Content uploaded by Lars Ruthotto
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Lars Ruthotto
Content may be subject to copyright.
A Simplified Pipeline for Motion Correction in
Dual Gated Cardiac PET
Lars Ruthotto1, Fabian Gigengack2,3, Martin Burger4, Carsten H. Wolters5,
Xiaoyi Jiang3, Klaus P. Sch¨
afers2and Jan Modersitzki1
1Institute of Mathematics and Image Computing, University of L¨
ubeck
2European Insitute for Molecular Imaging, University of M¨
unster
3Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of M¨
unster
4Institute for Computational and Applied Mathematics, University of M¨
unster
5Institute of Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of M¨
unster
lars.ruthotto@mic.uni-luebeck.de
Abstract. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a nuclear imaging
technique of increasing importance e.g. in cardiovascular investigations.
However, cardiac and respiratory motion of the patient degrade the image
quality due to acquisition times in the order of minutes. Reconstructions
without motion compensation are prone to spatial blurring and affected
attenuation correction. These effects can be reduced by gating, motion
correction and finally summation of the transformed images.
This paper describes a new and systematic approach for the correction
of both cardiac and respiratory motion. Key contribution is the splitting
of the motion into respiratory and cardiac components, which are then
corrected individually. For the considered gating scheme the number of
registration problems is reduced by a factor of 3, which considerably sim-
plifies the motion correction pipeline compared to previous approaches.
The subproblems are stabilized by averaging cardiac gates for respiratory
motion estimation and vice versa. The potential of the novel pipeline is
evaluated in a group study on data of 21 human patients.
1 Introduction
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a nuclear imaging technique that pro-
vides insight into functional processes in the body. Its fields of applications range
from oncology via neuroimaging to cardiology. Due to acquisition times in the
order of minutes, motion is a well-known problem in PET. In thoracic PET two
different types of motion degrade the image quality: respiratory and cardiac mo-
tion. Neglecting the resulting spatial mislocalization of emission events during
the reconstruction leads to blurred images and affects attenuation correction.
Gating, i.e. grouping the entire list of emission events by breathing and/or
cardiac phases reduces the extent of motion contained in each single gate [1,2]. A
downside is the higher noise level in each gate since only a small fraction of the
available events is considered. This is a severe problem in dual gating schemes,
which demand a very fine division into both respiratory and cardiac gates.
2 Ruthotto et al.
Different strategies for motion correction were proposed in the literature and
for a detailed overview see [3]. This paper follows the idea of first eliminating
the motion in the dual gated data by image registration and finally summation
of the gated images to consider all measured emission events and thereby lower
the noise level. This strategy has proven successful for respiratory motion cor-
rection [4,5] and cardiac motion correction [6]. Recently, both types of motion
were eliminated after dual gating using nonlinear mass-preserving registration
[7]. Mass-preservation is a key idea in order to cope with intensity modulations
owing to partial volume effects. Another key contribution is the discretization of
a hyperelastic regularization energy [8]. This sophisticated regularizer is manda-
tory as it achieves meaningful motion estimates and guarantees diffeomorphic
transformations even for data with high noise level and large deformations. The
algorithm was embedded into the registration toolbox FAIR that is freely avail-
able at http://www.siam.org/books/fa06/ and documented in [9].
However, the scheme in [7] is computationally very expensive since all gated
images are treated individually. This yields a total number of m·n−1 challenging
registration problems for a gating into mcardiac and nrespiratory gates.
In this paper the nature of the gating scheme is exploited to provide a system-
atic approach to motion correction and to simplify the registration pipeline. The
motion between a template gate and the reference gate is modeled as a simple
concatenation of a respiratory and a cardiac transformation under the assump-
tion that cardiac and respiratory motion are approximately independent. This
scheme reduces the number of registration tasks to m+n−2 and thus saves com-
putation times which allows finer gating schemes. In the considered 5 ×5 gating
this yields a reduction from 24 to 8 registration subproblems. Furthermore each
sub-problem is stabilized by averaging over cardiac phases in the respiratory
motion estimation and vice versa. Results for a group of 21 patients indicate the
effectiveness of the simplified approach and its positive impact on image quality.
2 Materials and Methods
2.1 Data acquisition
Data of 21 patients (19 male, 2 female; 37-76 years old) with known coronary
artery disease was acquired in a 20 minute list mode scan on a Siemens Biograph
Sensation 16 PET/CT scanner. The data was cropped to the first three minutes
to resemble a clinically feasible protocol and dual gating into 5 respiratory and 5
cardiac gates was performed, [2]. The 3D EM software EMrecon was used for
reconstruction of all data see [10]. The images are sampled with 128 ×100 ×44.
2.2 Mass-preserving hyperelastic registration
A key contribution in [7] is the incorporation of the mass-preserving property of
PET into motion correction. The idea is that the total amount of intensity of the
template image Tshould remain unchanged after registration to the reference R,
Motion correction of dual gated PET 3
which is not guaranteed for standard registration approaches. This is realized by
an intensity modulation accounting for volumetric changes given by the Jacobian
determinant of the transformation [7]. The natural distance term for density
images is the sum of squared differences yielding the image registration functional
J[y] := 1
2k(T ◦ y)·det(∇y)− Rk2+Shyper(y)
where Shyper is the hyperelastic energy [8], which was recently integrated into
FAIR: Shyper(y) = αlSlength(y) + αaSarea (y) + αvSvolume(y). It controls the
changes in length, area and volume induced by the transformation y. Since in-
finite energy is required to annihilate or enlarge a volume Shyper guarantees
the invertibility of the transformation even for large displacements and noisy
data. While this regularizer is a desirable feature in many registration tasks, it
is mandatory in this application to guarantee the preservation of mass.
2.3 Simplified registration pipeline
The used gating protocol provides 25 images denoted by Ir
cwhich are related to
5 respiratory phases r= 1, ..., 5 and 5 cardiac phases c= 1, ..., 5. The assump-
tion is that for each fixed respiratory phase rgeometric differences in Ir
1, ..., Ir
5
are only due to cardiac motion. Hence, all these cardiac phases are displaced by
the same respiratory motion yr. Respiratory motion is eliminated first from the
gated dataset as this motion shows less nonlinearities. To this end, cardiac av-
erages I1,...,I5are computed, where Ir= (P5
c=1 Ir
c)/5, and used to estimate
the respiratory displacements y1, . . . , y5based on the above mass-preserving hy-
perelastic registration. Next, respiratory motion is compensated in all 25 images.
Subsequently, I1,...,I5are computed, where Icis the average of the trans-
formed respiratory gates. These images are then used to estimate the cardiac
displacements y1, ..., y5. Note that even after removing the respiratory motion
each such gate relates to different realization of (stochastic) radioactive decay.
Hence averaging reduces the noise level even for perfect spatial alignment.
After these 4 respiratory and 4 cardiac motion estimations both types of
motion are eliminated from all 25 images. To this end yrand ycare concatenated
and the mass-preserving transformation model is applied. Finally, the motion
compensated image is obtained by summation over all gates.
3 Results
The proposed motion correction scheme is applied to the image data of 21
human patients. To minimize the geometric mismatch the mid-expiration dias-
tole gate is chosen as reference image denoted by IRef. The images are cropped
to a rectangular region of 128 ×100 ×44 voxels around the torso. Regularization
parameters are set to αl= 5, αa= 1 for length and area term as in [7]. Control
of volumetric change is tightened for respiratory by choosing αv= 100 and kept
4 Ruthotto et al.
4 Ruthotto et al.
IRef ITem and yinitial di↵erence final di↵erence
Fig. 1. Results of the 3D registration for an arbitrary chosen patient out of the 21 pa-
tients. Three orthogonal cross-sections sharing the point marked by a white crosshair
are shown. A visualization of the mid-expiration diastolic gate IRef (first col.) is com-
pared to the furthest apart end-expiratory systolic gate ITem that is visualized with
superimposed deformation y(second col.) in a small region around the heart. The
decline in absolute di↵erence (third and fourth col.) images and the increase of normal-
ized cross correlation from 0.522 to 0.681 before and after nonlinear mass-preserving
registration show the positive impact of the proposed method on image similarity.
performed on a coarse-to-fine hierarchy of levels and stopped at the second finest
discretization level (64 ⇥50 ⇥22) to improve stability against noise and speed
the correction up. The total computation time is about 8 minutes per patient
on a Linux PC with a 6 core Intel Xeon X5670@2,93 GHz using Matlab 2010b.
The volumetric change induced by the transformations serves as an indicator
to validate the injectivity of the transformation. The minimum and maximum
of the Jacobian determinant over all patients and all transformations is between
0.81 and 1.19 for respiratory and 0.55 and 1.31 for cardiac motions. Thus all
transformations including their concatenations are di↵eomorphic.
Exemplarily, the registration result is illustrated for an arbitrary chosen pa-
tient in Fig.1 using three orthogonal slice views. Presentation is restricted to the
most challenging sub-problem of registration between the end-expiration systolic
single gate no motion correction proposed motion correction
Fig. 2. Reconstruction results for an arbitrary chosen patient out of the group of 21
patients. Coronal views of the mid-expiration diastolic gate IRef (left, minimal mo-
tion blur, high noise level), reconstruction without motion correction (center, motion
blurred, acceptable noise level) and the result using the novel motion correction scheme
(right, considerably reduced motion, acceptable noise level) are visualized.
Fig. 1. Results of the 3D registration for an arbitrary chosen patient out of the 21 pa-
tients. Three orthogonal cross-sections sharing the point marked by a white crosshair
are shown. A visualization of the mid-expiration diastolic gate IRef (first col.) is com-
pared to the furthest apart end-expiratory systolic gate ITem that is visualized with
superimposed deformation y(second col.) in a small region around the heart. The
decline in absolute difference (third and fourth col.) images and the increase of normal-
ized cross correlation from 0.522 to 0.681 before and after nonlinear mass-preserving
registration show the positive impact of the proposed method on image similarity.
at the same level, αv= 10, for cardiac motion correction. Registration is per-
formed on a coarse-to-fine hierarchy of levels and stopped at the second finest
discretization level (64 ×50 ×22) to improve stability against noise and speed
the correction up. The total computation time is about 8 minutes per patient
on a Linux PC with a 6 core Intel Xeon X5670@2,93 GHz using Matlab 2010b.
The volumetric change induced by the transformations serves as an indicator
to validate the injectivity of the transformation. The minimum and maximum
of the Jacobian determinant over all patients and all transformations is between
0.81 and 1.19 for respiratory and 0.55 and 1.31 for cardiac motions. Thus all
transformations including their concatenations are diffeomorphic.
Exemplarily, the registration result is illustrated for an arbitrary chosen pa-
tient in Fig.1 using three orthogonal slice views. Presentation is restricted to the
4 Ruthotto et al.
IRef ITem and yinitial di↵erence final di↵erence
Fig. 1. Results of the 3D registration for an arbitrary chosen patient out of the 21 pa-
tients. Three orthogonal cross-sections sharing the point marked by a white crosshair
are shown. A visualization of the mid-expiration diastolic gate IRef (first col.) is com-
pared to the furthest apart end-expiratory systolic gate ITem that is visualized with
superimposed deformation y(second col.) in a small region around the heart. The
decline in absolute di↵erence (third and fourth col.) images and the increase of normal-
ized cross correlation from 0.522 to 0.681 before and after nonlinear mass-preserving
registration show the positive impact of the proposed method on image similarity.
performed on a coarse-to-fine hierarchy of levels and stopped at the second finest
discretization level (64 ⇥50 ⇥22) to improve stability against noise and speed
the correction up. The total computation time is about 8 minutes per patient
on a Linux PC with a 6 core Intel Xeon X5670@2,93 GHz using Matlab 2010b.
The volumetric change induced by the transformations serves as an indicator
to validate the injectivity of the transformation. The minimum and maximum
of the Jacobian determinant over all patients and all transformations is between
0.81 and 1.19 for respiratory and 0.55 and 1.31 for cardiac motions. Thus all
transformations including their concatenations are di↵eomorphic.
Exemplarily, the registration result is illustrated for an arbitrary chosen pa-
tient in Fig.1 using three orthogonal slice views. Presentation is restricted to the
most challenging sub-problem of registration between the end-expiration systolic
single gate no motion correction proposed motion correction
Fig. 2. Reconstruction results for an arbitrary chosen patient out of the group of 21
patients. Coronal views of the mid-expiration diastolic gate IRef (left, minimal mo-
tion blur, high noise level), reconstruction without motion correction (center, motion
blurred, acceptable noise level) and the result using the novel motion correction scheme
(right, considerably reduced motion, acceptable noise level) are visualized.
Fig. 2. Reconstruction results for an arbitrary chosen patient out of the group of 21
patients. Coronal views of the mid-expiration diastolic gate IRef (left, minimal mo-
tion blur, high noise level), reconstruction without motion correction (center, motion
blurred, acceptable noise level) and the result using the novel motion correction scheme
(right, considerably reduced motion, acceptable noise level) are visualized.
Motion correction of dual gated PET 5
Motion correction of dual gated PET 5
cardiac 1 cardiac 2 cardiac 3 cardiac 4 cardiac 5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Normalized Cross Correlation
Fig. 3. Motion correction results for our group study of 21 patients. Normalized cross-
correlations between the 24 template gates and the reference gate are shown before
(gray) and after (black) motion correction in a box plot. The considerable increase of
NCC shows the e↵ectiveness and robustness of the new method.
0.81 and 1.19 for respiratory and 0.55 and 1.31 for cardiac motions. Thus all
transformations including their concatenations are di↵eomorphic.
Exemplarily, the registration result is illustrated for an arbitrary chosen pa-
tient in Fig.1 using three orthogonal slice views. Presentation is restricted to the
most challenging sub-problem of registration between the end-expiration systolic
gate and the mid-expiration diastolic reference gate. The di↵erence images before
and after registration clearly show the considerably improved image similarity.
Furthermore the transformation y5
2- obtained by concatenating the respiratory
motion y5and the cardiac component y2is smooth and regular.
The positive impact of the new strategy on image quality is illustrated for
the same dataset in Fig. 2 in a coronal view. The e↵ect of gating - minimal
motion blur, but high noise level - is visible in the reference gate (left). The not
motion-corrected reconstruction (center) shows acceptable noise level, but the
hearts contour is motion-blurred. Both advantages - minimal motion blur and
acceptable noise level - are combined by the resulting image of the new method.
The improvement of image similarity after motion correction is presented in
Fig. 3 for the whole group of 21 patients. Normalized cross-correlations (NCC)
between MathcalIRef and the 24 template gates computed in a rectangular re-
gion around the heart for all patients are illustrated in a box plot. A considerable
increase of NCC can be seen by comparing the gray (before registration) and
black (after registration) boxes and whiskers.
4 Discussion
This paper presents an systematic approach to cardiac and respiratory motion
correction in dual gated thoracic PET. The main contribution is the simplifica-
tion of the processing pipeline achieved by a splitting of the displacement into a
respiration and cardiology component and individually correction of both e↵ects
in the dual gated dataset. A considerably lower number of registration problems
Fig. 3. Motion correction results for our group study of 21 patients. Normalized cross-
correlations between the 24 template gates and the reference gate are shown before
(gray) and after (black) motion correction in a box plot. The considerable increase of
NCC shows the effectiveness and robustness of the new method.
most challenging sub-problem of registration between the end-expiration systolic
gate and the mid-expiration diastolic reference gate. The difference images before
and after registration clearly show the considerably improved image similarity.
Furthermore the transformation y5
2- obtained by concatenating the respiratory
motion y5and the cardiac component y2is smooth and regular.
The positive impact of the new strategy on image quality is illustrated for
the same dataset in Fig. 2 in a coronal view. The effect of gating - minimal
motion blur, but high noise level - is visible in the reference gate (left). The not
motion-corrected reconstruction (center) shows acceptable noise level, but the
hearts contour is motion-blurred. Both advantages - minimal motion blur and
acceptable noise level - are combined by the resulting image of the new method.
The improvement of image similarity after motion correction is presented in
Fig. 3 for the whole group of 21 patients. Normalized cross-correlations (NCC)
between IRef and the 24 template gates computed in a rectangular region around
the heart for all patients are illustrated in a box plot. A considerable increase of
NCC can be seen by comparing the gray (before registration) and black (after
registration) boxes and whiskers.
4 Discussion
This paper presents an systematic approach to cardiac and respiratory motion
correction in dual gated thoracic PET. The main contribution is the simplifica-
tion of the processing pipeline achieved by a splitting of the displacement into a
respiration and cardiology component and individually correction of both effects
in the dual gated dataset. A considerably lower number of registration problems
need to be solved, which are stabilized by averaging cardiac gates for respira-
tory correction and vice versa. The correction results for a group of 21 patients
suggest that the underlying assumption that cardiac and respiratory motion are
independent is approximately fulfilled for our data.
6 Ruthotto et al.
The presented pipeline is in principle compatible with existing approaches to
cardiac and respiratory motion correction techniques [6,4,5,7]. Here, a nonlinear
mass-preserving approach is chosen as it is well-suited for the registration of
density images such as PET, [7]. The preservation of mass can be ensured under
certain assumptions including the invertibility of the transformation. Therefore
an implementation of a hyperelastic regularizer [8], which is integrated in the
freely available toolbox FAIR [9], is used. This regularizer guarantees diffeomor-
phic solutions of the problem, but still allows large and flexible transformations.
Individual treatment of respiratory and cardiac motion seems reasonable as
both types of motion are very different in nature. While the further is almost
locally rigid, the hearts contraction tends to be more flexible. In the proposed
pipeline this can be addressed by e.g. the choice of different regularization pa-
rameters for both types as done in this work. This enforces a smaller range of
the volumetric changes due to respiratory motion for our data.
Despite the considerably reduced distance, the heart structure is still visible
in the final difference images, see Fig.1. The registration could be improved
by performing a number of outer loops over respiratory and cardiac motion
correction to be investigated in future work.
The very promising results presented in this paper mark a next step towards
clinical applicability of motion correction methods in thoracic PET. With the
simplified registration pipeline the quality of motion correction can be further
improved as finer subdivision schemes become feasible.
5 Acknowledgements
The authors thank Otmar Schober from the Department of Nuclear Medicine at
the University of M¨
unster for providing the interesting data.
References
1. Lucignani G. Respiratory and cardiac motion correction with 4D PET imaging:
Shooting at moving targets. Eur J Nucl Med Mol I. 2009;.
2. B¨
uther F, Dawood M, Stegger L et al. List Mode-Driven Cardiac and Respiratory
Gating in PET. J Nucl Med. 2009;.
3. Bai W, Brady M. Motion Correction and Attenuation Correction for Respiratory
Gated PET Images. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 2011;.
4. Dawood M, B¨
uther F, Jiang X, Sch¨
afers KP. Respiratory motion correction in 3-D
PET data with advanced optical flow algorithms. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 2008;.
5. Bai W, Brady M. Respiratory motion correction in PET images. Phys Med Biol.
2009;.
6. Klein JK, Huesman RH. Four dimensional processing of deformable cardiacd PET
data. Med Image Anal. 2002;.
7. Gigengack F, Ruthotto L, Burger M et al . Motion correction in dual gated cardiac
PET using mass-preserving image registration. IEEE Trans Med Img. 2011;.
8. Burger M, Modersitzki J, Ruthotto L. A hyperelastic regularization energy for
image registration. submitted to SIAM SISC. 2011;.
Motion correction of dual gated PET 7
9. Modersitzki J. FAIR: Flexible Algorithms for Image Registration. SIAM; 2009.
10. K¨
osters T, Sch¨
afers KP, W¨
ubbeling F. EMrecon: An expectation maximization
based image reconstruction framework for emission tomography data; 2011. .