera that are representative of groups which are more
diverse in the Central and West African rainforests.
5.2.4. Millipedes
Hoffman (1993) outlined the state of knowledge of the Eastern
Arc millipede fauna, showing that the East Usambaras,
Udzungwas and Ulugurus (the only areas where inventories
have been compiled) support at least 26 species and 10 genera
endemic to one or other of these mountains. New collections
from the East Usambara Mountains (Frontier Tanzania, 1999–
2002), Uluguru Mountains (Doggart et al., 2005) and Udzung-
wa Mountains (Frontier Tanzania, 2001) hold additional new
genera and species (Hoffman, pers. comm.). It is likely that
the number of endemic genera and species will rise signifi-
cantly with further research.
5.2.5. Bryophytes
The Eastern Arc Mountains support a diverse assemblage of
bryophytes, with around 700 species recorded (Po
´cs, 1998).
At least 32 species are endemic (5%). Although this level
of endemism is low compared with vascular plants, it is
high compared with the bryophyte flora of many other
areas. A number of monotypic endemic genera are also
present, for example Cladolejeunea and Neorutenbergia. A
notable feature of the bryoflora is the high number (45 spe-
cies, 6%) of Lemurian (Madagascan) species within the
assemblage, which reaches its peak in the Uluguru Moun-
tains (40 species). The bryoflora of the Usambara and Ulug-
uru Mountains is quite well known, but information is
scanty to non-existent for the other Eastern Arc mountain
blocks (Po
´cs, 1998).
5.3. Possible reasons for the exceptional rates of endemism
Why is there such a concentration of endemism in the East-
ern Arc Mountains? High level of endemism in East Africa
has traditionally been explained by ancient, isolating pro-
cesses related to the uplift of mountains during the Miocene
(Lovett, 1993). These isolating processes would be predicted
to result in species replacement patterns that are congruent
across many evolutionary lineages, something that does not
seem to be supported by recent studies (Bowie, 2003; Bowie
et al., 2004). A first step towards understanding the processes
responsible for such high endemism in the Eastern Arc has
been taken by Jetz et al. (2004), who examined whether ende-
mism in an area exceeds what can be explained from simple
null models based on stochastic effects. Jetz et al. (2004) show
that the Eastern Arc Mountains, and the Usambara and Ud-
zungwa Mountains in particular, have significantly more en-
demic species than expected by chance, or by environment
and topography alone. These results were interpreted as a
consequence of stable local conditions, but the analysis could
not separate to what degree the pattern can be attributed due
to local speciation or to species persistence (locally low
extinction or high speciation rates). Other kinds of evidence
provide information about the probable historical processes
operating in the Eastern Arc.
5.3.1. The Arc is as a centre of speciation
One of the possible explanations for the high number of
endemics in the Eastern Arc is that the area has had elevated
rates of speciation in situ. Various plant groups show remark-
able local radiations, for instance Impatiens spp. in the Ulug-
uru and Begonia spp. in the Udzungwa Mountains. For
Saintpaulia there is a strong support for recent diversification
of local populations in the Usambara Mountains (Lindqvist
and Albert, 2001). Other on-going studies suggest a strong de-
gree of recent genetic differentiation of populations of verte-
brates inhabiting different highlands (e.g. Bowie, 2003 and in
litt. for birds; Perkin et al., 2003 for galagos; Matthee et al.,
2004 for leaf chameleons; Loader et al., 2004 in litt. for
amphibians; E. Verheyen in litt. for rodents). Molecular stud-
ies also suggest both a considerable amount of gene-flow be-
tween populations inhabiting different tracts of highland
forest, but also some gene flow breaks, which in some cases
appear to correspond to physical barriers (Beresford et al.,
2004; Stanley and Olson, 2005), but in other cases are situated
in an area with no obvious physical barriers (Bowie et al.,
2004; Fjeldsa
˚et al., in press).
218 BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231
5.3.2. The Eastern Arc is as an area where species avoid
extinction
It has been suggested that the forest habitats have persisted in
the EAM for a prolonged period, even during particularly ex-
treme climatic phases (Lovett, 1993). This ecological stability is
thought to have promoted the persistence forest species and
overall reducing rates of extinction (Lovett and Wasser, 1993;
Fjeldsa
˚and Lovett, 1997). The direct evidence for permanence
of forest is lacking, but there is strong circumstantial evidence.
Firstly, a number of the genera and species in the Eastern
Arc Mountains are known to be genetically ancient. For exam-
ple, DNA analysis of forest birds indicates that some species
derive from lineages stretching back to the early Miocene
(c.f. 25 million years ago) (Fjeldsa
˚, 1994; Fjeldsa
˚and Lovett,
1997; Barker et al., 2004; Fuchs et al., 2005). Some of these spe-
cies have their strongest affinities with others in forested
areas in Southeast Asia; for example the Udzungwa partridge
Xenoperdix udzungwensis (Dinesen et al., 1994). Others may
date back to when there was forest cover across Africa, in
the middle and upper Miocene (Axelrod and Raven, 1978)as
DNA analyses of some of the isolated eastern bird subspecies
show they are divergent from their relatives in the Central
Congolian forests (Roy, 1997; Roy et al., 1997; Beresford, 2003).
Secondly, a number of taxonomic groups found in the EAM
contain members (or sometimes the entire group) that are of-
ten referred to as being ‘primitive’, i.e. extant members are
found on more basally branching parts of a phylogenetic tree.
For example, in mammals, the elephant shrews and galagos
are often considered, respectively, as early diverging macros-
celidean and prosimian lineages (Kingdon and Howell, 2005;
Bayes, 1998; Martin, 2003; Fjeldsa
˚et al., 2005; Masters et al.,
2005). These ‘primitive’ groups that are also referred to as an-
cient relict lineages, are well represented in the Eastern Arc
forests and, therefore, suggest a prolonged history of forest
habitats (Burgess et al., 1998a,b). Similarly, the amphibian fau-
na of the Eastern Arc contains a diverse number of taxa, many
of which are thought to share affinities with species found re-
stricted to distant montane regions of Africa (e.g. bufonids,
brevicipitines and caecilan lineages) (Nussbaum, 1985; Poyn-
ton, 1999; Wilkinson et al., 2002). Within the invertebrates,
Hochkirch (1998) presents information that indicates an an-
cient history for the grasshoppers of the Eastern Arc. In addi-
tion the mollusc fauna contains evidence of ancient faunal
connections to Madagascar (Emberton et al., 1997), as does
the vascular plant flora (Lovett and Friis, 1996) and the bryo-
phyte flora (Po
´cs, 1998). Further evidence of the ancient nature
of the Eastern Arc fauna is provided by comparisons with the
visually similar forests at comparable altitudes on the geolog-
ically recent (less than 2 million years old) volcanoes of the re-
gion (e.g. Kilimanjaro, Meru, Hanang). All the Eastern Arc
forested blocks have much higher rates of endemism than
those of these volcanic mountains (see e.g. Scharff, 1992; Po
´cs,
1998) – and most importantly - the relict species and biogeo-
graphical connections to Asia, Congo Basin and Madagascar
are lacking in the flora and fauna of the recent volcanoes.
Thirdly, despite there being strong evidence that climatic re-
gimes in East Africa highly fluctuated, and as a result so did the
floral composition (Trauth et al., 2005), it is likely that montane
habitats, such as those in EAM, were subject to less intensive
climatic changes and remained ecologically stable. The
elevated topography afforded montane regions more stable
climates (Lovett, 1993), buffering forest habitats during extreme
arid phases. Marine drill-core data has suggested that the
coastal waters of Tanzania were less influenced by Pleistocene
climatic changes than elsewhere (Prell et al., 1980), maintaining
warm and seasonally humid conditions in the coastal regions
and presumably the near-shore Eastern Arc Mountains. Long-
term forest stability, as indicated by fossils or climatic indica-
tors has not been investigated directly from any site in the
Eastern Arc, and this remains an important area of future re-
search for understanding the persistence of forest habitats in
the area. Within the period covered by rainfall records, the
African climate has shown marked annual fluctuations in both
wet and dry areas, with the climate in some places having a
much greater inter-annual variability than others (Nicholson,
1994; Owen et al., 1990; Trauth et al., 2005). However, the East-
ern Arc Mountains stand out for having a stable recent climate
within an analysis of 10 years meteorological satellite climate
data, and it has been postulated that this stability has persisted
over the long term (Fjeldsa
˚et al., 1997a,b).
5.4. Conservation priorities
Among the 13 Eastern Arc Mountain blocks the most impor-
tant blocks seem robust to the addition of new data. The top
three blocks have not changed since the analysis of Burgess
et al. (1998a,b) – and do not change when using alternative for-
est area estimates (e.g. Newmark, 1998, 2002) – with the East
Usambara, Uluguru and Udzungwa consistently being the
most important blocks. Plants also indicate the same three
areas as having the highest importance; for example the Ulug-
uru has more than 135 endemic plant species (Burgess et al.,
2002) and the East Usambaras more than 100 endemic species
(Iversen, 1991). The ranking of Eastern Arc blocks further down
the prioritized list has, however, been influenced by the dis-
covery of new species through undertaking new research in
poorly known mountain areas – e.g. the Rubeho Mountains
(Doggart et al., 2006). This new research has resulted in some
areas (notably the Nguru and the Rubeho Mountains) becom-
ing more important for conservation investment.
5.5. Conservation issues
The majority of the Eastern Arc Mountains are found in Tan-
zania and a number of issues affect their effective conserva-
tion. These issues are similar to those affecting the Taita
Hills of Kenya, where only 3 km
2
of fragmented forest re-
mains (Lens et al., 2002).
In Tanzania, the future of the biodiversity of the Eastern
Arc Mountains is closely tied to the management capability
and approach of the Forestry and Beekeeping Division (FBD)
of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, the (parast-
atal) Tanzanian National Parks Authority (TANAPA), and the
District Natural Resource Departments. The majority of the
remaining forest is managed by these agencies. Ultimately,
the conservation of the forests will also depend on the atti-
tudes, wishes and practices of the hundreds of rural commu-
nities living adjacent to the reserves.
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231 219
The Forestry and Beekeeping Division of the Tanzanian
government is working to improve the conservation status
of the Eastern Arc Mountains in a number of ways. Starting
from 2004, the Tanzanian government has initiated the
process to include the Eastern Arc Mountains on the list
of natural World Heritage Sites. The initial proposal was
submitted in 2005 and a letter received from UNESCO in
January 2006 confirmed that the Eastern Arc has been
placed on the Tentative List of World Heritage Sites. The
government is now working towards developing and sub-
mitting the full proposal dossier for this site – which will
be made up on a number of different forest areas across
this ‘archipelago’.
In addition Forestry and Beekeeping Division has also
undertaken a detailed analysis of the biological values of
the various blocks and reserves within the Eastern Arc
and has identified a number of areas that might be up-
graded from ‘protective Forest Reserves’ to ‘nature Forest
Reserves’. These are the Nilo Forest Reserve in the East
Usambara Mountains, the Uluguru North and Uluguru
South Forest Reserves in the Uluguru Mountains, the West
Kilombero Scarp Forest Reserve in the Udzungwa Moun-
tains, and the Nguru South Forest Reserve in the Nguru
Mountains. Active attempts to upgrade the status of these
areas to Nature Reserve are now underway for all but the
South Nguru FR.
To further recognise the importance of the network of For-
est Reserves in the Eastern Arc, the Forestry and Beekeeping
Division is working with the IUCN World Commission on Pro-
tected Areas (WCPA) to code each Forest Reserve in the East-
ern Arc according to IUCN protected area categories. Over 100
reserves have now been provisionally coded against these
categories, with most falling under category IV (habitat/spe-
cies management area). The full list and an accompanying
map will be submitted to IUCN WCPA during 2006.
Finally, the government is also working to gazette some of
the reserves that have been proposed for a number of years,
but never legally declared. There are seven proposed reserves
in the North Pare, South Pare, East Usambara and Udzungwa
Mountains that cover around 62,000 ha of Eastern Arc forest,
grassland and some woodland habitats. Their declaration
would be an important addition to the network of reserves
in this area (http://www.easternarc.or.tz).
A government analysis of problems affecting the manage-
ment of the Eastern Arc reserve network in Tanzania has
shown that the key constraints to effective conservation are
the lack of long-term availability of funding and inadequate
management capacity. Apart from meagre salary support,
the Tanzanian government (both central and local) provides
about $50,000 USD as operational funding to the 340 govern-
ment staff who are tasked with the management of over
7000 km
2
of Forest Reserves of the Eastern Arc (Burgess and
Kilahama, 2005) (Tab l e 2 ). The funds available from TANAPA
to its two National Parks containing Eastern Arc mountain
forest (Udzungwa and a small area in Mikumi) are much
greater than that allocated by FBD.
We believe that several possibilities exist to expand sus-
tainable financing of Eastern Arc Mountains conservation
within Tanzania and Kenya. One promising avenue involves
payments for ecosystems services, which would create
mechanisms that return funds from water users to the for-
est managers and surrounding communities. The Eastern
Arc provides drinking water for at least 60% of the urban
population of Tanzania, and is the source for over 90% of
the nation’s hydroelectricity generation capacity (which is
around 50% of total power production). A recent calculation
estimates the annual total economic value of the Eastern
Arc as at least $620 million (Government of Tanzania,
2004), but the water values are not well reflected in these
estimations and the actual values to the Tanzanian econ-
omy might be significantly greater. Another funding avenue
that is developing slowly is to direct the tourism away from
the northern circuit of national parks like the Serengeti,
Ngorongoro Crater and Tarangire systems toward the East-
ern Arc Mountains and coastal zone. This venture requires
adequate global and national marketing, where culture and
biodiversity other than large mammals offer tourists a dif-
ferent type of exploration that could generate money for lo-
cal economies. The government and private sectors are
working on this aspect of tourism for the Eastern Arc
Mountains, and as more local communities are involved,
the more likely the harmonisation of conservation will be
achieved.
In conclusion, the Eastern Arc Mountains are an area of
exceptional importance for biodiversity conservation. The
majority of the forest is located within national Forest Re-
serves that are managed for water catchment. Despite the
pressures, Forest Reserve boundaries, where they are clearly
defined, are mostly respected by the local people. However,
the funds available to the managers of the Forest Reserves
are insufficient. This makes management problematic and
allows significant illegal activities to take place within the
forests (timber cutting etc). The future of the forest re-
source on the Eastern Arc Mountains is tied to the manage-
ment capacity of the Forest and Beekeeping Division
(catchment forest section), to the District Natural Resource
offices in the 14 Districts across the Eastern Arc, and to
the attitudes and practices of the hundreds of thousands
of people who live within a few kilometres of the forest
boundaries.
Acknowledgements
Louis A. Hansen in Denmark is thanked for his input to
checking Table 1 of this paper and providing freely his knowl-
edge of the area. We thank all the researchers who have
worked in the Eastern Arc Mountain forests. The longest term
efforts to understand the values of these forests have come
from the University of Dar es Salaam in Tanzania, the Univer-
sity of Copenhagen in Denmark, York University in the UK
and the Frontier-Tanzania expedition programmes of the
Society for Environmental Exploration. We also thank the
organisers of the Society for Conservation Biology meeting
in New York 2004 for the opportunity to present this paper. Fi-
nally, we thank the managers of the Forest Reserves and Na-
tional Parks in the Eastern Arc Mountains as without their
efforts the biodiversity values in these mountains would be
very significantly less than is found today. Two anonymous
reviewers and Tim Caro greatly improved the quality of this
paper.
220 BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231
Appendix 1. Distribution of endemic and near-endemic vertebrates across the Eastern Arc Mountains
Species Authority Ende-
mism
Threat
status
(November
2005)
Forest Taita North
Pare
South
Pare
West
Usambara
East
Usambara
Nguu Nguru Uluguru Ukaguru Rubeho Malundwe Mahenge Udzungwa Coastal
Forests
from Kenya
to
Mozambique
Kilimanjaro,
Meru and/
or Kenya
Highlands
Southern
Rift (inc.
Rungwe,
Matengo,
Namuli, Nje,
Malawisi)
Birds
Andropadus fusciceps Shelley (1893)
***
NE LC FF x x x x x x x x
Andropadus masukuensis Shelley (1897)
***
NE LC FF x x x x x x x x x x x
Andropadus milanjensis Shelley (1896)
***
NE LC FF x x x x x x x x x x x x x
Anthreptes pallidigaster Reichenow (1905) NE EN F x xx
Anthreptes rubritorques Sclater and Moreau (1935) E VU FF x x x x x x
Apalis chariessa Reichenow (1879) NE VU FF xxxx
Apalis chapini Friedmann (1928) NE LC FF x x x x x x
Apalis fuscigularis Moreau (1938) E CR FF x
Arcanator orostruthus Vincent (1933) NE LC FF x xx
Artisornis moreaui Sclater (1931) NE CR FF x x
Artisornis metopias Reichenow (1907) NE LC FF x x x x x x x x
Batis mixta Shelley (1889) NE LC FF x x x x x x xn xn xn xn x x xn
Bubo vosseleri Reichenow (1907) E VU FF xu x x x x x x
Cisticola njombe Lynes (1933) NE LC NF xx x
Cisticola nigriloris Shelley (1897) NE LC NF xx x
Cinnyricinclus femoralis Richmond (1897) NE VU FF x x x
Hyliota usambarae Sclater (1932) E EN F x x
Laniarius fuelleborni Reichenow (1900) NE LC FF x x x x x x x
Lanius marwitzi Reichenow (1901) NE LC f xx x x
Malaconotus alius Friedmann (1927) E EN FF x
Modulatrix stictigula Reichenow (1906) NE LC FF x x x x x x x x
Nectarinia loveridgei Hartert (1922) E LC FF x
Nectarinia moreaui Sclater (1933) E LC FF x x x x x
Nectarinia rufipennis Jensen (1983) E VU FF x
Nectarinia usambarica Grote (1922)
****
E FF x xu x x x
Nectarinia fuelleborni Reichenow (1899)
****
NE FF xx
Oriolus chlorocephalus
*
Shelley (1896) NE LC F x x x x x x x
Ploceus nicolli Sclater (1931) E EN FF x x x x
Poeoptera kenricki Shelley (1894) NE LC FF x x x x x x x x x x
Scepomycter winifredae Moreau (1938) E VU FF xx x x
Serinus whytii Shelley (1897) NE LC NF xx x
Serinus melanochrous Reichenow (1900) NE LC F xx x
Sheppardia aurantiithorax Beresford et al. (2004) EFF xx x
Sheppardia lowei
*
Grant and Mackworth-
Praed (1941)
NE VU FF xa x x
Sheppardia montana Reichenow (1907) E EN FF x
Sheppardia sharpei Shelley (1903) NE LC FF x x x x x xu x x x
Sheppardia gunningi Reichenow (1878) NE VU FF x xx
Stactolaema olivacea
*
Shelley (1880) NE LC F x x x x x x x x x x
Swynnertonia swynnertoni Shelley (1906) NE VU FF x xx
Turdus helleri Mearns (1913) E CR FF x
Turdus roehli Reichenow (1905)§ E FF x x x x
Xenoperdix udzungwensis Dinesen et al. (1994) EEN FF x
Xenoperdix obscurata Fjeldsa
˚and Kiure (2003)
ˆEEN FF x
Zosterops silvanus Peter and Loveridge (1935) E EN F x
Zosterops winifredae Sclater (1935) E VU F x
Mammals
Beamys hindei Thomas (1909) NE NT F x x x x x x x x x x x xu x
Cephalophus spadix True (1890) NE VU FF x x x x x
Cercocebus sanjei
**
Mittermeier (1986) E FF x
Congosorex phillipsorum Stanley et al. (2005) E FF x
Crocidura desperata Hutterer et al. (1991) NE EN FF xx
Crocidura monax sensu lato Thomas (1910) NE DD FF x x x x x x x x x
Crocidura tansaniana Hutterer (1986) E VU FF x x
Crocidura telfordi Hutterer (1986) E EN FF xx
Crocidura usambarae Dippenaar (1980) E EN FF x x x
Dendrohyrax validus True (1890) NE VU FF x x x x x x x x x x x
Galagoides orinus Lawrence and Washburn (1936) E DD FF x x x x x
(continued on next page)
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231 221
Appendix 1 – continued
Species Authority Ende-
mism
Threat
status
(November
2005)
Forest Taita North
Pare
South
Pare
West
Usambara
East
Usambara
Nguu Nguru Uluguru Ukaguru Rubeho Malundwe Mahenge Udzungwa Coastal
Forests
from Kenya
to
Mozambique
Kilimanjaro,
Meru and/
or Kenya
Highlands
Southern
Rift (inc.
Rungwe,
Matengo,
Namuli, Nje,
Malawisi)
Galagoides zanzibaricus Matschie (1893) NE VU FF x x x x
Hylomyscus arcimontensis Carleton and Stanley (2005) NE FF x x x x x x x x x
Rungwecebus kipunji Jones et al. (2005) NE FF xx
Myonycteris relicta
*
Bergmans (1980) NE VU FF x x x x
Myosorex geata Allen and Loveridge (1927) E DD FF x
Myosorex kihaulei Stanley and Hutterer (2000) EEN FF x
Paraxerus vexillarius Kershaw (1923) NE VU FF x xu x x x x
Procolobus gordonorum Matschie (1900) E VU FF x
Rhinolophus deckenii Peters (1867) NE DD F x x x x
Rhinolophus maendeleo Kock et al. (2000) NE DD FF x x
Rhynchocyon petersi Bocage (1880) NE EN F x x x x x x x x xb
Sylvisorex howelli Jenkins (1984) E VU FF x x x x x x
Reptiles
Adenorhinos barbouri Loveridge (1930) NE f xx
Agama montana Barbour and Loveridge (1928) E F x x x x
Amblyodipsas teitana Broadley (1971) E F x
Aparallactus werneri Boulenger (1895) NE F x x x x xx
Atheris ceratophora Werner (1895) E F x x x
Buhoma procterae Loveridge (1922) E FF xx
Buhoma vauerocegae Tornier (1902) E FF x x
Chamaeleo deremensis Matschie (1892) E FF x x x
Chamaeleo fischeri Reichenow (1887) E FF x x x x
Chamaeleo goetzei Tornier (1899) NE NF xx
Chamaeleo laterispinis Loveridge (1953) E F x
Chamaeleo oxyrhinum Klaver and Bo
¨hme (1988) E FF x x x x
Chamaeleo tempeli Tornier (1899) NE F xx
Chamaeleo tenue Matschie (1892) E F x
Chamaeleo werneri Tornier (1899) E F x x x x x
Cnemaspis barbouri Perret (1986) NE FF x x x
Cnemaspis uzungwae Perret (1986) NE FF xx
Crotaphopeltis tornieri Werner (1908) NE FF x x x x x x x
Dipsadoboa werneri Boulenger (1897) E FF x x x
Elapsoidea nigra Gu
¨nther (1888) E F x x x x x
Gastropholis prasina Werner (1904) NE F x x x
Leptosiaphos rhomboidalis Broadley (1989) E FF x
Lycophidion uzungwense Loveridge (1932) E F x
Lygodactylus conradti Matschie (1892) NE FF x x
Lygodactylus gravis
*
Pasteur (1964) NE FF x x x
Lygodactylus uluguruensis Pasteur (1964) NE F x x
Lygodactylus williamsi Loveridge (1952) E FF x
Melanoseps uzungwensis Loveridge (1942) E FF x
Philothamnus macrops Boulenger (1895) NE F x x x x x x
Prosymna ornatissima Barbour and Loveridge (1928) E FF x
Prosymna semifasciata Broadley (1995) NE FF x x
Rieppeleon brevicaudatus Matschie (1892) NE F x x x x x x
Rhampholeon spinosum Matschie (1892) E FF x x
Rhampholeon moyeri Menegon et al. (2002) EFF xn x x
Rhampholeon temporalis Matschie (1892) E FF x
Rhampholeon uluguruensis
(complex)
Tilbury and Emmrich (1996) E FF x x x x
Rhampholeon sp. nov. Matthee et al. (2004) EFF x
Rhinotyphlops nigrocandidus Broadley and Wallach (2000) EFF xx x
Rhinotyphlops gierrai Mocquard (1897) NE FF/F x xu x
Scelotes uluguruensis Barbour and Loveridge (1928) E FF x x x x
Tetradactylus udzungwensis Salvidio et al. (2004) ENF x
Thelotornis usambaricus Broadley (2001) NE F x x x x
Typhlops uluguruensis Barbour and Loveridge (1928) E F x
Typhlops usambaricus Laurent (1964) E FF x
Urocotyledon wolterstorffi
*
Tornier (1900) NE FF x x x
Xyeledontophis uluguruensis Broadley and Wallach (2002) EFF x
222 BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231
Species Authority Ende-
mism
Threat
status
(November
2005)
Forest Taita North
Pare
South
Pare
West
Usambara
East
Usambara
Nguu Nguru Uluguru Ukaguru Rubeho Malundwe Mahenge Udzungwa Coastal
Forests
from Kenya
to
Mozambique
Kilimanjaro,
Meru and/
or Kenya
Highlands
Southern
Rift (inc.
Rungwe,
Matengo,
Namuli, Nje,
Malawisi)
Amphibians
Afrixalus uluguruensis Barbour and Loveridge (1928) NE VU FF x x x x x x x x x
Afrixalus morerei Dubois (1986) ‘‘1985’’ E VU f x
Arthroleptides martiensseni Nieden (1910) NE EN FF x x
Arthroleptides yakusini Channing et al. (2002) EEN FF x x x x
Arthroleptis affinis Ahl (1939) NE LC FF x x x x x x x
Arthroleptis reichei Nieden (1910) NE NT FF xx
Arthroleptis nikeae Poynton (2003) EEN FF x
Arthroleptis tanneri Grandison (1983) E VU FF x
Arthroleptis xenodactylus Boulenger (1909) E VU F x
Boulengerula boulengeri Tornier (1896) E LC FF x x
Boulengerula niedeni Mu
¨ller et al. (2005) EVU F x
Boulengerula taitanus Loveridge (1935) E LC F x
Boulengerula uluguruensis Barbour and Loveridge (1928) E LC F x x
Bufo brauni Nieden (1910) E EN FF x x x x x
Bufo uzunguensis Loveridge (1932) NE VU NF xx
Callulina kisiwamsitu De Sa
´et al. (2004) EFF x
Callulina kreffti Nieden (1911) ‘‘1910’’ E LC FF x x x xu x x x x x x
Churamiti maridadi Channing and Stanley (2002) ECR FF x
Hoplophryne rogersi Barbour and Loveridge (1928) E EN FF x x
Hoplophryne uluguruensis Loveridge (1925) E VU FF x x x
Hyperolius kihangensis Schiøtz and Westergaard in
Schiøtz (1999)
EEN FF x
Hyperolius puncticulatus Pfeffer (1893) NE LC F x x x x x x x x x x x
Hyperolius minutissimus Schiøtz (1975) NE VU NF xx
Hyperolius spinigularis Stevens (1971) NE LC f x x x x x x x
Hyperolius tannerorum Schiøtz (1982) E EN FF x
Hyperolius tornieri Ahl (1931) E DD F x
Leptopelis barbouri Ahl (1929) NE VU FF x x x x x
Leptopelis uluguruensis Barbour and Loveridge (1928) E VU FF x x x x x
Leptopelis vermiculatus Boulenger (1909) NE VU FF x x x x x x x x
Leptopelis parkeri Barbour and Loveridge (1928) E VU FF x x x x x
Nectophrynoides asperginis Poynton et al. (1999) E CR NF x
Nectophrynoides cryptus Perret (1971) E EN FF x
Nectophrynoides frontierei Menegon et al. (2004) EDD FF x
Nectophrynoides laevis Menegon et al. (2004) EDD FF x
Nectophrynoides minutus Perret (1972) E EN FF xx
Nectophrynoides poyntoni Menegon et al. (2004) ECR FF x
Nectophrynoides
pseudotornieri
Menegon et al. (2004) EEN FF x
Nectophrynoides tornieri Roux (1906) NE LC FF x x x x x x
Nectophrynoides vestergaardi Menegon et al. (2004) EEN FF x
Nectophrynoides viviparus Tornier (1905) NE VU F xx x x
Nectophrynoides wendyae Clarke (1988, 1989) E CR FF x
Parhoplophryne usambarica Barbour and Loveridge (1928) E CR F x
Phlyctimantis keithae Schiøtz (1974) E VU f x
Phrynobatrachus kreffti Boulenger (1909) E EN F x x x
Phrynobatrachus uzungwensis Grandison and Howell (1983) E EN FF x x x x
Probreviceps macrodactylus Nieden (1926) E VU FF x x x
Probreviceps rungwensis Loveridge (1932) NE VU FF xx
Probreviceps
uluguruensis
Loveridge (1925) E VU FF x
Scolecomorphus
kirkii
Boulenger (1883) NE LC FF x x x x x x
Scolecomorphus
uluguruensis
Barbour and Loveridge (1928) E LC FF x
Scolecomorphus
vittatus
Boulenger (1895) E VU FF x x x x x x x
Spelaeophryne
methneri
Ahl (1924) NE LC F xxxxx
Stephopaedes
usambarae
Poynton and Clarke (1999) EEN FF x
(continued on next page)
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231 223
Appendix 1 – continued
Species Authority Ende-
mism
Threat
status
(November
2005)
Forest Taita North
Pare
South
Pare
West
Usambara
East
Usambara
Nguu Nguru Uluguru Ukaguru Rubeho Malundwe Mahenge Udzungwa Coastal
Forests
from Kenya
to
Mozambique
Kilimanjaro,
Meru and/or
Kenya
Highlands
Southern
Rift (inc.
Rungwe,
Matengo,
Namuli, Nje,
Malawisi)
Threatened animals in the Eastern Arc that are neither endemic nor near-endemic
Hirundo atrocaerulea
*
Sundevall (1850) No VU NF xx
Otomops
martiensseni
Matschie (1897) No VU F x xx
Loxodonta africana Blumm enbach
(1797)
No EN NF/f x x x x x X x x x
Diceros bicornis Linnaeus (1758) No CR NF/f xu xu
Panthera leo Linnaeus (1758) No VU NF/f xx
Rhynchocyon cirnei Peters (1847) No VU F/f xx x x x
Cinnyricinclus femoralis Richmond (1897) No VU F x x x
Key: Endemism E = strictly endemi c; NE = near-endemic (also found in at least one other African ecoregion); No = not endemic. Red List threat codes according to the IUCN red list (accessed November 2005). CR = critically endang ered, EN = endangered, VU = vulnerable,
DD = data deficient, NT = near-threatened, LC = least concern, Blank = not evaluated. Forest – degree of forest dependence (FF = strictly confined to forest; F = mainly forest, but also found outside; f = forest visitor; NF = non-forest species). Records – x = confirmed presence;
xa = record from the Andersen collection in Copenhagen; xb = recent camera trap photos cast doubt on taxonomy of these records; xn = new species in the pro cess of being described, but retained within the original taxon for the purposes of this paper; xu = record uncertain
(and not used for analysis); ** = species not formally described; *** = updated taxonomy in Roy et al. (1997) is not followed here; **** = taxonomy updated by Bowie et al. (2004); § = taxonomy updated by Bowie et al. (2004);ˆ= taxonomy updated by Bowie and Fjeldsa
˚(2005).
*
Distributional notes on some Eastern Arc near-endemic species that are found elsewhere in Africa.. Oriolus chlorocephalus = Southern Malawi into Mozamb ique, Sheppardia lowei, xa = Uluguru record from Andersen collection, Stactolaema olivacea = South Africa, Hirundo
atrocaerulea = Udzungwa, Southern Rift, Uganda, South Africa, Malawi, Myonycteris relicta = also Haroni-Rusitu in Zimbabwe, Lygodactylus gravis = Maji Kununua (Mkomazi), Urocotyledon wolterstorffi = possible record from Arusha.
224 BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231
Appendix 2. Distribution of endemic and near endemic trees across the forests of the Eastern Arc Mountains
Taita North
Pare
South
Pare
West
Usambara
East
Usambara
Nguu South
Nguru
Uluguru Ukaguru Rubeho Malundwe Udzungwa Maheng e Near endemic
Anisophyllaceae
Anisophyllea obtusifolia Engl. and Brehm.
§
11 1
Annonaceae
Annonaceae gen. nov. = Ede 65
*
1
Anonidium usambarense R.E. Fries
§
1
Enantia kummeriae Engl. and Diels
§
11 1
Greenwaydendron suaveolens (Engl. and Diels) Verdc. subsp. usambaricum Verdc.
§
11
Isolona heinsenii Engl. and Diels
§
1 1 Also coastal
Lettowianthus stellatus Diels U
1 1 1 1 1 Also coastal
Polyceratocarpus scheffleri Engl. and Diels
§*
11 1
Uvariodendron gorgonis Verdc.
1 1 1 1 Also coastal
Uvariodendron oligocarpum Verdc.
§
11
Uvariodendron pycnophyllum (Diels) R.E. Fries
§
11
Uvariodendron usambarense R.E. Fries
§
111
Araliaceae
Polyscias stuhlmannii Harms
à
11 111
Schefflera lukwangulensis (Tennant) Bernardi
à
111
Celastraceae
Platypterocarpus tanganyikensis Dunkley and Brenan
k
1
Chrysobalanaceae
Hirtella megacarpa R. Grah.
*
11 1
Clusiaceae
Allanblackia stuhlmannii (Engl.) Engl.
§*
111111 1 1
Allanblackia ulugurensis Engl.
*à
11 1
Garcinia semseii Verdc.
§
11 1 1
Mammea usambarensis Verdc.
*
11
Ebenaceae
Diospyros kabuyeana F. White U1 1 1 1 Also coastal
Diospyros occulta F. White
§
U
11 1 Also coastal
Diospyros sp. aff. amaniensis Guerke
*
111
Euphorbiaceae
Croton dictyophlebodes A.R.-Sm.
*k
1
Drypetes usambarica (Pax) Hutch.
§*
1 1 1 1 1 1 Also coastal
Macaranga conglomerata Brenan
*
11
Sibangea pleioneura A.R.-Sm.
§
1
Fabaceae
Angylocalyx braunii Harms U
11 1 Also coastal
Cynometra brachyrrachis Harms
1 Also coastal
Cynometra engleri Harms
1
Cynometra longipedicellata Harms
§
1
Cynometra sp. A
§
11
Cynometra sp. B
§
1
Cynometra ulugurensis Harms
1
Englerodendron usambarense Harms
§
11
Isoberlinia scheffleri (Harms) Greenway
*
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Also coastal
Millettia elongatistyla Gillett
11
Newtonia paucijuga (Harms) Brenan
1 1 1 1 Also coastal
Pterocarpus mildbraedii Harms subsp. usambarensis (Verdc.) Polhill
111
Scorodophloeos fischeri (Taub.) J. Le
´on. U
1 1 1 1 1 1 Also coastal
Zenkerella capparidacea (Taub.) J. Le
´on.
§*
11 11
Zenkerella egregia J. Le
´on.
111 Also coastal
Zenkerella perplexa Temu
§*
11
(continued on next page)
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231 225
Appendix 2 – continued
Taita North
Pare
South
Pare
West
Usambara
East
Usambara
Nguu South
Nguru
Uluguru Ukaguru Rubeho Malundwe Udzungwa Mahenge Near endemic
Flacourtiaceae
Dasylepis integra Warb.
*
111 Also Mbulu
Casearia engleri Gilg
*à
1
Lauraceae
Beilschmidia kweo (Mildbr.) Robyns and Wilczek
§*
11 1 1
Melastomataceae
Lijndenia brenanii (A. and R. Fernandes) Jacq. Fe
´l.
§
1
Lijndenia greenwayii (Brenan) Borhidi
§
1
Memecylon sp. A
*
1
Memecylon teitense Wickens
*
1
Myristicaceae
Cephalosphaera usambarensis (Warb.) Warb.
§
1 1 1 1 1 Also Shimba Hills
Myrtaceae
Syzygium micklethwaitii Verdc.
§*
11 1
Ochnaceae
Ouratea scheffleri Engl. and Gilg
§
1
Ouratea schusteri Gilg ex Engl.
*
11 1 1
Octoknemataceae
Octoknema orientalis Mildbr.
§
111
Pittosporaceae
Pittosporum goetzei Engl.
à
1
Rutaceae
Calodendrum eickii Engl.
k
1
Sapindaceae
Allophylus melliodorus Radlk.
§*
11 1
Pancovia sp. B 1 Also North Malawi
Placodiscus amaniensis Radlk.
§
1
Placodiscus pedicellatus F.G. Davies
§
1
Sapotaceae
Neohemsleya usambarensis Pennington
*
11
Omphalocarpum strombocarpum Y. B. H a r v. a n d J. C . L ov e tt
§
1
Pouteria pseudoracemosa (J.H. Hemsl.) L. Gautier
§
11 1
Sterculiaceae
Cola scheffleri K. Schum.
§
11 1
Leptonychia usambarensis K. Schum.
§*
1 111111 1
Tiliaceae
Grewia goetzeana K. Schum.
§
11 Also coastal
Verbenaceae
Vitex amaniensis Pieper
§*
111 1
Totals 8 0 1 27 40 6 25 26 4 0 4 36 5
Notes on habitat associations: § = submontane forest; U= dry lowland forest; = lowland forest; *= montane forest; k= dry montane forest; à= upper montane forest.
226 BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231
REFERENCES
Axelrod, D.I., Raven, P.H., 1978. Late cretaceous and tertiary
vegetation history of Africa. In: Werger, M.J.A. (Ed.),
Biogeography and Ecology of Southern Africa. Dr. W. Junk
Publications, The Hague, pp. 77–130.
Baker, M., 2001. A survey of the avifauna of the Chome Forest
Reserve, South Pare Mountains, north-east Tanzania. Report to
East African Cross-Borders Biodiversity Project, GEF/UNDP
URT/97/31. Available from: <http://www.easternarc.or.tz>.
Baker, N.E., Baker, E.M., 2002. Important bird areas in Tanzania: a
first inventory. Wildlife Conservation Society of Tanzania, Dar
es Salaam, Tanzania.
Balmford, A., Moore, J.L., Brooks, T., Burgess, N., Hansen, L.A.,
Williams, P., Rahbek, C., 2001a. Conservation conflicts across
Africa. Science 291, 2616–2619.
Balmford, A., Moore, J., Brooks, T., Burgess, N., Hansen, L.A.,
Lovett, J.C., Tokumine, S., Williams, P., Rahbek, C., 2001b.
People and biodiversity in Africa. Science 293, 1591–1592.
Barker, F.K., Cibois, A., Schikler, P., Feinstein, J., Cracraft, J., 2004.
Phylogeny and diversification of the largest avian radiation.
PNAS 101, 11040–11045.
Basilewsky, P., 1962. Mission Zoologique de l’I.R.S.A.C. en Afrique
orientale. LX. Coleoptera Carabidae. Annales Muse
´eRoyalde
l’Afrique Centrale, Tervuren, Se
´rie Octavo. Sciences
Zoologiques 107, 48–337.
Basilewsky, P., 1976. Mission entomologique du Muse
´e Royal de
l’Afrique Central aux Monts Uluguru, Tanzania. 19.
Coleoptera, Carabidae. Revue de Zoologie Africaine 90, 671–
722.
Bayes, M., 1998. A molecular phylogenetic study of the galagos,
strepsirrhine primates and archontan mammals. Unpublished
Ph.D. thesis. Oxford Brookes University, UK.
Bearder, S.K., Ambrose, L., Harcourt, C., Honess, P., Perkin, A.,
Pimley, E., Pullen, S., Svoboda, N., 2003. Species-typical
patterns of infant contact, sleeping site use and social
cohesion among noctural primates in Africa. Folia
Primatologica 74, 337–354.
Beresford, P., 2003. Molecular systematics of Alethe,Sheppardia and
some other African robins (Muscicapoidea). Ostrich 74, 58–73.
Beresford, P., Fjeldsa
˚, J., Kiure, J., 2004. A new species of akalat
(Sheppardia) narrowly endemic in the Eastern Arc of Tanzania.
AUK 121, 23–34.
Bowie, R.C.K., 2003. Birds, molecules and evolutionary processes
among Africa’s islands in the sky. Ph.D. thesis, University of
Cape Town, South Africa.
Bowie, R.C.K., Fjeldsa
˚, J., 2005. Historical population structure of
the Udzungwa forest partridge with comments on the
taxonomic status of Xenoperdix udzungwensis obscurata. Journal
of East African Natural History 94, 191–201.
Bowie, R.C.K., Fjeldsa
˚, J., Hackett, S.J., Crowe, T.M., 2004.
Systematics and biogeography of double-collared sunbirds
from the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania. Auk 121, 660–
681.
Bowie, R.C.K., Voelker, G., Fjeldsa
˚, J., Lens, L., Hackett, S.J., Crowe,
T.M., 2005. Systematics of the olive thrush Turdus olivaceus
species complex with reference to the taxonomic status of the
endangered Taita thrush T. helleri. Journal of Avian Biology 36,
391–404.
Broadley, D.G., 2001. A review of the genus Thelotornis A. Smith in
eastern Africa, with description of a new species from
Usambara Mountains (Serpentes: Colubridae: Dispolidhini).
African Journal of Herpetology 50, 53–70.
Broadley, D.G., Wallach, V., 2000. A new blind snake (Serpentes:
Typhlopidae) from montane forest of the Eastern Arc
Mountains in Tanzania. African Journal of Herpetology 49,
165–168.
Broadley, D.G., Wallach, V., 2002. Review of the Dispholidini, with
the description of a new genus and species from Tanzania.
Bulletin of the Natural History Museum London (Zoology) 68,
57–74.
Brooks, T., Lens, L., De Meyer, M., Waiyaki, E., Wilder, C., 1998.
Avian biogeography of the Taita Hills, Kenya. Journal of East
African Natural History 87, 189–194.
Brooks, T., Balmford, A., Burgess, N., Fjeldsa
˚, J., Hansen, L.A.,
Moore, J., Rahbek, C., Williams, P., 2001. Towards a blueprint
for conservation in Africa. BioScience 51, 613–624.
Brooks, T.M., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Da Fonseca,
G.A.B., Rylands, A.B., Konstant, W.R., Flick, P., Pilgrim, J.,
Oldfield, S., Magin, G., Hilton-Taylor, C., 2002. Habitat loss and
extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conservation
Biology 16, 909–923.
Burgess, N.D., Clarke, G.P. (Eds.), 2000. The Coastal Forests of
Eastern Africa. IUCN Forest Conservation Programme, Gland
and Cambridge.
Burgess, N.D., Kilahama, F., 2005. Is enough being invested in
Tanzania’s Eastern Arc Mountains? The Arc Journal 17, 2–5.
Available from: <http://www.tfcg.org>.
Burgess, N.D., Mlingwa, C.O.F., 2000. Evidence for altitudinal
movements of forest birds in the Eastern Arc Mountains,
Tanzania. Ostrich 71, 184–190.
Burgess, N.D., Nummelin, M., Fjeldsa
˚, J., Howell, K.M.,
Lukumbyzya, K., Mhando, L., Phillipson, P., Vanden Berghe, E.
(Eds.), 1998a. Biodiversity and conservation of the Eastern Arc
Mountains of Tanzania and Kenya. Special Issue of the Journal
of East African Natural History 87, 1–367 pp.
Burgess, N.D., Fjeldsa
˚, J., Botterweg, R., 1998b. Faunal importance
of the Eastern Arc Mountains of Kenya and Tanzania. Journal
of East African Natural History 87, 1–21.
Burgess, N.D., Doggart, N.H., Lovett, J.C., 2002. The Uluguru
Mountains of eastern Tanzania: the effect of forest loss on
biodiversity. Oryx 36, 140–152.
Burgess, N.D., Lovett, J., Rodgers, A., Kilahama, F., Nashanda, E.,
Davenport, T., Butynski, T., 2004a. Eastern Arc Mountains and
Southern Rift. In: Mittermeier, R.A., Robles-Gil, P., Hoffmann,
M., Pilgrim, J.D., Brooks, T.M., Mittermeier, C.G., Lamoreux, J.L.,
Fonseca, G.A.B. (Eds.), Hotspots Revisited: Earth’s Biologically
Richest and Most Endangered Ecoregions, second ed. Cemex,
Mexico, pp. 245–255.
Burgess, N., D’Amico Hales, J., Underwood, E., Dinerstein, E.,
Olson, D., Itoua, I., Schipper, J., Ricketts, T., Newman, K., 2004b.
Terrestrial Ecoregions of Africa and Madagascar: A
Continental Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC.
pp. 1–550.
Burgess, N.D., D’Amico Hales, J., Ricketts, T., Dinerstein, E., 2006.
Factoring species, non-species values and threats into
biodiversity priority-setting across the ecoregions of Africa
and its islands. Biological Conservation 127, 383–401.
Butynski, T.M., Ehardt, C.L., 2003. Notes on ten restricted-range
birds in the Udzungwa Mountains. Scopus 23, 12–27.
Carleton, M.D., Stanley, W.T., 2005. Review of the Hylomyscus
denniae complex (Rodentia: Muridae) in Tanzania, with
description of a new species. Proceedings of the Biological
Society of Washington 118, 619–646.
CEPF, 2003. Ecosystem Profile: Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal
Forests of Tanzania and Kenya Biodiversity Hotspot. Critical
Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Washington, DC. Available from:
<http://www.cepf.net>.
Channing, A., Stanley, W.T., 2002. A new tree toad from Tanzania.
African Journal of Herpetology 51, 121–128.
Channing, A., Moyer, D.C., Howell, K.M., 2002. Description of a
new torrent frog in the genus Arthroleptides from Tanzania
(Ranidae). Alythes 20, 13–27.
Channing, A., Menegon, M., Salvidio, S., Akker, S., 2005. A new
forest toad from the Ukaguru Mountains, Tanzania
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231 227
(Bufonidae: Nectophrynoides). African Journal of Herpetology
54, 149–157.
Cheek, M., 2004. Kupeaeae, a new tribe of Triuridaceae from
Africa. Kew Bulletin 58, 939–949.
Clausnitzer, V., 2001. Notes on the species diversity of East African
Odonata, with a checklist of species. Odonatologica 30, 49–66.
Congdon, T.C.E., Gardiner, A., Bampton, I., 2001. Some endemic
butterflies of Kenya, Tanzania and Malawi. ABRI, P.O. Box
14308, Nairobi, Kenya.
Cordeiro, N.J., 1998. A preliminary survey of the montane avifauna
of Mt. Nilo, East Usambaras, Tanzania. Scopus 20, 1–18.
Cordeiro, N.J., Kiure, J., 1995. An investigation of the forest
avifauna in the North Pare Mountains, Tanzania. Scopus 19,
9–26.
Cordeiro, N.J., Seddon, N., Capper, D.R., Ekstrom, J.R.R., Howell,
K.M., Isherwood, I.S., Msuya, C.A.M., Mushi, J.T., Perkin, A.W.,
Pople, R.G., Stanley, W.T., 2005. Notes on the ecology and status
of some forest mammals in three Eastern Arc Mountains.
Journal of East African Natural History 94, 175–189.
Davenport, T.R.B., Stanley, W.T., Sargis, E.J., De Luca, D.W.,
Mpunga, N.E., Machaga, S.J., Olson, L.E., 2006. A new genus of
African Monkey, Rungwecebus: morphology, ecology, and
molecular phylogenetics. Science 312, 1378–1381.
Davis, A., Mvungi, E., 2004. Two new endangered species of Coffea
(Rubiaceae) from the Eastern Arc Mountains (Tanzania) and
notes on associated conservation issues. Botanical Journal of
the Linnean Society 146, 237–245.
De Jong, R., Congdon, T.C.E., 1993. The montane butterflies of the
eastern African forests. In: Lovett, J.C., Wasser, S.K. (Eds.),
Biogeography and Ecology of the Rain Forests of Eastern
Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp.
133–173.
De Luca, D.W., Mpunga, N.E., 2002. Preliminary observations of
Lowe’s Servaline Genet (Genetta servalina lowei) from
Udzungwa Mountains National Park, Tanzania. Small
Carnivore Conservation 27, 17–18.
De Sa
´, R.O., Loader, S.P., Channing, A., 2004. A new species of
Callulina (Anura: Microhylidae) from the West Usambara
Mountains, Tanzania. Journal of Herpetology 38, 219–224.
Dinesen, L., Lehmberg, T., Svendsen, J.O., Hansen, L.A., Fjeldsa
˚,J.,
1994. A new genus and species of perdicine bird (Phasianidae,
Perdicini) from Tanzania: a relict form with Indo-Malayan
affinities. IBIS 136, 2–11.
Dinesen, L., Lehmberg, T., Rahner, M.C., Fjeldsa
˚, J., 2000.
Conservation priorities for the forests of the Udzungwa
Mountains, Tanzania, based on primates, duikers and birds.
Biological Conservation 99, 223–236.
Doggart, N.H., Lovett, J., Mhoro, B., Kiure J., Burgess, N.D., 2005.
Biodiversity surveys in eleven Forest Reserves in the vicinity of
the Uluguru Mountains, Tanzania. Wildlife Conservation
Society of Tanzania, and Tanzania Forest Conservation Group,
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Available from: <http://
www.easternarc.or.tz>.
Doggart, N.H., Perkin, A., Kiure, J., Fjeldsa
˚, J., Poynton, J., Burgess,
N.D., 2006. Changing places: how the results of new fieldwork
in the Rubeho Mountains influence conservation priorities in
the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania. African Journal of
Ecology 44, 134–144.
Emberton, K.C., Pearce, T.A., Kasigwa, P., Tattersfield, P., Habibu,
Z., 1997. High diversity and regional endemism in land snails
of eastern Tanzania. Biodiversity and Conservation 6,
1123–1136.
Evans, T.D., 1997. Records of birds from the forest of the East
Usambara lowlands, Tanzania, August 1994–February 1995.
Scopus 19, 95–108.
Evans, T.D., Anderson, G.Q.A., 1993. Results of an ornithological
survey in the Ukaguru and East Usambara mountains,
Tanzania. Scopus 17, 40–47.
Fjeldsa
˚, J., 1994. Geographical patterns of relict and young species
of birds in Africa and South America and implications for
conservation priorities. Biodiversity and Conservation 3,
107–126.
Fjeldsa
˚, J., 1999. The impact of human forest disturbance on the
endemic avifauna of the Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania. Bird
Conservation International 9, 47–62.
Fjeldsa
˚, J., Kiure, J., 2003. A new population of the Udzungwa
Forest Partridge. Bulletin of British Ornithologists Club 123,
52–57.
Fjeldsa
˚, J., Lovett, J.C., 1997. Geographical patterns of old and
young species in African forest biota: the significance of
specific montane areas as evolutionary centers. Biodiversity
and Conservation 6, 325–347.
Fjeldsa
˚, J., Ehrlich, D., Lambin, E., Prins, E., 1997a. Are biodiversity
‘hotspots’ correlated with current ecological stability? A pilot
study using the NOAA-AVHRR remote sensing data.
Biodiversity and Conservation 6, 401–423.
Fjeldsa
˚, J., Howell, K., Andersen, M., 1997b. An ornithological visit
to the Rubeho Mountains, Tanzania. Scopus 19, 73–82.
Fjeldsa
˚, J., Bayes, M.K., Bruford, M.W., Roy, M.S., 2005.
Biogeography and diversification of African forest faunas:
implications for conservation. In: Bermingham, E., Moritz, C.,
Dick, C.W. (Eds.), Tropical Rainforests: Past, Present, and
Future. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.
Fjeldsa
˚, J., Kiure, J., Doggart, N., Hansen, L.A., Perkin, A., in press.
Distribution of highland forest birds across a potential
dispersal barrier in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania.
Steenstrupia.
Frontier Tanzania, 1999–2002. East Usambara Biodiversity
Surveys. Reports for the East Usambara Conservation Area
and Management Project, Tanga, Tanzania. Available from:
<http://www.easternarc.or.tz>.
Frontier Tanzania, 2001. West Kilombero Scarp Forest Reserve –
management and summary report. In: Doody, K.Z., Howell,
K.M., Fanning, E. (Eds.), Report for the Udzungwa Mountains
Management and Biodiversity Conservation Project. MEMA,
Iringa, Tanzania, pp. 1–78. Available from: <http://
www.easternarc.or.tz>.
Frontier-Tanzania, 2001–2004. Mahenge Mountain Biodiversity
Surveys. Society for Environmental Exploration and University
of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Available from: <http://
www.easternarc.or.tz>.
Fuchs, J., Fjeldsa
˚, J., Bowie, R.C.K., Volker, G., Pasquet, E., 2005. The
African warbler genus Hyliota as a lost lineage in the Oscine
songbird tree: molecular support for the African origin of the
Passerida. Molecular Phylogeny Evolution 39, 186–197.
Gereau, R.E., Luke, W.R.Q., 2003. List of potentially threatened
plants in the Eastern Arc mountains and East African coastal
forest mosaic biodiversity hotspot of Kenya and Tanzania.
Unpublished. Available from: <http://www.cepf.net>. Last
revised 21 October 2003.
Government of Tanzania, 2004. Catchment Values Report. Forest
and Beekeeping Division of the Ministry of Natural Resources
and Tourism, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Grimshaw, J.M., Cordeiro, N.J., Foley, C.A.H., 1995. The mammals
of Kilimanjaro. Journal of East African Natural History 84,
105–139.
Grubb, P., Butynski, T.M., Oates, J.F., Bearder, S.K., Disotell, T.R.,
Groves, C.P., Struhsaker, T.T., 2003. Assessment of the diversity
of African primates. International Journal of Primatology 24,
1301–1357.
Hochkirch, A., 1998. A comparison of the grasshopper fauna
(Orthoptera:Acridoidea) of the Uluguru Mountains and the
East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. Journal of East African
Natural History 87, 221–232.
Hoffman, R.L., 1993. Biogeography of East African montane forest
millipedes. In: Lovett, J.C., Wasser, S.K. (Eds.), Biogeography
228 BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231
and Ecology of the Rain Forests of Eastern Africa. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 103–115.
Honess, P.E., Bearder, S., 1996. Descriptions of the dwarf galago
species of Tanzania. African Primates 2, 75–79.
Howell, K.M., 1993. Herpetofauna of the eastern African forests.
In: Lovett, J.C., Wasser, S.K. (Eds.), Biogeography and Ecology of
the Rain Forests of Eastern Africa. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK, pp. 173–201.
ICBP, 1992. Putting Biodiversity on the Map: Priority Areas for
Global Conservation. ICBP, Cambridge.
Iversen, S.T., 1991. The Usambara mountains, NE Tanzania:
phytogeography of the vascular plant flora. Symbolae
Botanicae Upsaliensis 29 (3).
Jetz, W., Rahbek, C., Colwell, R.K., 2004. The coincidence of rarity
and richness and the potential signature of history in centers
of endemism. Ecology Letters 7, 1180–1191.
Johansson, S., Sandy, R., 1996. Updated forest area information in
the Usambara Mountains. Working Paper 19, East Usambara
Catchment Forest Project, Tanga. Available from: <http://
www.easternarc.or.tz>.
Johansson, S.G., Cunneyworth, P., Doggart, N., Botterweg, R., 1998.
Biodiversity surveys in the East Usambara Mountains:
preliminary findings and management implications. Journal
of East African Natural History 87, 139–158.
Jones, T., Ehardt, C.L., Butynski, T.M., Davenport, T.R.B., Mpunga,
N.E., Machaga, S.J., De Luca, D.W., 2005. The highland
mangabey Lophocebus kipunji: a new species of African
monkey. Science 308, 1161–1164.
Kingdon, J., Howell, K.M., 2005. Mammals of the forests of eastern
Africa. In: Lovett, J.C., Wasser, S.K. (Eds.), Biogeography and
Ecology of the Rain Forests of Eastern Africa. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 229–243.
Lens, L., Van Dongen, S., Norris, K., Githiru, M., Matthysen, E.,
2002. Avian persistence in fragmented rainforest. Science 298,
1236–1238.
Lindqvist, C., Albert, V.A., 2001. A high elevation ancestry for the
Usambara Mountains and lowland populations of African
violets (Saintpaulia, Gesneriaceae). Systematics and Geography
of Plants 71, 37–44.
Loader, S.P., Mariaux, J., Poynton, J., 2003. Herpetofauna of the
Mahenge Mountains, Tanzania: a window on African
biogeography. African Zoology 39, 71–76.
Loader, S.P., Gower, D.J., Howell, K.M., Doggart, N., Ro
¨del, M.O.,
Clarke, B.T., de Sa
´, R.O., Cohen, B.L., Wilkinson, M., 2004.
Phylogenetic relationships of African Microhylid frogs inferred
from DNA sequences of mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal
rRNA genes. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 4, 227–235.
Lovett, J.C., 1985. Moist forests of Tanzania. Swara 8, 8–9.
Lovett, J.C., 1988. Endemism and affinities of the Tanzanian
montane forest flora. In: Goldblatt, P., Lowry, P.P. (Eds.),
Proceedings of the Eleventh Plenary Meeting of the
Association for the Taxonomic Study of Tropical Africa.
Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical
Garden, vol. 25, pp. 591–598.
Lovett, J.C., 1990. Classification and status of the moist forests of
Tanzania. Mitteilungen aus dem Institut fu
¨r Allgemeine
Botanik Hamburg 23a, 287–300.
Lovett, J.C., 1993. Eastern Arc moist forest flora. In: Lovett, J.C.,
Wasser, S.K. (Eds.), Biogeography and Ecology of the Rain
Forests of Eastern Africa. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK, pp. 33–57.
Lovett, J.C., 1998a. Botanical importance of the Eastern Arc.
Journal of East African Natural History 87, 59–74.
Lovett, J.C., 1998b. Eastern tropical African centre of endemism: a
candidate for World Heritage Status? Journal of East African
Natural History 87, 359–366.
Lovett, J.C., Friis, I., 1996. Some patterns of endemism in the
tropical north east and eastern African woody flora. In: van
der Maesen, L.J.G., van der Burgt, X.M., van Medenbach de
Rooy, J.M. (Eds.), The Biodiversity of African Plants.
Proceedings XIVth AETFAT Congress, 22–27 August 1994,
Wageningen, The Netherlands. Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Dordrecht, pp. 582–601.
Lovett, J.C., Moyer, D.C., 1992. A new nature reserve in the Eastern
Arc mountains, Tanzania. Oryx 26, 115–118.
Lovett, J.C., Norton, G.W., 1989. Afromontane rain forest on
Malundwe Hill, Mikumi National Park. Biological Conservation
48, 13–19.
Lovett, J.C., Po
´cs, T., 1993. Assessment of the condition of the
Catchment Forest Reserves, a botanical appraisal. Catchment
Forestry Report 93.3, Dar es Salaam, 300 pp. Available from:
<http://www.easternarc.or.tz>.
Lovett, J.C., Stuart, S.N., 2001. Avifauna and vegetation of the
Shume-Juniperus forest of the West Usambara mountains,
Tanzania. Scopus 21, 1–14.
Lovett, J.C., Wasser, S.K. (Eds.), 1993. Biogeography and Ecology of
the Rain Forests of Eastern Africa. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK.
Lovett, J.C., Clarke, G.P., Moore, R., Morrey, G., 2001.
Elevational distribution of restricted range forest tree taxa
in eastern Tanzania. Biodiversity and Conservation 10,
541–550.
Lovett, J.C., Marchant, R., Taplin, J., Ku
¨per, W., 2004. The oldest
rainforests in Africa: stability or resilience for survival and
diversity? In: Purvis, A., Gittleman, J.L., Brooks, T.M. (Eds.),
Phylogeny and Conservation. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK, pp. 198–229.
Martin, R.D., 2003. Combing the primate record. Nature 422,
388–391.
Masters, J.C., Anthony, N.M., de Wit, M.J., Mitchell, A., 2005.
Reconstructing the evolutionary history of the Lorisidae using
morphological, molecular, and geological data. American
Journal of Physical Anthropology 127, 465–480.
Matthee, C.A., Tilbury, C.R., Townsend, T., 2004. A phylogenetic
review of the African leaf chamaleons: genus Rhampholeon
(Chamaleonidae): the role of vicariance and climate change in
speciation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271,
1967–1975.
Mbilinyi, B., Kashaigili, J., 2005. A forest area baseline for the
Eastern Arc Mountains. Technical Report – Conservation and
Management of the Eastern Arc Mountain Forests, Forestry
and Beekeeping Division, Ministry of Natural Resources and
Tourism. Available from: <http://www.easternarc.or.tz>.
Menegon, M., Salvidio, S., 2005. Amphibian and reptile diversity in
the southern Uzungwa Scarp Forest Reserve, south-eastern
Tanzania. In: Huber, B.A., Sinclair, B.J., Lampe, K.-H. (Eds.),
African Biodiversity: Molecules, Organisms, Ecosystems.
Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Tropical
Biology, Museum Koenig, Bonn. Springer Verlag, pp. 205–212.
Menegon, M., Salvidio, S., Tilbury, C., 2002. A new dwarf
chameleon from the Udzungwa Mountains of Tanzania
(Squamata: Rhampholeon Gunther, 1874). Journal of
Herpetology 36, 51–57.
Menegon, M., Salvidio, S., Moyer, D.C., 2003. Reptiles and
amphibians of Nguu North Forest Reserve, Tanzania: first
contribution. African Herps News 36, 2–8.
Menegon, M., Salvidio, S., Loader, S., 2004. Five new species of
Nectophrynoides Noble 1926 (Amphibia Anura Bufonidae) from
the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania. Tropical Zoology 17,
97–121.
Mittermeier, R.A., Myers, N., Thompsen, J.B., da Fonseca, G.A.B.,
Olivieri, S., 1998. Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical
wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation
priorities. Conservation Biology 12, 516–520.
Moreau, R.E., 1966. The Bird Faunas of Africa and its Islands.
Academic Press, London.
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231 229
Moyer, D.C., 1992. Report on the natural resources consultancy for
the Udzungwa Forest Management Project Preparation
Mission. Annex 4. In Lovett, J.C. (Ed.), Udzungwa Forest
Management Project Identification Mission. 108 pp, plus 16
technical annexes. Forestry and Beekeeping Division, Ministry
of Tourism, Natural Resources and Environment and DANIDA,
Dar es Salaam.
Mu
¨ller, H., Measey, G.J., Loader, S.P., Malonza, P.K., 2005. A new
species of Boulengerula Tornier (Amphibia: Gymnophiona:
Caeciliidae) from an isolated mountain block of the Taita Hills,
Kenya. Zootaxa 1004, 37–50.
Mwihomeke, S.T., Msangi, T.H., Mabula, C.K., Ylha
¨isi, J., Mndeme,
K C.H., 1998. Traditionally protected forests and nature
conservation in the North Pare mountains and Handeni
district, Tanzania. Journal of East African Natural History 87,
279–290.
Myers, N., 1988. Threatened biotas: ‘‘hot spots’’ in tropical forests.
The Environmentalist 8, 187–208.
Myers, N., 1990. The biological challenge: extended hot-spots
analysis. The Environmentalist 10, 243–256.
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Da Fonseca, G.A.B.,
Kent, J., 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.
Nature 403, 853–858.
Newmark, W.D., 1998. Forest area, fragmentation, and loss in the
Eastern Arc Mountains: implications for the conservation of
biological diversity. Journal of East African Natural History 87,
29–36.
Newmark, W.D., 2002. Conserving biodiversity in East African
Forests: a study of the Eastern Arc Mountains. Ecological
Studies, vol. 155. Springer, Berlin Germany.
Nicholson, S.E., 1994. Recent rainfall fluctuations in Africa and
their relationships to past conditions over the continent. The
Holocene 4, 121–131.
Nussbaum, R.A., 1985. Systematics of Caecilians (Amphibia:
Gymnophiona) of the family Scolecomorphidae. Occasional
Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, vol.
713, pp. 1–49.
Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., 1998. The Global 200: a representation
approach to conserving the earth’s most biologically valuable
ecoregions. Conservation Biology 12, 502–515.
Owen, R.B., Crossley, R., Johnson, T.C., Tweddle, D., Kornfield, I.,
Davison, S., Eccles, D.H., Engstrom, D.E., 1990. Major low levels
of Lake Malawi and their implications for speciation rates in
cichlid fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London
Series B – Biological Sciences 240, 519–553.
Perkin, A., Bearder, S., Butynski, T.M., Agwanda, B., Bytebier, B.,
2003. The Taita mountain dwarf galago Galagoides sp: a new
primate for Kenya. Journal of East African Natural History 91,
1–13.
Po
´cs, T., 1976. Vegetation mapping in the Uluguru Mountains
(Tanzania, East Africa). Boissiera 24, 477–498.
Po
´cs, T., 1998. Bryophyte diversity along the Eastern Arc. Journal
of East African Natural History 87, 75–84.
Poynton, J.C., 1998. Introduction to amphibian. In: Schmidt, K.,
Noble, G.K. (Eds.), Contributions to the Herpetology of the
Belgium Congo. Society for the study of Amphibians and
Reptiles, pp. i–xvii.
Poynton, J.C., 1999. Distribution of amphibians in sub-
Saharan Africa, Madagascar, and Seychelles. In: Duellman,
W.D. (Ed.), Patterns of Distribution of Amphibians, a
Global Perspective. John Hopkins University Press,
Baltimore, pp. 483–539.
Poynton, J., 2003. A new giant species of Arthroleptis
(Amphibia:Anura) from the Rubeho Mountains, Tanzania.
African Journal of Herpetology 52, 107–112.
Poynton, J.C., Clarke, B.T., 1999. Two new species of Stephopaedes
(Anura:Bufonidae) from Tanzania, with a review of the genus.
African Journal of Herpetology 48, 1–14.
Poynton, J.C., Howell, K.M., Clarke, B.T., Lovett, J.C., 1998. A
critically endangered new species of Nectophrynoides
(Anura:Bufonidae) from the Kihansi Gorge, Udzungwa
Mountains, Tanzania. African Journal of Herpetology 47, 59–67.
Prell, W.L., Hutson, W.H., Williams, D.F., Be, A., Geitzenauer, K.,
Molfino, B., 1980. Surface circulation of the Indian Ocean
during the Last Glacial Maximum, approximately 18,000 yr BP.
Quaternary Research 14, 309–336.
Redhead, J.F., 1981. The Mazumbai Forest: an island of lower
montane rainforest in the West Usambaras. African Journal of
Ecology 19, 195–199.
Rodgers, W.A., Homewood, K.M., 1982a. Biological values and
conservation prospects for the forests and primate
populations of the Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania. Biological
Conservation 24, 285–304.
Rodgers, W.A., Homewood, K.M., 1982b. Species richness and
endemism in the Usambara mountains forests, Tanzania.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 18, 197–242.
Romdal, T., 2001a. An ornithological survey of the Nguru
Mountains, Tanzania. Scopus 22, 49–62.
Romdal, T., 2001b. Altitudinal distribution and abundance
patterns of bird species in the Eastern Arc Mountains,
Tanzania. Scopus 21, 35–54.
Rosenzweig, M.L., 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Rovero, F., Jones, T., Sanderson, J., 2005. Notes on Abbott’s duiker
(Cephalophus spadix True 1890) and other forest antelopes of
Mwanihana Forest, Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania, as
revealed by camera-trapping and direct observations. Tropical
Zoology 18, 13–23.
Roy, M.S., 1997. Recent diversification in African greenbuls
(Pycnonotidae: Andropadus) supports a montane speciation
model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 264,
1337–1344.
Roy, M.S., da Silva, J.C., Arctander, P., Garcia-Moreno, J., Fjeldsa
˚,J.,
1997. The role of montane regions in the speciation of South
American and African birds. In: Mindell, D.P. (Ed.), Avian
Molecular Evolution and Systematics. Academic Press, pp.
325–343.
Salvidio, S., Menegon, M., Sindaco, R., Moyer, D.C., 2004. A new
species of elongate seps from Udzungwa grasslands, southern
Tanzania (Reptilia, Gerrhosauridae, Tetradactylus Merrem,
1820). Amphibia–Reptilia 25, 19–27.
Scharff, N., 1992. The linyphiid fauna of eastern Africa
(Araneae:Linyphiidae)—distribution patterns, diversity and
endemism. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society of London
45, 117–154.
Scharff, N., Stoltze, M., Jensen, F.P., 1981. The Uluguru Mountains,
Tanzania: Report of a Study-Tour, 1981. Zoological Museum of
the University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.
Schiøtz, A., 1999. The Treefrogs of Africa. Chimaira, Frankfurt.
Seddon, N., Capper, D.R., Ekstrom, J.M., Isherwood, I.S., Muna, R.,
Pople, R.G., Tarimo E., Timothy, J., 1995. Project Mount Nilo’95:
a bird conservation project to the East Usambara and Nguu
Mountains, northern Tanzania. Cambridge University
Expedition Reports, Cambridge.
Seddon, N., Capper, D.R., Ekstrom, J.M., Isherwood, I.S., Muna, R.,
Pople, R.G., Tarimo, E., Timothy, J., 1999a. The importance of
Nilo and Nguu North Forest Reserves for the conservation of
montane forest birds in Tanzania. Biological Conservation 87,
59–72.
Seddon, N., Capper, D.R., Ekstrom, J.M., Isherwood, I.S., Muna, R.,
Pople, R.G., Tarimo, E., Timothy, J., 1999b. Notes on the ecology
and conservation status of key bird species in Nilo and Nguu
Forest Reserves, Tanzania. Bird Conservation International 9,
9–28.
Spawls, S., Howell, K., Drewes, R., Ashe, J., 2001. A Field Guide to
the Reptiles of East Africa. Academic Press, London.
230 BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231
Stanley, W.T., Hutterer, R., 2000. A new species of Myosorex Gray,
1832 (Mammalia: Soricidae) from the Eastern Arc mountains,
Tanzania. Bonner Zoologische Beitraege 49, 19–29.
Stanley, W.T., Olson, L.E., 2005. Phylogeny, phylogeography, and
geographic variation of Sylvisorex howelli (Family Soricidae), an
endemic shrew of the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania.
Journal of Zoology 266, 341–354.
Stanley, W.T., Goodman, S.M., Hutterer, R., 1996. Notes on the
insectivores and elephant shrews of the Chome Forest, South
Pare Mountains, Tanzania (Mammalia: Insectivora et
Macroscelidae). Zoologische Abhandlungen Staatliches
Museum fu
¨r Tierkunde Dresden 49, 131–147.
Stanley, W.T., Kihaule, P.M., Howell, K.M., Hutterer, R., 1998a.
Small mammals of the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania.
Journal of East African Natural History 87, 91–100.
Stanley, W.T., Goodman, S.M., Kihaule, P.H., 1998b. Results of two
surveys of rodents in the Chome Forest Reserve, South Pare
Mountains, Tanzania. Zoologische Abhandlungen Staatliches
Museum fu
¨r Tierkunde Dresden 50, 145–160.
Stanley, W.T., Rogers, M.A., Hutterer, R., 2005a. A new species of
Congosorex from the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania, with
significant biogeographical implications. Journal of Zoology
265.
Stanley, W.T., Gunn, J., Kihaule, P.M., 2005b. Results of a
preliminary small mammal survey of Malundwe Mountain,
Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. Journal of East African
Natural History 94, 213–222.
Stattersfield, A.J., Crosby, M.J., Long, A.J., Wege, D.C., 1998.
Endemic Bird Areas of the World. Priorities for Biodiversity
Conservation. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 7, BirdLife
International, Cambridge, UK.
Svendsen, J.O., Hansen, L.A. (Eds.), 1995. Report on the Uluguru
Biodiversity Survey, 1993. The Royal Society for the Protection
of Birds, Danish Centre for Tropical Biodiversity and Tanzania
Forestry Research Institute, Sandy. Available from: <http://
www.easternarc.or.tz>.
Tetlow, S.L., 1987. Cambridge Conservation Study 1985 Taita Hills,
Kenya. ICBP Study Report No. 18. International Council for Bird
Preservation, Cambridge.
Trauth, M.H., Maslin, M.A., Deino, A., Strecker, M.R., 2005. Late
cenozoic moisture history of East Africa. Science 309, 2051–
2053.
White, F., 1983. The vegetation of Africa, a descriptive memoir to
accompany the UNESCO/AETFAT/UNSO Vegetation Map of
Africa (3 Plates, Northwestern Africa, Northeastern Africa, and
Southern Africa, 1:5,000,000). United Nations Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris, France.
Wilkinson, M., Loader, S.P., Gower, D.G., Sheps, J.A., Cohen, B.L.,
2002. Phylogenetic relationships of African Caecilians
(Amphibia:Gymnophiona): insights from mitochondrial rRNA
gene sequences. African Journal of Herpetology 52, 83–92.
Ylha
¨isi, J., 2004. Indigenous forests fragmentation and the
significance of ethnic forests for conservation in the North Pare,
the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania. Fennia 182, 109–132.
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 134 (2007) 209231 231
... Tanzania is the home of the diverse land covers, with forests and wooded areas covering over a million hectares of land (Fred Nzunda 2021;Howell et al. 2006). However, despite the conservation efforts in the country, forests are still under degradation pressure. ...
... Together, they harbour at least 1,500 endemic plant species, as well as unique mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians. Out of these, 333 species are globally threatened (Gereau et al. 2016;Howell et al. 2006). Agricultural encroachment, timber extraction, and charcoal production are reported to be the major threats causing fragmented habitats in these areas. ...
Article
Full-text available
Attaining conservation of forests and wildlife resources has been challenging all over the world. The loss of forest cover is among the major threat to biodiversity conservation and is termed a global challenges. Regardless of the intensity of the problem, there is a scarcity of studies examining the conservation threats caused by communities in relation to demographic factors, conservation related challenges facing communities adjacent to the forest, attitudes of the communities towards conservation, and conservation initiatives practiced by the communities adjacent to the Jozani Chakwa Bay National Park (JCBNP). This study used questionnaires, focused group discussions and field observations to bridge this gap. The results indicated different anthropogenic threats reported by communities adjacent to the JCBNP to vary significantly at Cochran’s Q test (4) = 167.822, p < 0.001of which firewood collection and charcoal burning were the leading. The level of education of the respondents found to have a significant (x²(3) = 8.597, p = 0.035) contribution on the use of alternative sources of energy. The occupation of the respondents varied significantly, with most of them (40%) engaging in agriculture. Crop damages reported to be a significant threat at x²(2) = 13.6, p = 0.002 with maize (66%) being highly damaged. Among the problem animals Procolobus kirkii was reported to be the leading. The communities were also found to have a positive attitude towards conservation and were directly involved in conservation related activities. More investment in community education, creating conservation awareness, and the use of alternative crops are recommended for attaining sustainable conservation of forest resources and community development objectives.
... The taxon laterimaculatus is now considered as a distinct species (Spawls & Rotrich 1997[erroneously based on Pasteur (1995]; Spawls et al. 2002Spawls et al. , 2018Röll et al. 2010;Röll 2013;Gippner et al. 2021). The taxon ulugurensis is treated either as a species (e.g., Spawls et al. 2002;Broadley & Howell 2000;Burgess et al. 2007;Röll et al. 2010) or as a subspecies (e.g., Broadley & Howell 1991;Spawls et al. 2018). ...
Article
The genus Lygodactylus Gray is a species-rich group of small, diurnal geckos distributed in Africa, Madagascar, and South America. The genus is divided into several species groups based on morphological characters, biogeographical affinities and/or phylogenetic investigations. To date, some of these groups still contain candidate species. One of these candidate species, provisionally designed as L. sp. B (a single female from Cameroon), had been placed phylogenetically within the East African Lygodactylus scheffleri-group. Furthermore, it shares typical scale characters with all members of this group. However, L. fischeri Boulenger, eponym and member of the West/Central African L. fischeri-group, also shares these scale characters with the L. scheffleri-group and with L. sp. B. While it could be ruled out that L. sp. B was conspecific with any member of the L. scheffleri-group, it could not be ruled out that L. sp. B represents a female of L. fischeri, as there is no female type material nor a clear description of a female of L. fischeri. Only when a male of this taxon was discovered in Cabinda (Angola) in a case of barcoding, the problem could be solved. We here describe the female L. sp. B from Cameroon and the male from Cabinda as new species Lygodactylus lobeke sp. nov. It is a small nondescript species without any bold color markings, such as dark blotches above the shoulder and on the flanks, which mark the male L. fischeri. The male and the female do not differ in coloration. In captivity, the female showed distinct 'mood dependent' colorations, including a 'pyjamas' coloration. For phylogenetic analysis, only sequences of L. laterimaculatus Pasteur, L. gravis Pasteur and L. lobeke sp. nov. were available. Lygodactylus lobeke sp. nov. was recovered as an independent clade which differs greatly in 16S uncorrected pairwise distance (>10%) from these two congeners. The new species is known from two localities in the Lower Guinea rainforests, with a linear distance of about 850 km. Despite this great distance, both specimens of L. lobeke sp. nov. are genetically surprisingly similar (3.5%). Presumably, the species has a wide distribution within the Lower Guinea region and a continuous gene flow within the population.
... This moisture, originating from the Indian Ocean, interacts with the rising hills, leading to mist and cloud precipitation throughout the year (Pellikka et al., 2013). The Taita Hills form part of the Eastern Arc Mountains (EAM), a mountain chain stretching from Eastern Tanzania to Southern Kenya, renowned for its biodiversity and numerous endemic species (Burgess et al., 2007). Despite the ecological significance, the Taita Hills have experienced significant forest loss, with up to 50% of indigenous forest areas disappearing between 1955 and 2004 due to agricultural expansion and human population growth. ...
Article
Full-text available
Tropical montane forests are vital ecosystems globally, preserving biodiversity, carbon stocks, and capturing moisture. We employed two airborne laser scanning (ALS) data sets to study changes in montane forest canopy heights in the Taita Hills, Kenya between 2014/2015 and 2022. We studied two forests, Ngangao (129 ha) and Yale (57 ha), which encompassed both indigenous montane forest and exotic plantations. First, forest types were mapped using field observations and aerial imagery, and then, canopy height changes were analysed using canopy height models at spatial resolution (i.e. the cell size) ranging from 1 m to 20 m. The results revealed overall increase in canopy height in the studied forests, with considerable spatial variation between the forest segments and main tree species. Planted exotic tree species, particularly eucalyptus but also pine and cypress, exhibited faster growth rates than native tree species. Point density differences between the ALS data sets can cause bias to estimation of canopy height changes. However, we observed that reducing the cell size of the canopy height models from 1 m to 10 m and 20 m, decreased the positive trend between point density difference and overestimation of canopy height change due to higher point density of more recent ALS data set. These findings contribute to our understanding on spatial complexity of montane forest ecosystems dynamics and help informing forest monitoring and development of management strategies for fragmented forests in montane regions.
... The biodiversity hotspots are notable for their extremely high levels of species richness and endemism (Kier et al., 2009;Mittermeier et al., 2004). The Eastern Afromontane Biodiversity Hotspot (EABH) is one such area, which supports an array of endemic species (Ales & Romportl, 2017;Burgess et al., 2004), including many vertebrate groups (Burgess et al., 2007;Davenport et al., 2013;Dinesen et al., 2001). The EABH stretches from Saudi Arabia and Yemen in the Middle East to Mozambique and Zimbabwe in southern Africa, forming a discontinuous chain of mountain ranges (Ebinger et al., 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
There is increasing evidence that the Ethiopian highlands have functioned as a long-term refugium for many montane taxa. They also served as a source of colonization for other mountain blocks in eastern Africa during warm and humid Plio-Pleistocene episodes. The climbing mice (Dendromus) are widely distributed in grassy habitats across most African mountain regions, making them a suitable model to investigate how climate and topography have impacted the evolution of diversity in the Eastern Afromontane Biodiversity Hotspot. A recent phylogenetic study based mostly on mitochondrial DNA sequences identified a monophyletic Dendromus clade that grouped all known Ethiopian taxa plus two lineages outside Ethiopia. However, the species limits in this group, phylogenetic relationships, and biogeography remained unresolved. Here, we analyse the genomic variability at thousands of double-digest restriction-site-associated DNA (ddRAD) loci, sequences of the mitochondrial gene for cytochrome b, and morphological data from all major phylogenetic lineages in this clade, sampled from across their known distribution ranges, with an aim to delimit species and assess their distribution and evolutionary history. Both nuclear and mitochondrial phylogenies provide congruent results, i.e. the presence of seven well-supported major lineages (putative species), which are morphologically and ecologically distinguishable. We also provide a taxonomic revision (including sequencing of the mitogenome of the holotype of D. mystacalis) that resulted in the re-description of D. mystacalis, the description of two new species, and the resurrection of one species from synonymy. The most likely evolutionary scenario included a radiation in the Ethiopian highlands, followed by an “out-of-Ethiopia” dispersal event of a montane lineage, leading to the colonization of Imatong Mts. and Mt. Kilimanjaro.
... Changes in species compositions between these two forest categories (Eastern Arc and Coastal) occur in transition zones which vary with latitude (Poynton and Boycott 1996). Some forests in Tanzania show a continuum from Coastal to Eastern Arc Mountains forest, effectively representing two biogeographical regions in one (Lovett 1990;Clarke and Dickinson 1995;Svendsen and Hansen 1995;Burgess et al. 2007;Lovett and Wasser 2008). ...
Article
Full-text available
The Eastern Arc Mountains (EAM) and Coastal forests of Tanzania are renowned for harboring large number of threatened and endemic vertebrate species, yet most of these areas have been partially studied. The Kimboza Nature Forest Reserve (KNFR) is a small forest which is in transition between the EAM and Coastal forests, and among the poorly surveyed areas for amphibians and reptiles. We conducted systematic surveys across the KNFR in 2012 and between 2020 and 2023 using a range of approaches with the aim of establishing a comprehensive and updated list of reptile and amphibian species and assess the contribution of EAM and Coastal forests to the KNFR's herpetofauna. We identified 77 species, 29 amphibians and 48 reptiles, substantially updating previous species lists. Three of these species (Kinyongia magomberae, Trachylepis boulengeri and Philothamnus macrops) represent range extensions from previously known ranges. Fourteen species are endemic to East Africa, 11 of them being restricted to Tanzania. These results make the KNFR the richest forest reserve for herpetofauna per square km in Tanzania, and most similar in its composition to the Coastal, rather than Eastern Arc forests. With the caveats concerning taxonomic uncertainties and the inequalities of sampling intensity across the region, this study shows that the KNFR is an important area that deserves conservation attention. The KNFR, like other Coastal forests, is under significant pressure from anthropogenic activities whi