ChapterPDF Available

Logistics and Supply Chains in Agriculture and Food

Logistics and
Supply Chains in Agriculture and Food
Girma Gebresenbet and Techane Bosona
Department of Energy and Technology,
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala
1. Introduction
During the recent two decades, goods flow has been tremendously increased, even though
the amount of goods remains at the steady state. Increased variety of goods, the just-in-time
delivery system, low load rate, specialization and centralization of production systems,
globalization of marketing and seasonal variations are among the main challenges of
logistics system which may lead to the necessity of developing effective logistics in the
sector. Effective logistics and technologies are a critical success factors for both
manufacturers and retailers (Brimer, 1995; Tarantilis et al., 2004). Effective logistics requires
delivering the right product, in the right quantity, in the right condition, to the right place, at
the right time, for the right cost (Aghazadeh, 2004) and it has a positive impact on the
success of the partners in the supply chain (Brimer, 1995).
Food chain logistics is a significant component within logistics system as a whole. The food
sector plays a significant role in economy being one of the main contributors to the GNP of
many countries, particularly in developing countries. According to the European
Commission (2010), the food and drink industry is one of Europe's most important and
dynamic industrial sectors consisting of more than 300,000 companies which provide jobs
for more than 4 million people.
The current trend in food value chain is characterized by three overriding features:
a. greater concentration of farms, food industries, and wholesalers into smaller number
with large sizes;
b. the evolution of integrated supply chains linking producers and other stakeholders;
c. ever increasing consumers demand for food quality and safety (food that is fresh,
palatable, nutritious and safe) and animal welfare (Opara, 2003). However, to date, the
linkage between logistics systems of the stakeholders in the agriculture and food supply
chains is rather loose and fragmented. Even within individual firms, the vertical and
internal integration as related to freight and logistics is loose, and therefore they are
both economically and environmentally inefficient and not sustainable. In this regard,
effective and efficient logistics will be a critical success factor for both producers and
Pathways to Supply Chain Excellence
In addition to the increase in transport of agricultural and related goods in the recent
decades, empty haulage is common in agricultural sector and the load capacity utilization
level of vehicles is very low (it varies between 10 and 95%) (Gebresenbet and Ljungberg,
2001). Therefore, efficient use of vehicles could be among the methods to reduce transport
work and attenuate negative environmental impact (Gebresenbet and Ljungberg, 2001).
Within the agri-food chain, meat chain became societal interest and area of attention by
researchers because of animal welfare, meat quality, and environmental issues as transport
and handling of slaughter animals are associated with a series of stressful events for
animals, compromising their welfare and meat quality. About 365 million farm animals (45
million cattle, 95 million sheep, 225 million pigs, and 300 000 horses) are transported per
year within the 15 member countries of the European Union (EU)
The resulting transport intensification leads to environmental degradation by contributing
to air pollution, global warming, ozone depletion, resource depletion, congestion and traffic
accidents, particularly in the densely populated areas. The aforementioned constraints in the
Agri-food chain necessitate the development of innovative logistics system taking into
consideration, road and traffic conditions, climate, transport time and distance, and queuing
at delivery points to:
strength the economic competitiveness of stakeholders in the food supply chain
maintain quality or adding value of food and improve animal welfare
attenuate environmental impact
The objective of this chapter is to highlight the logistics system in the Agri-food chain and
present case studies. In most of the case studies, mapping out the material flow;
investigating the possibilities and constraints of coordinated and integrated collection of
primary production and goods distribution; and investigating the food products and means
of production that supported by information technology were carried out. Optimization of
collection/distribution and the reduction in emissions from the vehicles as a result of
optimization are presented. It is assumed that the information achieved through this
investigation will assist to develop an effective transport-logistics system, which may enable
an efficient utilization of vehicles to meet the current demand for attenuating environmental
The main methodologies employed in the case studies that will be included in this chapter
include one or more of the following:
a. Mapping out goods flow through comprehensive field data collection using
questionnaires, interviews and measurements
b. Optimization including location analysis and route optimization
c. Coordination of distribution and demonstration
d. Clustering and integration
e. Modelling and simulation
f. Estimation of economic and environmental impact
The studies were carried out through interviews and literature studies, field measurements,
simulation and optimization. Data collection on daily distribution and collection including
geographical location of collections/distribution points and routes was done using the
Logistics and Supply Chains in Agriculture and Food
global positioning system (GPS) and geographical information system (GIS). Optimization
of distribution/collection centers and route optimization were done using the gathered data
and the software LogiX (DPS, 1996). Air emissions were calculated using the simulation
model developed earlier by Gebresenbet and Oostra (1997), where the following parameters
were considered: vehicle type, time (loading; unloading and idling), goods type, load
capacity utilization level, transport distance; vehicle speed, geographical position of depot
and delivery points, routes, and air emissions from vehicles.
In local food systems, the distribution infrastructure is partial, fragmented (Brewer et al.,
2001; Saltmarsh and Wakeman, 2004) and often inefficient, as in non-centralized
distribution, the share of the transportation cost per unit of the product is relatively high.
This is an area that offers great potential for improvement with potential benefits both to
suppliers and outlets. Case studies focused on local food systems, were carried and these
studies confirmed that coordination and logistics network integration in food supply chain
promote positive improvements in logistics efficiency, environmental impacts, traceability
of food quality, and the potential market for local food producers. Such improvement is
important as developing food product traceability systems has been a major challenge both
technically and economically (Wallgreen, 2006; Engelseth, 2009).
In the case of animal transport and abattoir system, the operations considered involve
loading, transporting and unloading animals and the slaughter chain from lairage box to
cooling room for cattle carcasses. Data collection was carried out through truck-driver
interviews; activity registration on routes and at delivery, and slaughter chain activity
registration. Time and distance of transport could be reduced through route optimisation.
The analysis of animal collection routes indicated potential for savings up to 20% in time, for
individual routes (Gebresenbet and Ljungberg 2001).
In this chapter, the concept and case study on clustering and network integration is
presented. In the case study, the locations of 90 producers and 20 delivery points were
displayed on maps using ArcMap of GIS software and based on geographical proximity, 14
clusters were formed. The clustering and logistics network integration approach could
provide an insight into the characteristics of fragmented supply chain and facilitate their
integration. It indicated positive improvements in logistics efficiency, environmental
impacts, traceability of food quality, and the potential market for local food producers.
2. Concept of logistics in agriculture and food supply chains
2.1 Logistics services in developed countries
The role of production and supply chain management is increasing worldwide due to the
growing consumer concerns over food safety and quality together with retailer demands for
large volumes of consistent and reliable product. In developed countries, product losses
(post harvest losses) are generally small during processing, storage and handling because of
the efficiency of the equipment, better storage facilities, and control of critical variables by a
skilled and trained staff. Recently, the concept of Agricultural and Food Logistics has been
under development as more effective and efficient management system is required for the
food production planning, physical collection of primary produce from fields and
homesteads, processing and storage at various levels, handling, packaging, and distribution
Pathways to Supply Chain Excellence
of final product. In the food supply chain many stakeholders such as farmers,
vendors/agents, wholesalers, rural retailers and suppliers and transporters are involved. At
all levels, information flow and management of produce is essential to maintain the food
quality throughout the chain (see Figure 1). The flow of input resources from farms to
consumers needs to be described in detail and the constraints in each sub-process needs to
be identified to develop appropriate solutions for logistics related problems.
Fig. 1. Material, capital and information flow between producers (farmers) and consumers
It is important to note that lack of packaging facilities may be one of the constraints in the
logistics system of small-scale farmers during the transition from subsistence to commercial
farming. Significant post-harvest losses occur when especially vulnerable crops and fruits
are subjected to mechanical damage (Ferris et al, 1993). Therefore management of packaging
should be taken into consideration in the development of agricultural logistic systems.
2.2 Logistics service in developing countries
The development of smallholder agriculture in developing countries is very sensitive to
transport strategies. Many isolated farmers have little opportunity to escape poverty, as
their potential marketing activities are hampered by inadequate or poor transport facilities.
The rural transport planning must address the needs of people, as much as possible at the
household level. Such well planed transport system enables smallholders make the
transition from subsistence to small-scale commercial farming. This helps them to harvest
and market crops more efficiently, reduces drudgery and, by facilitating communication,
helps stimulate social integration and improve quality of life. Availability of road
infrastructure (that includes feeder roads, tracks, and paths), storage facilities and transport
services increases mobility and encourages production (Gebresenbet and Oodally, 2005).
Typical transport activities of a small-scale farmer could be represented as in Figure 2. The
arrows show people mobility and goods flow to and from a homestead. Rural transport is
usually classified into on-farm and off-farm transport.
On-farm transportation includes:
a. transportation within fields
i. collecting harvested crops to one point for processing in the fields and temporary
ii. distribution of fertilizers and seeds;
iii. transporting of firewood, timber and
iv. water,
b. transport of agricultural products from fields to homesteads,
Logistics and Supply Chains in Agriculture and Food
c. transport of agricultural implements from homesteads to fields and vice-versa,
d. transport of seeds and fertilizers to the fields;
e. transport of implements between different plots etc.
Off-farm transportation includes:
a. transport of agricultural products including animals to local markets,
b. transportation to grinding mills
c. transport of industrial products (commercial fertilizers, implements, seeds, etc) from
markets to homesteads,
d. transportation to health centres and schools, religion centres, and
e. transportation to towns and bigger market
Fig. 2. Transport requirements for a typical small householder (Gebresenbet, 2001)
In agricultural systems of developing countries, animal power is used to replace human
power and facilitate transport tasks. Animals are used to pull carts or sledges and as pack
animals. At least ten species have been so domesticated, and their (absolute) capabilities
depend primarily on body size. In relative terms, pack animals can carry 12 to 30 % of their
body weight and can pull horizontally 40 to 60% of their body weight. These values depend
on species, but field observations have returned higher values, probably at some cost of
animals' well being.
Road side
Plot 2
Water source
Agric input
To and from grinding mill
Agric input
Plot 1
Nearest road
Pathways to Supply Chain Excellence
In rural agricultural transport, in developing countries, special emphasis should be on
collection, packaging, storage and distribution of agricultural primary products. Among the
urgent tasks that formulated by the 8th plenary meeting of General Assembly of United
Nation in June 1986, regarding transport and related infrastructure in developing countries,
were improving and expanding the storage capacity, distribution and the marketing system;
and development of transport and communications. Training of farmers (producers) may
reduce loss due to harvest and temporarily storage, while other stake holders (for examples
service providers) should take the responsibility to minimize loss. Loss in processing,
storage and handling is high because of poor facilities and frequently inadequate knowledge
of methods to care for the produce. Post-harvest losses run up to 40% varying from 15 to
25% on farm and 10 to 15% in trade. The high losses in developing countries represent not
only a severe economic loss for the regions but also a major loss of nutrients to already
malnourished populations (FAO, 1989).
The basic concept described in Figure 1 is also applicable for small-scale farmers in
developing countries. However, the challenges of rural transport may be promoting the
application of the concept of rural logistics (see Figure 1); developing rural infrastructure
(storage and packaging facilities, collection points and centres); developing efficient and
effective management of product and information flow; developing strategies to promote
best transport services. Some of the main issues that require immediate attention are:
encouragement of private entrepreneurs to take the responsibility of service provider in
storage, packaging and transport services; development of collection centre systems to
promote marketing possibilities by facilitating coordinated transport services. Constraints
associated with the flow and storage of produce and services in food and agribusiness exist
in developing countries include lack of adequate storage facilities and knowledge of
handling; poor processing, management and transport services.
In the absence of coordinated product delivery system, farmers themselves transport most
of the produce, either as head loading or using pack animals, to both nearby and long
distance markets. There are many constraints of such transport conditions: Amount of
produce that can be transported by head loading or pack animals is limited; Transport time
and distance is long; Drudgery on farmers; and Spoilage of produce during transport, etc.
These constraints may result in reducing production and marketing opportunities for
farmers, and consequently shortage of food for consumers. The reduction of spoilage and
damages that could improve the marketing value of the produce may necessitate the
availability of adequate processing, packaging and storage facilities and management for
each varieties of produce (Gebresenbet and Oodally, 2005).
3. Logistics in abattoir chains: Animal supply and meat distribution
From effective logistics management point of view, an integrated approach from farm-to-
table is required for effective control of food hazards which is a shared responsibility of
producers, packers, processors, distributors, retailers, food service operators and consumers
(Sofos, 2008). This is important issue, because the increase in world population and
improvement of living standard increase the meat consumption and, especially in
developed countries, consumers prefer food with no additives or chemical residues; food
exposed to minimal processing; safe and economic food (Sofos, 2008; Nychas et al., 2008).
Logistics and Supply Chains in Agriculture and Food
The increasing interest in transparency of food supply chain leads food industries to
develop, implement and maintain traceability systems that improve food supply
management with positive implications for food safety and quality (Gebresenbet et al., 2011;
Smith et al., 2005). As animals stressing may damage meat quality, and lead to more
contamination with pathogens, humane treatment of animals is getting more attention
(Sofos, 2008). Tracking slaughter animals from birth to finished products and tracking food
shipments are becoming area of focus recently (Smith et al., 2005). This helps to control the
risk of animal disease, to reduce risk of tampering, to generate detail information on country
of origin and animal welfare in the global food supply systems (Smith et al., 2005).
Animal identification and traceability as well as meat processing and distribution are some
of the issues related to meat safety challenges (Sofos, 2008). In the process of establishment
of animal identification and tracking systems, countries should take the following into
consideration: Selection of appropriate technology and precision requirements, maintenance
of confidentiality, payment of costs, premises number and animal identification number,
livestock feed and meat safety (Sofos, 2008).
Underfeeding and stress of slaughter animals starts earlier than loading for transport to
abattoir and continues at different steps until the time of slaughtering. Especially, the way
non-ambulatory animals are managed at abattoirs has been reported as the ugliest aspects of
pre-slaughter handling. Gregory (2008) indicated that, in US, about 1.15% of cattle waiting
in pens at abattoirs in 1994 were downer animals and it was reduced to 0.8% in 1999. Recent
study in a developing country, Ghana, indicated that about 7% of cattle waiting at abattoirs
were downer animals (Frimpong et al., 2011).
For animal transport, besides the improvement of vehicles design and handling methods,
continuous and accurate measurement and report of stress inducing factors and stress
response parameters, and continuous observation of animals are necessary and essential to
improve animals’ welfare and the quality of meat, the final product. A complex
instrumentation system, described in Figure 3 was developed at the Engineering
department of Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (Gebresenbet and Eriksson,
1998) to carry out the measurements of the parameters mentioned earlier simultaneously
and continuously starting from the farms to the abattoir. The on-board instrumentation and
the satellite steered position of the vehicles were controlled from the cabin of the vehicle.
The instrumentation may be classified into four groups: Video cameras for monitoring
animal behaviour, Heart rate sensor, GPS for measuring transport route, geographical
location, vibration sensors, temperature and humidity sensors, emissions, and information
transmission from vehicle to stationary database.
Although long distance transport and poor handling are stressful and compromise animals’
welfare, there is tendency to reduce the number of abattoirs due to specialisation and
centralisation. Since such long distant transport has a negative impact on animal welfare,
meat quality and environment in the form of emissions emanating from vehicles, studies are
undergoing to identify means of reducing the transport distance , transport time and animal
stress in animal supply chain and meat distribution (Bulitta et al., 2011). Especially loading
and unloading during transport for slaughter are identified as very stressful activities for
Pathways to Supply Chain Excellence
Fig. 3. (a) Sketch of instrumented vehicle showing the positions of sensors , video camera
and GPS; (b) vibration sensors mounted on animals
Gebresenbet and Ericsson (1998) made a continuous measurement of heart rate on cows
from resting conditions at farm throughout the trip to abattoirs up to the point of stunning.
The authors reported the performance of heart rate in relation to various activities from
farm to stunning point (see Figure 3). The typical output result is presented in Figure 4, and
as it can be observed the heart rate increased from about 45 bpm (beats per minute) to about
108 bpm during loading (separation of the animal from its group and forcing the animal
to clamp the ramp into the truck). After loading, the heart rate falls and stabilized as soon
as the animal was tied and maintained its position in the pen (Figure 4). The heart rate again
raised as the vehicle started its motion. Another high heart rate peak occurred (Figure 4)
when animals met unfamiliar animals from other farms, and the final rise in heart rate was
during unloading. It is important to note that the heart rate profile reported in Figure 4,
confirmed that loading and unloading activities are the most events that compromise the
welfare of animal during transport. Bulitta et al. (2011) modelled ( using exponential
function) and analysed how cattle heart rate responds to the stressful loading process and
indicated that heifers’ heart rate rose exponentially from its mean resting value (80+6
bpm) to a peak value (136+35 beat per minute) confirming that loading is very stressful
process for animals.
Two possible strategies for improving animal welfare during transport from farm to
abattoirs are:
i. Minimising stress-inducing factors through improving animal transport logistics and
handling methods. These include improving animal handling throughout the logistics
chain, improving the loading and unloading facilities, improving the driving
performance and slaughtering activities at abattoirs.
ii. Minimising or avoiding animal transport by promoting small-scale local abattoirs or
developing mobile or semi-mobile abattoirs.
In both alternatives effective logistics is an important aspect to logistics chain of farm-
abattoir system which encompasses all activities from loading animals, transport from farm
Logistics and Supply Chains in Agriculture and Food
to abattoir, unloading at the abattoir, operations in the slaughter chain from lairage box to
chill room for carcasses (see Figure 5). It is important to chill meat and meat products before
transportation. The primary chilling is the process of cooling meat carcasses after slaughter
from body to refrigeration temperatures. The European Union Legislation requires a
maximum final meat temperature of 7 oC before transport or cutting. After primary chilling,
any following handling such as cutting, mincing, etc., will increase the temperature of meat,
thus the secondary chilling is required to reduce temperature below 7 oC. Such a secondary
chilling is also of great importance in the case of pre-cooked meat products, because the
temperature of meat after the cooking process should be rapidly reduced from about 60 to 5
oC, to prevent or reduce growth of pathogens that have been survived the heat process or re-
contaminate the product (Nychas et al., 2008).
Fig. 4. Typical measured cow’s heart rate profile during handling and transport. The peaks
of the measured data indicate various events: loading of the animal on the truck; the
vehicle starts moving; mixing with un-familiar animals i.e., when loading other animals
from other farm; transport on the rough road; and un-loading at the abattoir
(Gebresenbet and Eriksson, 1998)
Meat spoilage may occur during processing, transportation and storage in market. An
important aspect of fresh meat distribution and consumption is effective monitoring of
time/temperature conditions that affect both safety and overall meat quality. Appropriate
packaging, transporting and storage of meat products are important, since meat products
spoil in a relatively short time. Scientific attention on meat spoilage increased when
shipment of large amounts of meat products started (Nychas et al., 2008). The EU
Heart rate, bpm
Time, minute
Trucks's initial
Meet un-familiar
Drive on rough
Pathways to Supply Chain Excellence
legislation requires a maximum final meat temperature of 7oC before transport and the
vehicle for meat transport must be provided with a good refrigerated system. The meat
transport from cold storage to retail outlet and then to the consumer refrigerator are
critical points for meat quality and safety (Nychas et al., 2008). Animal collection from
many farms and transporting to abattoirs requires a dynamic planning process taking into
consideration stress inducing factors such as road conditions, climate and traffic
conditions transport distance and time, queuing at the gate of abattoir for unloading
(Gebresenbet et al., 2011).
Fig. 5. Duration of activities in the cattle transport chain, from loading to slaughter;
observed mean values; for the activities following after suspension and bleeding, the values
were obtained from interviews; for loading and driving, average accumulated durations for
transport routes involving loading of cattle only (at on average 4 farms), are represented;
, full vehicle; , empty vehicle; , animal/carcass (Ljungberg et al., 2007)
A study conducted in Sweden (Gebresenbet et al., 2011a), comparing a small-scale local
abattoir (situated at the best location in the vicinity of targeted consumers outside big city)
to a large scale abattoir located in the centre of nearby big city indicated that establishment
of the small abattoir could play a significant role in increasing consumer confidence in local
meat products. In both cases (small scale abattoir and large scale abattoir) route analyses
were conducted to explore the potential savings in transport distance, time and emissions
related to animal collection from farm to abattoirs and meat distribution from abattoirs to
meat shops or consumers. Considering the animal collection from farms to small scale
abattoir, transport distance, time and emissions were reduced by 42% and 37% respectively
when compared to large scale abattoir (see Table 1). Similarly, considering meat distribution
from abattoir to consumers/retailers, the transport distance and time were reduced by 53%
and 46% respectively when small scale abattoir was used (Gebresenbet et al., 2011a). In
other case studies route optimisation experiments were conducted (i.e. measuring the real
world distribution route and re-planning the route by conducting route optimisation
experiments using RoutLogiX) on 34 routes of animal transport and 27 routes of meat
distribution and the potential improvements were obtained in terms of transport distance
and time (see Table 1).
Logistics and Supply Chains in Agriculture and Food
Case study No. of
Time before
Improvement due
to optimization %
Distance Time
Animal transport
I 19 163 2:47 3.6 4.1 Ljungberg et al., 2007
II 15 2750 46 18 22 Gebresenbet and
Ljungberg, 2001
IIIn 30 16500 126:21 42 37 Gebresenbet et al.,
Meat distribution
II 17 1638 62 17 21 Gebresenbet and
Ljungberg, 2001
IV 10 1597 - 4.7 2.7 Gebresenbet et al.,
2011b Gebresenbet et
al., 2011b
IVm 13 3054 62:45 37.7 32.4
IIIn 7 2256 27 53 46 Gebresenbet et al.,
n The case of comparison of small scale and large scale abattoir and improvement is when small scale is
compared to large scale abattoir
mThe case of coordination i.e. improvement is for route coordination (not necessarily for optimisation)
Table 1. Potential savings in distance and time by optimizing the routes of animal supply
and meat distribution
Coordination and optimisation in food distribution is a potential strategy to promote
economically effective and environmentally sustainable food distribution. A case study
conducted in Sweden pointed out that possible coordination of meat distribution in rural
area around a city could reduce transport distance and time up to 38% and 32% respectively
(see Table 1). The coordination could be formed between different companies distributing
different food items and companies distributing only meat; and between companies
distributing only meat. In a similar study, first coordinating and then optimising the food
deliveries in and around the city could reduce the number of routes by 58%, number of
vehicles by 42% and transport distance by 39% (Gebresenbet et al., 2011b). Such
coordination in food distribution system could also improve the vehicle load rate, motor
idling, emission from vehicles and congestion. Some of the major possibilities for improved
coordination and transport planning of agricultural goods transport are: possible
coordination of meat and dairy product distribution through combined loading; possible
coordination of fodder transport and grain transport through back-haulage; and partial or
total optimisation of vehicle fleet (Gebresenbet and Ljungberg, 2001).
Uncoordinated and non optimum food transport systems are not energy efficient in local
food systems, although there is considerable potential to increase the efficiency of energy
Pathways to Supply Chain Excellence
use by organizing the food delivery system in new ways (Beckeman and Skjöldebrand,
2007), using more energy efficient vehicles and/or introducing the production of biofuel in
the region (Wallgreen, 2006), increasing the utilization level of vehicles’ capacity (Ljungberg
and Gebresenbet, 2004) and planning optimum routes for food collection and distribution
systems (Gebresenbet and Ljungberg, 2001).
4. Logistics in milk supply and dairy product distribution
Milk is an important agricultural produce that livestock keepers use for both consumption
and market. The marketing of milk, surplus to family and farm needs, improves farm
income, creates employment in processing, marketing and distribution and contributes to
food security in rural and urban communities (Gebresenbet and Oodally, 2005).
In developing countries, demand for milk is expected to increase by 25% by 2025. In such
developing countries smallholders are the main producers of milk. Dairy imports to
developing countries have increased in value by 43% between 1998 and 2001, and over 80%
of milk consumed in developing countries, (200 billion litres annually), is handled by
informal market traders, with inadequate regulation (Gebresenbet and Oodally, 2005). From
transport services point of view, marketing of milk is difficult for producers who are living
in scattered and isolated areas. These farmers can only sell butter to the urban areas and the
remaining milk products are for home consumption. Delivery of fresh milk from long
distance to urban by small-scale farmers is difficult for two main reasons. Firstly, the daily
milk produce is relatively small to deliver to urban area and transporting perishable
commodity over long distance is difficult. Secondly, milk quality deteriorates as it is
transported over longer time without processing. The only available traditional processing
is fermentation. To promote marketing of milk for small-scale farmers, it is necessary to
develop strategies for on-farming chilling and collection of milk.
In developed nations, transport companies collect the milk from farms to collection points
and thereafter transport to dairy plants (Gebresenbet and Ljungberg, 1998). The dairy
industry provides a special milk container in which the farmers store the milk before the
transporters collect the milk. Usually tank Lorries and tank trailers are used for collecting
milk from farms and deliver to the nearest dairy. The milk supplied to dairy companies is
processed and distributed to consumers. The dairy products such as milk, powder, edible
fat and cheese are distributed by dairy product distributors. In such a process, the tank
Lorries collect milk upto their full capacity and pump to the tank trailer which is usually
placed in the best place as illustrated in Figure 6.
Optimizing the routes of milk collection enables to improve the transport distance and time.
Gebresenbet and Ljungberg (2001) measured 60 routes of milk collection which totalled to
be about 6357 km. By conducting optimization experiments on these routes, using LogiX
(DPS, 1996), the authors found that the distance could be reduced by 16%. Similar
optimization experiment on the routes of dairy product distribution reduced the distance by
22% and time by 24%.
In developed countries, it is noticed that due to structural changes in the milk production
system, the number of farms reduces while the level of production remains relatively
constant. This is shown by Figure 7 which illustrates the case of Sweden.
Logistics and Supply Chains in Agriculture and Food
Fig. 6. Schematic presentation of possible way of milk collection from farms and delivery to
the dairy industry (Gebresenbet and Ljungberg, 2001)
Fig. 7. Total milk production and number of milk producers in Sweden from 1960 to 1998;
, number of producers; , delivered milk (source: Gebresenbet and Ljungberg,
The European Union (EU) limits the maximum level of milk production of member
countries, for example in Sweden to 3.3 million tonnes per years (Gebresenbet and
Ljungberg, 2001; Bouamra-Mechemache et al., 2008). The domestic consumption of dairy
products in EU is as high as 90% of its milk production. And still, EU is a major player on
the world dairy market and the EU dairy sector is expected to be market oriented in the
future (Bouamra-Mechemache et al., 2008). The milk quotas enabled the EU market gain
stability for the last 25 years and the international market have also benefited due to
strategic product management on the world market. The expected challenge to future dairy
industry is world dairy market fluctuations and price volatility due to the increase in EU
milk quota by 1% annually until 2015, the year when the quota will be removed ultimately
(Geary et al., 2010). This in turn will have impact on logistics of milk and dairy products in
the future.
Pathways to Supply Chain Excellence
In developing countries individual traders or small scale agencies collect milk from
producers and supply to collection centres. Milk may be carried to the collection points as
head loads, shoulder slings, on bicycles, on pack animals, animal carts or small boats
(Gebresenbet and Oodally, 2005). Advanced milk collection process found in developing
countries begins with the producer delivering milk to a collection point where the volume
is measured, or the milk weighed, recorded, and sometimes it is sampled and checked for
quality. The milk is later transported, to a larger collection centre where, if possible, it is
chilled. The collected milk is subsequently sent in bulk to a processing plant by truck. The
time-delay from milking to delivery at the processing plant often exceeds five hours and
is negatively affecting the quality of non-refrigerated milk, which is often rejected by
dairy processing plants and is also not acceptable by consumers (Gebresenbet and
Oodally, 2005).
In countries like Mauritius, the marketing of the milk is traditionally undertaken by milk
retailers who visit several cow keepers, holding special containers with capacity of 300 litres
for transporting fresh milk. The retailer fills the container after visiting 10 to 15 producers
and then proceeds to the urban areas to deliver to the consumers. The link between the
retailer and the cow keepers is very important as it enables the producers to concentrate on
production while the retailer provides a reliable market for the produce. A milk collection
system that under-estimated the role of retailers was initiated in Mauritius but failed,
because instead of developing policies and effective credit system for the producers and
converting retailers into private contractors to supply the factory with milk, the system
tried to by-pass them creating a system which was not sustainable (Gebresenbet and
Oodally, 2005).
A milk collection initiative in Brazil where a milk collection programme was developed
for farmers, most of whom were producing 100 litres per day per farm on average, was
found to be successful (Urraburu, 2001). The important element in the programme was the
common cooling tank. Within a year, bulk milk collection production grew from 28% to
70% and included 55 private cooling tanks representing some 55,000 litres per day. The
impacts of the programme on dairy farmers was the dramatic reduction of transport costs,
which in some regions fell by 80%, improvement of product quality as the time between
milking and conveying milk to the dairy was significantly reduced (Gebresenbet and
Oodally, 2005)
5. Logistics in grain supply chain
During the recent 20 years, goods flow has been tremendously increased, mainly not due
to the increase in the amount of goods, but due to other factors such as specialization and
centralization of production systems and globalization of marketing (Gebresenbet and
Ljungberg, 2001). Agricultural goods transport is a significant component within such
increasing goods transport. For example about 13% of the international sea-borne trade is
grain transport (Gebresenbet and Ljungberg, 2001). Grain transport is the main
component in agricultural transport in general and it includes grain transports from farm
to depot/terminals, between farms, between terminals, from farms and terminals to
fodder industries and mills and from terminals to ports for export. Figure 8 illustrates the
Logistics and Supply Chains in Agriculture and Food
material flows to, within and from agriculture and food sector (Gebresenbet and
Ljungberg, 2001).
Due to the legal limit of total weight of a lorry, the drivers have to estimate the load weight
and it is not unusual that the actual loads exceed the legal maximum loads due to
overloading (see Figure 9). The case study in Sweden (Gebresenbet and Ljungberg, 2001)
indicated that the load rate for grain transport routes is as high as 95% at the delivery point
during the harvesting season.
Fig. 8. Material flows from and to farms and other sectors in Uppsala region; *intervention is
export subsidized by the European Union (EU); the national department of agriculture
buys grain and stores it from season to season before it is exported, to reduce price
fluctuations and support the lowest price level:
Means of production~seed, fertilizer ize (commercial), plant protection, supplies
to fodder factory, etc.; Agricultural produce~grain, milk, live and slaughtered animals;
, Processed products~flour, malt, fodder, dairy products, meat;
By-products~bran, whey, natural fertilizer, by-products from malt production
(Gebresenbet and Ljungberg, 2001).
Pathways to Supply Chain Excellence
These authors also mentioned that during grain-related transport routes,
unnecessary/unjustified motor idling was found to be more than 30% of stoppage time.
They also estimated the emission from vehicles during grain transport before and after
optimisation of grain transport routes. Table 2 presents the motor idling and emission
reduction by optimising the transport routes of grain in relation to other agricultural
products such as milk and meat. Air emissions were calculated using the simulation model
developed earlier by Gebresenbet and Oostra (1997), where the following parameters were
considered: vehicle type, time (loading; unloading and idling); goods type; load capacity
utilization level; transport distance; vehicle speed; geographical position of depot and
delivery points; routes air emissions from vehicles.
Fig. 9. Load rate distribution at unloading point of grain: The figure illustrates that load
rates exceed 100% in many cases (source: Gebresenbet and Ljungberg, 2001).
Description No. of
Time before
[ %]
of CO2
Grain transport 45 4995 97 36 6.3
Milk transport 60 6357 185 65 6
Dairy transport 28 2234 92 3.5 22
Animal transport 15 2750 46 1.6 18
Meat transport 17 1638 62 4.6 17
*-source: Gebresenbet and Ljungberg, 2001 with some modification.
**Motor idling time in relation to total time.
Table 2. Motor idling and possible reduction of emission during transport of grain and other
agricultural products*
In grain transport systems, back-hauling can be used for the delivery of fodder to farms
(Gebresenbet and Ljungberg, 2001). Although the grain transport from farms is concentrated
during the harvesting season, there is a possibility to coordinate the delivery of fertilizers
Logistics and Supply Chains in Agriculture and Food
and other means of production with grain transport i.e. the farmers can dry their grain and
keep it at the farm till the time of delivery of means of production. The intensity of grain
delivery at the harvest season causes capacity problems for vehicle resources and transport
planning. Planning of production and orders at farm level, to minimize the seasonal effects,
would improve the conditions for transport planning and coordination (Gebresenbet and
Ljungberg, 2001). In developing countries, grain collectors are responsible for
commercialising the grain within the country and exporting surplus. Even though, these
grain collectors are considered as informal by the government body in some countries, they
served an important role in the grain supply chain. For commercialising grain, it can be
collected from individual farmers to a critical size that can be transported cheaply for retail
locally, and the surpluses can be exported at premium prices elsewhere (Gebresenbet and
Oodally, 2005).
6. Logistics in local food supply chain
In the agriculture sector, globalization of food production has considerably influenced the
food supply system by increasing distance the food has to be transported to reach
consumers. This situation not only has increased emissions of greenhouse gases but also has
reduced the relationship between local food producers and consumers, affecting local food
producers, their environment and culture. In terms of distance, locally produced food can be
characterized by the proximity of production place to the consumers and usually there is a
limit, e.g. 160 km in UK, and 250 km in Sweden. In addition to geographical distance, locally
produced food is also considered as food which meets a number of criteria such as animal
welfare, employment, fair trading relations, producer profitability, health, cultural and
environmental issues (Bosona et al., 2011). Currently it is observed that customers have been
motivated (to purchase the local food) by contributing positively to the ecosystem (a more
altruistic reason) and by food quality and pleasure (a more hedonistic reason) (Brown et al.
2009; Bosona and Gebresenbet, 2011).
In this section we presents the main results of two case studies in Sweden, concerning the
investigation of local food supply chain characteristics and developing a coordinated
distribution system to improve logistics efficiency, reduce environmental impact, increase
potential market for local food producers and improve traceability of food origin for
consumers. In these studies, integrated logistics networks were developed by forming
clusters of producers and determining the optimum collection centers (CC) linking food
producers, food distributors and consumers/retailers enabling coordinated distribution of
local food produces and facilitating the integration of food distribution in the local food
supply systems into large scale food distribution channels (see Figures 10 and 11). In these
case studies, after mapping the location of producers and delivery points as well as potential
collection and distribution centers using geographic information system (GIS), the best
collection points were determined using center-of-gravity and load-distance techniques
(Russell and Taylor, 2009). Then detailed collection and distribution routes were analysed
using RoutelogiX software (DPS, 2004). As summarized in Table 3, the result of the analysis
indicated that coordinating and integrating the logistics activities of local food delivery
system reduced the number of routes, the transport distance and transport time for the
delivery system of local food. Such logistics network integration could have positive
Pathways to Supply Chain Excellence
improvements towards potential market, logistics efficiency, environmental issue and
traceability of food quality and food origin.
Cluster boundary
Production center
Distribution from
Link between
and producers
existing distribution system
new supply network with CC
Distribution by Producers
Fig. 10. Fragmented distribution system (existing) and newly proposed coordinated
distribution system via CC (collection center) to different customers (Source: Bosona and
Gebresenbet, 2011)
Fig. 11. Network of product delivery system with coordinated collection. DC1, DC2, DC3
represent three of large scale food distribution channels. The dashed line indicates the case
of direct delivery from CC to retailers or customers.
Logistics and Supply Chains in Agriculture and Food
Case study No. of
Time before
Improvement due to
optimization %
Routes Distance Time
I 81 8935 226 68 50 48 Bosona and
II* 23 6159 69 87 93 91 Bosona et al.,
*- Although there were more scenarios, the scenario with best improvement was chosen.
Table 3. Potential savings obtained by co-ordination and integration of routes for delivering
locally produced food
Coordination and network integration in local food supply chain increases logistics efficiency,
potential market, access to information and reduces environmental impact (Bosona and
Gebresenbet, 2011; Gebresenbet and Ljungberg 2001, Ljungberg, 2006; Ljungberg et al, 2007).
In the food distribution system of local food producers, logistics is fragmented and inefficient
compromising the sustainability of localized systems and this requires improvement (see
Figure 11 and Table 3). Therefore forming the best collection and distribution centres for
locally produced food is very important. Such location decisions should be supported
technically since the location decisions have the dynamic implication over time (Sabah and
Thomas, 1995). Therefore, in the process of developing improved logistics systems in the
local food supply chain, detailed location analysis (mapping and clustering producers and
determining optimum location of collection and/or distribution centres) and route analysis
(creating optimised routes for product collection and distribution, simulating route distance
and delivery time) are very essential (Bosona and Gebresenbet, 2011) .
Potential producers of local food want to expand their sales area. However, increasing sales
of locally produced food, on small scale bases, needs to overcome the main problems such
as low size of production and more volatility of market price and high seasonality of food
products on market, inadequate packing and storage facilities, limited or no means of
transport and limited knowledge of potential market (Bosona et al., 2011). These problems
can be overcome mainly if the local food systems can be embraced by dominant food
supermarket and superstore chains and this can be facilitated by integrating the local food
system into large scale food distribution channels.
Such integration in local food systems plays a key role in sharing information and
scarce/expensive resources as it enables the stake holders get access to the right information
at the right time. Well organized information concerning local food is important to satisfy
the increasing demand of consumers to have good knowledge and information of the food
origin and how it is handled and transported. The logistics network integration is also
helpful in creating favourable situation for interested researchers. For example, well
established data management might come into existence which in turn helps to conduct
Pathways to Supply Chain Excellence
more detail studies on the logistics activities enabling further improvements that increase
the sustainability of local food systems (Bosona and Gebresenbet, 2011, Bosona et al., 2011).
The integration also facilitates improved traceability system which depends on information
connectivity and provides an added layer of food security which might be established more
easily within integrated systems (Bantham and Oldham, 2003; Engelseth, 2009). One
apparent advantage of such a co-ordination and logistics network integration is that each
stakeholder in the network concentrates on its specialty and improves its productivity in
both quality and quantity (Beckeman and Skjöldebrand, 2007).
Studies (Bosona et al, 2011; Bosona and Gebresenbet, 2011) indicate that in local food
systems, producers of local food run mostly their own vehicles and about half of the vehicle
capacity is unutilized. Therefore, the coordination and logistics network integration in local
food system leads towards positive environmental impact by: (i) Reducing number of
vehicles to be deployed for produce collection and distribution of local food products; (ii)
Increasing the utilization level of vehicle loading capacity; (iii) Reducing travel distance,
time and fuel by following optimized routes where possible; (iV) Reducing green house gas
emissions (as the consequence of the facts mentioned above).
7. Conclusion
From effective logistics management point of view, an integrated approach from farm-to-
table is required for effective control of food hazards which is a shared responsibility of
producers, packers, processors, distributors, retailers, food service operators and consumers.
Therefore, tracking slaughter animals from birth to finished products and tracking food
shipments are becoming area of focus recently. Studies indicated that, in the food and
agriculture supply chains, there are potential area of logistics related improvements in terms
of reducing transport routes, distance and time; reducing emission from vehicles; improving
the packaging of food products and improving transport services. This can be implemented
in collecting, storing and transporting slaughter animals, meat products, milk and dairy
products, grain and related products.
These logistics related improvements are possible in developed and developing countries. In
case of local food systems, an iintegrated logistics network that embraced producers,
customers (delivery points), collection centers and distribution centers in the local food
supply chain is very important, because the logistics services in such local systems are
fragmented and inefficient, compromising competence of local food producers. Introducing
and implementing logistics related coordination and integration in the local food systems
greatly improve the sustainability of local food systems. In general, studying and
identifying the constraints and developing and implementing more effective and efficient
concepts of logistics services in the agriculture and food supply chains is very essential for
overall economic growth of a country and for environmental benefits.
General observations for practitioners
Agriculture and food supply chain is specific and complex area with important
responsibilities. There are two main demands:
a. Maintaining food quality and safety including animal welfare along the supply chain,
Logistics and Supply Chains in Agriculture and Food
b. Reducing logistics cost.
The concept of Agricultural and Food Logistics is slowly emerging as one of the important
types of logistics to reach the requirements for maintaining quality of raw materials for food
and food products or even to perform value adding activities in the food supply chain. The
questions related to post harvest loss, which ranges up to 70% in developing countries,
animal welfare during transport, and the concern of origin of food staffs and how they are
produced and processed are societal questions.
In relation to globalization of marketing system, it is a vital for all stakeholders to reduce
logistics cost in order to increase their economic competitiveness. Therefore, development of
effective and efficient Agricultural and Food Logistics is necessary and essential.
8. References
Bantham A. and Oldham C. (2003). Creating value through traceability Solutions.
FoodOrigins, Illinois, USA.
Beckeman M. and Skjöldebrand C. (2007). Clusters/networks promote food
innovationsJournal of Food Engineering 79,1418-1425.
Bosona T, Gebresenbet G., Nordmark I., Ljungberg D. (2011). Integrated logistics network
for supply chain of locally produced food, part I: Location and route optimization
analysis. Journal of service science and management 4, 174-183.
Bosona T.G., Gebresenbet G. (2011). Cluster Building and logistics network integration of
local food supply chain. Biosystems engineering 108, 293-302.
Bouamra-Mechemache Z., Requillart V., Soregaroli C., Trevisiol A.(2008). Demand for dairy
products in the EU. Food policy, 33, 644-656.
Brewer A. M., Button k. J., Hensher D. A., (2001). Handbook of logistics and supply chain
management, first edition, The Netherlands.
Brown E., Dury S., Holdsworth M. (2009). Motivations of consumers that use local, organic
fruit and vegetable box schemes in central England and southern France. Appetite
Bulitta F.S., Bosona T., Gebresenbet G. (2011). Modelling the dynamic response of cattle
heart rate during loading for transport. Australian journal of agricultural sciences,
Cockram M.S.(2007). Criteria and potential reasons for maximum journey times for farm
animals destined for slaughter. Applied animal behavior science 106, 234-243.
DPS, 2004. Route LogiX Professional V5.0.4.39. Distribution Planning Software Ltd.,
Halesowen, UK.
Engelseth P., 2009. Food product traceability and supply network integration. Journal of
Business and industrial marketing, 24(5), 421-430.
Frimpong S., Gebresenbet G., Bobobe E., Aklaku E.D., Hamdu I., Bosona T. (2011). Animal
supply chain and logistics activities at Kumasi Abattoir, Ghana. MSc thesis.
Geary U., Lopez-Villalobos, N., Garrick D.J., Shalloo L. (2010). Development and application
of a processing model for the Irish dairy industry. Journal of dairy science, 93, 5091-
Gebresenbet G. and Oodally G. (2005). Review and analysis of rural agricultural transport
and logistics in developing countries: Technical Guidelines. Report, Swedish
University of Agricultural Sciences
Pathways to Supply Chain Excellence
Gebresenbet G., Bosona T.G., Ljungberg D., Aradom S.,(2011a). Optimisation analysis of
large and small-scale abattoirs in relation to animal transport and meat
distribution. Australian journal of agricultural engineering, 2(2), 31-39.
Gebresenbet G., Ljungberg D. (2001). Coordination and route optimization of agricultural
goods transport to attenuate environmental impact. Journal of agricultural
engineering research, doi:10.1006/jaer.2001.0746.
Gebresenbet G., Nordmark I., Bosona T., Ljungberg D. (2011b). Potential for optimised food
deliveries in and around Uppsala city, Sweden. Project report, Swedish University
of agricultural sciences, Uppsala.
Gebresenbet, G. 2001: Logistics and Rural Agriculture Systems. Workshop on Agricultural
Rural Transport, October 15 - 17, Nairobi
Gebresenbet, G., Eriksson, B. (1998). Effects of transport and handling on animal welfare,
meat quality and environment with special emphasis on tied cows. Report 233,
1998, Dept of Agric Engngn, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Report
233, 1998, Sweden
Gregory N. G. (2008). Animal welfare at markets and during transport and slaughter meat
science, 80, 2-11.
Ljungberg D., Gebresenbet G., and Aradom S. (2007). Logistics chain of animal transport
abattoir operations. Biosystems engineering, 96(2), 267-277.
Nychas G-J E., Skandamis P.N., Tassou C.C., Koutsoumanis K.P.(2008). Meat spoilage
during distribution, Meat Science 78, 77-89.
Russell R.S., Taylor B.W.( 2009). Operations Management along the Supply Chain, 6th
Edition, ISBN:978-0470-23379-5, John wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester.
Smith G.C., Tatum J.D., Belk K.E., Scanga J.A., Grandin T., Sofos J.N. (2005). Traceability
from a US perspective. Meat Science 71, 174-193
Sofos J. N., (2008). Challenges to meat safety in 21st century, Meat Science 78, 3-13.
Urraburu, J.P. (2000). Milk Collection, Preservation and Transport. Discussion paper 1.2. E-
mail conference on "Small Scale Milk Collection and Processing in Developing
Countries", 29 May - 28 July, 2000, FAO.
... There are restrictions related to the flow and storage of products and services in food and agribusiness in developed countries, such as a lack of sufficient storage facilities and knowledge of dealing, inadequate manufacturing, administration, and transportation services. The development of effective and efficient agricultural and food logistics is a critical component (Gebresenbet & Bosona, 2012). Therefore, the usual occurrence of one-way and empty haulage can be an onerous element in the agricultural sector as this lowers the maximization of the vehicles travelling from and to their destination (Wajszczuk, 2016). ...
... Transporting agricultural commodities is a substantial aspect in increasing the quantity produced in the production (Gebresenbet & Bosona, 2012). According to Carambas (2005), to maximize production supply, the use of marketing inputs can be rather used, and in turn, this would increase the prices faced by the consumers or the retail prices more than farmgate prices leading to higher marketing margins. ...
... The difficulty of balancing the supply and demand is usually in the production process due to the volatile influences of climate, immediacy, and perishability of the commodities (Yuzhou, 2020). Several farmers have a slight chance of alleviating their situation as the possible marketing activities are unable to fully perform their capacities due to incompetent transport conditions (Gebresenbet & Bosona, 2012). Binswanger and Singh (2017) stated that structural change triggers a reduction in the agricultural sector's share of production and labor, as well as a rise in the productivity gap, and until the economies develop, it can converge at low levels. ...
Full-text available
The logistics industry is a fundamental aspect of fulfilling the supply chain in agriculture. Agricultural farmers in the Philippines often use the services of middlemen to transact on their behalf since these intermediaries possess better information, and engaging in logistics affects the marketing margin in the process. Frequently, logistics costs cause marketing margin to increase, leading to high farm-retail prices of agricultural goods. This paper examines if the existence of middlemen improves farmers' wages even with the additional logistics costs incurred. The variables' secondary data were all gathered from the Philippine Statistics Authority, and its annual frequency spanned the period of 1995 to 2019. Using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression analysis procedure and diagnostic tests prove that logistics cost negatively affects marketing margin while farmers' wages have a positive relationship. The findings of this study address the presence of a longer supply chain, asymmetric information, technology, storage and facilities, and added logistics costs in agricultural transactions. Although middlemen have greater market power than the farmers, these mediators are still affected by the changes in the logistics costs since it is unavoidable for them to reduce the price due to the need to competitively sell the commodities.
... e evolution of e-commerce and m-commerce has impacted many sectors in developed and developing countries. Specifically, the agriculture supply chain (ASC) sector has evidenced many e-commerce and m-commerce platforms initiated to support selling and purchasing agricultural goods (agro-goods), also, in transport, loading, unloads, tracking, and tracing agro-goods [3]. Like many developing countries' economies, Tanzania largely depends on agriculture, accounting for 12% of GDP. e country's population is estimated at 61.7 million people, with 61% of the entire workforce employed in agriculture, 80% of which are smallholder farmers [1]. ...
... e approach lowers transportation costs incurred by smallholder farmers to meet Full-Truck-Load (FTL) requirements. e GPS coordinated maps, road network data, time, and network route optimization algorithm [3], such as Dijkstra's algorithm [23], to determine the shortest path from reported smallholder farmers to the nearest collecting vehicle located in an identified road-side virtual-collection point. e advancements in computing technology, such as High-Performance Computing (HPC), Internet of ings (IoT), cloud computing, artificial intelligence (AI), and big data generated from agro-goods e-commerce platforms make it possible to predict and optimize the demand and supply. ...
Full-text available
Despite massive mobile phones adoption globally, Agriculture Supply Chain (ASC) in Tanzania is challenged by the low adoption of m-commerce integrated to m-payment and m-transport services as key information enablers for efficiently linking farmers to buyers. With such an inefficient and ineffective information gap, middlemen have become information custodians by decreasing farmers’ bargaining power in the market. In addressing the challenge, this study uses stakeholders to validate core services needed and proposes service architecture for Agro-Goods Transport and Commerce (AgroTC) system using installable and build-in mobile phone applications (internet web, mobile apps, and USSD). The proposed method appreciates a user-centric approach for system development. A scenario of the potato supply chain in Tanzania was considered where 2309 respondents were interviewed from farmers, buyers, and transport service providers from a predetermined sample size (n = 384) having a 95% confidence level. Data were collected using mobile phones configured with Open Data Kit (ODK) technology and analyzed using the R Studio tool with Pandas libraries. The results indicated that buyers were not interested in disease and land management information. Collectively, farmers (74%) and buyers (60%) highly demand m-commerce services as a virtual platform for linking them. Only farmers showed concern about disease management information. Furthermore, 35% of the farmers and 57% of the buyers need m-transport, whereas 35% of the farmers and 69% of the buyers need m-payment service. It was revealed that the remaining percentages lack knowledge on mobile phone features to perform online businesses. All transport service providers pointed to the challenge of existing middlemen in reaching customers and required technological change in managing transport systems. The proposed mobile-based AgroTC architecture provides a foundation business approach in Tanzania and many developing countries. System developers and innovators can use the proposed architecture design to design prototypes using the preferred language to meet ASC stakeholders’ needs and expectations.
... Recently, most scholars focus on the distribution cost (e.g., Crowell [3], Holl and Mariotti [4], and Li [5]), influencing factors (e.g., Crowell [3], Ren et al. [6], Wang [7], and Hao [8]), concepts (e.g., Gebresenbet and Bosona [9] and Bernhardt et al. [10]), modes of rural logistics (e.g., Zhou and Yuan [11], Huang et al. [12], and Yang and Hu [13]), and lack of study on the demand forecast of rural logistics (e.g., Pan [14], Ding et al. [15], and Gong [16]). In order to fill the research gap, this study uses the gray forecasting model to predict the rural logistics demand in Guangdong Province. ...
Full-text available
With the advancement of Internet technology and the widespread use of mobile smartphones, urban e-commerce is becoming increasingly saturated. Rural e-commerce ushered in a new era of development. How to improve rural logistics carrying capacity to keep up with the development of rural e-commerce and better serve the development of rural e-commerce has become a hot topic. The purpose of this study is to predict logistics demand in the context of the development of rural e-commerce. We develop an indicator system for forecasting rural logistics demand in Guangdong Province. The GM (1,1) gray forecasting model with a weakening buffer operator was used to forecast rural logistics demand in Guangdong Province. According to the results, the prediction model has good matching and precision. It was also found that demand for rural logistics in Guangdong Province will generally rise in the short to medium term. Based on the findings of this study, the government should stimulate demand for rural consumer goods, encourage technological innovation, develop an Internet-rural logistics mode, and meet the supply requirements of rural logistics based on the situation of each region.
... Mistrust between the market participants can increase costs, losses and delays in any part(s) of the supply chain, causing waste of agricultural products and consequently reduced value delivered to final consumers. The mainstream industrial agriculture and food supply chains depend on large-scale production and processing, global and transregional logistics and distribution evolve increasingly vertically-integrated and consolidated to mitigate the problem of coordination, whereas market power is increasingly concentrated to a few large players [8,9]. This prevailing structure of agriculture supply chains has exposed inflexible supply disruptions and inertial to quickly respond to extensive and sudden changes of consumer demand after the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic [10]. ...
Conference Paper
The Covid-19 pandemic poses great challenges to the resilience of global agriculture in response to disasters or crises. The pandemic mitigation measures prevent the spread of coronavirus but bring disruptions to the agriculture sector. Smallholder farmers and small agricultural producer particularly showed their vulnerability to these disruptions amid the pandemic. Technology innovations can be adopted to develop resilient, flexible and inclusive agriculture. Blockchain enables autonomous and decentralized coordination of trust in a distributed network without any trusted third-party intermediaries that can vastly reduce the transaction costs of exchange and trade. This paper examines the viable applications of blockchain technology in enhancing the resilience of agriculture and the food supply chain, facilitating trades and financing, and driving value allocation from a perspective of institutional economics.
... Quality deteriorates rapidly after harvest (Yusianto et al. 2020). Post-harvest losses of up to 40% vary from 15 to 25% in agriculture and 10 to 15% in trade (Gebresenbet and Bosona 2012). Therefore, to reduce post-harvest losses, good cultivation management is needed. ...
Currently, more than 370 million tons of potatoes are produced worldwide, a significant increase from the previous year’s production volume of 333.6 million tons. However, the world’s population is also increasing rapidly, so that world food demand tends to increase faster than supply. Based on data, in 2030, the world’s global population is estimated to reach 8.5 billion, and food demand is expected to increase by 60%. Therefore, food security has become a global issue and the main topic of scientific discussion. Potatoes have been recommended as food horticulture that supports food security by the United Nations. However, potatoes have perishable characteristics that pose a risk of post-harvest loss of up to 40%. This study discussed good cultivation management, production capacity predictions, and real-time traceability methods to ensure food security and meet global food needs. The results showed that cropland suitability for potato cultivation was strongly influenced by various factors such as altitude, soil texture, slope percentage, rainfall, and temperature. Based on the spatial analysis of physical and climatic factors, namely at an altitude above 1,300 m asl, the temperature is between 17-200C with the andosol soil texture, sloping land slope. Rainfall above 300 mm/month obtained an average value of good land conditions with few inhibiting factors. Meanwhile, the production capacity prediction using IoT shows that the IoT with the SHT15 sensor and rain gauge with remote sensing has an accuracy rate of 97.93%. It means that predictions of world potato production in the next few years can be more accurate. The results of the traceability system mechanism and IoT integration can solve the problem of world food security. Tracking and tracing using smart logistics can help decision-making solve food security problems.
... The pure cost of biomass production suffers from a cost disadvantage compared to fossil feedstocks [11][12][13][14]. Unlike fossil feedstocks, which are highly concentrated at regionally limited deposit sites mainly in Russia, the Middle East, West Africa, North and South America, and Australia biomass is cultivated in a land-intensive manner and with correspondingly complex logistics [15][16][17][18]. With the involvement of numerous suppliers such as the seed industry and chemicals (pesticides, fertilizers), the value chain to biomass is complex [19]. ...
The economic concept of the circular bioeconomy addresses not only the sectors of the traditional bioeconomy but also, in particular, the sectors of bio-based chemicals and energies as well as waste management. This concept is basically based on closing material cycles, in particular, but not only, that of carbon. Managing these material cycles is costly, which is why economic sustainability and, in the current transition phase, competitiveness with fossil-based value chains remain a constant challenge. Because of the large material turnover of the mentioned industries, in the interest of environmental sustainability the circular bioeconomy has to respect the limits of natural resources. With the raw material shift from fossil to renewable resources, regional economic structures and jobs will change and, in addition, circularity requires a change in consumption behavior. Both are challenges that need to be addressed in the interest of social acceptance and sustainability. The article focuses on the economic, but addresses also the ecological and social aspects, discusses options for achieving a comprehensively sustainable circular bioeconomy, and identifies research needs necessary for the further development of the bioeconomy.
... The developments and impacts of ITS have been realized high in developed countries [6], especially in transportation services, such as autonomous vehicles and applications to smart cities. There is little focus on Freight Intelligent Transport Systems (FITS) when viewing local contexts in developing countries. ...
Full-text available
The technological advancement in Intelligent Transport Systems and mobile phones enable massive collaborating devices to collect, process, and share information to support the sales and transportation of agricultural goods (agro-goods) from farmer to market within the Agriculture Supply Chain. Mobile devices, especially smartphones and intelligent Point of Sale (PoS), provide multiple features such as Global Positioning System (GPS) and accelerometer to complement infrastructure requirements. Despite the opportunity, the development and deployment of the innovative platforms integrating Agro-goods transport services with e-commerce and e-payment systems are still challenging in developing countries. Some noted challenges include the high cost of infrastructure, implementation complexities, technology, and policy issues. Therefore, this paper proposes a framework for integrating ITS services in agro-goods e-commerce, taking advantage of mobile device functionalities and their massive usage in developing countries. The framework components identified and discussed are Stakeholders and roles, User Services, Mobile Operations, Computing environment with Machine Learning support, Service goals and Information view, and Enabling Factors. A Design Science Research (DSR) method is applied to produce a framework as an artifact using a six-step model. Also, a case study of potato sales and transportation from the Njombe region to Dar es Salaam city in Tanzania is presented. The framework constructs the ability to improve information quality shared among stakeholders; provide a cost-effective and efficient approach for buying, selling, payment, and transportation of Agriculture goods.
Full-text available
Sustainable Development. Momentum for change led to the first ever United Nations Food Systems Summit in September 2021, which agreed on innovative solutions and strategies to transform agrifood systems and leverage those changes to deliver progress across all the SDGs. The Summit ’s call to action focused on five objectives, one of which is building resilience to vulnerabilities, shocks and stresses to ensure the continued functioning of healthy, sustainable agrifood systems. The theme of this year’s report responds to the United Nations Food Systems Summit ’s call to bring forward a series of concrete actions that people from all over the world can take to support transformation of the world’s agrifood systems. More specifically, the report provides evidence and guidance on actions that can help actors in agrifood systems manage their vulnerability to shocks and stresses, and strengthen the capacity of these systems to support livelihoods and sustainably provide continuous access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to all in the face of disruptions. To this end, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has developed a suite of resilience indicators designed to measure the robustness of primary production, the extent of food availability, and the degree of people’s physical and economic access to adequate food in countries worldwide. These indicators can help assess the capacity of national agrifood systems to absorb the impact of any shock, which is a key aspect of resilience. Analysis shows that a country’s primary production sector is more resilient when it produces a diverse mix of food and non-food products and sells them to a wide range of markets, both domestic and international, a configuration mainly seen in higher-income countries or those with a large agrifood base. In terms of food availability, however, analysis of multiple sourcing pathways for crop, fish and livestock commodities shows that lower-income countries have a diversit y that is comparable to that of larger, higher-income countries. Another important aspect underscored by this report is that low-income countries face much bigger challenges in ensuring physical access to food through transport networks, key to keeping agrifood supply chains active. Analysis of data from 90 countries shows that if main transport routes were disrupted, many low-income countries in particular would have limited capacit y to decentralize food distribution or use alternative deliver y routes. For nearly half the countries analysed, the closure of critical network links would increase local transport time by 20 percent or more, thereby increasing costs and food prices for consumers. Taking an agrifood systems approach, the report also notes that risks associated with economic access to food are even more worrisome. Globally, we already know that around 3 billion people cannot afford a healthy diet to protect against malnutrition. Since low-income households spend most of their income on food, any significant loss of purchasing power – from food price hikes, crop failures or loss of income – poses a threat to their food security and nutrition. In fact, this report finds that an additional 1 billion people are at risk as they would not be able to afford a healthy diet if a shock were to reduce their incomes by one-third. The burden of this shock would fall mostly on middle-income countries, but the report also notes that, in the event of such an income shock, proportionately many more people in low-income countries would be unable to afford even an energy-sufficient diet. These risks are unacceptable in a world that produces enough food to feed its entire population. The report finds that diverse, redundant and well-connected agrifood supply chains are needed to increase resilience, as they provide multiple pathways for producing, sourcing and distributing food. However, some actors in these agrifood supply chains are more vulnerable than others. The vulnerability of small and medium agrifood enterprises (SMAEs) is critical, as well as the fact that the resilience capacity of rural households – especially those involved in small-scale agricultural production – is increasingly put to the test in the face of adverse climatic events and depletion of natural resources. Based on the evidence of this report, FAO is in a strong position to recommend that governments make resilience in agrifood systems a strategic part of national and global responses to ongoing and future challenges. A guiding principle is diversity – input sources, production mixes, output markets and supply chains – because diversity creates multiple pathways for absorbing shocks. Connectivity multiplies benefits: well-connected agrifood networks overcome disruptions faster by shifting sources of supply and channels for transport, marketing, inputs and labour. Governments should encourage better coordination and organization of SMAEs within agrifood supply chains through, for example, forming consortia, which increase their scale, visibility and inf luence. Similarly, small-scale food producers can stay competitive and resilient by integrating into supply chains through producer associations and cooperatives, and by adopting resource-conserving practices. Social protection programmes may be needed to improve rural households’ resilience in the event of shocks. Policies should also address issues beyond agrifood systems, including the need for better health and education services, gender equality and women’s participation, and must recognize agrifood’s role as a steward of the natural environment. FAO stands firmly committed to taking advantage of the opportunity offered by events such as the United Nations Food Systems Summit and others to move from commitments to action in order to transform agrifood systems to make them more efficient, more inclusive, more resilient and more sustainable for better production, better nutrition, a better environment and a better life for all, leaving no one behind. This report offers evidence and guidance to take concrete steps in this important direction.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Wine tourism is one of the relatively young tourist activities in the Czech Republic, wine as a tourist product has only recently begun to be promoted to a greater extent. The beginnings of wine tourism can be traced mainly to southern Moravia, where wine growing is traditionally associated with a specific rural culture and folk architecture. On the example of a particular wine region, this paper captures natural as well as cultural and material-technical prerequisites for tourism development and introduces it to potential tourists. The aim is to apply localization and implementation factors within a wine tourism field on a territory of Moravia in the Czech Republic. The Moravia wine region has a high potential for wine tourism and further development by natural as well as cultural and historical predisposition, followed by well-spread cycling routes, number of touristic attractions and services facilities together with quality wine production.
Full-text available
Globally rural households with less landholding, especially from developing countries, are more food insecure due to a lack of resources accessibility and fewer marketplaces. This study was planned to inspect the relationship between household food security and market approachability concerning Household Food Insecurity Access Index (HFIAS). For data collection, 200 farming households from five districts (Faisalabad, Sheikhupura, Rawalpindi, Rahim Yar Khan and Mianwali) from five agro-ecological zones of Punjab were selected as respondents. So, the results can be comprehensive and widespread at the provincial level. Interviews with household heads were conducted with the help of a well-structured and pre-tested interview questionnaire. Food security was calculated with the help of the household food insecurity access score, which calculates food intake for one month and indicates the level of food security based on food consumption during the last thirty days. According to research findings of 46 percent are severely food insecure, and the main reason behind so much food insecurity is rising food prices, increasing fuel prices, transportation costs, lack of agricultural input, and very few marketplaces. Binary logistic regression shows that landholding, earning hands in family, and the distance of farm from the market have a significant effect on the food security status of the family. As the distance of farm from market place increases labour costs, transportation costs, and fuel charges that affect household livelihood inversely. The results suggest that local food security can be enhanced by creating off-farm employment opportunities, improved transportation facilities, and road infrastructure.
Full-text available
Researchers in animal welfare and transport use heart rate (HR) as an important parameter to describe animal response to emotional and physical stresses. This study examined the dynamic HR response in cows to stress-inducing factors during loading for transport. The simulation model was developed using Powersim software via application of exponential function to describe the pattern of HR signals during loading. The model was tested on HR data of 18 cattle (11 heifers aged 14-16 months and 7 cows aged 2-3 years) and it described the HR profile well. The mean coefficient of determination, R 2 , was found to be 0.89 + 0.06. The HR rose exponentially from its mean resting value to a peak value (about 1.9 times the value at resting level) and then declined during a recovery period (about 1.15 times the value at resting level). The mean HR at resting condition, peak, and after recovery was 80+6 bpm, 136+35 bpm and 91+19 bpm for heifers and 47+4 bpm, 102+27 bpm, and 55+12 bpm for cows, respectively. The rate of increase in HR (during rising period) was greater than the rate of decrease during the recovery period. In all HR data sets, it was noticed that HR reduced immediately after it attained the peak value. Abbreviations: t_time in s; HR_ heart rate in bpm (beat per minute); HR rest _heart rate at resting condition; HR max _peak heart rate value; HR rec _recovered heart rate; A 1 _amplitude of the rising heart rate in bpm; A 2 _amplitude of the decreasing heart rate in bpm; T 1 _time of rising period in s; T 2 _time of recovery period in s; r 1 _parameter describing growth rate of heart rate in s -1 ; r 2 _parameter describing the recovery rate of heart rate in s -1 ; R 2 _coeficient of determination; DDE_dynamic data exchange.
Full-text available
Due to a growing interest in locally produced food (LPF), there is a tendency of promoting local food systems. The ob-jective of this study was to investigate the existing flow of LPF from producers to consumers and develop a coordinated and efficient distribution system for producers in Halland region, Sweden. An integrated logistics network (ILN) em-bracing producers, retailers, a collection centre (CC) and a distribution centre (DC) was proposed. Data collection, location analysis and route optimisation analysis were conducted. Geographic information system (GIS) and Route LogiX software were utilised for the analyses. Four scenarios of food distribution were identified and analyzed. When compared to the existing system, the best scenario improved transport distance, time and number of routes up to 93%, 92% and 87% respectively. The distribution of LPF was integrated into large scale food distribution channel (LSFDC) and this could increase the sustainability of local food system.
It is the view of many organisations that, whenever possible, it is more appropriate to slaughter animals close to their source of production and transport the carcase rather than transport sentient live animals for slaughter, when long journeys may put their welfare at risk. However, more evidence is required on the effects on the welfare of farmed animals of long distance transport in order to provide a basis for specifying maximum journey times. A rationale for restricting journey time could be made on the basis that: aspects of welfare are adversely affected after a specific journey duration and, thus, stopping a journey before this occurs would help to minimise any adverse effects; transportation is a continuous, aversive experience for animals and restricting journey time would minimise the duration of this experience; there are many risk factors associated with transportation that have the potential to adversely affect aspects of welfare and the longer the journey, the greater the risk; and if animals were sub-clinically infected, limiting journeys would slow down the distribution of the infectious disease. There is an alternative argument that too much emphasis has been placed on journey times and that greater focus should be placed on the quality of the journey. If care is taken only to select animals fit for transport, the environmental conditions (including driving style, road conditions, vehicle design and operation, space allowance, thermal conditions and ventilation), and the pre- and post-transport handling of the animals are optimal, it may be possible to transport certain types of animals over long distances without major welfare problems. However, if there is widespread non-compliance with regulations or industry standards and inadequate enforcement or supervision to provide optimal conditions, the argument for limiting journey times is strengthened. The evidence to support these approaches is discussed by considering the factors affecting the welfare of farmed animals during road transport, and by using examples of the behavioural and physiological responses of sheep to journey length and duration of feed and water restriction.
The food supply chain is a current focus for considerations of food safety and environmental impacts. The objective of this study was to investigate local food supply chain characteristics and develop a coordinated distribution system to improve logistics efficiency, reduce environmental impact, increase potential market for local food producers and improve traceability of food origin for consumers. The study was based on data from 90 local food producers and 19 existing large scale food distribution centres (LSFDC) from all over Sweden. Location analysis was done using Geographic Information System (GIS) to map locations of producers and LSFDCs; to build cluster of producers; and to determine optimal product collection centres (CC). The route analysis was carried out using Route LogiX software, firstly for collection of food products from farms to CCs based on two scenarios, either producers transporting their products (no coordination) or CCs managing coordinated collection of products, and secondly for product distribution from CCs to potential markets. When compared to the first scenario, the second had improved the number of routes, driving distance and product delivery time by 68%, 50% and 47% respectively. In total, 14 clusters of producers were formed and 86% of these clusters could be integrated into the LSFDCs. This network integration could make positive improvements towards potential markets, logistics efficiency, environmental issues and traceability of food quality.
Food products are among the most frequently delivered items to retail shops in city centres and also need special attention owing to their perishable nature and quality requirements. The main objective of this study was to map out the segments of food distribution systems and determine the constraints and possibilities in developing a co-ordinated and optimised food distribution system in and around Uppsala city, to promote efficiency and environmental sustainability. The study was conducted by arranging a series of seminars, carrying out field measurements, optimisation analysis and emission estimation. Data on eight companies that distribute food in and around Uppsala city, distribute were gathered and analysed. Different tools were used successfully i.e. Global Positioning System (GPS) for field measurement, RouteLogiX for route optimisation analysis and MODTRANS (a Matlab based package) for emission estimation. Optimising the individual routes reduced travel distance by 39% and time by 40% while total optimisation reduced the number of routes by 58%, the number of vehicles by 42%, and the total distance by 39%. Consequently, optimisation could reduce emissions generated by vehicles by 48%.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop a more precise conceptual understanding of the interplay between food product traceability and supply network integration. Design/methodology/approach A resource‐based network approach was used to create a framework with empirical evidence from a fresh strawberry product case. Findings A conceptual model describes product traceability as interacting with different organizational and informational resources. Research limitations/implications This is a preliminary model that substantiates a cross‐functional approach teamwork‐based to developing product traceability. Originality/value The study shows developing food product traceability as a complex undertaking dependent on information connectivity including a technical aspect of supply chain integration, and different forms of knowledge, an organizational aspect of supply chain integration.
This paper reports the study made on goods flow to, from, and within the agricultural sector in Uppsala region in Sweden in 1999. Agricultural and related goods transport has increased steadily in the recent decades, and empty haulage is common (up to about 45%) in the sector. The resulting transport intensification leads to environmental degradation by contributing to air pollution, global warming, ozone depletion, resource depletion, congestion and traffic accidents.The main objective of the current work is to map out the material flow and to investigate the possibilities of coordinated transport of agricultural produce and agricultural means of production, supported by information technology. It is assumed that the information achieved through this investigation will assist to develop an effective transport-logistics system, which may enable an efficient utilization of vehicles to meet the current demand for attenuating environmental impacts.Data collection on daily goods distribution and collection including geographical location of collections/distribution points and routes was done using the global positioning system, GPS. A total of 196 routes were measured and optimization of goods distribution/collection and route was done made using the gathered data to estimate the environmental benefit.Possibilities and constraints of coordinated goods distribution and collection were analysed. Optimization of routes and distribution/collection and the computed emissions from the vehicles as a result of optimization are presented.
Transport and handling of slaughter animals are associated with a series of stressful events for animals, compromising welfare and meat quality. This necessitates the development of effective logistics systems, taking into consideration, road and traffic conditions, climate, transport time and distance, and queuing at delivery. The objective of the current work was to describe the logistics chain of animal transport and abattoir operations in order to demonstrate potential effects of operations planning and route optimisation on animal welfare, meat quality and the environment. The operation considered involves loading, transporting and unloading animals and the slaughter chain from lairage box to cooling room for cattle carcasses. Data collection was carried out through truck-driver interviews; activity registration on routes and at delivery, and slaughter chain activity registration. Uneven distribution of delivery arrivals affected handling at the delivery gate. Queues before delivery and vehicle washing created problems, as reported by the drivers. Time and distance of transport could be reduced through route optimisation. The analysis of collection routes indicated potential for savings of more than 20% in time, for individual routes.