ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Many companies, especially Japanese companies, have implemented information security with bottom up approach, starting from implementing piece by piece security controls. As increase the number of information security incidents and spread its impact, companies have implemented many measures in the wide spectrum, from technical counter measure systems (firewalls to protect internal network) to security management. Japanese government has introduced compliance schemes for protecting privacy data and computers from illegal access. In addition, Ministry of Economics, Trade and Industry (METI) proposed private companies to enhance information security governance capabilities with the tools such as "Information Security Report Model" (here after IS for 'Information Security'), "IS Management Benchmarking" and "Business Continuity Planning Guide (BCP)".IS Management System (ISMS) certification, IS Auditing and IS Rating scheme are also introduced to assure the implementation of security. Then, there are so many measures existing separately. Corporate Executives (CEO and board of directors including CIO, CRO, and CISO etc.) have come to know the amount of investment for security measures is too large to pay. This paper propose Information Security Governance (here in after, ISG) Framework which combines and inter-relates many existing information security schemes. With this ISG framework, Corporate Executives can direct, monitor, and evaluate IS related activities in a unified manner.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Information Security Governance Framework
Eijiroh Ohki
Faculty of Informatics
Kogakuin University
Yonosuke Harada
Executive Research Director
InfoCom Research, Inc.
and Professor
Osaka University
Shuji Kawaguchi
Senior Project Manager
Information Security Research Group
Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc.
Tetsuo Shiozaki
General Manager,
Information Security Center, Security Solutions Unit,
Fujitsu Limited
Tetsuyuki Kagaua
Associate Professor
Graduate School of Commerce and Management,
Hitotsubashi University
Many companies, especially Japanese companies, have
implemented information security with bottom up approach, starting
from implementing piece by piece security controls. As increase the
number of information security incidents and spread its impact,
companies have implemented many measures in the wide spectrum,
from technical counter measure systems (firewalls to protect internal
network) to security management.
Japanese government has introduced compliance schemes for
protecting privacy data and computers from illegal access. In
addition, Ministry of Economics, Trade and Industry (METI)
proposed private companies to enhance information security
governance capabilities with the tools such as “Information Security
Report Model” (here after IS for ‘Information Security’), “IS
Management Benchmarking” and “Business Continuity Planning
Guide (BCP)”.[6] IS Management System (ISMS) certification, IS
Auditing and IS Rating scheme are also introduced to assure the
implementation of security.
Then, there are so many measures existing separately. Corporate
Executives (CEO and board of directors including CIO, CRO, and
CISO etc.) have come to know the amount of investment for
security measures is too large to pay.
This paper propose Information Security Governance (here in
after, ISG) Framework which combines and inter-relates many
existing information security schemes. With this ISG framework,
Corporate Executives can direct, monitor, and evaluate IS related
activities in a unified manner. [1]
Categories and Subject Descriptors
K.6.4 System Management: Information Systems Management
System and its Governance, K.6.1 Project and People Management :
Board of Directors and Executives responsibility and accountability,
K.6.5 Security and Protection:
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for
personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are
not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies
bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise,
or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior
specific permission and/or a fee.
WISG’09, November 13, 2009, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Copyright 2009 ACM 978-1-60558-787-5/09/11...$10.00.
General Terms
Management, Measurement, Security, Standardization
Governance standards, formal governance models, formal audit
models, governance architecture and implementation, risk
1. Introduction
Rapid increase of computer and internet utilization in these two
decades brought the Information Society. Companies and
organizations have been eagerly utilizing computers and internet
for business. At same time, misuse of computers and illegal
conducts are increasing with the growth of computerization. IT
ability has become to store several gigabytes of data in a finger
size USB stick which can store more than million privacy data.
Once such data has been exposed, many people will be suffered
with spam mail, direct sales telephone and so on. Nowadays, we
have seen Corporate Executives of the company are apologizing
to the victims once the company exposed their information.
Information security incidents often influence to the corporate
processes and operations directly. For example, if company
develop and operate global value chain, they have to share
information assets broadly with their business partners. Definitely,
they need a secure system to share information assets to build and
maintain their competitiveness. We should understand that
information assets management should be a major element of
business strategy, and information security measures are directly
connected with the corporate value.
In addition, our business activities deeply depend on IT
infrastructure. Therefore, any IT accident (for example, business
process interruption by system trouble, or the leakage of
confidential data of the partners) may cause a great loss to the
company. There is a research that the news of IT accidents
significantly reduced the company's market value. [4]
On the other hand, disclosing IS related risk information is
expected to suppress negative reaction in the stock market. There
is a research to compare one company that disclosed its IT risk
through its financial statements with the other one that didn't
disclose it. The research indicated that both stock prices reduced
right after the IT accident, but the stock price of the company,
who disclosed the risks in advance, returned to the original level
after several days, while the other remained low for a long time.
It is important for Corporate Executives to take this situation
into consideration, and to review risk management processes from
the viewpoints of the information security. But most executive
regards the corporate information security measures as the
administrators' matter. Most of the companies have implemented
measures for Information Security with bottom-up approaches.
The systematic measures like ISMS are spreading, but the
executives sometimes don't have awareness of risks and measures
that should be shared with administrators and employees. In this
situation, it is difficult for the executives to carry out its
accountability on information security risk.
In Japan, a study group, sponsored by METI, had started efforts
to develop the concept of ISG. In 2005, the group made a model
of “Information Security Report”[6], a tool for a corporate to
explain its information security policy and related activities to
stakeholders, like a model of Corporate Social Responsibility
report (CSR report). METI has recommended this model to the
companies. Some companies published their Information Security
Reports. According to the brand assessment in an industry that
handles security products, the percentage of user companies who
positively evaluate firms that disclose a report on information
security has increased significantly since 2006.[?]
The study group also designed a concept of “Information
Security Management Benchmark” [8] to provide reference data
for enterprises to make sound decisions on measures and
investment of information security. The ISM-Benchmark is a self-
assessment tool to visually check where the level of the
company's security measures resides, by responding questions
about company profile and 25 items of security measures. The
number of accumulated records exceeded 17,000.
In addition, METI made a guideline for Information Security
Audit, in 2003. [7] [9] There are more than 10,000 companies and
organizations during a year that use Information Security Audit.
In this paper, we propose new ISG framework for Corporate
Executives to overcome difficulties around ISM, and make clear
the relationships among ISG and related tools and programs.
2. Requirement for ISG
As we discussed our background in previous section, in most
cases corporate information security programs had started from
bottom to up. Started from the workplace, from piece by piece
security control mainly focusing on technical solution necessary
to protect departmental information assets, based on workplace
risk assessment conducted by department staffs. Later, most
organizations became to understand that there should be effective
management mechanism in place to coordinate these controls to
get more sophisticated outcomes.
Gradually, most organizations became aware of the fact that
these sets of bottom-up security programs might not be able to
solve the difficulties and issues surrounding information security.
Even if they have management mechanism to coordinate these
controls, they will not be effective enough without clear
alignment and interconnection between the management
mechanisms and corporate governance mechanism.
In addition to these management mechanism, ISG, Information
Security Governance, has become recognized to be a key portion
of corporate security program, requested as a part of corporate
governance framework.
The word “ISG” has become familiar these days, but almost
nobody clearly knows the functions of ISG and differences
between ISG and ISM yet. Most difficulties and issues remain
From the Systems engineering perspective, ISG is, of course, a
system composed of several elements; each element has
interrelationships with other constituent elements, and pursues
common objectives as a whole. Difficulties and issues, we face to
govern Corporate Information Security, are suggesting that we
may be missing any key element of ISG, or missing key interfaces
between elements of ISG.
To recover these missing element and interfaces, and to make
governance system more effective, we would better have ISG
framework, an overall picture of ISG, in which all critical
elements explicitly defined with functions of each element, and
interfaces among elements. The framework is a kind of theoretical
model that clearly show the structures and mechanism how ISG
works, and Corporate Executives can understand how they can
map these functions and interfaces to their actual organizations.
It can be easily understood that IGS framework and its function
model must satisfy following three key requirements.
Requirement #1: ISG framework and function model should be
consistently constructed with other corporate risk governance
framework so that executives can make decisions easily and
effectively, since information security is one of the major
corporate risk areas, and management of information security risk
also should be a part of corporate risk management framework.
Requirement #2: At same time, ISG function model also need
to be capable to handle unique characteristics of information
security risk which are essentially different from other risk
categories. Mainly these essential characteristics come from the
differences between BIT and ATOM. BITs can be easily copied,
transmitted and shared around the globe instantly. Information
sharing with specific business partners may bring huge business
advantage, but at same time, single security incident may lead to
total business failure. IGS functional model needs to be capable to
govern risks in such fierce circumstance.
Requirement #3: ISG functional model should be able to
include existing information security management and control
mechanism, such as ISMS, and be able to have effective interface
with the elements of these existing mechanism.
3. Reference model for ISG
3.1 Relation between Corporate Governance,
IT Governance and ISG
Corporate governance includes all aspect of governance to deal
with every risk. Similar to the fact that corporate executives are
responsible for the corporate governance, they are also
responsible for both ITG and ISG. The relation between ISG and
ITG is not clearly defined, although information security is one of
big topics in ITG. ISG includes not only IT security but also
physical security and paper security. Thus the relation with ISG
and ITG is shown in Figure 3.1. [1], [3]
One example of the intersection of ITG and ISG in Figure 3.1
(IT security element) is that a computer access control system
which identifies the accessed personnel by ID and password and
permits him to access to protected data according to his assigned
privilege. Most of automated security controls belong to this
The other examples of non-IT of ISG in Figure 3.1 are paper
security and physical security. Paper may be printed out by use of
IT. However, paper is still used for hand written evidence for a
contract, an approval of purchase, and an entry form into a
secured server room. Those papers are stored safely and protected.
A rule for paper handling is within the responsibility of
executives. Physical security is another example of non-IT where
only restricted personnel can enter into the secured area.
Executives may ask to implement IT to restrict access to the room
with IC card and automated door.
IT security
IT governance
Information security
Corporate governance
Information security
security element
Figure 3.1 Relation between ISG and ITG
3.2 Configuration of the ISG framework
ITG framework has been discussed in ISO/IEC 38500:2008. As
we have stated that ISG has common integral part with ITG, ISG
should be aligned with ISO/IEC 38500:2008[10]. We propose a
new extended model for the ISG framework in Figure 3.2 based
on three requirements stated in chapter 2.
The new model consists of five components, three common
parts with ISO/IEC38500; “Direct” for guiding managements
from the viewpoints of business strategies and risk management,
“Monitor” for ensuring the governance activities visible with
measurable indicators, “Evaluate” for assessing and verifying the
results/outcomes. We extended with two new components for
Information security aspect; “Oversee” for observing and auditing
governance processes, and “Report” for disclosing the report to
the stakeholders (see Figure 3.2).
As shown in Figure 3.2, the framework includes the governing
cycle starting from “Direct,” “Monitor,” and “Evaluate” Information
Security Management (here in after ISM) process. Because ISO/IEC
27001:2005[11] requires “commitment to the establishment,
implementation, operation, monitoring, review, maintenance and
improvement of the ISMS”, the ISG framework should incorporate
with this requirement.
Infor mation S ecurity M anagement
Cor porate
Execu tiv es
Fra mewor k of in form ation
security governance
Management commitment Progress and achievement stat e of PDCA
Note that the stakeholders may select the company as a business
partner or an investment target while taking its ISG activities into
consideration, but stakeholders is not included in the framework
model because they are not controllable.
3.3 “Direct” in the ISG framework
Information security incident response requires quick decision and
action to reduce dames or losses on information asset. “Direct” in
the ISG framework ensures good interaction between executives
and the management to implement good ISM, communication and
preparedness against potential risks. Implementation of “Direct” for
ISG is different from that of ITG, because executives should have
certain role and responsibility on ISM project. If executives think
their role is just order the management, real-time response to
information security incidents may not possible. For ISG, executives
should understand and take combination of actions to ease the
situation. It looks similar to corporate portfolio management.
“Direct” in the ISG also includes defining the scope of the ISM,
formulating a risk analysis, and allocating necessary resources.
Enacting “Security policy” for ISM is the responsibility of
3.4 “Monitor” in the ISG framework
“Monitor” of ISG includes two functions. First function is to
oversee the status of the ISMS PDCA cycle which is comparable to
that of ITG. Management should check the potential risk and assess
preparedness and counter measures put in place. If once the
allowance exceeds the limit set by executives, they should report to
the executives. Sometimes this function is automated and display to
“Dash Board” designed for executives.
Second function is to surveillance of potential Information
Security incident and accident. Real time “Monitor” is crucial to the
security and is not necessary to ITG.
3.5 “Evaluate” in the ISG framework
For “Evaluate” process, executives analyze and measure the
degree of achieving the goals from management data collected in
the “Monitor” process, and take corrective action if necessary.
Major difference from ITG, ISG requires real time decision to
minimize loss, error, or damage caused by security incidents. For
example, in case of SQL injection attack and followed modification
on corporate e-commerce web site, immediate action should be
taken by the management and its impact should be reported
immediately to the executives. Depending on the damage or impact
to corporate business, executives should evaluate it quickly and take
necessary actions on real time. Because of the nature of attacks
against the internet site, it is not possible to forecast when and how.
The early and appropriate response of executives is the key to ease
the tension.
“Evaluate” will activate “Report” to stakeholder to understand
corporate security in Figure 3.2. Nowadays, many stakeholders have
strong interest in corporate security, because his stock price may be
devaluated by security incident. He would ask the company to
disclose the status of information security preparedness.
3.6 “Report” in the ISG framework
“Report” is also proposed to incorporate into the ITG framework
because stakeholders require the transparency and accountability of
Information Security. Similar to the CSR report which is used to
ensure the corporate contributing society, ISG "Report" ensures the
implemented security measures in corporate.
In the past, the occurrence of an accident or incident relating to
information security is rather small and its impact to the society is
not serious, and even such companies were not accused from the
society. However, in recent years, a privacy information exposure or
a service interruption due to system failure happened more
frequently. Stakeholders recognize that those companies have
higher risk and regard them not to trust on their business relations
unless they disclose their security problems and improvement. Thus
it is necessary to disclose activities for information security from an
"accountability" point of view so as to avoid negative hearsay and to
trust from the external stakeholders.
There are two purposes for company to disclose activities for
information security to external stakeholders. The first one is to
announce that the company fulfills its social responsibility by
reporting practical information security activities, with security
incidents if any.
The second purpose is to report activities for information security
from the viewpoint of rising corporate value. These activities can
increase the confidence of the partners and customers, resulting in
constructing a long and stable relationship with the partners as well
as in royalties from the customers. Moreover, if they implement the
strategic management on information assets, then the company's
cash flow may be increasing or stable in the future. As confidential
information including technology and know-how, customer privacy
data, and information networks configurations are strategically most
important, protecting and controlling them is being regarded as an
important business objective. As far as the corporations make no
disclosure, they rarely receive a high rating from the investors and
never obtain a resulting economic effect.
Both purposes are not always exclusive to each other. Disclosing
the security related activities is very important because it has a side
effect on raising information security awareness to employee.
Reporting to the outside “Disclosure” can be regarded as a
“promise” the company gives to the society. This is because
disclosing the activities makes it possible for every employee to be
aware that the "promise" to external stakeholders is important.
Information security disclosure does not mean to disclose
information security vulnerability. This is because if the company
disclose their vulnerability on their firewalls, company web site may
be attacked and increase risk. Companies are not required to open
their weakness to customers, partners, and outsourcers.
In the case of the disclosure from an "accountability" point of
view, it is important to provide content that allow the receivers to
check whether the information security activities are carried out as
explained. The important thing is that what information security
policy is developed, in what sort of information security process are
put in place, and what system ensures the effectiveness is all
observable. Then, disclosing item should include (1) information
security policy, (2) risk evaluation, (3) risk measures and response,
and (4) management system.
In the case of the disclosure from a "value creation" point of view,
the important thing is what kind of economic effect it produces. The
economic effect includes how much cost the information security
activities reduce through making an inventory of information assets,
the extent to which they increase the brand value as well as the trust
of the customers and partners, what economic value protected
information assets have, and how much the implementation of the
activities reduces the risk of damaging the information assets. If
those efforts are visible and accountable, investors can estimate the
corporate value highly and the stock market may give a high price
to the corporate.
According to the corporate brand assessment in an industry that
handles products relating to information security, the percentage of
user companies who positively evaluate other firms that disclose a
report on information security has increased significantly since
2006.[6] Moreover, the former tended to give importance to the
evaluation of information security activities when selecting a partner.
Similarly, higher the company's attitude to information security
activities is, higher the user company's satisfaction is.
Table 3.1 is the example form of Information Security Report
from the trial conducted by METI in 2005. [6]
Table 1: Example of Information Security Report
(1)Basic Information
Includes the purpose of issue of the report, cautions relating
to usage, target periods and responsible departments.
(2)Concept of Management regarding Information Security
Includes policy regarding information-security
undertakings, target scope, ranking of stakeholders in the
report and messages to stakeholders.
(3)Information Security Governance
Information security management system (e.g. placement of
responsibility, organizational structure and compliance),
risks relating to information security and information
security strategy.
(4)Information Security Measures Planning and Goals
Includes action plan and target values
(5)Results and Evaluation of Information Security Measures
Includes results, evaluation, information security quality
improvement activities, management of overseas bases,
outsourcing, social contribution activities relating to
information security and accident reports.
(6)Principle Focal Themes relating to Information Security
Includes internal controls and protection of personal
information, undertakings to be particularly emphasized
such as Business Continuity Plans, introduction to themes
and newly devised points
(7)Third-party Approval, Accreditation, etc. (if acquired)
Includes ISMS compliance evaluation system, information
security audits, privacy mark systems, number of persons
with information security qualifications, classification and
3.7 “Oversee” in the ISG framework
“Oversee” is a kind of auditing function to check and validate
Corporate Executives’ IS related activities. It is very important for
every organization to check its sound operation from third party
viewpoint. ISG framework will make Corporate Auditors,
independent from corporate executives, feel easier to conduct IS
related auditing with clearly defined functions which executives
expected to perform.
4. Conclusion
New ISG model, consists of DIRECT, MONITOR, EVALUATE,
OVERSEE and REPORT, occupies key position in the total ISG
system, and cover the missing functions of corporate IS initiative.
Now we can clearly see the whole picture of ISG, Information
Security Governance system, including existing approaches,
efforts and tasks. Five key functions are clearly defined, and
relationships with existing approaches are specified.
Since every function has been clearly specified, it is easy for
most corporations to check their existing functions and tasks
against new ISG model, and find missing element or interface if
any. It is also useful for most corporations to define their
functions and interfaces of their own ISG, depending on the
physical organizational structure and role and responsibility
sharing, referring this New ISG Model.
It is obvious that new ISG framework and function model
satisfies three key requirements discussed in section 2. ISG
framework has similar functional architecture with ITG, and
relevant to be consistent with other risk management framework.
Each element has designed functionalities to deal with unique
characteristics of information security related risks, and identical
interfaces with the elements of existing ISM mechanisms.
We strongly recommend that this New ISG Model is almost
indispensable for every corporation and organization to coop with
quickly changing world in Information Society. Information
Related Risk is one of the corporations’ key risk areas to be
governed and managed under the sophisticated mechanism.
Remaining studies should be focused on the relationships with
other information security models such as risk metrics, control
activity monitoring and evaluation methodologies.
It is also required to have clearly defined relationships among
existing security related programs, such as ISM benchmarking,
Assurance type IS Audit, ISMS certification scheme, and ISG
framework. We have already started to sort out relationships
among related programs in Japan.
5. Acknowledgements
Authors acknowledge to METI and following committee
members and who contributed to a publication in Japan (“ISG
guidance” [2], 2009).
- Satoru YAMASAKI, PMO, CISO Office, IBM Japan
- Mitsuhiko MARUYAMA, Partner, Deloitte Tohmatsu
Risk Services Co., Ltd.
Authors also acknowledge to Dr. Ikuo MISUMI, Director, Office
of IT security policy, METI, and anonymous contributors who
support for developing the guidance.
6. References
[1] Ministry of Economics, Trade and Industry (METI),
Guidance to Introducing Information Security Governance,
1st July, 2009 (in Japanese)
[2] ISACA/ITGI, Information Security Governance Guidance
for Boards of Directors and Executive Management 2nd
Edition, Mar. 2006
[3] E. Ohki, Framework of Information Security Governance,
Japan Society of Security Management 23rd Annual
conference, 2009 (in Japanese)
[4] K. Ito, T. Kagaya, Kim.K, "Information security governance
to enhance corporate value", Hitotsubashi University Center
for Japanese Business Studies / Working Paper No.91, Jan
[5] Kim,H., "The Effects of Prior Risk Information Disclosure
on Investors' Decision-Making: Using Cases of Revealed
Information Leak Risks.", Hitotsubashi Review of
Commerce and Management vol.2, No.2, Nov 2007
[6] METI, Report of Research Group on Corporate Information
Security Governance (Overview), 2005
[7] METI, Information Security Auditing Guideline Version 2,
2008 (In Japanese)
[8] Information-technology Promotion Agency, Information
Security Management Benchmark (ISM-Benchmark),
ml), 2006
[9] Japan information Security Audit association
(JASA)( (In Japanese)
[10] ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC38500:2008, Corporate governance of
information technology, 2008
[11] ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC27001:2005, Information technology -
Security techniques - Information security management
systems - Requirements, 2005
... Some studies contend that effective countermeasures can be developed to address these problems (Bulgurcu, Cavusoglu, & Benbasat, 2010;Sasse, Brostoff, & Weirich, 2001), and posit that developing and maintaining a culture of information assurance (IA) is essential for managing the human or behavioral aspect associated with data risk (Da Veiga & Eloff, 2007;Dhillon, Syed, & Pedron, 2016;van Niekerk & von Solms, 2010). One aspect of organizational IA culture, sometimes referred to as IA posture, is human compliance with IA policy (Thomson & von Solms, 2005). ...
... Schein (2004) asserts this contention by stating that culture is an abstraction, and that organizations need to understand the forces that result from social and organizational situations, lest they fall victim to them. Other studies have published findings on the effects of a computer security policy on IA culture, and compliance with IA policy (Acuña, 2017;D'Arcy & Hovav, 2007;Da Veiga & Eloff, 2007). Although human behavior is difficult to predict, human intent to perform a specific behavior such as complying with an IA policy can be measured (Ajzen, 1991). ...
Full-text available
Given the growing importance of data stewardship in today’s digital economy, the ability to better manage vulnerabilities associated with electronic data is of interest to organizational leadership. Human error is a vulnerability that increases the likelihood of electronic data risk, such as the threat of a data breach. One countermeasure against human error is the abili to measure human intent toward compliance with ty an information assurance (IA) policy, as one input for better managing the human factor within an organization. While large organizations are likely to have access to resources for managing the human factor, small to mid size organizations are less likel y to have access to similar resources. Thus, this paper explores the use of commonly available research tools to provide a poor man’s countermeasure for better managing the threat/vulnerability pair that is electronic data risk/human error. Our methodolo statistical significance of using ordinal data gy uses logistic regression to evaluate the to measure human intent to comply with an IA policy as such a countermeasure. Our findings conclude that the application of this methodology provides a sound techni que for measuring human error vulnerability, and thus better managing electronic data risk.
... The ISMS is a basis for the systematic build-up and continued control and operation of corporate information asset management procedures and steps to secure confidentiality, integrity, and availability. In order to check corporate safety and reliability, the official review is conducted by independent institutions such as the Korea Internet and Security Agency designated by the Korea Communications Commission based on the certification criteria [9]. ...
... This way, it is possible to improve business stability and secure legal compliance regarding information security for ethical and transparent business management. In addition, ISMS-P-certified organizations can minimize financial losses even in incidents of infringement or class suits [9,13]. ...
Full-text available
Recently, information security incidents such as personal information leakage have been regarded as serious risk factors that directly affect corporate sales reduction and corporate image loss. In order to manage information security systematically, enterprises have been introducing information security systems more than ever before. This study aims to derive major items of the information security system mainly for corporate organizational management, with a focus on the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework, and suggests a direction for system build-up and management. To this end, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was conducted on 20 items derived from previous studies. A survey was conducted among 24 individuals, including 12 corporate internal administrators and 12 corporate external consultants. As a result, it turned out that environmental factors affected the information security system more significantly among technical, organizational, and environmental factors. Notably, 'compliance with legal requirements,' 'protection of information subjects' rights,' and 'increase of the information security awareness' affected the operation of the information security system or related decision-making processes. This finding suggests that although technical and organizational management is also essential when it comes to corporate information security system operation, the system needs to respond swiftly to rapid market changes and legal and administrative changes concerning information security.
... There are several governance frameworks (GFs), sometimes called 'trust frameworks,' such as security GF, IT GF, and SSI GF. Security GF defines guidelines and implements controls used as a reference for governing information security in all facets of the organization's information asset environment [15]. IT GF provides guidelines for clarifying decisions, rights, and accountabilities to encourage desirable behavior redeemed for incentives [16]. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Digital Identity has become a topic that attracts the attention of researchers due to the enormous number of services that have been provided online recently. Researchers face many obstacles regarding the security, privacy, and utility of digital identity. Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) ecosystems provide a solution for digital identity, in addition to providing a decentralized human-centric paradigm that enables users to own and control their identity. Governance framework (GF) is a key challenge in building SSI ecosystems for two reasons. First, the GF needs to address various aspects such as user needs, standards, laws, and business requirements in an ecosystem. Second, the ecosystem consists of diverse, dynamic, and distributed groups of stakeholders. This research work adopts a new trend in developing GF by providing a visual view of the SSI ecosystem. In addition, it seeks to highlight the importance of domain-specific modeling in developing GF. It also addresses lessons learned from a real case study and a modeling journey that supported the creation of a GF. We will discuss the advantages and challenges of modeling and the used modeling tool based on the evaluation from the case feedback and conclude with future work.
... -COBIT provides firms with an opportunity to implement an internal control framework that allows to overcome the COSO's limitations. Veiga and Eloff (2007) Evaluate ISO177995, ISO27001, Capability Maturity Model, Information security Architecture (ISA), Protect), and ISG concept Da Cruz and Labuschagne (2005) mapping between the ITIL Security Management measures against the COBIT DS5 objectives requirements to provide model through the integration of IATF Chapter 8 into ITIL Security Management -to measure the compliance of ITIL with COBIT DS5 -mapping shown addresses the cryptography shortfall found in ITIL Security Management, and IATF PKI has been proven to comply with COBIT DS5 ...
Full-text available
As organizations have become increasingly reliant on information systems, senior managers are keen in assessing the progress of implemented information security strategies. Although the balanced scorecard approach has been suggested for security governance, a critical issue affecting information security practitioners is complexity, as there are many standards and frameworks, with duplication and overlaps to adhere to when organizing the data. Consequently, the article attempts to develop a more inclusive framework for information security governance, a research gap recently identified in the literature. The article maps five governance and control frameworks (COBIT, SABSA, ISG, ITIL, and ISO 27000) to the information security balanced scorecard (InfoSec BSC) to develop a conceptual design of an effective information security performance measurement tool that can be used by senior managers. Using a real-life case application and interviews with a panel of experts, the article identifies IS initiatives, performance measures for each of the mapped objectives derived from governance and control frameworks that may provide guidance for practitioners.
... The purpose of information security management is to implement appropriate countermeasures in order to minimise the impact that security-related threats and vulnerabilities might have on an organisation. Several researchers have examined the changing role of information security management within organisations in the past few decades [64][65][66][67]. Von Solms' analysis separated the evolution of information security management within organisations into three 'waves' [66]. ...
Full-text available
Security incidents detected by information technology-dependent organisations are escalat- ing in both scale and complexity. As a result, security incident response has become a critical mechanism for organisations in an effort to minimise the damage from security incidents. To help organisations develop security incident response capabilities, several security incident response approaches and best practice guidelines have been published in both industry and academia. The final phase within many of these approaches and best practices is the ‘feed- back’ or ‘follow-up’ phase. Within this phase, it is expected that an organisation will learn from a security incident and use this information to improve its overall information secu- rity posture. However, researchers have argued that many organisations tend to focus on eradication and recovery instead of learning from a security incident. An exploratory case study was undertaken in a Fortune 500 Organisation to investigate se- curity incident learning in practice within organisations. At a high-level, the challenges and problems identified from the case study suggests that security incident response could ben- efit from improving the quality of data generated from and during security investigations. Therefore, the objective of this research was to improve the quality of data in security inci- dent response, so that organisations can develop deeper insights into security incident causes and to assist with security incident learning. A supplementary challenge identified was the need to minimise the time-cost associated with any changes to organisational processes. Therefore, several lightweight measures were created and implemented within the case study organisation. These measures were evaluated in a series of longitudinal studies that collected both quantitative and qualitative data from the case study organisation.
Purpose Boards of Directors and other organisational leaders make decisions about the information security governance systems to implement in their companies. The increasing number of cyber-breaches targeting businesses makes this activity inescapable. Recently, researchers have published comprehensive lists of recommended cyber measures, specifically to inform organisational boards. However, the young cybersecurity industry has still to confirm and refine these guidelines. As a starting point, it would be helpful for organisational leaders to know what other organisations are doing in terms of using these guidelines. In an ideal world, bespoke surveys would be developed to gauge adherence to guidelines, but this is not always feasible. What we often do have is data from existing cybersecurity surveys. The authors argue that such data could be repurposed to quantify adherence to existing information security guidelines, and this paper aims to propose, and test, an original methodology to do so. Design/methodology/approach The authors propose a quantification mechanism to measure the degree of adherence to a set of published information security governance recommendations and guidelines targeted at organisational leaders. The authors test their quantification mechanism using a data set collected in a survey of 156 Italian companies on information security and privacy. Findings The evaluation of the proposed mechanism appears to align with findings in the literature, indicating the validity of the present approach. An analysis of how different industries rank in terms of their adherence to the selected set of recommendations and guidelines confirms the usability of our repurposed data set to measure adherence. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, a quantification mechanism as the one proposed in this study has never been proposed, and tested, in the literature. It suggests a way to repurpose survey data to determine the extent to which companies are implementing measures recommended by published cybersecurity guidelines. This way, the proposed mechanism responds to increasing calls for the adoption of research practices that minimise waste of resources and enhance research sustainability.
Cover Page
Full-text available
This is the print version of the International Journal of Library and Information Services (IJLIS) for Volume 10, Issue 2 during July-December 2021.
The study looks at security challenges, causes and effects of security challenges on the resources, types of collection that are more vulnerable to security breaches, challenges encountered in combating the breaches, measures to reduce & address security breaches in Fed. Uni. Lafia library (6) objectives with research questions guided the study. The study uses survey research design. The population examined is (30) library staff & (100) undergraduate students in Fed. Uni. Lafia, summing total population to (130). Data was collected using a questionnaire titled effect of security challenges on library resources in federal University of Lafia library. Random sampling technique was used for the study. Mean tables, frequencies and percentage were used to analysed data. It shows, library is faced with the challenges of book theft, non-return of materials, mutilation, overdue books, shelving of books. Recommendations; To increased security in the library by supervision, patrolling/surveillance, buy copiers, installed security gadgets in the library premises & fencing.
Full-text available
El uso masivo de las Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicaciones ha ocasionado la interdependencia de la sociedad respecto de estas; sumado a la ausencia de controles eficientes y efectivos a nivel general, incrementan la exposición a los ataques o amenazas informáticas, a las vulnerabilidades en los activos de información de las organizaciones. En este contexto, el presente artículo propone una arquitectura de análisis de datos a través de herramientas de Big Data mediante la utilización de eventos o registros de seguridad, que permitan mejorar la identificación, integración y correlación de eventos. La metodología de la investigación soportada se caracterizó por ser exploratoria y descriptiva. Para el desarrollo de la solución propuesta se empleó las fases del procesamiento de Big Data propuesta por Labrinidis y Jagadish, que permita la identificación de amenazas de informáticas. La arquitectura tecnológica diseñada se basó en la integración de Elastic Stack y sus componentes principales (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana), y tecnologías como Filebeat y Wazuh Security Detection (NIPS/HIDS), gestionando la seguridad en activos de información como equipos de comunicaciones, servidores de datos y aplicaciones, motores de bases de datos, y terminales de usuario final. Su implementación permitiría la supervisión en tiempo real e histórica de una respuesta ágil y efectiva de alertas de seguridad e informes de estado ante incidentes.
Full-text available
Information technology companies have grown in size and recognized the need to protect their valuable assets. As a result, each IT application has its authentication mechanism, and an employee needs a username and password. As the number of applications increased, as a result, it became increasingly complex to manage all identities like the number of usernames and passwords of an employee. All identities had to be retrieved by users. Both the identities and the access rights associated with those identities had to be protected by an administrator. Management couldn't even capture such access rights because they couldn't verify things like privacy and security. Identity management can help solve this problem. The concept behind identity management is to centralize identity management and manage access identity centrally rather than multiple applications with their authentication and authorization mechanisms. In this research work, we develop governance and an identity management framework for information and technology infrastructures with privileged access management, consisting of cybersecurity policies and strategies. The results show the efficiency of the framework compared to the existing information security components. The integrated identity and access management and privileged access management enable organizations to respond to incidents and facilitate compliance. It can automate use cases that manage privileged accounts in the real world.
Full-text available
The study, representing 6,528 employees, investigates the relationship of the “big five” personality dimensions and managerial practices to the dimension of trust relationships between managers and employees, and also the relationship between the “big five” and managerial practices. Results indicate that managerial practices have an influence on the trust relationships between managers and employees. A weaker relationship with the dimension of trust was obtained for the “big five” personality dimensions. Although there appears to be a weaker relationship between the “big five” and the dimension of trust, the relatively good fit of the model indicates that an overall implication of the model is that both managerial practices and the “big five” personality aspects of the manager might influence his/her subordinates indirectly. The results indicate that although managers perceived it to be a good instrument to use, future research is needed to expand other anecdotes of trust.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
In every organisation an information security culture emerges from the way in which people behave towards information and the security thereof. The procedures that employees use in their daily work could represent the weakest link in the information security chain. It is therefore importanr to develop and improve information security culture through a structured model that addresses employees behaviour. This article will discuss the concept of information security culture and a assessment approach developed to implement and improve such a culture.
The importance of ethical aspects and human considerations in the implementation of information security is discussed. Management of various levels are essential for a secure information technology (IT) environment. The levels include protection of electronic commerce; and adherence to technical services and laws. Security policies and procedures are also necessary to protect privacy, property and obligations of organizations.
The opportunities and risks that significant IT investments present, most definitely call for board-level participation. Corporate governance laws and regulations hold boards accountable for company operation, which affects economic performance. Therefore, board members should take well-informed decisions regarding IT strategy. But the board cannot be expected to be up to speed on IT issues. The answer to this could be the establishment of a board-level IT oversight committee, which could communicate IT to the board. IT governance is rapidly becoming an essential part of corporate governance. It appears that corporate boards seem to be making ill-advised decisions in terms of IT and are therefore having difficulty implementing good systems of IT governance. In addition an IT oversight committee would facilitate the board in achieving better legal and egulatory compliance. This paper discusses the need for greater board level participation in the way an organization is directed and controlled, with specific interest in IT related issues. IT has become widely integrated into most organizations but IT issues remain a neglected topic at board level. The general failure by the board to effectively strategically direct and control IT is derived from a lack of adequate skills and insight into IT related issues at board level. Therefore this paper motivates the institution of an IT oversight committee to help advise the board in terms of IT governance and other strategic IT-related issues, and thereby bring about a stronger system internal control and an enhanced approach to corporate governance.
Information technology (IT) has become part and parcel of the business world today. In fact, it will continue to become an even larger factor in the future. Organizations will interlink their IT systems as a result of linking to the Internet, electronic data interchange (EDI), electronic funds transfer at point of sale (EFTPoS), etc. All of this might hold an information security risk for an organization. Organizations attempt to secure their own IT environment, but they have little control over the IT systems they link with. If those external IT environments are insecure, they might pose a threat to the IT systems in the host environment. Organizations would like to obtain some proof that the IT systems of their business partners are secure before they link with their individual systems. Such a proof can only be given through some security evaluation and certification process. Shows and explains the need for such a process.
Information technology -Security techniques -Information security management systems -Requirements
  • Iso Iec
  • Iso
  • Iec
ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC27001:2005, Information technology -Security techniques -Information security management systems -Requirements, 2005
Corporate governance of information technology
  • Iso Iec
  • Iso
  • Iec
ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC38500:2008, Corporate governance of information technology, 2008
The Effects of Prior Risk Information Disclosure on Investors' Decision-Making: Using Cases of Revealed Information Leak Risks
  • H Kim
Kim,H., "The Effects of Prior Risk Information Disclosure on Investors' Decision-Making: Using Cases of Revealed Information Leak Risks.", Hitotsubashi Review of Commerce and Management vol.2, No.2, Nov 2007
Information Security Governance Guidance for Boards of Directors and Executive Management 2nd Edition
  • Isaca Itgi
ISACA/ITGI, Information Security Governance Guidance for Boards of Directors and Executive Management 2nd Edition, Mar. 2006