ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

It is suggested that characters which develop through mate preference confer handicaps on the selected individuals in their survival. These handicaps are of use to the selecting sex since they test the quality of the mate. The size of characters selected in this way serve as marks of quality. The understanding that a handicap, which tests for quality, can evolve as a consequence of its advantage to the individual, may provide an explanation for many puzzling evolutionary problems. Such an interpretation may provide an alternative to other hypotheses which assumed complicated selective mechanisms, such as group selection or kin selection, which do not act directly on the individual.
Content may be subject to copyright.
J. theor. Biol. (1975) 53, 205-214
Mate Selection-A Selection for a Handicap
Institute for Nature Conservation Research, Faculty of Life Sciences,
The George S. Wise Centre for Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
(Received 23 July 1974, and in revisedform 2 December 1974)
It is suggested that characters which develop through mate preference
confer handicaps on the selected individuals in their survival. These
handicaps are of use to the selecting sex since they test the quality of the
mate. The size of characters selected in this way serve as marks of quality.
The understanding that a handicap, which tests for quality, can evolve
as a consequence of its advantage to the individual, may provide an
explanation for many puzzling evolutionary problems. Such an inter-
pretation may provide an alternative to other hypotheses which assumed
complicated selective mechanisms, such as group selection or kin selection,
which do not act directly on the individual.
In his theory of sexual selection, Darwin (1874) tried to explain the evolution
of characters such as the antlers of deer, the tail plumes of the peacock, the
brilliant colouration of many birds and their fantastic displays and songs,
by the cumulative effect of females preference for certain male types. He
suggested that the disadvantages to male survival induced by such characters,
are compensated for by more or better females preferring that individual to
other males. But Darwin could not satisfactorily explain why females should
prefer certain males. He just assumed that they prefer certain male types
to others.
The theory of sexual selection aroused and still arouses much debate.
There is a basic difficulty to be explained. On the one hand, it is a common
observation that the most beautiful males of a bird species, or the deer
with the largest antlers, are preferred by females, and, on the other hand,
there is no simple explanation to suggest in what ways the preferred males
should be of better quality than others. Wallace (1889), therefore, dismissed
altogether the theory of sexual selection by mate preference while others,
like Poulton (1890), defended it.
Fisher (1930) suggested that initially there was a correlation between the
character preferred by the female and the quality of the male. This correlation
when appreciated by discriminating females can account for the initial
attractiveness of the male. Once sexual selection begins to have its effect,
it generates a rapid chain of events in which the preference itself creates a
selective pressure which accounts for the exaggerated development of the
character and its additional attractiveness. Fisher suggested that (at the
end of the process) males with the exaggerated sexually selected characters
are more attractive to females not necessarily because they are better now
than they were earlier but because they and their sons are more attractive to
females. In Fisher’s words “an additional advantage is conferred by the
female’s preference. The intensity of the second preference will itself be
increased by selection so long as the sons of females excercising the pre-
ference most decidedly have any advantage over sons of other females
whether this is due to the first or the second cause” (my own italics).
Fisher’s argument that males bearing ornaments which might handicap
them are attractive because their sons have a greater chance to be attractive,
contrasts with his own statement that “tastes of organisms like other organs
and faculties must be regarded as the products of evolutionary change
governed by the relative advantage which such tastes may confer”.
O’Donald’s model (1962), in line with Fisher’s argument, assumed that
females evaluate males through a single character. It is obvious that with only
one measurement at hand an exaggeration of the character, beyond its
significance as an indicator for quality, will be undetected by females. But
under most circumstances females probably select males by more than one
character. In fact males advertise to females by voice, colour, movement
and form, etc. An exaggeration of only one of these characters, without
correlation to the quality of the males, should loose its effect by a negative
selection. Any female which continues to prefer such a character will end
up with a worse mate than females which choose males by all other characters
except the exaggerated one. Generally it should be assumed that a character
in a male is attractive to a female because it helps the female to select the
better male.
Maynard Smith (1958) already remarked that “sexual selection will have
evolutionary consequences only if those individuals which have character-
istics which make them successful, in the competitions for a mate, are also
fitter than the average as parents”. Williams (1966) compared the process
of mate selection to an “evolutionary battle of the sexes” which “fosters a
skilled salesmanship among the males and an equally well-developed sales
resistance in the females”.
It is difficult to see how Maynard Smith and Williams could agree with
Fisher, that a state of comparative stability may be reached, when the
attractiveness of males may be the main reason why they are preferred
(Fisher’s second cause).
I suggest that sexual selection is effective because it improves the ability
of the selecting sex to detect quality in the selected sex. The selecting sex
benefits because it can be assured of the quality of its mate, while the selected
sex benefits because it can better advertise its quality and thus probably
acquires more or a better mate. But both sexes also lose. Males lose by invest-
ing (time, energy, risks, etc.) in advertising. Females may receive less help
from their mates and bear sons which are less fit to stand the pressure of
natural selection (since they are also of the genotype which invests more in
attracting females).
A survey of a variety of characters which were probably selected by sexual
selection (through mate preference) makes it clear that probably all of them
seem to confer a handicap on survival. The handicap inherent in the effects
of mate preference could also be assumed as a logical conclusion. Before
mate selection achieved its evolutionary effect the organism was in equili-
brium with the pressures of natural selection. If the selective pressure of
mate preference, which has no value to the survival of the individual, is
added to the variety of selective pressures the effect must be negative. The
larger the effect of the preference the more developed the character and the
larger the handicap imposed. Hence a character affected by sexual selection
should be correlated to the handicap it imposes on the individual. The anta-
gonism which exist between the process of natural selection and sexual
selection has already been mentioned by Darwin and Fisher. But they saw the
antagonism as a by-product of the mechanism. My interpretation of sexual
selection implies that sexual selection is effective only by selecting a character
which lowers the survival of the individual. [An argument along this line
was given by Emlen (1973) among several other arguments.] It is possible
to consider the handicap as a kind of a test imposed on the individual. An
individual with a well developed sexually selected character, is an individual
which has survived a test. A female which could discriminate a male possess-
ing a sexually selected character, from one without it, can discriminate
between a male which has passed a test and one which has not been tested.
The more developed the character the more severe was the test. Females
which select males with the most developed characters can be sure that they
have selected from among the best genotypes of the male population
(Fig. 1).
An individual with a very good genotype but without a handicap is
certainly fitter than a handicapped individual which otherwise possesses
the same genotype. But since an individual without the handicapping marker
does not advertise its quality, a potential mate cannot spot it. Females
which choose by a sexually selected character compromise. They select a
good quality male which is handicapped but they can be assured as to
Magnitude of sexually selected character
FIG. 1.
The effects of mate preference on the evolution of a sexually attractive character.
Quality in the mate is plotted on the vertical axis while the size of the attractive character
(which is considered to be a handicap) is plotted on the horizontal axis. At the intersection
of the axes the character is of the size which fits best the selection pressure of natural
selection. An increase in the character (hence in the handicap) eliminate low quality
individuals (lower hatched area in the diagram). The selecting sex cannot distinguish
quality among potential mates with equally developed attractive character. Note that the
more developed the attractive character the higher the average quality of a potential mate.
their mate’s quality. Sexual selection proceeds in producing an effect, as
long as females benefit more from the assurance of the quality of their
than they lose by mating with a handicapped
and as long as the males
can survive the handicap. It is obvious
males which do
invest in
parental care can spend more in order to pass the test of quality (Trivers,
1972; Selander, 1972).
In my model of sexual selection there is no need to assume any special
genetic linkage between the marker of quality and the quality of the individual.
Since whenever the marker is present in a phenotype, the handicap it has
already imposed is a proof that the phenotype and hence very likely also the
genotype is above a certain level of quality marked in the model by the
lower curve.
Since any genetic linkage between a marker and quality is open to a
change and hence to a bluff (i.e. low quality individuals may be tagged by
high quality marker) the test of the handicap is a simple way to exclude
The effects of sexual selection should vary, as suggested already by Darwin,
and have to be “compatible with the existence of the species”. Hence some
species and often one of the sexes (which invest more in parental care) cannot
be easily pushed into a handicap since the pressures of natural selection
are too tight. In these cases mate selection might be achieved either through
an easier test, with a smaller handicap, or without any at all. In the last case
a mate may be selected but “sexual selection” cannot operate. Under such
circumstances mate selection is probably less reliable and takes more time
(Zahavi, in prep., also see below, the comparison of monomorphic and
dimorphic plumage in birds).
Darwin has already pointed out the difficulty in judging in any one par-
ticular case how much of a character developed as a consequence of natural
selection and how much by sexual selection. The effects of both types of
selection are often mixed from the beginning, since sexual selection prefer-
ably acts on characters which have already been correlated with quality.
Natural selection can also affect characters which have evolved by sexual
selection, if these gain some new function. Hence it is almost impossible
to separate clearly the effects of natural selection which are responsible for
the adaptive value of the character from those of sexual selection which
developed its advertising component. A discussion of the effect of sexual
selection will therefore have to be speculative.
The discussion of a sample of characters, which follows, aims to present
some of the possible effects of mate preference. The value of the characters
discussed is explained by the tests they impose on the individuals which
bear them. It is clearly understood that the evolution of all these characters
may bc explained by more than one hypothesis. The discussion of the
examples is given as a model of yet another way to consider the characters.
To determine in any case which of the alternatives is the true explanation,
calls both for a detailed examination of the facts and for further experimental
confirmation. The cases are not presented as a proof of the handicap
principle. My aim is to call the attention to the possibility that the value
of many characters may reside in their action as testing devices.
Characters which attract the other sex cannot always be separated from
those which intimidate rivals of the same sex. Generally the effects of mate
preference should be much larger than those which result from intrasexual
conflicts. The reasons for all this will be discussed elsewhere. Fisher (1930)
came to the same conclusion when he stated that male ornaments acquired
through male-male conflict may be striking but could scarcely ever become
as extravagant as characters which develop to impress a potential mate.
In many species of birds, the female is cryptic while the male is colourful.
The accepted explanation is that females cannot withstand the extra preda-
tion pressure involved in colourful plumage since they have to attend more
to the nest. The colourful plumage of the male is supposed to attract females
and intimidate other males. But there are as many species in which both sexes
are cryptic. Males of such species also mate and fight their rivals. The inter-
esting question is why should some species “find it better” to be excited or
intimidated by the more colourful males? This will only make sense if
colourful males are of better quality. I suggest that a mature, colourful
male has already proved itself to be of a better quality (than one with
cryptic plumage) since it has already withstood the extra predation risk
involved in its plumage. Hence colourful plumage is a mark of quality, and
it is to the advantage of the females to be attracted by colourful males. It is
probably more difficult to discriminate quality among mates with cryptic
plumage. Another way to evaluate the quality of a cryptic male is to observe
it over long periods. Species which have environmental conditions allowing
for prolonged periods of pair formation, or others which cannot put males
to a high predation risk probably, choose such a strategy. This may explain
Lein’s (1973) finding that monomorphic species of warblers take longer
to pair than sexually dimorphic species with colourful male plumage. This
may be the reason why northern duck species, whose short breeding season
demands a short period of pair formation, evolved striking male plumage.
Where time for breeding is short and where males do not participate as
much in parental care, males evolve the colourful plumage as a result of
female preference. The male’s colourful plumage then serves as a mark of
quality and helps females choose good quality males.
Mayr (1972) suggested that the striking male pattern of drakes reduces
interspecies hybridization. Therefore populations, which do not face a
hybridization risk, loose their bright male plumage. But why did not duck
species evolve other isolating mechanisms less risky than bright plumage
patterns ? An alternative hypothesis to that presented by Mayr, is that the
bright male colouration of northern duck species evolved first as an indicator
of the quality of the drake. The colourful plumage, which probably varied
geographically according to various environmental selective pressures,
eliminated hybridization between duck populations to the extent that other
isolating mechanisms were not necessary and hence could not evolve. The
above hypothesis, as to the adaptive significance of the colourful male
plumage, is not presented as conclusive evidence to prove the principle of
testing a mate through a handicap. It is presented to show yet another
way to consider the known facts. The same is also true for the rest of the
examples which follow.
The excessive tail plumes of the peacock which seem to attract the females
obviously deletorious to the survival of the individual. The more brilliant
the plumes the more conspicuous the male to predators, and the longer the
plumes the more difficult it may be for the male to escape predators or to
move about during everyday activity. Hence, only the best males would
be able to sustain the handicap. Therefore, if females select for males handi-
capped by long plumes, they select for quality. It would certainly be better
for females to choose high quality males which were not handicapped by the
plumes. Therefore we have to assume that a discrimination for quality is
more difficult without the test of the plumes.
Many, if not all, sexual displays endanger their performers. Many of them
seem to be designed specifically for that purpose. Warblers sing out of cover.
Lek species dance daily in the open in the same places. The extra risk which
is taken cannot be just to communicate the whereabouts of a male ready
to mate.
Males probably try to communicate their quality. Since good
quality birds can take larger risks it is not surprising that sexual displays
in many cases evolved to proclaim quality by showing the amount of risk
the bird can take and still survive. If displays had evolved to communicate
in the most efficient way
whereabouts of a bird, in saving energy and
reducing predation hazard, as many alarm caIls have evolved (Marler, 1955),
they would not serve as markers of quality.
Although in this discussion the female is usually referred to as the selecting
sex and the male as the selected sex, it should be born in mind that both
sexes may select and sexual selection may get its effect on both sexes, as is
the case in some monomorphic species. Sometimes the female is more
affected by sexual selection as is the case in quite a number of species
(Selander, 1972; Trivers, 1972).
Coulson (1968) investigated the role of mate preference in a breeding
colony of kittiwakes. These birds fight ferociously with one another to
occupy central territories. Coulson found that birds which breed in the centre
of the colony are of a better quality, as judged by their reproductive per-
formance, than birds breeding in the periphery of the colony. Hence a female
which pairs with a male on a central territory, pairs with a good quality
male. Patterson (1964) found that centrally located territories in the black-
headed gull are more protected from predators so that the fight for central
territories, in that case, could be explained as a consequence of predation
pressure. However, the kittiwakes nest on cliffs and are comparatively free
of predation. Many well-protected sites in the colony are vacant when the
ferocious fight for the central territories is going on. A fight for central sites
in colonies is found also in large sea birds like the gannets which nest on
islands free from predators. An initial tendency to breed together,
in order to get information about food (Ward & Zahavi, 1973), may
give rise to some fights for centrally located sites, since in the centre the
birds are more protected and perhaps get more information. Such fights,
however small, may further evolve through mate preference to serve as an
index of quality. That particular method of testing mate quality has probably
evolved since the ability of colonial birds to fight one another for food is
important. Also, only the better quality birds can depart from offshore
feeding grounds early in the season and succeed in occupying the central
places on the cliffs. Central birds handicap themselves when they invest
time and energy in the fight for the centre but they are compensated by better
quality mates.
Territorial behaviour presents an interesting problem since often males
claim territories which seem to be much larger than the birds may need.
It is not easy to see the selective agent for large territory size. Wynne-Edwards
(1962) suggested that its adaptive significance is to regulate levels of food
supply to population size. He argued that with a large territory the bird
insures the persistence of food supplies to future generations. Such altruistic
behaviour calls for group selection theory. Alternatively, the selection for a
mate may have its effect in this situation. Often males which occupy small
territories seem to be less successful in acquiring a mate (Watson, pers.
comm. ; Zahavi, unpublished observation on Uenunthe). Since a small territory
probably cannot easily support a family, a tendency to select a mate which
occupies a large territory may increase through mate preference to the extent
that males occupy territories much larger than their immediate needs. A fight
for a larger territory must be more difficult than a fight for a small one;
hence, males which succeed in occupying large territories should be of a
better quality than males which occupy small territories. Females which
select such males also select for quality. The conservation of food supply
for the population may be a side effect rather than the causal mechanism
which selects for territory size. O’Donald (1963) already suggested that sexual
selection may be involved in territorial behaviour but he understood some-
what differently the selective mechanism involved.
The contrasting black and white plumage displayed by many adult sea
birds, especially when flying and diving, serves in communication since they
attract more individuals to food sources. The evolution of the bright
“altruistic” plumage and its retention in a population is difficult to explain.
In a predominantly altruistic population, any individual with “selfish” dull
plumage may do better than an “‘altruistic” one, since it will benefit from
sources of food found by all other birds and will not have to share food
found by itself. An indication that mate preference may be involved is
furnished by the fact that only adult birds have the “altruistic” plumage
while immature ones, even when 2 years old, have “selfish” plumage. The
advantage in selecting a mate with “altruistic” plumage is that it selects
an individual which has already passed the test. This test is meaningful
because when breeding in colonies birds have to compete daily over food.
An alternative explanation of the altruistic behaviour may be on the lines
of reciprocal altruism (Trivers, 1971). Such an explanation calls for a mech-
nism of punishments to guard against selfish individuals. But if mate
preference is responsible for the selection of the altruistic character then no
punishment is needed and “altruism” is compensated for by a better quality
It is reasonabie to expect mate preference in a11 sexually reproducing
organisms. As a consequence (if natural selection allows) one would expect
also the evolution of markers for the differentiation of quality in individuals.
O’Donald (1963) suggested that altruistic behaviour may function as a
marker for quality and that it is selected for through mate preference.
Unfortunately that idea has not been followed, perhaps because it was
believed that the evolution of exaggerations (handicaps), through mate
preference, is only a by-product of a “run-away” process (Fisher, 1930;
O’Donald, 1962). When the handicap caused by mate preference is con-
sidered as the key to the selection process rather than its byproduct (Fig. 1)
it is reasonable to expect handicaps, and consequently also altruistic
behaviour, to be widespread phenomena.
Some of the arguments in support of the handicap principle in the evolution
of mate preference are given by Emlen (1973), but at the same time he accepted
the possibility of a random fixation of such characters. He suggested also
that in some cases the importance of the character is in the ability of the
animal to waste its energy to show off its prowess. But according to him
the special means by which it shows its prowess have often been accidentally
The handicap principle as understood here suggests that the marker of
quality should evolve to handicap the selected sex in a character which is
important to the selecting sex, since the selecting sex tests, through the handi-
cap, the quality of its potential mate in characters which are of importance.
Hence the attracting character which evolved through mate preference
should be related to the special ecological problems of the species. The adap-
tive significance of the attracting character should lower the fitness of the
selected sex in relation to the main ecological problems of the species. The
selecting sex should be attracted by a marker only when the handicap it
imposes on its mate and its offspring is smaller than the advantage gained
by securing a better (tested) mate. This evolutionary mechanism need not
be different in its rate from any other selection process. The attracting
characters should evolve only as a consequence of an environmental change
which requires a different kind of test.
I should wish to thank Prof. R. K. Selander for much encouragement and criti-
cism and Prof. Maynard Smith and Dr R. Trivers for discussing the idea. Dr A.
Terkel, Dr Y. Terkel and my wife Dr Avishag Kadman-Zahavi were of much
help both in discussing the idea and in improving its presentation. Thanks are
due to Z. Tamir for typing the manuscript.
COULSON, J. C. (1968).
Nature, Lond.
217, 478.
The Descent
Man and Selection in Relation to Sex.
2nd edn. London:
John Murray.
EMLEN, J. M. (1973).
Ecology, an Evolutionary Approach.
Reading, Massachusetts:
(1930). 117ze Genetical Theory
Natural Selection.
Oxford: Clarendon
LEIN, M. R. (1973). The biological significance of some communication patterns of wood
warblers (Parulidae). Unnublished Ph.D. Thesis. Harvard.
MARLER, P.‘(1955).
176, 6.
MAYNARD SMITH, J. (1958). In
A Century
Darwin (S.
A. Barnett, ed.). Cambridge:
Harvard Univ. Press.
MAYR, E. (1972). In
Sexual Selection and the Descent
(B. Campbell, ed.). Chicago :
Aldine Publ. Co.
O’DONALD, P. (1962).
17, 541.
(1963). Heredity
18, 361.
POULTON, E. D. (1890).
The Colours
Animals: Their Meaning and Use Especially Con-
sidered in the Case
of Insects.
London : Kegan Paul, Trench Trubner & Co.
PATTERSON, I. (1964). Timing and spacing of broods of the black headed gull
L. Ph.D. Thesis, Oxford.
SELANDER, R. K. (1972). In
Sexual Selection and the Descent
(B. Campbell, ed.).
Chicago: Aldine Publ. Co.
R. L. (1971).
Q. Rev. Biol. 46, 35.
TRI~ERS, R. L. (1972). In
Sexual Selection and the Descent
of Man
(B. Campbell, ed.).
Chicago: Aldine Publ. Co.
(1889). Darwinism: An Exposition
the Theory
Natural Selection
with Some
its Applications.
London: MacMillan & Co.
WARD, P. & ZAHAVI, A. (1973).
115, 517.
G. C. (1966). Adagtation and Natural Selection: A Critique
Some Current
Evolutionary Thought.
Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour.
Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd Ltd.
... Under such circumstances, signals must be reliable to be used by the receivers (Searcy & Nowicki, 2005). The condition-dependence/handicap hypothesis assumes that signals need to be costly to be reliable (Grafen, 1990;Zahavi, 1975). It follows that only high-quality individuals (e.g., those who are strong or in good condition) should be able to bear the cost of maintaining the most elaborate ornaments. ...
... Second, different signals may have different costs, and females may preferentially display ornaments that are less costly. In accordance with the conditiondependence/handicap hypothesis (Grafen, 1990;Zahavi, 1975), ornaments must have a cost to evolve into signals. However, according to the esthetic evolution hypothesis (Hill, 2015;Price, Stoddard, Shevell, & Bloch, 2019;Prum, 2012;Renoult, Bovet, & Raymond, 2016;Renoult & Mendelson, 2019), cost is not a prerequisite. ...
Full-text available
Female ornamentation is frequently observed in animal species and is sometimes found as more evolutionary labile than male ornamentation. A complex array of factors may explain its presence and variation. Here we assessed the role of female cost of reproduction and paternal care. Both factors have been pinpointed as important by theoretical studies but have not been investigated yet in details at the interspecific level. We worked on 133 species of North temperate Passeriformes bird species for which both the clutch volume – here taken as the proxy of female cost of reproduction – and amount of paternal care are relatively well known. Using spectrometry, we measured the whole‐body coloured plumage patches and quantified three metrics corresponding to brightness (i.e. achromatic component), colour chromaticity (i.e. intensity) and colour volume (i.e. diversity). We found a strong association between male and female colour metrics. Controlling for this association, we found additional small but detectable effects of both cost of reproduction and paternal care. First, females of species with more paternal care were slightly brighter. Second, the interaction between the level of paternal care and egg volume was correlated with female colour intensity: females with more paternal care were more chromatic, with this association mostly present when their investment in reproduction was low. Together these results suggest that female cost of reproduction and paternal care are part of the multiple factors explaining variation of female coloration, besides the strong covariation between male and female coloration. To a lesser extent than male conspicuous plumage, female plumage colouration may also vary across bird species. This study explores the role of egg production and male parental care in the evolution of female plumage colouration, using 133 species of songbirds.
... In order to explain environmental status signaling (ESS), it is important to understand costly signaling theory as ESS is deeply rooted in it. The costly signaling theory refers to individuals engaging in costly behaviors (e.g., spending more on economic, social, and material resources) to acquire higher social status through status-enhancing behaviors which signal information about themselves (Sivanathan & Pettit, 2010;Zahavi, 1975). As explained by the costly signaling theory, an individual's display of luxury products showcases that she or he is able to spend more money or absorb higher costs and is, therefore, wealthier and of a higher social status (Berger, 2017). ...
This study examined whether environmental status signaling (ESS) applied to purchase situations involving three environmental products in hospitality and tourism: an environment-friendly car, an organically-produced wine, and a green hotel. Findings from three scenario-based quasi-experimental studies suggested that ESS differed across the type of green product and the consumption setting. When status motive was high, consumers would purchase the environment-friendly car over its more-luxurious conventional counterpart across all consumption settings. Higher purchase intention was also found for the more luxurious hotel over the environment-friendly hotel and for the organically-produced wine over the better-rated conventional wine in private settings. These effects disappeared in the public setting. Moreover, ESS was independent of whether green products were priced equal or more. Recommendations on how to promote the personal benefits of green products and improve performance, design, and packaging of the green products were provided to practitioners in the hospitality and tourism industry.
... "Open and honest communication is needed also, when there is a problem, put up your hand and say we need to talk; we get around the table and sort it out." Alpha 3 Since communication is two ways, clients also have to articulate their objectives to enable proper signalling from contractors on their suitability in keeping with the propositions of signalling theory (Zahavi, 1975). Proactive Attribute Being proactive is also an important attribute impacting long-term collaborative relationships from the findings across the data. ...
The construction industry is increasingly embracing long-term collaborative relationships for project delivery. Since it is not all contractors that are suitable for collaboration and long-term relationships, and most clients are familiar with traditional practices of selecting contractors, there is need for an understanding on the critical attributes to consider in selecting contractors for long-term collaborative relationship contracts. The aim of this study is to determine the appropriate attributes required of contractors to successfully perform in long-term collaborative relationship contracts. The qualitative research methodology was adopted in this study, consisting of multiple case studies of organisations employing framework contracts in South Africa. Data for the study were collected via semi-structured interviews with 16 key informants of eight purposively selected organisations. The data were analysed with the aid of Nvivo 11 qualitative data analysis software utilising thematic qualitative data analysis techniques and presented using word clouds and direct quotes from key informants. The findings indicate that the critical attributes to consider when selecting contractors for long-term collaborative relationships are: team working attribute, commitment, innovativeness, and attributes relating to the behaviour and attitude of the contractors, such as openness, honesty, trust, transparency, ethical and being realistic. These critical attributes are add-ons to other general attributes (such as technical capacity, experience, and price) for contractor selection which are already sufficiently articulated in literature. The study result provides knowledge that can aid better decision making in selecting appropriate contractor for long-term collaborative relationship contracts in the construction Industry
... Firstly, male-male competition resulting in intrasexual selection may be associated with the evolution of male armaments, such as weapons (Andersson 1994), or color badges (Andersson 1994;Olsson 1992a) that may be used to signal fighting ability (Barrette and Vandal, 1990;Olsson 1994a;Stapley and Whiting, 2006). Secondly, female choice, or intersexual selection, may reinforce the evolution of male ornaments (Berglund et al., 1996) via Fisherian runaway processes (Fisher 1930;Andersson 1994) or indicator mechanisms (Fisher 1915;Zahavi 1975;Andersson 1994;Morris et al., 2007). Irrespective of the evolutionary sequence of events, variation in the magnitude of sexually selected traits may affect individual relative fitness (Hamilton and Zuk, 1982;Zuk et al., 1990;Olsson et al., 1994a;Vega-Trejo et al., 2017). ...
Full-text available
Animal color signals may function as indicators of fighting ability when males compete for access to females. This allows opponents to settle aggressive interactions before they escalate into physical combat and injury. Thus, there may be strong directional selection on these traits, towards enhanced signal quality. This renders sexually selected traits particularly susceptible to inbreeding depression, due to relatively low ratios of additive genetic variance to dominance variance. We measured the effects of inbreeding on an intrasexually selected color signal (“the badge”) in a population of Swedish sand lizards (Lacerta agilis) using the Rhh software based on 17-21 microsatellites. Males of this sexually dichromatic species use the badge during aggressive interactions to display, and assess, fighting ability. We found negative effects of homozygosity on badge size, saturation, and brightness. However, no such effects were observed on color hue. Pair-wise correlations between badge size, hue, and saturation were all statistically significant. Thus, the sand lizard ‘badge’ is a multicomponent signal with variation explained by covariation in badge size, saturation and color hue. Body mass corrected for skeletal size (“body condition”) positively predicted badge size and saturation, encouraging future research on the extent that sexual signals may convey information on multigene targets (i.e., ‘genic capture’).
... The exhibition of epic ornaments or risky behaviors unequivocally signals to potential partners or competitors the genetic quality and good condition of the individual (214, 215). This is the handicap principle: Signals are reliable precisely because of their prohibitive cost, as a less gifted individual cannot develop or maintain such ornaments, just as most people cannot afford a 65-m yacht (216,217). Strong sexual selection may sometimes compromise survival (214, 218). However, mating success impacts on reproductive output more directly than any other component of fitness and can spread traits even at the cost of increased mortality (180). ...
Full-text available
Personality disorders (PDs) are currently considered dysfunctions. However, personality differences are older than humanity and are ubiquitous in nature, from insects to higher primates. This suggests that a number of evolutionary mechanisms—other than dysfunctions—may be able to maintain stable behavioral variation in the gene pool. First of all, apparently maladaptive traits may actually improve fitness by enabling better survival or successful mating or reproduction, as exemplified by neuroticism, psychopathy, and narcissism. Furthermore, some PDs may harm important biological goals while facilitating others, or may be globally beneficial or detrimental depending on environmental circumstances or body condition. Alternatively, certain traits may form part of life history strategies: Coordinated suites of morphological, physiological and behavioral characters that optimize fitness through alternative routes and respond to selection as a whole. Still others may be vestigial adaptations that are no longer beneficial in present times. Finally, variation may be adaptative in and by itself, as it reduces competition for finite resources. These and other evolutionary mechanisms are reviewed and illustrated through human and non-human examples. Evolutionary theory is the best-substantiated explanatory framework across the life sciences, and may shed light on the question of why harmful personalities exist at all.
... The advantage of these kinds of marking is that chemical cues are long lasting and less costly than other mechanisms of advertizing their presence (Brennan and Kendrick 2006). Chemical communication has, anyway, a metabolic cost that makes them honest signals that cannot be bluffed, under the paradigm of handicap theory (Zahavi 1975). ...
Animal communication depends on signals conveying information to a receiver who must perceive and decode them. Signals involved in territoriality are usually complex stimuli that should be correctly interpreted to avoid unnecessary conflicts. Lacertids use both visual and chemical stimuli in modulating their aggressive response against conspecifics and the rival’s size is one of the most important information, affecting the success probability in combat. To assess the actual ability of decoding information about a rival’s size based on its chemical stimulus alone, 60 males of Podarcis muralis were tested for three consecutive days in an arena bearing a mirror (to simulate an equal-sized intruder), and the chemical cues (femoral secretions) from an unknown individual of different size. Significant differences were observed in tongue-flicks number, which grew as the size difference between the focal lizard and the secretion donor decreased. This can be interpreted as the need for the lizard to better evaluate the potential competitor’s characteristics. The size difference also affected the number of bites against the mirror. They increased when the size of the focal lizard was larger than the donor triggering the aggressive response with a higher probability of winning the contest. This confirms that the focal lizard had correctly decoded the information about the opponent’s size by chemical stimulus. Although previous studies have shown that some components of the chemical signals are potentially informative about the signaler’s size, this is the first demonstration that male P. muralis is actually able to decode and use such information.
The interface of sexual behavior and evolutionary psychology is a rapidly growing domain, rich in psychological theories and data as well as controversies and applications. With nearly eighty chapters by leading researchers from around the world, and combining theoretical and empirical perspectives, The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Sexual Psychology is the most comprehensive and up-to-date reference work in the field. Providing a broad yet in-depth overview of the various evolutionary principles that influence all types of sexual behaviors, the handbook takes an inclusive approach that draws on a number of disciplines and covers nonhuman and human psychology. It is an essential resource for both established researchers and students in psychology, biology, anthropology, medicine, and criminology, among other fields. Volume 2: Male Sexual Adaptations addresses theory and research focused on sexual adaptations in human males.
Over two thousand years ago, Oaxaca, Mexico, was the site of one of the New World's earliest episodes of primary state formation and urbanism, and today it is one of the world's archaeologically best-studied regions. This volume, which thoroughly revises and updates the first edition, provides a highly readable yet comprehensive path to acquaint readers with one of the earliest and best-known examples of Native American state formation and its consequences as seen from the perspectives of urbanism, technology, demography, commerce, households, and religion and ritual. Written by prominent archaeological researchers who have devoted decades to Oaxacan research and to the development of suitable social theory, the book places ancient Oaxaca within the context of the history of ideas that have addressed the causes and consequences of social evolutionary change. It also critically evaluates the potential applicability of more recent thinking about state building grounded in collective action and related theories.
A lesson in evolutionary theory can be drawn from the work of Rick Charnov, who transformed Fisher’s sex ratio theory into sex allocation theory, but unfortunately, the lesson has not spread far enough. The lesson is that costs as well as frequencies need to be included. That is so whether we are talking about evolutionary ecology (e.g., density dependence), social evolution (e.g., sexual selection), origins, an extended evolutionary synthesis, multilevel selection, or whatever. The two dimensions can be expressed in a variety of ways—investing as well as spending, quality as well as quantity, costs as well as frequencies, and somatic as well as reproductive functions, for example. Both are needed everywhere in evolutionary theory.
Full-text available
A model is presented to account for the natural selection of what is termed reciprocally altruistic behavior. The model shows how selection can operate against the cheater (non-reciprocator) in the system. Three instances of altruistic behavior are discussed, the evolution of which the model can explain: (1) behavior involved in cleaning symbioses; (2) warning cries in birds; and (3) human reciprocal altruism. Regarding human reciprocal altruism, it is shown that the details of the psychological system that regulates this altruism can be explained by the model. Specifically, friendship, dislike, moralistic aggression, gratitude, sympathy, trust, suspicion, trustworthiness, aspects of guilt, and some forms of dishonesty and hypocrisy can be explained as important adaptations to regulate the altruistic system. Each individual human is seen as possessing altruistic and cheating tendencies, the expression of which is sensitive to developmental variables that were selected to set the tendencies at a balance ap...
The nests of the Black-headed Gull Larus ridibundus are closely aggregated into dense colonies and their use synchronized, these two phenomena together tending to produce a maximal clumping effect. Within such a colony however, nests were found to be spaced out to produce a non-random uniform distribution. The commonest distance between neighbouring nests was found to be about one metre, in contrast to related species. This study was concerned with two aspects of this distribution pattern; its survival value and its behavioural causation. It was found that pairs nesting just outside the colony had a much lower breeding success than those nesting in the colony and that nests on the colony fringe had a slightly lower success than those in the centre. Pairs laying during the peak laying period had a higher breeding success than pairs laying either earlier or later in the season. Since by far the most important mortality agent was predation, it seems likely that both clustering and synchronization of nesting function as antipredator systems and arguments in favour of this are discussed. Variations in nest-spacing within the colony were not correlated with variations in breeding success. In the causation of the spacing between nests, territorial aggression was demonstrated to be an effective dispersion mechanism and the way in which this mechanism works was investigated in detail. This spacing mechanism was not sufficient by itself to explain the observed densities, which were higher than one would expect from the aggression alone; there was also some tendency for birds establishing a new nest-site to cluster close to others. The interaction between this, the territorial aggression of the residents and the subsequent avoidance responses of the settling birds, can explain the nest spacing pattern and probably also the observed densities.
In the current resurgence of interest in the biological basis of animal behavior and social organization, the ideas and questions pursued by Charles Darwin remain fresh and insightful. This is especially true of The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Darwin's second most important work. This edition is a facsimile reprint of the first printing of the first edition (1871), not previously available in paperback. The work is divided into two parts. Part One marshals behavioral and morphological evidence to argue that humans evolved from other animals. Darwin shoes that human mental and emotional capacities, far from making human beings unique, are evidence of an animal origin and evolutionary development. Part Two is an extended discussion of the differences between the sexes of many species and how they arose as a result of selection. Here Darwin lays the foundation for much contemporary research by arguing that many characteristics of animals have evolved not in response to the selective pressures exerted by their physical and biological environment, but rather to confer an advantage in sexual competition. These two themes are drawn together in two final chapters on the role of sexual selection in humans. In their Introduction, Professors Bonner and May discuss the place of The Descent in its own time and relation to current work in biology and other disciplines.
An official journal of the Genetics Society, Heredity publishes high-quality articles describing original research and theoretical insights in all areas of genetics. Research papers are complimented by News & Commentary articles and reviews, keeping researchers and students abreast of hot topics in the field.
An official journal of the Genetics Society, Heredity publishes high-quality articles describing original research and theoretical insights in all areas of genetics. Research papers are complimented by News & Commentary articles and reviews, keeping researchers and students abreast of hot topics in the field.
IN many bird colonies there is a surplus of adult birds in or about the colony which fail to breed1,2. In several species, the failure to breed can be attributed to the inability to obtain a suitable nest-site within the colony limits, and this results in competition for the limited number of available sites. Experiments on the kittiwake Rissa tridactyla have shown that some of these non-breeding adults will breed if suitable unoccupied ledges are made available in the centre of the colony, but similar sites remain unused on the periphery (Coulson, in preparation). This and other observations indicate that the competition among males, which are responsible for nest-site selection, is more intense in the colony centre and investigations were made to determine whether the birds nesting centrally in the colony differed in quality from those breeding near the edge.