... It was even suggested at the time that the molecular processes that underlie learning and encode new memories may be ''continuous across the phyla (as genetic codes are) and therefore would be reasonably similar for a protozoan and a mammal" (Gershman et al., 2021;Gelber, 1962). These ideas were largely abandoned in the 1970s (Gaito, 1976;Glassman, 1969;Ungar, 1973;Uphouse et al., 1974) but have been rekindled in recent years (Gallistel, 2017;Langille and Gallistel, 2020;Mattick and Mehler, 2008;Abraham et al., 2019;Gallistel, 2018;Gallistel and Balsam, 2014;Queenan et al., 2017). The recent revival is rooted in the sobering realization that current theories of synaptic plasticity and network activity cannot explain learning, memory, and cognition (Gallistel and King, 2009;Gallistel and Matzel, 2013) and that several lines of evidence bring into question the theory that synaptic strengthening/weakening is the primary form of long-term information storage in the brain (Gallistel, 2017;Cai et al., 2012;Daou and Margoliash, 2020;Jirenhed et al., 2017;Johansson et al., 2014;Johansson et al., 2015;Pearce et al., 2017;Poo et al., 2016;Ryan et al., 2015;Santin and Schulz, 2019;Zhao et al., 2019). ...