No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Effects of interstimulus interval on slow phase velocity to ipsilateral warm air caloric stimulation in normal subjects
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of interstimulus interval on slow phase velocity (SPV) to ipsilateral warm air caloric stimulation in normal subjects. Results suggest that about 3 minutes should intervene between the offset of one irrigation and the onset of the second irrigation. This finding supports the hypothesis that carryover effects are likely only when nystagmus from the preceding irrigation overlaps the subsequent irrigation. If correct, clinicians do not have to wait a fixed time period between stimuli, but can initiate caloric stimulation as soon as nystagmus has ceased from the preceding irrigation. This recommendation compensates for individual and procedural differences. Test-retest reliability also was investigated. Findings suggest that when immediate test-retest differences exceed approximately 6 degrees/second (95% confidence interval), the examiner should administer additional trials until stability is ascertained. Moreover, unusual or significant findings should be verified with repeat testing.
... Participants were instructed to look straight ahead with the eyes open while wearing opaque goggles to prevent visual fixation. Eye movement recording continued for ∼3 min after the cessation of irrigation, with 7 min intervals between irrigations (22). During each recording, participants were asked to perform a simple cognitive task to remain alert during the trial (23,24). ...
Electrical Vestibular Stimulation (EVS) is a non-invasive technique for activating the vestibular-ocular reflex, evoking mainly a torsional eye movement response. We have previously demonstrated that this response can be used to detect vestibular asymmetry in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS). Here we perform a direct comparison of EVS with caloric irrigation in this patient group. We studied 30 patients with unilateral VS, alongside an equal number of aged-matched healthy control subjects. EVS current was delivered to the mastoid process in a monaural configuration using a sinusoidal stimulus (2 Hz; ± 2 mA; 10 s), with an electrode placed over the spinous C7 process. Evoked eye movements were recorded from the right eye in darkness using an infra-red sensitive camera while the subject sat relaxed with their head on a chinrest. Ocular torsion was subsequently tracked off-line using iris striations. Each subject separately underwent water caloric irrigation, in accordance with the British Society of Audiology guidelines. For the caloric test, eye movement was recorded in the yaw axis using electro-oculography. For both EVS and calorics, inter-aural response asymmetry was calculated to determine the extent of canal paresis. Both tests revealed impaired vestibular function in the ipsilesional ear of VS patients, with a mean asymmetry ratio of 15 ± 17% and 18 ± 16% for EVS and calorics, respectively. Overall, the caloric test results discriminated controls from patients slightly more effectively than EVS (Cohen's D effect size = 1.44 vs. 1.19). Importantly, there was a significant moderate correlation between the AR values produced by EVS and calorics (r = 0.53, p < 0.01), and no significant difference between mean AR estimates. When questioned, ≥85% of participants subjectively preferred the EVS experience, in terms of comfort. Moreover, it took ~15 min to complete, vs. ~1 h for caloric. These results confirm that the results of the EVS test broadly agree with those of caloric irrigation, in terms of detecting vestibular asymmetry. Furthermore, they suggest a higher degree of convenience and patient comfort.
Objective: To measure nystagmus duration after warm and cool caloric water irrigations, with the aim of providing preliminary evidence for the optimum interval between irrigation onsets; and to compare nystagmus durations between warm and cool irrigations, in addition to maximum slow phase velocity (SPV).
Design: Participants underwent up to four caloric irrigations during routine appointments. Nystagmus was recorded to minimal levels (within 2°/s of subject’s baseline). The nystagmus duration and maximum SPV were measured.
Study Sample: 52 vestibular assessment patients (99 ears).
Results: The mean nystagmus duration was 183.9 s (seconds) (3:04 min) from irrigation onset, and nystagmus became minimal after 264.8 s (4:25 min) in 97.5% of this sample. The population mean is within ±6.7 s of the sample mean (p = <0.001). There was no significant difference between warm and cool irrigation durations, and correlation and linear regression analysis showed duration cannot reliably be predicted by maximum SPV.
Conclusions: Mean nystagmus duration (3 min after irrigation onset) and nystagmus duration for 97.5% of patients (<4.5 min) were substantially less than the BSA recommended 7 min between irrigations. These findings provide preliminary evidence for shortening of intervals between stimulus onsets, regardless of irrigation temperature or maximum SPV, to reduce caloric testing time and improve clinical efficiency.
Objectives:
To evaluate whether monothermal caloric screening can reduce the number of caloric irrigations required in the vestibular testing battery while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.
Design:
Prospective controlled cohort study. Three hundred and ninety patients referred for vestibular testing at this tertiary referral health system over a 1-year period were evaluated; 24 patients met exclusion or failure criteria and 366 patients were included in the study. Population was 35.6% male; average age was 50.4 years old. Each patient underwent caloric testing using either warm or cool water irrigation initially and this data was used for monothermal screening data. All patients then completed bithermal binaural caloric testing to obtain the "gold standard" bithermal data for comparison. The sensitivity and specificity of monothermal cool or monothermal warm caloric tests were calculated using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Results:
Using a monothermal interear difference threshold of 25%, warm monothermal screening had sensitivity of 98.0%, specificity of 91.3%, false negative rate of 2%, and false positive rate of 8.7%. Cool monothermal screening also had excellent sensitivity (92.3%) and specificity (95.3)%, with a false negative rate of 7.7%, and a false positive rate of 4.7%. The diagnosis associated with the single false negative warm monothermal caloric test was compensated vestibular paresis. In the study population, 71.9% had a -negative monothermal screen; if the monothermal data were accepted, 2 fewer irrigations would have been performed resulting in an average saving of $264 (typical Medicare reimbursement for 2 irrigations) billed per patient screened as well as shortening the average testing battery by about 15 min.
Conclusions:
Warm monothermal caloric screening can reduce time and cost of vestibular testing while nearly matching the diagnostic accuracy of bithermal testing.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.