ArticlePDF Available

Rapid entire body assessment (REBA)

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

This technical note details the preliminary stage in the development of a postural analysis tool, Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). REBA has been developed to fill a perceived need for a practitioner's field tool, specifically designed to be sensitive to the type of unpredictable working postures found in health care and other service industries. A team of ergonomists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists and nurses collected and individually coded over 600 postural examples to produce a new tool incorporating dynamic and static postural loading factors, human-load interface (coupling), and a new concept of a gravity-assisted upper limb position. Initial reliability for inter-observer coding shows promise but further work is needed to establish the validity of the tool.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Applied Ergonomics 31 (2000) 201}205
Technical note
Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA)
Sue Hignett*, Lynn McAtamney
Ergonomist, Nottingham City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
Director, COPE, Occupational Health and Ergonomic Services Ltd, Nottingham NG8 2RB, UK
Received 20 July 1998; accepted 17 June 1999
Abstract
This technical note details the preliminary stage in the development of a postural analysis tool, Rapid Entire Body Assessment
(REBA). REBA has been developed to "ll a perceived need for a practitioner's"eld tool, speci"cally designed to be sensitive to the type
of unpredictable working postures found in health care and other service industries. A team of ergonomists, physiotherapists,
occupational therapists and nurses collected and individually coded over 600 postural examples to produce a new tool incorporating
dynamic and static postural loading factors, human}load interface (coupling), and a new concept of a gravity-assisted upper limb
position. Initial reliability for inter-observer coding shows promise but further work is needed to establish the validity of the
tool. 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Postural analysis; Manual handling; Physical work load; Hospital ergonomics
1. Introduction
Postural analysis can be a powerful technique for as-
sessing work activities. The risk of musculoskeletal injury
associated with the recorded posture(s), in the context of
a full ergonomic workplace assessment, can be a major
factor for implementing change, so the availability of
task-sensitive "eld techniques is of great assistance for
the ergonomics practitioner.
Most postural analysis techniques have two, usually
contradictory, qualities of generality and sensitivity
(Fransson-Hall et al., 1995). High generality in a postural
analysis method may be compensated by low sensitivity,
for example; the Ovako Working posture Analysis Sys-
tem (OWAS, Karhu et al., 1977) has a wide range of use
but the results can be low in detail (Hignett, 1994). In
contrast NIOSH (Waters et al., 1993) requires detailed
information about speci"c parameters of the posture, to
give high sensitivity with respect to the de"ned indices,
but has a limited application in health care in particular
with respect to animate load handling.
A need was perceived within the spectrum of postural
analysis tools, speci"cally with sensitivity to the type of
*Corresponding author. Tel.: #44(0)-115-969-1169; fax: #44(0)-
115-962-8061.
E-mail address: shignett@ncht.org.uk (S. Hignett)
unpredictable working postures found in health care (e.g.
animate load handling) and other service industries. This
lead to the development of the following postural analy-
sis tool: Rapid Entire Body Assessment, REBA (Hignett,
1998; McAtamney and Hignett, 1995).
2. Aims
The development of REBA aimed to:
EDevelop a postural analysis system sensitive to mus-
culoskeletal risks in a variety of tasks.
EDivide the body into segments to be coded individ-
ually, with reference to movement planes.
EProvide a scoring system for muscle activity caused by
static, dynamic, rapid changing or unstable postures.
ERe#ect that coupling is important in the handling of
loads but may not always be via the hands.
EGive an action level with an indication of urgency.
ERequire minimal equipment }pen and paper method.
3. Development
To de"ne the initial body segment codes, speci"ed
simple tasks were analysed with variations in the load,
movement distance and height. Data were collected using
0003-6870/00/$ - see front matter 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 0 0 3 - 6 8 7 0 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 0 3 9 - 3
Fig. 1. Group A and B body part diagrams.
202 S. Hignett, L. McAtamney /Applied Ergonomics 31 (2000) 201}205
Fig. 2. REBA score sheet.
several techniques including NIOSH (Waters et al.,
1993), Rated Perceived Exertion (Borg, 1985), OWAS,
Body Part Discomfort Survey (Corlett and Bishop, 1976)
and Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (McAtamney and
Corlett, 1993). The analyses were used to establish the
body part ranges shown in the Group A and B diagrams
(Fig. 1) based on the body part diagrams from RULA
(McAtamney and Corlett, 1993). Three ergonomists/
physiotherapists independently coded the 144 posture
combinations and then incorporated the sensitising con-
cepts of load, coupling and activity scores to produce the
"nal REBA score (1}15), with accompanying risk and
action levels.
Additionally, two workshops were held for 14 pro-
fessionals (occupational therapists, physiotherapists,
nurses and ergonomists) involving the collection and
individual coding of over 600 examples of postures from
health care, manufacturing and electricity industries. The
results from these sessions were used to further re"ne
REBA and begin an analysis of inter-observer reliability
of body part coding.
Group A has a total of 60 posture combinations for the
trunk, neck and legs. This reduces to nine possible scores
to which a &Load/Force'score is added. Group B has
a total of 36 posture combinations for the upper arms,
lower arms and wrists, reducing to nine possible scores to
which a &Coupling'score is added. The A and B scores are
combined in Table C to give a total of 144 possible
combinations, and "nally an activity score is added to
give the "nal REBA score.
The following example shows REBA being used to
assess the working posture of a physiotherapist involved
in treating a patient with a right hemiplegia (stroke).
Group A diagrams: The scores shown in Fig. 2 (REBA
score sheet) are obtained from the Group A diagrams:
ETrunk is #exed more than 603and side #exed (4#1).
ENeck is extended (2).
ELegs are both weight bearing and #exed more than 603
(1#2).
S. Hignett, L. McAtamney /Applied Ergonomics 31 (2000) 201}205 203
Table 1
Table A and Load
Table 2
Table B and Coupling
The patient has sitting balance so the LOAD/FORCE
score is zero ((5 kg exerted). Table 1 is used to "nd the
subtotal (8) and the LOAD/FORCE score (0) added to
get Score A (8).
The Group B diagrams are used to score the right
upper limb as follows:
EUpper arm #exed between 453and 903(3), abducted
(#1) and gravity assisted (!1) due to the position of
the trunk.
ELower arm is #exed less than 603(2)
EWrist is between 03and 153#exion/extension with no
deviation or twist (1).
Table 2 is used to "nd the subtotal (4) and the COUP-
LING score (1) is added to get Score B (5).
Score C (10) is obtained from Table 3 and the AC-
TIVITY score (#1) added as there has been a
large range change in posture as the physiotherapist
reaches forward to the #oor to re-position the patient's
foot.
The total REBA score is 11, this refers to a REBA
action level of 4 (Table 4), indicating a very high risk of
injury to the physiotherapist and that action is necessary
NOW to further assess this task with the aim of reducing
the risk level.
204 S. Hignett, L. McAtamney /Applied Ergonomics 31 (2000) 201}205
Table 3
Table C and Activity Score
Table 4
REBA action levels
Action level REBA score Risk level Action (including further
assessment)
0 1 Negligible None necessary
12}3 Low May be necessary
24}7 Medium Necessary
38}10 High Necessary soon
11}15 Very high Necessary NOW
4. Discussion
During the second workshop there was a change in
one of the body part ranges, the Upper Arm category, to
introduce the gravity assisted score (!1) for upper limb
#exion with trunk #exion. The inter-observer reliability
of the 14 participants for coding achieved between 62 and
85% agreement (omitting the Upper Arm category).
Although the initial development of REBA shows
promise as a useful postural analysis tool, further valida-
tion needs to be carried out. Others may be better placed
to carry out this validation, perhaps in cross reference
with other tools (OWAS, NIOSH, Posture targeting,
biomechanical models) or through empirical measure-
ment in a laboratory setting.
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to our development collaborators for
their hard work and lateral thinking during the work-
shops }Val Noble, Linda Allen, Pat Alexander,
Nigel Corlett, Joan Gabbett, Aileen Hunter, Nicky
Hunter, Harvey Lee, Katherine Metters, Polly Redfern,
Sue Ruszala, Deborah Southworth and Elizabeth
Thompson.
References
Borg, G., 1985. An Introduction to Borg's RPE-Scale. Movement
Publications, Ithaca, NY.
Corlett, E.N., Bishop, R.P., 1976. A technique for assessing postural
discomfort. Ergonomics 19 (2), 175}182.
Fransson-Hall, C., Gloria, R., Kilbom, A., Winkel, J., 1995. A portable
ergonomic observation method (PEO) for computerised on-line
recording of postures and manual handling. Appl. Ergon. 26 (2),
93}100.
Hignett, S., 1994. Using computerised OWAS for postural analysis of
nursing work. In: Robertson, S. (Ed.), Contemporary Ergonomics.
Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 253}258.
Hignett, S., 1998. Ergonomics. In: Pitt-Brooke, J., Reid, H., Lockwood
J., Kerr, K. (Eds.), Rehabilitation of Movement. Theoretical Basis of
Clinical Practice. W.B Saunders Company Ltd, London,
pp. 480}486 (Chapter 13).
Karhu, O., Kansi, P., Kuorinka, I., 1977. Correcting working postures
in industry: a practical method for analysis. Appl. Ergon. 8 (4),
199}201.
McAtamney, L., Corlett, E.N., 1993. RULA: a survey method for the
investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl. Ergon. 24
(2), 91}99.
McAtamney, L., Hignett, S., 1995. REBA: a rapid entire body assess-
ment method for investigating work related musculoskeletal dis-
orders. Proceedings of the Ergonomics Society of Australia,
Adelaide, pp. 45}51.
Waters, T.R., Putz-Anderson, V., Garg, A., Fine, L.J., 1993. Revised
NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting
tasks. Ergonomics 36 (7), 749}776.
S. Hignett, L. McAtamney /Applied Ergonomics 31 (2000) 201}205 205
... Traditionally, ergonomic rules for postural assessment have been established based on onsite observation. The widely used tools include rapid upper limb assessment (RULA) [8], the Ovako working posture analysis system (OWAS) [9], the rapid entire body assessment (REBA) [10], while the subjective process lacks efficiency and reliability [11]. Recently, robust digital technologies have enabled the automation of the evaluation process. ...
... Then, the body part score and whole-body score can be calculated sequentially, according to the established rules. The detailed rules and process can be referred to in the original study to avoid redundancy [10]. ...
Conference Paper
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are prevalent among construction workers, negatively impacting their occupational health, safety, and working performance. Though various ergonomic risk assessment methods have been developed, limited of them have integrated different indicators to provide a more comprehensive assessment scheme based on diverse data sources. Thus, this study proposes a framework that considers both postural and physiological perspectives to narrow this research gap. It integrates the computer visionbased postural assessment and the cumulative muscle fatigue analysis using electromyography (EMG) sensors. Then, the fused results can be obtained through a knowledge-based risk matrix. The proposed method has been applied in a realistic case study to demonstrate its effectiveness and feasibility. This study contributes to enriching the ergonomic risk assessment methods based on data fusion and the adoption of different digital technologies. It has the potential to facilitate effective ergonomic risk management, thereby promoting OHS in the construction industry.
... The Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) scale [27] was employed to evaluate the ergonomic challenges associated with specific tasks performed by participants, thereby assessing their potential contribution to the development of WRMSDs. The REBA scale demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.818) and effective inter-observer reliability (Fleiss kappa = 0.61). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs) are significant concern in intensive care units (ICUs) due to distinct work environment. This study aims to comprehensively investigate determinants of WRMSDs and ergonomic challenges, specific to ICU nurses, providing valuable insights for targeted interventions. Methods In this six-month convergent mixed methods study, 200 consenting nurses with over one year of experience from seven ICUs across three public tertiary hospitals of Ahmedabad participated. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data on socio-demographics, occupation, physical and workplace factors, risk perception, and musculoskeletal pain (through modified Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire) and ergonomic issues using REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) scale. Qualitative insights were obtained through in-depth interviews until saturation of responses. Statistical analysis involved chi-square, t-test and logistic regression, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Thematic analysis was used to interpret the findings of qualitative study. Results The study included predominantly female ICU nurses (78%) with a mean age of 34 years. A high prevalence of WRMSDs (84%) was observed, with the lower back and neck being the most affected regions. Nurses with WRMSDs reported significantly higher mean scores for physical factors (15.1 vs. 11.1, p = 0.00), physical workload (12.8 vs. 10.7, p = 0.001), work environment (13.1 vs. 10.1, p = 0.00), and risk perception (11.8 vs. 8.9, p = 0.00) compared to those without WRMSDs. Logistic regression identified key risk factors for WRMSDs, including longer ICU tenure [OR = 1.4 (1.13–1.66)], high shift frequency [OR = 2.7 (1.27–5.95)], higher physical factor score [OR = 1.2 (1.05–1.42)], higher physical workload score [OR = 1.2 (1.09–1.49)], higher risk perception [OR = 1.3 (1.10–1.78)], and lack of exercise [OR = 0.5 (0.27–0.93)]. The qualitative findings highlighted key ergonomic challenges, including inadequate equipment, heavy patient loads, poor posture during tasks, and insufficient breaks, contributing to WRMSDs among ICU nurses. Conclusion The findings underscore urgent need for targeted interventions to address risk factors associated with WRMSDs, including ergonomic training, workplace modifications, and education programs to enhance risk awareness and preventive behaviours. Future research should focus on developing and evaluating comprehensive interventions that integrate both physical and work environment factors to effectively mitigate WRMSDs among ICU nurses.
... In the REBA scores, 1 point indicates a negligible risk, 2-3 points indicate low risk and that changes may be necessary, 4-5 points indicate medium risk and that changes are necessary, 8-10 points indicate high risk needing investigation, and a score of 11 and above indicates very high risk and the need to implement the change. 21 Data was analysed using SPSS 21. Data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation, median with interquartile range (IQR), or as frequencies and percentages, as appropriate. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To determine the association of musculoskeletal disorders with ergonomic training and equipment with respect to the quality of life of nurses working in the intensive care unit. Method: The experimental study was conducted at Eskisehir Osmangazi University Health, Practice and Research Hospital from November 2018 to December 2019, and comprised adult intensive care unit nurses. The nurses were provided with ergonomic equipment (rollboards) to facilitate the transfer patients from bed to stretcher and from stretcher to bed. The nurses were trained on the use of rollboards for a month. Data was collected at baseline and after the training using a personal data collection form, Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire, Rapid Entire Body Assessment, and Short Form-36. Data was analysed using SPSS 21. Results: Of the 103 nurses, 71(58.9%) were females and 32(31.1%) were males. There were 30(29.1%) subjects aged 25-29 years, and body mass index was <25kg/m2 in 62(60.2%). Median risk score for lower back was 3.50 (interquartile range: 1.50-14.00; Z=-2.58, p=0.01) and for risky working posture it was 5.00 (interquartile range: 5.00-7.00; Z=-8.39, p<0.001) of nurses which decreased after training and the use of equipment. The sub-dimension scores of the quality of life for the physical function, mental health, social function, general health perception and pain decreased post-intervention, but the difference was not significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: Nurses' musculoskeletal symptoms decreased as a result of ergonomic training and equipment use. Although ergonomic training and equipment use did not affect nurses' quality of life, the ergonomic workplace increased their awareness of ergonomic risk assessment. Key Words: Education, Ergonomics, Musculoskeletal system, Nurses, Quality of life.
Article
Background Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are work-related injuries that can impact the movement or function of the human body's musculoskeletal system. Objective This study aims to assess musculoskeletal disorders and ergonomic risk factors (awkward posture and repetitive motions) among laboratory workers. Methods 49 laboratory workers were assessed in this cross-sectional study. MSD prevalence was evaluated using the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ). Awkward posture was assessed with the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) approach, and repetitive motion was evaluated using the Assessment of Repetitive Tasks (ART) Tools. The data was analysed using SPSS Version 26.0. Results MSDs were most prevalent in the neck (91.8%), followed by the left shoulder (87.5%), right shoulder (85.7%), and lower back (85.7%) in the past week. The level of ergonomic risk for awkward posture is high risk (RULA score = 7), although most repetitive motion tasks indicate low risk (ART score <11). There is a significant correlation between the frequency of MSD and risk factors such age, gender, and shift employment. Conclusions It is recommended to implement ergonomic approaches, such as modifying workstations to promote good body postures during jobs, to decrease the likelihood of musculoskeletal problems among laboratory workers.
Article
Full-text available
The advancement of Human–Robot Collaboration (HRC) in industrial environments has underscored the importance of establishing harmonious and symbiotic relationships between human operators and robots. This study, in line with the principles of Industry 5.0, proposes an approach to support the integration of human operators’ capabilities with advanced robotics, enhancing collaborative productivity and fostering a paradigm shift towards a more interactive and beneficial human–robot symbiosis. Prior research has established the basic principles of Symbiotic Human–Robot Collaboration (SHRC) but has often neglected the critical problem of how to conduct collaborative tasks to exploit the potential of these symbiotic interactions. This paper presents a novel methodology to support the design of protocols for collaborative tasks, with the aim of promoting positive symbiotic interactions between human operators and collaborative robots. The focus is on developing tasks that integrate positive symbiotic interactions, determining task performers and optimizing the mutual benefits derived from task execution. A case study is presented to illustrate the practical application of this methodology in a real-world context.
Article
Full-text available
In 1985, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) convened an ad hoc committee of experts who reviewed the current literature on lifting, recommend criteria for defining lifting capacity, and in 1991 developed a revised lifting equation. Subsequently, NIOSH developed the documentation for the equation and played a prominent role in recommending methods for interpreting the results of the equation. The 1991 equation reflects new findings and provides methods for evaluating asymmetrical lifting tasks, lifts of objects with less than optimal hand-container couplings, and also provides guidelines for a larger range of work durations and lifting frequencies than the 1981 equation. This paper provides the basis for selecting the three criteria (biomechanical, physiological, and psychophysical) that were used to define the 1991 equation, and describes the derivation of the individual components (Putz-Anderson and Waters 1991). The paper also describes the lifting index (LI), an index of relative physical stress, that can be used to identify hazardous lifting tasks. Although the 1991 equation has not been fully validated, the recommended weight limits derived from the revised equation are consistent with or lower than those generally reported in the literature. NIOSH believes that the revised 1991 lifting equation is more likely than the 1981 equation to protect most workers.
Article
A technique is described which enables the distribution of discomfort in the body, and its change during the work poriod, to he recorded. The recorded data indicate points of inadequate man-machine compatibility as well as permitting the evaluation of the effectiveness of machine designs. When used in conjunction with moasures of production performance the technique provides direct evidence of the benefits of orgonomic changes. Its use is illustrated in relation to a study of spot welders.
Article
The aim of the study was to present an observation method focusing on the positions of the hands relative to the body and to evaluate whether this simple observation technique gives a reliable estimate of the total time spent in each of five work postures during one workday. In the first part of the study the interobserver reliability of the observation method was tested with eight blue-collar workers. In the second part the observed time spent with work above the shoulder level was tested in relation to an upper-arm position analyzer, and observed time spent in work below knuckle level was tested in relation to a trunk flexion analyzer, both with 72 blue-collar workers. The interobserver reliability for full-day registrations was high. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.99 to 1.00. The observed duration of work with hands above shoulder level correlated well with the measured duration of pronounced arm elevation (> 75 degrees). The product moment correlation coefficient was 0.97. The observed duration of work with hands below knuckle level correlated well with the measured duration of pronounced trunk flexion angles (> 40 degrees). The product moment correlation coefficient was 0.98. The present observation method, designed to make postural observations continuously for several hours, is easy to learn and seems reliable.
Article
The purchase, cleaning and maintenance of air mattresses can be an expensive part of pressure sore prevention and repositioning of patients can be time consuming and costly in terms of possible nursing injuries. The King's Fund bed has been a friend to the health service for many years but the time has come to look for an alternative system that will support patient comfort and independence, will assist nurses in implementation of a no-lifting policy and aid pressure sore prevention policies. This article describes a study that was undertaken in two medical wards to assess the value of electrically controlled beds in relation to the prevention of pressure sores, implementation of a no-lifting policy and quality of patient care. A total of 782 patients took part in the study over a 6-month period and 726 replies were obtained from nurses. The ward had similar profiles of patients' medical conditions and age; they were being medically managed by the same consultants. Results showed that patients experienced greater comfort on beds with the electric facility, produced less pressure sores, mobilized easily and pressure sore prevention costs could be reduced. There is a need to be proactive in prevention of pressure sores and not reactive to a pressure sore that is already developing.
Article
A practical method for identifying and evaluating poor working postures, ie, the Ovako Working Posture Analysing System (OWAS), is presented. The method consists of two parts. The first is an observational technique for evaluating working postures. It can be used by work-study engineers in their daily routine and it gives reliable results after a short training period. The second part of the method is a set of criteria for the redesign of working methods and places. The criteria are based on evaluations made by experienced workers and ergonomics experts. They take into consideration factors such as health and safety, but the main emphasis is placed on the discomfort caused by the working postures. The method has been extensively used in the steel company which participated in its development. Complete production lines have already been redesigned on the basis of information gathered from OWAS, the result being more comfortable workplaces as well as a positive effect on production quality.
Article
A new portable ergonomic observation method (PEO) is presented. It is applicable to most professions and work tasks and requires only moderate human resources for data collection and analysis. Observations are made in real time directly at the workplace using a portable personal or hand-held computer, and data are accessible for immediate analysis and presentation. Duration and number of events are calculated for postures at four body regions (arms, neck, trunk and knee) as well as for manual handling. An evaluation of the PEO method, assessing some important aspects of internal validity as well as intra- and inter-observer reliability, was carried out using video recordings. It showed acceptable validity for some types of physical exposure, and high intra- and inter-observer reliability. Practical experiences from using the PEO method in a field study and further improvements of the method are discussed.
Article
RULA (rapid upper limb assessment) is a survey method developed for use in ergonomics investigations of workplaces where work-related upper limb disorders are reported. This tool requires no special equipment in providing a quick assessment of the postures of the neck, trunk and upper limbs along with muscle function and the external loads experienced by the body. A coding system is used to generate an action list which indicates the level of intervention required to reduce the risks of injury due to physical loading on the operator. It is of particular assistance in fulfilling the assessment requirements of both the European Community Directive (90/270/EEC) on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment and the UK Guidelines on the prevention of work-related upper limb disorders.