ArticlePublisher preview available

Parental interference and romantic love: The Romeo and Juliet effect

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Administered questionnaires to 140 couples to test the hypotheses that (a) feelings of love become more highly correlated with trust and acceptance as relationships develop through time and (b) parental interference in a love relationship intensifies the feelings of romantic love between members of the couple. The 1st hypothesis was derived from the authors' conceptualization of love and distinctions between romantic and "conjugal" love. Affirmation of this hypothesis was found, supporting a methodology for operationalizing romantic love. The 2nd hypothesis was derived from classical literature and small group dynamics, and was explained in terms of the motivating effect of frustration and reactance. This hypothesis was also supported, using both cross-sectional and longitudinal change score correlations. Possible relationship dynamics associated with parental interference and trust are discussed. Findings are applied to cross-cultural variations in the occurrence of romantic love. (15 ref.)
Journal
of
Personality
and
Social
Psychology
1972,
Vol.
24, No. 1,
1-10
PARENTAL
INTERFERENCE
AND
ROMANTIC LOVE:
THE
ROMEO
AND
JULIET
EFFECT1
RICHARD DRISCOLL,2
KEITH
E.
DAVIS,8
AND
MILTON
E.
LIPETZ*
University
of
Colorado
The two
hypotheses tested were
that
(a)
feelings
of
love become more highly
correlated with trust
and
acceptance
as
relationships develop through time;
and (6)
parental interference
in a
love
relationship intensifies
the
feelings
of
romantic love between members
of the
couple.
The first
hypothesis
was
derived
from
our
conceptualization
of
love
and
distinctions between romantic
and
"conjugal" love.
Affirmation
of
this hypothesis supported
a
methodology
for
operationalizing
romantic love.
The
second hypothesis
was
derived
from
classi-
cal
literature
and
small group
dynamics,
and was
explained
in
terms
of two
theoretical
principles, namely,
the
motivating
effect
of
frustration
and
reac-
tance. This hypothesis
was
also supported, using both cross-sectional
and
longitudinal change score correlations. Plausible alternatives
to
this hypothe-
sis
were
examined
and
then eliminated through further
analyses.
Possible
relationship dynamics associated with parental
interference
and
trust were dis-
cussed.
Finally,
the findings
were applied
to
cross-cultural variations
in the
occurrence
of
romantic love.
Romantic
love
can be
thought
of as a
dis-
tinct
form
of
interpersonal
attraction
that
occurs
between
opposite-sex
partners
under
specifiable
social
conditions.
Though
romantic
love
is
considered
to be an
important
and
meaningful
experience
by
many
members
of
our
culture,
little
research
has
been done
with
respect
to the
social
conditions
associated
with
variations
in
feelings
of
love.
This
may be
due
in
part
to the
difficulties
inherent
in at-
taining
adequate
methodological
control
over
the
process
being
studied,
and to not
having
developed
any
acceptable
conceptualization
of
what
is
meant
by
love.
The
present
study
explores
the
relation
be-
tween
one
type
of
influence
on a
heterosexual
relationship—parental
interference—and
love
in
the
relationship.
The
primary
hypothesis
was
derived
from
several
separate
but
con-
1
This
study
was
supported
by
National
Institute
of
Mental Health Grant
R03 MH
17663-01
and a
grant
from
the
University
of
Colorado's
Council
on
Research
and
Creative Work
to
Keith
E.
Davis
and
Milton
E.
Lipetz,
principal investigators.
2
Requests
for
reprints should
be
sent
to
Richard
Driscoll, Department
of
Psychology, University
of
Colorado,
Boulder, Colorado 80302.
8
Now at the
Department
of
Psychology, Living-
ston College, Rutgers University.
4
The
authors
are
indebted
to
John Foward, Paul
Rosenblatt,
Zick Rubin,
and
Robert Ryder
for
their
helpful
critical comments
on an
earlier version
of
this manuscript.
vergent
sources:
the
classical
literature
on
romantic
love,
studies
of
group
reactions
to
external
opposition,
and two
generalized theo-
retical
principles.
All of
these
considerations,
which will
be
more fully
elaborated,
lead
to
the
same
hypothesis:
parental
interference
in
a
love
relationship
intensifies
the
feelings
of
romantic
love
between
members
of the
couple.
A
balanced
presentation
should
acknowl-
edge
that
there
are
competing
theories
which
would
predict
that
parental
interference
should reduce
the
positive
aspects
of the
rela-
tionship,
and
thus
reduce feelings
of
love.
The
application
of
reinforcement
principles
would
suggest
that
romantic
feelings
that
are
not
reinforced
or are
punished
(by the
parents'
disapproval)
would
decrease
in in-
tensity.
The
frustration-aggression
principle
would
suggest
that
the
frustrations
produced
by
parental
interference would
lead
to
aggres-
sion
that
could
be
displaced
onto
one's
mate,
who
is a
safer
and
more
available
object
for
such
aggression,
and
that
such
conflict would
result
in a
diminution
of
love.
The
range
of
applicability
of
such
seemingly
incompatible
principles
is,
of
course,
a
major focus
of
this
study.
Parental
Interference
and
Romantic
Love
Classical
sources.
Romantic
love
has
been
the
subject
of
countless
literary
efforts.
... Specifically, research has shown that generally social network approval leads to more satisfying relationships while disapproval leads to less satisfying relationships, at least when that opinion comes from friends. Findings have been less consistent about the impact of parental opinion, particularly parental disapproval (Driscoll, Davis, & Lipetz, 1972;Felmlee, 2001). Thus research has yet to conclude what it is that makes an individual decide who they listen to for relationship appraisals. ...
... Other studies, however, have found that disapproval can have a positive impact on romantic relationships (Driscoll et al., 1972). The idea of disapproving parents leading a couple to become more engrossed in each other is not a new topic when it comes to fiction. ...
... Conversely, those who have found the Romeo and Juliet effect have found it to exist only for parental opinions. Parental disapproval had a positive impact on love in romantic relationships (Driscoll et al., 1972) and increased the odds of couple members remaining in the relationship (Felmlee, 2001). No such effects have ever been found for friend disapproval. ...
... Reactance Theory (Brehm, 1966(Brehm, , 1972 suggests that if people experience a reduction or elimination of their freedom (which is defined as the perceived ability to engage in a chosen behavior at any moment), they will be motivated to restore their freedom. A classic example of reactance is the Romeo and Juliet effect (Driscoll et al., 1972). When parents oppose a child's relationship, their opposition will lead their children to intensify the relationship. ...
Article
Full-text available
The effect of threats on endorsement of freedom has rarely been studied. Studies on hierarchy and uncertainty have implied that people may forsake freedom to gain certainty and control. The research described in this article aimed to test the idea that threats make people endorse freedom less because they make insecurity more salient, which in turn draws attention to the negative aspects of freedom. Two studies tested the hypothesis that threats will be negatively associated with endorsement of different freedoms. People indicated less endorsement of Positive Freedom (i.e., freedom to behave and autonomy) and Negative Freedom (i.e., freedom from interference and restrictions) after versus before the outbreak of COVID-19 (Study 1). Experimentally manipulated threats decreased endorsement of freedom through the perception that freedom is less positive and important (Study 2). These results suggest that even in a country like the United States, where freedom is greatly valued, threats can lessen people's endorsement of freedom.
... However, for age, we noticed that age had a significant positive correlation with both romantic and realistic attitudes. This result suggests that romantic and realistic attitudes may exist simultaneously, and both romantic and realistic attitudes can be high or low at the same time and are not necessarily mutually exclusive (Driscoll et al., 1972). Inconsistent with many studies (Botwin et al., 1997;Erevik et al., 2019;Munro, 1976), our data showed a significant positive correlation between realistic attitudes and extroversion, while romantic attitudes had no significant correlation with extroversion. ...
Article
Full-text available
College is a significant transition in the growth of individuals, and romantic relationships play an important role in the future development of individuals. Understanding young people’s attitudes toward love is helpful for formulating strategies to guide them to form correct attitudes toward love, promote the formation of positive and healthy attitudes toward marriage and life. This study aimed to explore the trajectories of college students’ attitudes toward love, reveal the development law of their attitudes toward love, and identify the influencing factors that lead to changes in their attitudes toward love. Descriptive and correlation analyses were performed on participants’ attitudes toward love, followed by utilization of a growth mixture model to explore latent trajectory classes and a multinomial logistic regression model to analyze influencing factors across trajectories.The results indicated that romantic attitudes could be divided into three groups: “high-increasing”, “low-decreasing” and “low-increasing”, and realistic attitudes could be divided into three groups: “high-increasing”, “low-increasing” and “high-decreasing”. Gender, major, extroversion, and hometown location were factors influencing whether students fell into different trajectory classes. Overall, society and colleges should pay more attention to changes in college students’ attitudes toward love, provide timely intervention and guidance, and prevent them from suffering from behavioral, physical, and psychological problems.
... Second, the principle of scarcity (Cialdini, 1985;Lynn, 1992) suggests that artificial scarcity can enhance the desirability of a commodity, because we have learned to associate scarcity with quality. 13 For example, 2-year-olds are significantly more interested in playing with toys when they are placed behind a barrier that restricts their access (Brehm & Weintraub, 1977); people become significantly more interested in information when it is being censored by authorities (e.g., Worchel & Arnold, 1973; and there is a documented Romeo and Juliet effect (Driscoll, Davis, & Lipetz, 1972), in which young couples experience heightened feelings of romance as parental interference in their relationship increases. Third, forbidden fruit effects might reflect a disposition for risk (Lopes, 1987;Streufert, 1986) or sensation (Zuckerman, Buchsbaum, & Murphy, 1980) seeking; some individuals may have a heightened attraction to the thrill and mystery of psychoactive drugs and a diminished fear of the legal risks that accompany them. ...
Article
Full-text available
There is an ongoing American policy debate about the appropriate legal status for psychoactive drugs. Prohibition, decriminalization, and legalization positions are all premised on assumptions about the behavioral effects of drug laws. What is actually known and not known about these effects is reviewed. Rational-choice models of legal compliance suggest that criminalization reduces use through restricted drug availability, increased drug prices, and the deterrent effect of the risk of punishment. Research on these effects illustrates the need for a more realistic perspective that acknowledges the limitations of human rationality and the importance of moral reasoning and informal social control factors. There are at least 7 different mechanisms by which the law influences drug use, some of which are unintended and counterproductive. This framework is used to explore the potential behavioral effects of decriminalization and legalization.
Chapter
This chapter draws from the terms and methods of Writing Across the Curriculum to theorize four centuries of interdisciplinary scholarly engagement with Shakespeare. Sometimes scholars obnoxiously cite Shakespeare’s quotable quotes out of context, but there’s also a more compelling history to be told of Shakespeare both receiving and generating new knowledge in fields outside literary studies. This story is framed by the development of academic disciplinarity from the classical age to Shakespeare’s day as well as the modernization of the disciplines leading up to our time. Key readings range from Shakespeare’s own depiction of academic disciplinarity in The Taming of the Shrew, early political appropriations like John Milton’s Eikonoklastes, and the rise of historicism with Charlotte Lennox in the eighteenth century, to nineteenth-century entomologists, twentieth-century psychologists, and twenty-first-century computer scientists. Emphasis is placed on the rise of “studies” disciplines—such as women’s studies, disability studies, and post-colonial studies—plus the prospects of interdisciplinary collaboration, positional knowledge, and public writing outside academia.