K. IŞIK
411
Turk J Bot
35 (2011) 411-417
© TÜBİTAK
doi:10.3906/bot-1012-90
Rare and endemic species: why are they prone to extinction? *
Kani IŞIK**
Biology Department, Science Faculty, Akdeniz University, 07058, Antalya - TURKEY
Received: 11.12.2010
Accepted: 12.02.2011
Abstract: A species is considered to be “rare” if it exhibits any one of the following attributes: (1) naturally occurs in a
narrow geographical area, (2) occupies only one or a few specialised habitats, (3) forms only small population(s) in its
range. An “endemic” species, however, grows naturally in a single geographical area, the size of which could be either
narrow or relatively large. Not all endemic species are rare, just as not all rare species must necessarily be endemic.
Many rare and/or endemic species exhibit one or more of the following attributes which make them especially prone to
extinction: (1) narrow (and single) geographical range, (2) only one or a few populations, (3) small population size and
little genetic variability, (4) over-exploitation by people, (5) declining population sizes, (6) low reproductive potential,
(7) the need for specialised ecological niches, (8) growth that requires stable and nearly constant environments. When
habitats of a rare and/or endemic species are damaged and/or fragmented by various human activities, the distribution
ranges and population sizes of the species will be reduced, leaving them vulnerable to extinction at a much higher rate
than other comparable species. Species that experience any of the above attributes must be given priority and monitored
and managed carefully in an e ort to promote genetic conservation.
Key words: Rare species, endemism, extinction, population, conservation biology
Nadir ve endemik türler yok-oluş olayına niçin duyarlıdır?
Özet: Bir tür şu üç özellikten herhangi birini taşırsa, o tür “nadir tür” olarak düşünülür. (1) Doğal olarak küçük bir
coğra k alanda bulunursa, (2) yalnızca bir veya birkaç özelleşmiş habitatta (yaşama ortamında) yetişirse, (3) yayılma
alanında yalnızca küçük populasyon(lar) halinde bulunursa. Öte yandan bir “endemik tür” ise tek bir coğra k alanda
yetişen türdür, ama bu coğra k alan küçük bir alan olabildiği gibi geniş bir alan da olabilir. Her endemik tür, nadir tür
değildir. Aynı şekilde her nadir tür de endemik tür olmayabilir. Nadir ve endemik türlerin çoğu, aşağıdaki özelliklerden
birini veya birçoğunu gösterebilirler. (1) Küçük (ya da tek bir) coğra k bölgede yetişmek, (2) yalnızca bir veya birkaç
populasyona sahip olmak, (3) populasyonların küçük olması ve çok az genetik çeşitlilik göstermesi, (4) insanlar
tarafından aşırı ölçüde avlanılması ya da hasat edilmesi, (5) populasyonun gittikçe azalan bir eğilim göstermesi, (6)
üreme potansiyelinin düşük olması, (7) özelleşmiş ekolojik nişlere ihtiyaç duymaları, (8) kararlı, durağan ve değişime
duyarlı bir çevrede yetişmeleri. Bu özellikler, nadir ve endemik türlerin yok-oluş olayına karşı özellikle duyarlı olmasına
yol açar. Nadir ve endemik türlerin yaşama ortamları değişik insan etkinlikleriyle bozulursa ya da bu ortamlar parçalara
bölünürse, önce bu türlerin dağılış alanları ve populasyon büyüklükleri azalmakta, sonra da bu türler, diğer türlere
kıyasla yok-oluşa doğru daha hızlı gitmektedir. Yukarıda belirtilen özelliklerden herhangi birine veya birden fazlasına
sahip olan türler genetik kaynakların korunması çalışmalarında öncelikle ele alınmalı ve dikkatlice izlenip yönetilmelidir.
Anahtar sözcükler: Nadir tür, endemik tür, yok-oluş, populasyon, koruma biyolojisi
Research Article
* Paper submitted at the International Symposium on the Biology of Rare and Endemic Plant Species (BIORARE Symposium), 26-29
May 2010, Fethiye, Muğla - Turkey.
** E-mail: kani@akdeniz.edu.tr
Rare and endemic species: why are they prone to extinction?
412
Introduction
In this article, I will rst de ne the concepts related
to rare and endemic species. e common features
of extinction prone species will then be discussed,
followed by the path that leads to the extinction of a
species. is information will hopefully provide the
main basis for establishing strategies for biological
conservation.
Generally speaking, if a species demonstrates any
of the following characteristics, it is considered a rare
species: (a) grows naturally in a narrow geographical
area, (b) occupies only one or few specialised habitats,
(c) forms only small population(s) in its range. At the
opposite end of these criteria lie the species that are
called common (cosmopolite) and/or abundant.
An endemic species, however, is the one that
grows naturally only in a single geographic area, the
size of which could be either narrow or relatively
large. A species may be both rare and endemic if
it lives in a narrow (and single) geographical area
(Primack, 2006).
Depending on the scale of the geographic range,
endemic species are called by a variety of di erent
names. For example, an endemic species may be
restricted only to a small, local geographic area, in
which case it is called a “local endemic.” As the size
of the geographic range become larger, an endemic
species may labelled “provincial endemic” (restricted
within the borders of a province), “national endemic”
(grows only within the borders of a nation),
or “regional endemic” (grows only in a certain
geographical region). When the distribution range of
a species is restricted only to a single continent and
not found in any others, as is the case for many plant
and animal species in Australia, then one can also
talk about a “continental endemic.”
e following examples can be instructive for
each of the above cited endemism types. Sternbergia
candida Mathew et T.Baytop (Liliaceae fam.), for
example, is a local endemic that grows naturally
only within the borders of Fethiye (Muğla, Turkey)
and its neighbourhoods. Centaurea dursunbeyensis
Uysal & Köse is another example of a local endemic
which grows naturally in limestone crevices around
Dursunbey (Balıkesir) (Uysal and Köse, 2009).
Anthemis ammophila Boiss. et Heldr. (Asteraceae
fam.) (Antalya daisy) is an example of a provincial
endemic species, found naturally in several localities
all of which are within the borders of the Antalya
province in Turkey. Crocus ancyrensis (Herbert) Maw
(Iridaceae fam.) grows in many localities in the central
Anatolian region of Turkey and its neighbourhoods.
Since it is restricted to the borders of a single nation,
however, it is considered a national endemic species.
Pancratium maritimum L. (Amaryllidaceae fam.) (sea
da odil) is a regional endemic of the Mediterranean
basin since it grows naturally in the coastal sands
of many countries along the Mediterranean Sea.
Finally, a well known pine species, Pinus sylvestris L.
(Pinaceae fam.), is a good example of a continental
endemic because it naturally grows only in Eurasia.
eplacement of rare and endemic species in a
three-dimensional (3-D) space
e features listed below are the 3 important
criteria that determine the conservation status
of a species. ese are: (a) geographic range, (b)
population size, and (c) habitat demands. Figure 1
illustrates the relationships among these criteria in a
3-D space. e geographic range of a species may be
very narrow, very wide, or anywhere in between these
extreme ranges (X, on horizontal axis) (Figure 1). e
population size of a species may also range from very
small to very large (Y, on vertical axis) (Figure 1).
Similarly, the habitat demand or habitat preference of
a species may be very speci c (specialised species), or
general (generalist species) (Z, the third dimension)
(Figure 1).
If a species is both rare and endemic, by de nition,
it is located in the very lower le corner of the 3-D
space. e rectangular 3-D space bordered by broken
lines along the X axis represents rare species with
a small population size and rather speci c habitat
requirements but a relatively wide geographic range.
Similarly, the rectangular 3-D space along the Y axis
represents rare species with restricted geographic
range and rather speci c habitat requirements
but a relatively large population size. Finally, the
rectangular 3-D space along the Z axis represents
rare species with restricted geographic range and a
small population size but relatively moderate habitat
demands.
Any species located on the lower le corner of the
3-D space (i.e. species that are both rare and endemic)
K. IŞIK
413
needs the highest and most immediate rescue actions
in conservation programs. Any species located on
the upper far right corner of the 3-D space can be
considered a generalist, with rather wide distribution
range and very large population size. Such species are
in very low risk of extinction and usually they are not
of immediate concern for conservation purposes.
IUCN conservation categories
e IUCN (International Union for Conservation
of Nature) has established 9 categories of species
(Figure 2) (IUCN, 2001). ese categories are
useful as a diagnostic tool to determine the risk of
extinction and establish conservation strategies for
the involved species. As data become available and
information accumulates on a species (by taxonomic
experts, conservationists, and other biologists), its
conservation status is constantly being re-evaluated
(www.iucnredlist.org) (Ekim et al., 2000). It is also
possible that a species considered to be extinct could
be re-discovered a er several years, causing its IUCN
conservation status to be re-evaluated (Kandemir,
2009).
e expressions below need clari cation to
prevent confusion in following the IUCN categories.
A species is considered extinct when no member of
the species remains alive anywhere in the world. e
expression “extinct in the wild” refers to species in
which individuals remain alive only in captivity or
small
l
arge
Population
size, y
narrow
wi
d
e
Geographic range, x
genera
l
is
t
specia
l
ist
Ha
b
itat pre
f
erence, z
Figure 1. ree dimensional (3-D) illustration showing the
place of rare and/or endemic species in relation to its
geographic range (X axis), population size (Y), and
habitat demands (Z).
reatened
(CR, EN, VU)
Lower risk
(NT, LC)
Data
decient
(
DD
)
Extinct
(EX, EW)
Extinct,
Extinct in the wild
Near threatened,
Least concern
Critically endangered,
Endangered,
Vulnerable
Adequate
data
Inadequate
data
Evaluated
SPECIES
Not
evaluated
Not
evaluated
(NE)
Figure 2. IUCN Conservation (or Red List) categories. De ning such categories helps
to determine extinction risk and establish conservation strategies for the
involved species. (Redrawn by the author, based on information in IUCN
2001.)
Rare and endemic species: why are they prone to extinction?
414
under human care, and no subjects are present in
natural habitats. A “locally extinct” or “extirpated”
species refers to a species which is no longer found
in an area where it used to live before although it still
lives elsewhere in the wild.
Common features of extinction prone species
Species that exhibit one or more of the following
features are vulnerable to extinction (Primack, 2006):
a - Species with a narrow (or single) geographic
range,
b - Species with only one or few populations,
c - Species with a small population size,
d - Species with a declining population size,
e - Species hunted or harvested by people,
f - Species with low reproductive ability and/or
germplasm-dispersal-ability,
g - Species that require specialised habitat and
niche conditions.
e above listed characteristics of extinction-
prone species are generally not independent of one
another. For example, species with specialised niche
requirements also tend to have a small population size.
Species that face the full range of these characteristics
are the ones that are most vulnerable to extinction.
Each of these groups is brie y discussed below.
a - Species with a narrow (or single) geographic
range: As the geographic range of a species become
larger, the probability of its extinction becomes
smaller (Figure 3). For example, omas et al. (2004)
estimated that more than one million species, mainly
those with narrow ranges, could become extinct by
2050, merely as a result of global climate change.
Among the species with comparable geographic
ranges, those with special niche and habitat
requirements are more vulnerable to extinction than
those less demanding (generalist) species. Similarly,
species with a smaller population size have a higher
probability of extinction than those with larger
population sizes (Figure 3).
b - Species with only one or few populations: is
category is related to the previous one, because
species with only one or few populations will also
tend to have a narrow or single geographical range.
Species with only a single population remaining
obviously have greater risk of extinction than those
with more than one population. Any chance factor,
such as a disease or the intrusion of human activity,
may result in habitat destruction, population decline,
and the eventual extinction of a species with only one
or few populations.
c - Species with a small population size: Small
populations may pose a number of di culties for a
species. ey are likely to have low genetic variability
and experience inbreeding depression. Furthermore,
they are more vulnerable to environmental changes
and demographic variation. erefore, small
populations are more likely to go locally extinct.
Lande (1988) has also discussed the genetic and
demographic consequences of small population
sizes in greater detail. A long term study by Jones
and Diamond (1976) on bird species living in
the Channel Islands o the coast of California
showed that extinction rates decrease as the size of
the breeding population increases. For example,
populations with fewer than 10 breeding pairs had
about a 40% probability of extinction over 80 years,
whereas populations with 100 breeding pairs had
about 10% probability of extinction. It can be seen,
then, that populations with more than 100 breeding
pairs have a very low probability of extinction.
ese ndings are also relevant for botanical
studies. A study on a plant species, Ipamopsis aggregate
(Pursh.) V. Grant, reported that seed germination in
small populations was considerably lower than that
seen in relatively large populations (Heschel & Paige,
1995).
Small
Large
Local Provncal Natonal Regonal Contnental Global
Geographc Range
1.0
C
A
B
A: Average trend
B: Specalsed and/or Small popns
C: Generalsts and or Large popns
0.0
Pr. Extncton
Figure 3. Probability (Pr.) of extinction of species depending on
the size of the geographic range.
K. IŞIK
415
A theoretical study on an idealised population
at various e ective population sizes (N
e
) has
indicated that loss of genetic variability is higher
over time in smaller populations than it is in larger
populations (Groom et al., 2006). For example, a er
10 generations there was a loss of genetic variability
of about 40% with an e ective population size of 10, a
loss of 65% with an e ective population size of 5, and
95% loss occurred with an e ective population size
of 2. e main reason for this loss was genetic dri ,
which o en operates in small populations (Groom et
al., 2006).
Reduced genetic variability means greater
susceptibility to various deleterious genetic
processes such as inbreeding depression, the loss of
evolutionary potential, and the loss of the ability to
adapt to changing conditions. Each of these factors,
either alone or in combination, may contribute to
a decline in population size, which, in turn leads
to eventual extinction (Frankham, 2005). Several
other genetic and non-genetic factors that a ect the
population size, genetic diversity, and adaptation of a
species are summarised in Figure 4.
d - Species with declining population size: A
population may be large, but show signs of decline
over time. Unless the cause(s) of decline is identi ed
and corrected, the nal outcome is a small population
size and, ultimately, the related problems that such
populations face (Figure 4).
e - Species hunted or harvested by people: Over-
exploitation (over-harvesting or over-hunting) can
rapidly reduce the population size of a species. If the
harvesting is not regulated by national laws, local
ethics, and/or international regulations (such as
CITES), the species can be driven to extinction. For
example, a study on a medicinal plant by Ghimire et
al. (2005) showed that recovery of original density was
very slow in the years following intensive harvesting
(75% and 100% reduction of original density). When
no harvesting was permitted, however, this situation
was able to change quickly; density levels increased
to about twice that of the original density a er 3 years
of no harvesting.
f - Species with low reproductive ability and/or
germplasm-dispersal-ability: Species with low biotic
(reproductive) potential and low dispersal ability
(particularly in species with a larger size) are more
prone to extinction. In plants, species with large and/
or short-lived seeds are more vulnerable than those
with smaller, long-lived seeds (Kolb & Diekmann,
2005). Species that are able to produce both by seeds
and clonal means have a higher chance of survival.
In the face of changing environments (either
human-induced or natural), a species has to either
migrate to suitable habitats or adapt to the new
habitat conditions. Otherwise, the species will go
extinct. It should be kept in mind, however, that
the rate of adaptation (i.e. genetic changes) is o en
far behind (and unable to catch up with) the rate of
rapid human-induced environmental changes. For
this reason, species that are unable to disperse and
colonise new areas have a higher risk of extinction.
g - Species that require specialised habitat and
niche conditions: Species with a low tolerance range
(those with specialised niche requirements) have a
greater tendency to become extinct when changes
occur in the environment. Examples of these types
of species include wetland plants, plants with speci c
pollinators, and plants that require speci c dispersal
agents.
Many species are found in stable environments
where human disturbance is minimal, such as old
stands, core areas of forests, and wild pastures
(pastures with no cultivation). Facing changes in the
physical and chemical environments of such areas,
Mgraton
GEOGRAPHIC
RANGE
Harvestng,
Huntng
POPULATION
SIZE
GENETIC
DIVERSITY
ABILITY TO ADAPT TO
CHANGING ENVIRONMENTS
(SURVIVAL + GROWTH +
REPRODUCTION RATE)
Habtat loss
and
fragmentaton
Reproductve
behavour,
Inbreedng
Polymorphc
genes
Mutaton rate
Figure 4. Factors a ecting population size, genetic diversity, and
adaptation.
Rare and endemic species: why are they prone to extinction?
416
certain species are unable to adapt and fail to rebuild
their populations fast enough to avoid extinction.
e path to extinction (4 Ds)
ere are 4 processes, which can be thought of as
the 4 Ds, that follow each other in subsequent order
before extinction takes place. ese are destruction,
degradation, decline, and, nally, disappearance
(extinction). Species vulnerable to extinction are
more susceptible and more rapidly a ected by each
of these processes. Figure 5 summarises the diversity
of human activities and associated events that
contribute to the 4 D process.
Summary and conclusion
Many rare and/or endemic species have one or
more of the following characteristics: (1) ey have
a narrow (or single) geographical range, (2) they
have only one or a few populations remaining, (3)
they show small population size and little genetic
variability, (4) they are usually over-exploited (over-
hunted and over-harvested) by people, (5) they
exhibit declining population sizes, (6) they have low
reproductive ability, (7) they show specialised niche
demands, (8) they grow in stable and nearly constant
environments. All of these attributes, either alone or
in combination, make a species prone to extinction
at an increased rate. When habitats of a rare and/or
endemic species are damaged and/or fragmented by
mismanagement and various other human activities,
the distribution ranges, population sizes, and genetic
variability of the species will be reduced and its
members will become vulnerable to extinction at a
faster rate than other species. Species with any one
or more of the above attributes must be carefully
monitored and managed in an e ort to maintain
biodiversity.
Acknowledgements
Special thanks are extended to 2 anonymous
reviewers for their constructive criticism, and to Dr
Özge Tufan Çetin and Yusuf Kurt, who helped in
xing the gures in the paper. Akdeniz University
Scienti c Research Project Unit, Antalya, provided
partial support to the study.
Increasng human populaton, ncreasng consumpton
Dversty of human actvtes
Agrculture,
loggng,
fsheres
Industry and
fossl fuel use
Urbansaton and
road constructon
Internatonal
trade
Habtat loss, habtat
degradaton, habtat
fragmentaton,
polluton (N, P, …),
land cover change,
Overexplotaton
Introducton of
nvasve
speces and
dsease
Clmate change
Degradaton of ecosystems,
Eroson of genetc dversty and evolutonary potental,
Loss of ecosystem servces,
Eroson of lfe-support systems for human socetes
Loss of bologcal dversty,
Extncton of speces and populatons
(Modfed from Groom et al., 2006)
Figure 5. Major forces that threaten biological diversity and that lead to the
extinction of a species.
K. IŞIK
417
References
Ekim T, Koyuncu M, Vural M, Duman H, Aytaç Z & Adıgüzel N
(2000). Red Data Book of Turkish Plants (Pteridophyta and
Spermatophyta). Turkish Association for Conservation of
Nature, Ankara & Van Yüzüncü Yıl University (in Turkish).
Frankham R (2005). Genetics and extinction. Biological Conservation.
126: 131-140.
Ghimire SK, McKey D & Aumeeruddy- omas Y (2005).
Conservation of Himalayan medicinal plants: Harvesting
patterns and ecology of two threatened species, Nardostachys
grandi ora DC. and Neopicrorhiza scrophularii ora (Pennell)
Hong. Biological Conservation 124: 463-475.
Groom MJ, Me e GK & Carroll CR (2006). Principle of Conservation
Biology. Sinauer Inc, Sunderland MA.
Heschel MS & Paige KN (1995). Inbreeding depression,
environmental stress and population size variation in Scarlett
Gilia (Ipomopsis aggregata). Conservation Biology 9: 126-133.
IUCN (2001). IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version
3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland,
Switzerland.
Jones HL & Diamond JM (1976). Short-time-base studies of turnover
in breeding birds of the California Channel Islands. Condor 76:
526-549.
Kandemir A (2009). e Rediscovery of Some Taxa ought to Have
Been Extinct in Tur ke y. Turk J Bot 33: 113-122.
Kolb A & Diekmann M (2005). E ects of life history traits on
responses of plant species to forest fragmentation. Conservation
Biology 19: 929-938.
Lande R. 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation.
Science 241: 1455-1460.
Primack RB (2006). Essentials of Conservation Biology. Sinauer
Assoc., Inc., Sunderland, MA.
omas JA, Telfer MG, Roy DB, Preston CD, Greenwood JJD, Asher
J, Fox R, Clarke RT & Lawton JH (2004). Comparative losses of
British butter ies, birds, and plants and the global extinction
crises. Science 303: 1879-1881.
Uysal T & Köse, YB (2009). A New Centaurea L. (Asteraceae) Species
from Turkey Turk J Bot 33: 41-46.