Content uploaded by Daniel G. Amen
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Daniel G. Amen on Jun 25, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
Annals
of
Clinical
Psychiatry,
Vol.
9, No. 2,
1997
High-Resolution
Brain SPECT Imaging
in
ADHD
Daniel
G.
Amen, M.D.
1,2
and
Blake
D.
Carmichael,
BA.
1
Children
and
adolescents
with
ADHD
were
evaluated
with
high-resolution
brain
SPECT
imaging
to
determine
if
there
were
similarities
between
reported
PET and
QEEG
findings.
Fifty-four
children
and
adolescents
with
ADHD
by
DSM-III-R
and
Conners
Rating
Scale
criteria
were
evaluated.
A
non-ADHD
control
group
was
also
studied
with
SPECT
Two
brain
SPECT
studies
were
done
on
each
group,
a
resting
study
and an
intellectual
stress
study
done
while
participants
were
doing
a
concentration
task.
Sixty-five
percent
of the
ADHD
group
revealed
decreased
perfusion
in the
prefrontal
cortex
with
intellectual
stress, compared
to
only
5% of the
control
group.
These
are
findings
consistent
with
PET and
QEEG
findings.
Of
the
ADHD
group
who did not
show
decreased
perfusion,
two-thirds
had
markedly
de-
creased
activity
in the
prefrontal
cortices
at
rest.
KEY
WORDS: Attention
deficit
hyperactivity
disorder; single-photon emission computed tomography
(SPECT); prefrontal cortex.
INTRODUCTION
Brain
SPECT
(single-photon emission computed
tomography) imaging
is a
nuclear medicine study
which
may
offer
the
most widely available
and
widely
applicable measure
of
neuronal behavior (1).
SPECT
measures cerebral blood
flow
and, indirectly, brain
metabolism (2).
In
studying psychiatric patients with
brain
SPECT
imaging,
researchers
have found
cere-
bral
perfusion patterns
for
many
different
psychiatric
conditions (3). Chiron
et al. (4)
recently reported
normative data
for
children demonstrating that
the
brain
of a 2- to
3-year-old child shows
the
same rela-
tive cerebral blood
flow
pattern
as the
adult brain.
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
(ADHD)
has
been studied with SPECT, PET,
and
QEEG
stud-
ies.
Lou et al.
(5,6) reported
SPECT
hypoperfusion
in
the
regions
of the
prefrontal cortex
and the
basal
ganglia which normalized
with
stimulant medication.
Expected
cortical
areas
failed
to
activate during
a
concentration task. Sieg
et al. (7)
reported
SPECT
findings
in 10
patients
with
the
DSM-III-R diagnosis
of
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
(ADHD),
showing
uptake asymmetries
with
less
activity
in the
left
frontal
and
left
parietal regions
in
comparison
to
control patients. Zametkin
et al. (8)
published
PET
data demonstrating that adults with
ADHD
had
pre-
frontal
cortical deactivation
in
response
to an
intel-
lectual
challenge,
as
opposed
to
increased prefrontal
cortical activity that
was
seen
in
normal
"control"
adults.
The
same
group's
PET
studies
of
children
and
teenagers
with
ADHD,
however, were more equivo-
cal.
Boys
with
ADHD
showed
no PET
differences
from
controls,
while girls
in the
study
had
reduced
global
metabolic activity (9).
Lubar,
who has
performed spectral analysis
of
QEEGs
(quantified computerized EEG)
on
children
and
adolescent
patients with
ADHD,
found that
when
these patients performed
a
concentration task,
such
as
reading
or
copying figures,
there
was an in-
crease
in
frontal lobe theta activity (slow brain wave
activity)
rather
than
the
expected
decrease
in
frontal
lobe slow wave
activity
that
is
found
in
normal con-
trols
(10, 11).
The
above
findings
suggest abnormal activity
in
the
prefrontal cortex
in
ADHD.
Lubar, with
QEEG
spectral analysis,
and
Zametkin,
in the
adult
PET
study,
report that these
difficulties
become more pro-
nounced during
a
concentration
task.
The
more peo-
'The Amen Clinic
for
Behavioral Medicine,
350
Chadbourne
Road, Fairfield,
California
94585.
^To
whom
correspondence should
be
addressed
at The
Amen
Clinic
for
Behavioral Medicine,
350
Chadbourne Road,
Fairfield,
California
94585.
81
1040-1237/97/0600-0081$12.50/1 C
1997 American Academy
of
Clinical
Psychiatrists
82
Amen
and
Carmichael
ple
with
ADHD
try to
concentrate,
it
appears,
the
worse thinking
and
concentrating becomes
for
them.
In
this paper
we
report
our
results
on 54
chil-
dren
and
adolescents
who met the
DSM-III-R crite-
ria
for
ADHD
and
compare them
to 18
children
from
a
psychiatric clinical population
who did not
meet
the
criteria
for
ADHD
or
ADD, residual type.
We
hypothesized that children with
ADHD
would
experience
the
same prefrontal lobe hypoperfusion
with
intellectual challenge
on
brain
SPECT
imaging
as
reported
by
Zametkin with
PET
studies
in
adults
and
Lubar with
QEEG
spectral
analysis
in
children
and
adolescents.
METHOD
We
performed brain
SPECT
imaging
on 54
medication-free children
and
adolescents
from
a
psychiatric
outpatient
clinic
who met the
DSM-III-R
criteria
for
attention
deficit
hyperactivity disorder.
In
addition, each
of
these children
or
adolescents
had a
parent rating score
of
greater than
18 on the
short
form
of the
Conner's Parent-Teacher Rating
Scale.
We
compared this group
to 18
medication-
free
children
and
adolescents
from
a
psychiatric out-
patient clinic population
who did not
meet
the
criteria
for
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
or
attention deficit disorder, residual type,
who had a
score
of
less than
10 on the
Conner's
Parent-
Teacher Rating
Scale,
and who
also
had a
brain
SPECT
study
as
part
of
their clinical workup.
See
Table
1 for age and sex
comparisons. Diagnoses were
made
by a
board-certified child
and
adolescent psy-
chiatrist
(DA) using information
from
clinical inter-
views with
the
children
and the
parents,
the
Conner's
Parent-Teacher
Checklist,
and
Decision-
base,
a
commercially available, structured DSM-III-
R
computerized interview
filled
out by the
parents.
The
ultimate diagnostic decision remained with
the
psychiatrist
utilizing
all of the
data.
Table
1. Age and Sex
Distribution
n
Male
(%)
Age
Mean
Range
ADHD
54
46
(85)
11
6-17
Non-ADHD
18
15
(84)
11
7-18
In
each case,
a
resting
and an
intellectual
stress brain
SPECT
study were performed. During
the
resting phase
the
child
or
adolescent
was
placed
in
a
quiet room
and
intravenous access
was
obtained
via
small-gauge butterfly.
The
patients remained
quiet
for 15 min
with their eyes open
to
allow their
mental state
to
equilibrate
to the
environment.
Ceretec (99m
Tc
hexamethylpropylene amine oxime)
was
then injected.
A
tomographic brain study
was
performed
approximately
60 min
later using
a
Picker
Prism
3000 gamma camera with
fan
beam collima-
tors.
Data were
acquired
in 128 x 128
matrices.
One
hundred twenty images with
3° of
separation span-
ning
360°
of
rotation were obtained.
The
data were
prefiltered using
a
Ramp filter with
a
high
cutoff.
Attenuation correction
was
performed using
a
linear
method. Coronal, sagittal,
and
transaxial
to-
mographs were reconstructed with
a
slice thickness
of
approximately
9 mm. The
transaxial tomographs
were parallel
to the
orbital-meatal line.
The to-
mographs were displayed using
a
standardized color
scale.
The
tomographs obtained were those
of
rela-
tive
blood
flow,
rather than absolute quantification
of
blood
flow.
Relative blood
flow
means blood
flow
in
relationship
to the
brain's
own
activity
(how active
or
inactive brain
areas
are
compared
to the
whole
brain). This
is
standard procedure
in
most
SPECT
labs.
The
tomographs were displayed using
a
stand-
ardized color
scale.
Several days later
the
patient returned
for the
intellectual
stress study. Each patient
was
prepared
in
the
same manner
for
this part
of the
study. How-
ever,
after
the iv was
started
the
patient performed
a
standardized continuous performance task (devel-
oped
by
Conners, distributed
by
MHS).
The
task
was
performed
for 5 min
before
and 10 min
after
the
iso-
tope
was
injected through
the iv. The
scan
was
then
performed
and
processed
as
described above.
The
brain
SPECT
studies were then read
by the
nuclear medicine physician,
who was
blind
to
diag-
nosis.
Listed
in
Tables
2 and 3,
relative
activity
in
each brain area
was
assessed
by
visual inspection
and
assigned
a
qualitative value
on a
scale
of 1+ to 4+
for
overactive areas
and -1 to -4 for
underactive
ar-
eas.
These
readings
are
relative
to
other areas
of the
brain using
the
cerebellum
as the
most active area
of
the
brain.
The
clinical
utility
for
this procedure
is
well
chronicled
by
many other studies
(12-14).
Com-
parisons between
ADHD
and
non-ADHD groups
were made
using
the
Fisher's
exact test. Two-sided/*
values
are
reported.
Brain
SPECT Imaging
in
ADHD
83
Tbble
2.
Comparison
of
Brain
SPECT
Studies
of the
ADHD
Group
vs. the
Non-ADHD
Clinic
Group
at
Rest
3
Prefrontal
decreased
activity
L
R
Frontal
dorsal
focal
activity
L
R
Medial
frontal
lobe
activity
Temporal
lobe
L
R
Parietal
lobe
focal
L
R
Occipital
lobe
L
R
Cerebellum
focal
L
R
Basal
ganglia
diffuse
Basal
ganglia
focal
L
R
Limbic
diffuse
Limbic
focal
L
R
Patchy
cortical
uptake
Dilated
ventricles
ADHD
(%)
(N
= 54)
18
(33)
6(11)
21
(38)
20
(37)
37
(68)
11
(20)
7(13)
12
(22)
10
(19)
0(00)
0(00)
0(00)
0(00)
5(09)
5(09)
5(09)
27
(50)
10
(19)
8(15)
11
(20)
2(04)
Non-ADHD
(%)
(N
= 18)
3(17)
4(22)
2(11)
5(27)
11
(61)
0(00)
2(11)
2(11)
2(11)
0(00)
0(00)
1(05)
1(05)
2(11)
1(05)
0(00)
9(50)
5(28)
1 (05
1
(05)
1
(05)
Two-sided
p
value
0.049
ns
0.049
ns
ns
0.063
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
2
Activity
listed
as
abnormal
was
increased
activity
unless
otherwise
noted.
RESULTS
Tables
2 and 3
present
the
data comparing
the
ADHD group
to the
non-ADHD clinic group
at
rest
and
under intellectual stress.
Of
significance,
65% of
the
children
and
adolescents diagnosed with ADHD
had
significant
prefrontal cortex
hypoperfusion
in re-
sponse
to an
intellectual challenge (Fig.
1),
com-
pared
to
only
5% of
those
clinical
patients
who did
not
have
ADHD
or ADD (p <
0.0001).
Of the 19
ADHD patients (34%)
who did not
suppress their
prefrontal
lobe activity
with
intellectual stress,
12
(63%)
had
decreased
prefrontal
lobe
activity
at
rest,
predominantly
on the
left
side. Focal areas
of in-
creased activity
in the
frontal
lobes, especially
on the
left,
were also noted
in the
ADHD population
at
rest
and
during intellectual stress. This
is
consistent
with
data presented
by
Jaeger (15).
In
addition,
a
higher
percentage
of
increased
activity
was
also noted
in the
temporal
lobes,
again
most notably
on the
left.
DISCUSSION
Prefrontal
lobe
functions
include attention span,
concentration, judgment, activity level, critical think-
ing,
and
impulse
control
(16).
It is not
surprising,
therefore,
to see
that
in a
significant
majority
of the
ADHD cases (87%), there
was
prefrontal lobe
hy-
poperfusion
with
intellectual stress (65%)
or de-
creased
activity
in the
prefrontal cortex
at
rest
(22%).
With
hypoperfusion
in the
prefrontal cortex there
may
be a
loss
of
inhibition normally exerted
by the
frontal
cortex, resulting
in
hyperactive, impulsive,
and
inattentive behaviors.
Temporal
lobe
dysfunction
in a
percentage
of
chil-
dren
and
adolescents
with
ADHD
was a
surprise
to
84
Amen
and
Carmichael
"Table
3.
Comparison
of
Brain
SPECT
Studies
of the
ADHD
Group
vs. the
Non-ADHD
Clinic
Group
During
a
Concentration
Task
0
Prefrontal
intellectual
stress
Increase
No
change
Decrease
Frontal
dorsal
focal
activity
L
R
Medial
frontal
lobe
activity
Temporal
lobe
L
R
Parietal
lobe
focal
L
R
Occipital
lobe
L
R
Cerebellum
focal
L
R
Basal
ganglia
diffuse
Basal
ganglia
focal
L
R
Limbic
diffuse
Limbic
focal
L
R
Patchy
cortical uptake
Dilated
ventricles
ADHD
(%)
(N
= 54)
15
(27)
4(07)
35
(65)
19
(35)
16
(30)
7(12)
11
(20)
7(13)
10
(19)
8(16)
0(00)
0(00)
0(00)
0(00)
7(13)
5(09)
5(09)
20
(38)
7(13)
6(11)
7(13)
0(00)
Non-ADHD
(%)
(N
= 18)
15
(83)
2(11)
1(05)
1(05)
5(27)
3(16)
0(00)
2(11)
2(11)
1(05)
0
(00)
0(00)
1(05)
1(05)
2(11)
3(16)
0
(00)
9(50)
3(16)
2(11)
1(05)
1(05)
Two-sided
p
value
<
0.0001
0.049
ns
ns
0.063
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
"Activity
listed
as
abnormal
was
increased
activity
unless otherwise noted.
us.
However,
there
is a
growing body
of
literature sug-
gesting
a
connection between temporal lobe pathology
and
behavior abnormalities
(17,18).
Trimble (19)
re-
ports
that carbamazepine
is
frequently used
in
Europe
for
the
treatment
of
ADHD.
Silva
et al.
(20) also note
that carbamazepine
has
been
found
effective
in
treat-
ing
the
target
symptoms
of
ADHD
in a
review
of 10
studies,
3
double-blind studies
and 7
open trials.
Some clinicians have reservations about
the use
of
SPECT
in
children, feeling that
it may be
unsafe.
The
radiation exposure
from
SPECT
is
equivalent
to
a
pelvic X-ray (21). Nuclear medicine,
as a
specialty,
has
been doing studies
on
children
for
over
30
years
without
untoward
effects.
There
are
several limitations
to
this study.
The
ADHD
group
was
compared
to
psychiatric controls
as
opposed
to
normal controls. Normal subjects were
not
used
in
this study
due to the
small amounts
of
radiation exposure
for the
procedure. Even though
we
realized that this might cause some methodologi-
cal
concerns,
we
felt
that
the
information gained
us-
ing
a
matched control group would provide
useful
information.
Also,
the
studies were read
by
visual
in-
spection
as
opposed
to
absolute quantitative meas-
ures.
We
felt
that this method
of
reading
the
studies
had
more clinical value (this
is the way
nuclear phy-
sicians read scans),
but it
leaves room
for
physician
bias
and
interpretation,
as
opposed
to
more quanti-
tative
measures. More
research
is
needed
in
both
arenas (visual inspection
and
quantitative measures).
CONCLUSION
In
summary, this study
has
supported
the
find-
ings
of
other researchers regarding decreased pre-
frontal
activity
in
response
to an
intellectual challenge
in
children
and
adolescents
who
have ADHD.
Brain SPECT Imaging
in
ADHD
85
Fig.
1.
Attention deficit
hyperactivity
disorder.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This
study
was
supported,
in
part,
by a
grant
from
Amersham
Medi-Physics.
REFERENCES
1.
Devous
MD Sr:
SPECT
functional
brain imaging.
In:
Kramer
EL,
Sanger
JJ,
eds. Clinical
SPECT
Imaging.
New
York:
Ra-
ven
Press;
1995:97-128
86
Amen
and
Carmichael
2.
Raichle
ME,
Grubb
RL,
Gado
MH:
Correlation between
re-
gional cerebral blood
flow
and
oxidative metabolism. Arch
Neurol 1976;
33:523-526
3.
George,
MS:
Neuroactivation
and
Neuroimaging
with
SPECT.
New
York: Springer-Verlag; 1991
4.
Chiron
C,
Raynaud
C,
Maziere
B:
Changes
in
regional cere-
bral
blood
flow
during brain maturation
in
children
and
ado-
lescents.
J
Nucl
Med
1992;
33:696-703
5. Lou HC,
Henriksen
L,
Bruhn
P:
Focal
cerebral
hypoperfusion
in
children with dysphasia and/or attention
deficit
disorder.
Arch Neurol 1984;
41(8):825-829
6.
Lou HC,
Henriksen
L,
Bruhn
P:
Focal cerebral
dysfunction
in
developmental learning disabilities.
Lancet
1990;
335(8680):8-11
7.
Sieg
KG,
Gaffney
GR,
Preston
DF,
Hellings
JA:
SPECT
brain
imaging abnormalities
in
attention
deficit hyperactivity disor-
der. Clin Nucl
Med
1995;
20(1):55-60
8.
Zametkin
AJ,
Nordahl
TE,
Gross
M:
Cerebral glucose meta-
bolism
in
adults with hyperactivity
of
childhood onset.
N
Engl
J
Med
1990;
323:1361-1366
9.
Ernst
M,
Liebenauer
LL,
King
AC,
Fitzgerald
GA,
Cohen
RM,
Zametkin
AJ:
Reduced
brain metabolism
in
hyperactive
girls.
J Am
Acad Child
Adolesc
Psychiatry 1994;
33(6):858-868
10.
Lubar
JR:
Discourse
on the
development
of EEG
diagnostics
and
biofeedback
for
attention deficit-hyperactivity disorders.
Biofeedback Self-Regul 1991;
16:201-225
11.
Mann
CA,
Lubar
JF,
Zimmerman
AW:
Quantitative analysis
of
EEG in
boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder:
Controlled study with clinical applications. Pediatr Neurol
1992;
8:30-36
12.
O'Tuama
LA,
Treves
ST:
Brain single photon emission com-
puted tomography
for
behavior disorders
in
children. Semin
Nucl
Med
1993;
23:255-263
13.
Ketter
TA,
George
MS,
Ring
HA,
Pazzaglia
P,
Marangell
L,
Kimbrell
TA,
Post
RM:
Primary mood disorders: Structural
and
resting
functional
studies. Psychiat
Ann
1994;
24:637-642
14.
Schuckit
MA,
Jobst
KA,
George
MS, Van
Heertum
RL,
Men-
delson
JH:
Difficult
differential
diagnoses
in
psychiatry:
The
clinical
use of
SPECT.
J
Clin Psychiatry 1995;
56:539-542
15.
Jaeger
T:
Brain
SPECT
imaging
in
child
psychiatry.
Presented
at the
annual meeting
of the
American Psychiatric Associa-
tion,
San
Francisco,
CA,
1993
16.
Luria
AR:
Frontal lobe syndromes.
In:
Vincker
A,
Bruyn
G,
eds. Handbook
of
Clinical Neurology,
Vol 2. New
York:
El-
sevier,
North-Holland;
1969
17.
Blumer
B,
Heilbronn
M,
Himmelhoch
J:
Indications
for
car-
bamazepine
in
mental illness: Atypical psychiatric disorder
or
temporal
lobe syndrome. Compr Psychiatry 1988;
29:108-122
18.
Devinsky
O,
Bear
D:
Varieties
of
aggressive behavior
in
tem-
poral
lobe epilepsy.
Am J
Psychiatry 1984;
141:651-656
19.
Trimble,
M:
Anticonvulsants
in
children
and
adolescents.
J
Child
Adolesc
Psychopharm 1990; 1(2):
107-124
20.
Silva
RR,
Munoz
DM,
Alpert
M:
Carbamazepine
use in
chil-
dren
and
adolescents
with
features
of
attention
deficit
hyper-
activity
disorder:
A
meta-analysis.
J Am
Acad Child Adolesc
Psychiatry
1996;
35:352-358
21.
Reba,
R:
SPECT
and
depression industrial symposia. Pre-
sented
at the
annual
meeting
of the
American Psychiatric
As-
sociation,
San
Francisco,
CA,
1993.