Linking the Activity Measure for Post Acute Care and the Quality of Life Outcomes in Neurological Disorders

Health and Disability Research Institute, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (Impact Factor: 2.57). 10/2011; 92(10 Suppl):S37-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.026
Source: PubMed


To use item response theory (IRT) methods to link physical functioning items in the Activity Measure for Post Acute Care (AM-PAC) and the Quality of Life Outcomes in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL).
Secondary data analysis of the physical functioning items of AM-PAC and Neuro-QOL. We used a nonequivalent group design with 36 core items common to both instruments and a test characteristic curve transformation method for linking AM-PAC and Neuro-QOL scores. Linking was conducted so that both raw and scaled AM-PAC and Neuro-QOL scores (mean ± SD converted-logit scores, 50 ± 10) could be compared.
AM-PAC items were administered to rehabilitation patients in post-acute care (PAC) settings. Neuro-QOL items were administered to a community sample of adults through the Internet.
PAC patients (N=1041) for the AM-PAC sample and community-dwelling adults (N=549) for the Neuro-QOL sample.
Not applicable.
Mobility (N=25) and activity of daily living (ADL) items (N=11) common to both instruments were included in analysis.
Neuro-QOL items were linked to the AM-PAC scale by using the generalized partial credit model. Mobility and ADL subscale scores from the 2 instruments were calibrated to the AM-PAC metric.
An IRT-based linking method placed AM-PAC and Neuro-QOL mobility and ADL scores on a common metric. This linking allowed estimation of AM-PAC mobility and ADL subscale scores based on Neuro-QOL mobility and ADL subscale scores and vice versa. The accuracy of these results should be validated in a future sample in which participants respond to both instruments.

Download full-text


Available from: David Cella, Feb 24, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This chapter describes an approach to the study of hemostasis in zebrafish. Hemostasis is a complex and highly regulated vertebrate process, reflecting its fundamental role in the response to injury. The zebrafish model represents a novel approach to the identification of the genes involved in this response. This model employs the power of saturation mutagenesis to screen for genes involved in vertebrate specific developmental functions. This chapter presents a review of the pathophysiology of the human system, rationale for development of the zebrafish model, present knowledge of fish hemostasis, and potential relevance to human hemostasis. Assays for characterization of the zebrafish hemostatic system and for screening hemostatic mutants have been described, with a discussion of potential further applications. The chapter emphasizes the relevance of the zebrafish model to the study of hemostasis. To provide the background for the discussion of the zebrafish system, it describes the major components of the mammalian hemostatic system.
    No preview · Article · Dec 1998 · Methods in cell biology
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe the development and calibration of the banks and scales of the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) project, commissioned by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke to develop a bilingual (English/Spanish), clinically relevant, and psychometrically robust health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) assessment tool. Classic and modern test construction methods were used, including input from essential stakeholder groups. An online patient panel testing service and 11 academic medical centers and clinics from across the United States and Puerto Rico that treat major neurologic disorders. Adult and pediatric patients representing different neurologic disorders specified in this study, proxy respondents for select conditions (stroke, pediatric conditions), and English- and Spanish-speaking participants from the general population. Not applicable. Multiple generic and condition-specific measures used to provide construct validity evidence for the new Neuro-QOL tool. Neuro-QOL has developed 14 generic item banks and 8 targeted scales to assess HRQOL in 5 adult (stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) and 2 pediatric conditions (epilepsy, muscular dystrophies). The Neuro-QOL system will continue to evolve, with validation efforts in clinical populations and new bank development in health domains not presently included. The potential for Neuro-QOL measures in rehabilitation research and clinical settings is discussed.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2011 · Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The articles in this supplement present recent advances in the measurement of patient-reported health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcomes. Specifically, these articles highlight the combined efforts of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Center on Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, and Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Service to improve HRQOL measurement. In addition, this supplement is intended to provide rehabilitation professionals with information about these efforts and the implications that these advances in outcomes measurement have for rehabilitation medicine and clinical practice. These new measurement scales use state-of-the-art method techniques, including item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. In addition, scale development involves both qualitative and quantitative methods, as well as the administration of items to hundreds or even thousands of research participants. The scales deliberately have been built with overlap of items between scales so that linkages and equivalency scores can be computed. Ultimately, these scales should facilitate direct comparison of outcomes instruments across studies and will serve as standard data elements across research trials without compromising the specificity of disease- or condition-targeted measures. This supplement includes the initial publications for many of these new measurement initiatives, each of which provides researchers and clinicians with better tools for evaluation of the efficacy of their interventions.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2011 · Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
Show more