ArticlePDF Available

Classification of Islamic literature in Pakistani libraries: A survey

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to draw an exact and accurate picture of classification problems being faced by libraries having a reasonable amount of collections on Islam. Different classification systems have been developed during the last two centuries to organize library materials. Where these systems provided libraries with better solution for organization of materials, the systems have also some limitations. Religious materials are one of the areas where these systems could not satisfy a reasonable number of libraries. The libraries that have rich collections on Islam are also facing such problems. This study has been conducted with the aim of addressing this problem. Design/methodology/approach: The study comprises a precise review of literature relevant to this problem, along with the collection and analysis of data from such libraries from all the main cities of Pakistan. The data have been collected using the interview technique. Findings: The review of literature and empirical data collected for this study show that the libraries are facing problems regarding the classification of materials where there are rich collections on Islam. The standard classification systems have not provided proper place and enumeration to Islamic topics in their schemes. There is no standard or uniform practice among the libraries to classify materials on Islam. Different libraries are using different systems, which has resulted placement of same materials at different locations. There is no coordination among libraries having rich collections on Islam for some common plan of action to resolve the problem in hand. No work on automated classification has been done in Pakistan so far and this is the area that needs working on in the future. Research limitations/implications: The paper focusses on materials in libraries in one country only, however highlights issues relevant to other Islamic countries in organizing such materials. Originality/value: The paper discusses an area of professional concern that has been discussed widely in Islamic countries, but only in a limited fashion outside of Islamic countries. Thus the paper should be of interest to researchers and practioners interested in cataloging theory.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Classification of
Islamic literature
149
Library Review
Vol. 59 No. 3, 2010
pp. 149-164
#Emerald Group Publishing Limited
0024-2535
DOI 10.1108/00242531011031142
Received 17 August 2009
Reviewed 20 September 2009
Revised 20 September 2009
Accepted 11 December 2009
Classification of Islamic
literature in Pakistani libraries
A survey
Haroon Idrees
Islamic Research Institute, International Islamic University,
Islamabad, Pakistan, and
Khalid Mahmood
Department of Library and Information Science, University of the Punjab,
Lahore, Pakistan
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to draw an exact and accurate picture of classification
problems being faced by libraries having a reasonable amount of collections on Islam. Different
classification systems have been developed during the last two centuries to organize library
materials. Where these systems provided libraries with better solution for organization of materials,
the systems have also some limitations. Religious materials are one of the areas where these systems
could not satisfy a reasonable number of libraries. The libraries that have rich collections on Islam are
also facing such problems. This study has been conducted with the aim of addressing this problem.
Design/methodology/approach – The study comprises a precise review of literature relevant to
this problem, along with the collection and analysis of data from such libraries from all the main
cities of Pakistan. The data have been collected using the interview technique.
Findings – The review of literature and empirical data collected for this study show that the libraries
are facing problems regarding the classification of materials where there are rich collections on Islam.
The standard classification systems have not provided proper place and enumeration to Islamic topics
in their schemes. There is no standard or uniform practice among the libraries to classify materials on
Islam. Different libraries are using different systems, which has resulted placement of same materials at
different locations. There is no coordination among libraries having rich collections on Islam for some
common plan of action to resolve the problem in hand. No work on automated classification has been
done in Pakistan so far and this is the area that needs working on in the future.
Research limitations/implications – The paper focusses on materials in libraries in one country
only, however highlights issues relevant to other Islamic countries in organizing such materials.
Originality/value – The paper discusses an area of professional concern that has been discussed
widely in Islamic countries, but only in a limited fashion outside of Islamic countries. Thus the paper
should be of interest to researchers and practioners interested in cataloging theory.
Keywords Cataloging, Classification schemes, Islam, Pakistan
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
The library is an organization that has played a vital role in the preservation and
transmission of human knowledge from one race to another race and from one
community to another. Libraries acquire different types of materials, process them,
arrange them and make them available to the library users at their ease. Classification
plays a significant role in the organization, physical arrangement, access and retrieval
of the library materials. Different standard classification systems, e.g. DDC, LCC, UDC,
CC and BC have been developed for this purpose. Most of these systems have been
developed by western authors. The authors were of such a background that they
provided sufficient provisions to the fields of western knowledge, but these schemes
lack adequate room for eastern/oriental fields of knowledge, languages and literature.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
www.emeraldinsight.com/0024-2535.htm
LR
59,3
150
Libraries that have a reasonable amount of literature on Islam and its related
disciplines are facing problem, while using above-mentioned classification systems to
classify and arrange the materials in such a way that could help and support the
library users effectively and efficiently. Reason to this problem is the unavailability of a
suitable classification system, which may cover all aspects of Islamic literature
comprehensively. For example, DDC, the most widely used library classification
scheme throughout the world (Chan, 1981) has provided only one notation out of 1,000
for Islam, i.e. 297, whereas almost 70 notations (220-289) have been specified for
Christianity. This notation (297) has been provided with further extension, but that is
insufficient and inconvenient for libraries that have rich collections on Islam. On the
other hand, this fact cannot be denied that literature is being produced very extensively
on Islam and its different aspects. Moreover, many new disciplines and topics are
emerging in the body of knowledge of Islamic studies. This has created a substantial
problem of classification for libraries that have built the collections on Islam at length.
This study aims to draw an exact and accurate picture of classification problems being
faced by libraries having a reasonable amount of collections on Islam. The effort has
been made to discover the classification practices of such libraries, their ways to
handle this problem and their level of satisfaction with classification systems. The
librarians have also been consulted to get their opinion for the possible solution of the
problem and its implementation.
Objectives and methods
This study was designed to achieve the following objectives:
(1) To draw an accurate picture of the classification problems being faced by the
libraries that have reasonably good collections on Islam.
(2) To know classification practices of such libraries to overcome the problem.
(3) To discover satisfaction level of the libraries with presently adopted
classification systems.
(4) To know the opinion of librarians of such libraries regarding the possible
solution to the problem.
Literature relevant to the problem was collected and reviewed so that the better
understanding of the problem could be developed and areas of exploration be found.
The phenomenon is of social nature and there are not much quantifiable variables
involved in this study. The problem was also related to exploration of subjective
aspects of human experience. People perception of the potential solution of the problem
was also to be found. Therefore, it was considered that the qualitative methods would
be a better option for this study rather than the quantitative methods as indicated by
Powell and Connaway (2004, p. 59). Interviewing technique for data collection was
selected, keeping in view its benefits and suitability as mentioned by Gorman and
Clayton, i.e.
.immediacy;
.mutual exploration;
.investigation of causation;
.personal contact; and
.speed.
Classification of
Islamic literature
151
There are three types of interview:
(1) structured;
(2) semistructured; and
(3) non-structured (Gorman and Clayton, 2005, pp. 125-42).
Semistructured interviewing was selected. A structure of interview was prepared, but
was not strictly observed. New ideas or concepts evolved during the interviews were
also incorporated. Wording of questions was as per environment and circumstances. A
sample of 40 librarians from all major cities of Pakistan was drawn, while 35 of them
were successfully interviewed. Despite repeated efforts, five subjects could not be
contacted and made available for interview.
Review of literature
The Muslims have been fond of and attracted towards establishing libraries since early
periods of their history, even before the invention of printing press when preparation of
multiple copies was not an easy job. The library of Al-Sahib Ibn Ibad during the fourth
century of alhijrah, had a collection of 6,200 books, of which catalog was compiled in
ten volumes. Al-Aziz Fatimid had a collection of 1.6 million books in his library
(Dohaish, 1986). The establishment of world fame Darulhikma library during the
Abbasid era, Khazainulqusoor during Fatimid period with a collection of 1.6 million
books and Hakam II’s library with a collection of 400,000 books in Spain are
remarkable examples. This trend of public and many private libraries can be seen
throughout the Muslim history (Siddiqui, 1986, p. 36). Currently, a huge amount of
publishing and emergence of new topics in Islamic studies have been evidenced. When
a search on the books on Islam was made from an online bookseller, Amazon (2008), the
following data appeared as a result:
.Books published since September, 2001 to date were 50,436.
.Books published since September, 2002 to date were 42,185.
.Books published since September, 2003 to date were 36,523.
.Books published since September, 2004 to date were 26,370.
.Books published since September, 2005 to date were 18,631.
.Books published since September, 2006 to date were 9,858.
Brill (2008), one of the renowned publishers based in Leiden, The Netherlands is
currently publishing 20 journals on Islamic studies. They have published 39 book
series, 219 reference works, including world fame Encyclopaedias of Islam and Quran,
19 e-publications and 37 yearbooks on Islam. Currently available 406 out of 920 titles
on Islam have been published after 2001. This is noteworthy that all Brill publications
are thought to be research oriented. A search on the books available on Islam at Barnes
and Noble (2008), also an online bookseller, came with a result of 12,212 titles. Wide
ranging publications of many publishers in the Arab and other Muslim countries on
Islam are other than this. These data show that there is an extensive demand and
supply of books on Islam.
According to Riazuddin (1993), Qaisar (1974), Khurshid (1977), Usmani (1982),
Ibrahim (1981, 1982), Rizwi (1975), and S.J.A. Rizwi (1996), Khan (2004), the devisers of
standard and internationally known library classification systems were from western
LR
59,3
152
or non Muslim countries. They were of such background that they had either or both of
two limitations. One, very limited awareness of the depth, variety and wide range of
Islamic disciplines and literature being published on Islam. Second, they had some sort
of bias. Therefore, they provided very limited space for Islam and organization or
hierarchy of notations is also not proper. Example of DDC has been quoted where a
wide space has been allocated to Christianity and a very limited space has been
designated to Islam and other religions of the world. Figure 1 also supports this fact,
where in the start; a very limited approach towards Islam was adopted. Later, it was
evolved slowly, although it is still not comprehensive.
In response to the shortcomings of standard classification systems, many efforts
have been made to solve the problem. These efforts are of three types. Some folks have
made expansions in the given notation for Islam in DDC, i.e. 297. Shafi (1962), Hassan
(1973), Shaukkat (1970), Qaisar (1974), Ibrahim, (1981, 1982), Riazuddin (2002), Eraqi
(1985), TEBROC (1971) and Khan (2004) expansions are examples of this type of work.
Efforts were also made to get some of these expansions incorporated in DDC, but they
could not be successful. Some others amended the original organization of DDC’s class
of religion and they used the notations for Islam, which were originally allocated to
Christianity. Dr Shaniti (1960) of Egypt, King Abdul Aziz University of Saudi Arabia
(1977), Gondal (n.d.) and Sabzwari (2007) from Pakistan used 210-260 and Quaid-e-
Azam Library (n.d.) from Pakistan used 220-280 classes for this purpose. Indian
Institute of Islamic Studies (1974) made the same type of amendments in UDC. The
third type of works is that, which were done independently and they resulted either in
the form of a classification system, i.e. Labhu Ram (n.d.), McGill University and
Weryho (1979) as quoted by Gacek (2008), Islamic Research Institute (n.d.), Rehman
et al. (2003), or provided a framework for the development of a system as did Sardar
(1979). Some indigenous expansions and schemes have been given in Tables I-V for an
example.
Sardar has invented a framework for the development of a scheme as per given in
Table V.
The author used capital alphabets for main classes and small alphabets for
subclasses. Pre-main class includes the pre Islamic religions, i.e. pre-Judaic religions,
Judaism and Christianity. Main class includes 21 subclasses related to Islam and
different relevant fields of knowledge. Post main class includes the minority views,
i.e. Shia’ism, Ismailis, Bah’ism, Quadianism, etc., contemporary philosophies, i.e.
secularism, materialism etc. and common attributes that include the common terms
and can be synthesized with other main classes. While the auxiliary schedules include:
.time;
.geographical subdivisions;
.languages; and
.bibliographic form division.
Some authors have mentioned the problem and shortcomings of the standard systems
with some analysis and comparison and have indicated for the further work at some
good level in this regard. These authors are Chishti (1978, pp. 510-55), Bajwa (1969),
Hina Khan (1999), Usmani (1982) and Sabzwari (1982).
Dickinson (1916, pp. 29-35), Khurshid (1980), Elazar (2000), Broughton (2000),
Sabzwari (1981), Morgan (1996), Ibrahim (1982), Khan (1963, pp.107-8), Rehman et al.
(2003) and DDC editor-in-chief Mitchell (2005) have criticized the standard
Classification of
Islamic literature
153
classification systems for their emphasis on Christianity and inconvenience to classify
the materials on Islam and other religions.
Results and discussion
Results of data collected through interviews from the library practitioners, serving the
libraries with collections on Islam are being presented in this section.
Figure 1.
A brief comparison of
DDC and indigenous
expansions
LR
59,3
154
Type of libraries
In total, 35 libraries participated in the study. Academic libraries were in a majority (23,
66 percent). Other libraries included six special libraries (17 percent), five public libraries
(14 percent) and a national library (3 percent). Frequency and percent statistics of the
data have been shown in Table VI. The academic libraries included universities’ central,
institutional and seminar libraries (18; 78 percent), in which 16 were public sector
universities and two were private sector universities. Three were madrasa libraries
(Religious schools) (13 percent) and two were collegelibraries (9 percent).
Total library collection and collection on Islam
There were book collections in different sizes in the participant libraries. These
collections started from a minimum range of 8,000 and went up to a maximum of
500,000. There was only one library with a collection of less than 10,000 (3 percent).
The libraries having collections between 10,000 and 29,999 were ten in number (29
percent), seven libraries (20 percent) had collections between 30,000 and 49,999. The
libraries with collections between 50,000 and 99,999 were three (9 percent). The
libraries with collections between 100,000 and 200,000 were ten (29 percent). Four
libraries (11 percent) had collections of more than 200,000 (Table VII).
Tabl e I.
Qaisar’s proposed
alterations in DDC XVI
(1974)
Class no. Original in DDC XVI Proposed
297.13 Oral traditions Science of Hadith
297.2 Doctrines and dogmas Kalam
297.211 Allah Tawhid
297.3 Forms of worship Devotional and practical theology
297.38 Religious rites and ceremonies Shifted to 297.31
297.5 Morals, ideals, duties,
fast, alms giving
Used for morals and ideals, duties, fast
and alms giving shifted to the class of devotional
and practical theology, i.e. 297.3
297.6 Religious organization and leaders Muslim movements
Table II.
Scheme devised by
Rehman et al. (2003)
Sr. Notation Class description
1. 900 World, continents: geography and history
2. (900) Oceans: geography and history
3. 800 Literature
4. (800) Language
5. 700 The arts
6. (700) Tremendous deeds
7. 600 Technology
8. 500 Pure sciences
9. 400 Professional sciences
10. 300 Social sciences
11. 200 Religion
12. (200) Irreligion
13. 100 Rational sciences
14. (100) Irrational sciences
15. 000 General works
16. 01-09 Form divisions
Classification of
Islamic literature
155
Table IV.
Expansions devised by
Eraqi (1985)
Sr. Notation Class description
1. 297 Islam
2. 297.01-09 Subdivisions
3. 297.1 Qur’an
4. 297.2 Hadith
5. 297.3 Fiqh and Usul (Islamic law)
6. 297.4 Philosophy and beliefs
7. 297.5 Islamic sects and religions
8. 297.6 Islamic ethics
9. 297.7 Manners and Customs
10. 297.8 Sufism and mysticism
11. 297.9 Islamic history and geography
Table V.
Framework devised by
Sardar for a scheme
Sr. Class description
1. Pre-main class
2. Main class
3. Post main class
4. Auxiliary schedules
Table VI.
Types of libraries
Rank Type of library Frequency Percent
1. Academic 23 66
2. Special 6 17
3. Public 5 14
4. National 1 3
Table III.
Scheme devised by
Gondal (n.d.)
Sr. Notation Class description
1. 210 Islam and Islamic studies
2. 210.1-9 Standard subdivisions
3. 211 Philosophy and ideologies
4. 212 Islam and religions of the world
5. 213 Islamic morality
6. 214 Islam and other topics
7. 215 Sacred days, places, worships and shrines
8. 216 Islamic movements
9. 217 Propagation and spreading Islam
10. 218 Islamic literature
11. 219 Islamic biographies
12. 220 Quran and Quranic studies
13. 230 Hadith and Hadith studies
14. 240 Jurisprudence and studies
15. 250 Islamic government (Islamic organizations)
16. 260 Beliefs and sects
17. 270 Christianity
18. 280 Other religions
LR
59,3
156
There were different sizes of collections on Islam in the participant libraries. The
minimum collection on Islam was 2,000 and maximum was 150,000. There were five
libraries with collections of less than 10,000 (14 percent). The libraries that had
collections between 10,000 and 29,999 were 20 (57 percent). The libraries having
collections between 30,000 and 49,999 were three (9 percent). There were four libraries
with collections between 50,000 and 99,999 (11 percent). The libraries with collections
of over 100,000 were three (9 percent) (Table VIII).
In the 35 libraries, of which data were collected the total collection was 3,699,000.
The average per library/mean was 105,685.71. The collection on Islam in these libraries
was 1,053,000, with a mean of 30,085.71, while a collection of 2,646,000 volumes was on
other than Islamic topics. The percentage of collection on Islam in the total collection
was 28.47 percent. The summary of average collection per library is shown in Table IX
and ratio between collection on Islam and other collection is displayed in Figure 2.
Table VII.
Total library collections
Library collection Frequency Percent
<10,000 1 3
10,000-29,999 10 29
30,000-49,999 7 20
50,000-99,999 3 9
100,000-200,000 10 29
>200,000 4 11
Table VIII.
Library collections on
Islam
Library collection Frequency Percent
<10,000 5 14
10,000-29,999 20 57
30,000-49,999 3 9
50,000-99,999 4 11
100,000 3 9
Table IX.
Summary of average
collection per library
Collection nMean
Total collection 3,699,000 35 105,685.71
Collection on Islam 1,053,000 35 30,385.71
Figure 2.
Ratio between collection
on Islam and collections
other than Islam
Classification of
Islamic literature
157
Classification schemes in use
The libraries, included in the study were using various classification schemes and there
was no uniformity among the libraries in this regard. A total of 21 (60 percent) libraries
were using single scheme, whereas 14 libraries (40 percent) were using either multiple
schemes or the local expansions along with the main scheme. Of 21 libraries, using single
scheme, 13 were using Dewey Decimal Classification and eight were using indigenous
schemes for classification of materials on Islam. Four libraries were using Quaid-e-Azam
Library classification (QALC) scheme, two were using their in-house developed schemes,
one was using Shaukkat’s and another was using Shafi expansions in DDC.
The 14 (40 percent) libraries that were using multiple systems can be subdivided
into four categories. One group, comprised of five libraries was using Shafi expansions
with DDC. Second group of these libraries, two in number, was using QALC along with
DDC. Two libraries were using their own expansions with DDC. One library was using
Shaukkat expansions with DDC. One library was using more than two systems. These
systems include DDC, Shafi expansions, Gondal and Labhu Ram schemes.
The data collected from the libraries of Pakistan that have rich collections on Islam,
shows that DDC is the only standard system which is being used by these libraries.
Therefore, a brief comparison between indigenous expansions and DDC has been
presented in Figure 1. This figure shows that in the early editions of DDC (Dewey,
1951), until the 16th edition (Dewey, 1958), only one notation was given for Islam
without any further extensions and even given heading was Mohammedanism rather
than Islam. In the later editions, the heading of Islam was adopted and further
extension, standard subdivisions and number building instructions were included. In
the 21st (Dewey, 1996) and 22nd (Dewey, 2003) editions, some radical expansions
within notation 297 were made, which made the notation too lengthy. The surveyed
libraries still think these expansions are not sufficient as local schemes and expansions
have provided with more notations multiple times.
Suitability of classification systems
When the participants were asked the question whether the classification schemes
were serving the purpose of classification adequately regarding library collection on
Islam, the following was the response of those 23 who responded this question:
A dominant majority of the respondents, 20 (87 percent) was of the view that
standard classification systems did not serve the purpose of classification adequately
in library with rich collection on Islam. Two (9 percent) of them said that the standard
systems were fulfilling needs, but, sometimes they felt problems. Only one (4 percent)
said that the latest edition of DDC serves the purpose adequately. Talking about the
locally developed classification systems, six out of 15 (40 percent) said that the local
classification systems serve the purpose of classification properly, while nine (60
percent) did not agree with them as they were dissatisfied from these systems. This is
noteworthy that five out of those six who were satisfied with local systems, said that
there was a need for further work.
When the problems, shortcomings and inadequacies being faced in classification of
Islamic literature were asked the responses were as follows:
.All respondents, except one, agreed that the standard classification systems had
provided very limited and insufficient space for Islam.
.This was also agreed by all participants, except one that the topics of Islamic
studies had not been comprehensivelycovered by standard classification systems.
LR
59,3
158
.Some participants said that the devisers of standard classification systems were
biased, so they did not provide proper place to Islam in their systems.
.Some respondents were also of the view that standard classification schemes had
their own interests and they had least interest in Islamic literature, so they did
not care how much knowledge was expanding in Islamic studies and how it
should be catered in their schemes.
.The respondents also mentioned that some times, using DDC, they wanted to
include the book in Islamic collection, but, due to unavailability of number, they
were compelled to classify it in some other class.
.Participants also mentioned their concerns about lengthy notation, using DDC.
.Some of the respondents said that the devisers of standard classification systems
had such a background that they were not aware of structure, depth and variety
of Islamic knowledge. So, they could not give proper place to Islam in their
systems.
.Regarding indigenous systems, the participants said that there was no
standardization or uniformity in these systems.
.Participants also mentioned that indigenous systems had no revision policy, so
they were facing problems in classification of materials on newly evolved topics.
Solution to the problems in classification of Islam
The respondents, 35 in number, provided the following suggestions to resolve the
problems of classification of materials on Islam. Figure 3 shows the summary of
proposed solutions. Some of the participants suggested more than one option:
.A majority of the respondents (22, 63 percent) suggested that a new and
comprehensive classification scheme should be devised for Islam. While 13 (37
percent) were in the favor of amendments and expansions in either standard or
indigenous classification schemes, mainly in DDC. The breakdown of
suggestions of the participants in favor of amendments and expansions has been
given in the following lines.
.A total of 11 respondents were simply of the view that the amendments and
expansions should be made in standard classification systems.
Figure 3.
Summary of proposed
solutions for classification
of materials on Islam
Classification of
Islamic literature
159
.Three suggestions were in the favor of opting any of the local schemes or
expansions as base and more work to be done in same direction for
improvement.
.Four participants suggested for up gradation and more work on QAL scheme.
.Two were also of the view to develop a scheme locally and sending it for
inclusion in DDC in main schedule or as addenda.
.One participant proposed to form a recognized committee with the coordination
and approval of DDC, which may prepare a scheme and send it for incorporation.
Expansion, notation and placement in standard systems
The participants, who were of the view of amendments and expansions in existing
schemes were asked whether the expansion in standard classification system, i.e. DDC
as mentioned by them, should be made within originally designated notation, 297 or
some other notations, e.g. designated for Christianity should be used. Seven out of 12
participants (58 percent) suggested to use alternative notations to broaden the base,
while four (42 percent) were in favor of using the same notation. The argument in the
favor of using the same notation was to maintain uniformity worldwide. There were
some interesting arguments in the favor of alternative notations, like this practice
being a source of avoiding Muslims’ inferiority complex. The other arguments were
inclusive of providing some wideness and more accommodation and placement along
side avoiding lengthy notations.
Incorporation of amendments and expansions in DDC
When the participants were asked whether the expansions could be included and
incorporated successfully in DDC or not, the five were optimistic that DDC will accept
expansions to be incorporated. Four were pessimistic in this regard. Four thought that
the expansions could be incorporated if our viewpoint and stand would be solid and
strong. Two said they should incorporate them if they were not biased, as they claim
and preach to be. Two stated if they incorporate, well; but if they do not, no problem;
we can use them at our own in our libraries. One said that they had not incorporated
such expansions, despite the efforts in past, but, circumstances had got changed, so
they would incorporate them. One of the participants proposed to get QAL
classification scheme incorporated in DDC and if they do not do the same, it may be
published and marketed for local use. When QAL people were asked whether they
made an effort for incorporation of their scheme, their reply was, no. The reply of QAL
to the question whether they marketed their scheme, was also negative. Nevertheless,
they were open to all and whoever demanded for this scheme, they provided it to him.
Four participants mentioned different practices and being no uniformity among the
libraries to classify materials on Islam. They pointed out the need for a uniform
practice in this regard.
An independent and comprehensive scheme for Islam
In this part, the data collected on an independent and comprehensive scheme for Islam
have been analyzed.
Variety, depth and capacity of literature being produced on Islam. The question was
asked whether there was such a variety, depth and capacity in Islamic topics and the
literature was being published in such a volume that an independent classification
scheme was a realistic need of the time. A dominant majority of participants were of
LR
59,3
160
the view that there was such a variety, depth and capacity in the topics of Islamic
studies and literature was being published in such a volume that a new and
comprehensive scheme for Islam should be developed. They thought the existing
standard and local both schemes did not fulfill the needs of their collection on Islam
properly and adequately. One was of the view that the current needs were although
being fulfilled, but keeping the future needs in view, we should develop such a scheme.
Only one said that there was no need for such a scheme and current edition of DDC
fulfilled the classification needs of library materials on Islam.
Technical possibility of developing a scheme on Islam. In response to the question
whether developing an independent comprehensive scheme on Islam was possible, all
respondents replied, yes it was possible. However, two said that the process was
lengthy and would take long time.
Guiding literature for developing a scheme on Islam. All the interviewees claimed
that the literature was available. Five suggested that the guidance should be taken
from the indigenous schemes, while four said that the guidance should be taken from
standard classification systems.
Implementation of an independent scheme on Islam. In reply of a question, regarding
practical implementation of an, independent and comprehensive classification scheme
for in the presence of materials in the library on topics other than Islam, 20 participants
responded. A majority, 13 (65 percent) said that it could be done without any difficulty
as a number of libraries had already experienced a practice of multiple systems. Rest of
the respondents came with a distributed opinion. Three respondents (15 percent) said
that the implementation of such a scheme was possible, but was very difficult. Two
participants responded that such a scheme could not be implemented, so, there should
be only one scheme for a library. One respondent said that such a scheme could be
implemented easily if the notation was different from the other scheme. Another
opinion was to classify new books under this new scheme, while previous collection
may remain according to previously used system.
Who should work to devise a scheme? The participants were asked who should take
an initiative to work on the development of new, independent and comprehensive
classification scheme on Islam or making amendments and expansions in existing
standard classification systems. Seven respondents were of the view that a committee
comprising library professionals and the scholars of Islamic studies should be formed.
Six thought that professional organizations and library schools should collaborate and
form a committee for this purpose. Three said that professional organizations should
take the responsibility of this work. Three were in the favor of some individual to come
forward and take this project and complete the work. Three said that a committee
should work with coordination of Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC). Two were
in the favor of collaboration of professional organizations and government to form a
committee and provide it patronage. One said that the National Library of Pakistan
should take responsibility and work on this issue. One was of opinion that this work
should be done by library schools.
Structure of the scheme
The participants were asked about the structure of the proposed new, independent and
comprehensive scheme for materials on Islam. A majority of respondents (15 out of 21,
71 percent) was found in the favor of enumerative, where the maximum possible
subjects are included in the scheme in a pre-coordinated approach. Six (29 percent)
Classification of
Islamic literature
161
were of the view that the scheme should be faceted, where the classifier has freedom
and option of number building. The opinion of participants is shown in Figure 4.
Conclusion
The review of literature and empirical data collected for this study show that the
libraries are facing problems regarding the classification of materials where there
are rich collections on Islam. The standard classification systems have not provided
proper place and enumeration to Islamic topics in their schemes. There is no
standard or uniform practice among the libraries to classify materials on Islam.
Different libraries are using different systems, which has resulted placement of same
materials at different locations. There is no coordination among libraries having rich
collections on Islam for some common plan of action to resolve the problem in hand.
No work on automated classification has been done in Pakistan so far. This is the
area that needs to work on in the coming days. Guidance from OCLC initiatives,
Wolverhampton Web Library (WWLib) and Japanese initiative of using Nippon
decimal classification can be taken in this regard. There is a difference of opinions
among library professionals regarding the solution to the problem. Different options
to resolve the problem in hand are as follows: devising an independent and
comprehensive scheme for Islam; amendments and expansions in standard
classification schemes; and reviewing indigenous systems extensively and
developing one system based on all of them. Majority of the respondents prefer to
develop an independent and comprehensive scheme for Islam. This has been
agreed that developing a comprehensive classification scheme for Islam is
technically possible. This has also been revealed that the guiding literature for the
development of such a scheme is also available. The library schools, professional
organizations, national library of Pakistan and scholars of Islamic studies should
join their hands to proceed towards the development of a classification system for
Islam. The new scheme should comprehensively cover all the topics of literature
being produced on Islam. There should be a proper enumeration and hierarchical
relationship among topics and sub topics in this scheme. This scheme should be
revised on regular basis, so that the new developments and emerging trends would
be incorporated in this scheme. The editorial board of such a scheme should consist
of LIS professionals and scholars of Islamic studies from different countries of
Muslim World. The action plan in the broader perspective to resolve the problem
Figure 4.
Participants perception
for structure of new
scheme
LR
59,3
162
can be development of a comprehensive classification scheme for Islam as an
outcome of higher study research at first step. At the second step, the scheme can be
sent to different relevant libraries and scholars of Islamic studies to get their input.
Later, it can be presented in a national or international conference to develop a
consensus. At the third step, it can be presented to OIC to make it accepted in the
Muslim world.
References
Amazon (2008), ‘‘Books ‘Islam’: advance search’’, available at: www.amazon.com (accessed 20
March 2008).
Bajwa, R.A. (1969), ‘‘A select study of classification systems devised by Muslim Scholars’’,
unpublished Masters dissertation, Karachi University, Karachi.
Barnes and Noble (2008), ‘‘Books on Islam’’, available at: http://search.barnesandnoble.com/
booksearch/results.asp?TTL¼&ATH¼&WRD¼islam&PRC¼&FMT¼&AGE¼&CID¼
(accessed 20 March 2008).
Brill (2008), ‘‘Islam’’, available at: www.brill.nl/default.aspx?partid¼18&searchtext¼islam&
type¼1 (accessed 20 March 2008).
Broughton, V. (2000), ‘‘A new classification for the literature of religion’’, available at: www.ifla.org
(accessed 23 November 2007).
Chan, L.M. (1981), Cataloging and Classification: An Introduction, McGraw-Hill Book Company,
New York, NY.
Chishti, A.H. (1978), ‘‘Islamic libraries from 2nd century Hijri year 133 to seventh century Hijri
year 656’’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Karachi University, Karachi.
Dewey, M. (1951), Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, 15th ed., Forest Press,
New York, NY.
Dewey, M. (1958), Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, 16th ed., Forest Press,
New York, NY.
Dewey, M. (1996), Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, 21st ed., OCLC, Dublin, OH.
Dewey, M. (2003), Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, 22nd ed., OCLC, Dublin, OH.
Dickinson, A.D. (1916), The Punjab Library Primer, University of the Punjab, Laho re.
Dohaish, A.L.I. (1986), ‘‘Mosque and school libraries in early Islamic period’’, Pakistan Library
Bulletin, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 1-19 (in Urdu).
Elazar, D.H. (2000), ‘‘The making of a classification scheme for libraries of Judaica’’, available at:
www.ifla.org (accessed 23 November 2007).
Eraqi, A.T. (1985), Dewey Decimal Classification: Eslam, 2nd ed., National Library of Iran, Tehran
(in Persian).
Gacek, A. (2008), email message to authors, March.
Gondal, H.M. (n.d.), ‘‘Classification for Islam & Islamic studies’’, unpublished scheme (in Urdu).
Gorman, G.E. and Clayton, P. (2005), Qualitative Research for the Information Professional, Facet
Publishing, London.
Hassan, S.H. (1973), Decimal Classification & Library System, West Pakistan Urdu Academy,
Lahore (in Urdu).
Ibrahim, S. (1981), Dewey Decimal Classification Scheme’s Addenda for Islam, Dr Mahmood
Hussain Library, Karachi University, Karachi (in Urdu).
Ibrahim, S. (1982), Dewey’s Classification Scheme: Criticism and Suggestions, Dr Mahmood
Hussain Library, Karachi University, Karachi (in Urdu).
Classification of
Islamic literature
163
Indian Institute of Islamic Studies (1974), Library Classification Schedule on Islam and Related
Subjects, The Institute, New Delhi.
Islamic Research Institute (n.d.), unpublished classification scheme.
Khan, H. (1999), ‘‘Treatment of Pakistani topics in Dewey Decimal Classification Scheme’’,
unpublished Masters dissertation, Karachi University, Karachi.
Khan, S.A. (1963), Organization of School and College Libraries, Ferozsons, Lahore.
Khan, S.N. (2004), ‘‘Expansion of DDC 21st edition number 297.63 for the Sirah’’, Pakistan Library
& Information Science Journal, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 26-34.
Khurshid, A. (1977), Shafi Dewey Decimal Expansions for Islam: An Introduction, Royal Book
Company, Karachi (in Urdu).
Khurshid, A. (1980), ‘‘Developments in cataloging and classification in Pakistan’’, in Aman, M.M.
(Ed.), Cataloguing and Classification of Non-Western Material: Concerns, Issues and
Practices, Oryx Press, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 253-7.
King Abdul Aziz University (1977), Al-Tasnif al-Ashri, The University, Jeddah.
McGill University and Weryho, J.W. (1979), Smith Islamic Classification in Use at McGill,
University Islamic Studies Library, Montre
´al.
Mitchell, J.S. (2005), ‘‘Options in religion: survey results’’, available at: www.oclc.org (accessed 13
November 2007).
Morgan, C.B. (1996), ‘‘Cultural and religious problems in Dewey Decimal Classification’’, available
at: http://home.usit/%7Ecbmorgan/index.htm (accessed 23 November 2007).
Powell, R.R. and Connaway, L.S. (2004), Basic Research Methods for Librarians, Libraries
Unlimited, London.
Qaisar, S.M.H. (1974), Islamic Sciences: Expansion of Dewey Decimal Classification Ed. XVI, for
Oriental Libraries, Institute of Islamic Studies, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh.
Quaid-e-Azam Library (n.d.), unpublished classification scheme for Islamic materials, literature,
regional literature, Pakistan, etc.
Ram, L. (n.d.), ‘‘Punjab university library classification scheme’’, unpublished scheme.
Rehman, M.U., Nizami, N.H. and Shaikh, S. (2003), Super Classification System, The Authors,
Karachi.
Riazuddin, S. (1993), Classification, (Urdu), Muqtadara Qaumi Zuban, Islamabad.
Riazuddin, S. (2002), Classification of Islamic Literature, Royal Book Company, Karachi.
Rizwi, S.J.A. (1975), ‘‘A comparative analysis of classification of Islam’’, unpublished research
report for partial fulfillment of an MA course, University of the Punjab, Lahore, p. 239
(in Urdu).
Rizwi, S.J.A. (1996), ‘‘Classification expansions’’, in Anwarulhaq (Ed.), Classification and
Cataloguing, Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, pp. 159-214 (in Urdu).
Sabzwari, G.A. (1981), ‘‘Dewey 19 in Pakistan’s perspective’’, Pakistan Library Bulletin, Vol. 12
No. 2, pp. 9-18.
Sabzwari, G.A. (1982), ‘‘Universal Islamic classification’’, Pakistan Library Bulletin, Vol. 13 No. 2,
pp. 1-20.
Sabzwari, G.A. (2007), Classification: Eastern Philosophy,Islam, Alsunna Sharqiya, Pakistan,
Vol. 2, 2nd ed., Library Promotion Bureau, Karachi (in Urdu).
Sardar, Z. (1979), Islam: Outline of a Classification Scheme, C. Bingley, London.
Shafi, M. (1962), ‘‘Expansions of Dewey decimal classification relating to Oriental, Islamic and
Pakistani topics’’, Pakistan Library Review, Vol. 4 No. 1-2, pp. 42-88.
LR
59,3
164
Shaniti, M. (1960), ‘‘Abridged decimal classification scheme’’, unpublished doctoral dissertation,
Cairo University, Cairo (in Arabic).
Shaukkat, A. (1970), Nizam-e-Kutub Khana, Sheikh Ghulam Ali & Sons, Lahore (in Urdu).
Siddiqui, S. (1986), Our Religious Libraries, Quaid-e-Azam Library, Lahore (in Urdu).
TEBROC Cataloguing Department (1971), Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index,
Institute for Research and Planning in Science and Education, Tehran.
Usmani, M.A. (1982), ‘‘Classification system for Islamic literature and Muslim countries’’,
Editorial, Pakistan Library Bulletin, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. i-vi.
Corresponding author
Haroon Idrees can be contacted at: h.haroonidrees@gmail.com
To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: reprints@emeraldinsight.com
Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints
... Classification is the process that categorizes the information on the basis of its degree of similarity and places this categorized information in a logical manner (Stevenson, 2006). "Classification plays a significant role in the organization, physical arrangement, access and retrieval of the library materials" (Idrees and Mahmood, 2010). The diversity in information resources about different topics and in multiple formats is organized through some sort of classification system. ...
... These schemes are regularly revised and updated and make space for the adjustment of new emerging subjects of knowledge (Samdani, 1997). As most of the libraries in the Eastern world, especially Pakistan, used the DDC scheme for the organization of resources, so numerous efforts were made for the organization of oriental literature, especially Islamic literature, by expanding Dewey's classes as well as developing other schemes (Idrees and Mahmood, 2010). ...
... Despite worldwide usefulness, both schemes are not convenient for the organization of Islamic literature (Usmani, 1982). The space provided in Dewey's scheme is insufficient, inadequate and sometimes illogical for the classification of the oriental literature, and this scheme does not provide the complete solution for the organization of narrower subjects of Islam and religions other than Christianity (Idrees and Mahmood, 2010). ...
Article
Purpose Deeni Madaris of Pakistan and their libraries are playing an important role in educating the large fraction of society. They have always been engaged in the development of social and cultural values of the Pakistani society. This study investigated the organization of information resources and their utilization at Deeni Madaris libraries in the central Punjab, Pakistan Design/methodology/approach Quantitative research approach was adopted for this study. A questionnaire was developed on the bases of related literature and discussions with experts of librarianship as well as Islamic studies in Pakistan. Questionnaire was sent to 49 Deeni Madaris libraries. Out of 49, five Deeni Madaris did not have libraries and four did not respond. Forty (81.6%) Deeni Madaris responded and provided the relevant data about their libraries. The collected data was analyzed through SPSS 22. Mostly descriptive statistics were applied to calculate the frequencies, percentage, means and standard deviations. 2-tailed t-test was applied to check the impact of cataloguing and automation on the use of information resources. Findings It was found that majority of the respondents developed their own classification and cataloguing methods for the organization of information resources and did not have proper retrieval system. Majority of the respondents were providing lending services to readers. Teachers and final year students were the key users of the libraries. They were mostly interested to consult books, theses, and serials written in Urdu and Arabic language. The situation of library computerization was very weak; only 19 libraries had computers and 11 of them have partially automated the library activities. Library automation and catalogue put positive effects on the use of library resources Originality/value The exploration of the literature showed that libraries of Madaris in Pakistan had always remained priority, but these libraries did not get position in the library literature as they deserve. This study will fill this gap.
... When it comes to the preservation and transmission of human knowledge from one race to another and from one community to another, the library is an organization that has played a critical role in this process. Libraries collect various items, process them, arrange them, and make them readily available to library patrons at their convenience, as described above (Idrees & Mahmood, 2010). A remarkably rapid transformation when you consider that library 3.0 is being gradually incorporated in libraries all across the world. ...
... Perhaps they were not aware of the extent and breadth of the expansion of Islamic knowledge and the wide range of themes and resources that were being developed. Perhaps they did not anticipate that their systems would spread throughout the world or that such a diverse range of libraries from all over the world would use these schemes at some point in the future when they developed them (Idrees, 2013;Idrees & Mahmood, 2010). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study was conducted to review the perception of Islamic libraries in Indonesia within the scope of Islamic economics in terms of scientific research in published journals that discuss the development of Islamic libraries. The method used is descriptive statistical analysis with meta-analysis and sentiment analysis from secondary data in the form of 43 published and Scopus-indexed papers in the last 32 years, then processed using Microsoft Excel 2016 software and SentiStrength. The results show that research on Islamic libraries in the scientific literature has increased. The sentiment analysis results show a tendency for good perceptions in the scientific literature of the existence of Islamic libraries, with the high positive sentiment of 5%, positive at 47%, then neutral sentiment at 43% and the remaining negative sentiment at 5%. This research is the first to discuss the sentiment analysis of Islamic library theme research with primary data.
... which has been adapted from Idrees &Mahmood (2010), shows that in the early editions of DDC (1951), until the 16th edition (1958), only one notation was given for Islam without any of its further extensions. This is also notable that the given heading was Mohammedanism until the 15th edition, rather than Islam. ...
... A blend of purposive and convenient sampling technique was initially used as referred by Gorman & Clayton (2005), but at the later stage, some more subjects were included through snowball sampling. These sampling techniques were suitable due to clear purpose in mind based on the previous study that the researcher had con-ducted and results of which had been published, stratified nature of population, homogeneity in population, and typical cases (Idrees & Mahmood, 2009;Idrees, 2010;and Idrees & Mahmood, 2010 Initially a sample of 40 participants, counting 25 librarians and 15 scholars from library and information science was selected. Later, some more participants were included in the study using snowball sampling technique. ...
Thesis
Full-text available
The Libraries that have rich collections on Islam are facing the problems of knowledge organization while classifying materials on Islam. This is because the standard classification systems like Dewey Decimal Classification, Library of Congress Classification, Universal Decimal Classification, Bliss Classification, and Colon Classification, which are used by a huge number of libraries, have not provided with sufficient place and proper enumeration or hierarchy for Islamic knowledge. Subsequently, different alternative solutions have been sorted by scholars and opted by these libraries. These solutions include expansions made in standard classification systems with different approaches and indigenous classification systems for Islam. Despite these solutions, the libraries had problems and were not satisfied. This study has addressed this problem, reviewing literature on the problem and collecting empirical data from relevant libraries and scholars of Library and Information Science (LIS) from nine different countries of the world, using interviewing as data collection instrument. This population represented a global view on the problem. Findings of literature and empirical data both confirmed the existence of the problem of dissatisfaction in the perspective libraries. Consequently, the optimal solution indicated in literature and by sampled population has been brought forward in this research, i.e., development of an independent and comprehensive classification system for Islamic knowledge. This system has been validated and verified by the scholars of LIS and of Islamic Studies, most of them having expertise in both fields, i.e. Islamic Studies and LIS. This system is considered as a model classification system for Islamic knowledge with a wide possibility and potential of further expansion.
... According to Idrees and Mahmood (2010) DDC is the only standard classification system that is being used in Pakistani libraries with rich collections on Islam. The same is the case with other Muslim countries, as mentioned by Sabzwari (1982). ...
... The same is the case with other Muslim countries, as mentioned by Sabzwari (1982). Keeping this fact in mind, a brief comparison between indigenous expansions and DDC, along with a picture of historical developments in different editions of DDC regarding Islam, is presented in Figure 2. Figure 2, which has been adapted from Idrees and Mahmood (2010), shows that in the early editions of DDC (Dewey, 1951) until the 16th edition (Dewey, 1958), only one notation was given for Islam without any of its further extensions. It is also notable that the given heading was "Mohammedanism" until the 15th edition, rather than "Islam". ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop understanding of the problems of classification, to discover the classification practices of libraries with rich collections on Islam cited in the literature, to find the gaps, and to determine the point from which to start work on further development. Design/methodology/approach Published and unpublished literature, both print and electronic, that is relevant to the problem was reviewed objectively in the compilation of this paper. Findings Standard classification systems lack proper space for materials on Islam for two reasons: less awareness on the part of devisers of the depth and variety of Islamic topics; and their bias and lack of interest in Islam. Different indigenous classification systems and expansions have been developed, using either the original notation or alternative notations. Some systems have been developed without following any standards or logic. This study has revealed a need for empirical study of libraries with rich collections on Islam in order to gain a better understanding of the problem and find an optimal solution. Research limitations/implications No empirical field data are included in this study. This is a review of the literature. Originality/value The author indicates the current situation of the problem and a potential framework for its solution.
... To improve users' satisfaction, the authors proposed amendments and expansions in standard classification schemes, devising an independent and comprehensive scheme for Islam, and reviewing indigenous systems. In the second study (Idrees and Mahmood, 2010), the authors review Islamic literature and also conducted an interview about Islamic collections in Pakistan. Results of the study indicated a lack of a proper classification of Islamic topics, a lack of standard or uniform practices in classifying Islamic literature, and a lack of coordination and research sharing among Islamic libraries. ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to investigate and understand the perceptions of faculty members and students toward Islamic and law information resources and services. The paper explored the perceptions of respondents’ toward library buildings and facilities, availability of references, provision of reference services, and digital information resources and services. A survey questionnaire was used for data collection. Respondents expressed positive perceptions toward the provision of Islamic and law information resources and services. The findings of the study supported two of the eight hypotheses and suggested the impact of respondents’ status on the perceived library buildings and facilities, and perceived reference services. Interestingly, gender analysis suggested no relationship with the perceived library buildings and facilities, perceived references, perceived reference services, and perceived digital resources and services.
... This is the case with majority of Muslim countries (Sabzwari, 1982). Keeping this fact in mind, a brief comparison between indigenous expansions and DDC along with a picture of historical developments in different editions of DDC regarding Islam has been shown inFigure 1 (adapted from Idrees and Mahmood (2010). This shows that in the early editions of DDC until the 16th edition (1958), only one notation was given for Islam without further extension. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose - Developing an understanding and finding the ways for an optimal solution of the problem of organizing Islamic knowledge being faced in the libraries with rich collections on Islam. Design/methodology/approach - Qualitative methods of research have been opted for the study. Relevant literature has been reviewed. 16 scholars from the field of Library and Information Science (LIS) residing and serving nine countries have been interviewed using a semi structured interview schedule. Findings - Libraries with rich collections of Islamic knowledge are facing problems while using different standard classification systems, indigenous expansions in these systems and independent indigenous systems. A new and comprehensive enumerative classification system for Islamic knowledge, validated by experts of LIS and Islamic studies has been recommended by the population as an optimal solution to the problem. Developing such a system is a real need and call of the time, it is a viable project, and guiding literature is also available in the opinion of majority of population. Research limitations/implications - This study does not include automatic classification solutions because the main portion of the libraries from relevant population is still not very well abreast with such solutions and are using classical sources. Originality/value - This study examines the problem of organizing rich collections on Islam in libraries and presents a potential solution in the light of opinions of 16 LIS scholars serving in different parts of the world.
... 34 Idrees and Mahmood determined that DDC is the only standard classification system being used in Pakistani libraries that have rich collections on Islam. 35 According to Sabzwari, the situation is the same in other Muslim countries. 36 The multitude of approaches to classifying Islamic materials described above make clear that many have sought to address the problems. ...
Article
Full-text available
Standard library classification systems like Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), American Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) are internationally known and widely used by libraries as the tools for the organization of information. Charles Ammi Cutter’s Expansive Classification (EC), Subject Classification (SC) of James Duff Brown, Henry E. Bliss’ Bibliographic Classification (BC) and S. R. Ranganathan’s Colon Classification (CC) also are known as standard classification systems, but are less commonly used compared to aforementioned three systems. All these systems are easy to use and convenient for most of the general collection libraries. However, these systems are not adequate for some of the particular special collections. The libraries that have rich collections on Islam also face problems while using these systems, although such libraries often use expansions in the original systems for such collections. This paper examines this problem and presents a potential optimal solution. Data have been collected, using a semi-structured interview technique, from a representative sample of thirty libraries with strong collections in Islam in eight countries. These date were analysed employing qualitative methods.
Article
Full-text available
This paper presents bio-bibliometric analysis of the contributions of Dr. Khalid Mahmood in the field of Library and Information Science through his publications. The analysis includes geographical and year wise distribution of publications; collaboration for publication; publications by type; language and journal preferences for the publication; and coverage of different subject areas. Results of the study indicate that Dr. Khalid Mahmood is a prolific writer in the field of library and information science. He contributed 115 items including 99 articles, six books, eight conference papers and two papers in newsletters till December 31, 2011. Research work by Dr. Khalid Mahmood is well accepted in developed countries like United Kingdom and United States of America. He used English language to disseminate majority of his research work. He believes in teamwork and about two third of his research work was result of collaboration.
Article
Full-text available
Libraries deal with recorded knowledge. Classification systems play a fundamental role in the organization, display, retrieval and access of the knowledge and materials in libraries. During the last one and a half century, formal classification systems and standards have been developed to replace the previous generic categorization. Such the systems are very famous, known and used by the libraries internationally. Some of these international standard systems include: Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC); Charles Ammi Cutter’s Expansive Classification (EC); The Subject Classification of James Duff Brown (SC); American Library of Congress Classification (LCC); Universal Decimal Classification (UDC): Henry E. Bliss’ Bibliographic Classification (BC); and S. R. Ranganathan’s Colon Classification (CC). These systems have served the purpose adequately in many of the knowledge areas and disciplines. Nevertheless, there are some of the areas which lack proper intention and treatment in these fit-for-all standard classification systems. The background and context of the devisers has been a strong reason behind this problem. Islamic knowledge is also among the areas, which has not been properly addressed by these systems. This paper examines this problem and presents a potential solution for the problem.
Article
Full-text available
This paper describes the history of A Classification System for Libraries of Judaica, its development, the process involved in preparing the second and third revisions, and its use in various libraries.The authors of the scheme contend that there was-and is-a need for a classification system for libraries of Judaica to classify and arrange their collections according to Jewish concepts based upon Jewish thought and terminology.
Book
The fourth edition of the late Lois Mai Chan's classic Cataloging and Classification covers the analysis and representation of methods used in describing, organizing, and providing access to resources made available in or through libraries. Since the last edition published in 2007, there have been dramatic changes in cataloging systems from the Library of Congress. The most notable being the shift from AACR2 to Resource Description and Access (RDA) as the new standard developed by the Library of Congress. With the help of the coauthor, Athena Salaba, this text is modified throughout to conform to the new standard. Retaining the overall outline of the previous edition, this text presents the essence of library cataloging and classification in terms of three basic functions: descriptive cataloging, subject access, and classification. Within this framework, all chapters have been rewritten to incorporate the changes that have occurred during the interval between the third and fourth editions. In each part, the historical development and underlying principles of the retrieval mechanism at issue are treated first, because these are considered essential to an understanding of cataloging and classification. Discussion and examples of provisions in the standards and tools are then presented in order to illustrate the operations covered in each chapter. Divided into five parts—a general overview; record production and structure, encoding formats, and metadata records; RDA; subject access and controlled vocabularies; and the organization of library resources—each part of the book begins with a list of the standards and tools used in the preparation and processing of that part of the cataloging record covered, followed by suggested background readings selected to help the reader gain an overview of the subject to be presented. This book is the standard text for the teaching and understanding of cataloging and classification
Article
Qualitative Research for the Information Professional - by G. E. Gorman December 2004
Article
Billions of words and thousands of books and other written material are being printed and produced every minute in the world. The Librarian are directly involved in facing these challenges and helping their scholars and intellectuals to go along with the developments. They have to keep in eye on all the printed and non-printed materials. They have to acquire, organize and retrieve appropriate material and information for the persons doing research. To provide efficient and satisfactory service they have to organize this material on some fool proof system. The systems are numerous and they have to choose the best on which may help in enlightening, enriching and accelerating the educational and research activities of the people. The difficulties in the classification schemes prompted many Librarians in the East either to make certain adjustments and alterations OR to make expansions in the existing numbers provided for subjects of vital interest to their libraries. This has lead to many new expansions but almost all of them independent of each other in their approach.
Article
The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system is a logical approach to a hierarchical categorization of recorded knowledge that makes sense to many people. It both illustrates classification theory and provides a practical way to organize information. It is taught in several different settings with content relying upon the purpose of the education or training. With reference to communications from colleagues, the author identifies some problems in teaching DDC, followed by some of the content covered and some methodologies used to overcome the problems. Several examples of teaching tools are included as appendices.