ArticlePDF Available

Suicide Risk Assessment in Clinical Practice: Pragmatic Guidelines for Imperfect Assessments

Abstract and Figures

This practice review focuses on the challenges of conducting sensitive and accurate assessments of the relative risk for suicide attempts and completed suicides. Suicide and suicide attempts are a frequently encountered clinical crisis, and the assessment, management, and treatment of suicidal patients is one of the most stressful tasks for clinicians. An array of risk factors, warning signs, and protective factors associated with suicide risk are reviewed; however, we are not yet in possession of evidence-based diagnostic tests that can accurately predict suicide risk on an individual level without also creating an inordinate number of false-positive predictions. Given the current limitations of assessment strategies, clinicians are advised to keep in mind that patients contemplating suicide are under enormous psychological distress, requiring sensitive and thoughtful engagement during the assessment process. An overarching goal of these assessments should be conducted within the therapeutic frame, in which efforts are made to enhance the therapeutic alliance by negotiating a collaborative approach to assessing risk and understanding why thoughts of suicide are so compelling. Within this treatment heuristic, the Suicide Assessment Five-step Evaluation and Triage (SAFE-T) is recommended as a pragmatic multidimensional assessment protocol incorporating the best known risk and protective factors.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Suicide Risk Assessment in Clinical Practice:
Pragmatic Guidelines for Imperfect Assessments
James Christopher Fowler
Baylor College of Medicine
This practice review focuses on the challenges of conducting sensitive and accurate assessments of the
relative risk for suicide attempts and completed suicides. Suicide and suicide attempts are a frequently
encountered clinical crisis, and the assessment, management, and treatment of suicidal patients is one of
the most stressful tasks for clinicians. An array of risk factors, warning signs, and protective factors
associated with suicide risk are reviewed; however, we are not yet in possession of evidence-based
diagnostic tests that can accurately predict suicide risk on an individual level without also creating an
inordinate number of false-positive predictions. Given the current limitations of assessment strategies,
clinicians are advised to keep in mind that patients contemplating suicide are under enormous psycho-
logical distress, requiring sensitive and thoughtful engagement during the assessment process. An
overarching goal of these assessments should be conducted within the therapeutic frame, in which efforts
are made to enhance the therapeutic alliance by negotiating a collaborative approach to assessing risk and
understanding why thoughts of suicide are so compelling. Within this treatment heuristic, the Suicide
Assessment Five-step Evaluation and Triage (SAFE-T) is recommended as a pragmatic multidimensional
assessment protocol incorporating the best known risk and protective factors.
Keywords: suicide assessment, risk factors, alliance
Psychotherapists have much to worry about: Turf battles over
medication prescription privileges, third party reimbursement, and
the ongoing quest for mental health parity. Closer to the consulting
room, we worry about patient’s psychological well-being, im-
provement, and safety—of greatest concern is their short and
long-term risk for suicidal behavior and death. Clinicians have
reason for concern: As death rates decline for many medical
conditions, suicide rates have risen approximately 60% over the
last 45 years, with yearly estimates of 1 million suicides worldwide
(World Health Organization, 2005). In the United States more than
32,000 suicides occurred annually—Suicide is the second leading
cause of death among 25 to 34 year olds, and the third leading cause
of death for people between the ages of 15 and 24 (Centers for
Disease Control, 2007). Suicide attempts are 10 to 40 times greater
than completed suicides, with US estimates nearing 650,000 per year
(Goldsmith, Pellmar, Kleinman, & Bunney, 2002).
Suicide and suicide attempts are a frequently encountered clin-
ical crisis, and the assessment, management, and treatment of
suicidal patients is one of the most stressful tasks for clinicians
(Jobes, 1995). According to survey data, 28% of psychologists and
62% of psychiatrists reported experienced the loss of a patient to
suicide, most frequently in outpatient settings (Chemtob, Bauer,
Hamada, Pelowski, & Muraoka, 1989). The stress and anxiety
associated with treating suicidal patients can, at times, lead clini-
cians to lose sight of the primary objective of psychotherapy
(namely the relief of suffering through greater self-understanding
and improvement in social functioning). Powerful emotional reac-
tions to a suicidal patient can fuel a pattern of defensive behavioral
management that runs the risk of eclipsing the patients suffering,
leading to subtle and overt power struggles. In some cases, a
pattern of chronic crisis management can emerge in which the
clinician adopts a role of a constant savior (Hendin, 1991). Al-
though it is first and foremost necessary to protect the life of the
patient, clinicians must guard against the treatment devolving into
chronic crisis management in which the mutually agreed upon
purpose of the treatment is inadvertently jettisoned. Therefore, the
overarching goal of any assessment of suicide risk should be
conducted within a therapeutic frame in which collaboration and
negotiation of role responsibilities are clearly articulated (Plakun,
1994). At the same time clinicians must work to enhance the
therapeutic alliance by negotiating a collaborative approach to
understanding why thoughts of suicide are so compelling (Jobes,
Louma, Jacoby & Mann, 1998; Jobes, 2011).
The scope, breadth, and volume of suicide research precludes an
exhaustive review of the literature, and any attempt to do so here
would certainly do injustice to the field of suicidology, and subvert
the purpose of this article—those interested in a deeper examina-
tion may find the reference list and a list of hyperlinks (Table 1)
useful. This practice review will focus on three elements: (1)
Challenges facing clinicians assessing risk for adult patients, (2)
An overview of the best predictors of suicide risk, and (3) Prag-
matic recommendations for ongoing risk assessment that places a
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to J. Chris-
topher Fowler, PhD, Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral
Sciences Baylor College of Medicine, 2801 Gessner Drive, Houston, TX
77080. E-mail:
Psychotherapy © 2012 American Psychological Association
2012, Vol. 49, No. 1, 81–90 0033-3204/12/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0026148
premium on maintaining a collaborative therapeutic frame, attend-
ing to the therapeutic alliance as well as alliance ruptures, and
maintaining an active curiosity regarding the triggers for the sui-
cidal crisis.
Challenges to Suicide Assessment
Effectively assessing suicide risk is dependent on the availabil-
ity of sensitive and specific measures of long-term risk factors,
short-term warning signs, and an appreciation for the complexity
and variability of suicide risk over time. Unlike many diagnostic
procedures assessing relatively stable phenomena, we do not yet
possess a single test, or panel of tests that accurately identifies the
emergence of a suicide crisis. Among the many reason is that
suicide risk is fluid, highly state-dependent, and variable over time
(Rudd, 2006). It should not be a terrible shock, then, to realize that
most of our research efforts to diagnose risk for suicide and suicide
attempts fall short. Historically, research demonstrates statistical
associations among various risk factors aggregated across large
groups of individuals; however, translating elevated risk to the
single individual falters because specific predictors are found
among many individuals who are not suicidal (resulting in high
false-positive prediction).
Thus, despite decades of research, accurate prediction of suicide
and suicide attempts remains elusive. The American Psychiatric
Association (APA) Guidelines on Suicidal Behavior (APA, 2003)
concluded that predicting suicide appears impossible in large part
due to the rarity of suicide, even among high-risk individuals such
as psychiatric inpatients. Beyond statistical challenges posed by
low base rates, longitudinal prediction using relatively distal vari-
ables such as psychiatric diagnoses, demographics, and self-
reported psychological states consistently yield high false-positive
prediction rates, limiting their predictive value (Goldsmith et al.,
2002; Rudd et al., 2006; Oquendo, Halberstam, & Mann, 2003).
Complicating the assessment strategy is the fact that most studies
assess single risk factors, leaving clinicians and expert panels to
estimate how risk factors interact to influence outcomes.
While prediction appears unlikely at this stage, clinicians are
nonetheless responsible for assessing suicide risk, and for provid-
ing treatment to decrease risk (APA, 2003). Modifiable risk factors
include the short-term safety of patients, and treating psychiatric
symptoms/disorders using evidence-based treatments. Among the
hundreds of interventions for suicidality, the following treatments
appear particularly effective in randomized clinical control trials:
lithium prophylaxis for mood disorders (Baldessarini et al., 2006),
clozapine for psychotic disorders (Glick et al., 2004; Meltzer et al.,
2003), psychosocial treatments for suicidal patients with border-
line personality disorder (Bateman & Fonagy, 2008; Clarkin,
Levy, Lenzenweger, & Kernberg, 2007; Doering et al., 2010; Levy
et al., 2006; Linehan et al., 2006), and outreach via communicating
caring and concern remotely (Motto & Bostrom, 2001; Fleish-
mann, Bertolote, Wasserman et al., 2008) or in-home psychody-
namic consultations (Guthrie et al., 2001).
The aforementioned psychosocial interventions demonstrate the
efficacy of developing and maintaining a caring interpersonal
contact (even if by letter or phone) in reducing suicide risk. As will
be discussed in a later section, the quality of social relationships
can either serve as a protective or risk factor, and it stands to
reason that the quality of a collaborative therapeutic relationship,
the clinician’s ongoing care and interest in the patient, and efforts
to repair ruptures in the alliance may exert a powerful influence on
the patient’s degree of hope for the future, and the degree to which
suicidal related behaviors decrease. Recent open trials of a suicide
prevention strategy based on collaboration, therapeutic alliance,
and enhancing social contacts reduced rates of suicidality (Ellis,
Green, Allen, Jobes, & Nadorff, in press; Jobes, Wong, Conrad,
Drozd, & Neal-Walden, 2005; Jobes, Kahn-Greene, Greene, &
Goeke-Morey, 2009). It is therefore recommended that clinicians
work to enhance the therapeutic alliance, consider recent ruptures
that may contribute to suicidal ideation, and work to develop a
collaborative approach to understanding the underlying causes for
suicidal ideation (Jobes, 2011). With this practice heuristic in
mind, the brief review of suicide research will touch on the
evidence for those risk and protective factors with the strongest
evidence base, then turn to a pragmatic and clinically sensitive
approach to discussing suicide risk with patients.
Static Risk Factors for Suicide and Suicide Attempts
Suicide research began, and for the most part continues to focus
on single, static risk factors such as demographic factors, psychi-
atric diagnoses, past high-risk behaviors, and more recently, ge-
Table 1
Selected Resources for Suicide Assessment and Suicide Facts
American Association of Suicidology
American Psychiatric Association Practice Guidelines for the
Assessment and Treatment of Patients with Suicidal
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP)
International Association for Suicide Prevention:
IASP Guidelines for suicide prevention
National Suicide Prevention Resource Center
Risk Management Foundation Harvard Medical Institutions
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) Suicide Assessment Five-Step Evaluation and
Triage (SAFE-T)–4432
Suicide Awareness Voices of Education
Suicide Prevention International
Suicide Prevention Resource Center
WHO Suicide Prevention
netic markers. Researchers contribute an impressive list of factors
demonstrating the presence of specific signs or markers that in-
crease the odds of suicide and suicide attempt—Table 2 includes a
sample of static risk factors associated with increase risk. A good
example of the epidemiological research is the cross-national sur-
vey of 84,850 adults assessing sociodemographic and psychiatric
risk factors for suicidal behaviors. Results indicated that being
younger than 25 years of age, female, less educated, unmarried,
and having a mental disorder (mood disorders in high income
countries, and impulse disorders in middle and low income coun-
tries) each imparted a degree of risk for suicide-related behaviors,
with risk increasing with greater psychiatric comorbidity (Nock,
Borges, Bromet et al., 2008). From epidemiologic and social
policy perspectives, this information may be useful in developing
targeted programs for intervention and prevention; yet, distal data
alone are marginally helpful to clinicians—the odds of any of these
factors predicting suicide-related behaviors is relatively low, with
excessively high false-positive rates for each risk factor.
Retrospective and psychological autopsy studies indicate that a
diagnosable mental illness is present in at least 90% of all completed
suicides (Isometsa et al., 1995; Rich, Young, & Fowler, 1986; Con-
well et al., 1996). Clinicians and researchers have long presumed that
some psychiatric disorders convey greater risk for suicide than others.
Harris and Barraclough (1998) found increased suicide risk for all
psychiatric disorders except mental retardation. Suicide mortality
rates were highest for individuals diagnosed with substance abuse and
eating disorders, moderately high rates for mood and personality
disorders, and relatively low rates for anxiety disorders (Harris &
Barraclough, 1998). The difficulty with such evidence is the fact that
the majority of individuals suffering from psychiatric disorders never
make a suicide attempt. Furthermore, over 70% of individuals with a
psychiatric disorder have co-occurring disorders (Kessler et al., 2003),
making prediction based on single diagnoses somewhat spurious.
Efforts to assess comorbidity and severity of psychiatric disor-
ders demonstrate some promising trends. Recent evidence from a
10-year prospective study of suicidal ideation, suicide plans and
attempts revealed that the total number of co-occurring psychiatric
disorders was consistently more predictive of subsequent suicide-
related behaviors than types of disorders (Borges, Angst, Nock,
Ruscio, & Kessler, 2008). A 3-year prospective study revealed that
individuals with comorbid substance abuse disorders and BPD
were more likely to make future suicide attempts (Yen et al.,
2003). Soloff and Fabio (2008) found that comorbid major depres-
sion and BPD, in combination with poor social adjustment was
predictive of suicide attempts at 12-month follow-up. Severity of
personality pathology (defined as meeting criteria for two or more
personality disorders) was correlated with recurrent suicide at-
tempts, but this effect held true only for younger females with
severe personality disorders (Blasco-Fontecilla et al., 2009).
Efforts to predict suicide using finer grain psychiatric variables
such as previous hospitalization, depression, hopelessness, bipolar
disorder, psychotic spectrum disorders, impulsivity, and plans or
thoughts of dying fail to provide sensitive and specific metrics to
function as diagnostic tests (even when combined in risk factor
algorithms). For example, the 5-year prospective study predicting
suicide risk among 4800 psychiatric inpatients found the follow-
ing: During the follow-up period the best algorithm correctly
identify 35 of 63 future suicides; yet, 1206 false positive predic-
tions resulted in a positive prediction value of less than 3%, thus
diminishing the prospect of utilizing the algorithm for diagnostic
purposes (Pokorny, 1983). Focusing on 743 subjects identified as
a high-risk cohort, the results were only slightly improved: the
algorithm correctly identify 21 out of 28 future suicides; yet, 164
false positive predictions resulted in a positive prediction value of
approximately 11 percent.
Assessment of psychological vulnerabilities (an even finer
grained analysis) seemed a logical approach, yet a review of
empirical literature yielded mixed results for the most consistently
studied psychological constructs of impulsivity/aggression, de-
pression, anxiety, hopelessness, and self-consciousness/social dis-
engagement (Conner, Duberstien, Conwell, Seidlitz & Caine,
2001). While impulsivity/aggression has a substantial genetic load-
ing, and shows strong family affinity in those whose family mem-
bers have made suicide attempts, there are a number of factors that
Table 2
Selected Static Risk Factors Associated With Individual Risk for Suicide and Suicide Attempts
Variable Relative predictive strength False-positive risk
Past suicide attempts Strongest consistent predictor for both suicide attempts and completed suicide across
many studies Moderate-high
Co-morbid psychiatric diagnoses Risk increases with greater co-morbidity, especially for substance, mood and personality
disorders High
Single diagnoses Eating disorders, and substance abuse disorders carry the highest risk, mood, and
personality disorders carry moderately high risk, anxiety disorders carry lower risk High
Severity of mental illness Limited studies suggest severity of impairment may be a risk factor beyond the specific
diagnosis High
Algorithms of multiple domains Diagnoses, symptoms, demographic and past history of hospitalization result in
moderate true positive prediction but high false positive High
Psychological vulnerabilities Impulsivity/aggression, depressive symptoms, anxiety, hopelessness, and
self-consciousness/social disengagement increase risk, yet some studies are
Genetic markers 5-HTT serotonin gene most studied with moderate association: other candidate genes
vary by study Unknown
Demographic (gender, age, race,
economic status) Males complete more suicides, females attempt more, nonmarried marital status, elderly,
adolescent and young adult age groups, and Caucasian race are all associated with
increase risk
Extremely high
affect that association, thus reduce the predictive validity of this
single risk factor (Turecki, 2005).
Currently, the strongest risk factor for predicting suicide and
suicide-related behavior is the history of suicide attempts. While
some distinctive clinical and psychological features differentiate
those who attempt suicide from those who die from suicide; most
experts agree that a history of suicide attempt(s) is the greatest risk
factor for future attempts, and death by suicide (Brown, Comtois,
& Linehan, 2002; Cavanagh, Owens, & Johnstone, 1999; Joiner et
al., 2005). Medically serious suicide attempts are strongly associ-
ated with the increased risk of mortality and repeated suicide
attempts: a 5-year follow-up study found that individuals who
made a single suicide attempt were 48 times more likely to die by
suicide than the average person (Beautrais, 2004). In a recent
Finnish epidemiological study of 18,199 cases of suicide attempt,
the risk of repeated attempted suicide within 5 years was 30% and
the risk of death by suicide was 10% (Haukka, Suominen, Par-
tonen, & Lonnqvist, 2008). Suicide attempts confer considerable
future risk, but the risk is far from absolute—calculating false-
positive predictions from Haukka’s data (2008), we find 12,739
false positive predictions for future suicide attempts, and 16,379
false-positive predictions for completed suicide when using past
suicide attempt as the sole predictor.
The promise of genetic markers for predicting suicide and
suicide attempt (including the extensively studied serotonin trans-
porter gene 5-HTTLPR) has yet to be fully realized (Arango,
Huang, Underwood, & Mann, 2003). This may be due to gene-
environment interactions influenced by the cascade of early ad-
verse events on neurological development, and adult response to
stressful life events (Currier & Mann, 2008). The lesson to date is
that no single static risk factor provides an adequate diagnostic tool
for assessing future risk given the unmanageable number of false-
positive predictions.
Proximal Warning Signs
The American Association of Suicidology formed a work group
to address problems associated with detecting suicide risk, recog-
nizing that static, distal risk factors fail to provide adequate diag-
nostic clarity. A research agenda was proposed to focus on near-
term indicators of imminent suicide risk (Rudd, Berman, Joiner et
al., 2006). Whereas risk factors are generally static, warning signs
such as thoughts of suicide, preparatory acts, stressful life events,
and cognitive/affective states are episodic, and therefore may be
more predictive of an imminent suicidal crisis. Table 3 includes a
selection of proximal warning signs associated with increased risk.
Self-report measures and interview strategies for assessing
warning signs of suicidal ideation, intent, and availability of means
have generally failed to produce the anticipated diagnostic clarity
and appear better suited for screening out suicide risk (for exten-
sive reviews of self-report and interview approaches, see Brown,
2002, and Nock, Wedig, Janis, & Deliberto, 2008). Despite the
apparent ubiquity of suicidal ideation before suicide attempts, the
relationship is complicated—most individuals contemplating sui-
cide do so for extended periods without following through on the
thoughts. A closer examination of the 10-year prospective study
cited earlier (Borges, Angst, Nock, Ruscio, & Kessler, 2008)
highlights the limited predictive utility of suicidal ideation: Using
data from two National Comorbidity Surveys, 5001 subjects were
interviewed regarding suicidal ideation, suicidal plans, gestures,
and serious attempts. Suicide ideation was predictive of future
suicidal ideation, but was negatively related to risk of future
suicide attempt in the absence of a past plan or attempt. Further-
more, past suicide plans predicted the likelihood of future suicidal
ideation and suicide plans, but not future attempts—only a history
of prior suicide attempt was significantly and positively related to
future suicide attempt (Borges, Angst, Nock, Ruscio, & Kessler,
2008). The results of a second study are chilling: a prospective
study of 76 psychiatric inpatients found that 78% of individuals
who completed suicide had denied suicidal ideation or intent
during their last human contact before their death (Busch, Fawcett,
& Jacobs, 2003).
Increasingly, researchers are questioning the reliance on self-
report from suicidal individuals who may be motivated to dissim-
ulate, are unable to accurately assess their emotional states, or are
Table 3
Selected Warning Signs Associated With Individual Risk for Suicide and Suicide Attempts
Variable Relative predictive strength False-positive risk
Suicidal ideation/plan Suicidal ideation is assumed to be present in the majority of suicide attempts
and completed suicides; however, suicide attempters frequently deny
suicidal ideation prior to attempt, and many individuals have suicidal
thoughts without making attempts
Stressful life events Stressful life events involving interpersonal loss, humiliation, betrayal, and/
or involve legal issues are associated with increase risk, but this effect
tends to be true for those with genetic and psychological vulnerabilities
Implicit measures assessing
suicide-related outcomes Implicit cognitive and affective measures, as well as interview approaches
focusing on intense affect states are predictive of later suicide related
behaviors with relatively low false positive prediction. Limited studies and
small samples
Gene X stressful life events Promising results linking 5HTTPLR-SS and number of stressful life events
to later onset of depression and suicide attempt. More studies needed Unknown
Posthospitalization transition Suicide rates spike immediately following discharge from psychiatric
hospitalization, and remain high during the first week and first month
following discharge. Patients who make unilateral decisions to discharge
are at greater risk
poor prognosticators of future risk (Hendin, Maltsberger & Szanto,
2007; Nock & Banaji, 2007). Several research teams investigating
short-term risk circumvent problems associated with self-report
bias by developing computer-based measures that assess implicit
psychological processes (Cha, Najmi, Park, Finn, & Nock, 2010;
Nock & Benaji, 2007), use interview strategies focusing on current
affective states while intentionally avoiding reference to suicide
(Hendin et al., 2007; Hendin, Al Jurdi, Houck, Haas, & Turner,
2010), or extract dimensions of cognition and affective functioning
using the Rorschach Inkblot Method (Affra, 1982; Exner & Wiley,
1977; Fowler, Piers, Hilsenroth, Holdwick, & Padawer, 2001;
Fowler, Hilsenroth & Piers, 2001; Fowler et al., under review;
Silberg & Armstrong, 1992). These indirect measures show con-
siderable predictive validity with uncharacteristically low levels of
false-positive prediction. Of considerable importance is the fact
that two implicit measures (Cha et al., 2010; Fowler et al., in press)
demonstrated incremental validity over and above a history of past
suicide attempt.
Stressful life events, particularly those involving loss or threat to
the stability of interpersonal relationships are associated with
suicide risk (Heikkinen et al., 1997; Paykel, Prusoff, & Myers,
1975). More recently, researchers from the Collaborative Longi-
tudinal Personality Disorders Study examined the link between
personality disorders and specific negative life events in the month
preceding a suicide attempt—those who made attempts were more
likely to have experienced a negative stressful life event related to
love and marriage problems, or legal troubles such as incarceration
(Yen et al., 2005). This held true even after controlling for baseline
diagnoses of BPD, major depressive disorders, substance use dis-
orders, and history of childhood sexual abuse.
Psychiatric hospitalization may function as a stressful life event,
despite the intended purpose of decreasing suicide risk. Numerous
studies demonstrate that risk of future suicide is greater shortly
after admission and discharge (Appleby et al., 1999; Goldacre,
Seagroatt, & Hawton, 1993; Rossau & Mortensen, 1997). While
hospitalization is likely a proxy for sustained suicide crisis, one
study sheds light on the risks involved in admissions that are too
brief—using Danish national registries, Qin and Nordentoft
(2005) examined the temporal relationships among hospitalization
and suicide risk, discovering that suicide risk spikes immediately
after admission and 1-week postdischarge, and the risk of suicide
is greatest for individuals with hospital stays less than the national
median (estimated at 17 days). A second study (Hunt et al., 2009)
found that the first day, first week, and first month postdischarge
were the highest risk periods, and were strongly associated with
patient-initiated discharge and failure to follow-up with postdis-
charge care, but not duration of hospitalization. This suggests that
patients discharging from hospital against the recommendations of
the attending physician, and without adequate planning or
follow-up care may be motivated to flee the protective constraints
of a hospital unit.
Diathesis-Stress Models of Risk
There is growing consensus among researchers that suicide risk
is best conceptualized as a complex diathesis-stress phenomenon.
Most theories posit an underlying genetic vulnerability that is
triggered by early adverse events, resulting in impaired develop-
ment and function of neurobiological systems regulating behavior,
affect, and cognitive function. Impairments in stress response
systems may then be overwhelmed (during adolescence and adult-
hood) in response to episodic negative life events, increasing the
likelihood of triggering a suicidal crisis. Thus, underlying genetic
and psychological vulnerabilities are assumed to be triggered by
environmental stressors, increasing likelihood of negative out-
comes including suicidal behavior (Currier & Mann, 2008; Mann,
Waternaux, Haas, & Malone, 1999; Turecki, 2005; Rudd, 2006).
Studies generally support diathesis-stress models for predicting
suicide risk—interactions between early adverse events and cur-
rent impulsivity (Brodsky et al., 2001) loneliness and recent stress-
ful life events (Chang, Sanna, Hirsch, & Jeglic, 2010), and level of
psychopathology and recent stressful life events in alcoholics
(Conner, Beautrais & Conwell, 2003) confer increase risk of
suicide-related behaviors. Diathesis-stress models appear to impart
added risk for suicide above and beyond assessment of these
factors in isolation. The one exception is individuals who have
made multiple suicide attempts in which stressful life events did
not correlate with intensity of suicide crisis (Joiner & Rudd, 2000).
Multiple suicide attempts may lead to habituation by reducing
normal barriers such as pain, fear of death, and negative social
consequences (Joiner, 2005).
An intriguing gene-environment study demonstrated a link be-
tween the serotonin transporter functional promoter polymorphism
(5-HTTLPR), recent stressful life events, and suicide-related be-
havior (Caspi et al., 2003). In this study, a combination of four or
more stressful life events was associated with increased suicidal
ideation and attempts for individuals with two copies of the short
form of the 5-HTTLPR gene, but had minimal effect on those with
two long forms of the gene.
Protective Factors
Pathological risk factors dominate suicide research, and yet
protective factors that impart a degree of resilience against suicidal
behaviors are crucial because the interplay of risk and protective
factors may ultimately determine the outcome for individuals
(Goldsmith et al., 2002). It is curious why protective factors were
not more salient in earlier studies because clinicians routinely
work to enhance modifiable protective factors when treating sui-
cidal patients. With the rise of the positive psychology movement
and greater emphasis on resilience as a viable psychological con-
struct, protective factors are increasingly included in studies, but
the measurement and mechanisms of specific protective factors
remain unclear. Some leading protective factors are discussed in
the following section (Table 4).
The ability to maintain a cognitive set regarding reasons for
living appears to function as a protective factor (Malone et al.,
2000; Linehan, Goodstein, Nielsen, & Chiles, 1983). For example,
in a cross-sectional study, depressed patients who had not previ-
ously attempted suicide were found to have expressed more feel-
ings of responsibility toward their children and families, feared
social disapproval, had more moral objections to suicide, greater
survival and coping skills, as well as greater fear of suicide than a
matched cohort of depressed patients who had previously at-
tempted suicide (Malone et al., 2000). In a 2-year prospective
study, reasons for living were a protective factor against future
suicide attempts among depressed female inpatients, but not for
their male counterparts (Lizardi et al., 2007). Healthy and well-
developed coping skills may provide a buffer against stressful life
events, decreasing the likelihood of suicidal behavior (Josepho &
Plutchik, 1994).
Among protective factors, moral objections and strength of
religious convictions appear protective. In general, individuals are
less likely to act on suicidal thoughts when they hold strong
religious convictions and a belief that suicide is morally incom-
patible with belief (APA, 2003; Maris, 1981; Neeleman, Wessley
& Lewis, 1998). Religious and spiritual beliefs and techniques may
decrease suicide risk by providing coping strategies and a sense of
hope and purpose (APA, 2003). Involvement in religious organiza-
tions may also increase resiliency by enhancing more stable support-
ive social networks (Pescosolido & Georgianna, 1989).
Marriage imparts a degree of protection against suicide
(Kposowa, 2000; Kreitman, 1988; Smith, Mercy, & Conn, 1988),
yet the presence of a high-conflict or violent marriage can function
as a risk factor (APA, 2003). Pregnancy is also a time of signifi-
cantly reduced suicide risk for healthy women (Harris & Barra-
clough, 1998); however, risk is significantly greater for pregnant
teenagers, pregnant women of lower socioeconomic status, and
women who are psychiatrically hospitalized postpartum (Appleby,
Mortensen, & Faragher, 1998; Yonkers et al., 2001). For women,
the presence of children in the home may provide an additional
protective effect (Marzuk et al., 1997; Qin & Mortensen, 2003;
Nock, Borges, Bromet et al., 2008). Curiously, while having
children in the home is a protective factor against suicide and
suicide attempts, it increases the likelihood of suicidal ideation,
suggestive of marked stress involved in child rearing (Nock,
Borges, Bromet et al., 2008).
With national focus of bullying and adolescent suicide, consid-
erable research interest is now trained on the social environment
and social supports (or lack thereof) for teens. In a reanalysis of a
national survey of adolescents, Winfree and Jiang (2010) found
that feeling safe at school was one of the most consistent protective
factors against suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Strong fam-
ily attachment when coupled with a cohesive neighborhood net-
work also reduces the risk of adolescent suicide attempts (Maimon,
Browning, & Brooks-Gunn, 2010).
One of the prime, modifiable protective factors is the experience
of positive supportive relationships between patient and clinician
(APA, 2003). Clinicians of all theoretical persuasions work to
establish and enhance a positive therapeutic relationship, and many
focus significant attention on improving the quality of communi-
cation in marital and family relationships through individual, cou-
ples, and family therapy. A number of randomized clinical trials
demonstrate the efficacy of interventions providing a caring and
concerned social support through letters, phone contacts, or brief
interviews in reducing suicide-related behaviors (Motto & Bos-
trom, 2001; Fleischmann et al., 2008; Guthrie et al., 2001). The
collaborative assessment and management of suicidality interven-
tion (CAMS; Jobes et al., 1998; Jobes, 2011) is a suicide-specific
manualized treatment to help patients and clinicians to establish
and maintain a therapeutic alliance while the pair works to under-
stand the meanings and functions of suicidal ideation. Open trials
of CAMS demonstrate decreased suicidality among outpatients
(Jobes et al., 2005) and psychiatric inpatients (Ellis et al., 2011).
Thus numerous studies identify therapeutic, family, and social
relationships as protective, but the quality and stability of relation-
ship and social structures appear to determine the valence as a
protective or risk factor.
Pragmatic Approaches to Risk Assessment
When initiating treatment with high-risk patients, it is best to
negotiate a collaborative treatment approach to suicidal thoughts
and behaviors that includes, (1) a clear plan for de-escalating a
suicidal crisis, (2) negotiation of the mutual and individual respon-
sibilities of clinician and patient in establishing and maintaining
the patient’s safety, and (3) agreement to explore the precipitants
and meaning of the crisis once it has past (Jobes, 2011). The
CAMS approach is one systematic method to help patients and
Table 4
Selected Protective Factors Associated With Individual Risk for Suicide and Suicide Attempts
Variable Relative predictive strength
Religious affiliation/beliefs Strength of religious conviction, social supports, and spiritual practices serving as coping strategies all serve as
protective factors
Reasons for living Incorporates aspects of social and religious/moral protective factors into a single scale. Demonstrates protective
factor in cross sectional studies of adult and adolescents, but was only protective for females in a
prospective study of depressed inpatients
Marriage Protective factor except in the presence of a high-conflict or violent relationship when marriage becomes a risk
Children in the home Protective factor except in the cases of post-partum mood or psychotic disorders, teen pregnancy, and extreme
economic hardships. Children in the home increase risk of suicidal ideation, suggesting heightened emotional
strain associated with childrearing
Supportive social networks Religious organizations, close familial ties, supportive school and neighborhood environments have been linked
to decreased risk of suicide attempts
Therapeutic contacts Randomized clinical trials of psychosocial treatments of Borderline Personality disorder reduce suicide
attempts and hospitalizations. The Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality intervention
reduces suicidality in open trials
Psychotropic medications Randomized clinical trials of lithium prophylaxis for mood disorders and clozapine for psychotic disorders
reduce suicide attempts
Brief supportive contacts Randomized clinical trials demonstrate reduced occurrence of suicide attempts using outreach via
communicating caring and concern remotely or in-home psychodynamic consultations
clinicians address these issues and to establish and maintain a thera-
peutic alliance while working to understand the meanings and func-
tions of suicidal ideation. The centrality of collaboration and negoti-
ation within the context of the therapeutic alliance helps clinician and
patient avoid power struggles, rescue fantasies, pathological depen-
dency, and false compliance. If suicidality emerges in course of
treatment, CAMS or other treatment heuristics can be implemented,
but the immediate issue of assessment and intervention remains.
Given the fact that the accuracy of suicide risk assessment is less
than perfect, what is a clinician to do when faced with assessing
suicidal patients? Knowing that patients frequently deny suicidal
thoughts before suicide attempt and death, clinicians should re-
main appropriately circumspect regarding declarations of safety
when a patient recently expressed suicidal ideation, feelings of
hopeless, desperation, and/or affective flooding. This does not
mean we should adopt a suspicious or adversarial stance—on the
contrary, curiosity, concern, and calm acceptance of the patient’s
emotional and cognitive states may serve to enhance the therapeu-
tic alliance, encourage the patient to directly explore her or his
current distress, and aid in the accurate evaluation of current
functioning. In this way, a positive and cooperative therapeutic
relationship can serve as ballast against suicidal urges (APA,
2003). At the same time, the clinician must be mindful of personal
reactions that can lead to nontherapeutic (re)actions such as con-
veying an adversarial or hostile tone, taking on a savior role,
blurring professional boundaries, and avoidance or overcompen-
sation for negative feelings that emerge (Hendin, 1991; Malts-
berger & Buie, 1980).
Before conducting a formal suicide assessment, clinicians
should conduct an introspective review of recent stressful life
events facing the patient, including recent ruptures in the thera-
peutic alliance, and disturbances in social relationships (Truscott,
Evans, & Knish, 1999). Maintaining a therapeutic stance of curi-
osity and concern (while simultaneously remaining open to the
possibility that an alliance rupture may be a precipitant to the
crisis) is difficult to sustain when anxieties are running high;
however, communicating genuine curiosity and concern about the
causes for their unbearable suffering is critical.
Although risk factors and measures rarely provide consistent
evidence of efficient diagnostic tests, experts generally agree that
a multidimensional assessment incorporating the best known risk
and protective factors is the most reasonable course of action
(APA, 2003; Brown, 2002; Goldsmith et al., 2002; Nock, Wedig,
Janis et al., 2008; Rudd et al., 2006; Oquendo et al., 2003). While
several systems exist, few provide guidelines for summarizing
findings, provide heuristics for benchmarking risk, and fewer
suggest interventions when heightened risk is the outcome. A
notable exception is the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration sponsored Suicide Assessment Five-step
Evaluation and Triage (SAFE-T; go to:
product/SMA09-4432 to download or order a free pocket guide).
Derived from data and recommendations from the American Psy-
chiatric Association Practice Guidelines (2003), the SAFE-T is a
comprehensive, practical, and efficient assessment strategy that
partially overcomes the limitations of single risk factors by includ-
ing recent stressful life events and current patterns of ideation and
motivation for suicide, while providing the necessary counter-
weight of protective factors that may mitigate the likelihood of
suicidal behavior in some individuals. Clinicians working with
high-risk individuals are guided through the following steps: (1)
identifying relevant risk factors (noting those that are modifiable
and therefore targeted for treatment), (2) identifying protective
factors, (3) conducting a suicide inquiry including current suicidal
thoughts, plans, behavior, and intent, (4) determining level of risk
and select interventions to reduce risk, and (5) documenting the
assessment of risk, the rationale for the chosen interventions, and
follow-up after assessment and interventions.
Assessments are conducted at first contact and whenever the
clinician anticipates that risk may be elevated. Clinicians assess
static risk factors such as history of abuse, history of suicide
attempts, diagnostic risk factors, family history of suicide attempts,
as well as presenting symptoms of anhedonia, impulsivity, hope-
lessness, insomnia, and command hallucinations. Warning signs
are incorporated into the assessment including potentially trigger-
ing events of loss, humiliation, current family chaos, and spikes in
alcohol abuse and intoxication. Protective factors such as internal
coping resources, religious beliefs, and external reasons for living
(responsibility for children, positive therapeutic relationships, and
social supports) provide ballast for risk factors, but are considered
minimally influential when strong risk factors and triggering
events are present. Following a thorough evaluation of risk and
protective factors, clinicians should conduct a sensitive inquiry into
current suicidal ideation, plan, behaviors (such as rehearsals and
preparation), taking pains to express concern and attending to the
alliance in order to communicate caring and maximize the likelihood
of accurate reports. Determining relative risk must rely on the clini-
cian’s judgment in weighing the combination of risk and protective
factors, assessing the patient’s social supports, the state of the thera-
peutic alliance, and the patient’s sense of desperation.
Once the assessment is complete, clinicians can benchmark the
results against the SAFE-T guidelines for relative risk (high,
moderate, low). Determining interventions (including medication
consult, providing additional psychosocial supports, developing a
crisis plan, providing emergency phone number/crisis hotline num-
bers, and hospitalization) should be negotiated, if possible, with
the patient as a partner in the decision making process. The risk
level and rationale for the treatment plan to address and reduce
current risk and any plans for follow-up assessments should be
clearly and concisely documented. Resources for documentation of
risk are available at:
When clinicians face a potential suicide crisis, they are multi-
tasking and are usually in a state of heightened alert and anxiety.
Under such stressful circumstances, it is easy to get swept up in
personal emotional reactions and lose sight of the patient’s suffer-
ing and their efforts to communicate distress. Conducting the
SAFE-T or other multidimensional assessments requires not only
thorough evaluative skills, it requires the clinician’s skill in com-
municating caring and concern, active curiosity about the precip-
itants, and the role of enhancing the alliance, or repairing alliance
ruptures in de-escalating crises.
Diagnostic tests for accurately predicting individual level risk
remain elusive; yet, several research developments hold consider-
able promise, such as combining measures from multiple domains
and using implicit measures of affect and cognition that circum-
vent some of the limitations of self-report approaches. Researchers
and clinicians will continue to search for markers that may hold the
key for developing a truly sensitive and accurate diagnostic test or
panel that can alert clinicians to ongoing vulnerability and immi-
nent heightened risk.
Throughout this review emphasis has been placed on exceed-
ingly high false-positive rates as a limiting step to individual
patient suicide risk assessment, and many suicide experts imply
that false positive predictions are the unfortunate cost of such
assessments. While patient safety is the prime objective, there are
unanticipated consequences to suspending another person’s basic
civil rights when hospitalizing patients (especially when based on
inaccurate data from suicide assessments). Unnecessary hospital-
ization can lead to a sense of betrayal, alliance ruptures, unilateral
termination of treatment, and conceivably, an inadvertent stressful
life event that increases future suicide risk.
Given these high stakes, clinicians are advised to negotiate how
the therapeutic pair will deal with suicidal ideation, preferably well
in advance of a crisis. Discussing the possible interventions in the
event of a suicide crisis, and negotiating a strategy may help the
patient take some authority and ownership over decisions, and may
ultimately mitigate the interventions being experienced as a be-
trayal. When assessment and exploration of meaning are built into
the treatment frame clinician and patient have a greater chance of
avoiding or circumventing power struggles and are in a better
position to repair alliance ruptures. Focusing on the therapeutic
relationship, and using the therapeutic alliance as a platform for
exploring the causes and meaning of suicidal thoughts, clinician
and patient may increase the likelihood of working together to
avert suicide-related outcomes.
Affra, S. (1982). Predicting adolescent suicidal behavior and the order of
Rorschach measurement. Journal Personality Assessment, 46, 563–568.
American Psychiatric Association. (2003). American Psychiatric Associa-
tion Practice Guideline for the assessment and treatment of suicidal
behaviors. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Appleby, L., Mortensen, P. B., & Faragher, E. B. (1998). Suicide and other
causes of mortality after postpartum psychiatric admission. British Jour-
nal of Psychiatry, 173, 209–221. doi:10.1192/bjp.173.3.209
Appleby, L., Shaw, J., Amos, T., McDonnell, R., Harris, C., McCann, K.,
. . . Parsons, R. (1999). Suicide within 12 months of contact with mental
health services: National clinical survey. British Medical Journal, 318,
Arango, V., Huang, Y., Underwood, M. D., & Mann, J. J. (2003). Genetics
of the serotonergic system in suicidal behavior. Journal of Psychiatric
Research, 37, 375–386. doi:10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00048-7
Baldessarini, R. J., Tondo, L., Davis, P., Pompili, M., Goodwin, F. K., &
Hennen, J. (2006). Decreased risk of suicides and attempts during
long-term lithium treatment: A meta-analytic review. Bipolar Disorder,
8, 625–639. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2006.00344.x
Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2008). 8-year follow-up of patients treated for
borderline personality disorder: Mentalization-based treatment versus
treatment as usual. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 631–638.
Beautrais, A. L. (2004). Further suicidal behavior among medically serious
suicide attempters. Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior, 34, 1–11.
Blasco-Fontecilla, H. H., Baca-Garcia, E. E., Dervic, K. K., Perez-
Rodriguez, M. M., Saiz-Gonzalez, M. D., Saiz-Ruiz, J. J., & de Leon,
J. J. (2009). Severity of personality disorders and suicide attempt. Acta
Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 119(2), 149–155. doi:10.1111/j.1600-
Borges, G., Angst, J., Nock, M. K., Ruscio, A., & Kessler, R. C. (2008).
Risk factors for the incidence and persistence of suicide-related out-
comes: A 10-year follow-up study using the National Comorbidity
Surveys. Journal of Affective Disorders, 105, 25–33.
Brodsky, B. S., Oquendo, M., Ellis, S. P., Haas, G. L., Malone, K. M., &
Mann, J. J. (2001). The relationship of childhood abuse to impulsivity
and suicidal behavior in adults with major depression. American Journal
of Psychiatry, 158, 1871–1877. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.11.1871
Brown, G. K. (2002). A review of suicide assessment measures for inter-
vention research with adults and older adults. Retrieved from http:// Retrieved November 14,
Brown, M. Z., Comtois, K. A., & Linehan, M. M. (2002). Reasons for
suicide attempts and nonsuicidal self-injury in women with borderline
personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 198–202.
Busch, K. A., Fawcett, J., & Jacobs, D. G. (2003). Clinical correlates of
inpatient suicide. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 64, 14–19. doi:
Caspi, A., Sugden, K., Moffitt, T. E., Taylor, A., Craig, I. W., Harrington,
H., . . . Poulton, R. (2003). Influence of life stress on depression:
Moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science, 301, 386
389. doi:10.1126/science.1083968
Cavanagh, J. T., Owens, D. G., & Johnstone, E. C. (1999). Suicide and
undetermined death in southeast Scotland: A case-control study using
the psychological autopsy method. Psychological Medicine, 29, 1141–
1149. doi:10.1017/S0033291799001038
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Web-based Injury
Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) [Online]. (2007).
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC (producer).
Available from
Cha, C., Najmi, S., Park, J., Finn, C., & Nock, M. (2010). Attentional bias
toward suicide-related stimuli predicts suicidal behavior. Journal of
Abnormal Psychology, 119, 616622. doi:10.1037/a0019710
Chang, E. C., Sanna, L. J., Hirsch, J. K., & Jeglic, E. L. (2010). Loneliness
and negative life events as predictors of hopelessness and suicidal
behaviors in Hispanics: Evidence for a diathesis-stress model. Journal of
Clinical Psychology, 66, 1242–1253. doi:10.1002/jclp.20721
Chemtob, C. M., Bauer, G. B., Hamada, R. S., Pelowski, S. R., & Muraoka,
M. Y. (1989). Patient suicide: Occupational hazard for psychologists and
psychiatrists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20,
294–300. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.20.5.294
Clarkin, J. F., Levy, K. N., Lenzenweger, M. F., & Kernberg, O. F. (2007).
Evaluating three treatments for borderline personality disorder: A mul-
tiwave study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 922–928. doi:
Conner, K. R., Beautrais, A. L., & Conwell, Y. (2003). Risk factors for
suicide and medically serious suicide attempts among alcoholics: Anal-
yses of Canterbury suicide project data. Journal of Studies on Alcohol,
64, 551–554.
Conner, K. R., Duberstein, P. R., Conwell, Y., Seidlitz, L., & Caine, E. D.
(2001). Psychological vulnerability to completed suicide: A review of
empirical studies. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 31, 367–385.
Conwell, Y., Duberstein, P. R., Cox, C., Herrmann, J. H., Forbes, N. T., &
Caine, E. D. (1996). Relationships of age and axis I diagnoses in victims
of completed suicide: A psychological autopsy study. American Journal
of Psychiatry, 153, 1001–1008.
Currier, D., & Mann, J. J. (2008). Stress, genes and the biology of suicidal
behavior. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 31, 247–269. doi:
Doering, S., Hörz, S., Rentrop, M., Fischer-Kern, M., Schuster, P., Be-
necke, C.,. . . Buchheim, P. (2010). Transference-focused psychotherapy
vs. treatment by community psychotherapists for borderline personality
disorder: Randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry,
196, 389–395. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.109.070177
Ellis, T. E., Green, K. L., Allen, J. G., Jobes, D. A., & Nadorff, M. (in
press). Collaborative assessment and management of suicidality in an
inpatient setting: Results of a pilot study. Psychotherapy.
Exner, J. E., & Wiley, J. (1977). Some Rorschach data concerning suicide.
Journal of Personality Assessment, 41, 339–348. doi:10.1207/
Fleischmann, A., Bertolote, J. M., Wasserman, D., De Leo, D. Bolhari, J.,
Botega, N. J., . .. Thanh, H. T. (2008). Effectiveness of brief interven-
tion and contact for suicide attempters: A randomized controlled trial in
five countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 86, 703–709.
Fowler, J. C., Hilsenroth, M. J., Groat, M., Biedermann, C., Biel, S., &
Ackerman, S. (In Press). Risk factor for medically serious suicide
attempts: Evidence for a psychodynamic formulation of suicide crisis.
Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.
Fowler, J. C., Hilsenroth, M. J., & Piers, C. (2001). An empirical study of seriously
disturbed suicidal patients. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association,
49, 161–186. doi:10.1177/00030651010490010901
Fowler, J. C., Piers, C., Hilsenroth, M. J., Holdwick, D. J., & Padawer, J. R.
(2001). The Rorschach suicide constellation: Assessing various degrees
of lethality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 333–351. doi:
Glick, I. D., Zaninelli, R., Hsu, C., Young, F. K., Weiss, L., Gunay, I., &
Kumar, V. (2004). Patterns of concomitant psychotropic medication use
during a 2-year study comparing clozapine and olanzapine for the
prevention of suicidal behavior. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 65,
679685. doi:10.4088/JCP.v65n0513
Goldacre, M., Seagroatt, V., & Hawton, K. (1993). Suicide after discharge
from psychiatric inpatient care. Lancet, 342, 283–286. doi:10.1016/
Goldsmith, S. K., Pellmar, T. C., Kleinman, A. M., & Bunney, W. E.
(2002). Reducing suicide: A national imperative (Committee on Patho-
physiology and Prevention of Adolescent and Adult Suicide, Board on
Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, Institute of Medicine of the Na-
tional Academies). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Guthrie, E., Kapur, N., Mackway-Jones, K., Chew-Graham, C., Moorey, J.,
Mendel, E., . . . Tomenson, B. (2001). Randomised controlled trial of
brief psychological intervention after deliberate self poisoning. British
Medical Journal, 323, 135–138. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7305.135
Harris, E., & Barraclough, B. (1998). Excess mortality of mental disorder:
Erratum. British Journal of Psychiatry, 173, 11–53. doi:10.1192/
Haukka, J., Suominen, K., Partonen, T., & Lonnqvist, J. (2008). Determi-
nants and outcomes of serious attempted suicide: A nationwide study in
Finland, 1996–2003. American Journal of Epidemiology, 167, 1155–
1163. doi:10.1093/aje/kwn017
Heikkinen, M. E., Henrikson, M. M., Isometsa, E. T., Marttunen, M. J.,
Aro, H. M., & Lonnqvist, J. K. (1997). Recent life events and suicide in
personality disorders. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 185,
373–381. doi:10.1097/00005053-199706000-00003
Hendin, H. (1991). Psychotherapy and suicide. American Journal of Psy-
chotherapy, 35, 469480.
Hendin, H., Al Jurdi, R. K., Houck, P. R., Hughes, S., & Turner, B. L.
(2010). Role of intense affects in predicting short-term risk for suicidal
behavior: A prospective study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease,
198, 220–225. doi:10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181d13d14
Hendin, H., Maltsberger, J. T., & Szanto, K. (2007). The role of intense
affective states in signaling a suicide crisis. Journal of Nervous and
Mental Disease, 195, 363–368.
Hunt, I. M., Kapur, N., Webb, R., Robinson, J., Burns, J., Shaw, J., &
Appleby, L. (2009). Suicide in recently discharged psychiatric patients:
A case-control study. Psychological Medicine, 39, 443–449. doi:
Isometsa, E., Henriksson, M., Marttunen, M., Heikkinen, M., Aro, H.,
Kuoppasalmi, K., & Lonnqvist, J. (1995). Mental disorders in young and
middle aged men who commit suicide. British Medical Journal, 310,
Jobes, D. A. (1995). The challenge and the promise of clinical suicidology.
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior 25, 437–449.
Jobes, D. A. (2011). Suicidal patients, the therapeutic alliance, and the
collaborative assessment and management of suicidality. In K. Michel,
D. A. Jobes, K. Michel, & D. A. Jobes (Eds.), Building a therapeutic
alliance with the suicidal patient (pp. 205–229). Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12303-012
Jobes, D. A., Kahn-Greene, E., Greene, J., & Goeke-Morey, M. (2009).
Clinical improvements of suicidal outpatients: Examining suicide status
form responses as moderators. Archives of Suicide Research, 13, 147–
Jobes, D. A., Luoma, J. B., Jacoby, A. M., & Mann, R. E. (1998). Manual
for the collaborative assessment and management of suicidality (CAMS).
Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America.
Jobes, D. A., Wong, S. A., Conrad, A., Drozd, J. F., & Neal-Walden, T.
(2005). The Collaborative assessment and management of suicidality vs.
treatment as usual: A retrospective study with suicidal outpatients.
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 35, 483–497. doi:10.1521/
Joiner, T. E. (2005). Why people die by suicide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Joiner, T. E., Conwell, Y., Fitzpatrick, K., Witte, T. K., Schmidt, N. B.,
Berlim, M. T., . . . Rudd, M. D. (2005). Four studies on how past and
current suicidality relate even when “everything but the kitchen sink” is
covaried. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 291–303. doi:10.1037/
Joiner, T. R., & Rudd, M. (2000). Intensity and duration of suicidal crisis
vary as a function of previous suicide attempts and negative life events.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 909–916. doi:
Josepho, S. A., Plutchik, R. (1994). Stress, coping, and suicide risk in
psychiatric inpatients. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 24, 48
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Koretz, D., Merikangas,
K. R., . . . Wang, P. S.; National Comorbidity Survey Replication.
(2003). The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: Results from the
National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Journal of the
American Medical Association, 289, 3095–3105. doi:10.1001/
Kposowa, A. J. (2000). Marital status and suicide in the National Longi-
tudinal Mortality Study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community
Health, 54, 254–261. doi:10.1136/jech.54.4.254
Kreitman, N. (1988). Suicide, age, and marital status. Psychological Med-
icine, 18, 121–128. doi:10.1017/S0033291700001951
Levy, K. N., Clarkin, J. F., Yeomans, F. E., Scott, L. N., Wasserman, R. H.,
& Kernberg, O. F. (2006). The mechanisms of change in the treatment
of borderline personality disorder with transference focused psychother-
apy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 481–501. doi:10.1002/
Linehan, M. M., Comtois, K. A., Murray, A. M., Brown, M. Z., Gallop,
R. J., Heard, H. L., . . . Reynolds, S. K. (2006). Two-year randomized
controlled trial and follow-up of dialectical behavior therapy vs therapy
by experts for suicidal behaviors and borderline personality disorder.
Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 757–766. doi:10.1001/archpsyc
Linehan, M. M., Goodstein, J. L., Nielsen, S. L., & Chiles, J. A. (1983).
Reasons for staying alive when you are thinking of killing yourself: The
reasons for living inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psy-
chology, 51, 276–286. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.51.2.276
Lizardi, D., Currier, D., Galfalvy, H., Sher, L., Burke, A., Mann, J., &
Oquendo, M. (2007). Perceived reasons for living at index hospitaliza-
tion and future suicide attempt. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease,
195, 451–455.
Maimon, D., Browning, C. R., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2010). Collective
efficacy, family attachment, and urban adolescent suicide attempts.
Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51, 307–324. doi:10.1177/
Malone, K. M., Oquendo, M. A., Haas, G. L., Ellis, S. P., Li, S., & Mann,
J. J. (2000). Protective factors against suicidal acts in major depression:
Reasons for living. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1084–1088.
Maltsberger, J. T., & Buie, D. H. (1980). The devices of suicide. Interna-
tional Review of Psychoanalysis, 7, 61–71.
Mann, J. J., Waternaux, C., Haas, G. L., & Malone, K. M. (1999). Toward
a clinical model of suicidal behavior in psychiatric patients. American
Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 181–189.
Maris, R. W. (1981). Pathways to suicide: A survey of self-destructive
behaviors. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Marzuk, P. M., Tardiff, K., Leon, A. C., Hirsch, C. S., Portera, L.,
Hartwell, N., & Iqbal, M. I. (1997). Lower risk of suicide during
pregnancy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 122–123.
Meltzer, H. Y., Alphs, L., Green, A. I., Altamura, A. C., Anand, R.,
Bertoldi, A., . . . Potkin, S.; International Suicide Prevention Trial Study
Group. (2003). Clozapine treatment for suicidality in schizophrenia:
International Suicide Prevention Trial (InterSePT). Archives of General
Psychiatry, 60, 82–91. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.1.82
Motto, J. A., & Bostrom, A. G. (2001). A randomized controlled trial of
postcrisis suicide prevention. Psychiatric Services, 52, 828833. doi:
Neeleman, J., Wessely, S., & Lewis, G. (1998). Suicide acceptability in
African- and white Americans: The role of religion. Journal of Nervous
and Mental Disease, 186, 12–16. doi:10.1097/00005053-199801000-
Nock, M. K., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). Prediction of suicide ideation and
attempts among adolescents using a brief performance-based test. Jour-
nal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 707–715. doi:10.1037/
Nock, M. K., Borges, G., Bromet, E. J, Alonso J, Angermeyer M, Beau-
trais, A, . . . Williams D. (2008). Cross-national prevalence and risk
factors for suicidal ideation, plans and attempts. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 192, 98–105. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.040113
Nock, M. K., Wedig, M., Janis, I., & Deliberto, T. (2008). Self-injurious
thoughts and behaviors. In J. Hunsley & E. J. Mash (Eds.): A guide to
assessments that work (pp. 158–177). New York: Oxford University
Oquendo, M. A., Halberstam, B., & Mann, J. J. (2003). Risk factors for
suicidal behavior: Utility and limitations of research instruments. In
M. B. First (Ed.), Standardized evaluation in clinical practice (Vol. 22,
pp. 103–130). Washington, DC: APPI Press.
Paykel, E. S., Prusoff, B. A., & Myers, J. K. (1975). Suicide attempts and
recent life events: A controlled comparison. Archives of General Psy-
chiatry, 32, 327–333.
Pescosolido, B. A., & Georgianna, S. (1989). Durkheim, suicide, and
religion: Toward a network theory of suicide. American Sociological
Review, 54, 33–48. doi:10.2307/2095660
Plakun, E. M. (1994). Principles in the psychotherapy of self-destructive
borderline patients. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice Research, 3,
Pokorny, A. D. (1983). Prediction of suicide in psychiatric patients. Ar-
chives of General Psychiatry, 40, 249–257.
Qin, P., & Mortensen, P. B. (2003). The impact of parental status on the
risk of completed suicide. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 797–802.
Qin, P., & Nordentoft, M. (2005). Suicide risk in relation to psychiatric
hospitalization. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 427–432. doi:
Rich, C. L., Young, D., & Fowler, R. C. (1986). San Diego suicide study,
I: Young vs old subjects. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43, 577–582.
Rossau, C. D., & Mortensen, P. B. (1997). Risk factors for suicide in
patients with schizophrenia: Nested case-control study. British Journal
of Psychiatry, 171, 355–359. doi:10.1192/bjp.171.4.355
Rudd, M. D. (2006). Fluid vulnerability theory: A cognitive approach to
understanding the process of acute and chronic suicide risk. Cognition
and suicide: Theory, research, and therapy. In T. E. Ellis (Ed.) Cognition
and suicide: Theory, research, and therapy, (pp. 355–368). Washington,
DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11377-016
Rudd, M. D., Berman, A. L., Joiner, T. E., Nock MK, Silverman MM,
Mandrusiak M, . . . Witte T. (2006). Warning signs for suicide: Theory,
research, and clinical applications. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behav-
ior, 36, 255–262. doi:10.1521/suli.2006.36.3.255
Smith, J. C., Mercy, J. A., & Conn, J. M. (1988). Marital status and the risk
of suicide. American Journal of Public Health, 78, 7880. doi:10.2105/
Soloff, P. H., & Fabio, A. (2008). Prospective predictors of suicide at-
tempts in borderline personality disorder at one, two, and two-to-five
year follow-up. Journal Personality Disorders, 22, 123–134. doi:
Truscott, D., Evans, J., & Knish, S. (1999). A process model for clinical
decision making in high-risk outpatient situations: The therapeutic alli-
ance and suicide. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 33, 307–316.
Turecki, G. (2005). Dissecting the suicide phenotype: The role of
impulsive–aggressive behaviours. Journal of Psychiatric Neuroscience,
30, 398408.
Winfree, L. R., & Jiang, S. (2010). Youthful suicide and social support:
Exploring the social dynamics of suicide-related behavior and attitudes
within a national sample of US adolescents. Youth Violence and Juvenile
Justice, 8, 19–37. doi:10.1177/1541204009338252
World Health Organization. (2005). World Health Organization: Suicide
Prevention. Retrieved October 26, 2005, from
Yen, S., Pagano, M., Shea, M. T., Grilo, C. M., Gunderson, J. G., Skodol,
A. E., . .. Zanarini, M. C. (2005). Recent life events preceding suicide
attempts in a personality disorder sample: Findings from the collabora-
tive longitudinal personality disorders study. Journal of Consulting and
Clinical Psychology, 73, 99–105. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.1.99
Yen, S., Shea, M. T., Pagano, M., Sanislow, C. A., Grilo, C. M.,
McGlashan, T. H., . . . Morey, L. C. (2003). Axis I and axis II disorders
as predictors of prospective suicide attempts: Findings from the collab-
orative longitudinal personality disorders study. Journal of Abnormal
Psychology, 112, 375–381. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.112.3.375
Yonkers, K. A., Ramin, S. M., Rush, A. J., Navarrete, C. A., Carmody, T.,
March, D., . .. Leveno, K. J. (2001). Onset and persistence of postpar-
tum depression in an inner-city maternal health clinic system. American
Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1856–1863. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp
Received September 9, 2011
Accepted September 16, 2011
... В то же самое время, существует целый ряд серьезных препятствий для того, чтобы оценить или спрогнозировать риск радикализации. Одно препятствие касается проблемы про- 11]. Попытка предсказать то, как будет действовать тот или иной индивид, скорее всего, базируется на постулатах теоретической модели или закономерности и требует особой аккуратности в применении, на что неоднократно указывалось в литературе [11; 14; 27]. ...
Full-text available
Problem. Terrorism is a long-standing phenomenon, it has existed for more than two millennia. It has been changing over time, acquiring the new features and characteristics of a particular era, but one feature has retained unchanged: terrorism still poses a serious threat to society. Purpose: the focus of our attention in this paper is to look into the potential of socio-psychological knowledge to assess the risk of radicalization in the adolescent and youth environment. This determines the purpose of the theoretical analysis presented here. Results: In the absence of risk assessment tools, M. Hogg’s theory of uncertainty-identity is an empirically proven theory adequate to explain the process of radicalisation (taking into account that a person is not radicalised alone, committing actions involving extreme violence is not an automatic continuation of extreme (or radical) ideas). The model explains why and how people join groups with extremist and radical beliefs, as well as why they pre-fer acts of violence, acting on behalf of these groups.
... This strategy was publicly accepted by Health Ministers in all 194 WHO member states to emphasize the importance of mental health, a significant achievement. There are 25 nations in the WHO member states where suicide is still illegal, and another 20 countries where suicide attempters may face jail time under Sharia law (8,9,10) . The Action Plan outlines specific efforts targeted at improving mental health and contributing to the achievement of a set of global goals, including (a) a 20% increase in service coverage for serious mental diseases and (b) a 10% reduction in suicide rates in nations by 2020. ...
Full-text available
Background: Suicide is linked to unmet needs, hopelessness and helplessness, an ambiguous conflict between survival and excruciating stress, a shrinking of seen options, and a wish for escape, the suicidal person's distress signal. Material and Method:A convenience sample was recruited from the aforementioned hospitals. Based on an effect size of 0.25, an alpha error probability of 0.05, a power of 0.80, number of groups = 2, and 3 measurements, the total sample size would be 72 who work in the previous mentioned setting were selected randomly for this study. The final sample size would be 72; 36 for the study group and 36 for the control group.A quasi-experimental design with study and control groups was used in this study, pretest-posttest research design was used in this study. The study was carried out in Al-Rashad Psychiatric Teaching Hospital and Ibn Rushd Psychiatric Teaching Hospital in Baghdad City. Data were analyzed using the statistical package for social science (SPSS) for windows, version 26.
... Experts in both realms accept that gray areas are unavoidable. The literature in these domains provides decision-making models highlighting what clinicians should consider when navigating gray areas (e.g., Fowler, 2012 Most current papers applying dimensional PD systems to case examples focus on relatively clean-cut cases (Bach et al., 2015;Bach & First, 2018;Waugh et al., 2017). Such papers are essential for the field, providing a foundation for clinicians to learn to employ new systems in a real-world context. ...
... Embora avanços tenham sido feitos no desenvolvimento de modelos de práticas para o rastreamento do comportamento suicida, 15 avaliação de risco, 16 intervenções clínicas específicas 17-19 e protocolos de acompanhamento para indivíduos suicidas, 20,21 a prevenção do suicídio só recentemente começou a ser incorporada, com base em algumas práticas baseadas em evidências na prática clínica nos serviços de saúde. 22 Em situações como o contexto da pandemia causada pela COVID-19, o enfoque das pesquisas, práticas dos serviços de saúde, ações dos gestores e divulgação de notícias na mídia costuma ser direcionado aos seus aspectos biológicos, dando-se pouca atenção ou subestimando-se os fatores psicossociais. ...
Full-text available
Introdução: O suicídio constitui-se em uma das principais causas de morte evitáveis. A pandemia da COVID-19 pode contribuir para reforçar os fatores de risco e a ideação suicida em razão da diminuição da capacidade de enfrentamento emocional ante a crise sanitária mundial. Ao mesmo tempo, os serviços de Atenção Primária à Saúde (APS) foram demandados a construir uma resposta rápida a questões relacionadas à saúde mental. Objetivo: Refletir sobre os fatores de risco e as possíveis intervenções para a prevenção do suicídio na atenção primária no contexto da pandemia da COVID-19. Métodos: Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa pautada na construção de uma análise crítica da literatura internacional sobre os fatores de risco e a prevenção do suicídio na APS durante a pandemia do novo coronavírus. Esta revisão foi construída por meio do levantamento de evidências na literatura internacional, feito pelo acesso às bases de dados científicas Web of Science, Science Direct e Scopus usando os descritores suicide AND prevention AND COVID-19 AND Primary Health Care. Foram incluídos artigos científicos disponibilizados entre dezembro de 2019 e setembro de 2020 e publicados em português, inglês e espanhol. Resultados: O corpus de análise foi composto de 15 artigos, com predominância da descrição de fatores de risco, da implementação e das adaptações de estratégias de intervenções específicas mediadas por recursos de tecnologia da informação e comunicação para oferecer cuidados de saúde mental. Conclusões: Os cuidados colaborativos pautados pelos atributos essenciais da APS destacaram-se como estratégias prioritárias para ofertar cuidados contínuos e longitudinais no contexto da pandemia.
Background Prediction of suicide and suicide attempts is an aspirational goal for clinicians and policy makers. This requires scrutiny of various diagnostic accuracy measurements. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of suicide risk scales in inpatient and emergency departments, and combined settings within hospitals, and consider the best scale in predicting suicide and suicide attempts in adults. Design Systematic review of diagnostic accuracy. Settings Inpatient and emergency rooms of acute hospitals. Methods The searched databases included PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycINFO and Scopus. Grey literature databases (ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Google Scholar and OpenSIGLE) and reference lists of all included studies were also searched. Eligibility criteria included prospective cohort studies of suicide or attempted suicide in adults. A narrative synthesis was done for true positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives, and they were calculated for sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, predictive values and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR). Results The included 33 studies differed in the methodological characteristics and scales used. The sensitivity of scales, specificity, positive predictive value, and DOR ranged from 17 to 100%, 11–93%, 0.43–40.9%, and 0.77–18.5, respectively. Conclusion The choice of scale for predicting suicide attempts in adults in hospitals depends on many factors. None of the scales evaluated produced accurate diagnostic measurements. The Manchester Self-Harm Rule and Suicide Crisis Syndrome should be used in the emergency department and inpatient setting, respectively, while the Suicide Intent Scale should be used in combined settings.
Objective The aim of this study is to examine service utilization disparities among Black youth participating in Linking Individuals Needing Care (LINC), a 90-day research-informed suicide care coordination intervention.Methods An open trial pilot was conducted to examine the effectiveness of LINC in increasing access to and engagement in mental health and non-mental health services among suicidal youth (N = 587). Other variables of interest included service use facilitators and service use barriers. Generalized linear mixed models with binomial distribution and logit link were performed to ascertain if service use facilitators and barriers were associated with service utilization and if disparities in service use and engagement existed between Black and White suicidal youth through a comparative analysis.ResultsService utilization differences were found between Black and White youth. While Black and White youth were both likely to engage in individual therapy (OR = 1.398, p < .001) and non-mental health services (OR = 1.289, p < .001), utilization rates for mental health and medication management services were lower for Black (55.1% to 60.6%) youth compared to White (66.0% to 71.0%) youth. Specifically, Black youth were significantly less likely than Whites to receive medication management (OR = .466, p = .002). Systemic barriers such long waitlists for care (OR = 1.860, p = .039) and poor relationship with providers (OR = 7.680, p = .028) increased odds of engagement in non-mental health services. Clinical disorders and engagement in suicide-related behaviors increased the likelihood of obtaining care from both medication management and non-mental health services.Conclusion Care coordination services for suicidal youth can increase access and engagement in mental health and non-mental health services. Culturally adapted models attending to cultural and social assets of Black families are needed to reduce disparities and suicide risk among Black youth.
Full-text available
Abstract Introduction: Suicide represents the second leading cause of death among adolescents. There are studies that link voice to suicidal risk. Methods: The research was conducted through a cross-sectional study, and the sample was selected through non-probability sampling, which included 40 adolescents between 16 and 19 years old from the city of Temuco. After the identification of suicidal attempts, the participants underwent voice and speech acoustic evaluation. Results: A parameter that showed differences was Jitter (p<0,05). As to the spontaneous speech tasks assessment, it was possible to observe differences in the formants concerning the vast majority of the vowels measured (p<0,05).Some voice and speech indicators differ depending on the group and the task requested. Conclusion: Therefore, these indicators might provide useful information for assessing suicidal behavior. Key words: Voice, suicidal attempt, suicide.
Full-text available
Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent and a major public health problem in Europe and worldwide. The present study pretends to characterize and evaluate the tendency of TB infections over a 6-year period. Methods: We performed a retrospective study on patients admitted to a tertiary hospital with tuberculosis, from 2011 to 2016, through electronic medical files’ data collection. Results: We included 591 patients with a peak in 2013, as well as a slight increase in male gender prevalence and length of stay over the 6 years. There was a spike of comorbidities in 2012. A decrease in prevalence in white patients, due to increase in African and Asian was also reported, besides a decline in HIV status, homelessness and IV drugs use. This coincided with an increase in laboratory changes and radiological changes, along with a rise in microbiological resistance. Discussion: Our data is in line with current health policy reports. It is of utmost importance the effort towards control and elimination of TB, through rapid diagnosis, prompt report and complete treatment.
Full-text available
Background Accurate assessment of suicide risk is critical for clinical practice, empirical advances, and informing public policy. In this narrative review of the literature, we compiled evidence from longitudinal studies that identify reporting bias of past self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITB) and examined possible correlates of inconsistent reporting. Method We conducted an extensive literature search, including 19 longitudinal samples or subsamples who reported the presence of current or past SITB at an initial but not at a subsequent assessment (yes/no inconsistent reports). Results The median was 33%, and the weighted mean was 39% (95% CI, 37%–41%) for the prevalence of inconsistent reporting of SITB across the longitudinal samples. Importantly, inconsistent reports were linked with less internalizing psychopathology and more adaptive functioning. The type of sample recruited and assessment interval may also be relevant factors to consider. Limitations Variability of sample characteristics and methodology made it challenging to draw firm conclusions across studies but provide information about critical sources of bias. Conclusions Results suggest considerable caution for clinical, empirical, and policy decision-making based on lifetime reports of suicide and encourage a continued consideration for identifying potential reporting biases for SITB.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Self-reported reasons for suicide attempts and nonsuicidal self-injury were examined using the Parasuicide History Interview within a sample of chronically suicidal women meeting criteria for borderline personality disorder (N = 75). Overall, reasons given for suicide attempts differed from reasons for nonsuicidal self-injury. Nonsuicidal acts were more often reported as intended to express anger. punish oneself. generate normal feelings. and distract oneself. whereas suicide attempts were more often reported as intended to make others better off. Almost all participants reported that both types of parasuicide were intended to relieve negative emotions. It is likely that suicidal and nonsuicidal parasuicide have multiple intents and functions.
Full-text available
Approximately 50% of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder attempt suicide, and approximately 10% die of suicide. Study results suggest that clozapine therapy significantly reduces suicidal behavior in these patients. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, international, 2-year study comparing the risk for suicidal behavior in patients treated with clozapine vs olanzapine was conducted in 980 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, 26.8% of whom were refractory to previous treatment, who were considered at high risk for suicide because of previous suicide attempts or current suicidal ideation. To equalize clinical contact across treatments, all patients were seen weekly for 6 months and then biweekly for 18 months. Subsequent to randomization, unmasked clinicians at each site could make any interventions necessary to prevent the occurrence of suicide attempts. Suicidal behavior was assessed at each visit. Primary end points included suicide attempts (including those that led to death), hospitalizations to prevent suicide, and a rating of "much worsening of suicidality" from baseline. Masked raters, including an independent suicide monitoring board, determined when end point criteria were achieved. RESULTS: Suicidal behavior was significantly less in patients treated with clozapine vs olanzapine (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.97; P =.03). Fewer clozapine-treated patients attempted suicide (34 vs 55; P =.03), required hospitalizations (82 vs 107; P =.05) or rescue interventions (118 vs 155; P =.01) to prevent suicide, or required concomitant treatment with antidepressants (221 vs 258; P =.01) or anxiolytics or soporifics (301 vs 331; P =.03). Overall, few of these high-risk patients died of suicide during the study (5 clozapine vs 3 olanzapine-treated patients; P =.73). CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine therapy demonstrated superiority to olanzapine therapy in preventing suicide attempts in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder at high risk for suicide. Use of clozapine in this population should lead to a significant reduction in suicidal behavior.
Full-text available
When a client is at risk for suicide, important counselling decisions must be made. In this article we present a process model for decision making in high-risk outpatient situations. We propose that counsellors attend to two key dimensions of these situations: the strength of the therapeutic alliance and the degree of suicide risk. Therapeutic actions are then directed toward strengthening the alliance, and toward implementing other risk-reduction interven-tions only when the risk cannot be adequately reduced via the alliance. Four case studies are presented to illustrate the application of the model to suicidal situations.
Full-text available
Since the late-nineteenth century, scholars have investigated how structural elements within a community—what is now called social support—relate to suicide. However, social support has rarely been used to study adolescent suicide, particularly within a nationally representative sample. The current study, using the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health (Add Health), explores the ties between social support mechanisms and adolescent expressions of suicide ideation and suicide attempts. Using the 2-level hierarchical generalized linear modeling (HGLM) technique, the current study found that such phenomena can be understood in terms of social support and certain individual factors, some common to both ideation and attempts, others unique to one or the other. Moreover, suicide ideation and attempts were linked to the risk-taking behaviors of the youths, their friends, and their family members. Feeling safe at school was one of the most consistent protective factors included in the study.
Background Approximately 50% of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder attempt suicide, and approximately 10% die of suicide. Study results suggest that clozapine therapy significantly reduces suicidal behavior in these patients.Methods A multicenter, randomized, international, 2-year study comparing the risk for suicidal behavior in patients treated with clozapine vs olanzapine was conducted in 980 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, 26.8% of whom were refractory to previous treatment, who were considered at high risk for suicide because of previous suicide attempts or current suicidal ideation. To equalize clinical contact across treatments, all patients were seen weekly for 6 months and then biweekly for 18 months. Subsequent to randomization, unmasked clinicians at each site could make any interventions necessary to prevent the occurrence of suicide attempts. Suicidal behavior was assessed at each visit. Primary end points included suicide attempts (including those that led to death), hospitalizations to prevent suicide, and a rating of "much worsening of suicidality" from baseline. Masked raters, including an independent suicide monitoring board, determined when end point criteria were achieved.Results Suicidal behavior was significantly less in patients treated with clozapine vs olanzapine (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.97; P = .03). Fewer clozapine-treated patients attempted suicide (34 vs 55; P = .03), required hospitalizations (82 vs 107; P =.05) or rescue interventions (118 vs 155; P = .01) to prevent suicide, or required concomitant treatment with antidepressants (221 vs 258; P = .01) or anxiolytics or soporifics (301 vs 331; P =.03). Overall, few of these high-risk patients died of suicide during the study (5 clozapine vs 3 olanzapine-treated patients; P = .73).Conclusions Clozapine therapy demonstrated superiority to olanzapine therapy in preventing suicide attempts in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder at high risk for suicide. Use of clozapine in this population should lead to a significant reduction in suicidal behavior.