ArticlePDF Available

Antibiotics in aquaculture: An overview

Authors:
1
SouthAsianJExpBiol;1(3):xxxxxx;2011
ISSN:22309799 Vol.1,Issue3,Pagexxxxxxhttp://www.sajeb.org
REGULARARTICLE
Antibioticsinaquaculture:Anoverview
R.Vignesha*,B.S.Karthikeyanb,N.PeriyasamyaandK.Devanathana
aCentreforAdvancedStudyinMarineBiology,FacultyofMarineSciences,AnnamalaiUniversity,Parangipettai
608502,Tamilnadu,India
bDepartmentofBioinformatics,SchoolofLifeSciences,BharathidasanUniversity,Tiruchirapalli620024,Tamilnadu,
India
ARTICLEINFO
ArticleHistory:
Received:24052011
Revised:04062011
Accepted:08062011
*CorrespondingAuthor:
Email:vignesh144@gmail.com
Keywords:Antibiotics,Pollutants,
Aquaculture,Impacts,Ecosystems,
HumanHealth
ABSTRACT
Thepresenceofantibioticcompoundsinterrestrialandaquaticenvironment
isofhigherinterestworldwideduetotheemergenceasdangerouspollut
antsoftheenvironmentandtothehumanhealth.Fishandshrimpaquacul
tureisrecognizedasanimportantlivelihood,whichhasgoodeconomicre
turns.Thusvastarraysofantibioticsareappliedtotheaquacultureinabe
liefthatitwillenhancetheproductionandalsoinahopethatitwillimprove
thesocioeconomicprofileindevelopingcountries.Butthebaneofantibiot
icstothemarineandotheraquaticecosystemsisnotconsideredtoalarger
extent.Theaccessibilityofthegreatnumberofantibiotics,alreadystandard
forhumanuse,makesthemaprecioussourcefortreatmentofother,than
infectious,diseasesinhumansandanimals.Thisreviewpaperhighlightsthe
usageofantibioticsandtheirimpactsinaquacultureenvironment.
1.Introduction
Inmanycountriesaquacultureisamajorthrust
areawhichplaysvitalroleinimprovingcommunity
progress,foodsecurity,povertymitigation,em
ploymentandothereconomicactivities.World
wideproductionoffarmedaquaticanimalsand
plantshastobereachedtoseveralbillionsaccord
ingtotheFoodandAgriculturalOrganization
(FAO).Ashumanpopulationgrows,thedemand
andneedforfishwillgrowflankingit(FAO,2007).
Despitedevelopmentsinfishingtechnology,the
demandforfishwillalmostcertainlyexceedsus
tainablelevels.Aquacultureispoisedtofillthegap
betweenfishneedsandsustainablefishingand
needtobescalabletomeetfuturedemands(FAO,
2007).
India,acountrywithanareaof3.3millionsqkm
andapopulationofabout1.21billionpeopleis
artisticwithrichfreshwater,brackishwaterand
marineresources.Thecountryproducesabout5
millionmtoffishinwhichtotalaquaculturepro
ductionisabout1.6millionmt(FAO,2007).Aqua
cultureproductionhasincreasedthreetimesdur
ingthelasttenyears.Althoughaquaculturehas
madeverygoodprogressinthelastfivedecades,it
isstillaverysmallsubsectorofagriculture.Consid
eringthecountry’svastprospectiveforaquacul
ture(bothfreshwaterandcoastal),therecent
achievementsbyR&Donvariousaspectsofaqua
culture,inadditionwiththepublicandprivatesec
torsprospectaquaculturewithanoptimisticeco
nomicactivity.
2
Vigneshetal.,SouthAsianJExpBiol;1(3):xxxxxx;2011
Duringthelasttwothreedecades,therewasmas
sivegrowthoffishandshrimpculturingwhichobvi
ouslyimprovedcountry’sexportvalueandalsohas
unfortunatelyresultedinharmfulenvironmental
impacts.Theaccomplishmentinthemassproduc
tionofhatcherybredshrimpsandfishesalsolead
theroadtowardsinventionofadvancedculture
techniquestomeetitsdemand.Withthehelpof
advancedculturetechniquesevenwithlowinvest
menthighyieldwasobtained.Thisgrowthinvited
multinationalcompaniestoinitializebusinessand
theyestablishedtheircompaniesincoastaland
agriculturallandsinthe1990s.Themajoraquacul
tureshrimpproducingregionsandtheprogressin
aquacultureproductionofshrimpsinAsiafrom
2003‐2011isshowninTable1andTable2.Asa
sourceoflivelihoodcapturefisheriesandaquacul
tureemployed43.5millionpeoplein2006.Many
countriesareinvestingheavilyintheaquaculture
sectorexpectingthefuturedemandforhighquality
seafoodwillbemetbyfarmedfish(FAO2009).
Aquacultureiswidelyusedasanimportantweapon
intheglobalfightagainstmalnutritionandpoverty,
particularlywithindevelopingcountrieswhereover
93%ofglobalproductioniscurrentlyproduced,pro
vidinginmostinstancesanaffordableandmuch
neededsourceofhighqualityanimalprotein,lipids
andotheressentialnutrients.(Alberttaconetal.,
2010).
2.AntibioticsandAquaculture
Alongwiththedevelopmentofaquaculture,dis
easescausedbyvariousetiologicalagentsfollowed
bymortalityofculturedstockhavebecomelimiting
factorsinproduction.Hence,thefarmersandthe
hatcheryoperatorshaveresortedtotheuseof
variousremedialmeasures,includinguseofantim
icrobialsanddrugsforcontrollingthedisease.The
frequencyofutilizingtheseantibioticsandother
chemicalsismoreinhatcheriesandscientificfarms
thanintraditionalfarms.
Amongthedrugsemployedinagriculture,antibiot
icsarethemostwidelyusedforanimalhealthand
management(Levey,1992).Accordancewitha
2008amendmenttotheAnimalDrugUserFeeAct,
theU.S.FoodandDrugAdministration(FDA)re
leasedanannualamountofantimicrobialdrugs
soldanddistributedforuseinfoodanimals.The
grandtotalfor2009is13.1millionkilogramsor
28.8millionpounds(USFDA,2008).Thetotal
amountofveterinaryantibioticsusedintherapeu
ticpurposesandasfeedingadditiveswereapproxi
mately1000tonsand500tonsin2005(KFDA,
2005).Theuseofantimicrobialsinaquacultureba
sicallystartedwiththeworkofGutsell(1946)who
recognizedtheprospectiveuseofantibiotics
(sulphanamidesforcombatingfurunculosis).Ac
cordingtoKummerer(2009a)antibioticsarenatu
rallyoccurringmanmadechemicalsthatcanbe
dividedintodifferentclassessuchasβ
lactams,
quinolonestetracyclines,macrolidsandsulfona
mides.Morenumberofantibioticslikechloram
phenicol,oxyteteracycline,kanamycin,nifurprazine,
Country200320042005200620072008200920102011
South
eastAsia
857,229993,5651,150,7141,333,6691,353,5541,382,6931,347,6981,362,4161,444,896
China789,373935,9441,064,9491,080,4791,265,6361,268,0741,252,7411,365,0691,512,877
India/
Bangla
desh
169,743191,064206,222209,047171,265291,890289,750331,250360,000
Americas296,461326,266379,363446,471449,099470,717495,033501,917523,550
Africa/
Mideast
25,25725,50026,77127,79026,64128,41028,25031,50038,500
Others7,7037,5859,96811,7519,50114,00015,00016,00016,000
Table1:Shrimpaquacultureproductionbymajorproducingregions(mt).
Sources:20032007,FAO(2009);20082011,GOALestimate(Jory,2010).
Country200320042005200620072008200920102011
China789,373935,9441,064,9491,242,3851,265,6361,268,0741,252,7411,365,0691,512,877
Thailand330,725360,292401,251500,800501,200473,622455,000420,000420,000
Vietnam231,717275,569327,200349,000376,700391,000418,148429,616475,946
Indonesia191,148238,567279,539339,803330,155315,050250,000275,000302,000
India113,240133,020143,170144,347107,665126,042106,000125,000135,000
Bangladesh56,50358,04463,05264,70063,600165,848183,750206,250225,000
Table2:ShrimpaquacultureproductioninAsia(mt).
Sources:20032007,FAO(2009);20082011,GOALestimate(Jory,2010).
3
Vigneshetal.,SouthAsianJExpBiol;1(3):xxxxxx;2011
oxolinicacid,flumequin,ciproflaxinandothers
wereintroduced(AustinandAustin,1993).Later
theseantibioticswerefurtherclassifiedasantibac
terials,antivirals,antifungal,antiprotozoan,anti
metazoanpreparations,probiotics,immunostimu
lants,vaccines,bactecins,hormones,growthstimu
lants,anestheticsandbioremediatorsforbothbio
augmentorsandbiostimulators.
3.ImpactsofAntibiotics
Antibioticsaredesignedtoinhibitthegrowthand
tokillpathogenicbacteria.Theygenerallyactin
oneofthethreeways:Bydisruptingcellmem
branes,bydisruptingproteinorDNAsynthesisor
byinhibitingenzymeactivity.Compoundswithan
tibioticactivityareselectedforuseinhumanand
veterinarymedicinebecauseoftheirselectivetox
icitytocellmembranes,ribosomalactivityoren
zymeactivityinprokaryoticcells.Despitetheirlow
toxicity,therearesignificantenvironmentalcon
cernswithwidespreaduseofantibiotics.Manyan
tibioticsarestablechemicalcompoundsthatare
notbrokendowninthebody,butremainactive
longafterbeingexcreted.Atpresent,antibiotics
makeaconsiderablecontributiontothegrowing
problemofactivemedicalsubstancescirculatingin
theenvironment.Thecommonpracticesthatoccur
inthefishindustry,particularlyindevelopingcoun
tries,wherelargeamountsofantibioticsareused
toavoidinfection.(Cabelloetal.,2006).
Thecontinuousandheavyuseofantibioticsinthe
aquacultureenvironmentscouldleadtovarious
hazardswithconcerntothehealthofaquaticor
ganismsaswellastothehumansonconsumption
offishesandshrimps.Theantibioticsusedinaqua
culture,eitherforprophylacticorremedialpur
posesoftenmountupinthetissueofaquaticani
mals.Presenceofantimicrobialdrugresiduesin
theedibletissuescancauseallergies,toxiceffects,
changesintheintestinalmicrobialfaunaandacqui
sitionofdrugresistance.Remainsofchlorampheni
colinfoodconsumedbyhumanscanevenresultin
aplasticanemia,whichleadstoverybrutalbone
marrowdiseases.Nitrofuranantibioticsareknown
tocausecancerandsomanyotherdiseases.
Antibioticscanevenbeconsideredasamajorfac
torthatisresponsibleforaffectingthemicrobial
communityintheenvironment.Butthestudieson
theantibioticsanditseffectsonaquaticfarmsare
lessandthereasonforthisobservablefactisvery
wellexplainedbyKummerrer(2009b),whostated
thattheconcentrationofantibioticswereinmono
gramsandlowermicrogramsperlitersrangeand
thislowerconcentrationmakesitdifficulttostudy
theeffects.Alsothemicrobesarepresentinmuch
lowerdensitieswhichmakefurthercomplications
indeterminingthemicrobialcommunitystructure.
Antibioticsactasanecologicalbarrierintheenvi
ronmentthatcouldpotentiallyaffectmicrobial
communities.TheeffectsincludePhylogenetic
structurealteration,resistanceexpansionandeco
logicalfunctiondisturbanceinthemicroecosystem
(ChanDing,2010).
Antibioticswhichhaveanaffinityforabsorbing
ontoaparticulatematter,especiallyinthemarine
environmentmaypersistandremainactivefor
muchlongerintheenvironment(HallingSorenson
etal.,1998).Anoxicsedimentsarecommoninthe
aquaticenvironmentandmostantibioticcom
poundspersistmuchlongerintheseanoxiccondi
tions.Hektoenetal.(1995)showedthatantibiotics
buriedinsedimentsasshallowas17cmhavehalf
livesofmorethan300days.Thisemphasizesthat
theantibioticscanbuildupintheaquaticenviron
menttodangerouslevelsthatmayeffectbenthic
communitiesandcontinueupthroughthefood
chain.
Researchhasprovedthatmanychemicalsmanu
facturedandusedtodayentertheenvironment,
disperseandpersistintheenvironmentformuch
longeroriginallyexpected(Kolpin,2002).Theusage
ofantibioticsinthefishandshrimpaquaculture
hasbecomeamajorproblemwhichseepages
throughpondbottomanddischargesaswastesand
effluentsmixingintorunoffwaterandcovering
coastalmangrovesdestroyingimportantnatural
habitatsforshrimps,fishesandtohumans
(Jatindraetal.,2009).Thestudiesoffishfarms
haveshownthatthemajorityofantibioticsadded
infeedarenotassimilatedbyfishbutgointothe
environments(Weston,1996).LeandMunekage
(2004)alsoreportedthatantibioticsresiduesmay
causeharmfuleffectonecosystems.Thustheaccu
mulationoftheseantibioticsinsedimentswilldefi
nitelyalterthenaturalfunctionsthatmighttake
placeintheenvironment.Itisforthisreason,that
mostoftheimportingcountrieshavecompletely
bannedtheuseofcertainantibiotics.Thelistof
bannedantibioticsbymarineproductsexportde
velopmentauthorityofIndia(MPEDA)isgivenin
Table3.
Inhatcheries,itisthecommonpracticetouseanti
bioticsasaprophylactic/therapeutic,measurees
4
Vigneshetal.,SouthAsianJExpBiol;1(3):xxxxxx;2011
peciallywhenlarvaldevelopmentishindered.This
isalsomeanttotreatthemicrobialinfectionsin
storedwaterinhatcherytanks,whilelarvaland
postlarvaldevelopmentcontinues.Thepractice
canbereplacedbyusingprobiotics(helpfulmi
crobes).Enrichmentoflivelarvalfeedswithantibi
oticstoenhancequality(bioencapsulation)can
alsoleadtoilleffectsofantibioticsuse.Allthese
measureswillleaveantibioticresidueinthecul
turedstock.Thustheapplicationofantibioticsand
otherchemicalsintheaquaculturefarmsto
achievehighproductioncauseddiseaseproblems
andcoastalenvironmentalpollution.
4.Antibioticresistance
Theaquaticenvironmenthasmoredirectandinti
matecontactwithhumanlifeduetothewidecon
sumptionoffishandshrimps.Thusitmaytransfer
antibioticresistanceposingthreattopublichealth
andecosystems.Theantibioticsusedareoftennon
biodegradableandremainintheaquacultureenvi
ronmentforlongperiodsoftime.Thisencourages
thegrowthofbacteria,whichcansurviveinthe
presenceoftheseantibiotics,acquiringaresistance
thatispassedontoconsequentgenerations.The
dangeris,thesebacteriacanbetransferredtohu
manandanimalpathogens,leadingtoincreased
infectiousdiseaseinfish,animalsandhumans
alike.
Antibioticusagehasreceivedalotattentioninthe
mediaforthepastfewyearsduetotheincreasing
numberofdiseasesbecomingresistanttotradi
tionaltreatments.Thecontinuousandindiscrimi
nateusageofantibioticsintheaquaculturefarms
hasledveryseriousconsequences.Itpavedwayfor
theoutbreakofmutagenic,multidrugresistantmi
crobialstrainswhichcancauseinfectiousdiseases.
Marinefishfarmsaresurroundedbyawiderange
ofmarineecosystemlikefishing,andothermarine
foodprocessingunits.Someofthewildfishesfeed
fromleftoverfoodpelletswhicharemedicated
withantibioticsandobviouslyitpassestothe
fishesandaresearchhasconfirmedthatwildfishes
capturearoundaquacultureareasingestthepel
lets.Residuesoftetracyclineandquinoloneswere
reportedinwildfishescapturedintheseaquacul
tureareas(Tendenciaetal.,2001).Apartfrom
antibioticresistance,theseantibioticsgetaccumu
latedinthetissuesofthefishesandshrimps.
Theevolutionofresistanceisaninevitableconse
quenceofantibioticuse(Stokes,2001)andthis
consequenceisperhapsthemostimportantimpli
cationofantibioticuseinaquacultureforavariety
ofreason(Salyersetal.,2002).TheuseofOxytet
racycline(OTC)inaquaculturehasbeenshownto
causeaseasonalshiftinbacterialspeciestowards
enterobacteriaceaeandisassociatedwithantibi
oticresistance(Guardabaasietal.,1999;Wollen
bergeretal.,2000)samplestakenfromgillsand
intestinesofwildandcommercialfishescaptured
nearfishfarmingactivitieshaveshownhighfre
quenciesofmultipleantibioticresistance(Rhodes
etal2000,Guardabassietal.,1999).Alsotheresis
tantstrainsofbacteriarequireevenhigherlevelsof
dosingtotreatdiseasesleadingtomoreantibiotic
reachingthenaturalenvironment(Bruunetal.,
2003).
Thescientificevidenceisthatuseofantibioticsin
foodproducinganimalscanleadtoresistancein
intestinalbacteriaandthisresistancecanthenbe
transmittedtothegeneralpopulationcausing
treatment‐resistantillness.Infishfarmingaquacul
turemariculturethewidespreaduseofantibiotics
fortreatingbacterialdiseaseshasbeenassociated
withthedevelopmentofantibioticsresistancein
Aeromonashydrophila,A.salomonicida,Edward
siellatarda,E.icttaluri,Vibrioanguillarum,
V.salmonicida,Pasteurellapiscida(Hernandezser
vanop,2005).
Thegeneralpremiseofmanystudiesexamining
resistanceisthatasmoreantibioticisintroduced
intotheenvironmentthegreaterwillbetheinci
denceofantibioticresistanceinthebacterialflora
(Smithetal.,1994a;Hallingsorensonetal.,
1998).Whenantibioticsarepresent,resistant
strainshaveanadvantageovernon‐ resistant
strainsandpredominateinthepopulation.Antibi
oticresistancebacteriaandtheirresistancegenes
areoftendetectedinaquaticecosystems(Esiobuet
1 Chloramphenicol 11 Dimetridazole
2 Nitrofurans 12 Metronidazole
3 Neomycin 13 Onidazole
4 NalidixicAcid 14 Ipronidazole
5 Sulphamethoxazole 15 Nitroimidazoles
6 Aristolochia 16 Clenbuterol
7 Chlorprpmazine 17 Diethylstilbestrol
8 Colchicine 18 Sulfonamide
9 Apsone 19 Floroquinolones
10 Chloroform 20 Glycopeptides
Table3:ListofAntibioticsandPharmacologicallyActive
SubstancesBannedForUseinIndianAquaculture.
Source:Marineproductexportdevelopmentauthority
(MPEDA,2001).
5
Vigneshetal.,SouthAsianJExpBiol;1(3):xxxxxx;2011
al.,2002;Schwartzetal.,2003;Biyelaetal.,2004).
Tendenciaanddelapena(2001)foundthatantibi
oticresistancewasassociatedwithhistoricaland
currentuseofantimicrobialswhichwasfoundto
behighinshrimppondsusingoxolinicacidinfeed.
Anotherstudyshowedthatthereisanincreasein
tetracyclineresistancegenesabundance,
(comparedto16srRNAgenes)atlowleveloxytet
racyclineexposureinaquaticsystems(Knappetal.,
2008).Phylogeneticanalysisofseveralgroupsof
antibioticresistancegeneshassuggestedthatge
neticmaterialforpresentdayantibioticresistance
hashadalonghistoryofselectionanddiversifica
tionwellbeforethecurrent‘antibioticera’(Aminov
andMackie,2007).
Ithasbeenextensivelyshownthatexcessiveand
prophylacticuseofantibioticsinanimalshasa
negativeinfluenceonantibiotictherapyofanimal
andhumanbacterialinfectionsbecause1)zoonotic
antibioticresistantbacteriaareabletoinfecthu
manbeings;and2)animalandhumanpathogens
cansharegeneticdeterminantsforantibioticresis
tanceastheresultofhorizontalexchangeofge
neticinformation(HarrisonandLederberg1998;
Teuber2001;Cabello,2003;Anguloetal.,2004;
Cabello2004;Molbak,2004;Wassenaar,2005).
Becauseoftheirtoxicitytomicroorganisms,antibi
oticsmayalsoaffectthecompositionofthephyto
planktoncommunity,thezooplanktoncommunity
andeventhediversityofpopulationsoflargerani
mals.Inthismanner,potentialalterationsofthe
diversityofthemarinemicrobiotaproducedby
antibioticsmayalterthehomeostasisofthemarine
environmentandaffectcomplexformsoflifein
cludingfish,shellfish,marinemammals,andhuman
beings.Forallthesereasons,extremeantibiotic
useinaquacultureshouldbeofhighconcerntothe
aquacultureindustryanditsregulators,topublic
officialsdealingwithhumanandveterinaryhealth
andwiththesafeguardingoftheenvironment,and
tonongovernmentalorganizationsdealingwith
theseissues.
Itisnowgenerallyrenownedthatthenaturalenvi
ronmentharboursanenormousdiversityofantibi
oticresistancegenesandsomesoilbacteriamay
evensurviveonantibioticsusingthemastheirsole
sourceofcarbon(D’Costaetal.,2006;2007;
Wright,2007;Martínez,2008;Dantasetal.,2008).
Theprincipalpollutanttransformationprocesses,
microbialdegradationorbiotransformationmaybe
themostefficientwayforremovalofchemicalpol
lutantsandtheirtoxicityfromtheenvironments
(Srinivasanetal2001).Antibioticshavenotalways
beenusedinaresponsiblemannerinaquaculture
and,inanumberofreportedsituations;controlof
theuseofantibioticshasnotprovidedaproper
assuranceofthepreventionofriskstohumans.
FAO,theWorldHealthOrganization(WHO),the
InternationalOfficeofEpizootics(OIE)andanum
berofnationalgovernmentshavealreadyraised
theissueofirresponsibleuseofantibioticsinall
productionsectors,withparticularconcernforthe
potentialriskstopublichealth.Manygovernments
aroundtheworldhaveintroduced,changedor
tightenednationalregulationsontheuseofantibi
otics,ingeneralandwithintheaquaculturesector.
5.PossibleActions
Naturalbiodegradationofantibioticsintheenvi
ronmentmaynotbeanadequateoptionfortheir
eradication.Someoftheseproducts,suchasqui
nolones,takeseveralmonthstodegrade.Theup
shotisthatduringthattime,antimicrobialsare
drawnintheselectionforresistanceanditsgenetic
transfertootherbacteriaandappearanceofviru
lencefactors.Drugresistanceisamultifacetedcon
cernthathaslittlechancetoimprove,forresis
tanceisnotreversible.Therefore,thereisanur
gentneedtoembarkuponitinadeterminedman
ner.Someofthemostinstantaneousactionscould
be:
1.Synchronizationbetweenhuman,veterinary
andenvironmentalsectorstorecognizethe
magnitudeoftherelationshipsamongthe
occurrencesofantimicrobialresistancein
humans,animalsandtheenvironment.
2.Enforcementofexistinglegislation.Approxi
mately80%oftheworld’saquaculturepro
ductionoriginatesincountrieswitheither
scarceboundariesonantimicrobialuseor
negligentenforcement.
3.Themosteffectivemeanstoforestallthe
developmentandextendofantimicrobial
resistanceistoreducetheneedforantibiotic
treatment.
4.Impartingeducationaboutthesensibleuse
ofantibioticstotheaquaculturesectorsis
needful.
6
Vigneshetal.,SouthAsianJExpBiol;1(3):xxxxxx;2011
6.Conclusion
Researchmustcontinueintothedevelopmentof
safeandeffectivevaccinesagainstbacteria.Safe
andeffectivevaccineseliminatetheneedtoapply
antibiotics.Thepresenceofresidualantibiotics/
antibioticresidues,antibioticresistanceinmarine
bacteriaandinfishpathogens,andeffectsonthe
diversityofphytoplanktonandzooplanktoninar
eassurroundingaquaculturesitesshouldalsobe
ascertained.Investigationofthepresenceofresid
ualantibiotics/antibioticresiduesinfreeranging
(wild)fishandshellfisharoundaquaculturesites
andinthemeatofmarketablesalmonisnecessary.
Thepassageofantibioticresistancedeterminants
frombacteriainthemarineenvironmenttohuman
andterrestrialanimalpathogensshouldalsobe
investigated.Centralizedepidemiologicalstudiesof
fishinfectionsshouldbeimplementedandtheir
resultsrelatedtoantibioticusageandantibiotic
resistanceshouldbejustified.Thepotentialforex
posureofaquacultureworkerstoantibioticsshould
bedeterminedandthepotentialeffectsofthisex
posureshouldbeascertained.
Medicineshaveanimportantroleinthetreatment
andpreventionofdiseaseinbothhumansandani
mals.Althoughthesideeffectsonhumanandani
malhealthareusuallyinvestigatedinthorough
safetyandtoxicologystudies,thepotentialenvi
ronmentalimpactsofthemanufactureanduseof
medicinesarelesswellunderstoodandhaveonly
recentlybecomeatopicofresearchinterest.
Theaccessibilityofthegreatnumberofantibiotics,
alreadystandardforhumanuse,makesthema
precioussourcefortreatmentofother,thaninfec
tiousdiseasesinhumansandanimals.Almostnoth
ingisknownabouttheeffectsofsubinhibitoryan
tibioticsonarchaeainspiteofthattheyarewell
knownmembersinmicrobialcommunities.
Broaderandwelldefinedstudyintheseareaswill
helpinunderstandingtheantibioticsandresistance
mechanismsdevelopedbynaturalecosystems.This
willalsoassistinmakingliablechoiceswheninter
actingwiththeseecosystemsintherouteofclinical
oragriculturaluseofantibiotics.
References
AlbertTaconGJ,MarcMetian,GiovanniM,Turchini,SenaDeSilva
S(2010)Responsibleaquacultureandtrophiclevelimplicationsto
globalfishsupply.Reviewsinfisheriesscience18:94105.
AminovRI,MackieRI(2007)Evolutionandecologyofantibiotic
resistancegenes.FEMSMicrobiologyLetters271:147–161.
AnguloFJ,Nargund,VN,ChillerTC(2004)Evidenceofanassocia
tionbetweenuseofantimicrobialagentsinfoodanimalsandanti
microbialresistanceamongbacteriaisolatedfromhumansand
thehumanhealthconsequencesofsuchresistance.Journalof
VeterinaryMedicine51:374–379.
AustinB,AustinDA(1993)BacterialFishPathogens:Diseaseif
FarmedandWildFishEllisHarwood,NewYork2:384.
BruunMS,MadsenL,DalsgaardI(2003)Efficiencyofoxytetracy
clinetreatmentinrainbowtroutexperimentallyinfectedwith
Flavobacteriumpsychrophilumstrainshavingdifferentinvitro
antibioticsusceptibilities.Aquaculture215:11–20.
BiyelaPT,LinJBezuidenhoutCC(2004)theroleofaquaticecosys
temsasreservoirsofantibioticresistantbacteriaandantibiotic
resistancegenes.WaterScienceTechnology50:4550.
ChanDing,JianzhongHe(2010)Effectofantibioticsinthe
environmentonmicrobialpopulations.AppliedMicrobiologyand
Biotechnology87(3):92541.
CabelloFC(2003)Antibioticsandaquaculture.Ananalysisoftheir
potentialimpactupontheenvironment,humanandanimalhealth
inChile.FundacionTerram.AnalisisdePoliticasPublicas17:1–16.
CabelloFC(2004)AntibioticsandaquacultureinChile:implications
forhumanandanimalhealth.ReviewMedicineChile132:1001–
1006.
CabelloFC(2006)Heavyuseofprophylacticantibioticsinaquacul
ture:agrowingproblemforhumanandanimalhealthandforthe
environment.EnvironmentalMicrobiology8:11371144.
CodexCodeofPracticetoMinimizeandContainAntimicrobial
Resistance(2002)TheStateofWorldFisheriesandAquaculture
report,FAO.
DantasG,SommerMO,OluwasegunRD,ChurchGM(2008)Bacte
riasubsistingonantibioticsScience320:100–103.
D’CostaVM,McGrannKM,HughesDW,WrightGD(2006)Sam
plingtheantibioticresistomeScience311:374–377.
D’CostaVM,GriffithsE,WrightGD(2007)Expandingthesoilanti
bioticresistome:exploringenvironmentaldiversity.CurrentOpin
ioninMicrobiology10:481–489.
EsiobuN,ArmentaLIkeJ(2002)Antibioticresistanceinsoiland
waterenvironments.InternationalJournalofEnvironmental
Health12:133144.
FAO/SEAFDEC/CIDA(1996,1997,2000)Useofchemicalsinaqua
cultureinAsia,ProceedingsoftheMeetingontheUseofChemi
calsinAquacultureinAsia,Iloilo,thePhilippines.
FAO(2009)WorldAgriculture:towards20302050anFAOPer
spective,Rome,Italy.
GuidelinesfortheResponsibleandPrudentUseofAntimicrobial
AgentsinVeterinaryMedicine,OIETerrestrialInternationalAnimal
HealthCode(2006).
GuardabassiL,DalsgaardA,RaffatelluM,OlsenJE(2000)Increase
intheprevalenceofoxolinicacidresistantAcinetobacterspp.
observedinastreamreceivingtheeffluentfromafreshwater
troutfarmfollowingthetreatmentwithoxolinicacidmedicated
feed.Aquaculture188:205–218.
Gutsell,J(1946)Sulfadrugsandthetreatmentoffurunculosisin
trout.Science104:8586.
7
Vigneshetal.,SouthAsianJExpBiol;1(3):xxxxxx;2011
HallingSorensonB,NorsNielsesS,LanzkyPF,IngerslevF,
lutzhoftHCH,JorgensenSE(1998)occurrencefateandeffectsof
pharmaceuticalsubstancesintheenvironmentareview.Chemos
phere36:357394.
HektoenH,BergeJA,HormazabalV,Yndestad,M(1995)Persis
tenceofantibacterialagentsinmarinesediments.Aquaculture
133:175–184.
HernandezGC,UlloaPJ,VergaraOJA,EspejoTR,CabelloCF(2005)
Vibrioparahaemolyticusinfectionsandalgalintoxicationsasemer
gentpublichealthproblemsinChile.ReviewMedicineChile133:
1081–1088.
HarrisonPFJ,LederbergJ(1998)AntimicrobialResistance:Issues
andOptions.WorkshopReport.NationalAcademyPress,Washing
ton,DC.
Jatindra(2009)Degradationofantibiotics(Trimethoprimand
Sulphamethoxazole)pollutantsusingUVandTiO2inaqueous
medium.Modernappliedscience3:2.
JoryDE(2010)GOALProductionDataProjectsTemperedAquacul
tureGrowth:TheGlobalAquacultureAdvocate:811.
KolpinDW,FurlongET,MeyerMT,ThurmanEM,ZauggSD,Barber
LB,BuxtonHT(2002)Pharmaceuticals,hormones,andotheror
ganicwastewatercontaminantsinUSstreams1999–2000.Ana
tionalreconnaissance.EnvironmentScienceandTechnology
36:1202–1211.
KummerrerK(2009a)Antibioticsintheaquaticenvironmenta
reviewpart1.Chemosphere75:417434.
KummerrerK(2009b)Antibioticsintheaquaticenvironmenta
reviewpart11.Chemosphere75:435441.
KnappCW,EngemannCA,HansonML,KeenPL,HallKJ,Graham
DW(2008)indirectevidenceoftransposonmediatedselectionof
antibioticresistancegenesinaquaticsystemsatlowleveloxytet
racyclineexposures.EnvironmentalScienceandTechnology42:
5348–5353.
LeveySB(1992)theantibioticparadox,howmiracledrugsare
destroyingthemiracle.PlenumPublication,NewYork.
LeTX,MunekageY(2004)Residuesofselectedantibioticsinwater
andmudfromshrimppondsinmangroveareasinVietNam.Ma
rinePollutionBulletin49:922929.
MartínezJL(2008)Antibioticsandantibioticresistancegenesin
naturalenvironments.Science321:365–367.
MPEDA(2001)Notificationofbanonuseofantibiotics/drugsetc.
inaquaculture.DeputyDirector(Aqua.),MPEDA,MinistryofCom
merce,Govt.ofIndia.
MolbakK(2004)spreadofresistantbacteriaandresistancegenes
fromanimalstohumansthepublichealthconsequences.Journal
ofVeterinaryMedicine51:364369.
NawazMS,EricksonBD,KhanAA,KhanSA,PothuluriJV,RafiiF,
SutherlandJB,WagnerD,CernigliaCE(2001)Humanhealthimpact
andregulatoryissuesinvolvingantimicrobialresistanceinthefood
animalproductionenvironment.RegulationResolutionPerspec
tives1:1–10.
RhodesG,HuysG,SwingsJ,McGannP,HineyM,SmithP,Pickup
R.W(2000a)Distributionofoxytetracyclineresistanceplasmids
betweenaeromonadsinhospitalandaquacultureenvironments:
implicationofTn1721indisseminationofthetetracyclineresis
tancedeterminantTetA.AppliedandEnvironmentalMicrobiology
66:3883–3890.
ResponsibleUseofAntibioticsinAquaculture(2005)FAOTechni
calFisheriespaper469.
SalyersAA,GuptaA,WangY(2004)Humanintestinalbacteriaas
reservoirsforantibioticresistancegenesTrendsinMicrobiology
12:412416.
SrinivasanM,BragadeeswaranSandRajaramR(2001)Roleof
NeemCake,NeempowderinAquacultureVol.IV.
SrinivasanM,BalachandarSandBragadeeswaranS(1999)Mud
Crabculture.AgriGoldSwarnaSedyamVolII.(5).
StokesHW,HolmesAJ,NieldBS,HolleyMP,NevalainenKMH,
MabbuttBC,GillingsMR(2001)GenecassettePCR:sequence
independentrecoveryofentiregenesfromenvironmentalDNA.
AppliedandEnvironmentalMicrobiology67:5240–5246.
SmithP,HineyMP,SamuelsenOB(1994)Bacterialresistanceto
antimicrobialagentsusedinfishfarmingacriticalevaluationof
methodandmeaning.SchwartzT,KohnenW,JaansenB,ObstU
(2003)Detectionofantibioticresistantbacteriaandtheirresis
tancegenesinwastewatersurfacewateranddrinkingwater
biofilms.FEMSMicrobiologyEcology43:325335.
Towardssafeandeffectiveuseofchemicalsincoastalaquacul
ture.FAO(1997)ReportsandStudies,GESAMPRome65:40
WestonDP(1996)Environmentalconsiderationsintheuseof
antibacterialdrugsinaquaculture.AquacultureandWaterRe
sourceManagement.BlackwellScience,Oxford140–165.
Tendencia,delaPena(2001)Antibioticresistanceofbacteria
fromshrimpponds.Aquaculture195:193204.
TeuberM(2001)Veterinaryuseandantibioticresistance.Current
OpinioninMicrobiology4:493499.
WrightGD(2007)theantibioticresistomethenexusofchemical
andgeneticdiversity.NatureReviewMicrobiology5:175–186.
WassenaarTM(2005)Useofantimicrobialagentsinveterinary
medicineandimplicationsforhumanhealth.CriticalReviewsin
Microbiology31:155169.
WollenbergerL,HallingSorensenB,KuskKO(2000)Acuteand
chronictoxicityofveterinaryantibioticsofDaphniamagna.
Chemosphere40:723730.
... However, it is important to mention that the use of antibiotics and other chemical treatments in aquaculture can increase bacterial resistance and produce negative effects on the intestinal microbiota, which in turn can have negative consequences on their health and growth, the environment, and human health. Therefore, it is best to take preventive actions (Aly & Albutti., 2014;Chen et al., 2020;Vignesh et al. 2011;Watts et al., 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Sea urchin aquaculture is a rising industry, and in consequence, there is a need to establish optimal culture parameters to ensure the health of the cultured animals. Objective: To evaluate the bacterial counts in the seawater of sea urchin (Arbacia dufresnii) aquaculture recirculating systems (RAS). Methods: The bacteriological water quality of two RAS containing sea urchins was determined. For approximately two months, weekly water samples were taken. The bacteriological quality was determined by counting total aerobic heterotrophic populations, lactic acid bacteria, enterobacterias and genus Vibrio. Physicochemical parameters were also measured. Results: There was no presence of disease or mortality. Enterobacteria and lactic acid bacteria were not detected from both RAS systems. The number of animals had an important effect on the observed difference in the count of total bacteria and Vibrio spp. In RAS 1 the maximum counts of total bacteria and Vibrio spp. were 2.8 x 10⁵ ± 1.7 x 10⁵ and 1.45 x 10⁵ ± 3.6 x 10⁴ UFC ml⁻¹, respectively. In RAS 2 total bacteria and Vibrio spp. exhibited repetitive behavior over time influenced in part by water exchange and mainly by feeding. The results indicate that periodic water changes ensure a limited growth of bacterial strains as Vibrio and other bacteria. Conclusions: Our results suggests that the bacterial count levels recorded in this study can be used as a threshold or safety limit for Arbacia dufresnii aquaculture.
... Further, antibiotic usage may fluctuate greatly from year to year, even in the same regions, due to climate and disease outbreaks. This high level of variation in antibiotic usage is reflected in inconsistent reports from farmer surveys (Lyle-Fritch et al. 2006;Thuy et al. 2011;Rico et al. 2013;Tu sevljak et al. 2013;Ali et al. 2016;Liu et al. 2017;Thi Kim Chi et al. 2017), and this situation is familiar across the aquaculture world, with reviews on antibiotic usage in general aquaculture demonstrating the scale and complexity of this issue (Vignesh et al. 2011;Done et al. 2016;Muziasari et al. 2016;Mo et al. 2017;Lozano et al. 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing threat to global public health, and the overuse of antibiotics in animals has been identified as a major risk factor. With high levels of international trade and direct connectivity to the aquatic environment , shrimp aquaculture may play a role in global AMR dissemination. The vast majority of shrimp production occurs in low-and middle-income countries, where antibiotic quality and usage is widely unregulated, and where the integration of aquaculture with family livelihoods offers many opportunities for human, animal and environmental bacteria to come into close contact. Furthermore, in shrimp growing areas, untreated waste is often directly eliminated into local water sources. These risks are very different to many other major internationally-traded aquaculture commodities, such as salmon, which is produced in higher income countries where there are greater levels of regulation and well-established management practices. Assessing the true scale of the risk of AMR dissemination in the shrimp industry is a considerable challenge, not least because obtaining reliable data on antibiotic usage is very difficult. Combating the risks associated with AMR dissemination is also challenging due to the increasing trend towards inten-sification and its associated disease burden, and because many farmers currently have no alternatives to antibiotics for preventing crop failure. In this review, we critically assess the potential risks the shrimp industry poses to AMR dissemination. We also discuss some of the possible risk mitigation strategies that could be considered by the shrimp industry as it strives for a more sustainable future in production.
Article
The pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin was studied in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) after single administration by intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM) and oral (OR) gavage at a dose of 10 mg/kg and by 10 mg/L bath for 2 h at 11.7 ± 0.8 °C. Furthermore, minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of danofloxacin against a pathogenic strain of Yersinia ruckeri, Pseudomonas spp., and Aeromonas hydrophila were determined. Plasma concentrations of danofloxacin were determined using high-performance liquid chromatograph - UV and further subjected to noncompartmental analysis. Elimination half-lives for IV, IM, OR and bath administration were 25.97 h, 42.43 h, 41.04 h and 40.41 h, respectively. Peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) for IM, OR and bath administration were 3.64 ± 0.12, 2.93 ± 0.23, and 0.36 ± 0.02 μg/mL, respectively. Bioavailability was 105.87% (IM), 96.92% (OR) and 10.09% (bath). MIC values were 0.02 μg/mL for Y. ruckeri, 3.2 μg/mL for Pseudomonas spp., and 8 μg/mL for A. hydrophila at 12 °C. Danofloxacin provides the desired AUC0–24/MIC (≥125) and Cmax/MIC (≥10) values for Y. ruckeri following administration at a dose of 10 mg/kg (L) from all routes administration, whereas inadequate for Pseudomonas spp. and A. hydrophila. This information may help in the use of danofloxacin in rainbow trout, but increasing doses pharmacokinetics with the residue depletion study and clinical studies in infected fish are needed.
Article
Full-text available
To investigate the level of WSSV transmission from the infected tiger prawn Penaeus monodon (P. monodon) to specific pathogen free Litopenaeus vannamei (L. vannamei) in laboratory captivity condition in relation to PCR detection, histopathological observation and viral genome sequence.Methods Viral DNA was isolated from purified virions by treatment with proteinase K (0.2 mg/mL) and Sarkosyl (1%). The purity and concentration of the DNA were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis. Moribund and dead shrimp were removed and processed for indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) analysis. Histological observation of infected L. vannamei shrimps were revealed by the degenerated cells which were characterized by intranuclear inclusions in the tissues of WSSV infected mid-gut gland, lymphoid organ, gill lamellae and gut epithelium. Total DNA was extracted, from shrimp hemolymph and tissues, with a High Puree PCR template preparation kit. WSSV-DNA was detected using a commercial 2-step PCR detection kit.ResultsThe present study compares the real-time PCR results with SYBR Green I concentration ranging from 0.2 to 0.7×. The positive standard was used in the range of 102, 104 106, 108 and 1010 copies/ng of DNA in general. The PCR analysis showed the appearance of a prominent band from the PCR amplified product of WSSV-DNA at internal control band of 848 bp. Moderate and severe levels were observed as 650 bp and 910 bp (200 & 2 000 copies) in various transmission routes. The WSSV content in moribund shrimp of all the experimental species (L. vannamei) approximately ranged in nucleotide application by quantification method from 0.000 001 WSSV copies/μg of total DNA. In whole moribund infection animal, approximately 0.02 WSSV copies/μg of DNA was detected in nucleotide applied animal.Conclusion These results indicate that wild brood stock and native culture shrimp P. monodon may be infected with WSSV and can get transferred into the SPF L. vannamei farming environment. Based on the studies, we made in captivity condition in different WSSV transmission route in dissimilar infection range with the use of nucleotide for antiviral drugs. There is an urgent need to address and develop antiviral drugs and molecular based viral genome technique for control measures to salt away the aquaculture environments.
Article
Full-text available
Objective To detect the water samples and shrimp samples in white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) affecting and non-affecting zone.MethodsA total of 12 samples specific pathogen free Litopenaeus vannamei (L. vannamei); adult shrimp and larvae were randomly collected. Their genomic DNA was isolated and subjected to PCR. Histopathological identifications were carried out, and the hematopoietic tissues with basophilic intranuclear inclusion bodies characteristic were observed in moderate WSSV infected L. vannameiResultsThe PCR analysis showed the appearance of a prominent band from the PCR amplified product of WSSV-DNA at internal control band 848 bp at non-infected areas. Although low infection positive bands (20 copies) were shown at 296 bp continued from initial stage of the infection region. On a moderate and ascetic level were observed as 650 bp and 910 bp (200 and 2 000 copies), during the severe out break periods. The gill epithelial cells were edematous and nuclei were hypertrophied with basophilic inclusions, but no pathological changes or hypertrophied nuclei were observed in any of L.vannamei tissues in WSSV uninfected region. The Intranuclear inclusion bodies characteristics of high level of WSSV infection presented in the gill region.Conclusions The present study is significant, which investigated the level of WSSV transmission from the infected tiger prawn P.monodon to SPFL. vannamei in the WSSV impact region of Tamil Nadu coastal waters.
Article
Full-text available
White spot syndrome virus (WSSV), the causative virus of the disease, is found in most shrimp farming areas of the world, where it causes large economic losses to the shrimp farming industry. The potentially fatal virus has been found to be a threat not only to all shrimp species, but also to other marine and freshwater crustaceans, such as crab and crayfish. To date, no effective prophylactic treatment measures are available for viral infections in shrimp and other crustaceans. Due to current aquaculture practices and the broad host range of WSSV, intervention strategies including vaccination against this virus would be pivotal to save and protect shrimp farming. Several achievements have been attained in the search of novel vaccines for WSSV. DNA vaccination, recombinant vaccines, oral vaccination techniques and gene therapy are some of the thrust areas of focus for scientists and researchers. This review article highlights the recent trends in the development of WSSV vaccines either as DNA vaccines or recombinant vaccines and their functioning strategies as suggested by the researchers worldwide.
Article
Full-text available
Reports of antibiotic-resistant bacteria isolated from farms and animal carcasses are raising concerns that antibiotic use in agriculture may play a role in selecting for antibiotic resistance among foodborne bacteria. Emergence of antimicrobial resistance is a very controversial issue. Some contend that the indiscriminate use of antibiotics in agriculture creates a reservoir of resistant microorganisms in the environment that could infect hu- mans through the food chain. Others contend that the abuse of antibiotics in human medicine may instead be largely responsible for the increase in antibiotic resistance. Animal drug industry representatives feel that there is not enough evidence to conclusively demonstrate a link between the use of antibiotics in food animals and the emergence of antibiotic -resistant bacteria. The research and regulatory issues on antimicrobial s used in food - producing animals are of great importance to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This report will cover recent developments and describe some of the collaborative research (Table 1) that is being conducted in the Di- vision of Microbiology at the National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR).
Article
Full-text available
Hunger and malnutrition remain among the most devastating problems facing the world's poor and needy, and continue to dominate the health and well-being of the world's poorest nations. Moreover, there are growing doubts as to the long-term sustainability of many existing food production systems, including capture fisheries and aquaculture, to meet the future increasing global demands. Of the different agricultural food production systems, aquaculture (the farming of aquatic animals and plants) is widely viewed as an important weapon in the global fight against malnutrition and poverty, particularly within developing countries where over 93% of global production is currently produced, providing in most instances an affordable and a much needed source of high quality animal protein, lipids, and other essential nutrients. The current article compares for the first time the development and growth of the aquaculture sector and capture fisheries by analyzing production by mean trophic level. Whereas marine capture fisheries have been feeding the world on high trophic level carnivorous fish species since mankind has been fishing the oceans, aquaculture production within developing countries has focused, by and large, on the production of lower trophic level species. However, like capture fisheries, aquaculture focus within economically developed countries has been essentially on the culture of high value-, high trophic level-carnivorous species. The long term sustainability of these production systems is questionable unless the industry can reduce its dependence upon capture fisheries for sourcing raw materials for feed formulation and seed inputs. In line with above, the article calls for the urgent need for all countries to adopt and adhere to the principles and guidelines for responsible aquaculture of the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries.
Book
This completely updated fifth edition of Bacterial Fish Pathogens is a comprehensive discussion of the biological aspects of the bacteria which cause disease in farmed and wild fish. Since the 4th edition was published in 2007, there has been an upturn in the application of molecular approaches to taxonomy, diagnosis and vaccine development. New pathogens, e.g. Aeromonas schubertii, have been described. Also, there has been the emergence of diseases caused by bacteria which have not been cultured, and which have been equated with new taxa, i.e. Candidatus . Consideration is given to all the bacterial fish pathogens, including primary pathogens and opportunists. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. All rights reserved.
Article
The widespread and indiscriminate use of antibiotics has led to the development of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic, as well as commensal, microorganisms. Resistance genes may be horizontally or vertically transferred between bacterial communities in the environment. The recipient bacterial communities may then act as a reservoir of these resistance genes. In this study, we report the incidence of antibiotic resistance in enteric bacteria isolated from the Mhlathuze River and the distribution of genetic elements that may be responsible for the observed antibiotic resistance. The resistance of the enteric bacteria isolated over a period of one year showed that resistance to the older classes of antibiotics was high (94.7% resistance to one antibiotic and 80.8% resistance to two antibiotics). Furthermore, antibiotic resistance data of the environmental isolates showed a strong correlation (r = 0.97) with data obtained from diarrhoea patients. PCR based methods demonstrated that class 1 integrons were present in >50% of the environmental bacterial isolates that were resistant to multiple antibiotics. This class of integrons is capable of transferring genes responsible for resistance to beta-lactam, aminoglycoside, sulfonamide and quaternary ammonium antimicrobial agents. Conjugate plasmids were also isolated, but from a small percentage of isolates. This study showed that the Mhlathuze River (a) is a medium for the spread of bacterial antibiotic resistance genes, (b) acts as a reservoir for these genes and (c) due to socio-economic pressures, may play a role in the development and evolution of these genes along this river system.
Article
Antibiotics are essential for the treatment of bacterial infections and are among our most important drugs. Resistance has emerged to all classes of antibiotics in clinical use. Antibiotic resistance has, proven inevitable and very often it emerges rapidly after the introduction of a drug into the clinic. There is, therefore, a great interest in understanding the origins, scope and evolution of antibiotic resistance. The review discusses the concept of the antibiotic resistome, which is the collection of all genes that directly or indirectly contribute to antibiotic resistance. The review seeks to assemble current knowledge of the resistome concept as a means of understanding the totality of resistance and not just resistance in pathogenic bacteria. The concept of the antibiotic resistome provides a framework for the study and understanding of how resistance emerges and evolves. Furthermore, the study of the resistome reveals strategies that can be applied in new antibiotic discoveries.
Article
Acinetobacter spp. were used as bacterial indicators to monitor antimicrobial resistance in a freshwater trout farm before and after treatment with oxolinic acid (OA)-medicated feed. The level of susceptibility to four antimicrobial agents was determined in 331 Acinetobacter isolates obtained by a selective procedure from a pond (n=100), the inlet channel (n=105), and the stream receiving the farm effluent (n=126). Before treatment, OA resistance was detected only among isolates from the pond (40%), in which the last medication with OA was dated back to 6 months before. Following treatment, a high prevalence of OA resistance was observed among isolates from both the pond (33–53%) and the effluent recipient (21–55%). In contrast, no OA resistant strains were isolated from the inlet channel. OA resistant strains were significantly more resistant to oxytetracycline (OT) compared with OA sensitive strains (P<0.0001, odds ratio=43.6). Furthermore, OA resistant isolates showed an increase of at least 10-fold times in the MIC values for ciprofloxacin (CIP) resistance compared with sensitive isolates. Phenotypic characterisation and PCR-based fingerprinting analysis showed lower diversity among Acinetobacter isolates from the pond and the stream receiving the farm effluent in comparison with isolates from the inlet channel. Since the two biotypes predominant in the pond and the effluent recipient included the vast majority of OA resistant isolates, the low diversity of Acinetobacter spp. observed at these sites could have been enhanced by exposure to the drug. The results of this study indicate that the use of OA in inland farms can affect the levels of antimicrobial resistance and diversity in the microflora of natural aquatic habitats situated downstream. Since the ecological consequences deriving from changes of the indigenous aquatic microflora are unknown, the careful consideration of the use of OA in aquaculture was suggested.