Conference PaperPDF Available

Gamification: Using game design elements in non-gaming contexts

Authors:
Sebastian Deterding at University of York
Sebastian Deterding
Miguel Sicart
Miguel Sicart
Miguel Sicart
  • This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.
Lennart Nacke at University of Waterloo
Lennart Nacke
Kenton O’Hara at University of Bristol
Kenton O’Hara
Show all 5 authorsHide
Download full-text PDF
Read full-text
Download citation

Abstract

"Gamification" is an informal umbrella term for the use of video game elements in non-gaming systems to improve user experience (UX) and user engagement. The recent introduction of 'gamified' applications to large audiences promises new additions to the existing rich and diverse research on the heuristics, design patterns and dynamics of games and the positive UX they provide. However, what is lacking for a next step forward is the integration of this precise diversity of research endeavors. Therefore, this workshop brings together practitioners and researchers to develop a shared understanding of existing approaches and findings around the gamification of information systems, and identify key synergies, opportunities, and questions for future research.
Content uploaded by Dan Dixon
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Dan Dixon
Content may be subject to copyright.
Gamification: Using Game Design
Elements in Non-Gaming Contexts
Abstract
“Gamification” is an informal umbrella term for the use
of video game elements in non-gaming systems to
improve user experience (UX) and user engagement.
The recent introduction of ‘gamified’ applications to
large audiences promises new additions to the existing
rich and diverse research on the heuristics, design
patterns and dynamics of games and the positive UX
they provide. However, what is lacking for a next step
forward is the integration of this precise diversity of
research endeavors. Therefore, this workshop brings
together practitioners and researchers to develop a
shared understanding of existing approaches and
findings around the gamification of information
systems, and identify key synergies, opportunities, and
questions for future research.
Keywords
Gamification, game design, design patterns,
motivational affordances, funology, persuasive
technology, games with a purpose
ACM Classification Keywords
H.5.m [Information Interfaces and Presentation (e.g.,
HCI)]: Miscellaneous; K.8.0 [Personal Computing]:
Games; J.4 [Social and Behavioral Sciences]:
Psychology, Sociology
Copyright is held by the author/owner(s).
CHI 2011, May 7–12, 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
ACM 978-1-4503-0268-5/11/05.
Sebastian Deterding
Hans-Bredow Institute at the
University of Hamburg,
20354 Hamburg, Germany
s.deterding@hans-bredow-
institut.de
Miguel Sicart
Center for Computer Games
Research,
IT University of Copenhagen
DK-2300 Copenhagen S
Miguel@itu.dk
Lennart Nacke
Department of Computer Science,
University of Saskatchewan
Saskatoon, Canada, S7N 5C9
lennart.nacke@acm.org
Kenton O’Hara
Microsoft Research Cambridge,
7 JJ Thomson Ave
Cambridge CB3 0FB, UK
kenton@gwork.org
Dan Dixon
Digital Cultures Research Centre,
University of the West of England,
Bristol BS16 1QY, UK
dan.dixon@uwe.ac.uk
General Terms
Design, Theory
Introduction
Games and game technologies increasingly transcend
the traditional boundaries of their medium, as
evidenced by the growth of serious and pervasive
games as an industry and research field. The most
recent phenomenon in this trajectory is ‘gamification’,
an umbrella term for the use of video game elements
(rather than full-fledged games) to improve user
experience and user engagement in non-game services
and applications.
Following the success of location-based service
Foursquare, this design approach has rapidly gained
traction in interaction design and digital marketing
[22], spawning an intense debate within the
professional community1 as well as numerous ‘gamified’
applications, ranging from productivity to finance,
health, sustainability, news, user-generated content
and tutorials. Several vendors now offer gamification as
a service layer of reward and reputation systems with
points, badges, levels and leader boards.2 At the same
time, gamification has caught the interest of
researchers as a potential means to create engaging
workplaces [16] or facilitate mass-collaboration [11].
Background
To wit, the use of game design and game elements in
other contexts is an old topic in human-computer
interaction (HCI): Attempts to derive heuristics for
1 See e.g. the 2011 Gamification Summit and the gamification
day at the 2011 GDC Serious Games Summit.
2 See e.g. Badgeville, Bunchball, Bigdoor Media, GetGlue.
enjoyable interfaces from games reach back to the
early 1980s [9, 10]. More recently, researchers have
tried to identify design patterns that might afford joy of
use under the moniker “funology”, explicitly drawing
inspiration from game design [3].
A growing body of research looks into “games with a
purpose” piggybacking game play to solve human
information tasks such as tagging images. This included
work detailing specific design features that afford
player enjoyment [20]. Furthermore, researchers in
HCI and management sciences have identified design
principles that enhance the motivational affordances of
computer-supported collaborative work [5, 21] –
principles which are congruent with research on the
motivational psychology of video games [17].
In persuasive technology [4], video games and game
aspects have been studied as potential means to shape
user behavior in directions intended by the system
designer [8, 14], or to instill embedded values [1].
Social psychological studies on contributions in online
communities or the motivational uses of recommender
systems arrived at conclusions that chime with core
design properties of video games [7, 15]. Likewise, it
suggests itself to model the reward and reputation
systems of gamified applications with economically
inspired approaches such as incentive centered design.
The user experience of video games has itself become a
substantial topic of HCI, with researchers developing
models and methods as well as heuristics for the
usability or playability of games [2, 18, 19]. An obvious
matter of interest is to which degree these can be
transferred to the design of gamified information
systems. Finally, a growing body of research points to
the significant role of social contexts in the constitution
of video game play experience [6], which immediately
raises the question whether and how the transfer of
(game) design patterns into ‘alien’ social contexts
might significantly alter their experiential affordances.
Workshop Goals
Faced with the broad adoption of ‘gamified’ applications
beyond HCI laboratories on the one hand and a rich if
disconnected body of existing research on the other,
the goal of this workshop is to bring together HCI
researchers from academia and industry to (a) take
stock and synthesize a shared picture of pertinent
existing and current research surrounding gamification,
and (b) identify potential new aspects and research
opportunities opened by new gamified applications. To
this end, we invite researchers to submit position
papers on (ongoing) empirical work or accounts of
existing approaches and findings that might elucidate
the user experience, psychology, social dynamics and
design of information systems employing game
elements. The primary intended outcome of the
workshop is to build a shared overview of the state-of-
the-art (published as a report) by clarifying the
questions below, and to seed a researcher community
that shall be built out via the workshop site and follow-
up events that connect other pertinent research
communities (e.g. game studies) towards substantial
research and publication efforts.
Workshop Questions
• What is the current state of research surrounding
gamification? How might we integrate it?
• Which existing approaches are well-suited to study
and model gamified information systems?
• Do gamified applications feature specific or novel
characteristics not covered by previous research?
• What happens when game design elements are
transferred into non-game social contexts?
• Which promising (new) research topics and data
sources do gamified applications provide?
Participants and Expected Interest
We consider the collaborative study of the recent surge
of ‘gamified’ information systems to be of immediate
relevance to HCI researchers in all fields mentioned
above (funology, persuasive technology, communities,
motivational affordances, game UX, etc.): On the one
hand, the implementation of game design elements on
a mass market scale potentially surfaces phenomena
that wouldn’t appear in laboratory prototypes. Gamified
systems ‘in the wild’ provide new objects of inquiry in
an unprecedented variety, data quality and scale. On
the other hand, the focused integration of the many
close but by-and-large decoupled research endeavors
would greatly benefit each in turn. Although workshops
in past conferences have already addressed single
issues [12, 13], none of them has taken such an
integrative approach. Therefore, at this point in time,
such a synthesizing workshop on gamification would be
of high interest to HCI researchers as well as
researchers working on the increased blurring of
(digital) life, work, and play in general.
References
[1] Barr, P., Noble, J., and Biddle, R. Video game
values: Human-computer interaction and games.
Interacting with Computers 19, 2 (2007), 180-195.
[2] Bernhaupt, R. User Experience Evaluation in
Entertainment. In R. Bernhaupt, Evaluating User
Experience in Games: Concepts and Methods. Springer,
London, 2010, 3-7.
[3] Blythe, M.A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A.F., and
Wright, P.C. Funology: from usability to enjoyment.
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 2004.
[4] Fogg, B.J. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers
to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann,
Amsterdam et al, 2002.
[5] Jung, J.H., Schneider, C., and Valacich, J.
Enhancing the Motivational Affordance of Information
Systems: The Effects of Real-Time Performance
Feedback and Goal Setting in Group Collaboration
Environments. Management Science 56, 4 (2010), 724-
742.
[6] Kort, Y.A. and Ijsselsteijn, W.A. People, Places, and
Play: Player Experience in a Socio-Spatial Context.
Computers in Entertainment 6, 2 (2008), art. 18.
[7] Ling, K., Beenen, G., Ludford, P., et al. Using Social
Psychology to Motivate Contributions to Online
Communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication 10, 4 (2005), art. 10.
[8] Lockton, D., Harrison, D., and Stanton, N.A. The
Design with Intent Method: A design tool for influencing
user behaviour. Applied Ergonomics 41, 3 (2010), 382-
392.
[9] Malone, T. What makes things fun to learn?
Heuristics for designing instructional computer games.
Proc. 3rd ACM SIGSMALL symposium, ACM Press
(1980), 162-169.
[10] Malone, T. Heuristics for designing enjoyable user
interfaces: Lessons from computer games. Proc. 1982
conference on Human factors in computing systems,
ACM Press (1982), 63-68.
[11] McGonigal, J. Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make
Us Better and How They Can Change the World.
Penguin, London, 2011.
[12] Monk, A., Hassenzahl, M., Blythe, M., and Reed, D.
Funology: designing enjoyment. Proc. CHI 2002
extended abstracts, ACM Press (2002), 924-925.
[13] Nacke, L., Niesenhaus, J., Engl, S., Canossa, A.,
Kuikkaniemi, K., and Immich, T. Bringing Game Design
and Affective Evaluation to User Research and User
Experience. Entertainment Interfaces Workshop,
Duisburg, Germany. 2010.
[14] Niebuhr, S. and Kerkow, D. Captivating patterns: a
first validation. Proc. PERSUASIVE 2007, Springer
(2007), 48-54.
[15] Rashid, A.M., Ling, K., Tassone, R.D., Resnick, P.,
Kraut, R., and Riedl, J. Motivating participation by
displaying the value of contribution. Proc. CHI 2006,
ACM Press (2006).
[16] Reeves, B. and Read, J.L. Total Engagement: Using
Games and Virtual Worlds to Change the Way People
Work and Businesses Compete. Harvard Business
School Press, Boston, MA, 2009.
[17] Ryan, R.M., Rigby, C.S., and Przybylski, A. The
Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination
Theory Approach. Motivation and Emotion 30, 4 (2006),
344-360.
[18] Shaffer, N. Heuristic Evaluation of Games. In K.
Isbister and N. Shaffer, Game Usability. Morgan
Kaufman, Amsterdam et al., 2008, 79-89.
[19] Sweetser, P. and Wyeth, P. GameFlow: A Model for
Evaluating Player Enjoyment in Games. Computers in
Entertainment 3, 3 (2005), art. 3A.
[20] von Ahn, L. and Dabbish, L. Designing games with
a purpose. Communications of the ACM 51, 8 (2008),
58-67.
[21] Zhang, P. Motivational Affordances: Reasons for
ICT Design and Use. Communications of the ACM 51,
11 (2008), 145-147.
[22] Zichermann, G. and Linder, J. Game-Based
Marketing: Inspire Customer Loyalty Through Rewards,
Challenges, and Contests. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2010.
... Capacity building is defined as "Activities that strengthen the knowledge, abilities, skills, and behaviour of individuals and improve institutional structure and processes so that the organization can efficiently meet its goals in a sustainable way." (Ku and Yuen-Tsang 2013, p. 1). From a capacity building perspective, it is therefore possible to assume that games can be used as the foundation for creating digital innovation, since gameplay is a concrete activity with a specific aim and outcome (Deterding et al. 2011;Madsen and Rasmussen 2021). The academic studies on capacity building with reference to innovation, exploration and exploitation and organizational learning are only starting to sprout, but their ability to better nuance, explain and tackle complex, real-world phenomena is starting to get noticed (Brix 2019(Brix , 2020Beger, Sağlam, and Turker 2023). ...
... When we write about games and gamification in this paper, we refer to Deterding et al. (2011) and Shpakova, Dörfler, and MacBryde (2020) definition, which broadly defines gamification as the use of game design elements in non-game contexts to enhance user experience and engagement. Deterding et al. (2011) describe gamification as "the use of game design elements in non-game contexts" and emphasize the importance of leveraging these elements to create game-like sensations of fun and engagement, even in typically mundane or boring contexts. ...
... When we write about games and gamification in this paper, we refer to Deterding et al. (2011) and Shpakova, Dörfler, and MacBryde (2020) definition, which broadly defines gamification as the use of game design elements in non-game contexts to enhance user experience and engagement. Deterding et al. (2011) describe gamification as "the use of game design elements in non-game contexts" and emphasize the importance of leveraging these elements to create game-like sensations of fun and engagement, even in typically mundane or boring contexts. Game elements vary in levels of abstraction and are often categorized using frameworks like the MDA (mechanics, dynamics and aesthetics) framework developed for game design. ...
Building Capacity for Digital Innovation - A Game-Study
Article
  • Dec 2024
  • Creativ Innovat Manag
Organizations are facing a constant stream of emerging technologies that require management and staff to be more flexible, open and critical in exploring new potential. In supporting new digital innovation, an organization will inevitably be affected on the level of strategy, business design and operation. In this paper, we explore games' potential as one approach for building digital innovation capacity in an organization since games have been proven beneficial in early innovation and learning processes. Theoretically, we focus on 'building digital innovation capacity.' This is understood as a process where the knowledge about digi-talization and digital transformation is used to strengthen individuals' skills, abilities and opportunities-knowledge that can be used as a source for organizational learning and development. In this paper, we explore and discuss the role of games in building capacity for digital innovation in established organizations through an empirical study consisting of four game sessions with the game Cards for IoT. Overall, this game study implies three important themes concerning games' role in building capacity for digital innovation in established organizations: gameplay & facilitation, player mindset and contextualization. The perspectives, nuances and insights of the themes are discussed with the literature on capacity building.
View
... A pandemia aumentou o uso de tecnologias digitais na educação, exigindo mais profissionais em informática educacional [Valente et al. 2022] e incentivando pesquisas para reduzir retenções em cursos superiores, especialmente em computação [dos Santos Silva et al. 2020, Robins 2019. Jogos [Honda et al. 2022] e gamificação, que aplicam mecânicas de jogos em contextos educativos [Deterding et al. 2011], surgem como ferramentas eficazes, apoiadas pelos efeitos motivadores dos jogos na aprendizagem [Honda et al. 2022, Pessoa et al. 2019]. ...
... A gamificação utiliza técnicas e mecânicas de jogos para envolver pessoas e solucionar problemas, proporcionando maior engajamento, motivação e participação em tarefas consideradas triviais ou pouco interessantes [Werbach et al. 2012, Deterding et al. 2011, Pessoa et al. 2019, Bernardo et al. 2021]. Incorporando elementos de jogos, a gamificação transforma atividades cotidianas em experiências empolgantes e gratificantes, sendo investigada em aplicações educacionais [Pires et al. 2019, Subhash e Cudney 2018. ...
GDS System: Uma proposta de construção da gamificação educacional através de narrativa
Conference Paper
  • Sep 2024
Este trabalho apresenta uma proposta de ferramenta digital chamada GDS System, que tem o objetivo de auxiliar no processo de criação de artefatos voltados para gamificações educacionais. A proposta se baseia em um processo de gamificação educacional chamado Game Design Storytelling (GDS), sendo este estruturado para desenvolver artefatos educacionais gamificados com base em elementos de jogos, narrativas e aprendizagem. Para avaliar o sistema, foram executados dois testes utilizando a Escala de Usabilidade de Sistema (System Usability Scale - SUS). O primeiro teste com o protótipo de média fidelidade identificou melhorias, como integrar uma API do ChatGPT para otimizar a criação de projetos gamificados. Após essas melhorias, o segundo teste, com os mesmos participantes, indicou que os usuários acharam a ferramenta fácil de usar e intuitiva.
View
... TSTM was created for educational objectives rather than for amusement. Additionally, it introduces chess and teaches individuals unfamiliar with the game's fundamentals through gamification [81,82]. Of the experts who participated in the study, 91% said they would utilize a serious video game like TSTM as an educational and rehabilitation tool. ...
Managing ADHD Symptoms in Children Through the Use of Various Technology-Driven Serious Games: A Systematic Review
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2025
Children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) frequently experience impairments in a range of abilities. Due to their poor attention and concentration, they find it challenging to stay focused when learning. They need help to retain the directions given by teachers and are very animated. Focus issues, hyperactivity, and attention problems may hamper learning. The needs and challenges of children with ADHD have been addressed by numerous digital solutions over the years. These solutions support a variety of needs (e.g., diagnosing versus treating), aim to address a variety of goals (e.g., addressing inattention, impulsivity, working memory, executive functions, emotion regulation), and employ a wide range of technologies, including video games, PC, mobile, web, AR, VR, tangible interfaces, wearables, robots, and BCI/neurofeedback, occasionally even in tandem. According to studies on the psychological impacts of serious games, immersive games can potentially be valuable tools for treating ADHD. This research investigates using PC, mobile/tablet applications, augmented reality, virtual reality, and brain-computer interfaces to develop executive functions and metacognitive and emotional competencies in children with ADHD through serious games. Following PRISMA 2020 criteria, this systematic review includes a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. The database search provided 784 records, and 30 studies met the inclusion criteria. The results showed that serious games assisted by multiple technologies could significantly improve a wide range of cognitive and socioemotional meta-competencies among children with ADHD, including visuospatial working memory, attention, inhibition control, cognitive flexibility, planning/organizing, problem-solving, social communication, and emotional regulation. The results of this review may provide positive feedback for creating more inclusive digital training environments for the treatment of ADHD children.
View
... It can lead to motivation and even stronger involvement with the content because the educational experience is displayed in an interactive form and at the same time understandable more engaging. In a similar fashion, gamified learning environment increases the levels of achievement and competence as the students achieve greater emotional satisfaction and motivation (Deterding et al., 2011). ...
View
... Low learning outcomes can be caused by several factors that influence the learning process, one of which is the lack of innovation in the selection of learning media (Sukma, & Handayani, 2022). Implementing games into lessons can increase user engagement, but their implementation must be in a non-game context (Deterding et al., 2011). The application of the gamification concept can also have a positive impact on student achievement and behavior (Yildirim, 2017). ...
The use of Word Wall Learning Media in Science Learning to Improve The Learning Outcomes of Class 5c Students of Elementary School Kutowinangun 01 Salatiga
Article
Full-text available
  • Dec 2024
Word walls are visual games that help students remember material easily, retain knowledge, and make learning fun. This research aims to improve student learning outcomes by implementing word walls in learning in class V. This research uses Classroom Action Research. The research informants consisted of 20 students of class V SD Kutowinangun 01 Salatiga, with details of 10 boys and 10 girls. Data collection techniques through observation and tests. The results of this research show an average score of 57.5% in the pre-cycle, far below the school's minimum standard of 75%. In the first cycle, student learning outcomes using the Word Wall approach showed improvement, but had not yet reached the minimum standard. The average student score increased from 61 in the 1st cycle 1 meeting test to 66.5 in the 2nd cycle 1st meeting learning outcomes. The number of students who got a score that reached the minimum standard was 60%, but the first cycle was considered not yet completed because the passing percentage had not yet reached 75%. In the second cycle, similar actions were carried out, and cycle 2 got better results. The average student score increased to 71 in the learning results of the 1st cycle 2 meeting test, but they still did not achieve success because only 60% of students passed. Finally, at the second meeting of the second cycle, the students' average score increased to 77%, meaning that the learning action using the word wall was successful and exceeded the minimum standard.
View
... Gamification, defined as the use of game elements outside a game context [Deterding et al. 2011, Marczewski 2015, has been widely explored in various contexts such as health [Lewis et al. 2016], software development [Pedreira et al. 2015] and education [Bai et al. 2020]. Gamification is used to improve users' motivation and engagement, once the insertion of playful elements directly affects these users. ...
Task Complete: A gamified solution to exercise positive habits in players with Intellectual Disabilities
Conference Paper
  • Sep 2024
This paper describes creating and evaluating a gamified solution called Task Complete, which aims to support productivity and encourage positive habits in its players, especially people with Intellectual Disabilities. The solution transforms everyday tasks into motivational elements, engaging users through virtual rewards. It was designed following principles of User Centered Design, as well as developed and evaluated considering accessibility and usability requirements. The PENS model and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)1 were considered in the project, seeking to make the solution inclusive for various user profiles.
View
View
Emerging Paradigms in Non-Profit Governance: A Comprehensive Analysis of Disruptive Innovations
Chapter
  • Jan 2025
This chapter explores the transformative potential of disruptive innovations in non-profit governance. As technology and societal changes advance, non-profits must adapt to remain relevant and efficient. The discourse examines blockchain technology, artificial intelligence (AI), decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), gamification, and advanced financial models. Blockchain enhances financial transparency with an immutable ledger, boosting donor confidence. AI offers superior data analytics to understand donor behavior, optimize resources, and predict fundraising trends. DAOs use blockchain-based smart contracts for participative governance, empowering stakeholders. Gamification engages stakeholders by incorporating game elements, appealing to a tech-savvy audience. Advanced financial models like impact investing and social finance attract capital seeking both financial returns and social impact. Integrating these trends can improve transparency, stakeholder engagement, and financial robustness, ensuring sustainability and promoting societal progress.
View
Co-development of a gamified physical education movement competence intervention with school stakeholders
Article
  • Jan 2025
Movement competence (MC) and emotional intelligence (EI) are positively associated and important for child development. Intervention research is needed to determine causal relationships between these outcomes. Gamification is a pedagogical model that may enhance MC and EI, but implementing interventions in schools is complex and requires multi-stakeholder involvement to ensure feasibility, acceptability and sustainability. However, methodological evidence to inform co-development work within physical education (PE) is lacking and further research is required. This study describes the process of co-developing a gamified PE intervention with school stakeholders to increase MC and EI among primary-aged children. A total of 91 children and four classroom teachers from three primary schools participated in a series of co-development workshops. Data from the workshops were thematically analysed and informed the development of three school-specific gamified PE curriculums. Findings from children included: (1) the social and foundational movement skills (FMS) to improve during the intervention; (2) the enjoyable components of PE, which included skill development and social interaction; (3) a desire to include more equipment in PE lessons; and (4) games, activities and gamification strategies to incorporate in the intervention. Findings from teachers included: (1) the barriers and facilitators to implementing a gamified model in PE; (2) the successful components of PE lessons; and (3) the overall development of the intervention. This methodology provides a framework for co-developing PE interventions within a school context. Results provide strategies to operationalise gamification. Future research should explore the feasibility and acceptability of the co-developed interventions to increase MC and EI.
View
Enhancing Education in Bahrain With AI and ML: Through Wearable Technology
Chapter
  • Jan 2025
The study explores the transformative potential of integrating AI and ML in wearable technologies to enhance Bahrain's education sector. It emphasizes the personalized learning experiences and holistic student support such technologies can offer, promoting academic and emotional well-being. Additionally, AI-powered wearables can aid teachers in classroom management and professional development. By preparing students for digital-centric work environments, Bahrain aims to align with global workforce trends and Sustainable Development Goals. The chapter discusses integration challenges, benefits, and ethical considerations, advocating for a supportive ecosystem. It reviews Bahrain's educational projects, regulatory frameworks, and policies driving AI and ML adoption in education. Leveraging secondary data, the study underscores the significance of AI and ML in wearables for educational advancement in Bahrain.
View
Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2004
Under-contribution is a problem for many online communities. Social psychology theories of social loafing and goal-setting can provide mid-level design principles to address this problem. We tested the design principles in two field experiments. In one, members of an online movie recommender community were reminded of the uniqueness of their contributions and the benefits that follow from them. In the second, they were given a range of individual or group goals for contribution. As predicted by theory, individuals contributed when they were reminded of their uniqueness and when they were given specific and challenging goals, but other predictions were not borne out. The paper ends with suggestions and challenges for mining social science theories as well as implications for design.
View
Motivational Affordances: Fundamental Reasons for ICT Design and Use
Article
Full-text available
  • Oct 2008
Various logical, social, cognitive, and emotional sources of motivational affordance principles for information and communication technology (ICT) design and use, are presented. Autonomy-supportive social contexts tend to facilitate self-determined motivation, healthy development, and optimal functioning, while motivational analysis of self has aspects such as defining or creating the self and relating the self to society. Competence provides an inherent source of motivation for seeking out and putting effort to master optimal challenges that are developmentally appropriate. Relatedness is a psychological need indicating the innate desire to belong while interaction with others is the primary condition that involves relatedness. Leadership is a condition that involves and satisfies the need for power, while emotion relates to motivation that energize and direct behavior.
View
View
View
View
View
Total Engagement: Using Games and Virtual Worlds to Change the Way People Work and Businesses Compete
Book
  • Jan 2009
Can the workplace be redesigned to include avatars, three-dimensional environments, and a host of virtual rewards that form newly transparent reputations for you and your team? This grounded and thought-provoking book by Byron Reeves and Leighton Read argues that it is not only possible, it is inevitable. Massive multiplayer online games (MMOs) are a new cultural phenomenon at the intersection of electronic entertainment and social networking. Borrowing the key design principles from these games can address a host of classic challenges in the workplace including collaboration, innovation, leadership, and of course, boredom. No longer the sole domain of adolescent boys, today’s best complex social games capture countless of hours of attention from men and women across the age spectrum who are carrying out activities in these entertainment titles that look surprisingly like the same tasks being performed by enterprise information-workers. There is a lot to be learned from the context that makes this behavior engaging, for example: positioning tasks within compelling stories that matter to the player, providing the tools for internal marketplaces where economic behavior replaces command and control, and affordances that help solve the problem of “what do I get when we win” Reeves and Read show how to choose and implement the right elements for your business. Of course, the psychological power of game design can have both positive and negative consequences for the workplace. That’s why it’s important to put them into practice correctly from the beginning–and Reeves and Read explain how by showing which good design principles are powerful antidotes to the addictive and stress-inducing potential of games. Supported by specific case studies and years of research, Total Engagement completely changes the way you view both work and play.
View
View
Heuristics for Designing Enjoyable User Interfaces: Lessons from Computer Games
Article
  • Jan 1982
In this paper, I will discuss two questions: (1) Why are computer games so captivating? and (2) How can the features that make computer games captivating be used to make other user interfaces interesting and enjoyable to use? After briefly summarizing several studies of what makes computer games fun, I will discuss some guidelines for designing enjoyable user interfaces. Even though I will focus primarily on what makes systems enjoyable, I will suggest how some of the same features that make systems enjoyable can also make them easier to learn and to use.
View
What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games
Article
  • Jan 1980
In this paper, I will describe my intuitions about what makes computer games fun. More detailed descriptions of the experiments and the theory on which this paper is based are given by Malone (1980a, 1980b). My primary goal here is to provide a set of heuristics or guidelines for designers of instructional computer games. I have articulated and organized common sense principles to spark the creativity of instructional designers (see Banet, 1979, for an unstructured list of similar principles). To demonstrate the usefulness of these principles, I have included several applications to actual or proposed instructional games. Throughout the paper I emphasize games with educational uses, but I focus on what makes the games fun, not on what makes them educational. Though I will not emphasize the point in this paper, these same ideas can be applied to other educational environments and life situations. In a sense, the categories I will describe constitute a general taxonomy of intrinsic motivation—of what makes an activity fun or rewarding for its own sake rather than for the sake of some external reward (See Lepper and Greene, 1979). I think the essential characteristics of good computer games and other intrinsically enjoyable situations can be organized into three categories: challenge, fantasy, and curiosity.
View