Separation, termination process and long-term outcome in psychotherapy with severely disturbed patients

Psychosocial Research Centre, Stockholm County Council, Sweden.
Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic (Impact Factor: 0.72). 02/1997; 61(1):16-43.
Source: PubMed


Long-term consequences of working through of intratherapeutic separations were studied in combined psychotherapy and milieu therapy with severely disturbed adult patients. Seven of the 10 cases were consistent with the hypothesis about the significance of therapeutic work with separation for the longitudinal outcome. Inability to mourn was connected with less emotional and functional improvement. Besides the therapist's contribution in the middle phase, the patients' different ways of dealing with the trauma of termination were decisive.

Download full-text


Available from: Andrzej Werbart, Aug 25, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The primary focus in this chapter is on the process of those terminations that arise "as a natural organic outcome of the treatment process itself" (Loewald, 1988, p. 155) in open-ended, psychodynamically oriented therapy. The discussion applies to open-ended therapies in both individual and group formats. These terminations can be contrasted with endings associated with preestablished time limits in brief therapy approaches, terminations characterized as temporary interruptions in the ongoing supportive treatment of more chronic patients, or endings due to extraneous factors. Implications for practice based on the general psychotherapy are generalized to these other therapy approaches in the manner discussed in chapter 2. This chapter is divided into three major sections. The sections follow the late phases of an open-ended therapy. The first section considers issues associated with the ending of the working phase, with a focus on the therapist's preparation for termination. The second section addresses the pretermination phase, the relatively brief period associated with emergence of the termination criteria. The third section considers the termination phase proper. The text of the discussion implies that the boundaries between these phases are distinct. In practice, however, the boundaries will not be as readily evident unless made explicit by the patient or therapist. The exception is the setting of the actual date of the last session that marks the move from the pretermination phase to the termination phase proper. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
    Full-text · Article ·
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The potential for the social worker-client relationship to contribute to therapeutic outcomes is not always apparent with clients who have schizophrenia. Their cognitive impairments often make it difficult for these clients to regulate interpersonal boundaries and for social workers to connect with them. Clinical practice is enhanced, however, by recognizing that severely impaired clients have the capacity and desire for relationships with service providers and others. The manner in which the clinical relationship ends is important for maintaining clinical gains and determining whether the client will risk investing in future relationships. The purpose of this article has been to sensitize social workers to the delicate nature of managing the endings of those relationships.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2001 · Health & social work
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most of the literature on countertransference in clinical social work practice is based on assumptions that the relationship between the client and practitioner is structured and formal. These assumptions do not apply in community-based case management practice, where the social worker and client interact in a variety of settings and circumstances. Additionally, the complex problems of clients who have serious mental illnesses may evoke a range of conscious and unconscious reactions from social workers that must be acknowledged for appropriate intervention to occur. In this paper key principles for the supervisor's recognition and management of countertransference are presented and discussed. Case illustrations are included.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2002 · The Clinical Supervisor
Show more