Article

Should We Still Use the Harris and Benedict Equations?

Nutrition in Clinical Practice (Impact Factor: 2.4). 07/1996; 11(3):99-103. DOI: 10.1177/011542659601100399
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Resting metabolic rate (RMR) is commonly predicted using the Harris-Benedict (HB) equations, but an overestimation of 10% to 15% is normally found. More recent studies have proposed equations with a better predictive value. In this study, we explore the relationship between measured RMR and HB in 67 healthy volunteers and in a data set from the literature and compared measured RMR with six more recent equations. Mean differences between RMR and HB were 21%, 12%, 10%, and 4% for the lowest to the highest RMR quartile, respectively, and 20%, 8%, 6%, and -4% for Owen's subjects. Among the six recent equations, only the World Health Organization (WHO) equations predicted RMR within 10% in 100% of the cases. Our results suggest that overestimation of RMR by HB is not a homogenous finding but is inversely related to RMR. This may have important implications for predicting RMR in women and in patients with diminished lean body mass. In addition, the WHO equations appear more precise than the HB equations.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Lilian De Jonge, Sep 19, 2014
  • Source
    • "Rate value of basal metabolism is especially important for diagnosing and treating several endocrinological diseases, as well as obesity. Because of that there are ongoing discussions in scientific literature about methods of calculating basal metabolism values using various formulae – Harris & Benedict (1919), the WHO committee and others (White & Seymour, 2005; Frankenfield et al., 2005; Garrel et al., 1996; Hayter & Henry, 1994; Tverskaya et al., 1998, etc.). Most contemporary authors consider the volume of cellular mass or the value of lean body mass the most important factor, as well as age, sex, constitution, race and ethnicity (Bosy- Westphal et al., 2009; McDuffie et al., 2004; St-Onge & Gallagher, 2010; Vermorel et al., 2005). "

    Full-text · Chapter · Mar 2012
  • Source
    • "BMR can be predicted by means of different equations. The Harris–Benedict equation (1919) is said to overestimate BMR by 10–15% (Daly et al, 1985; Garrel et al, 1996), while the Shofield and the FAO/WHO/UNU equation is said to be more precise (Garrel et al, 1996). In this study, the FAO/WHO/UNU equation (FAO/WHO/UNU expert Consultation , 1985, including only weight) was used to calculate BMR. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evaluation of dietary intakes and lifestyle factors of German vegans. Cross-sectional study. Germany. Subjects were recruited through journal advertisements. Of 868 volunteers, only 154 participated in all study segments (pre- and main questionnaire, two 9-day food frequency questionnaires, blood sampling) and fulfilled the following study criteria: vegan dietary intake at least 1 year prior to study start, minimum age of 18 y, no pregnancy or childbirth during the last 12 months. No interventions. All the 154 subjects had a comparatively low BMI (median 21.2 kg/m(2)), with an extremely low mean consumption of alcohol (0.77+/-3.14 g/day) and tobacco (96.8% were nonsmokers). Mean energy intake (total collective: 8.23+/-2.77 MJ) was higher in strict vegans than in moderate ones. Mean carbohydrate, fat, and protein intakes in proportion to energy (total collective: 57.1:29.7:11.6%) agreed with current recommendations. Recommended intakes for vitamins and minerals were attained through diet, except for calcium (median intake: 81.1% of recommendation), iodine (median: 40.6%), and cobalamin (median: 8.8%). For the male subgroup, the intake of a small amount of food of animal origin improved vitamin and mineral nutrient densities (except for zinc), whereas this was not the case for the female subgroup (except for calcium). In order to reach favourable vitamin and mineral intakes, vegans should consider taking supplements containing riboflavin, cobalamin, calcium, and iodine. Intake of total energy and protein should also be improved.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2003 · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In patients with chronic renal failure under haemodialysis, we investigated the inter-relationships and relative contributions of disease, haemodialysis and of nutrition related factors on the patients' Quality of Life. Collected data in 60 adult patients comprised: co-morbidities (multiple medicines, other chronic diseases), duration of renal failure and of haemodialysis (in months), % weight loss since haemodialysis, nutrient intake derived from diet history analysis (DIETPLAN5 2003, UK). The EuroQoL instrument that includes 5 dimensions, mobility, self-care, activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, and an overall health visual analogue scale evaluated QoL. Estimates of effect size attributed to each variable included in the general linear model revealed that 47% of patients' mobility/self-care scores were worsened by deficient protein/energy intake and 30% by weight loss =10%. Poor performance of usual activities was attributed in 45% to duration of haemodialysis and of disease, 70% to protein/energy/vitamin B12/zinc/iron deficits, and 20% to weight loss =10%. Pain/discomfort were worsened in 45% by the duration of haemodialysis and of disease, and in 15% by co-morbidities. Higher anxiety/depression were related in 43% to protein/energy/selenium & vitamin C deficits, in 40% to the duration of haemodialysis and of disease, in 10% to weight loss =10%, and in 3% to co-morbidities. Likewise, 47% of poor overall health was determined by protein/energy/vitamin B12/ zinc/selenium & vitamin C deficits, 25% by weight loss =10%, 10% by disease duration, and 7% by co-morbidities. Protein, antioxidants and key micronutrients involved in protein metabolism, did exert a major effect on patients' Quality of Life. Given the prevalence of nutrient deficits, the ensuing impaired functional capacity is likely to compromise QoL, timely nutrition is thus warranted.
    Preview · Article · Mar 2006 · Nutricion hospitalaria: organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Nutricion Parenteral y Enteral
Show more