Comparison of integrated evoked EMG between the hypothenar and facial muscle groups following atracurium and vecuronium administration

Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia (Impact Factor: 2.53). 05/1991; 38(3):318-23. DOI: 10.1007/BF03007621
Source: PubMed


In 17 healthy patients undergoing O2.N2O.isoflurane anaesthesia, following atracurium or vecuronium administration, we compared simultaneous integrated evoked electromyograms (IEEMGs) during spontaneous recovery of the adductor digiti minimi (ADM) and orbicularis oris (OOM) muscle groups in response to train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar and facial nerves, respectively. In all patients, the onset of neuromuscular recovery occurred first in the OOM. The time required to recover to a T4/T1 = 0.70 +/- 0.01 (SD) was earlier in the OOM compared with the ADM muscles in both the atracurium (33.4 +/- 5 vs 46.5 +/- 8, P less than 0.005) and vecuronium (46.5 +/- 12 vs 60.3 +/- 20, P less than 0.005) groups. When the OOM attained a T4/T1 = 0.70 +/- 0.01, the simultaneous T4/T1 in the ADM was 0.29 +/- 0.15 (P less than 0.05) in the atracurium group and 0.41 +/- 0.16 (P less than 0.01) in the vecuronium group. We conclude that (1) the facial muscles (OOM) recover earlier than the hypothenar muscles (ADM) and (2) an EMG T4/T1 = 0.70 in the facial muscles may not indicate adequate recovery of neuromuscular function.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neuromuscular blocking agents are frequently used in the Intensive Care Unit to facilitate tracheal intubation and the application of continuous paralysis. This review will focus on various conditions of the critically ill patient such as multi-organ dysfunction, acid-base and electrolyte imbalance, prolonged immobility, multiple drug interactions and specific disease/injury processes that may affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behaviour of muscle relaxants. As such, due to the complex nature of the critically ill patients, the effects of neuromuscular blocking agents are unpredictable. Therefore, guidelines regarding their administration and the methodology and requirement for continuous bedside monitoring of neuromuscular function will be presented.
    Preview · Article · Dec 1992 · Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia

  • No preview · Article · Jun 1994 · Baillière s Clinical Anaesthesiology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study the applicability of the electromyographical method for monitoring neuromuscular transmission during anaesthesia has been investigated. The purpose was to determine the stability and temperature dependence of the EMG and to evaluate and compare EMG area, amplitude and duration during a non-depolarizing neuromuscular block in the tibialis anterior muscle preparation of the cat. Further, in clinical studies the purpose was to investigate differential hand muscle sensitivity to non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents based on the EMG and the standard adductor pollicis mechanomyogram, and to establish the agreement between the electromyographical and the mechanomyographical methods and their relationship to clinical parameters of residual neuromuscular block. For this purpose a new monitoring equipment was developed for simultaneous recording of the evoked mechanomyogram and the surface compound EMG area, amplitude and duration. In the animal studies the EMG was found to be stable with changes less than 10% during 3 hours of stimulation and with a high degree of reproducibility. In contrast, the mechanomyogram proved unstable over time with changes of 35-50% (positive staircase) within minutes after onset of stimulation followed by a slower decline of the response to 70-75% of control. An inverse relationship was found between temperature and both the mechanomyogram and the EMG, the EMG area and duration being more affected (5-7% per degrees C) than EMG amplitude (2-3% per degrees C). During onset and recovery from non-depolarizing neuromuscular block, EMG area and amplitude of the first major negative deflection and of the total compound response both reflected neuromuscular transmission equally. The EMG duration was found to be unsuitable as a predictor of neuromuscular block. In the clinical studies of the hand muscles (adductor pollicis, hypothenar and first dorsal interosseous muscles) small but clinically insignificant differences in EMG-based sensitivity to pancuronium were observed. There was no difference between EMG area and amplitude in the estimated effective doses of pancuronium and roctronium producing 50% and 90% block, respectively (ED50 and ED90), but EMG-based sensitivity of the adductor pollicis muscle was less than when based on mechanomyography. Comparative analysis of first dorsal interosseous EMG and adductor pollicis mechanomyogram during non-depolarizing neuromuscular block was based on the concept of bias (mean difference between the results by the two methods) and limits of agreement (an estimation of how much results obtained with one method are likely to differ from the results of the other method) and evaluated during TOF nerve stimulation. The two methods agreed within acceptable limits during neuromuscular block with estimated bias being less than 2% during onset. A variable bias of 3-7% was observed during recovery, with EMG overestimating block at 25% recovery and underestimating block at 75% and 90% recovery. Limits of agreement were more narrow during onset (+/- 7-8%) than during recovery (+/- 12-17%), EMG area and amplitude equally reflected the degree of neuromascular block. First dorsal interosseous EMG TOF ratio recovered more slowly than TOF ratio of the adductor pollicis mechanomyogram during early recovery. The relationship between the two methods was described as being log-linear, and during late recovery bias between the TOF ratios of the two methods was zero. However, due to the range of deviations between the EMG and the mechanomyogram, EMG TOF ratios down to 0.55 or up to 0.90 in some patients were found to be compatible with adequate recovery of a mechanomyographical TOF ratio of 0.75. Differences between electromyographical and mechanomyographical TOF ratios in their relation to 5 s sustained headlift were only revealed when the TOF ratio was below 0.50-0.60. More patients were then able to perform the test if the TOF ratio was measured from the EMG.(ABSTRACT T
    No preview · Article · Oct 1996 · Danish medical bulletin
Show more