Safety of spinal and epidural anesthesia in parturients with chorioamnionitis

Department of Anesthesiology, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Regional anesthesia 01/1996; 21(5):436-41.
Source: PubMed


The safety of spinal and epidural anesthesia in patients with chorioamnionitis was explored.
A retrospective study was made of the charts of 517 parturients who had received epidural anesthesia and 14 who had received spinal anesthesia before delivery and whose placentas had subsequently been found to be positive for chorioamnionitis.
Of the 146 blood culture results that were reported, 13 were positive. Of these 13 blood cultures, 5 had been drawn within 6 hours after placement of the epidural block, and four of the five bacteremic patients did not receive antibiotics until after the regional anesthetic was administered. One quarter (11/45) of the patients who were febrile and three quarters (174/229) of those who had leukocytosis before their block received no antibiotics before the block was placed. After the epidural block was performed, the catheter was left in place for over 24 hours in 18% (46/260) of the women who spiked a fever and in 14% (18/130) of those who exhibited leukocytosis during that period. There was no report of an epidural or spinal abscess or of meningitis in any of the women in the study.
Conduction anesthesia may be safe in parturients with chorioamnionitis without prior antibiotic therapy.

53 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nous avons analysé les données de la littérature portant sur le risque infectieux au cours de l'anesthésie locorégionale et essayé d'apporter des recommandations pour sa prévention. Les données épidémiologiques sont en faveur d'une incidence très faible. Le risque de la pratique de l'ALR, lors des états infectieux, est mal évalué. Les données apparaissent contradictoires et la notion de bénéfices/risques doit être prise en compte, en particulier en obstétrique. Les précautions qu'il apparaît souhaitable de respecter sont exposées.
    No preview · Article · Dec 1998 · Annales Françaises d Anesthésie et de Réanimation
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When pregnant women are asked what they consider to be the risks of epidural analgesia, up to half volunteer nerve paralysis.1 Anaesthetists in Britain and Ireland in contrast have been reluctant to mention the possibility of nerve damage because it is so rare.2 This is not the case in the USA where 71% of anaesthetists regularly discuss neurological sequelae before epidural analgesia compared with 20% in the UK.3 The requirement for consent and the duty to inform the patient of material risks4,5 does not differ substantially between the USA and the UK. The likely difference then is not medicolegal, but possibly a result of cultural variations.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2000
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The traditional contraindications to any form of local anaesthesia that involves plunging a needle into unknown territory are coagulopathy and sepsis, although these are not the only risk factors for spinal haematoma and abscess. For neuraxial blockade in obstetrics, other contraindications might include circulatory disturbance and shortage of staff trained to apply the block or care for the parturient. None of these is absolute and all require some qualification. Many would add lack of consent to this list, but such a constraint applies to any treatment that is offered.
    No preview · Chapter · Jan 2000
Show more