Content uploaded by Nicola Singleton
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Nicola Singleton
Content may be subject to copyright.
Sartorial
implications
*
The
decline
in
the
sartorial
elegance
often
associated
with
the
medical
profession
particu-
larly
in
the
field
of
obstetrics
and
gynaecology,
seems
to
have
accelerated
over
the
past
genera-
tion
*
The
wearing
of
bow
ties
has
decreased
*
The
results
of
the
study
suggest
a
possible
lower
contamination
of
bow
ties
*
In
spite
of
the
results
of
this
study,
because
of
its
peculiar
image
implications,
this
exquisite
fashion
accessory
will
remain
confined
to
being
wom
by
a
small
minority
of
bow
tie
connoisseurs
fluid
and
blood,
resulting
in
greater
contamination
of
conventional
ties
than
bow
ties,
as
suggested
in
this
study.
Greater
contamination
does
not,
however,
mean
that
the
level
of
cross
infection
in
patients
attended
must
be
higher.
To
confirm
that,
a
much
larger
study
looking
at
infection
on
postnatal
wards
would
be
necessary.
A
necktie
is
the
most
useless
item
in
any
man's
wardrobe.
It
does
not
offer
any
protection
against
the
weather
or
injury;
it
is
even
rather
uncomfortable.
Yet
most
men
would
not
dream
of
going
to
work
or
to
any
special
event
without
wearing
a
tie,
using
it
as
their
sole
opportunity
to
flaunt
their
individuality,
taste,
and
style
against
the
dull
uniform
of
a
suit.9
Bow
ties
enjoyed
a
bad
press
through
the
1970s
and
1
980s
unless
wom
with
formal
evening
clothes:
American
image
consultant
John
Molloy
wamed
that
those
wearing
bow
ties
would
not
be
taken
seriously
or
be
trusted
with
anything
important.'0
It
is
therefore
not
surpris-
ing
that
most
doctors
lack
the
courage
and
motivation
to
include
a
bow
tie
in
their
wardrobe,
and
none
of
the
doctors
in
the
study
regularly
wore
bow
ties.
In
view
of
this,
and
despite
the
fact
that
all
the
doctors
interviewed
said
that
they
would
consider
wearing
bow
ties
if
they
proved
to
be
more
hygienic,
we
believe
that
this
exquisite
fashion
accessory
will
remain
confined
to
a
small
minority
of
connoisseurs.
We
thank
the
participants
from
Arrowe
Park
Hospital,
Birmingham
Maternity
Hospital,
Mill
Road
Maternity
Hospital,
the
Royal
Liverpool
University
Hospital
in
Liver-
pool,
HM
Stanley
Hospital,
and
St
Asaph
and
Whiston
District
General
Hospital
for
their
enthusiasm;
Professor
John
Newton
for
his
kind
comments;
and
Schering
Health
Care
for
their
generous
sponsorship
of
this
study.
1
Byrde
P.
The
male
image.
The
necktie.
London:
Anchor
Press,
1979:111-23.
2
De
Marly
D.
Working
dress.
A
history
of
occupational
clothing.
Bath:
Bath
Press,
1986.
3
Bettman
OL,
Hench
PS.
A
pictorial
history
of
medicine.
Springfield,
IL:
C
C
Thomas,
1976.
4
Margotta
R.
An
illustrated
history
of
medicine.
Feltham:
Hamlyn,
1967:229.
5
Sakula
A.
Portraits,
paintings
and
sculptures.
London:
Royal
Society
of
Medicine,
1988:150.
6
[Editorial].
Tailorand
Cutter
1990:
March
18:
3.
7
Godlee
R.
Lister
and
his
work.
London:
University
of
London
Press,
1927:
100-2.
8
Tooley
S.
Life
of
Florence
Nightingale.
London:
S
Bousfield,
1904:119.
9
Amies
H.
Introduction.
In:
Gibbons
S.
The
Tie.
London:
Studio
Editions,
1990:6.
10
Molloy
JT.
Dress
for
success.
New
York:
Warner
Books,
1976:76-8.
Is
Friday
the
13th
bad
for
your
health?
T
J
Scanlon,
Robert
N
Luben,
F
L
Scanlon,
Nicola
Singleton
Department
of
Public
Health,
Mid
Downs
Health
Authority,
Haywards
Heath,
West
Sussex
RH16
4BE
T
J
Scanlon,
registrar
in
public
health
Robert
N
Luben,
small
systems
analyst
F
L
Scanlon,
registrar
in
psychiatry
Nicola
Singleton,
senior
research
officer
Correspondence
to:
Dr
Scanlon.
BMJ
1993;307:
1584-6
Abstract
Objective-To
examine
the
relation
between
health,
behaviour,
and
superstition
surrounding
Friday
13th
in
the
United
Kingdom.
Design-Retrospective
study
of
paired
data
comparing
driving
and
shopping
patterns
and
accidents.
Subjects-Drivers,
shoppers,
and
residents.
Setting-South
West
Thames
region.
Main
outcome
measures-Numbers
of
vehicles
on
motorways;
numbers
of
shoppers
in
supermarkets;
and
hospital
admissions
due
to
accidents.
Results-There
were
consistently
and
signifi-
cantly
fewer
vehicles
on
the
southern
section
of
the
M25
on
Friday
the
13th
compared
with
Friday
the
6th.
The
numbers
of
shoppers
were
not
significantly
different
on
the
two
days.
Admissions
due
to
trans-
port
accidents
were
significantly
increased
on
Friday
13th
(total
65
v
45;
p
<
0
05).
Conclusions-Friday
13th
is
unlucky
for
some.
The
risk
of
hospital
admission
as
a
result
of
a
transport
accident
may
be
increased
by
as
much
as
52%.
Staying
at
home
is
recommended.
Introduction
Superstitions
affect
behaviour
in
all
cultures
in
all
parts
of
the
world
in
some
form
or
other.
Most
work,
however,
seems
to
have
focused
on
the
effects
of
supernatural
beliefs
in
developing
countries.`16
Perhaps
there
is
a
subconscious
perception
that
people
in
the
West
are
too
sophisticated
to
be
influenced
by
such
trifles.
The
purpose
of
this
study
was
to
examine
the
relation
between
health,
behaviour,
and
superstition
in
the
United
Kingdom.
To
assess
this,
we
considered
the
relation
between
accidents
and
Friday
the
13th,
which
is
popularly
perceived
to
be
an
unlucky
day.
The
origins
of
Friday
the
13th
as
an
unlucky
day
are
twofold:
Friday
and
the
number
13.
FRIDAY
Now
Friday
came,
you
old
wives
say,
Of
all
the
week's
the
unluckiest
day.
The
roots
of
Friday
as
an
unlucky
day
are
predomi-
nantly
Christian,
Good
Friday
being
the
day
on
which
Christ
was
crucified.
Superstitions
about
Friday
exist
in
various
parts
of
the
world.
Within
Britain
itself
there
are
regional
superstitions.7
In
Somerset,
whoever
tums
a
bed
on
Friday
turns
ships
at
sea.
In
Cumberland,
babies
born
on
a
Friday
were
laid
on
the
family
Bible.
In
various
regions,
to
call
a
doctor
for
the
first
time
on
a
Friday
is
held
to
be
a
certain
omen
of
death
for
the
patient.
(Unfortunately
the
GMC
is
unlikely
to
view
this
as
sufficient
good
reason
for
refusing
a
house
call.)
Hair
and
nails
should
never
be
cut
on
a
Friday.
Why
these
have
been
chosen
as
unlucky
if
occurring
on
a
Friday
is
not
clear.
Other
superstitions
around
Friday
have
more
apparent
origins.
For
example,
laundry
should
never
be
washed
on
a
Friday.
A
Yorkshire
legend
has
it
that
as
Christ
was
walking
to
Calvary
a
woman
washing
outside
her
house
derisively
waved
a
wet
garment
at
his
face,
whereupon
he
cursed
her
and
all
who
should
in
future
wash
on
that
day.
Although
generally
considered
unlucky
for
weddings,
1584
BMJ
VOLUME
307
18-25
DECEMBER
1993
Friday
is
actually
regarded
by
some
as
lucky:
in
Norse
mythology
Friday
is
sacred
to
the
Goddess
Freya
and
hence
fortunate
for
lovers.
THE
NUMBER
13
The
origins
of
many
of
the
superstitions
around
the
number
13
are
Christian
too,
mainly
pertaining
to
the
last
supper
when
Christ
dined
with
his
12
apostles.
Even
before
this,
the
Romans
disliked
the
number
13
as
much
as
we
do,
regarding
it
as
a
symbol
of
death,
destruction,
and
misfortune.8
Thirteen
is
widely
considered
an
unlucky
number.
Houses
are
often
not
given
the
number
13,
nor
are
many
apartment
blocks.
With
an
eye
on
the
market,
many
hotels
do
not
have
a
13th
floor;
the
Carlton
Hotel
in
London
may
have
18
floors,
but
the
13th
is
missing.
It
is
very
unlucky
for
13
people
to
sit
down
and
dine
together.
The
first
to
rise,
like
the
ill
fated
apostle,
will
meet
serious
misfortune
within
the
year.
Few
people
are
married
on
the
13th,
and
Friday
the
13th,
particu-
larly
if
it
falls
in
May,
is
regarded
with
extreme
foreboding.
Methods
Gathering
examples
of
superstition
is
relatively
easy,
but
the
level
and
effects
of
such
superstitions
on
behaviour
are
rather
more
difficult
to
quantify.
As
La
Pierre
showed
in
the
1930s,
what
people
say
and
what
they
do
are
often
very
different.9
To
avoid
this
bias
and
to
minimise
costs
we
used
routinely
collected
data
from
not
so
routine
sources
to
address
the
following
questions:
just
how
superstitious
are
people
and
how
TABLE
i-Trafficflows
on
southern
section
of
M25
Difference
Friday
6th
Friday
13th
(6th-i
3th)
July
1990
Junction
7
to
8
139
246
138
548
698
Junction
9
to
IO
134
012
132
908
1104
September
1991
Junction
7
to
8
137
055
136
018
1037
Junction
9
to
I0
133
732
131
843
1889
December
1991
Junction
7
to
8
123
552
121
641
1911
Junction9tolO
121139
118723
2416
March
1992
Junction
7
to
8
128
293
125
532
2761
Junction
9
to
10
124
631
120
249
4382
November
1992
Junction
7
to
8
124
609
122
770
1839
Junction
9
to
10
117
584
117
263
321
TABLE
ui-Number
of
shoppers
in
nine
Sainsburys
supermarkets
in
south
east
England
1990
1991
1992
July
September
December
March
November
Total
(mean)
Epsom:
6th
4942 4895
4805
4570
4506
23
718
(4744)
13th
4882
4736
4784
4603
4629
23
634
(4727)
Guildford:
6th
6754 6704
5871
6026
5676
31
031
(6206)
13th
6998
6707 5662
6162
5665
31
194
(6239)
Dorking:
6th
3685
3799
3563
3673 3558
18
278
(3656)
13th
3848 3680
3554
3676
3613
18
371
(3674)
Chichester:
6th
5751
5367
4949
5298
5199
26
564
(5313)
13th
5993
5320
4960
5467
5092
26
832
(5366)
Horsham:
6th
4141
3674
3707
3633
3688
18
843
(3769)
13th
4389
3660 3822
3730
3615
19
216
(3843)
East
Grinstead:
6th
4266
3954
4028
3689
3920
19
857
(3971)
13th
4532
3964
3926
3692 3853
19
967
(3993)
Lewisham:
6th
7138
6568 6514
6115
5325
31
660(6332)
13th
6836 6363
6555
6412
6099
32
265
(6453)
Nine
Elms:
6th
6502
6416
6422
6748
7023
331
1(6622)
13th
6648 6398 6503
6716
7057
33
322
(6664)
Crystal
Palace:
6th
4083
4107
4168
4174
4079
20
611
(4122)
13th
4277
4334
4050 4198
4105
20
964
(4193)
does
this
affect
their
behaviour?
And
is
Friday
the
13th
a
more
unlucky
day?
We
can
turn
the
first
question
around
and
make
reasonable
inferences
as
to
just
how
superstitious
people
are
by
examining
their
behaviour-for
example,
are
people
less
likely
to
drive
and
shop
on
Friday
the
13th?
We
looked
at
information
from
the
Department
of
Transport
on
traffic
flows-specifi-
cally,
for
the
southern
section
of
the
M25,
between
junctions
7
and
8
and
junctions
9
and
10-and
from
the
market
research
department
of
J
Sainsbury
plc
on
the
numbers
of
shoppers
in
nine
different
supermarkets
in
south
east
England.
To
address
the
second
question
we
looked
at
the
number
of
admissions
for
accidents
and
poisoning
in
South
West
Thames
region
and
at
what
we
agreed
were
the
particularly
unlucky
accidents
that
could
occur.
The
population
studied
broadly
corresponded
to
the
residents
of
South
West
Thames
Regional
Health
Authority
(south
London,
Surrey,
and
West
Sussex).
The
1991
census
gave
this
population
as
3
230
100.
Because
a
normal
distribution
could
not
be
assumed
for
any
of
the
data,
non-parametric
methods
were
used
in
data
analysis.
Results
DRIVING
Figures
on
traffic
flows
are
available
for
the
past
three
years
(table
I).
Analysis
did
not
include
April
1990,
the
13th
of
which
was
Good
Friday.
There
were
consistently
and
significantly
fewer
motorists
on
the
road
on
Friday
the
13th
than
on
Friday
the
6th
(p
<
0
01,
Wilcoxon
signed
rank
test).
Examination
of
the
weather
patterns
for
the
south
east
did
not
show
different
weather
patterns
for
the
two
Fridays.
(The
weather
does
not
seem
to
be
any
more
unlucky.)
Examination
of
the
percentage
fewer
vehicles
on
the
road
may
reveal
the
numbers
of
people
less
likely
to
drive
on
Friday
the
13th,
which
may
be
due
to
superstition.
There
were
1-4%
fewer
vehicles
on
the
southern
section
of
the
M25
on
Friday
the
13th-even
if
each
vehicle
had
only
one
occupant
this
could
mean
at
least
1-4%
of
the
population
are
sufficiently
super-
stitious
to
alter
their
behaviour
and
refrain
from
driving
on
motorways
on
Friday
the
13th.
SHOPPING
If
fewer
people
are
driving
on
motorways,
what
are
they
doing
instead?
To
examine
whether
they
were
remaining
at
home
we
looked
at
figures
for
shopping
at
nine
supermarkets.
Table
II
compares
Friday
the
13th
with
Friday
the
6th
for
the
five
typical
Friday
13ths
over
the
past
three
years.
In
all
supermarkets
but
one
there
were
on
average
more
shoppers
on
Friday
the
13th
than
on
Friday
6th
(total
average
difference
0.93%;
p<
005).
EMERGENCY
ADMISSIONS
Data
on
emergency
admissions
due
to
accidents
and
poisoning
(main
diagnosis)
were
available
for
the
nine
Friday
the
13ths
over
the
past
five
years.
As
coding
for
May
1988
and
January
1989
was
incomplete,
these
figures
are
not
included
(only
one
accident
was
recorded
during
these
four
days),
nor
were
those
for
Good
Friday
when
it
fell
on
the
13th.
As
can
be
seen
from
table
III,
emergency
admissions
with
the
main
diagnosis
of
accident
or
poisoning
were
higher
on
Friday
the
13th
(mean
6)
than
on
Friday
the
6th
(mean
5).
The
numbers
are
small
and
the
differ-
ence
is
not
statistically
significant.
Therefore
we
looked
at
all
admissions
of
South
West
Thames
residents
with
a
subsidiary
diagnosis
in
specific
accident
categories:
accidental
falls
(ICD
E880.0-
E888.9);
injuries
caused
by
venomous
animals
and
BMJ
VOLUME
307
18-25
DECEMBER
1993
1
585
plants
and
other
animals
(E905.0-E906.9);
injuries
undetermined
whether
accidently
or
purposely
inflicted
(E980.0-E989.9);
accidental
poisoning
by
drugs,
biological
agents,
other
solids,
gases,
or
vapours
(E850.0-E869.9);
and
transport
accidents
(E800.0-
E848.9).
Table
IV
shows
these
data
for
the
six
Fridays
TABLE
in-Numbers
of
emergency
admissions
for
accidents
(including
fractures)
and
poisoning,
South
West
Thames
region
Friday
6th
Friday
13th
1989:
October
4
7
1990:
July
6
6
1991:
September
1
5
December
9
5
1992:
March
9 7
November
1
6
Total
(mean)
30
(5)
36
(6)
TABLE
Iv-Numbers
of
admissions
of
South
West
Thames
residents
by
type
of
accident
Friday
6th
(n
-
6)
Friday 13th
(n
-
6)
Cause
of
accident
Total
Mean
Total
Mean
Falling
370
61-7
343
57-2
Animals
1
0-1
3 0-5
Undetermined
1
0-1
4
0
7
Poisoning
37
6-2
33
5-5
Transport
45
7-5
65
10-8
TABLE
v-Numbers
of
admissions
due
to
transport
accidents,
South
West
Thames
region
Friday
6th
Friday
13th
1989:
October
9
13
1990:
July
6
12
1991:
September
11
14
December
11
10
1992:
March
3
4
November
5
12
Total
45
65
used
since
October
1989.
The
only
accident
group
that
showed
a
statistically
significant
result
was
transport
accidents,
which
we
analysed
further
(table
V).
On
five
of
the
six
Friday
the
13ths
there
were
more
accidents
than
on
the
Friday
the
6ths
(p
<
0
05).
Discussion
Although
the
data
are
few
and
the
statistical
analysis
simple,
some
tentative
conclusions
can
be
drawn.
DRIVING
Fewer
people
seem
prepared
to
drive
on
motorways
on
Friday
the
13th.
About
1
4%
of
the
population
may
be
so
affected.
Analysis
of
data
comparing,
for
example,
Friday
the
5th
with
Friday
the
12th
would
rule
out
other
unrecognised
reasons
for
weekly
changes
in
driving
pattems.
SHOPPING
The
data
on
supermarket
shopping
suggest
that
contrary
to
driving
on
motorways,
people
are
not
deterred
from
shopping
on
Friday
the
13th.
Local
expeditions
for
shopping,
which
may
be
on
foot,
by
public
transport,
or
by
car,
are
not
postponed.
Shopping
patterns
may
reflect
salary
patterns:
people
paid
at
the
end
of
the
month
may
shop
then
and
two
weeks
rather
than
one
week
later,
when
food
supplies
have
run
a
bit
low.
It
would
be
interesting
to
know
the
mode
of
trans-
port
to
these
stores.
Only
one
of
the
nine
stores
examined,
Chichester,
was
"out
of
town,"
the
others
being
relatively
easy
to
reach
on
foot
or
by
public
transport.
The
results
for
Chichester
were
not
signifi-
cantly
different
from
the
rest
(p
>
0
05).
EMERGENCY
ADMISSIONS
Although
the
numbers
of
admissions
from
accidents
are
too
small
to
allow
meaningful
analysis,
there
seem
to
be
more
injuries
from
transport
accidents
on
Friday
the
13th-despite
there
being
fewer
vehicles
on
the
road.
But
there
are
several
caveats
in
any
calculation
from
our
data
of
a
risk
ratio
for
suffering
a
transport
accident
on
Friday
the
13th:
such
accidents
could
involve
any
form
of
transport,
though
motor
vehicles
comprise
the
vast
majority;
the
accidents
we
recorded
happened
anywhere
in
Britain
to
residents
of
South
West
Thames
region;
the
information
on
traffic
flows
refers
specifically
to
numbers
of
vehicles
on
the
southern
section
of
the
M25.
That
said,
our
data
yield
a
risk ratio
of
1
52-that
is,
the
risk
of
a
transport
accident
on
Friday
the
13th
may
be
increased
by
52%.
CONCLUSIONS
There
are
four
possible
reasons
for
the
findings:
(i)
chance:
further
work
on
larger
samples
would
confirm
or
refute
our
evidence;
(ii)
confounding:
some
hitherto
unrecognised
factor
may
be
related
to
both
driving
patterns
and
accident
rates;
(iii)
bias:
that
those
recording
accident
data
may
be
more
likely
to
record
accidents
on
Friday
the
13th;
(iv)
association:
Friday
the
13th
is
a
more
unlucky
day.
Other
than
the
people
who
stay
off
motorways,
there
may
be
people
who
are
superstitious,
but
not
enough
to
refrain
from
motorway
driving.
Do
drivers
on
A,
B,
C,
and
D
roads
alter
their
behaviour,
and
in
what
way?
Is
the
alteration-for
example
more
wariness-a
positive
change
making
them
more
careful
and
thus
reducing
the
chance
of
an
accident?
If
so,
Friday
the
13th
may
indeed
be
a
very
unlucky
day.
If
the
change
in
behaviour
reveals
itself
by
increased
fear
and
anxiety,
or
perhaps
a
sense
of
destiny,
it
may
reduce
concentra-
tion
and
increase
the
likelihood
of
an
accident.
Are
people's
perceptions
and
beliefs
self
fulfilling-if
you
believe
something
strongly
enough
will
it
in
fact
happen
to
you?
While
we
await
the
answers
to
these
difficult
questions
we
may
just
have
to
accept
that
Friday
the
13th
is
indeed
unlucky
for
some
and
it
might
be
safer
to
stay
at
home.
Our
thanks
go
to
Dr
Janet
Peacock
of
St
George's
Medical
School
for
her
comments
and
guidance
with
the
statistics;
R
J
Beagley,
group
research
manager
of
J
Sainsbury
plc;
and
Alastair
Greenstreet,
South
East
Construction
Programme
division,
Department
of
Transport.
1
Gouteux
JP.
The
supernatural,
health
and
community
action
in
Black
Africa.
Bulletin
de
la
Societi
de
Pathologie
Exotique.
1992;85:256-60.
2
Ohaeri
JU.
Experience
of
isolated
sleep
paralysis
in
clinical
practice
in Nigeria.
JNatlMedAssoc
1992;84:521-3.
3
Aderinokun
GA,
Oyejide
CO.
Afnican
Dental3'ournal
1991;5:26-30.
4
Burleigh
E,
Dardano
C,
Cruz
JR
Colors,
humors
and
evil
eye:
indigenous
classification
and
treatnent
of
childhood
diarrhoea
in
highland
Guatemala.
MedAnthropol
1990;12:419-41.
5
Mahdihassan
S.
Chinese
charms
in
the
light
of
cosmogony.
Am
J
Chin
Med
1990;18:87-94.
6
Leygues
M,
Gouteux
JP.
A
community
battle
against
a
tropical
endemic
disease:
supematural
beliefs
and
tsetse
fly
traps
in
the
Congo.
Soc
Sci
Med
1989;28:1255-67.
7
Radford
A,
Radford
MA.
The
enmclopedia
of
superstitions.
London:
Hutchin-
son,
1961.
8
Lorie
P.
Superstitions.
New
York:
Simon
and
Schuster,
1992.
9
La
Pierre
RT.
Attitudes
versus
actions.
Social
Forces
1934;13:230-7.
1586
BMJ
VOLUME
307
18-25
DECEMBER
1993