Pelvic Floor Symptoms Improve Similarly After Pessary and Behavioral Treatment for Stress Incontinence

Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Urology, Loyola University Chicago, IL, USA.
Journal of Pelvic Medicine and Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.09). 03/2012; 18(2):118-21. DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31824a021d
Source: PubMed


The objective of this study was to determine if differences exist in pelvic symptom distress and impact on women randomized to pessary versus behavioral therapy for treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Change in symptom and condition-specific health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures were compared between pessary and behavioral groups 3 months after randomization in the Ambulatory Treatments for Leakage Associated With Stress Incontinence trial. Four hundred forty-six women with symptoms of SUI were randomized to continence pessary, behavioral therapy (pelvic floor muscle training and continence strategies) or combination therapy. Validated measures utilized included urinary, prolapse, and colorectal scales of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory; urinary, prolapse, and colorectal scales of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire; and Stress and Urge scales of the Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis. Student t test and analysis of variance were used to compare scores within and between groups.
Mean age of participants was 49.8 (SD, 11.9) years; 84% were white, and 10% were African American. One hundred forty-nine were randomized to pessary, and 146 to behavioral therapy. Baseline symptoms and HRQOL scores were significantly reduced within treatment arms at 3 months after randomization, but there was no statistically significant difference between groups.
There was no difference in pelvic floor symptom bother and HRQOL between the pessary and behavioral therapy arms in women undergoing conservative treatment for SUI. Individualized preference issues should be considered in the approach to the nonsurgical treatment of SUI.

Download full-text


Available from: David D Rahn
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To determine the muscles comprising the minimal levator hiatus. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA. POPULATION: Eight female fresh frozen pelves and 80 nulliparouswomen. METHODS: Three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasound was performed in eight fresh frozen female pelves. The structures of the levator hiatus were tagged with needles and the cadavers were dissected to identify the tagged structures. A group of 80 nullipara underwent 3D endovaginal ultrasound, and the minimal levator hiatus area, puborectalis area, and anorectal angle were assessed, and normal values were obtained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anatomic borders of minimal levator hiatus and normality in pelvic floor measurements. RESULTS: The pubococcygeus forms the inner lateral border and anterior attachment of the minimal levator hiatus to the pubic bone. The puboanalis fibres are immediately lateral to pubococcygeus attachments. There are variable contributions of the puborectalis fibres lateral to the puboanalis attachment. The posterior border of the minimal levator hiatus is formed by the levator plate. Eighty community-dwelling nulliparous women underwent 3D endovaginal ultrasound. The median age was 47 years (range 22-70 years). The mean of minimal levator hiatus and puborectalis hiatus areas were 13.4 cm(2) (±1.89 cm(2) SD) and 14.8 cm(2) (±2.16 cm(2) SD). The mean anorectal and levator plate descent angles were 156° (±10.04° SD) and 15.9° (±8.28° SD). CONCLUSION: Anterior and lateral borders of the minimal levator hiatus are formed mostly by pubococcygeus. The puborectalis, pubococcygeus, and iliococcygeus form the bulk of the levator plate.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2012 · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Involuntary leakage of urine (urinary incontinence) affects women of all ages, particularly older women who live in residential care such as nursing homes. Some women leak urine during exercise or when they cough or sneeze (stress urinary incontinence) and this may occur as a result of weakness of the pelvic floor muscles such as damage during childbirth. Other women leak urine before going to the toilet when there is a sudden and compelling need to pass urine (urgency urinary incontinence) and this may be caused by involuntary contraction of the bladder muscle. Mixed urinary incontinence is the combination of both stress and urgency urinary incontinence. Pelvic floor muscle training is a supervised treatment and it involves muscle-clenching exercises to strengthen the pelvic floor muscles. It is a common treatment used by women to stop urine leakage. Other treatments are also available which can either be used alone or in combination with pelvic floor muscle training. In this review, the combination of pelvic floor muscle training with another active treatment was compared with the same active treatment alone for the treatment of all types of urine leakage. There was not enough evidence say whether or not the addition of pelvic floor muscle training to another active treatment results in more benefits when compared to the same active treatment alone. There was also insufficient evidence to evaluate the adverse events associated with the addition of PFMT to other active treatment.
    No preview · Article · Nov 2013 · Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online)
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common and bothersome problem for women. Sling surgery is the mainstay of surgical treatment of SUI. A review of PubMed literature using the following keywords was performed: stress urinary incontinence, women, sling, midurethral sling, mini-sling, outcomes, and complications. Literature within the last 10 years, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were given preference. Slings placed at the bladder neck and the midurethra each corrects a particular anatomic weakness, as described in the "hammock hypothesis" and the "integral theory," respectively. At present, the literature suggests that the autologous bladder neck sling (BNS) and retropubic midurethral sling (MUS) have similar success rates, while the retropubic MUS appears to be more successful than the transobturator approach. The literature supporting single-incision mini-sling (SIMS) is still in the early stages and data to support its use over another MUS is absent. Each approach is associated with unique complications and adverse outcomes. While both BNS and MUS are effective in improving SUI in women, the ultimate choice of material and approach should be based both on surgeon experience and patient preference. Detailed informed consent discussion prior to any sling surgery cannot be overemphasized.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2014 · Minerva medica
Show more