Nowadays, artificial intelligence and related technologies have been widely applied in many areas of people's daily lives, while also being mutually integrated and adapted with laws, morality, and ethics. In the real-world scenario of filling out forms, there are various types of stakeholders involved, which involve legal ethics, equity exchange, and transfer situations, resulting in a game between form makers and form fillers. From the perspective of the form fillers, common problems may arise such as repetitive or incorrect entries, inconvenience, information leakage, or conflicting purpose. The form makers may have their own purpose, but due to their lack of understanding or disregard for legal and ethical content, discrimination and bias may exist in the data, information, and knowledge aimed at different form fillers. Furthermore, existing automatic form-filling technologies are limited by inconsistent, incomplete, inaccurate, and insufficient content resources, and different stakeholders have cognitive differences, which leads to the AI form-filling decision process being limited to simple data or information transfer and facing issues of reliability and interpretability.
This article discusses the reliability of AI automated decision-making in the above situations. Based on the DIKWP theory and technology, the purpose system is used to drive the fusion analysis of the content-cognition system of all parties in the intelligent form-filling interaction process. This is done to address the specific issues of inconsistency, incompleteness, inaccuracy, and insufficiency of the obtained content resources (F-N problem). At the same time, a form-filling interaction governance evaluation model is constructed, aiming to responsibly evaluate the compliance utility, privacy security, and fairness of the form, and to improve the reliability and credibility of automatic form-filling decision-making. The main work and innovation points of this article are as follows:
First, in response to the F-N problem of content resources and the cognitive differences of the research object, a homogenization analysis is conducted on the object's DIKWP system in the form-filling interaction process. A cross-domain linkage and transformation mechanism is established to reduce the uncertainty of the content, while also constructing essential content alignment between different systems, making essential existence judgments, analyzing content consistency, and establishing semantic structure correlations to mitigate the differences issue.
Second, the construction of the purpose model of the form-filling interaction object is described in detail. An analysis is conducted on the relationships within a single purpose system and between multiple purpose systems, and a competitive handling mechanism is designed to establish priorities. Additionally, a form-filling interaction value model is constructed, and DIKWP logic is used to redefine and analyze possible biases in the form-filling scenario. At the same time, a governance evaluation system for the form is constructed and supplemented, and specific evaluations are carried out based on compliance utility, privacy security, and fairness and impartiality.
Third, A DIKWP-based combination search and ranking strategy is designed using the DIKWP framework, which is based on purpose sequences. The form's multi-purpose search process is modeled as a continuous topological structure on the user's content-cognition map, and search efficiency is improved through purpose association priority search and partial order constraint subgraph pruning search. In the personal information form-filling scenario, content sorting and filling are carried out based on user purpose constraints and subjective wisdom value judgment, achieving the reliability of automatic form-filling.