No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Commissioning of a Micro-Multileaf Collimator for Conformal Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Radiotherapy
... Voraussetzung ist, neben einer besonders hohen Genauigkeit des Bestrahlungsgerätes, eine präzise und reproduzierbare Lagerung des Patienten [Lutz 1988]. Dazu dient ein stereotaktisches Lokalisierungssystem, welches bei einer einmaligen Bestrahlung aus einem Grundring und einem Insbesondere Risikostrukturen mit hoher Radiosensitivität werden geschont [Emami 1991, Lo 1996 [Cosgrove 1999, Wurm 1999. Auch andere gutartige Erkrankungen wie beispielsweise Gefäßfehlbildungen (AVM) lassen sich zum Teil mit großem Erfolg stereotaktisch behandeln. ...
... Je größer dieser Wert ist, desto steiler fällt die Dosis außerhalb des Zielgebietes ab und schont so gesundes Gewebe. Das Verhältnis sollte also möglichst groß sein und zwischen 0,2 und 0,3 liegen [Wurm 1999]. ...
Stereotaktische Strahlenchirurgie und -therapie (SRS/SRT) weisen sich durch sehr konformale und hochpräzise Dosisverteilungen aus. Im Kopfbereich ist SRS/SRT eine etablierte Behandlungsmethode. Um diese Technik in anderen Körperregionen anwenden zu können, wurden verschiedene Positionierungs- und Fixierungsmethoden, sowie der Einsatz von 9 verschiedene Bestrahlungstechniken untersucht. Es wurde auch die Genauigkeit von 2 Dosisalgorithmen evaluiert. Jeweils eine thermoplastische Maske für den Kopf- und den Kopf-Hals-Bereich, sowie ein Doppelvakuumsystem für extrakraniale Regionen wurden untersucht. Die Kopfmaske erreichte im Durchschnitt eine Genauigkeit von 1,8mm (Fehler 0,9mm), mit einem Oberkiefersupport auf 0,96mm +/- 0,25mm. Die Kopf-Hals-Maske zeigte mit 0,7mm +/- 0,4mm, dass ihre Verwendung in der SRS/SRT möglich ist. Für die Genauigkeit des Doppelvakuums wurde durchschnittlich 7,0mm +/-3,5mm ermittelt. Relativ zum Vakuumkissen wurde eine Genauigkeit von 1,6mm +/- 1,87mm gemessen. Evaluierungsmethoden waren IR-Marker, die mittels Zahnabdruck am Patienten fixiert wurden und fusionierte Wiederholungs-CTs, in denen die Verschiebung von Landmarken am Positionierungssystem und im Patienten vermessen wurden. Bei den Bestrahlungstechniken sind 3 Techniken durch gute Ergebnisse aufgefallen. Stehfeldtechnik, dynamischer Arc und IMRT zeigten mit einem 3mm-mMLC hohe Konformität und Homogenität auf. Die ersten beiden Techniken erreichten steile Dosisgradienten, wohingegen die IMRT bei komplexen Zielgebieten und nahen Risikostrukturen auffiel und immer die geforderte 90%-Umschließende erreichte. Die Verifizierung der Dosisalgorithmen erfolgte anhand von Filmen. 8 Pläne wurden jeweils auf einem Film in Isozentrumsebene abgebildet und ein Vergleich mit der berechneten Dosis von Clarkson- und Pencil-Beam-Algorithmus mit Hilfe der Gamma-Evaluation durchgeführt. Beide Algorithmen sind für die SRS/SRT geeignet, der Pencil-Beam-Algorithmus zusätzlich für die IMRT verwendbar.
... Five cases involved PTV within 5 mm of the optic chiasm. All plans were generated using 6 MV photons and m3 micro-multileaf collimation 15 (Brainlab AG). ...
This investigation focuses on possible dosimetric and efficiency advantages of HybridArc-a novel treatment planning approach combining optimized dynamic arcs with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) beams. Application of this technique to two disparate sites, complex cranial tumors, and prostate was examined. HybridArc plans were compared with either dynamic conformal arc (DCA) or IMRT plans to determine whether HybridArc offers a synergy through combination of these 2 techniques. Plans were compared with regard to target volume dose conformity, target volume dose homogeneity, sparing of proximal organs at risk, normal tissue sparing, and monitor unit (MU) efficiency. For cranial cases, HybridArc produced significantly improved dose conformity compared with both DCA and IMRT but did not improve sparing of the brainstem or optic chiasm. For prostate cases, conformity was improved compared with DCA but not IMRT. Compared with IMRT, the dose homogeneity in the planning target volume was improved, and the maximum doses received by the bladder and rectum were reduced. Both arc-based techniques distribute peripheral dose over larger volumes of normal tissue compared with IMRT, whereas HybridArc involved slightly greater volumes of normal tissues compared with DCA. Compared with IMRT, cranial cases required 38% more MUs, whereas for prostate cases, MUs were reduced by 7%. For cranial cases, HybridArc improves dose conformity to the target. For prostate cases, dose conformity and homogeneity are improved compared with DCA and IMRT, respectively. Compared with IMRT, whether required MUs increase or decrease with HybridArc was site-dependent.
... If point P is blocked by MLC, the transmission factor measured for BrainLab mMLC is applied. 10 When point P is located in between two leafs, Tϭ3% due to the tongue and groove transmission. Otherwise, Tϭ1%. ...
In clinical radiation physics chart checking, the dose calculation results generated by computer treatment planning software are usually verified by an independent computerized monitor unit calculation routine, or by “hand calculation” using percent depth dose (PDD), tissue phantom ratio (TPR), scatter factors, and the machine calibration factors. For intensity‐modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) or intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the “hand calculation” becomes not feasible due to the sophisticated multileaf collimator (MLC) segments created for intensity‐modulated dose delivery. Therefore, an independent computerized dose calculation routine is needed for fast and reliable dose verification. In this work, a point dose calculation routine for IMRS/IMRT plan verification is developed by directly applying Clarkson's method. The method includes preparing data table by measuring TPRs for circular fields with diameters ranging 6 to 98 mm, extrapolating TPR for the zero field size (TPR0) from measured data and generating scatter phantom ratio (SPR) for each individual circular field. The segmented MLC sequences created by IMRS/IMRT inverse planning are converted into irregular fields for Clarkson's calculation. This method has been tested using 29 IMRS/IMRT cases. The results indicate that it is reliable, fast, and accurate. The average time to calculate one field is about 2 s with a 300 Mhz CPU.
... The Novalis Ò System consists of a single energy (6 MV photons) linear accelerator (linac) with an integrated mini multi-leaf collimator (MLC) [2,22], dedicated for shaped beam surgery [6]. The linac is part of an integrated system, combined with a TPS and a patient positioning and target localization system. ...
The purpose of this study is to assess retrospectively secondary patient motion induced by 6D patient setup correction.
For 104 patients, treated with Novalis, 6D setup correction prior to treatment was performed by ExacTrac5.0/NovalisBody in combination with the Robotic Tilt Module mounted underneath the Exact Couch top. This 6D correction might induce additional setup errors due to patient reaction against the rotations. To evaluate induced secondary motion, the 6D setup correction is verified and evaluated with respect to the tolerance limits.
The majority of measured secondary motions are found within the tolerance limits. Detected secondary motions are mostly found in longitudinal shifts and lateral rotations, and mainly found in only 1 dimension during the same verification. The verifications indicate that the patient population can be divided into a group that hardly moves and a group that moves throughout all 6D setup corrections. The patient's behavior can be predicted by the evaluation of the first five fractions as none of the patients demonstrate a learning curve during the treatment.
6D setup correction does not induce secondary motion for the majority of the patients and can therefore be applied for all treatment indications.
Purpose: To assess hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (H-SRT) with concurrent topotecan in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Methods and Materials: Between February 1998 and December 2001, 25 patients with recurrent malignant glioma were treated in a phase I-H study (8 females and 17 males; median age, 45 years; range, 11-66 years; median Karnofsky performance status, 80%, range, 50-100%; median Mini Mental Standard Examination score, 25 points; range, 10-30 points). Of the 25 patients, 20% had World Health Organization Grade III and 80% World Health Organization Grade IV glioma. All patients had been treated previously by external beam radiotherapy with 54.4 Gy in 34 fractions twice daily, at least 6 h apart, within 3.5 weeks or 60 Gy in 30 fractions within 6 weeks. In addition, 84% had already received at least one chemotherapy regimen for recurrence. The median H-SRT dose at the 80% isodose was 25 Gy, and the maximal dose was 30 Gy delivered in five to six fractions on consecutive days. Topotecan (1.1 mg/m(2)/d) was given as a continuous i.v. infusion during H-SRT. Depending on the toxicity and compliance, patients received an additional 48 topotecan courses. Results: For all patients, the actuarial median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (range, 1.4-47.8 months), the median functional survival was 12.6 months (range, 1.6-49.5 months), and the median overall survival was 14.5 months (range, 3-56.4 months). Twelve percent of patients developed presumed adverse radiation effects (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 2). According to the Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2.0, no topotecan-related Grade 4 toxicity was noted. Grade 3 neutropenia was documented after 14 and Grade 3 thrombopenia. after 12 courses. Conclusion: H-SRT with topotecan is feasible and well-tolerated in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma and results in similar survival compared with other repeat treatment modalities. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc.
Conformal stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy using a linear accelerator and a micromultileaf collimator (mMLC) offer the possibility of irradiating irregularly shaped target volumes. Dynamic arc radiosurgery and radiotherapy, i.e., stereotactic radiation therapy combining a moving gantry with a dynamic mMLC, enable the radiation even of lesions with concave structures.
The dynamic arc method requires additional tools for quality assurance (QA) and three-dimensional verification at a high spatial resolution. A QA program was developed. Dose distributions of planning target volumes with concavities were investigated in polymer gel phantoms. The radiation-induced change of the relaxation rate R(2) was measured by magnetic resonance imaging. The distributions were compared with image processing tools.
Using the therapy-planning software BrainSCAN 4.0 (and 4.1 beta) in combination with the mMLC m3, deviations between the planned and measured 90% isodoses of about 2 mm were registered in the isocenter plane. Three-dimensional verification was feasible in the range of accuracy achieved in planning and dose measurement.
Dynamic arc radiosurgery and radiotherapy offer excellent conformation even for complicated planning target volumes with concavities. The dose distribution calculated with the treatment-planning software used can be accomplished with the available equipment. Patients can be treated by dynamic arc radiosurgery and radiotherapy.
Advances in field-shaping techniques for stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy have allowed dynamic adjustment of field shape with gantry rotation (dynamic conformal arc) in an effort to minimize dose to critical structures. Recent work evaluated the potential for increased sparing of dose to normal tissues when the primary collimator setting is optimized to only the size necessary to cover the largest shape of the dynamic micro multi leaf field. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is now a treatment option for patients receiving stereotactic radiotherapy treatments. This multisegmentation of the dose delivered through multiple fixed treatment fields provides for delivery of uniform dose to the tumor volume while allowing sparing of critical structures, particularly for patients whose tumor volumes are less suited for rotational treatment. For these segmented fields, the total number of monitor units (MUs) delivered may be much greater than the number of MUs required if dose delivery occurred through an unmodulated treatment field. As a result, undesired dose delivered, as leakage through the leaves to tissues outside the area of interest, will be proportionally increased. This work will evaluate the role of optimization of the primary collimator setting for these IMRT treatment fields, and compare these results to treatment fields where the primary collimator settings have not been optimized.
To evaluate dose conformity and mean target dose in light of previous comparative studies and state-of-the-art radiosurgery delivery modalities.
Seven patients with acoustic neuromas deemed clinically suitable for linear accelerator or Gamma Knife radiosurgery were planned such that the minimum doses for any plan were equal. Gamma Knife plans were prepared in three ways: by altering the prescription of previously published data, by hand and with the assistance of an automatic planning algorithm (wizard). The linear accelerator plans were prepared utilizing a micro-multileaf collimator in both static and dynamic modes. The dose volume histogram analyses lead to a measure of conformity and the mean and minimum target dose for each plan. Statistical significance was calculated as each planning modality was compared with every other.
All Gamma Knife plans demonstrated a statistically significantly better conformity when compared with fixed field linear accelerator techniques. When compared to linear accelerator techniques the wizard-assisted Gamma Knife plans demonstrated significantly better conformity. The mean target dose for all the Gamma Knife plans was significantly higher than that of the linear accelerator plans (19.2 Gy vs. 13.4 Gy).
Conformity of the prescription isodose to the target shape is of major importance in radiosurgery. The modalities compared represent commercially available and widely accepted systems. Gamma Knife plans derived using the 'wizard' option and finalized by hand yield the best conformity.
To evaluate our initial experience with image guided respiratory gated H-SBRT for liver and lung tumors. The system combines a stereoscopic x-ray imaging system (ExacTrac X-Ray 6D) with a dedicated conformal stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy linear accelerator (Novalis) and ExacTrac Adaptive Gating for dynamic adaptive treatment. Moving targets are located and tracked by x-ray imaging of implanted fiducial markers defined in the treatment planning computed tomography (CT). The marker position is compared with the position in verification stereoscopic x-ray images, using fully automated marker detection software. The required shift for a correct, gated set-up is calculated and automatically applied. We present our acceptance testing and initial experience in patients with liver and lung tumors. For treatment planning CT and Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) taken at free breathing and expiration breath hold with internal and external fiducials present were used. Patients were treated with 8-11 consecutive fractions to a dose of 74.8-79.2 Gy. Phantom tests demonstrated targeting accuracy with a moving target to within +/-1 mm. Inter- and intrafractional patient set-up displacements, as corrected by the gated set-up and not detectable by a conventional set-up, were up to 30 mm. Verification imaging to determine target location during treatment showed an average marker position deviation from the expected position of up to 4 mm on real patients. This initial evaluation shows the accuracy of the system and feasibility of image guided real-time respiratory gated H-SBRT for liver and lung tumors.
To evaluate our initial experience with Novalis (BrainLAB, Heimstetten, Germany) frameless image-guided noninvasive radiosurgery.
The system combines the dedicated Novalis linear accelerator with ExacTrac X-Ray 6D, an infrared camera and a kilovolt stereoscopic x-ray imaging system, a noninvasive mask system, and ExacTrac robotics for patient positioning in six degrees of freedom. Reference cranial skeletal structures are radiographically imaged and automatically fused to digital reconstructed radiographs calculated from the treatment planning computed tomographic scan to find the target position and accomplish automatic real-time tracking before and during radiosurgery. We present the acceptance testing and initial experience in 15 patients with 19 intracranial lesions treated between December 2005 and June 2006 at the Charité by frameless image-guided radiosurgery with doses between 12 and 20 Gy prescribed to the target-encompassing isodose.
Phantom tests showed an overall system accuracy of 1.04 +/- 0.47 mm, with an average in-plane deviation of 0.02 +/- 0.96 mm for the x-axis and 0.02 +/- 0.70 mm for the y-axis. After infrared-guided patient setup of all patients, the overall average translational deviation determined by stereoscopic x-ray verification was 1.5 +/- 1.3 mm, and the overall average rotational deviation was 1.0 +/- 0.8 degree. The data used for radiosurgery, after stereoscopic x-ray verification and correction, demonstrated an overall average setup error of 0.31 +/- 0.26 mm for translation and 0.26 +/- 0.23 degree for rotation.
This initial evaluation demonstrates the system accuracy and feasibility of Novalis image-guided noninvasive radiosurgery for intracranial benign and malignant lesions.
Developments and Controversies in Three-Dimensional Treatment Planning Methods to Create a Two-Dimensional Modulation of Fluence (Intensity) across a Radiation Field Megavoltage Portal Imaging, Transit Dosimetry, and Tissue Compensators The Multileaf Collimator in Clinical Practice Converting Three-Dimensional Dose to Biological Outcomes TCP and NTCP Progress in Proton Radiotherapy Image Formation, Utilization, Display, the Role of Three-Dimensional, and the CT-Simulator
3rd Ed Bibliogr. na konci kapitol
An integrated system for fractionated, stereotactically guided conformation radiotherapy has been developed. The system components are a stereotactic fixation system that can be used each treatment day, a localization, and positioning unit that can be used during x-ray computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, and radiographical examinations as well as for treatment. Conformal precision radiotherapy is planned with a new three-dimensional treatment planning system (Voxel-Plan-Heidelberg) which comprises, among others options, a three-dimensional image correlation procedure as well as routines for the calculation of coplanar and non-coplanar irradiations with irregularly shaped fields. Two different multi-leaf collimators have been designed for precision radiotherapy in the head and neck region. A manual multi-leaf collimator is used for irradiations with stationary beams or for moving beam treatments with invariable irregularly shaped fields. This collimator system is now being used for patient treatments. The design of a computer controlled multi-leaf collimator unit for multiple fixed field irradiation techniques is discussed. All system components are aimed at conforming dose distributions for fractionated radiotherapy treatments to the target to improve sparing of adjacent normal tissues, and at achieving a sufficient geometrical accuracy in the dose application.
Various aspects of multileaf collimator (MLC) design are examined relative to clinical requirements. The characteristics studied included: (a) irregular field edge definition or "effective" penumbra, (b) optimum field coverage for the multileaf portion of the field, and (c) leaf velocity. A film dosimetry technique was developed to measure the rapid 2-dimensional change in dose at an edge defined by a multileaf collimator with the segments staggered. The method applies a correction factor which allows for the changing ratio of scattered to primary photons at the field edge so that the energy dependence of the film is corrected. Stepped lead alloy blocks were irradiated with 6 MV photons to obtain films simulating a double-focused multileaf collimator, and the results were compared to films of fields shaped with standard divergent blocks. The effect of the shape of the leaf face (the end of the leaf) on penumbra was also studied. Proper shaping of the leaf ends may eliminate the need to exactly match beam divergence so that the mechanical of the collimator system is simplified. Leaves having several different end shapes and moving horizontally to intercept a vertical beam were compared to the divergent design where a straight face moves along an arc. The measurements showed that the "effective" penumbra (measured as the distance from the 80 to 20% isodose lines) for the multileaf collimator is a function of the angle between the direction of leaf motion and the edge defined by the leaves. In addition, all leaf end shapes showed some increase in penumbra compared to standard divergent blocking and also had increasing penumbra width as they moved over or back from the field center line. A total of 459 treatment fields and six disease sites were examined to determine the percentage of fields potentially shaped by multileaf segments of specified length. This study showed 93% of the fields had lengths of 30 cm or less and 99% had widths of 25 cm or less. A study conducted to determine the required leaf velocity to shape various target volume configurations during complete rotation (at 1 RPM) showed that a leaf speed of at least 1.5 cm/sec at isocenter is needed for dynamic conformal treatment.
Stereotactic radiosurgery of the brain may be accomplished with a linear accelerator by performing several noncoplanar arcs of a highly collimated beam focused at a point. The shape of the radiation distribution produced by this technique is affected by the beam energy, field size, and the number and size of the arcs. The influence of these parameters on the resulting radiation distributions was analyzed by computing dose volume histograms for a typical brain. Dose volume functions were computed for: (a) the energy range of 4-24 MV x rays; (b) target sizes of 1-4 cm; and (c) 1-11 arcs and dynamic rotation. The dose volume histograms were found to be dependent on the number of arcs for target sizes of 1-4 cm. However, these differences were minimal for techniques with 4 arcs or more. The influence of beam energy on the dose volume histogram was also found to be minimal.
Between 5/21/86 and 11/1/89, we treated 64 recurrent or inoperable intracranial tumors in 60 patients (40 primary, 24 metastatic) with stereotactic radiosurgery using a modified 6 MeV linear accelerator at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy. Patients were followed until death or 1/1/90. The median follow-up was 8 months (2-43 months). Fourteen patients experienced complications from 12 hours to 7 months (median 3 months, but only two patients more than 4 months) following radiosurgery. To determine variables related to complication, we calculated integral dose-volume histograms for 61/64 lesions and the surrounding CT-defined normal tissue. We excluded 16 lesions in 15 patients for follow-up less than 4 months (12 patients) or insufficient treatment information (3 patients). The variables for which higher values were associated with significantly more toxicity in a univariate score test were: a) tumor dose inhomogeneity (p less than 0.00001), b) maximum tumor dose (p = 0.00002), c) number of isocenters (p = 0.00002), d) maximum normal tissue dose (p = 0.00005) and e) tumor volume (p = 0.0001). These variables were all highly correlated with tumor dose inhomogeneity (coefficients of rank correlation 0.75-0.81). Tumor dose inhomogeneity had a much higher loglikelihood in a logistic model than any other single variable and a higher loglikelihood than any other two variables combined. None of the 21 patients with metastatic lesions experienced a complication. When we excluded the metastatic lesions, the above five variables remained significant in univariate tests. The mean tumor dose, number of treatment arcs, total degrees of arc, tumor location, previous radiotherapy, tumor geometry, pretreatment performance status, collimator size, and age were not significantly associated with toxicity. We conclude that radiosurgery of intracranial tumors is associated with a low risk of complications for lesions less than 10cc treated with a single isocenter to maximum tumor doses less than 25 Gy with tumor dose inhomogeneity less than 10 Gy, but that treatment of larger lesions will require new treatment strategies which reduce the tumor dose inhomogeneity associated with multiple isocenter treatments.
In order to establish the appropriate beam arrangement for use in stereotactic radiotherapy using a linear accelerator, dose volume distributions were calculated for a number of spherical targets in a head phantom and assessment was made by dose sparing of normal tissue outside the target volume. Using a single isocentre, fixed beam arrangements were compared with single and multiple non-coplanar isocentric arc rotations at target sizes from 10 to 55 mm diameter on a 6 MV Philips linear accelerator. From the dose-volume histograms produced, an arrangement of 3 or 4 arcs of rotation proved most suitable, in terms of sparing of normal tissue outside the target volume to high dose irradiation, across the range of target sizes studied. There was little further benefit with increasing the number of arcs beyond this. At target sizes greater than 20 mm diameter an arrangement of 6 static non-coplanar beams achieved sparing equivalent to multiple arc rotations and may have considerable advantages in the treatment of irregular volumes where customised beam shaping could be employed.
Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy may be achieved by using a combination of geometrically shaped radiation fields from different orientations around the patient. A convenient method to shape the fields is to use a multileaf collimator. These fields are shaped to the beam's-eye-view of the target volume, at each orientation of the collimator, and may also encompass sensitive structure, i.e. organs at risk, if the target region has concavities in its outline within which such structure may reside. The term 'conformal therapy' is used in this paper to mean tailoring the high dose volume to the target volume whilst minimising dose to other normal structures (organs at risk) which may be irradiated by the treatment fields, shaped by a multileaf collimator. The question then arises of the optimum distribution of beam weights to apply to the fields to minimise dose to organs at risk whilst aiming towards a uniform dose distribution in the target volume. This paper provides a method of optimizing the choice of beamweights to achieve this. The method is based on the well known optimization technique of simulated annealing. Either an optimal set of beamweights, one weight per field, is generated or the intensity may be spatially modulated across the field at each orientation (two weights per field) depending on whether there is just target volume or both target volume and volume containing organs at risk in the line of sight. It is shown that the dose matrix resulting from the latter optimization is closer to the dose prescription than that obtained by using either an optimal set of single weights per field or uniform beamweights.
A new system has been developed for stereotactically delivering prescribed high doses of radiation to precisely located volumes of approximately 0.6 to 10.0 ml within the brain. A Brown-Roberts-Wells stereotactic apparatus and a 6-MeV linear accelerator equipped with a special collimator (12.5 to 30 mm in diameter) have been adapted. The 20-mm collimator allows treatment of a nearly spherical volume of 2.1 ml. Outside the treatment field, the dosage declines to 80% of the dose prescribed for the periphery of the lesion over a distance of 1.8 mm and to 50% over the next 3.4 mm. Localization can be accomplished via computed tomography or cerebral angiography. Treatment is accomplished with an arcing beam of photon radiation with the turntable (couch) in each of four positions. The entire system has been extensively tested for accuracy in alignment and distribution of radiation. Errors have been measured for the alignment of the apparatus and for the process of localization. Safety of operation was emphasized throughout the design and testing phase.
The purpose of this study is to quantify and compare retrospectively the effects of treatment setup variation on beam's eye view (BEV) dosimetry for radiation therapy using a multileaf collimator (MLC) vs. cerrobend block.
A study was performed on a group of 18 patients with cancer of the head and neck, lung, and pelvis who were treated with irregularly shaped fields. The BEV dosimetry of the fields shaped with cerrobend blocks and the MLC was measured with films at the depth of dose prescription in a solid water phantom. A "one-half-leaf" insertion convention was used to shape the MLC. In addition, an average of 15 sequential daily port films was taken per patient during the course of radiotherapy. The port films were aligned with the prescription film for each patient. Systematic error and random error of treatment setup for each patient were calculated. The effects of setup variation were incorporated by convolving the patient portal imaging data with the corresponding BEV film dosimetry. Two parameters were used to quantify the BEV dosimetry. First, the field penumbra width was calculated, which represented the average of the normal separations between 20 and 80% isodose lines along the prescription outline. Second, the ratio of areas covered by the 90 and 20% isodose lines, A90/20, was determined. The BEV dosimetry was then characterized with and without the effects of treatment setup variation. In addition, the difference in BEV dosimetry between the cerrobend block and the MLC was used to estimate the corresponding changes in tumor control probability (TCP). These changes were also compared to the changes in TCP for the treatment with or without the effects of random setup variation.
With or without daily setup variation, the use of cerrobend block was more favorable than the MLC in terms of the field penumbra width and A90/20 for all treatment sites. In the absence of daily variation, the MLC field penumbra width was on average 1.3 mm larger than that of the cerrobend block, and 0.9 mm larger in the presence of daily setup variation. Similarly, the ratio A90/20 of the cerrobend block was on average 0.03 larger than that of MLC without daily setup variation, and 0.02 with daily setup variation. The difference in field penumbra width and A90/20 between the MLC and the cerrobend block was slightly reduced due to the effects of daily setup variation. For both the cerrobend block and the MLC, daily setup variation produced a significant increase in the field penumbra width, 2.3 mm for the cerrobend block and 1.9 mm for the MLC, and a decrease in the A90/20, 0.06 for the former and 0.05 for the latter. The change due to the daily setup variation was about a factor of 2 larger than the changes due to replacing the cerrobend block with the MLC. Using the TCP model, the change in TCP due to the daily setup variation was more than a factor of 3 larger than the change in TCP due to replacing the cerrobend block with the MLC. It was noted that the average changes in the penumbra, the A90/20 and the TCP calculated for the patient population did not adequately describe the changes for the individual patient.
Our results do not show significant dosimetric differences between the MLC and the cerrobend block in conventional radiation treatment, whether or not daily setup variation was taken into consideration. The effects of daily setup variation alone produced a larger dosimetric change. The same results were obtained when the data were applied to calculate changes in TCP. For optimal radiation therapy, efforts should be concentrated on reducing daily setup variation. Our results also demonstrate the importance of frequent evaluation of MLC treatment using electronic portal imaging devices.
Three-dimensional (3D) geometric conformation of the therapeutic dose volume to the shape of a target tissue volume is the motivation for both conformal radiotherapy and radiosurgery. Although noncoplanar arcs have a clear physical and geometric advantage over fixed fields for small spherical targets, those advantages are reduced for large or irregularly shaped targets where static fields can be individually shaped. We have developed a system that allows efficient and flexible design and reliable delivery of customized "bouquets" of fixed nonopposed coplanar or noncoplanar shaped fields, resulting in highly uniform dose distributions. This report describes our initial experience using beam bouquets to treat intracranial lesions.
Patients with primary (11) or metastatic (4) intracranial lesions with a maximum diameter less than approximately 6 cm, most of whom candidates for single-fraction radiosurgery, were treated with beam bouquets of four to eight nonopposed coplanar or noncoplanar beams. Doses ranged from 16-20 Gy in four fractions for recurrent lesions (8) to 45 to 68 Gy in 25 to 34 fractions for primary lesions (7). The patients were immobilized with custom foam head supports and face masks attached to a fixed base plate. Planning computed tomography scans were acquired, from which the physician developed the custom beam bouquet using 3D treatment-planning tools. The bouquet was designed based primarily on geometric concerns. The bouquet was subsequently modified to add wedge filters chosen by vector analysis of dose gradients to achieve uniform dose over the volume of beam crossfire. At the time of treatment, the isocenter was placed using the instructions provided by the treatment-planning system and pretreatment orthogonal port films were compared to digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) to assure proper isocenter placement. For several situations, the 3D dose distributions resulting from alternative coplanar and noncoplanar plans were compared.
Each patient was treated without incident. Daily pretreatment port films showed excellent reproducibility of isocenter placement in 87% of setups. With short follow-up (0-12 months), two patients with recurrent glioblastoma experienced clinical deterioration 2 to 4 weeks following treatment. One had increased edema on scans and responded to steroids. Six patients clinically improved following radiation therapy. Review of alternative treatment plans reveals that the relative utility of coplanar vs. noncoplanar beams is likely dependent on the location of the lesion. Noncoplanar beam bouquets are likely preferable to coplanar beams when the target is located in the central regions of the head. Coplanar beams are likely adequate, and possibly preferable, for peripherally located targets.
The biological advantages of fractionation and the physical advantages of radiosurgery are exploited with this approach. The use of multiple nonopposed coplanar or noncoplanar conformal wedged fields provides a uniform dose to the target and acceptable dose gradient at the target edge. This technique may prove to be an alternative to arc-based radiosurgery in some settings and has the potential advantages that fractionation should improve the therapeutic ratio, and each beam can be individually shaped to conform to irregularly shaped targets. Additional studies are underway to improve this system and better define its utility.
Clinical implementation of multileaf collimation (MLC) includes commissioning (including leaf calibration), dosimetric measurements (penumbra, transmission, calculation parameters), shaping methods, networking for file transfer, verification simulation, and development of a quality assurance (QA) program. Differences of MLC and alloy shaping in terms of penumbra and stair-step effects must be analyzed.
Leaf positions are calibrated to light field. The resultant decrement line, penumbras, leaf transmission data, and isodoses in various planes were measured with film. Penumbra was measured for straight edges and corners, in various media. Ion chambers were used to measure effects of MLC on output, scatter, and depth dose. We maintain midleaf intersection criteria. MLC fields are set 7 mm beyond planning target volumes. After shaping by vendor software or by our three-dimensional planning system, files are transferred to the MLC workstation by means of sharing software, interface cards, and cabling. A MLC emulator was constructed for simulation. Our QA program includes file checks, monthly checks (leaf position accuracy and interlock tests), and annual review.
We found the MLC leaf position (light field) corresponds to decrement lines ranging from 50 to 59%. Transmission through MLC (1.5-2.5%) is less than alloy (3.5%). Multileaf penumbra is slightly wider than for alloy. Relative penumbra did not increase in the lung, and composite field dosimetry exhibited negligible differences compared with alloy. Verification simulations provide diagnostic image quality hard copies of the MLC fields. Monitor unit parameters used for alloy held for MLC.
Clinical implementation for MLC as a block replacement was conducted on a site-by-site basis. Time studies indicate significant (25%) in-room time reductions. Through imaging and dosimetric analysis, the accuracy of field delivery has increased with MLC. The most significant impact of MLC is the ability to increase the number of daily treatment fields, thereby reducing normal tissue dosing, which is vital for dose escalation.
Three dimensional conformal radiation treatments are complex, often involving large numbers of blocked or multileaf collimated fields that shape regions of high dose to conform to the treatment volume. As manual definition and digitization of aperture shapes and their corresponding multileaf configurations can be impractically time consuming, it was necessary to integrate the planning of multileaf fields into an existing three dimensional treatment planning system and improve the efficiency of treatment delivery to make these treatments feasible on a routine basis.
A subfunction of the Beam's Eye View (BEV) component can be used to automatically generate a continuous aperture shape with a margin around the tumor to account for beam penumbra, and excluding any normal structures to be spared (each with its own margin). To convert a continuous aperture shape into one defined by the multileaf collimator (MLC), a leaf coverage mode is chosen to determine how leaves are fitted to aperture shapes. The conversion process also considers parameters of the specific MLC system, e.g., leaf thickness and the number of leaves. If normal structures to be shielded split the target into multiple regions, more than one multileaf aperture can result. An interactive leaf adjustment routine is also provided to allow for modification of individual leaf positions. Dose calculation programs then take into account multileaf apertures for computation of dose distributions using a pencil beam convolution model. Finally, prescription files specifying leaf and jaw configurations are prepared in treatment machine specific formats and downloaded to the computers driving the multileaf collimators and other components of the treatment machines.
An example is presented of a prostate treatment plan, with MLC configurations, dose distributions, and treatment delivery description, along with discussion of clinical implementation at Memorial Hospital.
A mathematical model is derived for digitally controlled linear accelerators to deliver a desired photon intensity distribution by combining collimator motion and machine dose rate variations. It shows that, at any instant, the quotient of the machine dose rate and the speed of collimator motion is proportional to the gradient of the desired in-air photon fluence distribution. The model is applicable for both independently controlled collimator jaws and multileaf collimators and can be implemented by controlling different parameters to accommodate linear accelerators from different manufactures. For independent jaws, each pair of jaws creates photon fluence variations along the direction of the jaw movement. For multileaf collimators, where each leaf is independently controlled, any two-dimensional (2D) photon fluence distribution can be delivered. The model has been implemented for wedged isodose distributions using independent jaws, and 2D intensity modulation using a multileaf collimator. One-dimensional (1D) wedged isodose distributions are created by moving an independent jaw at constant speed while varying machine dose rate. 2D intensity modulation has been implemented using a 'dynamic stepping' scheme, which controls the leaf progression during irradiation at constant machine dose rate. With this automated delivery scheme, the beam delivery time for dynamic intensity modulation, which depends on the complexity of the desired intensity distribution, approaches that of conventional beam modifiers. This paper shows the derivation of the model, its application, and our delivery scheme. Examples of 1D dynamic wedges and 2D intensity modulations will be given to illustrate the versatility of the model, the simplicity of its application, and the efficiency of beam delivery. These features make this approach practical for delivering conformal therapy treatments.
To compare the misalignment error due to the fabrication of custom lead alloy blocks with the displacement error introduced by the finite resolution of a multileaf collimator relative to the prescribed smooth apertures.
Treatment field apertures for randomly selected patients for four clinical sites were obtained at various stages of the block fabrication process. These apertures and the corresponding multileaf collimator (MLC) apertures for each field were superimposed with the smooth apertures prescribed by physicians. The deviations from the prescribed apertures were measured at 10 degrees intervals. Comparisons of the magnitude and frequency of errors from block fabrication with those from the geometric displacements introduced by the finite leaf width of the multileaf collimator were made.
The degree of conformity of the multileaf collimator is treatment-site dependent as, in general, are the shapes of fields. For three of the four sites examined, the multileaf collimator apertures track the prescribed apertures at least as accurately as custom blocking when the block design, construction, mounting, and alignment on the treatment machine are considered.
The geometric conformality of multileaf collimation is comparable to, and in some cases superior to, that of custom blocks.
A dose calculation algorithm has been developed for photon beams with intensity modulation generated by dynamic jaw or multileaf collimations. First, an in-air fluence distribution is constructed based on the dynamic motion of the jaws or leaves, taking into account the variation of output with field size defined by the jaws. The fluence distribution is then convolved with the appropriate pencil beam kernel to give correction factors which are used to calculate the dose distribution for an intensity-modulated photon field. The proposed algorithm is strictly valid in homogeneous media only, patient heterogeneity correction is accounted for in an approximate manner. Dose distributions at several depths and for several field sizes were calculated for 6- and 15-MV x-ray beams for a set of standard wedges produced by dynamic jaws. Measurements were made with film and an ion chamber. Comparisons between calculated and measured data show good agreement (within 2%) for both dose profiles and wedge factors. Similar calculations and measurements were also made for a 25-MV intensity-modulated photon field produced by dynamic motion of a multileaf collimator. Agreement between calculations and measurements is also good (within 3%). The "tongue-and-groove" effect associated with a multileaf collimator design is also examined using a ring-shaped field produced by matching two component fields. The computation time for a dynamic-collimated field is the same as that for an irregular field shaped by conventional blocks. The algorithm is applicable to any pattern of jaw or multileaf motions. The strengths and remaining problems of the algorithm are discussed.
Purpose:
The purpose of this work is to develop a prescription preparation system for efficient field shaping using a multileaf collimator that can be used in community settings as well as research institutions. The efficiency advantage of the computer-controlled multileaf collimator, over cerrobend blocks, to shape radiation fields has been shown in conformal treatments, which typically require complete volumetric computerized tomographic data for three-dimensional radiation treatment planning--a utility not readily available to the general community. As a result, most patients today are treated with conventional radiation therapy. Therefore, we believe that it is very important to fully use the same efficiency advantage of multileaf collimator as a block replacement in conventional practice.
Methods and material:
The multileaf collimator prescription preparation system developed by us acquires prescription images from different sources, including film scanner and radiation treatment planning systems. The multileaf collimator angle and leaf positions are set from the desired field contour defined on the prescription image, by minimizing the area discrepancies. Interactive graphical tools include manual adjustment of collimator angle and leaf positions, and definition of portions of the field edges that require maximal conformation. Data files of the final leaf positions are transferred to the multileaf collimator controller via a dedicated communication link.
Results:
We have implemented the field prescription preparation system and a network model for integrating the multileaf collimator and other radiotherapy modalities for routine treatments. For routine plan evaluation, isodose contours measured with film in solid water phantom at prescription depth are overlaid on the prescription image. Preliminary study indicates that the efficiency advantage of the MLC over cerrobend blocks in conformal therapy also holds true for conventional treatments.
Conclusion:
Our model of computer-controlled prescription, evaluation, and treatment using multileaf collimators can be effectively implemented in both community settings and research institutions. The resultant increase in treatment efficiency and accuracy is now available for conventional radiotherapy.
We compare different collimator forms (circular, elliptic and multi-leaf) in 3-D multiple arc rotation therapy for irregularly shaped intracranial tumors. When homogeneous irradiation of the tumor is ensured, the efficiency of treatment is expressed by the sparing of normal tissue outside the target volume to high dose irradiation. By utilizing integral dose-volume histograms we demonstrate that the multi-leaf collimator has considerable advantages.
A method for modulating beam fluence from a linear accelerator is discussed. The beam modulation is accomplished remotely using a multileaf collimator and does not require entering the treatment room.
The multileaf collimator is used to define a series of field shapes that are superimposed at a fixed gantry angle to produce any desired fluence pattern. A heuristic technique for deriving the field shapes and corresponding monitor unit settings is described. The technique has been tested on randomly generated fluence distributions and on distributions with a limited number of peaks and valleys. The second type of distribution more closely simulates fluence patterns obtained with dose optimization software. Estimates of the time required to use this approach to treat a four-field plan are given and compared to the technique of placing a physical compensator in each beam.
It has been demonstrated that complex fluence patterns within a 15 x 15 cm2 field can be achieved with less than 20 fields. Estimates show that this technique is faster than entering the treatment room to change physical compensators. Some limitations of the method are discussed.
Optimized distributions that conform the dose to irregularly shaped target volumes that wrap around critical structures are possible using superimposed multileaf fields. A method for defining the field shapes is presented.
Stereotactic radiotherapy using a linear accelerator is usually equated with the technique of delivery using multiple non-coplanar arcs, which achieves a spherical dose distribution. As the majority of intracranial lesions are not spherical, a range of schematized tumour shapes were planned to assess the role of static conformal beams in the treatment of irregular lesions. A sphere and 2 ellipsoids, ranging from 20 to 50 mm maximum diameter located intracranially were planned using 3, 4, and 6 non-coplanar static beams with conformal blocks and were compared with four 120 degree non-coplanar arcs. Comparison of the plans was made by the relative sparing of normal tissue outside the target volume using three-dimensional dose-volume distributions. Non-coplanar arcs spared more normal tissue at low isodoses and achieved the best high dose sparing for spherical targets. For the majority of irregular targets, 3 and 4 static beams spared more tissue at doses > or = 50% and > or = 80% than the arc technique. For all irregular volumes, maximum sparing of normal tissue to isodoses > or = 50% and > or = 80% of the treatment isodose was obtained with 6 static conformal beams. We conclude that irregularly shaped tumours suitable for stereotactic radiotherapy with a linear accelerator are better treated with conformal static non-coplanar beams rather than with the multiple arc technique.
A multidisciplinary Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) task force has developed quality assurance guidelines for radiosurgery. The purpose of the guidelines are fourfold: (1) To ensure that participating institutions have the proper equipment and appropriate technique(s) to administer radiosurgery; (2) to outline a standard data set for each treated patient to assess protocol compliance; (3) to define minor and major deviations in protocol treatment; and (4) to set forth clinical data necessary to determine treatment efficacy, including failure patterns, and treatment toxicity. These guidelines are being implemented into active and developing radiosurgery protocols.
Between November 1988 and December 1992, 195 patients with tumors of the head and neck (low grade gliomas, meningiomas, neurinomas, chordomas and miscellaneous) were treated with a newly developed stereotactical system for fractionated, conformal, high-precision radiotherapy. The overall preparation time, including head mask production for fixation, CT, MRI, 3-D treatment planning and stereotactical localisation could be reduced to 4-5 h per patient. The use of MR in the target definition was increased to a mean of about 60%. The medial follow-up time is 22 months. Three different patient groups were selected according to pretreatment. Patients with full high-precision radiotherapy survived in 95% of cases, patients with boost treatment in 86% and patients with preirradiated recurrent disease in 64%. Meningiomas as the largest histology group (n = 62) showed partial response in 27% and complete response in 10% of cases. Progression occurred in two patients. All patients are alive. Acute side-effects were minimal and of the order of 10%, no late complications occurred despite tumor doses ranging up to 72 Gy. High-precision radiotherapy as it is performed in Heidelberg can be regarded as an effective, reliable and tolerable system for selected tumors of the head and neck.
Commissioning measurements for a multi-leaf collimator installed on a dual energy accelerator with 6 and 15 MV photons are described. Detailed dosimetric characterization of the multi-leaf collimator is a requirement for modeling the collimator with treatment planning software. Measurements include a determination of the penumbra width, leaf transmission, between-leaf leakage, and localization of the leaf ends and sides. Standard radiographic film was used for the penumbra measurements, and separate experiments using radiochromic film and thermoluminescent dosimeters were performed to verify that distortions of the dose distribution at an edge due to changing energy sensitivity of silver bromide film are negligible. Films were analyzed with a scanning laser densitometer with a 210 micron spot. Little change in the penumbra edge distribution was noted for different positions of a leaf in the field. Experiments localizing the physical end of the leaves showed less than 1 mm deviation from the 50% decrement line. This small difference is attributed to the shaped end on the leaves. One side of a single leaf corresponded to the 50% decrement line, but the opposite face was aligned with a lower value. This difference is due to the tongue and groove used to decrease between-leaf leakage. For both energies, approximately 2% of photons incident on the multi-leaf collimator are transmitted and an additional 0.5% leakage occurs between the leaves. Alignment of the leaves to form a straight edge results in a penumbra profile which compares favorably with the standard technique of using alloy blocks. When the edge is stepped, the isodose lines follow the leaf pattern and the boundary is poorly defined compared to divergent blocks.
Clinical studies have been initiated in conformal radiotherapy using a computer controlled multi-leaf collimator. Quantitative dosimetry and treatment planning studies comparing field shaping by lead alloy blocks and the multi-leaf collimator demonstrate the clinical acceptability of the multi-leaf collimator. Sixteen patients with tumors in multiple sites have received some part of their treatments with both blocking systems. Studies of dosimetry and field shaping show that the multi-leaf collimator produces clinically acceptable blocking for most field shapes and disease sites. The 80-20% penumbra was characterized for a wide range of shaped beams. For straight edges perpendicular to the leaf travel, the penumbra of measured dose distributions from the multi-leaf collimator is equal to conventional divergent blocking. When the multi-leaf collimator leaves approach a contour at an angle, the penumbra increases. At forty-five degrees, the maximum angle of approach, the penumbra is approximately 4 mm wider than that for divergent blocks. Three-dimensional treatment planning demonstrates that equivalent dose distributions can be obtained from the two field shaping systems. The multi-leaf collimator can be used effectively and efficiently to treat a variety of disease sites. Its optimal utility may be in treating complex fields--five or more shaped coplanar or non-coplanar beams. It is well suited for conformal therapy applications.
We investigate the use of a multi-leaf collimator for conformal radiation therapy of carcinomas of the prostate and of the nasopharynx. Following verification of dose calculation algorithms for multi-leaf collimated fields using film dosimetry, we compute dose distributions for multi-field conformal treatment using fields shaped with either the multi-leaf collimator or conventional cerrobend blocks. We compare the two sets of treatment plans using graphical isodose displays, tissue specific dose volume histograms, tumor control probabilities, and normal tissue complication probabilities. We also incorporate setup errors into the calculated dose distributions to assess the effect of treatment uncertainties on the various criteria. Based on these comparisons, we conclude that for multi-field conformal radiotherapy for these two disease sites, the use of multi-leaf collimation is equivalent to that of conventional cerrobend blocks.
A multileaf collimator (MLC) can be used as a replacement for conventional blocks as well as for conformal radiotherapy. This study has assessed the possibility of using a Philips MLC for 218 patients treated with conventionally blocked fields. It was found that MLC field shaping would have been appropriate for over 94% of such patients. The facility to treat large blocked fields has been found to be particularly useful. Use of the predefined shapes stored in the Regular Shape Library provided by Philips was evaluated and it was found that an appropriate shape was available in 52% of cases. The application of MLC fields to the treatment of different anatomical sites is discussed.
The work processes for the planning and delivery of shaped beams using a Philips multileaf collimator were studied for two treatment techniques and compared to those for conventional shielding blocks. The MLC proved faster in all cases of treatment delivery providing time reductions of 19-48% for parallel opposed beams and 6-44% for conformal isocentric beams. The workload in the mould room and workshop would be reduced if multileaf collimation is used. Time spent manufacturing and mounting blocks (average 2 h 30 min and 37 min, respectively) is eliminated for the techniques studied. The physics process for generating conformal MLC beams proved faster (average 1 h 36 min) than for blocks (average 2 h 30 min); this was not so for parallel opposed beams. Overall the results suggest that using the MLC is a time- and resource-saving alternative to blocks.
To implement radiotherapy with intensity-modulated beams, based on the inverse method of treatment design and using a multileaf collimation system operating in the dynamic mode.
An algorithm, based on the inverse technique, has been integrated into the radiotherapy treatment-planning computer system in our Center. This method of computer-assisted treatment design was used to derive intensity-modulated beams to optimize the boost portion of the treatment plan for a patient with a T1c cancer of the prostate. A dose of 72 Gy (in 40 fractions) was given with a six-field plan, and an additional 9 Gy (in five fractions) with six intensity-modulated beams. The intensity-modulated fields were delivered using dynamic multileaf collimation, that is, individual leaves were in motion during radiation delivery, with the treatment machine operating in the clinical mode. Exhaustive quality assurance measurement and monitoring were carried out to ensure safe and accurate implementation.
Dose distribution and dose-volume histogram of the "inverse method" boost plan and of the composite (72 Gy primary + 9 Gy boost) plan were judged clinically acceptable. Compared to a manually designed boost plan, the inverse treatment design gave improved conformality and increased dose homogeneity in the planning target volume. Film and ion chamber dosimetry, performed prior to the first treatment, indicated that each of the six intensity-modulated fields was accurately produced. Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) measurements performed on the patient confirmed that the intended dose was delivered in the treatment. In addition, computer-aided treatment-monitoring programs assured that the multileaf collimator (MLC) position file was executed to the specified precision. In terms of the overall radiation treatment process, there will likely be labor savings in the planning and the treatment phases.
We have placed into clinical use an integrated system of conformal radiation treatment that incorporated the inverse method of treatment design and the use of dynamic multileaf collimation to deliver intensity-modulated beams. The system can provide better treatment design, which can be implemented reliably and safely. We are hopeful that improved treatment efficacy will result.
A prototype Miniature Multi-Leaf Collimator (MMLC) designed specifically for radiosurgery and small field radiotherapy has been fabricated and evaluated at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC). This work demonstrates the advantages of a computer-controlled MMLC vs. conventional circular collimation for the treatment of an irregularly shaped target volume in the brain.
Two patient treatments were selected for this comparison from 38 intracranial tumors treated with radiosurgery at UTMDACC from 8/6/91 to 5/10/94. Target contours and critical structures defined for one of the patients was used to create a simulated target volume and critical structures in a spherical head phantom. Computer simulations were performed using traditional single isocenter treatment with a circular collimator for a set of six arcs. The same arc paths were used to compute the dose distribution for the MMLC and conformed beam geometries were defined using a three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning system with beam's eye view capabilities. Then, the calculated dose distribution for a single isocenter, conformal treatment was delivered to the spherical head phantom under static conditions by shaping the MMLC to conform the target volume shape projected as a function of couch rotation and gantry angle. Planar dose distributions through the target volume were measured using therapy verification film located in the phantom. The measurements were used to verify that the 3D treatment planning system was capable of simulating the MMLC technique. For the second patient with a peanut-shaped tumor, the 3D treatment planning calculations were used to compare dose distributions for the MMLC and for traditional single and multiple isocenter treatments using circular collimators. The resulting integral dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for the target volume, normal brain, and critical structures for the three treatment techniques were compared.
(a) Analysis of the film dosimetry data exemplified the degree of conformation of the high-dose region to the target shape that is possible with a computer-controlled MMLC. (b) Comparison of measured and calculated dose distributions indicates that the 3D treatment planning system can simulate the MMLC treatment. (c) Comparison of DVHs from the single isocenter MMLC and circular collimator treatments shows similar coverage of the target volume with increased dose to the brain for circular collimation (4). Comparison of DVHs from the single isocenter MMLC with the multiple isocenter circular collimator treatment approach shows a more inhomogeneous dose distribution through the target volume and increased dose to the brain for the latter.
Dosimetry data for single isocenter treatments using computer-controlled field shaping with a MMLC demonstrate the ability to conform the dose distribution to an irregularly shaped target volume. DVHs validated that the single isocenter MMLC treatment is preferable to both single and multiple isocenter, circular collimator treatment because it provides a more uniform dose distribution to an irregularly shaped target volume and reduces the dose to surrounding brain tissue for the example cases.
The purpose of this study is to compare arc-based and mini-multileaf collimator (mMLC)-based radiosurgery treatment plans using isodose distributions and dose-volume histograms.
Of 11 patients who underwent conventional arc-based radiosurgery for intracranial malignancies, four were treated with one isocenter, four were treated with two isocenters and three were treated with three isocenters. The same cases were re-planned using a test version of mMLC-based radiosurgery software for multiple static non-coplanar fields.
For non-spherical targets, treatment planning is relatively intuitive with mMLC-based radiosurgery, reducing the amount of time required for planning. Moreover, a lower dose of radiation is delivered to normal tissue with mMLC-based radiosurgery than with arc-based radiosurgery, which theoretically should lead to a reduced risk of complications.
To improve the local control of patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate we have implemented intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to deliver a prescribed dose of 81 Gy. This method is based on inverse planning and the use of dynamic multileaf collimators (DMLC). Because IMRT is a new modality, a major emphasis was on the quality assurance of each component of the process and on patient safety. In this article we describe in detail our procedures and quality assurance program.
Using an inverse algorithm, we have developed a treatment plan consisting five intensity-modulated (IM) photon fields that are delivered with DMLC. In the planning stage, the planner specifies the number of beams and their directions, and the desired doses for the target, the normal organs and the "overlap" regions. Then, the inverse algorithm designs intensity profiles that best meet the specified criteria. A second algorithm determines the leaf motion that would produce the designed intensity pattern and produces a DMLC file as input to the MLC control computer. Our quality assurance program for the planning and treatment delivery process includes the following components: 1) verification of the DMLC field boundary on localization port film, 2) verification that the leaf motion of the DMLC file produces the planned dose distribution (with an independent calculation), 3) comparison of dose distribution produced by DMLC in a flat phantom with that calculated by the treatment planning computer for the same experimental condition, 4) comparison of the planned leaf motions with that implemented for the treatment (as recorded on the MLC log files), 5) confirmation of the initial and final positions of the MLC for each field by a record-and-verify system, and 6) in vivo dose measurements.
Using a five-field IMRT plan we have customized dose distribution to conform to and deliver 81 Gy to the PTV. In addition, in the overlap regions between the PTV and the rectum, and between the PTV and the bladder, the dose is kept within the tolerance of the respective organs. Our QA checks show acceptable agreement between the planned and the implemented leaf motions. Correspondingly, film and TLD dosimetry indicates that doses delivered agrees with the planned dose to within 2%. As of September 15, 1996, we have treated eight patients to 81 Gy with IMRT.
For complex planning problems where the surrounding normal tissues place severe constraints on the prescription dose, IMRT provides a powerful and efficient solution. Given a comprehensive and rigorous quality-assurance program, the intensity-modulated fields can be efficaciously and accurately delivered using DMLC. IMRT treatment is now ready for routine implementation on a large scale in our clinic.
Fuks Z: 3-D conformal radiation therapy at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre
- Leibel
- Sa
- Kutcher Gj
- Zelefsky Mj
- Burman
- Cm
- R Mohan
- Ling
- Cc
Leibel SA, Kutcher GJ, Zelefsky MJ, Burman CM, Mohan R, Ling CC, Fuks Z: 3-D conformal radiation therapy at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre. Radiat Oncol 1992;2:274–289.
Downloaded by: UCSF Library & CKM 169.230.243.252 -9 Multileaf collimation versus alloy blocks: Analysis of geometric accuracy
- Wurm
76 Wurm et al. Downloaded by: UCSF Library & CKM 169.230.243.252 -9/29/2014 1:10:44 PM LoSasso T, Kutcher GJ: Multileaf collimation versus alloy blocks: Analysis of geometric accuracy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;32:499–506.
A method to produce fixed shaped fields for stereotatic radiosurgery
- W Lutz
- Kimball
Lutz W, Kimball W: A method to produce fixed shaped fields for stereotatic radiosurgery. Med Phys 1994;21:890.
Conformal radiation therapy with fixed shaped coplanar or non-coplanar radiation beam bouquets: A possible alternative to radiosurgery
- Marks Lb Gw Sherouse
- Das S Gc
- Spencer
- Dp
- Turner
Marks LB, Sherouse GW, Das S, Bentel GC, Spencer DP, Turner D: Conformal radiation therapy with fixed shaped coplanar or non-coplanar radiation beam bouquets: A possible alternative to radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;33:1209–1219.