Article

Treatment of acute bipolar depression: A review of the literature

Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie (Impact Factor: 2.55). 12/1995; 40(9):533-44.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Our goal was to ascertain the efficacy of various antidepressant treatments for acute bipolar depression.
English articles that reported on the efficacy of antidepressant treatments in bipolar depression were located by computerized Medline and manual search. These studies were systematically reviewed and response rates for each treatment were computed.
The available data suggest that mood stabilizers, MAOIs, cyclic antidepressants, and ECT are all effective in treating bipolar depression. All antidepressant treatments with the exception of mood stabilizers have been reported to induce a manic/hypomanic switch.
It is recommended that mood stabilizers may be the first step of treatment, followed by the addition of an antidepressant, especially a cyclic antidepressant. The specific symptoms profile of individual patients, such as anergic or psychotic features, may indicate more specific treatment options. ECT is an important measure for those who are pharmacotherapy-resistant or psychotic.

3 Followers
 · 
3 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Depressive symptoms in bipolar disorder generally predominate over hypomanic/manic symptoms and can be more difficult to treat. As a result, they are responsible for much of the suffering, morbidity, and mortality from this illness. However, there are many fewer randomized, controlled trials of treatments for bipolar depression than for unipolar depression, and this has led to much controversy and confusion regarding the best treatment strategies. A number of expert consensus panels have issued guidelines, taking into account the sum of the past and present literature, with treatment recommendations. This article examines historically relevant and recent randomized, controlled trials of acute treatments for bipolar depression in the context of the latest US expert consensus panel guidelines.
    No preview · Article · Dec 2006 · Current Psychosis and Therapeutics Reports
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We sought to determine whether depressive and mixed/cycling episodes were as responsive to standardized pharmacotherapeutic interventions as were manic episodes in bipolar 1 patients. As part of the Maintenance Therapies in Bipolar Disorder (MH29618, E. Frank, PI) study, forty-two acutely ill bipolar 1 patients who had been randomly assigned to one of two preliminary phase non-pharmacologic treatment strategies (interpersonal and social rhythm therapy [IPSRT] or a standard medication clinic approach) were treated according to a standardized pharmacotherapeutic protocol. Symptom severity was measured weekly with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale in order to assess symptomatic remission. Survival analysis with the proportional hazards model was performed on time to remission. Manic patients were significantly more likely to achieve clinical remission than the depressed patients (100 vs. 59%) and did so significantly more rapidly. The difference in proportion remitting and time to remission between the depressed and mixed/cycling groups was not statistically significant. No significant effect for non-pharmacologic treatment assignment was found. These results point to the need to develop more effective treatments for bipolar depression. They also suggest that psychotherapy has a limited impact in the acute phase treatment of bipolar episodes.
    No preview · Article · Feb 1997 · Depression and Anxiety
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although unipolar depression and bipolar depression are considered distinct entities both by clinicians and researchers, it is not clear whether a pathophysiological distinction, which is the bridge between etiology and treatment, exists between these two conditions. The objective of this paper was to systematically review the studies that examined the biological differences between unipolar and bipolar depression. Using computerized Medline and manual searches, we located and reviewed studies that directly compared patients with unipolar depression with bipolar depressed patients on at least one biological variable. The results showed that patients with bipolar depression had lower levels of urinary NE and its metabolites and lower platelet MAO activity, and higher platelet free and stimulated intracellular calcium levels compared with unipolar depressed patients, but none of the variables examined appeared to differentiate the two groups consistently. We discuss some of the methodological flaws that might have contributed to this, and suggest that further studies should control for such confounding variables.
    No preview · Article · Feb 1997 · Life Sciences
Show more