‘A Comparison of Outcomes Between Joint and Physician Only Obstetric Practices.’

Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
Birth (Impact Factor: 1.26). 01/1995; 21(4):197-205. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1994.tb00530.x
Source: PubMed


Since 1981, the cesarean birth rate of a joint practice has been consistently lower than that of physician-only practices at a private community hospital in Yolo County, California. This study sought to determine whether differences in perinatal outcomes were influenced by women's use of a joint versus a physician-only practice or were associated with parity, maternal age, or newborn birthweight. Data from the hospital's 1634 consecutive singleton births in 1990 were examined, using a prospective concurrent analytic cohort study design. Chi square statistics and stepwise logistic regressions were used for data analysis. The joint practice had a significantly lower rate of total cesarean births (9.3%) compared with the physician-only practices (17.7%); the frequencies of severe lacerations were 1.0 percent and 6.4 percent, respectively. No significant differences were found in parity, birthweight, or newborn outcomes in the two types of practice. Type of practice was the major determinant of cesarean birth (p < 0.0001). All variables studied, including type of practice, were significant determinants of primary cesarean birth. Parity and practice type were significant determinants of third- and fourth-degree lacerations (p < 0.0001). The type of practice from which women receive care is significantly associated with both method of birth and possibility of severe perineal trauma.

1 Follower
2 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As we approach the 21st century, the prospect of a new healthcare system in the United States should prompt us to reopen the question of who can best meet the healthcare needs of women. Nurse midwives are advanced practice nurses educated in the field of primary health care for essentially normal women and newborns. Their focus is wellness and health education. Once patients are introduced to the concept of a nurse practitioner and the services provided, the majority are satisfied with the quality of the care received. Evidence suggests that women, if given a choice, prefer the ministrations of a female practitioner over that of a male for their intimate healthcare needs. As a predominantly female group, nurse midwives are an excellent source of qualified providers for women. In this article, the cost effectiveness of nurse practitioner care and the issue of provider gender are discussed. A case for the utilization of nurse midwives as primary healthcare providers for women is presented.
    No preview · Article · Jun 1996 · Clinical Nurse Specialist
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Our purpose was to determine (1) whether risk factors for intraamniotic infection were similar in women delivered of preterm infants versus term infants and (2) whether infection control techniques could decrease the incidence of intrapartum fever on a labor and delivery unit. A total of 5409 consecutive patients (group 1) admitted to the Medical College of Virginia's labor and delivery unit were followed up prospectively to determine the development of intraamniotic infection. Demographic and intrapartum data were collected by use of a standard data form by infection control practitioners. An additional 2549 consecutive patients (group 2) were followed up after institution of infection-control measures. Intraamniotic infection occurred in 416 of 5399 (7.7%) women (group 1) admitted to the labor and delivery suite. Odds ratios for term and preterm patients having intraamniotic infection with rupture of membranes > or = 12 hours compared with < 12 hours were 5.81 (95% confidence interval 512 to 6.59 and 2.49 (95% confidence interval 1.77 to 3.50), respectively. Odds ratios for term and preterm patients with internal monitors having intraamniotic infection compared with patients in whom internal monitors were not used were 2.01 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 2.4) and 1.42 (95% confidence interval 0.99 to 2.04), respectively. Odds ratios for term and preterm patients having intraamniotic infection with more than four vaginal examinations compared with four or fewer vaginal examinations was 3.07 (95% confidence interval 2.53-3.73) and 1.59 (95% confidence interval 1.11-2.27), respectively. Intrapartum fever occurred in 475 (8.8%) women in group 1 and in 252 (9.8%) women in group 2 (not significant). Risk factors (duration of ruptured membranes, use of internal monitoring, number of vaginal examinations) were similar in both term and preterm women with intraamniotic infection. Infection control measures failed to decrease the incidence of intrapartum fever in our patient population.
    No preview · Article · Aug 1996 · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This pilot study was designed to describe the clinical areas of collaboration, financial structures, and sources of conflict for certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) involved in nurse-midwife and physician collaborative practice (CP). A questionnaire was posted on an electronic bulletin board maintained by the Community-Based Nurse Midwifery Education Program of the Frontier School of Nursing. The nonrandom, convenience sample consisted of 78 respondents. Their mean age was 42 years; they had been in practice for a mean of 10 years, and 56% had graduate degrees. Eighty-nine percent reported involvement in CP. Eighty-three percent co-managed higher-risk women, and 46% performed vacuum-assisted deliveries or were first assistants at cesarean sections. Forty-eight percent of CNMs did not bill in their own names, and only 12% had full hospital privileges. The most common sources of conflict in CPs were clinical practice issues (100% ever encountered), power inequities (92%), financial issues (66%), and gender relations (58%). Collaborative practice is a common form of practice for CNMs and suggests a model for collaboration in other sectors of the health care system. Future research should explore methods of reducing the potential for conflict between CNMs and physicians.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 1997 · Journal of Nurse-Midwifery
Show more