The dietary habits of the early hominids Australopithecus and Paranthropus have long been debated. Robinson argued that the two species differed in the proportions of meat and vegetables consumed. More recently it has been suggested that Paranthropus, with its presumably larger body size, simply processed greater amounts of the same foods eaten by Australopithecus to maintain 'functional equivalence'. Microscopic dental wear patterns are related to the dietary habits of extant mammals, and quantification of these patterns is useful in distinguishing among primates with different diets. Nevertheless, few attempts have been made to use microwear in the reconstruction of early hominid diets, and only very recently has the quantification of such data been initiated. While microwear fabrics can be reduced to individual elements (for example, scratches and pits), there is some disagreement over exactly how they should be defined and measured. Fourier transforms have been applied successfully in the study of a variety of physical and biological patterns, and recently they have been used to characterize and distinguish different tooth wear patterns more objectively. Here we report the first combined use of image processing and other quantitative techniques to analyse the dental microwear of early hominids. Our results suggest that Paranthropus ate substantially more hard food items than Australopithecus.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.
"The main aim of this research is to comparatively assess the evolutionary changes, biogeographic habitats, and dietary habits of the above-mentioned suid species, following methodologies of morphometric systematics, tooth microwear (Solounias and Semprebon, 2002) and statistical analysis mainly on the dentognathic specimens. The study of tooth wear on extinct and extant mammal species is significant in the interpretation of diets and ecological reconstructions following pioneering works of a number of researchers (Walker, 1976; Walker et al., 1978; Ryan, 1981; Rose, 1983; Grine, 1986 Grine, , 1987 Grine and Kay, 1988; Teaford and Oyen, 1989; Teaford and Robinson, 1989; Ungar, 1994 Ungar, , 1996 Ungar and Teaford, 1996; Solounias and Semprebon, 2002; Rivals et al., 2008; Teaford, 2007; Rivals et al., 2009; Solounias et al., 2010). Rapid speciation in suids and adaptations have been studied from the point of view of their dental morphology, stable isotope composition (Harris and Cerling, 2002 ), and postcranial anatomy (Bishop, 1994Bishop, , 1999 ). "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract]ABSTRACT: The fossiliferous late Early Pleistocene deposits of the Buia Basin (dated to c. 1Ma) at the Danakil depression, contain three different suid species (Kolpochoerus olduvaiensis, Kolpochoerus majus, and Metridiochoerus modestus).These suid taxa are morphologically evolved and are found in association with a diverse large vertebrate faunal assemblage, including the genus Homoand a rich accumulation of Acheulean tools. The anatomic, biometric,morphometric and dental microwear analyses, showsignificant data of dietary traits, habitat and evolutionary changes. In suids, despite their omnivorous diets, microwear study can play a significant role in understanding dietary habits. The results of our study show morphological distinction between the three suid species. Conversely, the microwear patterns recorded on the dental surfaces show overlapping of ecological niches among the species. We believe that their opportunistic feeding and rapid reproduction process might have sustained their survival within the mosaic environments of the Buia Basin in competition with other faunas (other ungulates, carnivores and monkeys) and hominins.
"Microwear, the analysis of microscopic tooth wear, has been widely used as a method of paleoecological reconstruction (Grine, 1986; Grine and Kay, 1988; Solounias et al., 1988 Solounias et al., , 2010 Solounias and Semprebon, 2002; Merceron et al., 2004 Merceron et al., , 2005 Fraser and Theodor, 2013) and determining selective forces (e.g. climate and diet factors) responsible for various mammalian adaptations (e.g. "
"Conventional wisdom has it that hard foods are fractured in compression (normal, axial loading), leaving residual pits on the enamel surface, whereas soft foods are ground down in shear (sliding , translational loading), leaving scratches. Individual microcontact signals typically occur on a width scale of 1–20 lm  . The ratio of pits to scratches is taken as a measure of diet: some teeth show either scratches or pits, suggesting specialist diets; others show both scratches and pits, suggesting more omnivorous diets. "