Designing and developing a new high dependency unit. Here's one I prepared earlier....

Victoria Hospital, Blackpool.
Nursing in Critical Care (Impact Factor: 0.65). 07/1996; 1(4):198-201.
Source: PubMed


A new high dependency unit is established for postoperative cardiac patients, from design to implementation Facilities were incorporated within financial, time and space constraints. Layout and use of space was determined for optimal working conditions and care of the patient. The choice of equipment was a vital part of the high dependency unit. The crucial role of nurses in this project is emphasised.

5 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Spatial requirements for clinical tasks have been recommended from many sources over the past 15 years, but little empiric evidence is offered to support recommendations. This article describes a series of functional space experiments using clinical scenarios to test the spatial requirements for a bed space in a critical care setting. The analysis found that an average of 23.26 m(2) was needed for a bed-to-bed transfer followed by 22.87 m(2) for a resuscitation task. The overall average space requirement for the three tasks for a patient and caregiver zone (ergonomic envelope) was 22.83 m(2), excluding family and hygiene zones and in-room storage.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2007 · Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Technology developments in neonatal intensive care units have increased the spatial requirements for clinical activities. Because the effectiveness of healthcare delivery is determined in part by the design of the physical environment and the spatial organization of work, it is appropriate to apply an evidence-based approach to architectural design. This study aimed to provide empirical evidence of the spatial requirements for an individual cot or incubator space. Observational data from 2 simulation exercises were combined with an expert review to produce a final recommendation. A validated 5-step protocol was used to collect data. Step 1 defined the clinical specialty and space. In step 2, data were collected with 28 staff members and 15 neonates to produce a simulation scenario representing the frequent and safety-critical activities. In step 3, 21 staff members participated in functional space experiments to determine the average spatial requirements. Step 4 incorporated additional data (eg, storage and circulation) to produce a spatial recommendation. Finally, the recommendation was reviewed in step 5 by a national expert clinical panel to consider alternative layouts and technology. The average space requirement for an individual neonatal intensive care unit cot (incubator) space was 13.5 m2 (or 145.3 ft2). The circulation and storage space requirements added in step 4 increased this to 18.46 m2 (or 198.7 ft2). The expert panel reviewed the recommendation and agreed that the average individual cot space (13.5 m2/[or 145.3 ft2]) would accommodate variance in working practices. Care needs to be taken when extrapolating this recommendation to multiple cot areas to maintain the minimum spatial requirement.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2010 · The Journal of perinatal & neonatal nursing
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper describes two case studies using a 5-step protocol to determine functional space requirements for cardiac and neonatal intensive care clinical activities. Functional space experiments were conducted to determine the spatial requirements (defined as the minimumsized rectangle to encompass the Link Analysis). The data were collected with multi-directional filming and analysed frame-by-frame to plot the movements between the nurses and other components in the space. The average clinical functional space for the adult critical care unit was 22.83m2 (excluding family and hygiene space and in-room storage). The average functional clinical space for neonatal intensive care unit was 13.5m2 (excluding circulation and storage). The use of the 5-step protocol is reviewed, with limitations in case study 1 addressed in case study 2. The findings from both case studies have been incorporated into government guidance and achieved knowledge transfer by being implemented in building design. Published
    No preview · Article · Sep 2010 · Journal of Healthcare Engineering