ArticlePDF Available

A case series of domestic pressure cooker burns

Authors:
49
Vol. 57, No. 1, March 2012
Research letters
Introduction
Sri Lankans use kerosene oil, liquid petroleum (LP)
gas and firewood for domestic cooking. Firewood is
commonly used in rural areas. Urban and city dwellers
use LP gas and electric appliances for cooking, though
use of kerosene oil and firewood is not uncommon.
Domestic pressure cookers are used as an occasional
cooking utensil for special food items. Injuries related to
domestic pressure cooker burns are limited to case reports
[1,2].
Case reports
During a period of 5 months from April 2010 to August
2010 there were 7 casualty admissions (5 females and 2
males) with domestic pressure cooker burns. All were
direct admissions from Colombo district. There were 2
steam burns and 5 scalds due to contact with hot water.
Though everyone had irrigation with water soon after the
accident, the duration was not adequate.
One patient refused inward treatment and others were
admitted for observation. All patients were irrigated with
running tap water for not less than 20 minutes. All had
facial burns and three got anterior neck burns. All burns
were superficial and superficial partial thickness burns,
with burn surface area of less than 1% to 4%.
Everyone was treated with application of 5%
povidone iodine ointment and liquid paraffin mixture over
burn wounds, starting from first day. None had involvement
of eyes or ears.
Patients were sent home after wound debridement.
Facial hair was trimmed or shaved and povidone iodine
and paraffin local application continued for 5 times a day
until healing completed. Open technique was used to
manage all burns.
Healing was complete by the 10th post burn day in
all patients. As there were no signs of infection, no
systemic antibiotics were used in any of the patients [3,4].
None had scarring or contractures, but developed
To the Editors:
A case series of domestic pressure cooker burns
Ceylon Medical Journal 2012; 57: 49
hyperpigmentation. Patients were convinced on the value
of avoiding sun exposure for a period of 3 months and
application of isotretinoin cream. Hyperpigmentation
improved gradually with topical therapy over a period of 3
months.
Discussion
Burns associated with the use of domestic pressure
cookers appear to be rising. Therefore advice regarding
the proper cooking technique is important for their
prevention. All seven patients were burnt due to premature
opening of the lid of the pressure cooker. The lid of the
pressure cooker should not be removed until the pressure
inside has been released completely. Trying to remove
the lid with force is not advisable as that indicates
presence of raised pressure inside the appliance. There
are 3 ways to release pressure. “Natural release method”
allows cooling over a period of 10 -20 minutes. “Manually
released method” using a pressure regulator is quicker
than the natural release method. “Cold water release
method” is the quickest and this includes taking the cooker
to a sink and irrigating with water. This method is not
recommended as it can cause contact burns.
Although there is no escape of steam once the
pressure is completely released, it is advisable not to keep
the face over the lid when opening it. Novices should take
special care as they are more prone for pressure cooker
related burns.
References
1. Gundeslioglu AO, Yenidunya MO. Burn and mandibular
fracture due to pressure cooker explosion. Journal of
Craniofacial Surgery 2010; 21: 1631-3.
2. Sandhir RK, Sandhir M. Accidental pressure cooker lid blow-
out. Burns 1992; 18: 438.
3. Leon-Villapalos J, Jeschke MG, Horndon DN. Topical
management of facial burns. Burns 2008; 34: 903-9.
4. Ravat F, Le-Floch R, Vinsonneau C, et al. Antibiotics and
the burn patient. Burns 2011; 37: 16-26.
V A Perera1, K Karunadasa1, C Perera1
1Burns and Plastic Reconstruction Surgical Unit, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo.
Correspondence: VAP, e-mail: <vaperera@yahoo.com>. Received 28 April and revised version accepted 22 October
2011. Competing interests: none declared.
... Blast injuries cause injury either by physical trauma, chemical trauma or by blast waves. In the medical literature, accidental injury due to pressure cookers address mostly chemical injuries and burns [3,4] , ocular trauma [5][6][7] or transorbital craniocerebral penetrating injuries [3] . Pressure cookers have a metal interlocking lid to withstand great pressures, and a rubber lining to keep contents airtight. ...
... This cannot be called an actual combustion, but is a brisk, almost instantaneous expansion of gases. The steam so released can cause extensive burns and scalds [4,8] . The cooker can be blown apart by expanding gases and shrapnel so generated may hit the subject standing within reach to cause fractures , blunt or penetrating trauma to the head, eye and rarely to the brain as has been reported previously [3,[5][6][7][8] . ...
... These incidents mostly occur either due to improper use of the device or faulty apparatus. The use of pressure cooker in kitchen is associated with unintentional injuries that mostly include pressure cooker burns, [3][4][5] accidental explosion during household cooking however is rarely reported. 5,6 The pressure cooker is an integral part of every Nepalese kitchen. ...
... Most of the literature on the pressure cooker related injuries describes the pressure cooker burns except for a case where burns were accompanied by fracture of mandible and in another that resulted in serious ocular trauma caused by the nozzle of the pressure cooker lid. [3][4][5][6] In a related series of boilers and pressure vessels accidents in Hong Kong, it was concluded that the associated morbidity and mortality could be the result of ignored safety procedures for operation and maintenance of pressure equipment. 7 In this series, among the cases involving pressure cookers; the pressure inside the cookers was estimated to be over 450 kPa that is sufficiently enough to cause devastation. ...
Article
Full-text available
Pressure cooker is an integral part of Asian kitchen, and is frequently used in Nepal. Steam under pressure generated while cooking has high boiling point and great penetrating power. The use of pressure cooker in kitchen is associated with unintentional injuries that mostly include pressure cooker burns. In rare instances the pressure cooker may accidently explode and may cause serious injuries. The same mechanism is used in making explosive device for mass homicides. An unusual case of penetrating facial injury sustained in a pressure cooker explosion in a domestic setting is reported along with a brief review of literature on pressure cooker explosions.
... Accidental injury from such a commonly used utensil can sometimes be grievous. Most of the reports of injuries from PCs concern burns due to sudden opening of the lid and releasing of steam under very high pressure 1 . There is one previous report in which a mandible fracture occurred along with burns 2 and one in which brain damage occurred due to the cooker blast 3 . ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: There are a number of ways in which one can sustain a head injury. Even if you are doing simple household activities or going out for a morning walk, you cannot be sure of what type of injury awaits you. The source of injury may be a pressure cooker whistle acting as a projectile or a hailstone falling from the sky. Such injuries are common in Nepal, considering the socio-demographic and geographic conditions. In this article, we present two such very rare cases of head injury. Case Reports: The first case is a middle-aged woman who sustained an accidental injury to the face associated with fracture of frontal sinus and frontal contusion, following the impact from a high momentum projectile in the form of the pressure regulator of a pressure cooker. She underwent craniotomy and removal of the foreign body. In the second case, an elderly man sustained minor injury to the head following the fall of hail. The abrasions and contusions produced by the hail were managed conservatively. Since he did not have any clinical evidence of head injury, other than multiple abrasions with contusions in the scalp, he did not undergo any imaging studies. He did not have any neurological deficits. The postoperative period was uneventful for the first patient and she was followed up for one month. The second patient was lost to follow-up. Conclusion: Successful management of two very rare cases of head injuries from Nepal are reported. Proper care and maintenance of the house-hold utensils that are constantly used may protect people from head injuries. Though natural calamities cannot always be avoided, simple measures like using an umbrella while going outdoors may protect individuals from head injuries due to hailstones.
... Domestic pressure related injuries are less commonly reported in literature with sporadic case reports. (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8) We report a rare case of a one year old child who sustained traumatic brain injury due to pressure cooker explosion and mechanism, pathophysiology and management of such injuries. ...
Article
Full-text available
Traumatic brain injury is a common condition in the emergency services, affecting the pediatric and adult population significantly. Patterns of head injury as well as management principles in children are important differences compared to adults. Traumatic brain injury by Domestic pressure cooker is rare and has not been described in children, which to our knowledge is the first report in the literature of this nature.
Article
Objective To determine the incidence of pressure cooker related injuries in US hospital emergency departments. To quantify injury patterns associated with pressure cookers and inform prevention recommendation messaging. Methods The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) was queried to identify injuries associated with pressure cookers between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2019. Case narratives were reviewed to identify precipitating or contributing factors of pressure cooker related injuries. Negative binomial regression was employed to test for trends over time. Results The NEISS query identified 759 actual pressure cooker injuries between 2003 and 2019, yielding a national estimate of 28 337 (95% CI 24 588 to 32,086) injuries treated in US emergency departments, 1667 cases annually. Analysis of case narratives resulted in the identification of four predominant precipitating or contributing factors to injury: burning agent, struck by product, injured while opening and other. Conclusion NEISS is a valuable tool for determining injury incidence and understanding common injury patterns associated with specific products. Consumers and manufacturers of pressure cookers can develop safety strategies targeted at preventing the product’s main injury risks.
Article
Full-text available
Domestic pressure cooker trauma leading to severe ocular injuries is generally underreported. It can have varying manifestations ranging from penetrating ocular injury to thermal burns. We report a case of pressure cooker explosion presenting as autoevisceration in one eye and thermal burn in the other eye. This case highlights the importance of the need to increase awareness and promote safety measures to help prevent such accidents.
Article
Full-text available
Background: There are a number of ways in which one can sustain a head injury. Even if you are doing simple household activities or going out for a morning walk, you cannot be sure of what type of injury awaits you. The source of injury may be a pressure cooker whistle acting as a projectile or a hailstone falling from the sky. Such injuries are common in Nepal, considering the socio-demographic and geographic conditions. In this article, we present two such very rare cases of head injury. Case Reports: The first case is a middle-aged woman who sustained an accidental injury to the face associated with fracture of frontal sinus and frontal contusion, following the impact from a high momentum projectile in the form of the pressure regulator of a pressure cooker. She underwent craniotomy and removal of the foreign body. In the second case, an elderly man sustained minor injury to the head following the fall of hail. The abrasions and contusions produced by the hail were managed conservatively. Since he did not have any clinical evidence of head injury, other than multiple abrasions with contusions in the scalp, he did not undergo any imaging studies. He did not have any neurological deficits. The postoperative period was uneventful for the first patient and she was followed up for one month. The second patient was lost to follow-up. Conclusion: Successful management of two very rare cases of head injuries from Nepal are reported. Proper care and maintenance of the house-hold utensils that are constantly used may protect people from head injuries. Though natural calamities cannot always be avoided, simple measures like using an umbrella while going outdoors may protect individuals from head injuries due to hailstones.
Article
A burn case of 42-year-old female patient due to pressure cooker explosion associated with mandibular fracture is presented. After early tangential excision of the deep second- and third-degree-burn areas, a split-thickness skin grafting was applied. Open reduction and internal fixation therapy with miniplate system were done for linear symphysis fracture. As much as we know, there was no report in the literature about pressure-cooking burn accompanying mandibular fracture.
Article
Infection is a major problem in burn care and especially when it is due to bacteria with hospital-acquired multi-resistance to antibiotics. Moreover, when these bacteria are Gram-negative organisms, the most effective molecules are 20 years old and there is little hope of any new product available even in the distant future. Therefore, it is obvious that currently available antibiotics should not be misused. With this aim in mind, the following review was conducted by a group of experts from the French Society for Burn Injuries (SFETB). It examined key points addressing the management of antibiotics for burn patients: when to use or not, time of onset, bactericidia, combination, adaptation, de-escalation, treatment duration and regimen based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of these compounds. The authors also considered antibioprophylaxis and some other key points such as: infection diagnosis criteria, bacterial inoculae and local treatment. French guidelines for the use of antibiotics in burn patients have been designed up from this work.
Article
The face is the central point of the physical features of the human being. It transmits expressions and emotions, communicates feelings and allows for individual identity. It contains complex musculature and a pliable and unique skin envelope that reacts to the environment through a vast network of nerve endings. The face hosts vital areas that make phonation, feeding, and vision possible. Facial burns disrupt these anatomical and functional structures creating pain, deformity, swelling, and contractures that may lead to lasting physical and psychological sequelae. The management of facial burns may include operative and non-operative treatment or both, depending on the depth and extent of the burn. This paper intends to provide a review of the available options for topical management of facial burns. Topical agents will be defined as any agent applied to the surface of the skin that alters the outcome of the facial burn. Therefore, the classic concept of topical therapy will be expanded and developed within two major stages: acute and rehabilitation. Comparison of the effectiveness of the different treatments and relevant literature will be discussed.
Topical management of facial burns
  • J Leon-Villapalos
  • M G Jeschke
  • D N Horndon
Leon-Villapalos J, Jeschke MG, Horndon DN. Topical management of facial burns. Burns 2008; 34: 903-9.