Article

Sepsis, septicaemia, sepsis syndrome, and septic shock: The correct definition and use

Postgraduate Medical Journal (Impact Factor: 1.45). 03/1996; 72(844):66. DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.72.844.66
Source: PubMed

Full-text preview

Available from: bmj.com
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acute circulatory disorders are commonly associated with systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) and sepsis. During sepsis, microcirculatory perfusion is compromised leading to tissue hypoperfusion and potentially to multiple organ dysfunction. In the present study, acute lung injury (ALI), one of the major causes leading to SIRS and sepsis, was experimentally induced in six female pigs. To investigate the progress of body temperature distribution, measurements with a long-wave infrared camera were carried out. Temperature centralization was evidenced during ALI owing to impairments of peripheral perfusion. In addition, statistical analysis demonstrated strong correlations between (a) standard deviation of the skin temperature distribution (SD) and shock index (SI) (p<0.0005), (b) SD and mean arterial pressure (MAP) (p<0.0005), (c) ΔT/Δx and SI (p<0.0005), as well as between (d) ΔT/Δx and MAP (p<0.0005). For clarification purposes, ΔT/Δx is a parameter implemented to quantify the spatial temperature gradient. This pioneering study created promising results. It demonstrated the capacity of infrared thermography as well as of the indexes, SD and ΔT/Δx, to detect impairments in both circulation and tissue perfusion.
    Preview · Article · Apr 2014 · Biomedical Optics Express
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: National reports of a dramatic rise in sepsis incidence are largely based on analyses of administrative databases. It is unclear if these estimates are biased by changes in coding practices over time. Methods: We calculated linear trends in the annual incidence of septicemia, sepsis, and severe sepsis at 2 academic hospitals from 2003 to 2012 using 5 different claims methods and compared case identification rates to selected objective clinical markers, including positive blood cultures, vasopressors, and/or lactic acid levels. Results: The annual incidence of hospitalizations with sepsis claims increased over the decade, ranging from a 54% increase for the method combining septicemia, bacteremia, and fungemia codes (P < .001 for linear trend) to a 706% increase for explicit severe sepsis/septic shock codes (P = .001). In contrast, the incidence of hospitalizations with positive blood cultures decreased by 17% (P = .006), and hospitalizations with positive blood cultures with concurrent vasopressors and/or lactic acidosis remained stable (P = .098). The sensitivity of sepsis claims for capturing hospitalizations with positive blood cultures with concurrent vasopressors and/or lactic acidosis increased (P < .001 for all methods), whereas the proportion of septicemia hospitalizations with positive blood cultures decreased from 50% to 30% (P < .001). Conclusions: The incidence of hospitalizations with sepsis codes rose dramatically while hospitalizations with corresponding objective clinical markers remained stable or decreased. Coding for sepsis has become more inclusive, and septicemia diagnoses are increasingly being applied to patients without positive blood cultures. These changes likely explain some of the apparent rise in sepsis incidence and underscore the need for more reliable surveillance methods.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2014 · Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Administrative health data have been used to study sepsis in large population-based studies. Validity of these study findings depends largely on the quality of the administrative data source and the validity of the case definition used. We systematically reviewed the literature to assess the validity of case definitions of sepsis used with administrative data. Embase and MEDLINE were searched for published articles with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coded data used to define sepsis. Abstracts and full text articles were reviewed in duplicate. Data were abstracted from all eligible full text articles, including ICD-9 and/or ICD-10 based case definitions, sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV). Of 2317 individual studies identified, 12 full text articles met all eligibility criteria. A total of 38 sepsis case definitions were tested, which included over 130 different ICD codes. The most common ICD-9 codes were 038.x, 790.7, and 995.92 and ICD-10 codes were A40.x and A41.x. The PPV was reported in 10 studies, and ranged from 5.6% to 100% with a median of 50%. Other tests of diagnostic accuracy were only reported in some studies. Sn ranged from 5.9% to 82.3%, Sp ranged from 78.3% to 100% and NPV ranged from 62.1% to 99.7%. Validity of administrative data in recording sepsis varied substantially across individual studies and ICD definitions. Our work may serve as a reference point for consensus towards an improved harmonized ICD-coded definition of sepsis.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2015 · Critical care (London, England)