Conference PaperPDF Available

The cost of interrupted work: More speed and stress


Abstract and Figures

We performed an empirical study to investigate whether the context of interruptions makes a difference. We found that context does not make a difference but surprisingly, people completed interrupted tasks in less time with no difference in quality. Our data suggests that people compensate for interruptions by working faster, but this comes at a price: experiencing more stress, higher frustration, time pressure and effort. Individual differences exist in the management of interruptions: personality measures of openness to experience and need for personal structure predict disruption costs of interruptions. We discuss implications for how system design can support interrupted work. Author Keywords Multi-tasking, interruptions, experiment, context
Content may be subject to copyright.
The Cost of Interrupted Work: More Speed and Stress
Gloria Mark
Department of Informatics
University of California, Irvine
Irvine, CA, U.S.A. 92697
Daniela Gudith and Ulrich Klocke
Institute of Psychology
Humboldt University
Berlin, Germany,
We performed an empirical study to investigate whether the
context of interruptions makes a difference. We found that
context does not make a difference but surprisingly, people
completed interrupted tasks in less time with no difference
in quality. Our data suggests that people compensate for
interruptions by working faster, but this comes at a price:
experiencing more stress, higher frustration, time pressure
and effort. Individual differences exist in the management
of interruptions: personality measures of openness to
experience and need for personal structure predict
disruption costs of interruptions. We discuss implications
for how system design can support interrupted work.
Author Keywords
Multi-tasking, interruptions, experiment, context
ACM Classification Keywords
H5. Information interfaces and presentation: H.5.2 User
Interfaces: Theory and Methods
The role of interruptions in the workplace has begun to
receive a lot of attention in HCI in the last few years.
Empirical studies have focused on identifying the extent of
interruptions and how they affect tasks [6], the recovery of
tasks after an interruption [3, 9], and timing of
interruptions, e.g. [1]. Spurred on by these field and
laboratory studies systems have been developed to help
people manage interruptions (e.g. [3]. Yet as more studies
in multi-tasking and interruptions emerge, so do conflicting
ideas on how interruptions might affect work.
In a field study of managers, Hudson et al. [8] reported that
interruptions might be beneficial. Other lab and diary study
results have described them as detrimental [1, 3]. Mark et
al. [10] on the other hand discovered that interruption
effects might be more nuanced: in a field study their
informants reported that interruptions of the same context
as the current task were beneficial, whereas interruptions of
a different context than the current task were disruptive.
We decided to investigate the different perspectives raised
by these studies. Interruptions during the course of the
workday might be of the same context as the current task
at-hand or they might be random, related to other topics. If
indeed interruptions as the same context as the task at-hand
are beneficial, then this has important implications for
system design. For example, systems might be designed to
help colleagues gear their interruptions to others so as
match the context of their tasks.
We were interested in measuring the disruption cost of
interruptions. One type of a disruption cost is the additional
time to reorient back to an interrupted task after the
interruption is handled. These previous studies introduce
conflicting notions as to whether the interruption context is
related to a disruption cost. For example, one might be
working on a paper and be interrupted by a completely
different topic, such as a question about a budget. If an
interruption has a different context than the current task at-
hand, this could introduce a disruption cost as it involves a
cognitive shift of context to attend to the interruption, and
then one must reorient back to attend to the interrupted task.
On the other hand, one might be interrupted by a question
that concerns the same context as the paper one is working
on. This might be beneficial but if the context of the
interruption and primary task are similar, this could lead to
interference with the primary task [5] and in this way may
introduce a disruption cost. A third possibility is that the
interruption context may not matter. Perhaps any
discontinuity in the task creates a disruption cost for work.
Disruption costs of interruptions can also involve other
factors such as stress. A second question that we asked is
how interrupted work might change the state of a user; is
interrupted work significantly more stressful or viewed as
more effortful than noninterrupted work? Though we might
intuitively believe it does, it remains an open question.
Disruption costs might also be mitigated by personality
factors. We expected that a) the more open one is to new
experiences (and thus better able to handle new tasks), and
b) the less need one has for personal structure (and thus is
more flexible), the lower the disruption cost would be. We
reasoned that these measures would indicate if some can
adapt quicker than others to a new situation (the
interruption) and then reorient back to the task. Such
individual differences could be used to design
customization in a system to adapt to workplace
The goal of our experiment was to better understand how
interruptions affect work: its patterns, user strategies, and
disruption costs in order to inform system design to help
people manage interrupted work.
A 3x2 factorial experimental design was used. The within-
subject factor was interruption context with three levels: no
interruption (B, baseline), same-context interruption (S),
and different-context interruption (D). The order of
interruption context was fully counter-balanced. Because
interruptions can come through various sources, we
checked whether media might affect the context of
interruptions. The between-subjects factor was media type:
subjects were interrupted with telephone or IM.
Forty-eight subjects participated. 81% of subjects were
German university students with a mean age of 26; all had a
German high school degree (roughly equivalent to one year
in a U.S. university). Most majored in psychology (27.1%),
medicine/sciences (16.7%), or mathematics/engineering/IT
(10.4%). Fifteen were males and 33 were females. All but
one participant had been using email for at least two years.
Half of the subjects had been using IM for at least one year
or longer; 29.2% had never used IM before. Subjects were
paid 12 Euros for their participation.
Experimental task. We simulated an office environment in
the lab and chose an email task, common in information
work. Subjects read instructions that they were to play a
role as a human resource manager at a medium-sized craft
supply company. They had just returned from vacation and
were carefully instructed in all conditions (and were given
incentives) to answer all emails in their inbox as quickly,
correctly and politely as possible. Subjects were given a
simple fact sheet to use in answering the emails, e.g. staff
job levels and education, overtime hours, etc. For each
interruption type condition, subjects had to answer 12
emails. Based on pilot studies, the emails in the folders
were equally distributed by topics. We confirmed in the
pilot study that the email questions in all conditions were
equally demanding. The content of the emails consisted of
questions from various people, e.g. Where do I get more
information on internships in your company?” Subjects first
performed one trial email with the experimenter to
familiarize them with the equipment and the task.
Interruptions. Subjects were told that their “supervisor” (the
experimenter who sat in another room) would contact them
periodically and ask questions. No interruptions were given
in the baseline condition (B). In the S condition participants
were interrupted by the supervisor with questions
concerning the human resource context (e.g. “How many
employees, including you, are in the department today?”).
These questions were of the same context as the primary
email task, i.e. human resources. In the D condition subjects
were interrupted by the supervisor with questions about a
different topic not related to the context of human
resources. These interruptions were on random topics, such
as the upcoming company party (e.g. “How many hot dogs
do we need for 240 employees?”). These types of random
interruptions were designed to simulate the types of
interruptions one might expect in real office work. Pilot
studies confirmed that questions in the S and D conditions
were judged by subjects to be same and different contexts,
respectively, to the human resource scheme.
Subjects were instructed to attend to interruptions
immediately, i.e. to pick up the telephone or attend to the
IM window. Interruption frequency was set to two minutes,
based on observations from [6] and the pilot experiments.
During the experiment, the experimenter adjusted the length
of time for interruptions to try to make the times as equal as
possible across conditions.
Dependent variables: Our primary variable of interest was
the total time to perform the task. The total time needed to
complete each block of emails and the time spent on
interruptions were manually recorded. The time to perform
the task was computed as [total time to perform task – time
spent on interruptions]. If the time to perform the task was
higher with an interruption, then this could indicate that
extra time was needed to perform the task after an
interruption. We expected less politeness and more errors in
email messages that were disrupted. A politeness metric
was computed by assigning points for the use of standard
greeting/closing phrases and polite words (e.g. Dear Mr.;
sincerely yours, please, thank you). Errors were measured
as spelling errors, typos or others (e.g. misspelled names).
Subjective Workload was measured by a modified NASA
Task Load Index (TLX) [7], used by [1]. We added a stress
measure to the six given rating scales: mental and physical
demands, performance, and temporal demand, which we
changed to time pressure, effort, and frustration. Subjects
rated these factors on the standard NASA 20-point scale.
Personality measures. ‘Openness to experience’ was
measured as part of the NEO Personality Inventory Revised
using the Openness to Actions subscale of the German
translation [11] since these items best fit our topic. Ten
items of the Personal Need for Structure (PNS) subscale
from the Need for Cognitive Closure/Personal Need for
Structure inventory were used [2], (e.g. “I do not like it at
all to change my plans at the last minute.”).
Procedure. The experiment was conducted at a university
lab and took about 1! hours. Subjects were randomly
assigned to media type and to the interruption order (the
treatments were counterbalanced with six permutations).
Subjects first filled out a questionnaire to obtain personality
measure scores and demographic and computer experience
information. Subjects then performed the task for each
interruption context. After completing each block of emails,
subjects assessed the workload measures in a questionnaire.
Our first research question was whether the context of the
interruption matters. We performed repeated measures
analyses with media type as a between-subjects factor.
Means are shown in Table 1. For Time to Perform Task
there was a significant difference between interruption
types (F(2,77.98) =3.36, p<.05). Surprisingly, paired
contrasts showed that subjects took the longest time in the
baseline condition to perform the task (B vs. S:
F(1,46=4.22), p<.05; B vs. D: F(1,46=4.13), p<.05). There
was no significant difference between S and D contexts.
Time to
errors in
of email
Baseline (no
Table 1. Mean measures of task performance (s.d.). *=p<.05.
There was no significant difference of media type, i.e.
whether subjects were interrupted by telephone or IM
(F(1,92)=.20, p<.66). There was no significant interaction
of media type and interruption type on time to perform task.
We found there was no significant difference in the number
of errors that were made across interruption types
(F(2,92)=1.70, p<.19). We compared our politeness metric
and found no significant difference across conditions
(F(2,92)=.10, p<.91). For both variables, we found no
interaction with media type.
It was possible that the reason that it took longer to do the
task in the uninterrupted condition is because people wrote
more. We examined the length of the email messages across
conditions. A repeated measures analysis on the average
number of words per email (Table 1) showed that there was
a significant difference among conditions (F(2,92)=3.34,
p<.04). Email messages were longest in the B condition,
with no interruptions (B vs. S: F(1,46=5.57), p<.05; B vs.
D: F(1,46=2.20), p<.15). There was no significant
interaction of media type with number of words.
Openness to experience
Need for personal structure
Table 2. Regression coefficients for personality measures.
As a control, we checked whether the actual time spent on
interruptions was different in the same or different contexts
as longer interruptions could introduce a higher disruption
cost. We found no significant difference in interruption
length (difference=.62 min, sd=2.8), t(47)=1.52, p<.14).
Personality variables. We next examined to what extent the
measures of openness to experience, and need for personal
structure are predictive of the amount of time one needs to
complete a task that is constantly interrupted. Our primary
variable of interest was disruption cost and since there was
no difference in time to complete the task between
same/different interruption contexts, we combined the times
for these conditions to form a single dependent measure
(time to complete the task - time spent on interruptions). A
stepwise regression analysis using the personality measures
as predictors showed that both ‘openness to actions and
‘need for personal structure’ are significant predictors of the
time to complete an interrupted task (F(2,47)=3.41, p<.04),
R2=.14). There is an inverse relationship: the higher one
scores on ‘openness to experience’ and ‘need for personal
structure’, the quicker it takes to complete an interrupted
task (Table 2).
Baseline (no
Same context
Table 3. Mean (s.d.) workload measures across interruption
types. Scale is 1(low)-20 (high), *=p<.05, **p<.01.
Measures of workload. We tested the difference of the
NASA mental workload measures (Table 3) across
interruption type. A repeated measures analysis showed a
significant difference (F(2,92)=3.82, p<.03). Workload was
highest for the D context condition (D vs. B: F(1,46=7.38),
p<.01; D vs. S: F(1,46=2.09), p<.16). We also found that
stress was rated as significantly different across interruption
type (F(2,92)=12.15, p<.001) and was highest for both
interruption conditions (S vs. B: F(1,46=20.32), p<.001; D
vs. B: F(1,46=14.94), p<.001). Level of frustration was also
significantly different across interruption types (F(2,92)-
5.21, p<.007), and highest in the interruption conditions (S
vs. B: F(1,46=7.88), p<.01; D vs. B: F(1,46=7.55), p<.01).
Time pressure was also rated significantly different across
interruption types (F(2,92)=4.71, p<.01), with highest time
pressure rated in the interruption conditions (S vs. B:
F(1,46=10.65), p<.01; D vs. B: F(1,46=3.65), p<.10). The
amount of effort invested in the task was also significantly
different across interruption types (F(2,79)=8.50, p<.001),
with most effort reported in the interruption conditions (S
vs. B: F(1,46=6.92), p<.05; D vs. B: F(1,46=14.60),
p<.001). There was no interaction with media type in any of
these measures.
Our results showed that any interruption introduces a
change in work pattern and is not related to context per se.
Our results differ from [5] who found similarity of
cognitive processes of interruptions to a task were
disruptive. We looked instead at similarity of the content of
interruptions and a task. Also, [4] found that interruptions
extremely consistent with the task were facilitating. Our
interruption context shared the same topic as the main
(email) task but unlike [4] the operations and details
differed. Together, our study along with [10], who report
participants’ subjective views, show that interruptions that
share a context with the main task may be perceived as
being beneficial but the actual disruption cost is the same as
with a different context.
Surprisingly our results show that interrupted work is
performed faster. We offer an interpretation. When people
are constantly interrupted, they develop a mode of working
faster (and writing less) to compensate for the time they
know they will lose by being interrupted. Yet working
faster with interruptions has its cost: people in the
interrupted conditions experienced a higher workload, more
stress, higher frustration, more time pressure, and effort. So
interrupted work may be done faster, but at a price.
Our results suggest that interruptions lead people to change
not only work rhythms but also strategies and mental states.
Another possibility is that interruptions do in fact lengthen
the time to perform a task but that this extra time only
occurs directly after the interruption when reorienting back
to the task, and it can be compensated for by a faster and
more stressful working style. More sophisticated
measurements of working speed directly after an
interruption must be done to test this. We found that the
more open one is to experiences, the quicker one handled
interrupted work and surprisingly, we found the same
relation for those who score high on needing personal
structure. Perhaps those who need personal structure are
better able to manage their time when interrupted.
While laboratory studies are always subject to criticism of
ecological validity, our task design was based on real
fieldwork. We simulated office conditions using an email
task, which is different from many laboratory studies of
attention switching that use abstract tasks. The lab
environment enabled us to isolate variables of interest.
Our results have implications for system design. A certain
amount of interruptions may be tolerable because people
can compensate with a higher working speed. However,
technology could be used to keep track of and control
interruptions over a long period of time so as not to
overload people (as our mental workload measures
suggest). After only 20 minutes of interrupted performance
people reported significantly higher stress, frustration,
workload, effort, and pressure. We cannot say whether
people would cope over time or if these measures would
only increase. Our results confirm experimentally the
anecdotal reports of informants in field studies who
describe high stress when interrupted in real work situations
[10]. Our data also contributed to finding individual
differences in interruptions. Our personality measures
suggest the need for customization for systems to fit
people’s preferred interruption tolerance. We hope that our
study will spark continued interest in this area.
1. Adamczyk P. D. & Bailey B. P. If not now, when? The
effects of interruption at different moments within task
execution. Proceedings of CHI’04, (2004), 271-278.
2. Collani, G. Eine deutsche Skala zum Konstrukt
Bedürfnis nach kognitiver Geschlossenheit
(NFCC)/Persönliches Strukturbedürfnis (PNS). In A.
Glöckner-Rist (Ed.), ZUMA-Informationssystem.
Mannheim: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und
Analysen (2004).
3. Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., and Wilhite, S. A diary
study of task switching and interruptions. Proceedings of
CHI'04, (2004), 175-182.
4. Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E. and Horvitz, E., Instant
messaging: Effects of relevance and timing. Proc. of
HCI’00, British Computer Society (2000), 71-76.
5. Gillie, T. & Broadbent, D. What makes interruptions
disruptive? A study of length, similarity and complexity.
Psych Research, 50, (1989), 243–250.
6. Gonzáles, V. & Mark, G. Constant, constant, multi-
tasking craziness: managing multiple working spheres.
Proceedings of CHI ‘04, (2004), 113-120.
7. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. Development of a multi-
dimensional workload rating scale: Results of empirical
and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati
(Eds.), Human mental workload, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands: Elsevier, (1988), 139-183.
8. Hudson, J.M., Christensen, J., Kellogg, W.A. and
Erickson, T. “I’d be overwhelmed, but it’s just one more
thing to do:” Availability and interruption in research
management. Proc. of CHI 2002, (2002), 97-104.
9. Iqbal, S.T. and E. Horvitz, Disruption and recovery of
computing tasks: Field study, analysis, and directions,
Proceedings of CHI 2007, 677-686.
10. Mark, G., Gonzalez, V., and Harris, J. No Task Left
Behind? Examining the Nature of Fragmented Work.
Proceedings of CHI’05, (2005), 113-120.
11. Ostendorf, F & Angleitner, A. NEO-
Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae,
Revidierte Fassung (NEO-PI-R). Manual. Göttingen:
Hogrefe, (2003).
... As a result, technology use's negative effects can lead to physiological and psychological issues. Technostress can cause physiological symptoms such as tiredness (Salanova et al., 2014), crankiness, and insomnia (Porter and Kakabadse, 2006), as well as psychological problems, including a sense of frustration, perceived time pressure, and increased cognitive load (Mark et al., 2008), skepticism, and a sense of incompetence (Salanova et al., 2014). Technostress can also indirectly affect organizational outcomes, such as deteriorated work ethics, dissatisfaction with work, work-life conflicts, and reduced employee productivity (Tarafdar et al., 2007). ...
... Finally, techno-uncertainty denotes the situation when a user perceives the introduction of new ICT as a manifestation of instability and unpredictability (Tarafdar et al., 2007). The third strand of research focuses on the causes or contributing factors of Technostress, which have been suggested to include lack of institutional support (Wang et al., 2008;Salanova et al., 2014), fatigue (Khuntia et al., 2015), interruptions resulting from multitasking (Mark et al., 2008;Ragu-Nathan et al., 2008;Tarafdar et al., 2015), absence of effective personal coping mechanisms (Rohwer et al., 2022), and other demographic factors (Ursavaş et al., 2011;Tarafdar et al., 2015). ...
... The moderating effect of perceived school support suggests that the availability of resources (support) can buffer the negative impact of technology intensity on work-family conflicts, aligning with the protective and buffering role of resources proposed by the COR theory. Technostress has been associated with various factors, including lack of institutional support (Wang et al., 2008;Salanova et al., 2014), interruptions caused by multitasking (Mark et al., 2008;Ragu-Nathan et al., 2008;Tarafdar et al., 2015), and inadequate personal coping mechanisms (Rohwer et al., 2022). ...
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a global shift toward online education, which has increased the use of technology for communication, management, and remote teaching. This study aimed to investigate how primary school teachers in China used technology during the Pandemic and to what extent they experienced Technostress, as well as the impact of Technostress on work–family conflicts and technology-induced health issues. A survey was conducted among 1,172 primary school teachers, and the results revealed that teachers exhibited a moderate to a high level of Technostress during the Pandemic, with differences observed in gender, age, and headteacher duties. Furthermore, Technostress was positively correlated with work–family conflicts and technology-induced health issues. Technology use intensity was found to directly impact work–family conflicts and personal health and indirectly impact them via the agency effects of Technostress. School support moderated the indirect relationship between technology use intensity and work–family conflicts and health issues, with higher levels of school support leading to less apparent impacts of technology intensity on work–family conflicts and personal health via the agency effect of Technostress. These findings provide timely insights for post-pandemic teacher training and technology management and suggest the importance of school support in promoting sustainable educational development.
... Conversely, a developer who is frequently interrupted from their main coding tasks to support co-workers might have a positive impact on team productivity, but feel that their individual productivity suffers as a result. Frequent interruptions have further been associated with higher error rates, lower work performance, higher anxiety and increased stress, which is why many developers are actively trying to limit them [3,19,43,48,50]. On the other hand, receiving social support from supervisors and co-workers and being more open to communication in general, was shown to be positively associated with job satisfaction, well-being and reducing work-related stress [45,61,73]. ...
... Also, for most participants, the hourly self-reports were a good trade-off and łnot too much and not too littlež ( 8 ), and even helped to get łin the continuous flow of self-reflectionž ( 7 ). For very few, they were too many, and one stated that łit confirmed my feelings but it also interrupted my 'flow' and took more time than I anticipatedž ( 43 Finding. Frequent reflection on work, productivity, and time well spent generally increased awareness, helped to optimize work habits and days, increased productivity, and improved participants' feeling about themselves, their work, and their work-life balance. ...
Full-text available
While there has been significant study of both individuals and teams of knowledge workers, research has focused largely on one or the other, with less focus on the interaction between the two. In this paper, we explore the tensions between the individual and their team, focusing on the choices an individual makes towards their own productivity versus their team's productivity. We developed a technology probe with a team nudge that fosters recurring reflection and prompts individuals to consider how their team helps them to be productive. We examined its impact through a longitudinal field study with 48 participants. We chose to undertake this study with software development teams as they are examples of knowledge workers who collaborate on a shared set of tasks with specific goals. Our exploration took place with hybrid development teams, which have increasingly become the norm. Our analysis of a total of 8338 hourly self-reports and 1389 daily diary entries found that the team nudge increased participants' productivity ratings and team awareness, led to participants spending more time on their own tasks, reshaped their perceptions of themselves and their team, yet, in general, did not increase team cohesion or affect well-being.
... This can lead to an increased perception of workload as tasks take longer to complete due to the interruptions. Individuals tend to compensate for the distractions by working harder to make up for lost time or to regain focus on their tasks and this increased effort results in higher frustration and stress levels (Mark et al., 2008). Another study explored the effects of interruptions on employees' wellbeing and job satisfaction (Trougakos et al., 2008) and reported that frequent interruptions disrupted workflow, leading to increased psychological strain and decreased job satisfaction. ...
Full-text available
In our modern society, digital devices, social media platforms, and artificial intelligence (AI) tools have become integral components of our daily lives, profoundly intertwined with our daily activities. These technologies have undoubtedly brought convenience, connectivity, and speed, making our lives easier and more efficient. However, their influence on our brain function and cognitive abilities cannot be ignored. This review aims to explore both the positive and negative impacts of these technologies on crucial cognitive functions, including attention, memory, addiction, novelty-seeking and perception, decision-making, and critical thinking, as well as learning abilities. The review also discusses the differential influence of digital technology across different age groups and the unique challenges and benefits experienced by children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Strategies to maximize the benefits of the digital world while mitigating its potential drawbacks are also discussed. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the intricate relationship between humans and technology. It underscores the need for further research in this rapidly evolving field and the importance of informed decision-making regarding our digital engagement to support optimal cognitive function and wellbeing in the digital era.
... Monk et al. (2008) believes that interruptions during critical tasks can lead to errors, emphasizing the negative impact of interruptions on task accuracy and completion. Mark, Gudith and Klocke (2008) opine that interruptions during task performance can lead to decreased accuracy and poorer retention of information, indicating that interruptions can disrupt learning and memory processes. However, interruptions, whether external (e.g., notifications, conversations) or internal (e.g., thoughts, distractions), can have a detrimental effect on academic performance. ...
Full-text available
Time planning and academic performance in Ritman University, Ikot Ekpene, Akwa Ibom State Nigeria
... W. Brown & Ryan, 2003;Freeman & Muraven, 2010). For example, research suggests that interruptions during work do not only result in a diminished performance but make individuals feel drained, more stressed, and frustrated (Keller et al., 2020;Kushlev & Dunn, 2015;Mark et al., 2008;Puranik et al., 2021;Zijlstra et al., 1999). And batching smartphone notificationsand hence reducing fragmentation -resulted in less inattention with positive effects on stress and affective outcomes (Fitz et al., 2019). ...
Smartphones are an integral part of daily life for many people worldwide. However, concerns have been raised that long usage times and the fragmentation of daily life through smartphone usage are detrimental to wellbeing. This preregistered study assesses (1) whether differences in smartphone usage behaviors between individuals predict differences in a variety of well-being measures (between-person effects) and (2) whether differences in smartphone usage behaviors between situations predict whether an individual is feeling better or worse (within-person effects). In addition to total usage time, several indicators capturing the fragmentation of usage/nonusage time were developed. The study combines objectively measured smartphone usage with selfreports of well-being in surveys (N = 236) and an experience sampling period (N = 378, n = 5775 datapoints). To ensure the robustness of the results, we replicated our analyses in a second measurement period (surveys: N = 305; experience sampling: N = 534, n = 7287 datapoints) and considered the pattern of effects across different operational definitions and constructs. Results show that individuals who use their smartphone more report slightly lower well-being (between-person effect) but no evidence for within-person effects of total usage time emerged. With respect to fragmentation, we found no robust association with well-being.
Purpose During everyday work, individuals often engage in unplanned conversations that help them develop relationships, share information and coordinate tasks. Unfortunately, the work-from-home mandates issued due to the pandemic have reduced the frequency of unplanned conversations among employees. So, as businesses reopen, organizations are considering post-pandemic workplace solutions that can facilitate unplanned conversations. To aid these efforts and move research and theory on unplanned conversations forward, this study proposes and tests a multi-factor model of the antecedents of unplanned conversations. Design/methodology/approach This study adopted a multi-methodological approach and collected data using automated sensing technology, structured observations and cross-sectional survey methods. A total of 5,297 unplanned conversations among 61 employees were recorded using the custom mobile application and structured observations. Cross-sectional survey data about these employees' work contexts were also collected. Findings The study results showed that the model significantly predicted the frequency of unplanned conversations. Notably, technical expertise, perceived time pressure and team psychological safety significantly predicted the frequency of unplanned conversations. The study findings have both theoretical and practical significance. Originality/value Previous research studies have primarily focused on the influence of workplace designs on unplanned conversations. However, this study demonstrates that several other factors facilitate unplanned conversations. This research theorizes and empirically tests the relationship between unplanned conversations and several individual, team and organizational factors.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Most current designs of information technology are based on the notion of supporting distinct tasks such as document production, email usage, and voice communication. In this paper we present empirical results that suggest that people organize their work in terms of much larger and thematically connected units of work. We present results of fieldwork observation of information workers in three different roles: analysts, software developers, and managers. We discovered that all of these types of workers experience a high level of discontinuity in the execution of their activities. People average about three minutes on a task and somewhat more than two minutes using any electronic tool or paper document before switching tasks. We introduce the concept of working spheres to explain the inherent way in which individuals conceptualize and organize their basic units of work. People worked in an average of ten different working spheres. Working spheres are also fragmented; people spend about 12 minutes in a working sphere before they switch to another. We argue that design of information technology needs to support people's continual switching between working spheres.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
We present data from detailed observation of 24 information workers that shows that they experience work fragmentation as common practice. We consider that work fragmentation has two components: length of time spent in an activity, and frequency of interruptions. We examined work fragmentation along three dimensions: effect of collocation, type of interruption, and resumption of work. We found work to be highly fragmented: people average little time in working spheres before switching and 57% of their working spheres are interrupted. Collocated people work longer before switching but have more interruptions. Most internal interruptions are due to personal work whereas most external interruptions are due to central work. Though most interrupted work is resumed on the same day, more than two intervening activities occur before it is. We discuss implications for technology design: how our results can be used to support people to maintain continuity within a larger framework of their working spheres.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
We report on a field study of the multitasking beha vior of computer users focused on the suspension and resumption of tasks. Data was collected with a tool that logge d users' interactions with software applications and their a ssociated windows, as well as incoming instant messaging and email alerts. We describe methods, summarize results, and discuss design guidelines suggested by the findings. Author Keywords
Full-text available
Many CSCW projects dealing with individual availability and interruption filtering achieve only limited success. Perhaps this is because designers of such systems have limited evidence to draw upon; most data on interruption management is at least a decade old. This study uses an empirical sampling method and qualitative interviews to examine attitudes toward availability and interruption. Specifically, we analyze how corporate research managers spend their time and look at how their attitudes toward interruption relate to their various activities. Attitudes toward interruption are marked by a complex tension between wanting to avoid interruption and appreciating its usefulness. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for design, suggesting that the notion of socially translucent systems may be a fruitful approach.
Full-text available
We report on a diary study of the activities of information workers aimed at characterizing how people interleave multiple tasks amidst interruptions. The week-long study revealed the type and complexity of activities performed, the nature of the interruptions experienced, and the difficulty of shifting among numerous tasks. We present key findings from the diary study and discuss implications of the findings. Finally, we describe promising directions in the design of software tools for task management, motivated by the findings.
Full-text available
Instant messaging (IM) has grown rapidly to involve millions of users spanning a variety of platforms. This paper outlines two preliminary studies that examined the effects of IM notifications on ongoing desktop computer productivity tasks. Results from the studies show that the disruptiveness of IM to productivity tasks is reduced if the incoming message is highly relevant to the current task, or if messages are queued until certain key computing operations have been completed. User interface design principles for the control of messaging are proposed based on the results.
Classic work on interruptions by Zeigarnik showed that tasks that were interrupted were more likely to be recalled after a delay than tasks that were not interrupted. Much of the literature on interruptions has been devoted to examining this effect, although more recently interruptions have been used to choose between competing designs for interfaces to complex devices. However, none of this work looks at what makes some interruptions disruptive and some not. This series of experiments uses a novel computer-based adventure-game methodology to investigate the effects of the length of the interruption, the similarity of the interruption to the main task, and the complexity of processing demanded by the interruption. It is concluded that subjects make use of some form of non-articulatory memory which is not affected by the length of the interruption. It is affected by processing similar material however, and by a complex mentalarithmetic task which makes large demands on working memory.
Conference Paper
User attention is a scarce resource, and users are susceptible to interruption overload. Systems do not reason about the effects of interrupting a user during a task sequence. In this study, we measure effects of interrupting a user at different moments within task execution in terms of task performance, emotional state, and social attribution. Task models were developed using event perception techniques, and the resulting models were used to identify interruption timings based on a user's predicted cognitive load. Our results show that different interruption moments have different impacts on user emotional state and positive social attribution, and suggest that a system could enable a user to maintain a high level of awareness while mitigating the disruptive effects of interruption. We discuss implications of these results for the design of an attention manager.
Revidierte Fassung (NEO-PI-R). Manual
  • F Ostendorf
  • A Angleitner
  • Neo-Persönlichkeitsinventar Nach Costa Und Mccrae
Ostendorf, F & Angleitner, A. NEO- Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae, Revidierte Fassung (NEO-PI-R). Manual. Göttingen: Hogrefe, (2003).