Article

Qualitative Research Methods: What Are They and Why Use Them?

Robert P. Luciano Professor of Health Care Policy, School of Public Affairs, Baruch College, New York, New York 10010, USA.
Health Services Research (Impact Factor: 2.78). 01/2000; 34(5 Pt 2):1101-18.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

To provide an overview of reasons why qualitative methods have been used and can be used in health services and health policy research, to describe a range of specific methods, and to give examples of their application.
Classic and contemporary descriptions of the underpinnings and applications of qualitative research methods and studies that have used such methods to examine important health services and health policy issues.
Qualitative research methods are valuable in providing rich descriptions of complex phenomena; tracking unique or unexpected events; illuminating the experience and interpretation of events by actors with widely differing stakes and roles; giving voice to those whose views are rarely heard; conducting initial explorations to develop theories and to generate and even test hypotheses; and moving toward explanations. Qualitative and quantitative methods can be complementary, used in sequence or in tandem. The best qualitative research is systematic and rigorous, and it seeks to reduce bias and error and to identify evidence that disconfirms initial or emergent hypotheses.
Qualitative methods have much to contribute to health services and health policy research, especially as such research deals with rapid change and develops a more fully integrated theory base and research agenda. However, the field must build on the best traditions and techniques of qualitative methods and must recognize that special training and experience are essential to the application of these methods.

  • Source
    • "Ces approches reposent sur l'observation des acteurs humains impliqués dans le phénomène étudié et sur l'interprétation des données empiriques récoltées. Ces données souvent subjectives portent généralement sur des aspects spécifiquement humains tels que la perception, la compréhension ou les convictions de ces acteurs (Sofaer, 1999). Ces approches se réclament d'une vision constructiviste de la démarche scientifique, elles postulent que la connaissance est construite par l'acteur humain et qu'elle est sujette à l'interprétation du chercheur. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cet article est une introduction synthétique aux méthodes empiriques de recherche en ingénierie informatique. Ces méthodes font partie intégrante des sciences de la nature et des sciences du comportement. Dans l’ingénierie des SI en tant que science de conception, ces méthodes sont essentielles pour évaluer et valider l’artéfact conçu, qu’il soit un algorithme, un logiciel, une méthode ou un outil d’ingénierie. Le propos de cet article est de présenter les principaux concepts et termes indispensables pour comprendre ces méthodes, et de mettre en évidence leur capacité à produire une connaissance nouvelle indispensable pour le concepteur d’un artéfact. Cette présentation didactique est illustrée par l’analyse de plusieurs études empiriques publiées récemment. L’analyse met en évidence la multiplicité des approches possibles, le potentiel de certaines méthodes spécifiques issues des sciences sociales, ainsi que l’importance de la réplication en tant que moyen pour confirmer un résultat et contribuer à sa validation sur une plus large échelle.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2015 · Ingénierie des systèmes d information
  • Source
    • "ETA (2008) and others identify both advantages and disadvantages of focus groups. Since a FG is composed of a homogenous group, it saves time and allows participants to communicate openly (Basch, 1987; ETA, 2008; Morgan, 1996; Sofaer, 1999). In addition, FGs are relatively easy to set up; the group dynamic can provide useful information that individual data collection does not provide; and they are useful in gaining insight into a topic that may be more difficult to gather through other data collection methods. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A case study enables social researchers to examine the experiences of participants within a specific context in detail. It involves a study of a particular case from which general principles and rules can be drawn while relying on the analysis of the social context that reflects everyday experience. This article provides practical guidance on how to conduct a qualitative research involving a case studyto develop a theoretical explanation of a social phenomenon while paying sufficient attention to potential criticisms. It is founded on my personal experience of a service-learning programme referred to as the 'Apostolate'.The argument is broad, including an appropriately high proportion of application.
    Full-text · Article · May 2015 · International Journal of Humanities and Social Science
    • "Psychother. (2015well as revealing commonalities between experts in the field, qualitative enquiry could also be helpful in highlighting areas where experts differ in their experiences , viewpoints or opinions (Patton, 2002;Smith et al., 2009;Sofaer, 1999). By exploring both convergence and divergence between expert opinion and experience, qualitative enquiry could also serve to stimulate discussion and debate about how to assess CBT competence. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To offer insight into how cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) competence is defined, measured and evaluated and to highlight ways in which the assessment of CBT competence could be further improved, the current study utilizes a qualitative methodology to examine CBT experts' (N = 19) experiences of conceptualizing and assessing the competence of CBT therapists. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore participants' experiences of assessing the competence of CBT therapists. Interview transcripts were then analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis in order to identify commonalities and differences in the way CBT competence is evaluated. Four superordinate themes were identified: (i) what to assess, the complex and fuzzy concept of CBT competence; (ii) how to assess CBT competence, selecting from the toolbox of assessment methods; (iii) who is best placed to assess CBT competence, expertise and independence; and (iv) pitfalls, identifying and overcoming assessment biases. Priorities for future research and ways in which the assessment of CBT competence could be further improved are discussed in light of these findings. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. A qualitative exploration of experts' experiences, opinions and recommendations for assessing the competence of CBT therapists. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using interpretive phenomenological analysis. Themes identified shed light on (i) what to assess; (ii) how to assess; (iii) who is best placed to assess; and (iv) common pitfalls. Priorities for future research and ways in which the assessment of CBT competence could be further improved are discussed in light of these findings. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    No preview · Article · Apr 2015 · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Show more