ArticlePublisher preview available

A System for the Diagnosis of Specific Language Impairment in Kindergarten Children

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

A valid and reliable diagnostic standard for language impairment is required for the conduct of epidemiologic research on specific language disorder. A rationale is provided for such a diagnostic system labeled the EpiSLI system. This system employed five composite scores representing norm-referenced performance in three domains of language (vocabulary, grammar, and narration) and two modalities (comprehension and production). Children who have two or more composite scores below –1.25 standard deviations were considered as children with language disorder. The performance of the EpiSLI diagnostic system was examined on a sample of 1,502 kindergarten children and it was shown that this diagnostic system yielded results that were consistent with clinician rating and previous research results.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Journal
of
Speech
and Hearing
Research, Volume
39,
1284-1294,
December
1996
A
System
for
the
Diagnosis
of
Specific
Language
Impairment
in
Kindergarten
Children
J.
Bruce Tomblin
Nancy
L.
Records*
Xuyang Zhang
The
University
of
Iowa
Iowa
City
A
valid
and
reliable
diagnostic
standard
for
language
impairment
is
required
for
the
conduct
of
epidemiologic
research
on
specific
language disorder.
A
rationale
is
provided
for
such
a
diagnostic
system
labeled
the
EpiSLI
system.
This
system
employed five
composite
scores
representing norm-referenced performance
in
three
domains
of
language
(vocabulary,
gram-
mar,
and
narration)
and
two
modalities
(comprehension and
production).
Children
who
have
two
or more
composite
scores
below
-1.25
standard
deviations
were
considered
as
children
with
language
disorder.
The
performance
of
the
EpiSLI
diagnostic
system
was
examined
on
a
sample
of
1,502
kindergarten
children
and
it
was shown
that
this
diagnostic
system yielded
results
that
were
consistent with clinician
rating
and
previous
research results.
KEY WORDS:
specific
language
impairment
(SLI),
diagnosis,
epidemiology, children
This
paper
describes the
development
of
a
system
for
the
diagnosis of
specific
language
impairment
(SLI)
that
has
been
developed
for
use
in a
large
scale
epidemiologic study
of
SLI.
This
diagnostic
system,
which
we
will
refer
to
as
the
EpiSLI
system, was
to
(a)
incorporate
current views
regarding language
impairment
and
SLI,
(b)
provide
for
reliable and
replicable
decisions,
and
(c)
be
grounded,
where
possible,
in
external
evidence
of
language
disability.
Background
Diagnosis
of
SLI
In
recent
years
there
has been
an
increased interest
in
issues
having
to
do
with
the
diagnosis
of
SLI.
Recently,
Aram,
Morris, and
Hall
(1992)
summarized
the criteria
often
used
for
SLI.
One
set
of
criteria
were
those concerned with
exclusionary
conditions
such
as hearing
impairment,
mental
retardation,
and
significant
emotional
disturbance.
These
exclusionary
conditions
separate
forms
of
developmental
lan-
guage impairment
associated
with sensory
and
developmental
disorders
from
SLI
that
occurs without
these associated
conditions.
These
exclusionary
conditions
have
their
origin
in
definitions
of
childhood
aphasia
from
which
the
construct
of
SLI
arose
(Benton, 1964;
Eisenson,
1972)
and,
as
noted by
Aram,
Morris, and
Hall
(1992),
these
conditions
have
received
general
acceptance
in
definitions
of
SLI.
The
second
type of diagnostic
criteria
used
for
SLI
diagnosis
is
concerned
with
the
evaluation
of
a
discrepancy
between
the
child's
achieved language
status
and
some
standard of
expectation
for
the
child's
language
status.
Unlike
the
general
agree-
*Currently
affiliated
with
Pennsylvania State
University,
University
Park
©
1996,
American
Speech-Language-Hearing
Association
0022-4685/96/3906-1284
1284
... Using the B-MAS, 12.7% (21 out of 166) of the children in our study were rated as having DLD. Recall that the 166 children were the low performance group (scored below the 30th percentile) in an earlier screening phase of 1192 pre-kindergartners, so it is not surprising that we identified a higher percentage of children with DLD compared to its prevalence in the general population (7-11%; Norbury et al., 2016, Tomblin et al., 1997. Children with DLD showed statistically lower scores on the majority of the direct/ indirect language measures compared to their TD peers, except for the subordination index in Spanish frog stories and parent's rating of English (see Supplementary Material C for children's scores on the language measures and statistical test results). ...
... Although raters relied primarily on children's responses qualitatively, their ratings aligned with quantitative scores and captured children who had lower scores on these measures in both languages (see Supplementary Material C). However, the differences between groups did not always align with the −1.25 SD standard as suggested in Tomblin et al. (1996Tomblin et al. ( , 1997. Instead of relying on an arbitrary number to make diagnostic decisions, qualitative evaluations of children's responses and error patterns were the key components in the B-MAS, as it was intended as a starting point to establish an identification method for the development of more refined measures in a population that lacks such methods. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose In this validation study, we examined the factor structure of the mediated learning observation (MLO) used during the teaching phase of dynamic assessment. As an indicator of validity, we evaluated whether the MLO factor structure was consistent across children with and without developmental language disorder (DLD). Method Two hundred twenty-four children (188 typically developing and 36 DLD) from kindergarten to second grade completed a 30-min individual mediated learning session on narrative production. Performance during the session was rated using the 12-item MLO by clinicians on affect, behavior, arousal, and elaboration. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to establish the factor structure and reliability of the MLO. Results Factor analysis of the MLO suggested a stable three-factor model with adequate fit indices across kindergarten and school-age samples, across both typically developing and DLD subgroups with good to excellent reliability. The final 11-item MLO (one item was removed due to low factor loading) comprises three subscales including (a) cognitive factor, (b) learning anticipation, and (c) learning engagement. Conclusions The MLO is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing language learning skills in children with and without DLD during dynamic assessment. Practical implications and suggestions for future research addressing the utilization of MLO in dynamic assessment are provided.
... DLD captures a language impairment affecting ≈3.5%-7% of children (Tomblin et al., 1996) and is defined as "persistent difficulties in the acquisition and use of language . . . [when] the difficulties are not attributable to hearing or other sensory impairment, motor dysfunction, or another medical or neurological condition, and are not better explained by intellectual disability or global developmental delay" (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, p. 42). ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Word learning requires the creation of phonological and semantic representations and links in long-term memory. Phonological distance of a given word from the spoken language affects children's lexical–phonological representations and processing. The study investigates the role of the phonological distance of Modern Standard Arabic (StA) words from the child's Spoken Arabic (SpA) vernacular in word learning in Arabic diglossia. It also examines whether, given their vulnerable phonological skills, children with developmental language disorder (DLD) show a stronger impact of phonological distance on word learning than children with typical language development (TLD). Method One hundred children with TLD and DLD in kindergarten and in first grade (25 per group) were tested on comprehension and production word-learning probes manipulating phonological distance. Learning monosyllabic and disyllabic nonwords encoding only SpA phonemes was compared with the learning of parallel nonwords encoding one unique StA consonant each. Results Repeated-measures analyses of variance showed higher word learning scores in children with TLD on both probes and for both syllable lengths. Moreover, all children fared significantly lower, in both comprehension and production probes, when the target stimulus was phonologically distant from the spoken language. Finally, an interaction effect was observed on the production probes, revealing differences in the developmental dynamics of phonological distance effects between the groups: Phonological distance hindered word learning among children with TLD in kindergarten, but among children with DLD in the first grade. Conclusions The results support the role of phonological distance as a phonological complexity factor in word learning in Arabic diglossia. Furthermore, they show that the effect of phonological distance is complex and it interacts with modality, language aptitude, and grade level. The theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.
... For example, Catts et al. (2002) looked at 570 children with four different profiles: oral language difficulties of unknown origin, oral language difficulties with nonverbal intellectual deficits, nonverbal intellectual deficits without oral language difficulties, and typical development. Oral language difficulties (transient for some children, persistent for others) were identified by scores below À1.25 SD on at least two oral language composite scores (Records & Tomblin, 1994;Tomblin et al., 1996). In kindergarten, oral language, early written language, and nonverbal intellectual skills were measured. ...
Article
The current study aimed to fill the gap in research on factors predictive of word reading in French-speaking children with developmental language disorder (DLD) by finding out whether the same predictors of written word recognition evidenced in typically developing children would be retrieved in children with DLD or if some predictors could be specific to children with DLD, especially in the phonological domain. In total, 38 children with DLD and 44 control children were followed from 6 to 8 years in a longitudinal design including two time points: (1) just before explicit reading instruction, where potential predictors of reading were assessed (oral language skills and reading-related skills), and (2) after 2 years of learning to read, where isolated word reading and text reading were assessed in addition to the assessment of oral language skills and reading-related skills. The study mainly showed that the predictors of reading identified in typically developing children are retrieved in children with DLD except for phonemic awareness; the latter result was probably explained by a floor effect. Among the predictors in the phonological domain, phonological instability appeared as a promising predictor of reading irregular words. These results are consistent with the findings of many previous studies and tend to confirm the idea of a strong link between oral phonological skills and written word recognition skills; they also call for attention to specific features in the phonological development of children with DLD when learning to read, particularly phonological instability as a direction for future exploration.
... Inclusion criteria 1. In the included studies, in comparison with the TD children, children with DLD were diagnosed by a speech-language pathologist, with test scores indicating at least 1.25 SDs below the mean on various language tests (Tomblin et al., 1996). 2. There was no remarkable difference between DLD and TD children in their performance on nonverbal intelligence test (Bishop, 2014 ...
Article
Full-text available
Background The purpose of the current study was to assess the differences between children with developmental language disorder (DLD) and typically developing (TD) children in their performance of executive functions from working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility. Methods We performed a systematical search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science for case control studies (published in English between January 1, 1950, and October 11, 2023) comparing the differences in the performance of executive functions between DLD and TD children. Results Forty eligible studies were included in the present study (N = 3,168 participants). In comparison with TD children, DLD children exhibited significantly poorer performances in all six verbal working memory tasks (backward digit recall task, SMD –1.4321, 95% CI –2.2692 to –0.5950; listening recall task, SMD –1.4469, 95% CI –1.7737 to –1.1202; counting recall task, SMD –0.9192, 95% CI –1.4089 to –0.4295; digit recall task, SMD –1.2321, 95% CI –1.4397 to –1.0244; word list recall task, SMD –1.1375, 95% CI –1.5579 to –0.7171; non-word recall task, SMD –1.5355, 95% CI –1.8122 to –1.2589). However, regarding inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility, the differences between DLD and TD children depended on specific circumstances. In subgroup analyses of all verbal working memory tasks, DLD children presented notably lower performance than TD children in both the monolingual English and monolingual non-English groups, and in both the preschooler and school-aged groups. Conclusion This study proves that verbal working memory deficits can be seen as a marker for children with DLD and are not affected by age or language type. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=391070, CRD42023391070.
... Language and communication assessments serve multiple purposes, such as initial screening, diagnosing impairments, identifying intervention areas, making decisions about service delivery, measuring outcomes, and conducting research on underlying cognitive skills and neurobiology (Tomblin et al., 1996). Various assessment approaches and guidelines are utilized to identify language disorders in children, including language sampling, standardized assessments, curriculum-based assessments, and caregivers' and parents' reports (Caesar and Kohler, 2007). ...
Article
Full-text available
Communication disorders in children are multifaceted and often difficult to diagnose accurately due to their complex nature. The Children’s Communication Checklist (CCC) is a widely used diagnostic instrument for identifying and diagnosing children with and without communication disorders. This review aimed to conduct a thematic examination of existing literature that applies the CCC and CCC-2 in the diagnosis of communication disorders. It sought to explore the nuances of CCC’s deployment, its diagnostic traits, and its capability to accurately distinguish individuals with or without communication disorders. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, yielding studies that apply the CCC and CCC-2 in diagnosing communication disorders. The 39 selected studies were subjected to a thematic analysis to identify patterns and themes concerning the use of CCC in diagnosing communication disorders. The review identified seven major themes related to the use of the CCC, such as the evolution and development of the CCC, its application and effectiveness, limitations and strengths, use in specific populations, translation and adaptation, use in different formats, and role in identifying pragmatic language impairments (PLIs). The CCC and CCC-2 have proven invaluable in assessing and diagnosing communication disorders in children. Despite some limitations, their strengths, including their versatility across diverse populations, languages, and contexts, and their ability to identify PLIs, make them effective tools in the field of pediatric communication disorders.
... All three dialects are presented in Figure 1 (in alphabetical order) to reinforce the view that all dialects reflect equivalent, stand alone, and complex linguistic systems. As shown, within each dialectal community, most children develop their linguistic systems rapidly and effortlessly, but a small percentage of children with DLD do not (Norbury et al., 2016;Tomblin et al., 1997). The Disorder within Dialects framework seeks to identify and understand the linguistic strengths and weaknesses of children with DLD using same dialect-speaking, typically developing (TD) peers as the normative reference (Oetting et al., 2016a). ...
Chapter
The volume espouses an ecosystemic standpoint on multilingual acquisition and learning, viewing language development and use as both ontogenesis and phylogenesis. Multilingualism is inclusively used to refer to sociolinguistic diversity and pluralism. Whether speech, writing, gesture, or body movement, language is a conduit that carries meaning within a complex, fluid, and context-dependent framework that engages different aspects of the individual, the communicative interaction, communicative acts, and social parameters. Continually modified over the years to better represent its multidisciplinary scope, the sociobiological notion of language has found steady and productive ground within major theoretical frameworks, which, individually or holistically, contribute to a rounded understanding of language acquisition, learning, and use by exploring both system-internal and system-external factors and their interaction. Summoning the work of leading academics, the volume outlines the changing dynamics of multilingualism in children and adults internationally with the latest advances and under-represented coverage that highlight the ecosystemic nature of multilingual acquisition, learning, and use.
... See a full description of this corpus at https://childes.talkbank.org/access/Clinical-Eng/Gillam.html and in the TNL manual. Diagnosis of children with DLD was made using EpiSLI criteria (Tomblin et al., 1996). The ENNI corpus contains samples from 77 children with DLD and 300 TD peers, ages 4 through 9 years. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Prior work has identified weaknesses in commonly used indices of lexical diversity in spoken language samples, such as type–token ratio (TTR) due to sample size and elicitation variation, we explored whether TTR and other diversity measures, such as number of different words/100 (NDW), vocabulary diversity (VocD), and the moving average TTR would be more sensitive to child age and clinical status (typically developing [TD] or developmental language disorder [DLD]) if samples were obtained from standardized prompts. Method We utilized archival data from the norming samples of the Test of Narrative Language and the Edmonton Narrative Norms Instrument. We examined lexical diversity and other linguistic properties of the samples, from a total of 1,048 children, ages 4–11 years; 798 of these were considered TD, whereas 250 were categorized as having a language learning disorder. Results TTR was the least sensitive to child age or diagnostic group, with good potential to misidentify children with DLD as TD and TD children as having DLD. Growth slopes of NDW were shallow and not very sensitive to diagnostic grouping. The strongest performing measure was VocD. Mean length of utterance, TNW, and verbs/utterance did show both good growth trajectories and ability to distinguish between clinical and typical samples. Conclusions This study, the largest and best controlled to date, re-affirms that TTR should not be used in clinical decision making with children. A second popular measure, NDW, is not measurably stronger in terms of its psychometric properties. Because the most sensitive measure of lexical diversity, VocD, is unlikely to gain popularity because of reliance on computer-assisted analysis, we suggest alternatives for the appraisal of children's expressive vocabulary skill.
... We computed LD or RD status from the appropriate composite using a cutoff of −2/3 (which corresponds to 90 on a standard scale). This criterion is slightly higher than the standard clinical criteria of 85 [46]. However, we do this for research purposes, not a clinical diagnosis. ...
Preprint
Both Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) and Reading Disorder (RD or dyslexia) have been proposed to derive in part from low-level speech perception deficits which may affect downstream language/reading processes. However, DLD and RD are comorbid, raising questions of whether the deficits in one group are driven by the other. Moreover, methodological limits of traditional forced-choice categorizations create uncertainty regarding the nature of the deficits. We examined speech categorization in children with language/reading disabilities, using a visual analog scaling task that overcomes these limits. Participants hear tokens from a speech continuum and indicate the degree of correspondence between the stimulus and each word by selecting a point on a continuous rating scale. Results revealed that children with poor language/reading exhibited similar long-term category structure to their peers with better abilities, but greater trial-to-trial categorization inconsistency. The categorization inconsistency has a unique effect on language/reading abilities, even after controlling for the potential mediating effect of phonological processing on language/reading. Importantly, children with poor reading showed high inconsistency specifically for vowels. These suggest that children’s language/reading abilities are more associated with the consistency of the perceptual processes.
Article
To examine predictors and growth in language for verbal autistic and non‐autistic children with/without low language from 4 to 11 years. Receptive and expressive language trajectories were compared in a community sample of 1026 children at ages 5, 7, and 11 years, across four groups: two autistic groups; one with and one without low language; and two non‐autistic groups; one with and one without low language. Groups were delineated on baseline assessment at 4 years. Non‐autistic and autistic children with low language had lower mean expressive language scores than the non‐autistic typical language group (22.26 and 38.53 units lower, respectively, p < 0.001), yet demonstrated faster language growth across 5 to 11 years ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Both groups without low language had similar mean expressive language scores ( p = 0.864) and a comparable rate of growth ( p = 0.645). Language at 4 years was the only consistent predictor of language at 11 years for autistic children. Results were similar for receptive language in all analyses except there was no significant difference in rate of progress (slope) for the autistic with low language group compared with the typical language group ( p = 0.272). Findings suggest early language ability, rather than a diagnosis of autism, is key to determining language growth and outcomes at 11 years in verbal children. Furthermore, children with low language showed developmental acceleration compared with same age peers.
Article
Introduction: Children with specific language impairment (SLI) have difficulties in different speech and language domains. Electrophysiological studies have documented that auditory processing in children with SLI is atypical and probably caused by delayed and abnormal auditory maturation. During the resting state, or different auditory tasks, children with SLI show low or high beta spectral power, which could be a clinical correlate for investigating brain rhythms. Methods: The aim of this study was to examine the electrophysiological cortical activity of the beta rhythm while listening to words and nonwords in children with SLI in comparison to typical development (TD) children. The participants were 50 children with SLI, aged 4 and 5 years, and 50 age matched TD children. The children were divided into two subgroups according to age: (1) children 4 years of age; (2) children 5 years of age. Results: The older group differed from the younger group in beta auditory processing, with increased values of beta spectral power in the right frontal, temporal, and parietal regions. In addition, children with SLI have higher beta spectral power than TD children in the bilateral temporal regions. Conclusion: Complex beta auditory activation in TD and SLI children indicates the presence of early changes in functional brain connectivity.
Article
Full-text available
The Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Preschool (CELF-P) and the Structured Photographic Expressive Language Test-Preschool (SPELT-P) were administered to 20 children developing normally and 20 children with specific language impairment in order to assess the tests' diagnostic accuracy. For both tests, the group with normal language scored near the mean of the normative group. The group with specific language impairment scored a standard deviation or more below the normal group mean for each test. Discriminant analyses resulted in statistically significant group differences for both tests. In addition, the discriminant analysis resulted in fair to good (80% or better) diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between the subjects with normal language and the subjects with language impairment. However, the cutoff scores that maximized diagnostic accuracy differed greatly between tests. The findings argue against the common clinical practice of applying one cutoff score across tests to identify an impairment. The data illustrate that the use of a predetermined cutoff score inevitably leads to poorer diagnostic accuracy than one that is empirically derived.
Article
Full-text available
Eligibility for speech-language pathology services often is based on the relation between the child’s cognitive ability and language performance. If cognitive ability is developed to a greater degree than language ability, the child is considered to be an appropriate candidate for speech-language pathology services under a cognitive referencing model. If cognition and language are both delayed to a similar degree, the child may be considered an inappropriate candidate for specific language services. The purpose of this study was to examine the agreement of the measurement practices used in the cognitive referencing model of service triage. We administered a battery of cognitive and language measures to 26 preschool children with delayed language ability and examined the agreement of combinations of cognitive-language profiles in determining service eligibility. Substantial disagreement was found among profiles with different measures. Eligibility for service ranged from a high of 22 out of 26 children for the Columbia Mental Maturity Scale (Burgemeister, Blum, & Lorge, 1972)/Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (Dunn & Dunn, 1981) profile, to 3 of 26 children for the McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities General Cognitive Index (McCarthy, 1972)/Test of Auditory Comprehension of Language-Elaborated Sentences (Carrow-Woolfolk, 1985) profile.
Article
Full-text available
The diagnostic decision-making standards used by practicing clinicians to determine language impairment were investigated. Randomly selected ASHA members who worked with children were asked to review hypothetical and real case profiles of children ages 4 to 9:11 (years: months) with language performance skills ranging from slightly above average to substantially below average. Based on the child’s age and language and intelligence test information, clinicians were asked to decide if the child was language impaired (LI) and, if so, to provide a severity rating. Results show significant interrater agreement among the 27 clinicians’ LI decisions (generalized kappa=0.14, p<.0001) and moderate intrarater reliability within clinician’s LI decisions (phi=.68). Most of the clinicians’ diagnostic decision-making standards could be modeled using stepwise logistic regression. These decision rules can provide guidance for those who wish to employ diagnostic standards that reflect those used in clinical practice. Also, these results provide insight into the manner in which clinicians use information for the determination of language impairment.
Article
Full-text available
In a prospective, longitudinal study, 87 language-impaired children were assessed at the ages of 4, 4½, and 5½ years on a battery of language measures. In 37% of children, who were termed the "good outcome group," the language disorder had resolved by the age of 5½ years so that children were indistinguishable from a control group. If one restricted consideration only to those 68 children whose nonverbal ability was within normal limits, the figure rose to 44%. Outcome for individual children (good or poor) could be predicted with 90% accuracy on the basis of test measures obtained at 4 years. The best predictor was ability to tell back a simple story to pictures. The one language measure that did not relate to outcome was phonological competence.
Article
Full-text available
This study investigated the use of a story retelling task as a mechanism for screening integrated communicative performance. Comparisons were made between story retelling performance and performance on two standardized screening tools for kindergarten, readiness, and first-grade children. Results suggest that story retelling is a more stringent measure of integrated communicative performance.
Article
Full-text available
Many popular standardized language tests use a "normal" sample for their normative comparison group. This article describes the errors that result from current uses of such tests; (a) identification of normal children as language impaired, (b) provision of misleading profiles of verbal and nonverbal performance, (c) inability to estimate the severity or describe the general nature of a language impairment, and (d) a gradual increase in the number of children identified as language impaired with progressive test re-normings. Recommendations to alleviate this problem include (a) test users employing only full-range standardized tests; (b) test users using flexible cutoff scores, with the major emphasis on descriptive, criterion-referenced testing, and (c) test makers moving to full-range normative samples with descriptions of what particular test performances indicate in terms of the daily communication functioning of typically achieving children and clinical subgroups of children.
Article
This paper evaluates the evidence bearing on the question of the relationship between brain damage and the condition known as “developmental aphasia.” There is a disposition among some clinicians to deny the real existence of the condition as a specific entity and to consider that when serious language retardation occurs it is always a part-expression of a more pervasive disability, such as mental deficiency, hearing loss, generalized motor disability or psychiatric disorder. However, when all cases of receptive and expressive language retardation that are ascribable to these more general factors are excluded, there still remains a group of children who do not learn to speak and in whom there is no immediately apparent reason for the retardation. In this sense there can be no question that specific developmental aphasia does in fact exist.