Skin Sterility After Application of Ethyl Chloride Spray

New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey 07101, USA.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Impact Factor: 5.28). 01/2012; 94(2):118-20. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00229
Source: PubMed


Ethyl chloride topical anesthetic spray is labeled as nonsterile, yet it is widely used during injection procedures performed in an outpatient setting. The purpose of this study was to investigate the sterility of ethyl chloride topical anesthetic spray applied before an injection. Our a priori hypothesis was that application of the spray after the skin has been prepared would not alter the sterility of the injection site.
We conducted a prospective, blinded, controlled study to assess the effect of ethyl chloride spray on skin sterility. Fifteen healthy adult subjects (age, twenty-three to sixty-one years) were prepared for mock injections into both shoulders and both knees, although no injection was actually performed. Three culture samples were obtained from each site on the skin: one before skin preparation with isopropyl alcohol, one after skin preparation and before application of ethyl chloride, and one after ethyl chloride had been sprayed on the site. In addition, the sterility of the ethyl chloride was tested directly by inoculating cultures with spray from the bottles.
Growth occurred in 70% of the samples obtained before skin preparation, 3% of the samples obtained after skin preparation but before application of ethyl chloride, and 5% of the samples obtained after the injection site had been sprayed with ethyl chloride. The percentage of positive cultures did not increase significantly after application of ethyl chloride (p = 0.65). Spraying of ethyl chloride directly on agar plates resulted in growth on 13% of these plates compared with 11% of the control plates; this difference was also not significant (p = 0.80).
Although ethyl chloride spray is not sterile, its application did not alter the sterility of the injection sites in the shoulder and knee.

15 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Injections of the knee joint and the surrounding structures are one of the most common interventions performed by providers of musculoskeletal care. With appropriate patient selection, injections may provide substantial short-term relief with infrequent complications. Longer-term outcomes, including modification of the underlying disease processes, are debated within the literature. In this review, we provide an overview of injection therapy in and around the knee, with a focus on the indications, complications, pertinent techniques (including preparation, approaches, and aftercare), types of injectables (corticosteroids, viscosupplementation, and platelet-rich plasma), and evidence-based recommendations for roles of injection therapy in both intra- and extra-articular disease processes.
    No preview · Article · Jun 2012 · Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Closed reduction and K-wire fixation is standard treatment for displaced supracondylar fractures in children. The purpose of this study is to evaluate pain using 2 pediatric pain scales when removing K-wires from the distal humerus in children in the office setting. Methods: A total of 98 percutaneous smooth K-wires were removed from 47 patients who had sustained displaced supracondylar fractures of the elbow. Pain was measured using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS). The maximum score is 13 and the minimum score is 4 points. In addition, after K-wire removal, each child indicated on a numbered pain-face diagram (Wong-Baker FACES: a scale consisting of faces with varying emotional expressions and corresponding numbers on a scale from 0 to 5) the amount of pain that they felt. Results: The average age of the patients treated was 7.1 years (range, 2 to 14 y). There were 28 males and 19 females. Thirty patients (64%) had a CHEOPS score of <=6. The average CHEOPS was 6 (range, 4 to 10). Seventeen patients (37%) had a FACES score of <=1. The average FACES score was 2 (range, 1 to 5). Higher CHEOPS and FACES scores correlated with younger patient age and higher number of K-wires removed. Conclusions: K-wire removal in the clinic is common practice. The pain associated with K-wire removal and the safety of this practice has received minimal previous study in the literature. In the present manuscript, 64% of patients had little or no pain measured by the CHEOPS scale-score of <=6 and 36% had little or no pain self-reported by the FACES scale-score of <=1. No patient reported severe pain by the CHEOPS scores (CHEOPS 11 to 13) and only 1 patient reported having severe pain with a FACES of 5. No complications occurred. The results of this study suggest that the removal of K-wires in the office setting is safe and acceptable. Level of Evidence: Retrospective analysis.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2014 · Journal of pediatric orthopedics
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND Refrigerant sprays have been widely used to reduce pain in the office setting. However, more recently, their use has been limited by both concern regarding flammability and questions of bacterial contamination. OBJECTIVE We investigated the microbiological effect of 1,1,1,3,3 pentafluoropropane and 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane when sprayed after povidone-iodine application in 50 volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS In 50 volunteers, 3 cultures were taken (1) at time 0 before antiseptic application, (2) after povidone-iodine topical antiseptic, and (3) after spraying with vapocoolant. Cultures at 3 time intervals were analyzed in a blinded fashion, and Gram stains obtained when cultures were positive. RESULTS Bacterial growth was found in 98% of cultures taken before antiseptic was applied (Group 1), in 28 cultures (56%) after povidone-iodine was applied, and in 24 cultures (48%) after spraying with vapocoolant. There was a statistically significant difference found between Group 1 (no antiseptic) and both Group 2 (after antiseptic but before vapocoolant) and Group 3 (after vapocoolant) (p < .001). CONCLUSION The topical antiseptic povidone-iodine significantly reduces skin colonization when compared with unprepared skin (p < .001). The vapocoolant 1,1,1,3,3 pentafluoropropane and 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane is sprayed on skin prepared with povidone-iodine; there is no statistically significant increase in bacterial colonization.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2014 · Dermatologic Surgery
Show more