The Journal of Neuroscience, September 1993, 73(g): 4029-4041
Dorsal Root Ganglia
Genes Are Expressed in Distinct Patterns in
Departments of ‘Neurology and Neurological Surgery (Neurology), and 2Pathology and Internal Medicine, Washington
University Medical School, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Mu,lva lnmaculada Silos-Santiago, i,a Steven L. Carroll,2 and William D. Snider’
All members of the neurotrophin family of neuronal growth
factors promote survival and neurite
ganglion (DRG) neurons in vitro. The
cogenes encodes receptors that are now thought
the biological effects of neurotrophins.
about the dependence of DRG neurons
vim, we have studied mRNA
trk family in developing DRGs
rats. We show here that neurotrophin
pressed in thoracic and lumbar
(E13), which is only 24-48 hr after
these ganglia. Distinct patterns
and trkC are readily apparent
thoracic DRG neurons express
trkC are expressed by only
thoracic DRG neurons. These
tween El 5 and postnatal day 1. Although
of DRG neurons expressing
greater in lumbar than in thoracic
neurons expressing different
similar in the two regions.
The different trks are expressed
of DRG neurons from El5 onward.
dominantly by small neurons with darkly
t&8 and t&C are expressed
rons. Size-frequency histograms
pressed by neurons of variable
neurons at the smallest end
trkC is expressed predominantly
cluding those with the largest
by DRG neurons of intermediate
Our results show that a majority
mRNA for at least one member
family. Furthermore, trk expression
consistent with the idea that trks mediate
neurons to neurotrophins that
periphery and spinal cord at early
Finally, different populations
In order to learn more
DRGs by embryonic
by El5 At this age,
trkA. In contrast,
8% and 8%, respectively,
ganglia, the ratios
members of the trk family
expression of the
of the spectrum.
of DRG neurons
is expressed pre-
t&B is expressed
by large, neu-
is ex- that
in a time
of DRG neurons
in both the
Received Jan. 8, 1993; revised Mar. 22, 1993; accepted Apr. 7, 1993.
We thank Dr. L Parada for the generous gift of trkA, V. Nguyen for technical
assistance, and E. M. Johnson Jr. for comments on the manuscript. This work
was supported by NS31768 to W.D.S., Program Project NS17763, and a pilot
grant from Amgen.
Correspondence should be addressed to William D. Snider, M.D., Department
of Neurology, Box 8 1 I 1, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South
Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.
F,hould be considered co-first author.
Copyright 0 1993 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/93/134029-13$05.00/O
sal root ganglion
trks. We hypothesize
of a particular
of DRG neurons
express and trk ex-
trkA, trk6, trkC, dor-
A fundamental advance in the understanding of how growth
factors act in the developing nervous system has occurred with
the identification of receptors that mediate the biological actions
of the neurotrophin family of neuronal growth factors (Klein et
al., 1989, 1990, 199 1; Martin-Zanca et al., 1990; Lamballe et
al., 1991; for a review, see Bothwell, 1991). The identification
of these receptors is the first step in understanding how the
actions of NGF and other neurotrophins are mediated, and
provides a way of tentatively identifying cells that may respond
to particular neurotrophins in the nervous system. In vitro, the
protein product of the protooncogene trkA binds NGF with
high affinity and exhibits tyrosine kinase activity after NGF
binding (Kaplan et al., 1991a,b). Similarly, trkB binds and is
activated by brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and
trkC binds and is activated by neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) (Lamballe
et al., 199 1; Soppet et al., 199 1; Squint0 et al., 199 1). A recent
NGF deprivation experiment has demonstrated that dorsal root
ganglion (DRG) cells expressing trkA require NGF for survival,
and that DRG neurons expressing trkB and trkC are NGF in-
dependent. This result shows that the patterns of neurotrophin
binding to trks observed in vitro have physiological significance
(Carroll et al., 1992). Although some degree of cross-reactivity
has been demonstrated in vitro (Berkemeier et al., 199 1; Cordon-
Cardo et al., 199 1; Lamballe et al., 1991; Soppet et al., 199 I),
whether neurotrophins can activate multiple trks in vivo is not
settled (see Ip et al., 1993). Recent surveys have demonstrated
that trkB and trkC are widely expressed in both PNS and CNS
during development and in maturity (Emfors et al., 1992; Merlio
et al., 1992). These studies suggest that neurotrophins have
important and widespread roles in regulating neural develop-
ment and in maintaining functions of neurons in adulthood.
The DRG is an ideal system in which to delineate the func-
tions of the different neurotrophin receptors. In vitro, all neu-
rotrophins promote neurite outgrowth from DRG explants and
dissociated cultures (Lindsay et al., 1985; Davies et al., 1986;
Leibrock et al., 1989; Hohn et al., 1990; Maisonpierre et al.,
1990; Berkemeier et al., 199 1). In addition, recent studies (Mar-
tin-Zanca et al., 1990; Carroll et al., 1992; Emfors et al., 1992;
Merlio et al., 1992; Schecterson and Bothwell, 1992; Verge et
al., 1992) show that neurotrophin receptors are expressed in
DRGs in vivo. Furthermore, the biological functions of NGF
4030 Mu et al. - Expression of frks in Developing DRGs
during development in preventing naturally occurring cell death
and in the regulation of the synthesis of transmitter enzymes
have been well described in DRGs (Kessler and Black, 1980;
Otten et al., 1980; Hamburger et al., 198 1; Johnson et al., 1986).
The extent to which newer neurotrophins, acting through their
appropriate receptors, may mediate actions that are similar to
or different from those of NGF is unknown.
DRG neurons are an extremely heterogeneous population,
consisting of at least 20 functional classes in mammals based
on characteristic physiological responses, innervation of char-
acteristic receptors in peripheral tissues, and characteristic pat-
terns of arborization in the spinal cord (for reviews, see Brown,
198 1; Willis and Coggeshall, 199 1; Perl, 1992). It is highly likely
that different neurotrophins have differing effects on these dif-
ferent populations of DRG neurons. In previous work, we have
shown that administration of a specific anti-NGF antibody in
utero lesions populations of DRG neurons that project to the
superficial dorsal horn and express trkA (Carroll et al., 1992;
to more ventral spinal layers are NGF independent. The NGF
independence of the trkB- and trkC-expressing neurons in the
DRG suggests that they may be supported by other neurotro-
phins, such as BDNF, NT-3, or NT-415.
Neurotrophins are expressed in the peripheral and central
target fields of DRG neurons during
of expression of NGF, BDNF, and NT-3 both in the periphery
and the spinal cord have recently been described (Emfors and
Persson, 199 1; Schecterson and Bothwell,
et al., 1987). Interestingly, these factors are present in different
locations in the periphery. For example, NGF is expressed in
superficial epidermis, BDNF in deeper layers of developing der-
mis, and NT-3 in muscle. Of particular interest is that NT-3 is
also expressed in the ventral horn
findings raise the possibility that DRG
different locations may have different neurotrophin responsive-
ness. Expression of neurotrophins in DRG target fields is present
early in neural development. Expression of NT-3 in spinal cord
is first seen on embryonic day 13 (E13) in rat (Emfors and
Persson, 199 l), and expression of neurotrophins in spinal cord,
skin, and muscle is well established by El 1.5 in mouse (Schec-
terson and Bothwell, 1992). Thus,
in DRG target fields soon after neurogenesis begins in the gan-
Two issues are fundamental to delineating the functions of
the newly described members of the neurotrophin family in
regulating DRG development. The first is whether neurotrophin
receptors appear during development in an appropriate time
frame to allow DRG neurons to respond to neurotrophins being
synthesized in DRG cell target fields. The second is whether
different DRG neuron classes express different neurotrophin
receptors. In order to address these issues, we have studied the
expression of neurotrophin receptor genes in rat DRGs during
embryonic and postnatal development.
et al., 1992). trkB- and trkC-expressing cells that project
nuclei are well established (Smith,
1992, for a review). By PN21 animals
mother, and therefore
In order to harvest embryos, females were anesthetized
priate stage of pregnancy with a cocktail of ketamine HCl (Vetalar; 100
mg/ml), xylazine (Rompum; 20 mgml),
(PromAce; 10 mg/ml) in a 3:3:1 mixture
taken by cesarean section. El 3 embryos were fixed by immersion
fixative solution of 4% paraformaldehyde
7.2). El 3 embryos were then processed intact for paraffin histology.
Embryos at El 5 and postnatal animals were perfused through the left
ventricle with 4% paraformaldehyde
ing perfusion, animals were postfixed in ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde
overnight. Because ofthe possibility of significant differences in patterns
of expression of neurotrophin receptors, thoracic and lumbar ganglia
were studied seuaratelv in animals older than E 13. Thoracic (T4-T9)
and lumbar (L2-L5) DRGs and spinal cords were removed
and older animals and processed for paraffin embedding. Sections were
cut at 5 Frn thickness and prepared for in situ hybridization.
hybridization was performed with 35S-labeled sense and antisense ri-
boprobes. At least three experiments
1983; Snider et al., 1992; see Scott,
sensory systems are considered
to be relatively
at an appro-
racic and lumbar regions.
receptor probe at each developmental stage in both the tho-
in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH
in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. Follow-
were performed with each neu-
development. The patterns
1992; see also Davies
of the spinal
neurotrophins are expressed
studied at E 13 and El 5. Postnatal
day 1 (PN 1) and PN2 1. E 13 was chosen because neurogenesis is still
occurring at this age (Lawson et al., 1974; Altman
Animals were studied at El 5 because naturally
ongoing at this age in DRGs and El5 is prior to the time central con-
nections are established (Jacobson,
patterns of connectivity in the periphery, spinal cord, and dorsal column
were performed on Sprague-Dawley
animals were studied on postnatal
rats. Embryos were
and Bayer, 1984).
occurring cell death is
199 1; Snider et al., 1992). At PN 1,
(1) trkA. pDM97
a 464 base pair (bp) insert encoding a portion of the extracellular domain
of mouse trkA. In order to synthesize a ?S-labeled
probe, pDM97 was linearized with Sac1 and in vitro transcription
T7 RNA polymerase was carried out in the presence of ?S-labeled UTP
(New England Nuclear). A sense cRNA probe was transcribed with SP6
polymerase after linearization with XbaI. After treatment
(10 U), probes were extracted with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl
(25:24:1), and then precipitated in cold ethanol with glycogen (Boeh-
ringer Mannheim) as a carrier.
(2) trkB. A 0.5 kilobase EcoRI-HincII
which encodes a portion of the extracellular domain of mouse trkB, was
inserted into the pGEM-3Zf(+) vector (Promega) to generate pMU- 1.
After linearization with EcoRI, an antisense cRNA
scribed with SP6 RNA polymerase
A sense cRNA probe was transcribed
(3) trkC. A 577 bp PCR-generated
domain of rat trkC was cloned into the EcoRV site of DBS-KS(+)
(Stratagene), to generate JDM836.
antisense cRNA probe was transcribed
uresence of ?S-labeled UTP. A sense cRNA probe was transcribed with
‘I.7 RNA polymerase after linearization
of cRNA probes
(a gift from Dr. Luis Parada) is pGEM-7Zf(+) with
fragment of pFRK16 (ATCC),
probe was tran-
in the presence of ‘S-labeled
with T7 polymerase.
fragment encoding the extracellular
with T3 RNA polymerase in the
with NotI, ‘an
In situ hybridization
were used in all experiments.
modified from two published
al., 199 1). Slides were deparaffinized
(loo-30%) ethanol solutions.
(10 pg/ml) for 30 min at 37°C and then immersed
buffer containing 0.5% acetic anhydrate.
ethanol solutions, sections were hybridized
and antisense cRNA probes in hybridization
formamide, 2 x saline-sodium
Denhardt’s. 1 mM EDTA.
100 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 10 U of RNasin: Hybridization
carried out at 55°C for 18 hr in a humidified
ization, sections were washed in 2x SSC containing
room temperature for 20 min followed
in the same solution. After a 5 min wash in 0.5 x SSC (containing
mM DTT) at room temperature,
containing 10 mM DTT at 65°C for 20 min. Sections were then treated
with 20 itim RNase A in 0.5 M NaCl,
EDTA at37”C for 30 min followed
solution without RNase A. After a 15 min wash in 2 x SSC. sections
were then incubated in 0.1 x SSC at 65°C for 30 min followeh by a 20
min wash in 0.1 x SSC at room temperature.
hydrated through graded ethanols (30-100%) and air dried.
paraffin sections of spinal cords with attached DRGs
The in situ hybridization
protocols (Wanaka et al., 1990; Yeh et
in xylene and rehydrated in graded
Sections were treated with proteinase K
with the appropriate
citrate (SSC), 20 mM Tris (pH 8.0) 1 x
10% dextran SO,. 500 up/ml veast tRNA.
chamber. After hybrid-
10 mM DTT at
20 min wash by an additional
sections were incubated in 0.1 x SSC
10 mM Tris (PH 8.0) 1 mM
by a 30 min wash in the same
Sections were then de-
The Journal of Neuroscience, September 1993, 13(g) 4031
spinal cord at E13. Solid arrows denote DRGs, and the borders of the spinal cord are indicated by open arrows in A-E. Scale bars: A-C, 50 pm;
D and E, 100 pm.
Expression of neurotrophin
at E13. trkA, trkB, and trkC mRNA
receptor genes in rat DRGs at E13. A-C, Dark-field
can be readily detected in DRGs (so/id arrows) even at this early stage. D, Dark-field
with a trkB sense mRNA probe. E, Bright-field photomicrograph
photomicrographs of trkA, trkB, and trkC expression,
showing the cytoarchitecture of DRGs and
Slides were exposed to x-ray film (Kodak) for l-2 d. Signal strength on
the x-ray film determined the time of exposure to emulsion. Slides were
dipped in Kodak NTB-2 emulsion, which was diluted 1: 1 with distilled
water and equilibrated at 42°C. After air drying, the slides were exposed
in a desiccator at 4°C for 7-15 d. The slides were then developed
Kodak D 19 at 15°C for 5 min. After counterstaining
and eosin (Sigma), the slides were mounted
(Diagnostic with Krystalon
Morphometry of irk-expressing neurons in DRG
To determine the number
different trk neurotrophin receptors, cell profiles were viewed and drawn
with the aid of a camera lucida at 625 x . Only neurons with a nucleus
visible in the section were counted and drawn. Glial cells had small,
dark-staining nuclei and could be unambiguously
hematoxylin and eosin counterstain.
the expression of a neurotrophin receptor mRNA
silver grains were detected over the neuronal
chosen because hybridization with sense probes invariably
less than five silver grains per cell profile. Percentages of DRG neurons
expressing the different neurotrophin
For determination of cellular cross-sectional
neurons were traced on a digitizing tablet (Summagraphics)
with computer software designed to calculate areas (BIOQUANT, R&M
Biomedics). For each neurotrophin receptor gene at each developmental
of sensory neurons per section expressing
identified with the
Cells were considered positive for
when more than 10
soma. This number was
receptors were computed from
areas, profiles of DRG
lumbar ganglia for all DRG neurons, for neurons expressing the partic-
ular trk being studied, and for neurons not expressing that trk. Cross-
sectional areas of DRG neurons in all of these groups were compared
using an unpaired Student’s t test.
histograms were constructed in both thoracic and
Temporal sequence of neurotrophin receptor expression in
We first examined the expression of mRNAs encoding different
members of the trk family at various developmental stages in
rat thoracic and lumbar DRGs. All three trks were clearly ex-
pressed in thoracic DRGs by E 13, which is approximately 24-
48 hr after DRG neurogenesis begins in this region (Altman and
Bayer, 1984). Examples of trkA, trkB, and trkC expression in
DRGs at El 3 are shown in Figure IA-C (solid arrows). Ex-
amination of ganglia under bright field at high power revealed
that only a subset of DRG neurons expressed each trk even at
this early stage (see below). By E15, trks were expressed with
differing and characteristic patterns within DRGs and spinal
cord. trkA appeared to be diffusely expressed in DRGs (Fig. 2A,
thick arrows). Expression appeared diffuse because clusters of
small DRG neurons express trkA (see below). There was no
The Journal of Neuroscience, September 1993, 13(9) 4033
Table 1. Percentages of DRG cells expressing different
Th L L
Th, thoracic ganglia; L, lumbar ganglia. Note that there is little change between
E 15 and PNI. Also note that there is virtually no difference between thoracic and
lumbar DRGs in these percentages. Values were based on examination of at least
500 cells for each time point and each probe.
trkA expression in the spinal cord (not shown). The localization
of trkB mRNA was entirely different. trkB was expressed by a
small subpopulation of neurons in DRGs (Fig. 2B, arrows), and
was expressed diffusely in the spinal cord (not shown). trkC
message, like trkB, was expressed intensely by a minority of
DRG neurons (Fig. 2C, arrows). trkC message was also abun-
dant in the adjacent spinal cord (not shown).
The patterns of expression of neurotrophin receptors in DRGs
during development are shown in Figure 2. Figure 2A-C shows
the expression of trkA, trkB, and trkC, respectively, in DRGs
at E 15. In Figure 2A, the borders of the DRG are indicated by
the thick arrows. The long arrows indicate regions where trkA
is not expressed, demonstrating that not all DRG neurons ex-
press mRNA for this receptor. trkB- and trkC-expressing neu-
rons aie indicated by arrows in Figure 2, B and C. Expression
of the three trks is shown at PNl in Figure 2&F.
Figure 20, long arrows denote regions ofthe DRG where mRNA
for trkA is not expressed. Arrows in Figure 2, E and F, indicate
neurons expressing trkB and trkC, respectively. Expression of
trks at PN21 is shown in Figure 2G-I. Arrows denote trk-ex-
pressing neurons in all three panels. Asterisks denote regions of
the ganglion occupied by fascicles of myelinated and unmyelin-
ated axons that are prominent by this age. Individual neurons
expressing trkA (Fig. 2G, arrows) can be resolved at this age
because of the increase in neuronal size that has occurred be-
tween PNl and PN21.
It is apparent that the overall pattern of expression of the
different trks in DRGs changes little during the developmental
period analyzed here. Thus, at all stages, trkA message is widely
distributed in DRGs whereas trkB and trkC are expressed by a
minority of neurons. There is no trkA expression in spinal cord
even as late as PN2 1. In contrast, at each of these developmental
stages, trkB and trkC are abundantly expressed in spinal cord.
Table 1 shows the percentage of DRG neurons expressing the
three trks at El 5 and PNl. Of note is that 40% of neurons
in thoracic DRGs and 32% in lumbar DRGs at
of DRG neurons expressing dlflerent
showing the positions of DRG neurons expressing each member of the
trk family. The left column shows ganglia from animals at El 5, and the
right column shows ganglia from animals at PN 1. The positions of DRG
neurons expressing a particular trk are denoted by solidprofiles, whereas
the positions of nonexpressing neurons are denoted by the open profiles.
In general, the different trks were not found in specific locations within
the ganglia even at early developmental
for neurons expressing trkA to cluster in small groups, but these groups
were evenly distributed throughout the ganglia. trkB- and trkc-express-
ing neurons showed a slight tendency to localize to peripheral
of the ganglia. Scale bars, 100 pm.
Camera lucida tracings of representative sections of DRG
stages. There was a tendency
E 15. In contrast, only 8% and 9% of DRG neurons in thoracic
and lumbar ganglia, respectively, express trkC, and only 6% and
8% of DRG neurons express trkB. The percentage of neurons
expressing the different trks changed little between El5 and
PNl. At PNl, in both thoracic and lumbar DRGs, 46% of
(A-C), PNl (&F), and PN21 (G-Z). Left column, trkA, middle column, trkB; right column, trkC. In A (E15) and D (PNl), the DRG is denoted
by thick arrows. Expression of trkA appears diffuse at this magnification
which are clustered. Long arrows denote regions of the ganglion containing
cells can be resolved and are denoted by urrow.s. As early as E 15 (B), the pattern of trkB expression looks quite different from that of trkA. trkB
is intensely expressed a small minority of DRG cells (arrows). The pattern of trkB expression is similar at PN 1 (Z?) and PN2 1 (H). Expression of
trkC at El 5 (C), PNl (F), and PN21 (I) is similar to the pattern for trkB except that trkC is expressed by a slightly higher percentage of cells. In
G-I the asterisks indicate regions of the ganglion occupied by axons. A, C, F, and Hare
Scale bars: A-C, 50 pm; &I, 100 pm.
Higher-power dark-field views of neurotrophin receptor gene expression in DRGs during embryonic and postnatal development: El 5
because trkA is expressed by small cells within the ganglion, many of
cells that do not express trkA. By PN2 1 (G), individual trkA-expressing
thoracic DRGs, and B, D, E, G, and I are lumbar DRGs.
4034 Mu et al.
l Expression of W/S in Developing DRGs
column, trkA, right column, trkC. In A and C, representative
are marked by asterisks over their nuclei. In B and D, typical trkC-expressing
asterisks. By El 3, expression of trkA and trkC is already restricted to subsets of DRG neurons. By E15, it is readily apparent that trkA is expressed
by small DRG neurons whereas trkC is expressed by large DRG neurons (compare C and D). Scale bars, 6.5 pm.
High-power bright-field photomicrographs of neurotrophin
receptor gene expression by DRG cells at El3 (A, B) and El 5 (C, D). Left
neurons are indicated by arrows. Representative
neurons are marked by arrows, and trkC-negative
Table 2. Soma areas of DRG neurons expressing different trks
58 + 0.9
50 f 1.0*
64 XL 1.2
56 k 0.1
43 + 0.9*
62 f 0.9
119 + 1.9
98 TL 2.1$
136 ? 2.6
226 rf: 4.2
192 + 4.6$
257 k 6.1
469 + 7.1
420 + lO$
487 t 8.8
529 Z!I 9.3
454 + 12$
561 + 12
56 IL 0.6
66 + 2.5*
56 f 0.7
60 k 0.7
72 k 2.2*
59 + 0.8
207 f 4.0
250 f 13**
204 31 4.2
223 f 2.5
269 f ll**
221 z!z 2.6
450 + 9.0
590 k 28$
440 f 9.0
438 -I 8.5
515 2 20f
429 zk 9.1
52 AZ 0.9
87 ?I 4.2#
49 + 0.8
56 + 0.9
92 f 3.4$
53 Ifr 0.7
173 * 1.5
259 k 5.8**
163 + 1.3
174 -t 2.8
252 -+ 8.8$
159 zk 2.4
410 k 7.0
719 t 22-J
353 5 5.4
576 + 10
883 + 22$
487 + 8.7
For each age data from at least 500 cells from three sections of thoracic (Th) and lumbar (L) ganglia are shown. For
each trk the mean soma area + SE of three groups is shown: DRG denotes the mean soma area of all neurons within
the ganglion, trk denotes the mean soma area neurons expressing the particular trk shown, and non-trk denotes neurons
that do not express that particular trk.
* Values not significantly different from total DRG neuronal population (p z 0.05 by Student’s t test).
** Values significantly different from total DRG neuronal population (p < 0.02 by Student’s t test).
t Values significantly different from total DRG neuronal population (p < 0.005 by Student’s t test).
$ Values significantly different from total DRG neuronal population 0, < 0.001 by Student’s t test).
The Journal of Neuroscience, September 1993, 73(9) 4035
neurons express trkA, 10% of neurons express trkC, and about
6% of neurons express trkB. Although the absolute number of
neurons expressing all of the trks was greater in the lumbar
DRGs, we found little difference in percentages of neurons ex-
pressing different trks between thoracic and lumbar DRGs. The
situation at PN21 is more complex in that superficial versus
deeper regions of the ganglia seem to vary slightly in percentages
of cells expressing different trks. This issue is currently under
We next examined the positions of cells expressing different
neurotrophin receptor genes at E 15 and PN 1 by making detailed
camera lucida tracings of DRGs and noting the position of
neurons expressing different trks. These tracings are shown in
Figure 3. The positions of DRG neurons expressing a particular
trk are denoted by solid profiles, whereas the positions of no-
nexpressing neurons are denoted by the open profiles. For each
of the trk populations, labeled neurons were distributed through-
out the ganglion. trkA-expressing neurons were sometimes clus-
tered in small groups, but these clusters were evenly distributed
throughout all regions of the DRG. trkB- and trkC-expressing
neurons were also distributed throughout the DRG, although
there was a tendency for these neurons to be located toward the
periphery. There were no discernable difference in these patterns
between E 15 and PN 1.
Morphological characteristics of DRG neurons expressing
d@erent neurotrophin receptors
It was apparent on high-power bright-field examination of our
material that particular neurotrophin receptors were expressed
by DRG neurons having different morphological characteristics.
By E 13, it was already apparent that expression of each trk was
restricted to a subset of DRG neurons. In Figure 4, A and B
show patterns of expression of trkA and trkC, respectively, at
El 3. DRG neurons expressing a particular trk are denoted by
arrows, whereas nonexpressing neurons are denoted by an as-
terisk over the nucleus. Clearly, many DRG neurons do not
express trkA (Fig. 4A, asterisks) at this age. Similarly, many
DRG neurons do not express trkC at El3 (Fig. 4B, asterisks).
trkB also was expressed by only a subset of DRG neurons at
E 13 (data not shown). Figure 4, C and D, shows trkA and trkC
expression, respectively, at El 5. By this age, it is apparent that
DRG neurons expressing trkA(Fig. 4C, arrows) are smaller than
non-trkA-expressing neurons (Fig. 4C, asterisks). In contrast,
DRG neurons expressing trkC (Fig. 40, arrows) are larger than
non-trkC-expressing neurons (Fig. 40, asterisks). trkB-express-
ing neurons were of intermediate size (data not shown).
In mature mammals, DRG neurons can be divided on mor-
phological grounds into two categories: small, darkly staining
cells and large, lightly staining cells (see Lawson, 1992, for a
review). Examination of our material at PN21 revealed that
neurotrophin receptor expression was segregated according to
cell size and staining characteristics. For example, in Figure 5
it is apparent that the neurons expressing trkA (Fig. 5A,B, ar-
rows; 5C, dots) are, in general, smaller than neurons that do not
express trkA (Fig. 5A-C, asterisks) and also are smaller than
the neurons that express trkC (Fig. 5G,H, arrows; 51, dots). In
contrast, DRG neurons that express trkC (Fig. 5G,H, arrows;
51, dots) are larger than non-trkC-expressing neurons (Fig. 5G-
I, asterisks) and also clearly larger than neurons that express
trkA (Fig. 5A,B, arrows; SC, dots). Neurons expressing trkB are
of intermediate size (Fig. 5D,E, arrows; 5F, dots). In general,
neurons expressing trkC and trkB were large with lightly stained
cytoplasm, whereas neurons expressing trkA were small with
more darkly stained cytoplasm.
This qualitative impression of size differences was confirmed
by the construction of size-frequency histograms (Fig. 6). For
this work over 500 neuronal profiles in lumbar DRGs for each
neurotrophin receptor at each developmental stage were as-
sessed. The distributions of soma areas of the neurons labeled
by the indicated neurotrophin receptor probe are rendered by
the open bars in the histograms. The distributions of soma areas
from nonlabeled neurons are shown by the solid bars. Although
there is overlap, it is apparent at each developmental stage that
trkA-expressing neurons (top row) are smaller than non-trkA-
expressing neurons. Furthermore, at PN 1 and PN2 1, virtually
all of the DRG neurons with the smallest cross-sectional areas
are trkA positive. In contrast, trkC-expressing neurons (bottom
row) are larger than non-trkC-expressing neurons at every de-
velopmental stage. It is also clear that trkC-expressing neurons
are the largest DRG neurons. Finally, trkB-expressing neurons
(middle row) occupy an intermediate range. None ofthe smallest
and few of the largest DRG neurons express trkB. These dif-
ferences in distributions of soma areas of DRG neurons ex-
pressing the different neurotrophin receptors were present by
E 15 and persisted throughout development. Size-frequency his-
tograms constructed from soma areas of neurons in thoracic
DRGs (not shown) were similar to those shown for lumbar
DRGs in Figure 6.
In Table 2 are shown mean soma areas of all DRG neurons
(DRG), DRG neurons expressing a particular trk (trk), and neu-
rons not expressing that trk (non-trk) at different developmental
stages in thoracic (Th) and lumbar (L) ganglia. At every age in
both thoracic and lumbar ganglia, the mean soma area of trkA-
expressing cells was significantly smaller than the mean of non-
trkA-expressing neurons and the mean of all neurons in the
DRG. In contrast, mean soma areas of trkC-expressing DRG
neurons were larger than those of non-trkC-expressing cells as
well as those of all DRG neurons. trkB-expressing DRG neurons
also had significantly larger soma areas than non-trkB cells at
every age and were significantly larger than all DRG neurons
Neurotrophin receptors are expressed early in DRG
In this study we have shown that genes for all three trks are
expressed in rat DRGs at an early stage of development. Thus,
expression of trks is readily apparent by El 3, which is only 24-
48 hr after neurogenesis begins (Lawson et al., 1974; Altman
and Bayer, 1984). Our preliminary observations suggest that all
three trks are expressed in DRGs even earlier, at E 12 (X.-J. Mu,
I. Silos-Santiago, W. D. Snider, unpublished observations). We
have not yet determined the earliest age at which expression
appears. The function of this early expression of neurotrophin
receptors by DRG cells is unknown. Studies using quail neural
crest primary cultures have suggested that BDNF may influence
differentiation of pluripotent neural crest cells along the primary
sensory neuron lineage (Sieber-Blum, 1991). It is possible that
DRG cells at E 12 and E 13 may require neurotrophins for dif-
ferentiation into different functional classes or for survival prior
to gaining access to factors from their targets (Wright et al.,
1992; Wyatt et al., 1992). We could not determine the per-
centages of DRG cells that expressed different trks at E13.
Figure 5. Low-power
(left column) and high-power
(middle column) bright-field
views and camera lucida drawings; left column shows morphological
characteristics of DRG neurons
expressing different members of the trk family at PN2 1: trkA (A-C), trkB (D-F), trkC (G-Z). For each member of the trk family, it is obvious in every field that some DRG neurons express
the particular trk (arrows) and some DRG neurons show no expression (asterisb). Furthermore,
the different trks are expressed by DRG neurons of different sizes. For example, in A and
B small neurons (arrows) express trkA whereas larger neurons (asterisks) are negative. In D and E, neurons of intermediate
size express trkB (arrows). In G and H the pattern is opposite
that shown in A and B: large neurons (arrows) express trkC whereas small neurons (asterisks) are negative. The same fields shown in B, E, and H are depicted in the camera lucida drawings
in C, F, and I. For each probe, labeled neurons are indicated by dots and the unlabeled neurons are denoted by asterisks. Scale bars: A, D, G, 2.5 pm; B, E, H, 12.5 pm.
The Journal of Neuroscience, September 1993, C’(9) 4037
Therefore, we do not yet know whether DRG cells at early stages
express multiple trks (see also Ernfors et al., 1992).
By E 15, neurotrophin receptor genes are expressed in distinct
patterns in DRGs (see below). These patterns of neurotrophin
receptor gene expression in DRGs appear to change little be-
tween E 15 and maturity. Thus, percentages and morphological
characteristics of DRG neurons expressing different members
of the trk family were stable between E 15 and PN2 1. Assuming
that expression of a particular trk determines neurotrophin de-
pendence (see Carroll et al., 1992) our findings suggest that
neurotrophin requirements of DRG neurons are established by
El5 and do not undergo major shifts subsequently. It should
be emphasized, however, that a stable pattern of trk expression
does not necessarily imply regulation by a single neurotrophin,
as work in vitro raises the possibility that some neurotrophins
may activate multiple trks (Berkemeier et al., 1991; Cordon-
Cardo et al., 1991; Soppet et al., 1991; Squint0 et al., 1991; but
see Ip et al., 1993).
It is important to relate the pattern of trk expression in DRGs
we describe here to the known information about neurotrophin
synthesis in the peripheral and central target fields of DRG
neurons. It has been established that NGF, BDNF, and NT-3
are all synthesized in some peripheral targets of DRG cells by
E 11.5 in mouse (Schecterson and Bothwell, 1992). Furthermore,
NT-3 is synthesized in the ventral horn ofthe spinal cord starting
at E 13 in rat (Ernfors and Persson, 199 1). Finally, BDNF and
NT-3 are synthesized locally within DRGs by El3 in rat and
by El 5 in mouse (Ernfors and Persson, 199 1; Emfors et al.,
1992; Schecterson and Bothwell, 1992). Thus, our demonstra-
tion that trk genes are expressed by E 13 in rat DRGs suggests
that DRG neurons are capable of responding to neurotrophins
that are synthesized in their peripheral and central target fields
as well as locally at early developmental stages. These obser-
vations thus support the idea that BDNF and NT-3, as well as
NGF, are important determinants of DRG development in vivo.
Many important aspects of DRG neuronal development, such
as formation of laminar-specific connections in spinal cord, in-
nervation of characteristic end organs in the periphery, devel-
opment of transmitter phenotype, and naturally occurring cell
death, occur well after E 13 (Fitzgerald, 1967, 1987; Hamburger
et al., 1981; Smith, 1983; Johnson et al., 1986; Davies et al.,
1987; Reynolds et al., 1991; Ruit et al., 1992; Snider et al.,
1992). Therefore, the observation that all three trks are ex-
pressed in DRGs by E 13 suggests the potential for neurotrophins
to regulate these developmental events.
A caveat in interpreting our results is that we have used probes
that code for regions of the extracellular domains of these neu-
rotrophin receptors. Recently, forms of trkB that lack the in-
tracellular tyrosine kinase domain have been described (Klein
et al., 1990, Middlemas et al., 199 1). Thus, for example, epen-
dymal cells lining ventricular surfaces in the CNS express a trkB
with no tyrosine kinase motif (Klein et al., 1990). Furthermore,
in certain regions of the nervous system, the ratios of tyrosine
kinase(+) versus tyrosine kinasec-) forms of trks change markedly
during development (Allendoerfer et al., 1992). Whether any of
the expression we have observed in developing DRGs is due to
neurotrophin receptors lacking tyrosine kinase domains remains
to be determined.
Distinct patterns of neurotrophin receptor gene expression in
A second finding of this study is that neurotrophin receptor
genes are expressed in rat DRGs in distinct patterns. We find
that the different members of the trk family are expressed by
different percentages of DRG neurons, that there are differences
in the morphological characteristics of the neurons expressing
different trks, and that there are differences in size-frequency
histograms of DRG neurons expressing the different trks.
trkA is clearly the member of the trk family expressed most
abundantly in developing DRGs. In this study, 3246% of DRG
neurons were shown to express trkA depending on the devel-
opmental stage and location of the ganglion studied. These per-
centages correspond well with the result of a previous study of
trkA expression and high-affinity NGF binding in adult rat lum-
bar DRGs by Verge et al. (1992). In that study, approximately
40% of DRG neurons expressed trkA and bound NGF with high
affinity. Despite this close agreement, there is a strong possibility
that both of these studies have underestimated the true number
of trkA-expressing cells in rat DRGs. These percentages for
trkA-expressing neurons are at odds with percentages of DRG
neuron loss caused by immune deprivation of NGF. Such stud-
ies in rats and guinea pigs have shown that 70-85% of DRG
neurons are lost in embryos deprived of NGF by autoimmunity
or passive transfer of antibodies (Gorin and Johnson, 1979;
Johnson et al., 1980; Ruit et al., 1992). Since DRG neurons
killed by NGF deprivation are now known to express trkA
(Carroll et al., 1992) 70-85% of DRG neurons should express
mRNA for this receptor.
There are several technical reasons why percentages of DRG
neurons expressing neurotrophin receptor genes might have been
underestimated in our study. (1) In order to obtain optimal
cellular morphology, we performed in situ hybridizations on
paraffin sections. Although we have not tested the issue system-
atically in our own studies, it has been suggested that in situ
hybridization may be less sensitive in paraffin than in frozen
material (Tecott et al., 1987). (2) We established a specific num-
ber of grains per cell profile as an objective criterion to consider
a cell positive for receptor gene expression. Some DRG neurons
that actually express mRNA for a member of the trk family
might not have met this criterion because of lack of probe sen-
sitivity or low levels of gene expression. (3) Cells on the surface
of the section are far more likely to be hybridized than cells in
the middle or bottom of the section. These middle and bottom
cells were counted in the number of cell profiles per section
given here, and many of these may not have had an optimal
opportunity for hybridization. Therefore, we conclude that the
determination of the absolute numbers and percentages of DRG
neurons expressing members of the trk family will require fur-
ther investigation. However, since we used the same method-
ology to compute percentages of positive cells for all three probes,
the ratios of DRG neurons expressing different neurotrophin
receptor genes presented here are likely to be accurate. In sup-
port of this idea, these ratios are very similar to those obtained
in a previous study that employed frozen rather than paraffin
sections (Carroll et al., 1992). Interestingly, If all DRG cells
expressed a member of the trk family, and the ratios of DRG
neurons expressing different trks were as given here, then NGF
deprivation should lesion approximately 75% of DRG neurons.
This degree of DRG cell loss would be in close agreement with
the published values (Gorin and Johnson, 1979; Johnson et al.,
1980; Ruit et al., 1992).
Our results are in conflict with those of a previous study that
suggested that all DRG neurons express trkA (Schecterson and
Bothwell, 1992). We are confident that our conclusion that trkA
is not expressed by all DRG neurons is correct for three reasons.
(1) Even if observations were confined to cells on the surface of
trk A trk 6
the section and if the criteria for positivity were relaxed to
include neurons that had only five grains in a cell profile (data
not shown), there were still many neurons in every DRG section
to which our trkA probe did not hybridize. (2) trkA-expressing
neurons in our study had different sizes and morphological char-
acteristics than did non-trkA-expressing DRG neurons. This
observation supports our contention that trkA expression may
be restricted to subsets of neurons within the DRG. (3) Finally,
in a previous study we have shown that DRG neurons expressing
different trks differ in their sensitivity to NGF (Carroll et al.,
1992). DRG neurons expressing trkA
privation in utero, whereas DRG neurons expressing trkB and
trkC are NGF independent. If every neuron in the DRG ex-
pressed trkA, then trkA should have been detected in the DRG
neurons that survived NGF deprivation.
Our results support the idea that DRG neurons belonging to
different functional classes express different members of the trk
family. In this study we have shown that DRG neurons ex-
pressing different trks have different morphological character-
istics. DRG neurons expressing trkA are mainly small neurons
with dark cytoplasm. These may correspond to the small, dark
neurons in DRGs long recognized on the basis of morphological
observations (see Willis and Coggeshall; 199 1 and Lawson, 1992,
for reviews). In contrast, trkB and trkC are expressed by large
neurons with abundant cytoplasm and large, pale nuclei. These
may correspond to the large, light neurons described in previous
anatomical studies (for reviews, see Willis and Coggeshall, 199 1;
Lawson, 1992). Furthermore, size-frequency histograms of DRG
neurons expressing different trks are markedly different. DRG
neurons expressing trkA are the smallest cells in the DRG and
have mean soma areas significantly smaller than non-trkA neu-
rons. The largest DRG neurons do not express trkA. In contrast,
trkC is expressed by the largest DRG neurons, and trkC-ex-
pressing cells have much larger soma areas than non-trkc-ex-
pressing cells. trkC is not expressed by the smallest DRG neu-
rons. DRG neurons expressing trkB are of intermediate size.
None of the smallest DRG neurons express trkB and trkB-
expressing neurons make up a small minority of the very largest
DRG neurons. This segregation of neurotrophin receptor genes
according to cell size is present by E 15 and is stable throughout
development. It is important to point out that cell size is not
an absolute correlate of function (see below). However, in gen-
eral, DRG neurons with unmyelinated or lightly myelinated
axons that subserve pain and temperature have smaller somata
than DRG neurons that have heavily myelinated axons and
subserve proprioceptive functions (Lawson and Waddell, 199 1;
see Lawson, 1992, for a review).
It is possible, based on the work presented here and in pre-
vious studies, tentatively to correlate neurotrophin receptor gene
expression with the functional class of DRG neurons. The small,
dark DRG neurons, shown to express trkA in the present study,
include distinct and overlapping neuronal populations that ex-
press substance P (Hokfelt et al., 1975; McCarthy and Lawson,
1989), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP; Wiesenfeld-Hal-
lin et al., 1984; Skofitsch and Jacobwitz, 1985; McNeil et al.,
are killed by NGF de-
The Journal of Neuroscience, September 1993, 13(9) 4039
1989), fluoride-resistant acid phosphatase (FRAP, Knyihar-
Csillik and Csillik, 198 1; Nagy and Hunt, 1982; Silverman and
Kruger, 1988), and a cell adhesion molecule, E-cadherin (Shi-
mamura et al., 1992). Furthermore, some of these neurons are
labeled by lectins such as PNA and GSA I-B4 (Streit et al., 1985;
Silverman and Kruger, 1988) and antibodies to certain oligo-
saccharides, particularly A5, LA4, and 2C5 (Jesse11 and Dodd,
1986; see Lawson, 1992, for a review). Substance P, CGRP,
FRAP, LA4, 2C5, GSA I-B4, and E-cadherin are all found in
laminae I and II of the dorsal horn, consistent with a role for
DRG cells that express these molecules in subserving pain and
thermal receptive functions (see Hunt et al., 1992, for a review).
The small, dark DRG neurons are also preferentially sensitive
to capsaicin, which lesions nociceptive afferents (see Lawson,
1992, for a review).
It is now established that DRG neurons that express trkA
require NGF for survival in vivo (Carroll et al., 1992). That
NGF supports DRG neurons that subserve nociception is sug-
gested by studies showing that NGF-deprived embryos do not
feel pain in the neonatal period (Johnson et al., 1980) that NGF-
sensitive DRG neurons project to laminae I and II of the dorsal
horn (Ruit et al., 1992) and that myelinated nociceptors are
depleted by neonatal NGF deprivation (Ritter et al., 199 1; Lew-
in et al., 1992). Finally, it has recently been demonstrated that
NGF mRNA is expressed predominantly in superficial layers
of developing skin (Schecterson and Bothwell, 1992), consistent
with an ability to support nociceptive and thermoreceptive af-
ferents. On the basis of all of these observations, we suggest that
DRG neurons that express trkA
In contrast, DRG neurons with larger soma areas, shown to
express trkB and trkC
in this study, are known to be NGF
independent (Gorin and Johnson, 1979; Johnson et al., 1983;
Miyata et al., 1986; Carroll et al., 1992; Ruit et al., 1992). NGF-
independent neurons project to laminae III-VI
horn and to the ventral horn, the spinal target fields of low-
threshold mechanoreceptors, and proprioceptors (Ruit et al.,
1992). It has recently been demonstrated that anti-NGF has no
effect on the survival or physiological properties of hair follicle
and other cutaneous A@ afferents (Lewin et al., 1992) further
suggesting that many classes of low-threshold mechanoreceptors
may be NGF independent. Another observation consistent with
this idea is that BDNF is expressed in deeper layers of skin than
NGF in a logical location to support low-threshold mechano-
receptors such as hair follicle afferents (Schecterson and Both-
well, 1992). NT-3 is expressed in both muscle and the motor
pool of the spinal cord and is therefore available in both the
peripheral and central target fields of group Ia DRG neurons
that project to muscle spindles and have monosynaptic contact
with motor neurons. Thus, at least some DRG neurons that
express trkC are likely to be proprioceptors. In support of this
idea, a recent study has shown that large DRG neurons in chick
that project to muscle require NT-3 for survival in vitro (Hory-
Lee et al., 1993). Taken together, all of these observations sug-
gest that trkB- and trkC-expressing neurons may subserve tactile
subserve pain and thermal
in the dorsal
each histogram percentages of trk-expressing
frequencies of soma areas of DRG neurons that do not express the particular
expressing neurons (top row) have smaller soma areas than non-trkA-expressing
soma areas that are larger than non-trkC-expressing
Size-frequency histograms of DRG neurons in lumbar ganglia expressing different members of the trk family during development. For
neurons having a particular soma area are indicated by the open bars. The solid bars indicate the
Soma areas are in pm2. At every age, trkA-
neurons. In contrast, trkC-expressing
neurons. The soma areas of trkB-expressing neurons (middle row) are intermediate.
trk being displayed.
neurons (bottom row) have
4040 Mu et al. * Expression of frks in Developing DRGs
and proprioceptive functions. More specifically, it is reasonable
to hypothesize that trkC-expressing neurons subserve proprio-
ceptive functions whereas trkB-expressing neurons may be pre-
dominantly low-threshold mechanoreceptors.
A number of questions remain unanswered by this study. (1)
Do all DRG neurons express a member of the trk family? The
percentages in this study suggest that there may be a large pop-
ulation of non-trk-expressing cells in mammalian DRG (see also
Verge et al., 1992). However, for the reasons outlined above we
feel it is premature to draw such a conclusion at present. It
should also be noted that additional members of the trk family
may exist that have not yet been characterized. (2) Do DRG
neurons express a single or multiple members of the trk family?
Our findings that different trks are expressed in cells with dif-
ferent morphological characteristics (the present study) and that
immune deprivation of NGF kills the trkA population but spares
the populations expressing trkB and trkC (Carroll et al., 1992)
suggest expression of a single trk by DRG neurons. However,
neither of these observations proves that DRG neurons do not
express multiple trks. Indeed, both NGF and BDNF are capable
of supporting the majority of chick DRG neurons in vitro, sug-
gesting the possibility that some DRG neurons express both
trkA and trkB (Lindsay et al., 1985; Davies et al., 1986). Fur-
thermore, in the CNS it is apparent that many classes of neurons
express both trkB and trkC. Thus, the issue of whether DRG
neurons express multiple trks will require further investigation.
(3) What are the functions of DRG neurons expressing different
members of the trk family? The work presented here, although
highly suggestive, is not definitive in this regard. The recent
descriptions of antibodies specific for different members of the
trk family (Rush et al., 1992; Smith-Swintosky
1992; Spoerri et al., 1992; Tassone et al., 1992) should allow
colocalization of trk expression with antibody markers and ret-
rograde tracing to characterize further the functional classes of
DRG neurons that express different neurotrophin receptors.
Note added in proof
Since acceptance of this article, another article dealing with
expression of neurotrophin receptor genes in DRGs has ap-
peared: Ernfors et al. (1993).
that activates irk and trkB. Neuron 7:857-866.
Bothwell M (199 1) Keeping track of neurotrophin
Brown AG (198 1) Organization
Carroll SL, Silos-Santiago
WD (1992) Dorsal root ganglia neurons expressing trkare selectively
sensitive to NGF deprivation in utero. Neuron
Cordon-Cardo C, Tapley P, Jing S, Nanduri
F, Kovary K, Klein R, Jones KR, Reichardt LF, Barbacid M (199 1)
The trk tyrosine protein kinase mediates the mitogenic
nerve growth factor and neurotrophin-3.
Davies AM, Thoenen H, Barde YA
sensory neurons to brain-derived
KL, Cabelli RJ, Escandon E, Nikolics K, Shatz CJ (1992)
regulation of neurotrophic
visual system. Sot Neurosci Abstr 18:228.
J. Baver SA (1984) The development
LR, Wilslow JW, Kaplan DR, Nikolics
A (199 1) Neurotrophin-5:
factors receptors in the
of the rat spinal cord.
K, Goeddel DV,
factor a novel neurotrophic
receptors. Cell 65:
in the spinal cord. New York: Spring-
I, Frese SE, Ruit KG, Milbrandt J, Snider
V, G’Rourke E, Lamballe
Cell 66: 173-l 83.
(1986) The response of chick
neurotrophic factor. J Neurosci
Davies AM, Bandtlow C, Heumann
H (1987) Timing
veloping skin in relation to innervation
Emfors P, Persson H (199 1) Developmentally
of BDNF mRNA in embryonic
Emfors P, Merlio J-P, Persson H (1992)
neurotrophins and their receptors during embryonic rat development.
Eur J Neurosci 4:1140-l 158.
Emfors P, Rosario CM, Merlio J-P, Grant G, Aldskogius
H (1993) Expression of mRNAs
dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord during development
ina ueripheral or central axotomv.
Fitzgerald‘MJT (1967) Perinatal changes in epidermal
rat and mouse. J Comp Neurol 126:37-42.
Fitzgerald M (1987) Prenatal growth of fine diameter primary afferents
into the rat spinal cord: a transganglionic tracer study. J Comp Neurol
Gorin PD, Johnson EM (1979) Experimental
nerve growth factor deprivation: effects on developing peripheral sym-
pathetic and sensory neurons. Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA 76:5382-
Hamburger V, Brunso-Bechtold JK, Yip JW (198 1) Neuronal
in the spinal ganglia of the chick embryo and its reduction
growth factor. J Neurosci 1:60-7 1.
Hohn A, Leibrook J, Bailey K, Barde YA
characterization of a novel member of the nerve growth factor/brain
derived neurotrophic factor family. Nature 344:339-34
Hijkfelt T, Kellerth JO, Nilsson G, Pemow B (1975)
localization in the central nervous system and in some primary sen-
sory neurons. Science 190:889-890.
Hory-Lee F, Russell M, Lindsay RM, Frank E (1993)
3 supports the survival of developing
ture. Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA 90:26 13-26 17.
Hunt SP, Mantyh PW, Priestly JV (1992) The organization of bio-
chemically characterized sensory neurons. In: Sensory neurons (Scott
SA, ed), pp 60-76. New York: Oxford UP.
Ip N, Stitt TN, Tapley P, Klein R, Greene LA, Barbacid N, Yanco-
poulos GD (1993) Similarities and differences in the way neurotro-
phins interact with the trk receptors in neuronal and nonneuronal
cells. Neuron 10: 137-149.
Jacobson M (199 1) Developmental
Jesse11 TM, Dodd J (1986) Neurotransmitters
tigens in subsets of sensory neurons projecting
horn. In: Neuropeptides in neurologic and psychiatric disease (Martin
JB, Barchas JD, eds), pp 113-122.
Johnson EM Jr, Gorin PD, Brandeis LD, Pearson J (1980)
root ganglion neurons are destroyed by exposure in utero to maternal
antibody to nerve growth factor. Science 2 19:9 16-9 18.
Johnson EM Jr, Osborne PA, Rydel RE, Schmidt RE, Pearson J (1983)
Characterization of the effects of autoimmune
deprivation in the developing guinea-pig.
Johnson EM Jr. Rich KM. Yin HK (1986)
neurons in-ho. Trends Ne’urosci b:33-37.
Kaplan DR, Martin-Zanca D, Parada LF
phorylation and tyrosine kinase activity
product induced by NGF. Nature 350: 158-l 60.
Kaplan DR, Hempstead BL, Martin-Zanca
(199 1 b) The trk proto-oncogene product: a signal transducing recep-
tor for nerve growth factor. Science 252:554-558.
Kessler JA, Black IB (1980) Nerve growth factor stimulates
velopment of substance P in sensory ganglia. Proc Nat1 Acad Sci USA
Klein R, Parada LF, Coulier F, Barbacid
tyrosine protein kinase receptor expressed during mouse neural de-
velopment. EMBO J 8:3701-3709.
Klein R, Conway D, Parada LF, Barbacid M (1990)
kinase gene codes for a second neurogenic
catalytic kinase domain. Cell 6 1:647-656.
Klein R, Jing S, Nanduri V, O’Rourke
proto-oncogene encodes a receptor for nerve growth factor. Cell 65:
Knyihar-Csillik E, Csillik B (198 1) Histochemistry
nociceptive neuron. J Histochem
R, Korsehing S, Rohrer H, Theonen
and site of nerve growth factor synthesis in de-
and expression of the receptor.
regulated expression of
in rat spinal cord motor neurons and expression
dorsal root ganglion. Em J Neurosci
Cells expressing mRNA for
receptors in the
Mol Brain Res 17:2 17-223.
autoimmune model of
(1990) Identification and
muscle sensory neurons in cul-
neurobiology. New York: Plenum.
to the spinal dorsal
New York: Raven.
nerve growth factor
The role of NGF in sensorv
of the trk proto-oncogene
D, Chao MV, Parada LF
M (1989) trkB, a novel
The trkB tyrosine
receptor that lacks the
E, Barbacid M (199 1) The trk
of the primary
The Journal of Neuroscience, September 1993, 73(9) 4041 Download full-text
Larnballe F, Klein R, Barbacid M (199 1) trkC, a new member of the
trk family of tyrosine protein kinases, is a receptor for neurotrophin-
3. Cell 66967-979.
Lawson SN (1992) Morphological
sory neurons. In: Sensory neurons (Scott SA, ed), pp 27-59.
York: Oxford UP.
Lawson SN, Waddell PJ (199 1) Soma nemofilament
ity is related to cell size and fiber conduction
sensory neurones. J Physiol (Lond) 435:41-63.
Lawson SN, Caddy KWT, Biscoe TJ (1974)
root ganglion neurones. Studies of cell birthdays and changes in mean
cell diameter. Cell Tissue Res 153:399-4
Leibrock J, Lottspeich F, Hohn A, Hofer M, Hengerer B, Masiakowski
P, Thoenen H, Barde Y-A (1989)
of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Nature 34 I: 149-I 52.
Irwin GR, Ritter AM, Mendel LM
factor in the development of myelinated
Lindsay RM, Thoenen H, Barde YA (1985)
derived sensory neurons are responsive at early developmental
to brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Dev Biol 112:319-328.
Maisonpierre PC, Belluscio L, Squint0 S, Ip NY, Firth ME, Lindsay
RM, Yancopoulos G (1990) Neurotrophin-3:
related to NGF and BDNF. Science 247: 1446-I 45 1.
Martin-Zanca D, Barbacid M, Parada LF (1990)
proto-oncogene is restricted to the sensory cranial and spinal ganglia
of neural crest origin in mouse development.
McCarthy PW, Lawson SN (1989)
of rat primary sensory neurons with substance P-like immunoreac-
tivity. Neuroscience 28:745-753.
McNeil DL, Westlund KN, Coggeshall RE (1989)
reactivity ofunmyelinated primary afferent axons in rat lumbar dorsal
roots. J Histochem Cvtochem 37:1047-1052.
Merlio J:P, Emfors P, Jaber M, Persson H (1992)
of rat trkC and distribution of cells expressing messenger RNAs for
members of the trk family in the rat central nervous system. Neu-
roscience 5 I:5 13-532.
Middlemas DS, Lindberg RA, Hunter T (I 99 1) trkB, a neural receptor
protein-tyrosine kinase: evidence for a full-length
receptors. Mol Cell Biol 11:143-153.
Miyata Y, Kashihara Y, Homma S, Kuno M (1986)
growth factor on the survival and synaptic function
neurons axotomized in neonatal rats. J Neurosci 6:20 12-20 18.
Nagy JI, Hunt SP (1982) Fluoride-resistant
taining neurons in dorsal root ganglia are separate from those con-
taining substance P or somatostatin.
Otten U, Goedert M, Mayer N, Lembeck
nerve growth factor for development
sory neurons. Nature 287: 158-I 59.
Per1 ER (1992) Function of dorsal root ganglion neurons: an overview.
In: Sensory neurons (Scott SA, ed), pp 3-23. New York: Oxford UP.
Reynolds ML, Fitzgerald M, Benowitz LI (199 1) GAP-43 expression
in developing cutaneous and muscle nerves in the rat hindlimb.
roscience 4 I:20 l-2 I 1.
Ritter AM, Lewin GR, Kremer NE, Mendell LM
for nerve growth factor in the development
in viva Nature 350:500-502.
Ruit KG, Elliott JL, Osborne PA, Yan Q, Snider WD (1992)
dependence of mammalian dorsal root ganglion
growth factor during embryonic development.
Rush RA. Zhou XF. Parada L (1992)
kinase immunoreactivity in the rat central nervous system. S&c Neu-
rosci Abstr 18:227.
Schecterson LC, Bothwell M (1992)
suggested by BDNF and NT-3 mRNA
rons. Neuron 9:4491163.
Scott SA (1992) The development
patterns. In: Sensory neurons (Scott SA, ed), pp 242-263.
Shimamura K, Takahashi T, Takeichi M (1992)
in a particular subset of sensory neurons. Dev Biol 152:242-254.
and biochemical cell types of sen-
velocity in rat primary
Development ofrat dorsal
Molecular cloning and expression
(1992) On the role of nerve growth
nociceptors. J Neurosci 12:
Placode and neural crest-
a neurotrophic factor
Expression of the trk
Genes Dev 4:638-694.
Cell type and conduction velocity
and two truncated
Effects of nerve
of Ia sensory
acid phosphatase con-
of substance P-containing
(199 1) Requirement
of myelinated nociceptors
neurons on nerve
Distribution of trkB tvrosine
Novel roles for neurotrophins
expression in developing
of peripheral sensory innervation
NGF in the commitment
Silverman JD, Kruger L (1988) Acid phosphatase as a selective marker
for a class of small sensory ganglion
species: spinal cord distribution,
tion to fluoride-resistant acid phosphatase
matosens Res 5:2 19-246.
Skofitsch G, Jacobowitz DM (1985)
detailed immunocytochemical distribution
tem. Peptides 6:72 l-745.
Smith CL (1983) The development
mary afferent projections to the rat thoracic spinal cord. J Comp
Smith-Swintosky VL, Mattson MP (1992)
of functional low affinity and trkA NGF receptors in cultured hip-
pocampal neurons. Sot Neurosci Abstr 18:95 1.
Snider WD, Zhang L, Yusoof S, Gorukanti
teraction between dorsal root axons and their target motor neurons
in developing mammalian spinal cord. J Neurosci
Soppet D, Escandon E, Maragos J, Middlemas
Burton LE, Stanton BR, Kaplan DR, Hunter T, Nikolics K, Parada
LF (199 1) The neurotrophic factors brain-derived
tor and neurotrophin-3 are ligands for the trkB tyrosine kinase re-
ceptor. Cell 65:895-903.
Spoerri P, Petrelli R, Dal Toso R, Skaper SE (1992)
structural localization of low- and high-affinity
neural cells. Sot Neurosci Abstr 18: 1100.
Squint0 SP, Stitt TN, Aldrich TH, Davis S, Bianco SM, Radziejewski
C, Glass DJ, Masiakowski P, Furth ME, Valenzuela DM, DiStefano
PS, Yancopoulos GD (199 1) trkB encodes a functional
brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3
growth factor. Cell 65:885-893.
Streit WJ, Schulte BA, Balentine JB, Spicer SS (1985)
localization of galactose containing
rons and their processes in the central and peripheral nervous system
of the rat. J Histochem Cvtochem
Tassone JI, Yokoyama M, Black IB, Dryfus CF (1992)
of NGF binding sites to trk and p75 expressing cells in basal forebrain
cultures. Sot Neurosci Abstr 18:948.
Tecott LH, Eberwine JH, Barchas JD, Valentino
odological considerations in the utilization
Eberwine JH. Barchas JD. eds). DD 3-24.
Verge VMK, Merlio JP, Grondin J; Emfors P, Persson H, Riopelle RJ,
Hijkfelt T, Richardson PM (1992)
sites, trk mRNA, and low-affinity
sensory neurons: response to injury and infusion of NGF. J Neurosci
12:40 I 14022.
Wanaka A, Johnson EM Jr, Mildbrandt
receptor mRNA in the rat adult central nervous system by in situ
hybridization. Neuron 5:267-28 1.
Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z, Hijkfelt T, Lundberg
ineke M, Tschopp FA, Fisher JA (1984)
gene-related peptide and substance P co-exist in sensory neurons to
the spinal cord and interact in spinal behavioral
Neurosci Lett 52: 199-204.
Willis WD, Coggeshall RE (199 1) Sensory mechanisms
cord. New York: Plenum.
Wright EM, Vogel KS, Davies AM
mote the maturation of developing
come dependent on these factors for survival. Neuron 9: 139-l 50.
Wyatt S, Parada L, Meakin SO, Davies A (1992) Regulation of p75NGF
expression in developing
with innervation and changes in neurotrophic
Sot Neurosci Abstr 18: 1290.
Yeh HJ, Ruit KG, Wang YX, Parks WC, Snider WD, Deuel TF (199 1)
PDGF A-chain gene is expressed by mammalian
velopment and in maturity. Cell 64:209-216.
M (199 1) Role of the neurotrophic
factors BDNF and
neural crest cells. Neuron
cells in several mammalian
(FRAP) of rodents. So-
in the central nervous sys-
and postnatal organization of pri-
Evidence for the expression
N, Tsering C (1992) In-
DS, Reid SW, Blair J,
NGF receptors on
but not nerve
in sensory neu- glycoconiugates
KL (1987) Meth-
of in situ hybridization.
New York: Oxford UP.
NGF receptor mRNA
of NGF binding
J (1990) Localization of FGF
responses of the rat.
of the spinal
sensory neurons before they be-
Neurotrophic factors pro-
sensory neurons in relation
neurons during de-