Article

Ganapathy S, Amendola A, Lichfield R, et al. Elastomeric pumps for ambulatory patient controlled regional analgesia

Department of Anesthesia, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, Canada.
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia (Impact Factor: 2.53). 10/2000; 47(9):897-902. DOI: 10.1007/BF03019672
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

To report our experience with the use of the (Eclipse) elastomeric pump for ambulatory Patient Controlled Regional Analgesia (PCRA) METHOD: After a pilot study using this device in patients admitted to the hospital, seven patients received PCRA at home using the elastomeric pump. Patients with a variety of continuous regional anesthetic blocks were sent home with written and verbal instructions regarding the use of this device, boluses, side effects of local anesthetics and removal of block catheters. Patients were contacted daily to collect data with regards to the efficacy of the block, problems associated with the use of this device and their satisfaction with the method of analgesia.
During the pilot study there were two catheter disconnections requiring rescue analgesics. Two patients had the entire contents of the bulb delivered over several minutes. Among the seven patients receiving PCRA at home, one patient had to be admitted to the hospital. One patient had block catheter slip out during transit. The volume delivered could not be measured. Patients found it difficult to know if the drug had been delivered. Three patients noted that the pumps were empty earlier than expected. One patient found it difficult to change the bulb. No patient had difficulty with catheter removal or with bolusing.
PCRA offers excellent postoperative analgesia at home. Elastomeric pumps facilitate PCRA but are imprecise with drug delivery and may not be safe for epidural infusions. The safety of this device for peripheral nerve blocks should be evaluated further.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Sugantha Ganapathy, Mar 31, 2015
  • Source
    • "The manufacturers reported flow rates within 15% of their set rates as acceptable (9-12). However, some earlier studies reported abnormal infusion times with resulting over sedation or inadequate analgesia (7, 8). Therefore, the delivery rate accuracy of different brands of elastomeric pumps should be tested in vitro before use. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One of the frequent applications of elastomeric infusion pumps is postoperative pain management. In daily practice, the disposable pumps get refilled with modified medication combinations in the successive days; although, the accuracy of infusion rates is unknown to clinicians. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of repeated filling on the delivery rate accuracy of an elastomeric pump available in our market. We examined 10 elastomeric infusion pumps (BOT-802, Nanchang Biotek Medical Device Company, China) with 100 mL capacity and nominal flow of 5 mL/h. Each pump was filled for three times, accounting for 30 series of experiments. A microset scaled in mL was used to measure the pump deliveries. Flow profile and reliability of infusion rate were analyzed after repeated use. The mean flow rate in the three series of measurements showed a gradual increase; however, the difference was not statistically significant (5.01 ± 0.07 vs. 5.03 ± 0.06 vs. 5.06 ± 0.08 mL/h; P = 0.81). The percentage of the flow rate error (deviation from 5 mL/h ± 15%) was 100% in the first and second hours of infusion, 96% in the third hour, 60% in the 20th hour and zero percent in the rest of the infusion time. This study indicated that the delivery rate accuracy of elastomeric infusion pumps is preserved after repeated usage. These laboratory findings suggested that elastomeric pumps could be safely refilled in the successive days to provide postoperative analgesia.
    Full-text · Article · May 2014 · Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCCIÓN La Cirugía Ambulatoria ha tenido un importante crecimiento desde la década de los '80, llegando a constituir más del 60% de los procedimientos quirúrgicos realizados en Estados Unidos en el año 2006 1 . La tendencia actual ha ido hacia la cirugía am-bulatoria y la hospitalización abreviada. El uso de técnicas y equipos más sofi sticados ha permitido la realización de procedimientos cada vez más inva-sivos, realizados tradicionalmente en el ambiente hospitalario en forma ambulatoria. Como toda cirugía, los procedimientos quirúr-gicos ambulatorios requieren de anestesia y los principales objetivos de esta son una recuperación rápida, con mínimos efectos secundarios, buen control del dolor postoperatorio, alta precoz y re-ducción de los costos 2 . Desde el punto de vista de la anestesia, esto re-presenta múltiples desafíos. El desarrollo de drogas de acción corta ha posibilitado una rápida recupe-ración postanestésica, la optimización de la analge-sia postoperatoria, con esquemas multimodales, ha permitido el enviar los pacientes a su casa disminu-yendo el riesgo de readmisiones no programadas. Debido a su simpleza y gran aceptación, la anestesia general (AG) ha sido la más ampliamente usada en estos procedimientos. Más aún, con la introducción de nuevos agentes anestésicos de cinética rápida, como propofol o desfl urano, la AG se ha mantenido como la técnica de elección en muchos centros ambulatorios. Si bien las ventajas que plantean los procedi- mientos quirúrgicos ambulatorios son evidentes, aún existen difi cultades en el manejo de náuseas, vómitos y dolor postoperatorio 3 . Varios estudios identifi can a estas como las complicaciones más te-midas por los pacientes al momento de someterse a cirugía, y que en muchas ocasiones retrasan el alta, aumentando las complicaciones postquirúrgicas y los costos 4,5 . En ese contexto, la anestesia y analgesia regio-nal periférica puede ser una alternativa: entregando una analgesia altamente específi ca, disminuyendo la necesidad de anestesia general, la necesidad del uso de opioides para una adecuada analgesia y sus efectos secundarios 6 . La evidencia ha demostrado en numerosos estu-dios que la anestesia regional logra reducir el dolor postoperatorio y post alta; disminuye la necesidad de usar altas dosis de opioides para lograr niveles adecuados de analgesia, minimizando los efectos secundarios propios de estos fármacos; reduce las náuseas y vómitos, que sin tratamiento en la pobla-ción quirúrgica general puede ocurrir en un 20-30% y en los pacientes con alto riesgo pueden llegar has-ta un 80%; fi nalmente aumenta la satisfacción de los pacientes 7 . Debido a esto, paulatinamente más anestesiólo-gos han comenzado a usar técnicas regionales como método anestésico de elección, ya sea en forma única o combinada con otros sistemas de analgesia, para brindar al paciente los mejores resultados lue-go de someterse a procedimientos quirúrgicos de forma ambulatoria. Reportes recientes dan cuenta que durante los últimos 16 años, el empleo de AR se ha incrementado doce veces 8 .
    Full-text · Article ·
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Providing intraarticular analgesia with a continuous infusion of local anesthetic via a disposable infusion pump has gained popularity. Despite the prevalence of this technique, data comparing this method of analgesia to conventional regional anesthesia are not available. We present a prospective study that compared a single-dose interscalene block with a single-dose interscalene block plus continuous intraarticular infusion of local anesthetic. Forty patients scheduled for shoulder arthroscopy were entered in this prospective, double-blinded study. All patients received an interscalene brachial plexus block as their primary anesthetic. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: 1. interscalene block with 1.5% mepivacaine (40 mL) followed by a postoperative intraarticular infusion of 0.5% ropivacaine at 2 mL/h, or 2. interscalene block with 0.5% ropivacaine (40 mL) followed by a postoperative intraarticular infusion of 0.9% saline (placebo) at 2 mL/h. Postoperative infusions were maintained for 48 h. Visual analog scale pain scores and postoperative oxycodone consumption were measured for 48 h. Visual analog scale scores at rest and with ambulation in the Mepivacaine/Intraarticular Ropivacaine group were reduced when compared with the Ropivacaine/Saline group (rest: P = 0.003, ambulation: P = 0.006). Oxycodone consumption was also decreased (28 +/- 21 mg vs 44 +/- 28 mg, P = 0.046), respectively. We conclude that a brachial plexus block with 1.5% mepivacaine and a continuous intraarticular infusion of 0.5% ropivacaine at 2 mL/h provides improved analgesia for minor surgery at 24 and 48 h versus a single-injection interscalene block with 0.5% ropivacaine.
    Preview · Article · Oct 2001 · Anesthesia & Analgesia
Show more