ArticlePublisher preview available

Public Outpatient Mental Health Services: Use and Outcome Among Asian Americans

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Use of public outpatient mental health services and treatment outcomes were studied among Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, Korean, and Southeast-Asian Americans in Los Angeles County. Filipinos were underrepresented in the system, whereas Southeast Asians were overrepresented and had higher utilization rates, but showed less improvement, than did the other groups. The influence of therapist-client ethnic match and of clinicians' professional status were assessed, and recommendations are made for further research based on present findings.
Amer.
J.
Orthopychiat.
64(3),
July
1994
PUBLIC OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES:
Use and Outcome Among Asian Americans
Yu-Wen Ying,
Ph.D.,
and Li-tze Hu,
Ph.D.
Use
of
public outpatient mental health services and treatment outcomes were
studied among Chinese, Japanese,
Filipino,
Korean, and Southeast-Asian Amer-
icans in
Los
Angeles
County.
Filipinos were underrepresented in the system,
whereas Southeast Asians were overrepresented and had higher utilization rates,
but showed less improvement, than
did
the other groups. The influence
of
thera-
pist-client ethnic match and
of
clinicians 'professional status were assessed, and
recommendations are made for Jirrther research based
on
present findings.
eeting the mental health needs of the
M
diverse population of the United
States continues to be a major challenge to
mental health policy makers and providers.
A recent assessment of service use and out-
come among Asian, African, Mexican, and
white Americans
(Sue, Fujino,
Hu,
Ta-
keuchi,
&
Zane,
1991)
found that Asian
Americans underutilized mental health ser-
vices. The present investigation seeks to
examine that finding more closely by com-
paring use and treatment outcomes across
major Asian groups in the Los Angeles
public mental health system.
The size of the Asian-American popula-
tion is increasing rapidly. In Los Angeles
County, it more than doubled between
1980
and
1990
(U.S.
Bureau
of
Census,
1982,
1992).
Although Asians are gener-
ally viewed as
a
single group, they are not
homogeneous; they differ in cultural back-
ground, history, and time of migration, as
well as in acculturation level
(Tukaki,
1989;
Wong,
1982).
A recent status report by the US. Gen-
eral Accounting Office
(1990),
based on
government documents and community-
based data, demonstrated the diversity
of
Asian Americans. As shown in
TABLE
1,
Japanese Americans were found to speak
English better than all other Asian Ameri-
cans except Filipinos, to be more likely to
have been born in the United States and to
have graduated from high school (all of
which mediate greater acculturation), and
to have higher per capita income than other
Asians. In contrast, Southeast Asians (in-
cluding Vietnamese, Cambodians, Lao-
tians, and the Hmong) were the least accul-
turated, having arrived in the U.S. during
the last two decades as
a
consequence of
the wars in Southeast Asia; many came
from rural settings and have experienced
severe culture shock
(Strand
&
Jones,
A revised version
of
a paper submitted to the Journal in July
1993.
This study was supported in part by
National Institute
of
Mental Health Faculty Scholar Award
5TOl
MH19178
to the first author, and National
Institute
of
Mental Health Grant
ROI
MH44331.
Authors are at: School
of
Social Welfare, UniversirjJ
of
California at Berkeley fling); and Department
of
Psychology, University
of
Calvornia
at
Santa
Crw
(Hu).
448
0
1994
American Orthopsychiatric Association, Inc.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
... Studies that compared treatment outcomes among the major Asian American groups produced mixed findings, but most suggest differences exist between ethnic groups, although no apparent pattern emerged (Uehara et al., 1994;Ying & Hu, 1994;Zane et al., 1994). Zane et al. (1994) found no differences between Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Filipino, Vietnamese, and Laotian or Cambodian clients. ...
... Zane et al. (1994) found no differences between Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Filipino, Vietnamese, and Laotian or Cambodian clients. Ying and Hu (1994) found Southeast Asians to have significantly lower functioning levels than Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, and Korean Americans. Uehara et al. (1994) reported differences between Laotian and Chinese clients, with the former displaying lower functioning levels. ...
Article
Full-text available
We implemented a pilot study to investigate symptoms and functional outcomes of Asian Americans treated in urban community mental health centers for a diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Furthermore, we investigated whether these outcomes differed between East and Southeast Asians. We collected quantitative data from 75 participants recruited using a nonprobability sampling strategy from six urban community mental health centers. We used the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (Kay et al. in Schizophrenia Bulletin 13(2):261–276, 1987) and the Strauss and Carpenter Outcome Scale (Strauss and Carpenter in Archives of General Psychiatry 27(6):739–746, 1972) to measure their symptoms and functional outcomes. To compare the outcomes between East and Southeast Asians, we used a multivariable logistic regression model, which adjusted for the estimated effects of age, sex assigned at birth, and age at onset of illness for each outcome examined. The data shows that the treatment outcomes for this group are poor. Only a small number of participants experienced symptomatic remission (30.67%), role restoration (34.67%), and clinical recovery (21.33%). The majority of those who did not experience clinical recovery had difficulties sustaining symptomatic remission and restoring role functioning (54.67%). However, more participants achieved social restoration (68.00%). The results did not vary by national origin groups and sex assigned at birth. However, the participant’s age, the age at which the illness began, or both determined whether the treatment outcomes were favorable. Findings underscore the need for interventions that improve symptom control to increase the likelihood of other favorable outcomes.
... In reality, although these characteristics reflect the Filipino values of katatagan and katiyagaan that exhibit the resilient and persevering Filipino spirit in pursuit of the American Dream, there is an area where Filipinos unfortunately seem to be falling behind and are forgotten. Filipinos in the USA suffer from negative mental health outcomes and low rates of utilization of mental health services despite being a highly acculturated group (Gong et al., 2003;Tanaka-Konayagi, 2001;Ying & Hu, 1994). Although literature and research on the mental health help-seeking of Filipino Americans have examined this disparity (Abe- Kim et al., 2004;David, 2010;Gong et al., 2003;Martinez et al., 2020;Tuazon et al., 2019;Tuliao, 2014), its further study alongside culture-specific variables may be fundamental to decreasing the likelihood of this phenomenon's continued persistence and improve mental health outcomes for Filipino Americans. ...
... Literature on the mental health help-seeking behaviors of Asian Americans has consistently demonstrated that they are the least likely to seek mental health services (Abe- Kim et al., 2007;Brown et al., 1973;Gong et al., 2003;Kinzie & Tseng, 1978;Sue & McKinney, 1975;Ying & Hu, 1994). Filipino Americans have characteristics that increase the likelihood of mental health helpseeking. ...
Article
Full-text available
Cultural factors must be considered in the study of Filipinos in the USA. More specifically, Indigenous Filipino culture, which forms the basis of the study of Sikolohiyang Pilipino, is important as it incorporates the spiritual beliefs and practices that continue to influence Filipinos’ conceptualization of illness and healing. Given the low mental health utilization rates of Filipino Americans, it is important to examine whether Indigenous Filipino Spirituality (IFS) may impact mental health help-seeking behaviors (MHSB). In addition to spirituality, history is another important cultural factor. The Philippines’ nearly 50-year American colonial rule contributed to a unique acculturation experience for Filipinos and a complex and confusing ethnic and cultural identity. Our study examined the impact of acculturation and value for integrating IFS into mental health treatment on MHSB. Recruitment and dissemination of the study questionnaire were conducted via email and social media platforms (i.e., Reddit, Facebook). In the sample of 294 Filipinos across 40 states, 96.1% (n = 268) reported as belonging to a Filipino ethnic group and 8.4% (n = 22) identified with belonging to an Indigenous Filipino tribe. Our results revealed that higher acculturation and higher value of integrating IFS into mental health treatment are both associated with higher MHSB. These findings emphasize considerations for cultural factors in the psychological study and mental health treatment of Filipinos. Incorporating culturally relevant factors such as spirituality and history into healing and treatment promotes much needed access to a culturally adapted mental health support for Filipinos in the USA.
... Though no specific information on refugee children is available, several studies that examined utilization of mental health services by ethnic and linguistic minorities (Snowden & Cheung, 1990;S. Sue, Fujino, Hu, Takeuchi, & et al., 1991;Takeuchi, Sue, & Yeh, 1995;Ying & Hu, 1994) found that Hispanic and Asian groups are underserved relative to Whites. Even when refugee children and families do seek mental health care, it is not clear to what extent existing services are well suited to the values and customs of their native culture. ...
... However, these studies did not involve ethnic paraprofessionals matched on culture and language with their clients. On the other hand, Ying & Hu (1994) compared mental health service use and outcomes of four Southeast Asian groups (Vietnamese, Cambodians, Laotians and Hmong) with four other Asian American groups (Japanese, Chinese, Filipino and Korean). The Southeast Asians were more likely to be seen by paraprofessionals than members of other Asian groups. ...
... Though no specific information on refugee children is available, several studies that examined utilization of mental health services by ethnic and linguistic minorities (Snowden & Cheung, 1990;S. Sue, Fujino, Hu, Takeuchi, & et al., 1991;Takeuchi, Sue, & Yeh, 1995;Ying & Hu, 1994) found that Hispanic and Asian groups are underserved relative to Whites. Even when refugee children and families do seek mental health care, it is not clear to what extent existing services are well suited to the values and customs of their native culture. ...
... However, these studies did not involve ethnic paraprofessionals matched on culture and language with their clients. On the other hand, Ying & Hu (1994) compared mental health service use and outcomes of four Southeast Asian groups (Vietnamese, Cambodians, Laotians and Hmong) with four other Asian American groups (Japanese, Chinese, Filipino and Korean). The Southeast Asians were more likely to be seen by paraprofessionals than members of other Asian groups. ...
... Despite their large presence and long history in the United States, and the colonization of the Philippines under Spanish, American, and Japanese rule (Bonus, 2000), how Filipino cultural factors influence their mental health and well-being have been understudied (David et al., 2022). FAs have elevated rates of mental illnesses such as depression (David, 2008;Rumbaut, 1994) and psychological distress (Nicdao et al., 2015), while having lower mental health help-seeking rates (Abe- Kim et al., 2007;Gong et al., 2003;Ying & Hu, 1994), compared to other AA ethnic groups and the general U.S. population. Cultural values can be one of several factors that may play a critical role in FA mental health disparities. ...
Article
Full-text available
Cultural values influence health beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. Given the history of precolonial Philippines and under Spanish, American, and Japanese colonization, Filipinos have unique cultural values that are understudied in relation to health outcomes. The objectives of this study are to (a) create and validate measurement scales of surface level Filipino cultural values and (b) examine its associations with depressive symptoms and substance use in a sample of Filipino Americans (FAs). We analyzed data from the Midwest Longitudinal Studies of Asian American Families collected in 2013 of FA parents (n = 376). We implemented factor analyses to create and validate the scales and ordinary least squares and logistic regressions to examine the associations between Filipino cultural values and depressive symptoms and substance use. Factor analyses produced five scales: Hiya (dignity or shame) from parent, Hiya in general, Utang na Loob (gratitude or solidarity), Pakikisama (companionship), and Bahala Na (determination). Hiya from parent was positively associated with depressive symptoms, and hiya in general was negatively associated with depressive symptoms and alcohol use until passing out. The findings demonstrate the nuanced and complex means that Filipino cultural values have influenced health outcomes in FAs. This study is the first of its kind to quantitatively measure surface level Filipino cultural values. Future studies should consider using the measurement scales to better understand how intergenerational trauma and resilience through cultural values influence other health beliefs, behaviors, and outcomes in Filipinos in the Philippines and in the diaspora.
... The vast heterogeneity within the Asian American population is widely recognized (Uba, 1994), yet existing research on Asian Americans often fails to attend to issues of intragroup differences in acculturation and ethnicity. Within the Asian American population, some ethnic groups (e.g., Southeast Asian, Korean) appear to have greater mental health needs than others (e.g., Chinese, Japanese; Kuo, 1984;Uehara, Takeuchi, & Smukler, 1994;Ying & Hu, 1994). These findings have been attributed to differences in immigration history, refugee status, trauma experience, and socioeconomic and acculturative stress. ...
Article
Full-text available
Medical record abstraction was conducted at an ethnic-specific mental health outpatient clinic to identify correlates of suicidal behaviors in a sample of 285 Asian American youths. Some risk factors, such as parent–child conflict and age, which have been associated with suicidality in majority group youths, predicted suicidality in this sample, whereas other risk factors, such as gender, did not generalize to this sample. Acculturation interacted with the risk factor of parent–child conflict to predict suicidality. Less acculturated Asian youths were at proportionally greater risk for suicidality under conditions of high parent–child conflict than were their more acculturated counterparts. This finding underscores the importance of culture as a context for determining the relevance of stressors for potentiating psychopathology.
... Other articles explore the psychological damages of historical and contemporary experiences of oppression (Estrellado et al., 2021;Nadal et al., 2021), including those most recently revealed and amplified by the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic (Arañez-Litam & Oh, 2021). Some researchers attempted to better understand one of the more consistent findings in Asian American psychology-that as low as the mental health helpseeking rate is for Asian Americans, FAs seek professional psychological help at an even lower rate (Gong et al., 2003;Tanaka-Konayagi, 2001;Ying & Hu, 1994)-by investigating other factors that might influence FA mental health help-seeking (Alviar & del Prado, 2021;Tuazon & Clemente, 2021). There are also articles that explore stigmatized issues within the community, such as intimate partner violence (Chronister et al., 2021) and suicide . ...
Article
Full-text available
Although Filipina/x/o Americans (FAs) have a long and large presence in the United States, they have been historically marginalized even within the Asian American community and have been relatively understudied by the field of psychology—even by Asian American psychology. Over the past few years, however, there has been significant growth in FA psychology research, clinical practice, and community work, and this special issue highlights a sample of articles that build on this momentum. Collectively, the articles in this special issue raise questions and recommendations that touch on the rich and complicated diversity of the Filipina/x/o experiences, traditional ways of knowing and healing, indigenous cultural values, and the challenges of addressing the many negative consequences of oppression on Filipina/x/os while still remembering the resiliency and strength of the community. Nevertheless, although Filipina/x/o America Psychology has undeniably come a long way—and this special issue is an important milestone in its development—there remains plenty of work that must be done and plenty of areas wherein we can grow and do better. Thus, we also present a set of guiding principles as we “continue on” and “go ahead” with our FA Psychology work.
... When examining the broader and more heterogeneous group of Asian Americans, studies suggest that Asian Americans (including Asian Indians) have low rates of mental health service utilization and help-seeking behaviors (Hall et al., 2018;Sue et al., 2012;U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2001;Ying & Hu, 1994). For instance, in a national sample of Asian Americans in the U.S. (which includes Asian Indians), ∼9% sought any mental health-related service, ∼4% sought help from general medical providers, ∼3% sought help from mental health providers in the past 12 months; and ∼34% with a probable diagnosis sought any services (Abe-Kim et al., 2007), which is lower than compared to the ∼41% estimate of individuals in the general U.S. population seeking services (Wang et al., 2005). ...
Article
Topic. Limited research has examined trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among Asian Indians in the U.S. Thus, we (1) synthesize literature on trauma, PTSD, disparities in treatment for PTSD, the burden of untreated PTSD, and culturally-adapted (CA) PTSD interventions; and (2) discuss recommendations for clinicians/researchers working with this population. Method. We searched two databases using keywords related to Asian Indians, PTSD, and interventions. Of 238 identified articles, we used content from 26 articles to inform our review. Findings. Asian Indians report traumatic experiences before, during, or after immigration to the U.S. and consequential PTSD symptoms. Further, Asian Indians in the U.S. are disproportionately impacted by socio-cultural and economic determinants of poor mental health (e.g., shame/stigma associated with seeking mental health services, few culturally-responsive services), which may contribute to the under-reporting of PTSD and (interpersonal) traumas and less willingness to seek treatment. Additionally, CA PTSD interventions tailored to Asian Indians in the U.S. have not been developed. Socio-cultural considerations that can inform CA PTSD interventions for Asian Indians include: causal conditions (e.g., culturally-rooted beliefs about trauma/PTSD), intervening conditions/barriers (e.g., emotional inhibition), and mitigating/coping strategies (e.g., religious/spiritual practices, cultural idioms of distress). These considerations influence clinician/treatment preferences (e.g., solution-oriented and structured therapy, less emotional exposure). Lastly, we outline recommendations for clinicians/researchers: (1) need for national studies on trauma, PTSD, treatment utilization, and the burden of untreated PTSD; (2) consideration of immigration-related experiences influencing PTSD; (3) consideration of socio-cultural elements for CA PTSD interventions; and (4) need for culturally-valid PTSD assessments.
Chapter
This chapter discusses the influence of culture on the route an individual takes to access treatment for psychological distress and the treatment received. Culture is difficult to measure. All categories of cultural variables have different meanings and measure different things. Research into them leads to different hypotheses. Given this reality, there is no need to join the cul-de-sac argument of whether one or the other is the most important. In the discussion below, the roles of ethnicity and of socio-economic, political, community, national, and other factors that help to define the culture of an individual or a group are acknowledged. Associations with pathways to care, service use, and outcome will be presented.
Article
Objectives: In this paper we explore the ambulatory MHS use in three different Spanish areas (Basque Country, Madrid and Sevilla) looking for similarities and divergences between them. This analysis will give us a better understanding of our activity, allowing us to propose changes in the MHS organization to improve the attendance provided. Material and Method: This study includes 3.696 ambulatory patients attended in the MHS of Fuenlabrada and Getafe (Madrid), Basauri and Galdakao (Vizcaya, Basque Country) and Camas and Carmona (Sevilla, Andalusia) during 1.996. Data of their first MHS visit and of the use of ambulatory resources during the subsequent year were collected. The resource consumption was measure through the number of ambulatory visits and the total time spent in the assistance. Results and conclusions: The ambulatory mental health resources use is associated with sex (higher in women), age (higher in younger patients), educational level (higher in patients having primary certificate), MHS (higher in the Basque MHS and lower in the Andalusian MHS), referring service (higher when patients are referred from non-health system services) and the diagnosis (higher in patients diagnosed as having schizophrenia, mood psychosis or eating disorders. Differences between participating MHS are probably explained by unequal staff resources.
Article
Full-text available
This article examines the role of cultural knowledge and culture-specific techniques in the psychotherapeutic treatment of ethnic minority-group clients. Recommendations that admonish therapists to be culturally sensitive and to know the culture of the client have not been very helpful. Such recommendations often fail to specify treatment procedures and to consider within-group heterogeneity among ethnic clients. Similarly, specific techniques based on the presumed cultural values of a client are often applied regardless of their appropriateness to a particular ethnic client. It is suggested that cultural knowledge and culture-consistent strategies be linked to two basic processes—credibility and giving. Analysis of these processes can provide a meaningful method of viewing the role of culture in psychotherapy and also provides suggestions for improving psychotherapy practices, training, and research for ethnic-minority populations.
Article
Full-text available
Reports analyses of outcome measures obtained from patients, therapists, and clinical observers in the Penn Psychotherapy Project, a 5-yr study of factors that predict outcome in outpatient psychotherapy. The data from the "method factors" study by D. S. Cartwright et al were also reanalyzed. Results in both studies were very similar. Substantial agreement was found among viewpoints about broadly defined treatment outcomes, although distinct viewpoints did clearly exist. Contrary to a common opinion, consensus measures of psychotherapy outcome could be meaningfully defined. Relationships among posttreatment ratings of benefits from therapy and measures of adjustment obtained before and after treatment were explored. A strong relationship was found between the residual gain score and ratings of benefits, suggesting that posttreatment ratings of outcome take account of the fact that the amount of change to be expected depends on the initial level of functioning. (31 ref)
Article
Full-text available
Examined between- and within-programs variations in the amount and type of treatment obtained by 412 patients (aged 18+ yrs) who entered treatment for unipolar depression in 1 of 6 programs. Ss were assessed on the Health and Daily Living Form, the Family Environment Scale, and the Work Environment Scale. Each program had a distinctive orientation toward treatment as shown by considerable between-programs variability in Ss' treatment experiences. These between-programs differences remained significant after controlling for severity of depressive symptoms and the sociodemographic characteristics of Ss treated in each program. Within programs, there was only limited evidence for a patient–treatment matching process in which Ss with more severe depression received more intensive treatment. However, there was also little evidence of clinician bias against providing treatment to less "desirable" Ss, such as those who were older or of lower social status. Ss who experienced more recent life stressors were treated less intensively, perhaps because of a tendency to attribute their depression to situational rather than dispositional factors. (45 ref)
Article
Full-text available
This investigation attempted to evaluate the relative efficiency of four psychotherapeutic psychotherapeutic programs with three patient groups on a number of different criteria. All patients in the study lived on the same experimental ward. The four treatments were: (a) group living, in which all activities were group oriented, i.e., work, living arrangements, psychotherapy, etc., (b) group therapy and an individual work assignment, (c) individual therapy and an individual work assignment, and (d) a control group with an individual work assignment and no therapy. The three patient groups were: (a) a nonpsychotic group, (b) a short-term psychotic group, and (c) a long-term psychotic group. The design was a three by four factorial type analysis of variance with an N of eight in each cell and a total N of 96. All patients were tested and rated upon entry into the program and upon departure. The instruments were: (a) Ward Behavior, (b) MMPI, (c) TAT, (d) Holland Vocational Preference Inventory, (e) Q sort, and (f) a six-month follow-up questionnaire. In addition, all patients in group therapy were rated every 30 days on Finney's (1954) Therapy Scale and 70 of the 96 were rated on job performance, both upon entry and termination of the program. Results suggest that: 1. The number of days in treatment was significantly different for both treatment and diagnostic groups. The individual therapy group took the greatest time, group living next, with group therapy and control the least and almost equivalent times. Diagnostically, long-term psychotics were in treatment longest, with short-term psychotics and nonpsychotics requiring the least and almost equivalent times. 2. Generally, significantly different variances occurred on most instruments between treatments and diagnoses. The control group usually had the smallest variance and the three psychotherapy groups the largest. Of the four treatments, group living or individual therapy usually showed the greatest variance. 3. Tests of significance between change score medians revealed only the Ma scale of the MMPI yielding a significant difference between treatments. Further results are detailed.
Chapter
The notion of “cultural conceptions of mental health” refers to “common sense” knowledge which is used to interpret social and medical experience, and which plays an important role in shaping both professional and “everyday” views of mental disorder. A growing amount of cultural and psychiatric research is showing that illness experience is an interpretive enterprise which is constructed in social situations according to the premises of cultural “theories” about illness and social behavior generally. Despite the large number of anthropological and psychiatric studies which have offered accounts of cultural beliefs about mental disorder, these accounts have generally been secondary to more broad ethnographic and clinical objectives of research. We still know very little about the symbolic and cognitive organization of common sense understandings about mental disorder which give illness experience cultural meaning and social significance. Research on these topics is essential for progress on answering fundamental questions about the universality and culture-specificity of aspects of mental disorder, its comprehension in human knowledge systems, and its significance for individuals and social communities. This book presents a series of papers whose primary objective is to examine conceptions of mental health as culturally ordered symbolic systems, and in so doing to draw attention to their relevance for understanding and treating mental disorder across cultures.