ArticlePublisher preview available

Parental interference and romantic love: The Romeo and Juliet effect

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Administered questionnaires to 140 couples to test the hypotheses that (a) feelings of love become more highly correlated with trust and acceptance as relationships develop through time and (b) parental interference in a love relationship intensifies the feelings of romantic love between members of the couple. The 1st hypothesis was derived from the authors' conceptualization of love and distinctions between romantic and "conjugal" love. Affirmation of this hypothesis was found, supporting a methodology for operationalizing romantic love. The 2nd hypothesis was derived from classical literature and small group dynamics, and was explained in terms of the motivating effect of frustration and reactance. This hypothesis was also supported, using both cross-sectional and longitudinal change score correlations. Possible relationship dynamics associated with parental interference and trust are discussed. Findings are applied to cross-cultural variations in the occurrence of romantic love. (15 ref.)
Journal
of
Personality
and
Social
Psychology
1972,
Vol.
24, No. 1,
1-10
PARENTAL
INTERFERENCE
AND
ROMANTIC LOVE:
THE
ROMEO
AND
JULIET
EFFECT1
RICHARD DRISCOLL,2
KEITH
E.
DAVIS,8
AND
MILTON
E.
LIPETZ*
University
of
Colorado
The two
hypotheses tested were
that
(a)
feelings
of
love become more highly
correlated with trust
and
acceptance
as
relationships develop through time;
and (6)
parental interference
in a
love
relationship intensifies
the
feelings
of
romantic love between members
of the
couple.
The first
hypothesis
was
derived
from
our
conceptualization
of
love
and
distinctions between romantic
and
"conjugal" love.
Affirmation
of
this hypothesis supported
a
methodology
for
operationalizing
romantic love.
The
second hypothesis
was
derived
from
classi-
cal
literature
and
small group
dynamics,
and was
explained
in
terms
of two
theoretical
principles, namely,
the
motivating
effect
of
frustration
and
reac-
tance. This hypothesis
was
also supported, using both cross-sectional
and
longitudinal change score correlations. Plausible alternatives
to
this hypothe-
sis
were
examined
and
then eliminated through further
analyses.
Possible
relationship dynamics associated with parental
interference
and
trust were dis-
cussed.
Finally,
the findings
were applied
to
cross-cultural variations
in the
occurrence
of
romantic love.
Romantic
love
can be
thought
of as a
dis-
tinct
form
of
interpersonal
attraction
that
occurs
between
opposite-sex
partners
under
specifiable
social
conditions.
Though
romantic
love
is
considered
to be an
important
and
meaningful
experience
by
many
members
of
our
culture,
little
research
has
been done
with
respect
to the
social
conditions
associated
with
variations
in
feelings
of
love.
This
may be
due
in
part
to the
difficulties
inherent
in at-
taining
adequate
methodological
control
over
the
process
being
studied,
and to not
having
developed
any
acceptable
conceptualization
of
what
is
meant
by
love.
The
present
study
explores
the
relation
be-
tween
one
type
of
influence
on a
heterosexual
relationship—parental
interference—and
love
in
the
relationship.
The
primary
hypothesis
was
derived
from
several
separate
but
con-
1
This
study
was
supported
by
National
Institute
of
Mental Health Grant
R03 MH
17663-01
and a
grant
from
the
University
of
Colorado's
Council
on
Research
and
Creative Work
to
Keith
E.
Davis
and
Milton
E.
Lipetz,
principal investigators.
2
Requests
for
reprints should
be
sent
to
Richard
Driscoll, Department
of
Psychology, University
of
Colorado,
Boulder, Colorado 80302.
8
Now at the
Department
of
Psychology, Living-
ston College, Rutgers University.
4
The
authors
are
indebted
to
John Foward, Paul
Rosenblatt,
Zick Rubin,
and
Robert Ryder
for
their
helpful
critical comments
on an
earlier version
of
this manuscript.
vergent
sources:
the
classical
literature
on
romantic
love,
studies
of
group
reactions
to
external
opposition,
and two
generalized theo-
retical
principles.
All of
these
considerations,
which will
be
more fully
elaborated,
lead
to
the
same
hypothesis:
parental
interference
in
a
love
relationship
intensifies
the
feelings
of
romantic
love
between
members
of the
couple.
A
balanced
presentation
should
acknowl-
edge
that
there
are
competing
theories
which
would
predict
that
parental
interference
should reduce
the
positive
aspects
of the
rela-
tionship,
and
thus
reduce feelings
of
love.
The
application
of
reinforcement
principles
would
suggest
that
romantic
feelings
that
are
not
reinforced
or are
punished
(by the
parents'
disapproval)
would
decrease
in in-
tensity.
The
frustration-aggression
principle
would
suggest
that
the
frustrations
produced
by
parental
interference would
lead
to
aggres-
sion
that
could
be
displaced
onto
one's
mate,
who
is a
safer
and
more
available
object
for
such
aggression,
and
that
such
conflict would
result
in a
diminution
of
love.
The
range
of
applicability
of
such
seemingly
incompatible
principles
is,
of
course,
a
major focus
of
this
study.
Parental
Interference
and
Romantic
Love
Classical
sources.
Romantic
love
has
been
the
subject
of
countless
literary
efforts.
... In the domain of romantic relationships, a series of experimental/controlled studies designed to test predictions of EIT con rmed the anticipated cubic e ects of deterrence on the intensity of partners' feelings (e.g., Miron et al., 2009;. These experiments not only have provided further and converging support for EIT but also a unitary and coherent theoretical explanation for all the contrasting ndings that have been accumulating on the causes of in-pair divestment (e.g., Driscoll et al., 1972;Felmlee, 2001;Lehmiller & Agnew, 2006;Sinclair & Ellithorpe, 2014). In the next section, we review and discuss the most relevant empirical evidence at our disposal in this respect. ...
... By adopting the perspective of EIT (Brehm, 1999), we can realize that obstacles and barriers-traditionally conceptualized as detrimental for in-pair feelings and the fate of the relationship (e.g., Levinger, 1999;Rusbult, 1980)-can function, rather, as "motivators" and be even bene cial for partners' reciprocal feelings of romantic attachment (Brehm, 1999;Brehm & Self, 1989; H. F. Wright, 1937). In light of this perspective, all of the mixed e ects accidentally found by previous researchthat is, empirical evidence not purposely designed to test Brehm's EIT (e.g., Driscoll et al., 1972;)-appear now to be plausible and coherent. As we have seen, the e ects of obstacles on romantic feelings depend on a combination of detailed circumstances. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
How do in-pair obstacles and difficulties affect the intensity of love? Why do people at some points in their romantic relationships emotionally disinvest? Does a reduction in the intensity of romantic feelings always result in relationship breakup? Core assumptions of emotional intensity theory suggest that feelings of love vary in strength according to an adaptive “energy conservation” principle. To save energy, romantic partners automatically adapt the intensity of their feelings to the minimum level needed to overcome the obstacles and difficulties the couple encounters daily (e.g., reciprocal partners’ flaws, relational stress, and perceived risk of breakup), because small relationship obstacles and difficulties only demand the investment of correspondingly small quantities of motivational/emotional resources to be surmounted. Thus, romantic feelings appear to diminish when obstacles are almost absent and, by contrast, to augment when obstacles grow stronger—with emotional strength reflecting the magnitude of what challenges the stability of the relationship. This specific fine-tuning of emotion intensity holds up, however, only to the point where maintaining the relationship is still worth the effort. Beyond this point, actual in-pair divestment occurs, because any further investment of energy would represent a useless (i.e., non-functional) waste of energy. In adopting the perspective of emotional intensity theory, this chapter reviews the most relevant empirical evidence on romantic relationships in light of a unitary, single-process explanation that reconciles past conflicting findings while also addressing new theoretical and practical implications for contemporary romantic partnerships.
... Second, the principle of scarcity (Cialdini, 1985;Lynn, 1992) suggests that artificial scarcity can enhance the desirability of a commodity, because we have learned to associate scarcity with quality. 13 For example, 2-year-olds are significantly more interested in playing with toys when they are placed behind a barrier that restricts their access (Brehm & Weintraub, 1977); people become significantly more interested in information when it is being censored by authorities (e.g., Worchel & Arnold, 1973; and there is a documented Romeo and Juliet effect (Driscoll, Davis, & Lipetz, 1972), in which young couples experience heightened feelings of romance as parental interference in their relationship increases. Third, forbidden fruit effects might reflect a disposition for risk (Lopes, 1987;Streufert, 1986) or sensation (Zuckerman, Buchsbaum, & Murphy, 1980) seeking; some individuals may have a heightened attraction to the thrill and mystery of psychoactive drugs and a diminished fear of the legal risks that accompany them. ...
Article
Full-text available
There is an ongoing American policy debate about the appropriate legal status for psychoactive drugs. Prohibition, decriminalization, and legalization positions are all premised on assumptions about the behavioral effects of drug laws. What is actually known and not known about these effects is reviewed. Rational-choice models of legal compliance suggest that criminalization reduces use through restricted drug availability, increased drug prices, and the deterrent effect of the risk of punishment. Research on these effects illustrates the need for a more realistic perspective that acknowledges the limitations of human rationality and the importance of moral reasoning and informal social control factors. There are at least 7 different mechanisms by which the law influences drug use, some of which are unintended and counterproductive. This framework is used to explore the potential behavioral effects of decriminalization and legalization.
... Bran falls in love with the Reverend Dimmesdale while alone and gives birth to a daughter, Pearl. Bran is publicly shamed by wearing a red "A" symbolizing "adultery" for public display [8]. Bran, on the other hand, is steadfast in his refusal to reveal the child's father. ...
Article
Full-text available
We conducted a replication and extension of Driscoll, Davis, and Lipetz’s (1972) classic longitudinal survey of the Romeo and Juliet effect, wherein they found that increases in parental interference were linked to increases in love and commitment. Using the original measures, 396 participants were followed over a 3–4 month period wherein they reported love, commitment, trust, and criticism for their partners as well as levels of perceived interference from friends and family. Participants also completed contemporary, validated measures of the same constructs similar to those often implemented in studies of social network opinion. Repeating the analyses employed by Driscoll and colleagues, we could not find evidence for the Romeo and Juliet effect. Rather, consistent with the social network effect (Felmlee, 2001), participants reporting higher levels of interference or lower levels of approval reported poorer relationship quality regardless of outcome measured. This effect was likewise evident in a meta-analysis.