Facilitating Treatment Entry among Out-of-Treatment Injection Drug Users

Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, United States
Public Health Reports (Impact Factor: 1.55). 07/1998; 113 Suppl 1:116-28.
Source: PubMed


High risk injection practices are common among injecting drug users (IDUs), even following intervention efforts. Moreover, relapse to risk behaviors has been reported among those who initiate risk reduction. Substance abuse treatment offers the potential to reduce or eliminate injecting risk behaviors through drug cessation. We report on the effectiveness of two intervention strategies in facilitating treatment entry among out-of-treatment IDUs: motivational interviewing (MI), and intervention developed to help individuals resolve their ambivalence about behavior change, and free treatment for 90 days. These conditions were compared with an intervention focusing on a hierarchy of safer injecting practice, referred to here as risk reduction (RR), and no free treatment.
Nearly 200 out-of-treatment IDUs were randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions: MI/free treatment, MI/no free treatment, RR/free treatment, and RR/no free treatment. Regardless of assignment, we assisted anyone desiring treatment by calling to schedule the appointment, providing transportation, and waiving the intake fee.
Overall, 42% of study participants entered treatment. No significant differences were found between MI and RR; however, 52% of those assigned free treatment entered compare with 32% for those who had to pay. Other predictors of treatment entry included prior treatment experiences, perceived chance of contracting acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) greater than 50%, "determination" stage of change, greater frequency of heroin injecting, and fewer drug-using friends.
These findings support the importance of removing barriers to treatment entry.

Download full-text


Available from: Robert E Booth
  • Source
    • "A study of 2,265 persons in 11 U.S. cities revealed that indicators of motivation, in particular readiness for drug treatment, predicted treatment engagement and retention (Joe et al., 1998). Another study found that the stage of change in readiness for cessation of drug use was predictive of treatment entry (Booth et al., 1998). Drug relapse and treatment failures were found to be related to lack of motivation to change (Belding et al., 1995; Joe et al., 1998; Longshore and Teruya, 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study applied a stage-of-change model to examine the motivational profiles of clients seeking methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) in China. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with a total of 179 clients from six MMT clinics. The University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA) scale was used to measure the participants' motivation and readiness to change. Cluster analysis was performed to classify the sample into subgroups with respect to their change dimensions. The study sample was allocated into five distinct clusters: uninvolved, denial, pre-participation, ambivalent, and participation. Participants who were classified in the denial cluster were older than those in the pre-participation and participation clusters. A higher level of motivation to change was positively associated with continued heroin use and more severe drug problems. It would be beneficial to evaluate motivational profiles of individual clients in the treatment planning process and provide tailored interventions for sustained treatment retention and outcomes.
    Full-text · Article · May 2011 · Drug and alcohol dependence
  • Source
    • "Consistent with theories and research on enabling factors, those without health insurance were less likely to attend an intervention. The uninsured are more likely to have both external (unavailability) and internal (lack of knowledge of available options) barriers to SUD treatment (Aday and Andersen, 1974; Andersen, 1995; Booth et al., 1998; Wells et al., 2001; Wu et al., 2003; Wu and Ringwalt, 2005). Findings also revealed that those who were younger, employed, and/or married were less likely to attend an intervention. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The emergency department (ED) visit provides a window of opportunity for screening and linkage to services for inner-city adults with substance-use disorders (SUDs). This article examines predictors of intervention attendance among ED patients who screen positive for an SUD (alcohol or other drug). As part of a large randomized control trial, medical and injured patients (ages 19-60) in an inner-city ED completed a computerized screening survey. Based on random assignment, those screening positive for an SUD either were scheduled to attend a post-discharge intervention or received a referral brochure. Interventions (brief motivational intervention vs. case management intervention) focused on linking participants to substance-use treatment. Independent variables assessed included demographics, ED visit reason, health functioning, readiness to change, self-efficacy, and substance use. Intervention attendance (yes/no) was the dependent variable. Overall, 957 (62.3% male; 58.3% African-American; M(age) = 33.2 years) were randomized to interventions (brief motivational intervention/case management intervention) and are the focus of subsequent analyses. There were no differences in the pattern of predictors of intervention attendance for brief motivational intervention versus case management intervention. Bivariate analyses compared those who attended the post-ED intervention with those who did not attend. Participants who attended the intervention (50%) were significantly more likely to be older, unmarried, insured, unemployed, and in the "action" stage of change. The present findings highlight the relative importance of assessing and attending to readiness to change as well as demographic factors such as insurance and employment (and potentially associated barriers) in ED-based screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment protocols.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2010 · Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs
  • Source
    • "This highlights the importance of changing drug abusers' social networks and the way that people spend their social/leisure time if they wish to recover from drug abuse. Other researchers have noted the importance of doing this (Edelen et al. 2007; Bond, Kaskutas & Weisner 2003; Booth et al. 1998). Our multivariate analysis also showed that two specific properties of the Ecstasy use experience were associated with greater involvement in effects-enhancing behaviors: using Ecstasy for its touch-enhancing qualities and enjoying the combined music-and-Ecstasy-use experience. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examines drug effect-enhancing behaviors practiced by young adult users of the drug, Ecstasy. Between August 2002 and August 2004, 283 face-to-face interviews were conducted with active Ecstasy users. Study participants were recruited in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area using a targeted sampling approach. The large majority of study participants (87%) engaged in at least one behavior specifically designed to bolster the effects of their Ecstasy use, with 61% of the study participants reporting having engaged in at least three such behaviors during the past 30 days. Taking steps to boost one's Ecstasy-related high was associated with binging on Ecstasy and a variety of adverse outcomes, such as experiencing a greater number of negative consequences resulting from Ecstasy use and experiencing more Ecstasy-related drug dependency symptoms. Multivariate analysis revealed several factors associated with greater involvement in effects-boosting behaviors, including race (not being African American), spending time with other drug users, using Ecstasy for its touch-enhancing qualities, enjoyment of the music-and-Ecstasy-use experience, and childhood maltreatment experiences. The implications of these findings for treatment, prevention, and intervention for drug problems among Ecstasy users are discussed.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2009 · Journal of psychoactive drugs
Show more