ArticlePDF Available

Association between visual reaction time and batting, fielding, and earned run averages among players of the Southern Baseball League

Authors:

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the relationship between vision reaction time (VRT) and batting, fielding, and pitching skill in baseball. A vision screening of 213 professional baseball players in the Southern Baseball League was performed, and the visual reaction times of these players were determined. Official Southern Baseball League statistics were consulted to obtain the players' batting average, fielding average, and earned run average. The mean visual reaction time for all players was 239 msec. There was no significant association between mean VRT and age or race. The mean VRT for dominant eyes was not significantly different from the mean VRT for nondominant eyes. For the 92 players who batted at least 100 times, an association was found between mean VRT and batting average (p = 0.017). For the 168 fielders in the league playing at least 20 games, no statistically significant association was found between mean VRT and fielding average. Similarly, no association was found between mean VRT and earned run average for the B8 pitchers who had participated in more than 20 games. An association was found between visual reaction time and batting skill in baseball. No association was found between visual reaction time and fielding or pitching skill.
BACKGROUND:
METHODS:
RESULTS:
CONCLUSIONS:
J Am Optom Assoc. 1997 Jan;68(1):43-9.
Association between visual reaction time and batting, fielding, and
earned run averages among players of the Southern Baseball
League.
Classé JG , Semes LP, Daum KM, Nowakowski R, Alexander LJ, Wisniewski J, Beisel JA, Mann K, Rutstein R,
Smith M, Bartolucci A.
Abstract
This study was performed to investigate the relationship between vision reaction
time (VRT) and batting, fielding, and pitching skill in baseball.
A vision screening of 213 professional baseball players in the Southern Baseball
League was performed, and the visual reaction times of these players were determined. Official
Southern Baseball League statistics were consulted to obtain the players' batting average, fielding
average, and earned run average.
The mean visual reaction time for all players was 239 msec. There was no significant
association between mean VRT and age or race. The mean VRT for dominant eyes was not
significantly different from the mean VRT for nondominant eyes. For the 92 players who batted at
least 100 times, an association was found between mean VRT and batting average (p = 0.017). For
the 168 fielders in the league playing at least 20 games, no statistically significant association was
found between mean VRT and fielding average. Similarly, no association was found between
mean VRT and earned run average for the B8 pitchers who had participated in more than 20
games.
An association was found between visual reaction time and batting skill in
baseball. No association was found between visual reaction time and fielding or pitching skill.
PMID: 9037989
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Format: Abstract
1
Author information
Publication type, MeSH terms
PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
... Contrary to physical characteristics, less is known regarding cognition and batting performance. Previous works have examined the relationship between visual reaction time (RT) tasks and batting performance (4,6,17). Currently, findings from previous work are mixed on whether improvements in visual RT are associated with in-season and simulated batting performance (4,6,17). ...
... Previous works have examined the relationship between visual reaction time (RT) tasks and batting performance (4,6,17). Currently, findings from previous work are mixed on whether improvements in visual RT are associated with in-season and simulated batting performance (4,6,17). Moreover, researchers have found that concussions result in reduced batting performance due to likely slowed information processing speed (25). ...
Article
Full-text available
International Journal of Exercise Science 16(6): 23-30, 2023. Successful hitting performance may be related to perceptual processing of visual information. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the relationship between preseason cognitive assessments, off-field preseason hitting assessment, and in-game batting performing in collegiate baseball and softball athletes. Collegiate varsity baseball (n = 10, 20.5 ± 1.0 years) and softball (n = 16, 20.3 ± 1.3 years) underwent Flanker Task and Trail Maker Tests A (TMT-A) and B (TMT-B) 24 hours prior to a pre-seasoning indoor hitting assessment. During pre-season hitting assessment, athletes selected 10 underhand pitches and were outfitted with commercially available measurement tools (i.e., HitTrax and The Blast) to quantify swing characteristics. Batting average (BA), slugging percentage (SLUG) and on-base percentage (OBP) was obtained from subsequent 14 non-conference baseball and softball games. The data from this study demonstrated a relationship between the ball's exit velocity (r = .501), bat velocity (r = .524) and average distance traveled (r = .449) during the hitting assessment and in-game BA, p < 0.05. No relationship between hitting assessment outcomes and OBP or SLUG were detected, p > 0.05. Furthermore, the Flanker-Task, TMT-A and TMT-B were not related to in game batting outcomes, p > 0.05. Therefore, these data suggest that off-season preparation should be designed to maximize swing velocity while maintaining performance (i.e., skill) of the coordinated swing.
... [ Downloaded from jrsm.khu.ac.ir on 2024-[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] ...
... In baseball, Classé et al. (1997) determined visual reaction time for 213 athletes and pointed out that there was a strong relationship between visual reaction time and batting efficiency. ...
Article
Full-text available
Stroboscopic training is a form of athletic training during which the individual performs a motor task under intermittently opaque visual conditions. The purpose of this training is to enhance subsequent performance under normal visual conditions as a result of shifting attentional focus within the multisensory integration process. The training performed with the help of this technology that uses specially designed glasses increases the contribution of other somatosensory afferents to motor control by refocusing the individual’s attention on proprioceptive feedback. Other benefits of stroboscopic training include improved short-term visual memory, improved capacity for anticipation as well as increased ability to focus in general but particularly on the central visual field and thus produce coherent movements. The current paper is a meta-analysis of the literature on stroboscopic training and its benefits for professional sport. In sports using stroboscopic (strobe) glasses, for example in hockey, basketball, football, volleyball, baseball or tennis, positive effects on some skills have been identified and training and testing protocols have been described. The aim of this paper is to highlight some practical and methodological benchmarks resulting from the use of stroboscopic training in various sports, and then transfer them to climbing training in order to enhance performance in this sport.
... Similarly, another recent study linked superior visual-motor skills to higher on-base percentage, and lower walk and strikeout rates in professional baseball players (Burris et al., 2018). Other reports have included superior baseball statistical production is correlated with better eye-hand reaction times (Laby et al., 2018), more precise dynamic stereoacuity (Solomon, Zinn, & Vacroux, 1988), and quicker visual reaction and recognition times (Classé et al., 1997;Simons et al., 2016), thereby adding to the evidence that visual skills contribute to batting performance. ...
Article
Full-text available
A growing body of evidence demonstrates visual, perceptual, and oculomotor abilities contribute to batting performance in baseball and there is interest in whether training such abilities can transfer positively to batting performance. The current study tested this question through a pre-registered randomized, and placebo-controlled intervention, conducted with 24 collegiate baseball players at two Division 1 universities. Athletes were randomized to receive either dynamic vision training consisting of stroboscopic, anticipatory timing, and eye quickness drills, or placebo drills stylized after control procedures in previous vision therapy studies. Generalized near-transfer was tested via a digital visual-motor task battery (n = 20), while sports-specific intermediate and far transfer of training were evaluated through instrumented batting practice metrics (n = 14) and box score performance in NCAA-sanctioned games (n = 12), respectively. The effects of training group were tested on these outcome measures while controlling for covariates such as pre-training expectations and site. Participants averaged 8.50 h of training with no significant training group differences in adherence, expectations, or baseline assessments. ANCOVA revealed no group differences in measures of visual-motor skills or NCAA game statistics. However, batting practice demonstrated significant improvements in launch angle (p = 0.002, Cohen’s d = 0.74) and hit distance (p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.70) for the active cohort relative to the placebo control. This controlled and pre-registered pilot study therefore provides preliminary evidence that vision training may improve batting practice performance, creating new opportunities for the transfer of skill training and warranting further study.
Article
Full-text available
Strobe training is a form of cognitive-motor training where the vision is impaired intermittently. The athlete has to use more effectively the limited visual stimuli that he receives or increase the influence from other analyzers. The study was conducted
Chapter
Vision is recognized as an important element of sports performance. Which visual factors are important and how to most effectively assess visual performance is the source of much debate. This chapter presents an evidence-based review of the common visual performance factors assessed in athletes. Updates on commercially available instrumentation to assess various visual performance abilities is presented.
Chapter
Elite athletes frequently demonstrate exceptional abilities to see and respond effectively in sports competition. This chapter reviews the evidence regarding vision and visual information processing factors that contribute to superior sports performance. An information processing model provides a framework for understanding the contributions of the many visual and cognitive factors utilized during sports performance. An application of the information processing model to batting in baseball is provided as a bridge between the theoretic and the practical application. Understanding the vision and visual information processing factors leads to more effective evaluation and enhancement training approaches.
Article
Full-text available
The present study aimed to compare the visual expertise of non-athletes (n ¼ 40; 19-35 years old; age: 22.13 AE 2.37 years) to amateur, non-professional South-African Rugby Union (SARU) first-division club rugby players (n ¼ 40; 19-35 years old; age: 23.88 AE 4.36 years; training age mean: 9.0 AE 1.5 years). Research suggests that athletes have enhanced visio-spatial expertise in comparison to non-athletes. However, conflicting research suggests that this is not always the case as non-athletes possess similar visio-spatial expertise in certain visual skills. Participants underwent an optometric assessment after which the following 6 visio-spatial intelligence (VSI) components were measured; accommodation facility, saccadic eye movement, speed of recognition, peripheral awareness, visual memory and hand-eye coordination using the following tests; hart near far rock, saccadic eye movement, evasion, accumulator, flash memory and ball wall toss tests. Results indicated that first-division rugby players performed significantly better (p 0.05) in five of the six tests performed, except for visual memory (p ¼ 0.893). While this study substantiates the notion that athletes, in this case first-division rugby players, performs significantly better in most VSI components, this is not the case for all, as with visual memory in this study. To more accurately distinguish between athletes and non-athletes, research should move away from tests that focus on basic visual function and develop sport specific testing methods that can be used by a variety of sports.
Article
Full-text available
The issue of whether visually-mediated, simple reaction time (VRT) is faster in elite athletes is contentious. Here, we examined if and how VRT is affected by gaze stability in groups of international cricketers (16 females, 28 males), professional rugby-league players (21 males), and non-sporting controls (20 females, 30 males). VRT was recorded via a button-press response to the sudden appearance of a stimulus (circular target—diameter 0.8°), that was presented centrally, or 7.5° to the left or right of fixation. The incidence and timing of saccades and blinks occurring from 450 ms before stimulus onset to 225 ms after onset were measured to quantify gaze stability. Our results show that (1) cricketers have faster VRT than controls; (2) blinks and, in particular, saccades are associated with slower VRT regardless of the level of sporting ability; (3) elite female cricketers had steadier gaze (fewer saccades and blinks) compared to female controls; (4) when we accounted for the presence of blinks and saccades, our group comparisons of VRT were virtually unchanged. The stability of gaze is not a factor that explains the difference between elite and control groups in VRT. Thus we conclude that better gaze stability cannot explain faster VRT in elite sports players.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.