ArticlePDF Available


Domestication entails control of wild species and is generally regarded as a complex process confined to a restricted area and culture. Previous DNA sequence analyses of several domestic species have suggested only a limited number of origination events. We analyzed mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region sequences of 191 domestic horses and found a high diversity of matrilines. Sequence analysis of equids from archaeological sites and late Pleistocene deposits showed that this diversity was not due to an accelerated mutation rate or an ancient domestication event. Consequently, high mtDNA sequence diversity of horses implies an unprecedented and widespread integration of matrilines and an extensive utilization and taming of wild horses. However, genetic variation at nuclear markers is partitioned among horse breeds and may reflect sex-biased dispersal and breeding.
DOI: 10.1126/science.291.5503.474
, 474 (2001); 291Science
et al.Carles Vilà,
Widespread Origins of Domestic Horse Lineages (this information is current as of September 22, 2008 ):
The following resources related to this article are available online at
version of this article at:
including high-resolution figures, can be found in the onlineUpdated information and services,
found at:
can berelated to this articleA list of selected additional articles on the Science Web sites
, 8 of which can be accessed for free: cites 21 articlesThis article
99 article(s) on the ISI Web of Science. cited byThis article has been
15 articles hosted by HighWire Press; see: cited byThis article has been
: subject collectionsThis article appears in the following
in whole or in part can be found at: this article
permission to reproduce of this article or about obtaining reprintsInformation about obtaining
registered trademark of AAAS.
is aScience2001 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science; all rights reserved. The title
CopyrightAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005.
(print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published weekly, except the last week in December, by theScience
on September 22, 2008 www.sciencemag.orgDownloaded from
19. B. J. Finlayson-Pitts, J. N. Pitts, Chemistry of the Upper
and Lower Atmosphere—Theory, Experiments, and
Applications (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2000).
20. J. F. Hopper, W. Hart, J. Geophys. Res. 99, 25315
21. U. K. Kla¨ning, T. Wolff, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem.
89, 243 (1985).
22. Some indirect light (twilight) is present at midday
before 2 March, and even earlier further to the south,
so the Br
and BrCl increases on day 60 to 61 could
be photoinitiated.
23. K. W. Oum, M. J. Lakin, B. J. Finlayson-Pitts, Geophys.
Res. Lett. 25, 3923 (1998).
24. J. P. D. Abbatt, G. C. G. Waschewsky, J. Phys. Chem.
A 102, 3719 (1998).
25. R. Sander, P. J. Crutzen, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 9121
26. B. A. Michalowski et al., J. Geophys. Res. 105, 15131
27. T. X. Wang, D. W. Margerum, Inorg. Chem. 33, 1050
28. T. Koop, A. Kapilashrami, L. T. Molina, M. J. Molina, J.
Geophys. Res. 105, 26393 (2000).
29. S. Ghosal, A. Shbeeb, J. C. Hemminger, Geophys Res.
Lett. 27, 1879 (2000).
30. E. M. Knipping et al., Science 288, 301 (2000).
31. D. Toom-Sauntry, L. A. Barrie, J. Geophys. Res.,in
32. P. B. Shepson and D. Toom-Sauntry, unpublished
33. W. P. Bartlett, D. W. Margerum, Environ. Sci. Technol.
33, 3410 (1999).
34. J. J. Orlando, B. Ramacher, G. Tyndall, Geophys. Res.
Lett. 27, 2633 (2000).
35. C. W. Spicer et al., Nature 394, 353 (1998).
36. R. R. Dickerson et al., J. Geophys. Res. 104, 21385
37. C. W. Spicer, D. V. Kenny, W. J. Shaw, K. M. Busness,
E. G. Chapman, Environ. Sci. Technol. 28, 412A
38. We are grateful to the Department of Energy’s Atmo-
spheric Chemistry Program, and particularly P. Lunn, for
support of this work; the Meteorological Service of
Canada for providing transport to Alert and housing
during the study; and the personnel of Canadian Forces
Station Alert for logistical support. We are especially
grateful for the on-site support provided by A. Gallant
and P. Brickell, organizational support and comments on
the manuscript by L. Barrie, use of a snow probe devel-
oped by A. L. Sumner, and ozone calibrations provided
by K. Anlauf. We also thank J. N. Pitts Jr., J. C. Hem-
minger, P. Jungwirth, D. Tobias, and R. B. Gerber for
helpful discussions and M. J. Molina for providing pre-
prints before publication.
29 August 2000; accepted 6 December 2000
Widespread Origins of
Domestic Horse Lineages
Carles Vila`,
* Jennifer A. Leonard,
Anders Go¨therstro¨m,
Stefan Marklund,
Kaj Sandberg,
Kerstin Lide´n,
Robert K. Wayne,
Hans Ellegren
Domestication entails control of wild species and is generally regarded as a
complex process confined to a restricted area and culture. Previous DNA se-
quence analyses of several domestic species have suggested only a limited
number of origination events. We analyzed mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) con-
trol region sequences of 191 domestic horses and found a high diversity of
matrilines. Sequence analysis of equids from archaeological sites and late
Pleistocene deposits showed that this diversity was not due to an accelerated
mutation rate or an ancient domestication event. Consequently, high mtDNA
sequence diversity of horses implies an unprecedented and widespread inte-
gration of matrilines and an extensive utilization and taming of wild horses.
However, genetic variation at nuclear markers is partitioned among horse
breeds and may reflect sex-biased dispersal and breeding.
The domestication of the horse has profoundly
affected the course of civilization. Horses pro-
vided meat, milk, and enhanced transportation
and warfare capabilities that led to the spread of
Indo-European languages and culture and the
collapse of ancient societies (1, 2). Horse re-
mains become increasingly common in archae-
ological sites of the Eurasian grassland steppe
dating from about 6000 years ago, suggesting
the time and place of their first domestication
(3–5). Two alternative hypotheses for the origin
of the domestic horse from wild populations
can be formulated. A restricted origin hypoth-
esis postulates that the domestic horse was de-
veloped through selective breeding of a limited
wild stock from a few foci of domestication.
Thereafter, domestic horses would have been
distributed to other regions. Under this hypoth-
esis, domestication is a complex and improba-
ble process requiring multigeneration selection
on traits that permit stable coexistence with
humans. Another alternative could be that
domestication involved a large number of
founders recruited over an extended time period
from throughout the extensive Eurasian range
of the horse. In this multiple origins scenario,
horses may have been independently captured
from diverse wild populations and then increas-
ingly bred in captivity as wild numbers dwin-
dled. Consequently, early domestic horses may
not represent a stock highly modified by selec-
tive breeding.
These two hypotheses for the origin of the
domestic horse make distinct predictions with
regard to genetic variation in maternally in-
herited mtDNA. The restricted origin hypoth-
esis predicts that mitochondrial diversity of
the horse should be limited to a few founding
lineages and those added subsequently by
mutation. In contrast, a multiple origins hy-
pothesis predicts diversity greater than that
typically found in a single wild population
and divergence among lineages that well pre-
cedes the first evidence of domestication.
Phylogenetic analysis of 37 different
mtDNA control region sequences from domes-
tic horses deposited in GenBank, 616 base pairs
(bp) in length (6), revealed at least six divergent
sequence clades (clades A to F, Fig. 1A). After
correcting for multiple hits and ignoring indels,
the mean divergence observed between se-
quences was 2.6% (range: 0.2 to 5%). The
average divergence between donkey (Equus
asinus) and horses was 16.1% (range: 14.3 to
19.1%). Assuming that horses diverged from
the lineage leading to extant stenoid equids
(zebras and asses) at least 2 million years ago
(Ma), as the fossil record suggests (7), or about
3.9 Ma, according to molecular data (8), we can
estimate an average rate of equid mtDNA se-
quence divergence of 4.1% or 8.1% per million
years. Therefore, modern horse lineages coa-
lesce at about 0.32 or 0.63 Ma, long before the
first domestic horses appear in the archaeolog-
ical record (4). Even clade D, having a more
recent coalescence time, has a mean sequence
divergence of 0.8% (range: 0.2 to 2.0%), which
predicts an origin at least 0.1 Ma. These results
show that domestic horse lineages have an an-
cient origin. Thus, given the 6000-year origin
suggested by the archaeological record, numer-
ous matrilines must have been incorporated into
the gene pool of the domestic horse.
To expand the representation of modern and
ancient breeds, we sequenced 355 bp of the left
domain of the mtDNA control region in 191
horses from 10 distinct breeds (9), including
some that are very old such as the Icelandic
pony, Swedish Gotland Russ, and British Ex-
moor pony. A Przewalski’s horse was also se-
quenced. We found 32 different sequences, and
a search of GenBank provided 38 additional
haplotypes for the same region. We compared
all these sequences with those obtained from
DNA isolated from long bone remains of eight
horses preserved frozen in Alaskan permafrost
deposits from a locality near Fairbanks, Alaska,
dated 12,000 to 28,000 years ago (10, 11).
Additionally, we sequenced DNA of eight
Department of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala Uni-
versity, Norbyva¨gen 18D, S-75236 Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Organismic Biology, Ecology and Evo-
lution, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
90095–1606, USA.
Archeological Research Laborato-
ry, Stockholm University, S-10691 Stockholm, Swe-
Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics,
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-75007
Uppsala, Sweden.
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-
19 JANUARY 2001 VOL 291 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org474
on September 22, 2008 www.sciencemag.orgDownloaded from
horse remains from archaeological sites in
southern Sweden and Estonia, dated to 1000 to
2000 years ago (11).
The additional sequences affirm the ancient
and diverse origin of domestic horse mtDNA
lineages (Fig. 1B). Six of eight permafrost se-
quences cluster in a group ancestral to modern
sequences (Pleist2, Pleist3, Pleist4, Pleist6,
Pleist7, and Pleist8), possibly representing a
sister taxon of the domestic horse or a lineage
not present in modern domestic horses (Fig.
1B) (12). However, the other two permafrost
sequences cluster with those of clade C (Pleist1
and Pleist5). These sequences differ by as little
as 1.2% from modern counterparts. Similarly,
four complete and four incomplete sequences
found in archaeological remains are distributed
throughout the tree defined by modern horse
sequences and are closely related to them (Fig.
1B). Finally, in the most primitive (4) and
chromosomally distinct horse (13), the Prze-
walski’s horse, only a single haplotype has been
found [EC13B, Fig. 1B; cf. (14 )]. The low
variability of the Przewalski’s horse is not un-
expected because the captive population was
founded from only 13 individuals (14 ). This
haplotype is not directly ancestral to any se-
quence cluster. Therefore, because sequences
from ancient specimens and Przewalski’s hors-
es are very similar to those in modern horses,
our results contradict the possibility that a high
mutation rate explains the haplotype diversity
observed in modern horses. Moreover, modern
horse sequences do not define monophyletic
groups with respect to wild progenitors, as
would be expected if they were founded from a
limited wild stock (15–17). The lack of well-
supported phylogenetic clades and the presence
of numerous matrilines whose divergence ex-
Fig. 1. Mitochondrial control
region sequence trees. (A)
Neighbor-joining tree of
modern horse haplotypes
based on 616 bp of mito-
chondrial control region se-
quence. Letters A to F indi-
cate sequence clades consis-
tently supported with differ-
ent tree-building methods.
Support values are indicated
at nodes when found in at
least 50% of 1000 bootstrap
neighbor-joining trees, in a
consensus tree of 1000 steps
based on the quartet puz-
zling algorithm, and in a 50%
majority rule consensus tree
of 26,113 most parsimoni-
ous trees. (B) Neighbor-join-
ing tree of modern and an-
cient horse haplotypes based
on 355 bp of control region
sequence. Bootstrap support
is indicated at nodes if found
in more than 50% of 1000
bootstrap trees. Letters A to
F correspond to sequence
clades in (A). The sequence
identification codes refer to
GenBank accession numbers,
except for the sequences ob-
tained in this study. Modern
horses are indicated with the
prefix EC, late Pleistocene
sequences from permafrost
deposits near Fairbanks,
Alaska, with a dot and the
prefix Pleist, and archaeolog-
ical sequences from northern
Europe with a triangle and
the prefix Anc. The sequence
obtained from Przewalski’s
horses is indicated with an
asterisk. For some archaeo-
logical samples, only partial
sequences were obtained:
Anc4, 262 bp were se-
quenced, most similar to se-
quences in clade C; Anc5,
241 bp, identical to sequenc-
es related to clade B; Anc7,
259 bp, identical to sequenc-
es in clade A; and Anc8, 223
bp, most similar to sequenc-
es in clade A.
on September 22, 2008 www.sciencemag.orgDownloaded from
ceeds that between late Pleistocene and modern
sequences suggest a massive and unprecedent-
ed retention of ancestral matrilines. The obser-
vation that the sequences obtained from the late
Pleistocene Alaskan horses cluster in two dis-
crete groups indicates that the diversity of
mtDNA lineages in single natural populations
might have been limited. Consequently, the
high diversity of matrilines observed among
modern horses suggests the utilization of wild
horses from a large number of populations as
founders of the domestic horse. A single geo-
graphically restricted population would not suf-
fice as founding stock.
Although the initial founding of the domes-
tic horse involved incorporation of multiple ma-
trilines, the development of phenotypically dis-
tinct breeds may be a different process charac-
terized by a limited founding stock and restrict-
ed breeding (18). Consistent with limited
genetic exchange among breeds, we found that
haplotype frequencies differed significantly in
all but one of 45 pairwise breed comparisons
(exact test, P 0.05) (19). However, the se-
quences found in the 10 sampled modern and
ancient breeds never defined monophyletic
groups as might be expected if they were de-
rived from a limited founding stock (Fig. 2A).
Additionally, genetic diversity within breeds is
high; on average, 7.4 haplotypes occurred per
breed (range: 3 to 9), and the nucleotide diver-
sity per breed averaged 0.022 (range: 0.012 to
0.027), comparable to that found in large wild
ungulate populations (20). Moreover, genetic
diversity within breeds is not a recent phenom-
enon, because Viking Age horse bones 1000 to
2000 years old and from a restricted area in
northern Europe also show a diversity of control
region lineages (Fig. 1B). The high haplotypic
diversity of ancient horse breeds and of a Viking
Age population suggests that domestic horse
populations were founded by a diversity of ma-
trilines that, as suggested by the archaeological
record, was augmented by trade (21, 22).
High levels of mtDNA variation within
and between horse breeds may reflect a bias
toward females in breeding and trade. Con-
sequently, we assessed variation in 15 hyper-
variable, biparentally inherited, microsatellite
loci (23–27 ). The observed microsatellite
heterozygosity was moderately high for all
breeds, varying from 49.4% 5.7% to
62.6% 5.8%, and the mean number of
alleles per locus varied from 3.6 0.3 to
4.5 0.4. Allele frequencies differed signif-
icantly between breeds (exact test, P 0.01).
The microsatellite divergence between breeds
was more marked than observed with
mtDNA sequences. Individuals from the
same breed generally clustered together in a
neighbor-joining tree based on allele sharing
distance (Fig. 2B), and 95% of individuals
could be classified correctly to breed with an
assignment test (28). These results show that
maternal gene flow has dominated the genetic
exchange between breeds and/or that female
effective population size within breeds is
larger than that of males. A sex bias in an-
cient breeding is consistent with modern
Fig. 2. Genetic diversity in horse breeds. (A) Distribution of haplotypes
found in 10 horse breeds and in horses of the Orient from GenBank. This
distribution is superimposed on a neighbor-joining tree of modern horse
haplotypes based on the same 355 bp of the control region sequence, as
in Fig. 1B. Each one of the observed haplotypes is indicated by a colored
symbol corresponding to its position in the relationship tree. (B) Un-
rooted neighbor-joining tree of horses from 10 breeds as in (A) based on
the proportion of shared alleles between individuals.
19 JANUARY 2001 VOL 291 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org476
on September 22, 2008 www.sciencemag.orgDownloaded from
breeding practices in which select breeding
males are used as stud for 15 to 20 or more
females (29).
Wild horses were widely distributed
throughout the Eurasian steppe during the Up-
per Paleolithic [35,000 to 10,000 years before
present (B.P.)], but in many regions, they dis-
appeared from the fossil record about 10,000
years ago (3, 4). Horse remains became in-
creasingly frequent in archaeological sites of
southern Ukraine and Kazakhstan starting
about 6000 years ago, where limited evidence
from bit wear on teeth suggests that some hors-
es could have been ridden (29, 30). By the
beginning of the Iron Age, wild horse popula-
tions had declined, and today, only one putative
wild population, the Przewalski’s horse, re-
mains (4). Therefore, a scenario consistent with
the archaeological record and genetic results
posits that, initially, wild horses were captured
over a large geographic area and used for nu-
trition and transport. As wild populations dwin-
dled because of exploitation or environmental
changes (31), increased emphasis was placed
on captive breeding, allowing for multiple ma-
trilines of a single ancestral species to be inte-
grated into the gene pool of domestic horses.
This contrasts with previous notions of domes-
tication as a complex multigeneration process
that begins with relatively few individuals se-
lected for behavioral characteristics, such as
docility and sedentary habits, as a prerequisite
to coexistence with humans.
Domestic species such as dogs, cattle,
sheep, and goats were established several thou-
sand years before the horse was domesticated
(4). The geographic spread of these species was
a likely result of their expansion from a limited
number of domestication centers. In the horse,
the extensive and unparalleled retention of an-
cestral matrilines suggests that widespread uti-
lization occurred primarily through the transfer
of technology for capturing, taming, and rearing
wild caught animals (29, 30). In contrast, the
export of domesticated horses from a geograph-
ically restricted center of origin would have
resulted in a more limited diversity of matri-
lines. Consequently, in the history of the do-
mestic horse, transfer of technology rather than
selective breeding may have been the critical
innovation leading to their widespread utiliza-
tion. Moreover, the high value of horses in
primitive societies (1, 2) placed a premium on
the rapid acquisition of this technology from
neighboring communities.
References and Notes
1. D. W. Anthony, Curr. Anthropol. 27, 291 (1986).
2. J. M. Diamond, Nature 350, 275 (1991).
3. D. W. Anthony, in Horses Through Time, S. L. Olsen,
Ed. (Roberts Rinehart for Carnegie Museum of Natu-
ral History, Boulder, CO, 1996), pp. 57–82.
4. J. Clutton-Brock, A Natural History of Domesticated
Mammals (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, ed. 2,
5. D. Bennett, R. S. Hoffmann, Mamm. Species 628,1
6. Maximum likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum
parsimony phylogenetic trees were constructed with
the program PAUP* (32). To select the model of DNA
substitution that best fit the data for neighbor-
joining analysis, we used a hierarchical likelihood
ratio test approach implemented in the program
MODELTEST 3.0 (33). A Tamura and Nei (34) model
was selected, assuming a proportion of invariable
sites of 0.52 and a gamma rate heterogeneity of 0.76.
Gene and nucleotide diversity measures for each
breed, as well as overall and interbreed pairwise
differentiation tests, were conducted with the pro-
gram Arlequin 1.1 (35).
7. A. Forste´n, Ann. Zool. Fenn. 28, 301 (1992).
8. M. George, O. A. Ryder, Mol. Biol. Evol. 3, 535 (1986).
9. Blood samples were extracted from 191 horses from
10 breeds: Arabian (sample size, n 20), Connemara
(16), Exmoor (19), Fjord (16), Gotland Russ (20),
Icelandic pony (20), Shetland (20), Standardbred (20),
Swedish Ardennes (20), and Thoroughbred (20).
Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood sam-
ples after digestion with proteinase K and separation
with organic solvents. Amplification of the mtDNA
control region (from the tRNA-proline region to the
central domain) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
followed by analysis of single-strand conformation
polymorphism (SSCP) was performed according to
Marklund et al. (36). Direct sequencing of PCR prod-
ucts representing different SSCP variants was carried
out with dye terminator chemistry on an ABI 377
instrument (Perkin-Elmer).
10. J. A. Leonard, R. K. Wayne, A. Cooper, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 1651 (2000).
11. DNA was amplified successfully from eight permafrost-
preserved bones from the American Museum of Natural
History (FAM numbers are collection numbers): Pleist1,
FAM 4695; Pleist2, FAM 4305; Pleist3, FAM 6735;
Pleist4, FAM 6206; Pleist5, FAM 133514; Pleist6, FAM
6300; Pleist7, FAM 6171; and Pleist8, FAM 6282. All
these samples were obtained from metapodials, origi-
nated from the Fairbanks area, Alaska, and were carbon-
dated to the late Pleistocene (12,000 to 28,000 years
B.P.). DNA also was extracted from eight horse bones
from archaeological sites in southern Sweden (from the
Historical Museum in Stockholm) and Estonia (provided
by L. Luoˆgas) dating to 1000 to 2000 years ago: Anc1,
SK1, tooth from sacrifice in Skedemosse (bog) in O
Sweden, 200 to 500 A.D.; Anc2, SK2, tooth from sacri-
fice in Skedemosse in O
land, Sweden, 200 to 500 A.D.;
Anc3, VenA9, tooth, from Vendel grave 9 in Uppland,
Sweden, Viking Age; Anc4, A17, tooth, from Alsike grave
9 in Uppland, Sweden, Viking Age; Anc5, Bi842, tooth,
from Birka grave 842 in Uppland, Sweden, Viking Age;
Anc6, HALLA, tooth, from Broa i Hall in Gotland, Swe-
den, Late Viking Age; Anc7, EstP61, tooth, from Pada,
Estonia, Late Iron Age; and Anc8, EstP66, tooth, from
Pada, Estonia, Late Iron Age. Extractions were done in
laboratories exclusively devoted to the analysis of an-
cient DNA to avoid cross-contamination of samples.
Permafrost samples were extracted in Los Angeles [see
(10)] and archaeological samples in Stockholm. Three
sets of primers amplifying fragments of about 160 bp
were designed to amplify the same region as above: pair
GATG. No recent horse samples were amplified in lab-
oratories that extracted the ancient samples. We se-
quenced DNA from multiple extractions and indepen-
dent PCR amplifications to confirm the authenticity of
DNA sequences. Three overlapping fragments were se-
quenced for each specimen, and overlapping portions
were always identical. The poor preservation of DNA in
ancient samples and the high copy number of mtDNA
in the cell imply that nuclear inserts, if they exist, are
unlikely to be amplified (37). None of the ancient or
recent samples showed evidence of superimposed se-
quences, and replications always gave identical results.
Sequences have been deposited in GenBank (accession
numbers AF326635 to AF326686).
12. M. C. Winans, in The Evolution of Perissodactyls,D.R.
Prothero, R. M. Schoch, Eds. (Oxford Univ. Press, New
York, 1989), pp. 262–297.
13. K. Benirschke, N. Malouf, R. J. Low, H. Heck, Science
148, 382 (1965).
14. E. A. Oakenfull, O. A. Ryder, Anim. Genet. 29, 456
15. C. Vila` et al., Science 276, 1687 (1997).
16. H. Mannen, S. Tsuji, R. T. Loftus, D. G. Bradley,
Genetics 150, 1169 (1998).
17. E. Giuffra et al., Genetics 154, 1785 (2000).
18. F. E. Zeuner, A History of Domesticated Animals
(Harper & Row, New York, 1963).
19. M. Raymond, F. Rousset, Evolution 49, 1280 (1995).
20. P. Arctander, P. W. Kat, B. T. Simonsen, H. R. Siegis-
mund, in Molecular Genetic Approaches in Conserva-
tion, T. B. Smith, R. K. Wayne, Eds. (Oxford Univ.
Press, New York, 1996), pp. 399 412.
21. U. E. Hagberg, The Archeology of Skedemosse II
(KVAA 46, Almquist & Wiksell Intl, Stockholm, 1967).
22. H. Braathen, Ryttergraver: Politiska Strukturer i Eldre
Rikssamlingstid (VARIA 19, Universitetets Old-
sakssamling, Oslo, 1989).
23. H. Ellegren, M. Johansson, K. Sandberg, L. Andersson,
Anim. Genet. 23, 133 (1992).
24. G. Guerin, M. Bertaud, Y. Amigues, Anim. Genet. 25,
62 (1994).
25. S. Marklund, H. Ellegren, S. Eriksson, K. Sandberg, L.
Andersson, Anim. Genet. 25, 19 (1994).
26. L. Coogle, R. Reid, E. Bailey, Anim. Genet. 28, 309
27. Fifteen microsatellite loci were genotyped from the
blood samples: HMS1, HMS3, HMS5, HMS6, HMS7,
HTG6, HTG8, HTG10, HTG14, HTG15, LE034, LE037,
LE038, LE039, and LE040 (23–26). PCR products were
radiolabeled with
P and were separated in 6%
polyacrylamide gels and visualized by autoradiogra-
phy. Known size standards were included at regular
intervals on the gels. PCR conditions and profiles are
available upon request. All breeds were polymorphic
for all loci except four that were monomorphic for
locus LE039, for which only two alleles were observed
(one with an overall frequency of 92%). Measures of
genetic diversity and exact tests of genic differenti-
ation were done with the program GENEPOP 3.1b
(38). An assignment test that uses likelihood ratios to
assign individuals to breeds according to their allelic
composition was used to assess differentiation (28).
We used the distance d
1 P
, where P
is the
proportion of shared alleles between individuals i and
j, to construct a neighbor-joining tree of individuals.
28. D. Paetkau, W. Calbert, I. Stirling, C. Strobeck, Mol.
Ecol. 4, 347 (1995).
29. M. A. Levine, J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 18, 29 (1999).
30. D. W. Anthony, D. R. Brown, Antiquity 65, 22 (1991).
31. S. L. Olsen, in Horses Through Time, S. L. Olsen, Ed.
(Roberts Rinehart for Carnegie Museum of Natural
History, Boulder, CO, 1996), pp. 35–56.
32. D. L. Swofford, PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using
Parsimony and Other Methods (Sinauer, Sunderland,
MA, 1998).
33. D. Posada, K. A. Crandall, Bioinformatics 14, 817
34. K. Tamura, M. Nei, Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 512 (1993).
35. S. Schneider, J.-M. Kueffer, D. Roessli, L. Excoffier,
Arlequin ver. 1.1: A Software for Population Genetic
Data Analysis (Genetics and Biometry Laboratory,
University of Geneva, Switzerland, 1997).
36. S. Marklund, R. Chaudhary, L. Marklund, K. Sandberg,
L. Andersson, Anim. Genet. 26, 193 (1995).
37. R. K. Wayne, J. A. Leonard, A. Cooper, Annu. Rev. Ecol.
Syst. 30, 457 (1999).
38. M. Raymond, F. Rousset, J. Hered. 83, 248 (1995).
39. Supported by the Swedish Research Council for Ag-
riculture and Forestry, the Swedish Royal Academy of
Sciences, the NSF, and the Bank of Sweden Tercen-
tenniary Foundation. We thank the American Muse-
um of Natural History in New York and the Historical
Museum in Stockholm for permission to sample their
collections; L. Luoˆgas for providing archaeological
horse samples from Estonia; H. Persson for assisting
in the microsatellite typing; and J. Diamond, B. Van
Valkenburgh, M. Kohn, and K.-P. Koepfli for com-
menting on the manuscript.
12 October 2000; accepted 13 December 2000
on September 22, 2008 www.sciencemag.orgDownloaded from

Supplementary resources (52)

... The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." targeted small portions of the mitochondrion, focusing particularly on clarifying the early phylogenetic history of horse domestication [20][21][22][23]. These studies revealed a weak geographic structure among mitochondrial haplogroups, the highest diversity of which are found in Asian horses, and also show that European and Middle Eastern horses lack genetic representation of the most ancestral lineages, suggesting an Asian origin [23]. ...
... Bootstrap support is on the nodes (10,000 iterations). Letters on the right correspond to the equine haplogroups defined by Achilli et al. [22]. (TIF) S1 Table. ...
... Samples from GenBank that were included in the phylogeographic analysis. Except for NC001788 (Equus asinus) all are published in Achilli et al. [22]. (DOCX) S1 File. ...
Full-text available
Unlike other European domesticates introduced in the Americas after the European invasion, equids (Equidae) were previously in the Western Hemisphere but were extinct by the late Holocene era. The return of equids to the Americas through the introduction of the domestic horse ( Equus caballus ) is documented in the historical literature but is not explored fully either archaeologically or genetically. Historical documents suggest that the first domestic horses were brought from the Iberian Peninsula to the Caribbean in the late 15 th century CE, but archaeological remains of these early introductions are rare. This paper presents the mitochondrial genome of a late 16 th century horse from the Spanish colonial site of Puerto Real (northern Haiti). It represents the earliest complete mitogenome of a post-Columbian domestic horse in the Western Hemisphere offering a unique opportunity to clarify the phylogeographic history of this species in the Americas. Our data supports the hypothesis of an Iberian origin for this early translocated individual and clarifies its phylogenetic relationship with modern breeds in the Americas.
... Methodological and bioinformatics tools have recently been developed, allowing for increased accuracy in the analysis of high-throughput genomes, and over last decades, the equine research community has aimed to reconstruct the evolutionary paths that can still be detected in their genomes [8]. Genetic evidence has pinpointed multiple horse domestication events occurring across Eurasia 5000-6000 years ago [2,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. After this evidence emerged, the history of the horse domestication process was revised. ...
... In contrast to the high mtDNA variability reported in previous studies [2,8,9,115,116], which was already present immediately after their domestication [17,19,117], the Y chromosome shows a very low level of genetic polymorphism in modern horse populations [91,118]. Despite a large diversity of domestic male founders contributing to their early domestication [117], the Y chromosome variability considerably decreased in the last 200 years because of selective pressures and the reduction in the stallion population size operated by breeders [19]. ...
Full-text available
The present equine genetic variation mirrors the deep influence of intensive breeding programs during the last 200 years. Here, we provide a comprehensive current state of knowledge on the trends and prospects on the variation in the equine male-specific region of the Y chromosome (MSY), which was assembled for the first time in 2018. In comparison with the other 12 mammalian species, horses are now the most represented, with 56 documented MSY genes. However, in contrast to the high variability in mitochondrial DNA observed in many horse breeds from different geographic areas, modern horse populations demonstrate extremely low genetic Y-chromosome diversity. The selective pressures employed by breeders using pedigree data (which are not always error-free) as a predictive tool represent the main cause of this lack of variation in the Y-chromosome. Nevertheless, the detailed phylogenies obtained by recent fine-scaled Y-chromosomal genotyping in many horse breeds worldwide have contributed to addressing the genealogical, forensic, and population questions leading to the reappraisal of the Y-chromosome as a powerful genetic marker to avoid the loss of biodiversity as a result of selective breeding practices, and to better understand the historical development of horse breeds.
... However, archaeological data are fragmented, and many characteristic differences may have already existed between domesticated animals and their wild ancestors in the early domestication phase, including coat color, temperament, and reproductive ability, which cannot be discovered through skeletal archaeology. The other method analyzes the genome of modern domesticated animals to obtain temporal and geographic information on domestication and to discover the genetic basis of domestication (Luikart et al., 2001;Vilà et al., 2001;Pedrosa et al., 2005;Naderi et al., 2008), including inferring the initial domestication centers based on the genetic diversity generated by geographical differences. A large amount of phenotypic diversity exists among and within species of modern domesticated animals, and genomic analysis can reveal the influence of specific loci on phenotypes, including coat color, body size, fat content, biological clock, and behavior (Wright, 2015). ...
Full-text available
Background: The domestication of horses has played critical roles in human civilizations. The excavation of ancient horse DNA provides crucial data for studying horse domestication. Studies of horse domestication can shed light on the general mechanisms of animal domestication. Objective: We wish to explore the gene transcription regulation by long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) that influence horse domestication. Methods: First, we assembled the ancient DNA sequences of multiple horses at different times and the genomes of horses, donkeys, and Przewalski horses. Second, we extracted sequences of lncRNA genes shared in ancient horses and sequences of lncRNA genes and the promoter regions of domestication-critical genes shared in modern horses, modern donkeys, and Przewalski horses to form two sample groups. Third, we used the LongTarget program to predict potential regulatory interactions between these lncRNAs and these domestication-critical genes and analyzed the differences between the regulation in ancient/modern horses and between horses/donkeys/Przewalski horses. Fourth, we performed functional enrichment analyses of genes that exhibit differences in epigenetic regulation. Results: First, genes associated with neural crest development and domestication syndrome are important targets of lncRNAs. Second, compared with undomesticated Przewalski horses, more lncRNAs participate in the epigenetic regulation in modern horses and donkeys, suggesting that domestication is linked to more epigenetic regulatory changes. Third, lncRNAs’ potential target genes in modern horses are mainly involved in two functional areas: 1) the nervous system, behavior, and cognition, and 2) muscle, body size, cardiac function, and metabolism. Conclusion: Domestication is linked to substantial epigenetic regulatory changes. Genes associated with neural crest development and domestication syndrome underwent noticeable lncRNA-mediated epigenetic regulation changes during horse domestication.
... Among the segregating sites, we also identified four mutational hotspots previously described located at positions 15585, 15597, 15650, and 15659 [29], and these positions were not included in phylogenetic analysis (Table 2A,B). ...
Full-text available
The Polish draft horse (PDH) breed is a result of crossing local mares with imported cold-blooded stallions. In this study, we investigate the genetic composition of the PDH by analyzing whole mitochondrial d-loop variabilities and comparing these variabilities to previously demonstrated whole d-loop sequences of other cold-blooded breeds: Ardennais, Belgian, Breton, Clydesdale, Noriker, Norwegian Fjord, Percheron, and Suffolk. Our results show high nucleotide diversity among the PDH population and the existence of two main haplogroups with strong kinship to the Belgian breed.
... In addition to archaeological records, one approach used to document the domestication process was genetic data obtained from modern domestic animals (Vilà et al., 2001, Larson et al., 2005. The objective is both the reconstitution of the geographical and temporal origins of the animal and the discovery of the genetic basis underlying domestic traits. ...
The emergence of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in the early 2000s was one of the milestones in the recent history of research. This technology revolutionised not only the world of molecular biology but also that of science in general, allowing advances in both archaeology and cancerology. Using ultra-high-throughput DNA sequencing technology, researchers have characterised thousands of ancient genomes to date, including some now extinct lines. This major technological breakthrough has also revealed that beyond the genome sequences themselves, it is possible to recover ancient epigenetic marks from DNA traces preserved in archaeological material. This made it possible to consider studying the potential evolution of epigenetic modifications carried by individuals who have gone through significant changes in their living conditions, such as domestication for animals. As part of this PhD, we wanted to assess and help resolve some of the various technological and methodological obstacles that make producing reliable estimates of ancient epigenetic marks particularly difficult. Among the various epigenetic marks accessible by ancient DNA, we have only focused on the methylation of DNA present at the level of CpG dinucleotides. The methods developed have enabled us to tackle the question of the epigenetic modifications that have accompanied the domestication of the horse from its origins, around 5,500 years ago, to the present day, a period during which several hundred distinct breeds have been developed. While helping to improve certain aspects of epigenetic inference from ancient data, our work nonetheless revealed significant experimental and analytical limitations. Current procedures for analysing modern epigenetic data are unfortunately not always compatible with the use of ancient data. In addition, this thesis work has provided several avenues for future improvements concerning our ability to manipulate ancient DNA molecules and obtain more reliable alignments on the reference genomes.
This datasheet on Equus caballus [ISC] covers Identity, Overview, Distribution, Dispersal, Diagnosis, Biology & Ecology, Environmental Requirements, Natural Enemies, Impacts, Uses, Prevention/Control, Further Information.
Full-text available
Kurdish horse is one of the most valuable horse genetic resources in the Middle East. To assess the genetic diversity of Kurdish horses, Mitochondrial DNA D‐loop hyper‐variable region1 (HVR1) was sequenced in 29 non‐related Kurdish horses which were sampled from diverse geographic regions of Iran. Total DNA was extracted from the collected blood samples by modified salting out method. The HVR1 was amplified by PCR and then sequenced using ABI PRISM BigDyeTM Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit. Consequently, the sequences were trimmed to 294 bp using BIOEDIT to become comparable with other reported HVR1 sequences in GeneBank. Sequence alignment was performed using CLUSTALW package. Haplotype and nucleotide diversity were estimated using DNASP5.10 and phylogenetic tree was constructed by neighbour joining method. Fourteen different haplotypes and 22 polymorphic sites were detected. Haplotype diversity, nucleotide diversity and Tajima D values were 0.901 ± 0.001, 0.01153 ± 0.0020 and −1.378, respectively. Kurdish horse showed a high haplotype and low nucleotide diversity. The compositional frequency of consensus sequences for base A was the highest (29.93%) compared to other three nucleotides (C = 28.91%, T = 26.53% and G = 14.63%). As expected, all of the detected Kurdish horse haplotypes belonged to haplogroup K (i.e., Kurdish horses). According to the phylogenetic analysis, Kurdish horses were genetically more closely related to Tibetan, Chinese, Bulgarian and Iranian native horse breeds, compared to other Asian horse breeds, but some traces of European horse breeds were detected in their maternal lines. Mitochondrial DNA D‐loop hyper‐variable region 1 (HVR1) variability in Kurdish horse breed Milad Nikbakhsh, Sheida Varkoohi* and Hamid Reza Seyedabadi Kurdish horse is one of the most valuable horse breed in the Middle East. Kurdish horse has high haplotype and low nucleotide diversity and its haplotypes were belonged to haplogroup K. This breed was genetically more closely related to Tibetan, Chinese, Bulgarian and Iranian native horse breeds, also some traces of European horse breeds were detected in their maternal lines.
Full-text available
The notion of ethics undoubtedly plays an important role in our society. It evolves and differs according to the sensitivity of the environment, but doesn’t bringing together virtuous principles aimed at an ideal and absolute harmony, which we know is impossible to achieve. Even so, it behoves us – and it is our moral responsibility – to question the choices we make through our freedom to do right or wrong. Moreover, legal rules evolve along with the mores of a society and do not, themselves, have a moral character. Should we therefore only apply the laws of the moment and consider that anything that is not forbidden remains implicitly allowed? Or, on the contrary, are we capable of going beyond mere legality and asking ourselves: if we want to do what’s right, or avoid doing what’s wrong, how can we adjust our behaviour? If we know what consequences a decision may have on the interests of those around us (humans and equids), what should we do or not do? Is it worse to not do what we should do, compared to doing what we should not? The Swiss Horse Industry Council and Administration, COFICHEV (formerly the Swiss Horse Industry Administration, OFiChev), instigated a discussion concerning the most essential ethical requirements. These discussions led to the realisa-tion that there was a significant need for information and communication on such topics. For this reason, the COFICHEV analysed a number of current ethical issues and published an initial status overview as well as future perspectives (Poncet et al, 2011a, 2011b). Ten years later, that report has now been updated, taking into account the most recent relevant scientific publications (Poncet et al, 2022). This Summary Report covers the full text’s structure and its most notable points. Readers interested in more in-depth knowledge may consult the full version and delve into the details of the conclusions and recommendations. There, they will also find all necessary bibliographical references for understanding these complex subjects, as well as illustrations. In general, the editors use the term “horse” to refer to the various breeds and types of domestic horses and ponies belong-ing to the species Equus caballus. The terms equids and equine refer to all modern, domestic members of the genus Equus, including horses, donkeys, and hybrids. Inclusive language has been used as much as possible. However, in order to make an already difficult scientific and specialised subject intelligible and easier to read, the editors have retained the style rule that permits the generic masculine gender (he/him/his) to refer to both sexes. To further avoid complicating the text, they have also opted to not include any doublets, typographical symbols, or marks that interrupt standard words of the language.
The domestic pig originates from the Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa). We have sequenced mitochondrial DNA and nuclear genes from wild and domestic pigs from Asia and Europe. Clear evidence was obtained for domestication to have occurred independently from wild boar subspecies in Europe and Asia. The time since divergence of the ancestral forms was estimated at approximately 500,000 years, well before domestication approximately 9,000 years ago. Historical records indicate that Asian pigs were introduced into Europe during the 18th and early 19th centuries. We found molecular evidence for this introgression and the data indicated a hybrid origin of some major "European" pig breeds. The study is an advance in pig genetics and has important implications for the maintenance and utilization of genetic diversity in this livestock species.
The horse is ridden by means of the bit, and the bit leaves its trace on the horse's teeth. The beginnings of horse-rising are here identified by defining and detecting microscopic bit wear on equid teeth, using comparative samples from 4 countries and 25 000 yr of prehistory. Scanning electron microscope analysis demonstrates that bit wear is clearly distinguishable from other tooth damage. It first occurs in the Ukraine, USSR, at about 4000 BC. Soon thereafter, mobility became a cultural advantage that transformed Eurasian societies. Horses, not wheels, provided the first significant innovation in human land transport, with an effect comparable in scope to that of the introduction of the steam locomotive or private automobile. Horseback riding contributed to profound changes in trade and trade routes, settlement patterns, warfare and other inter-societal relations, grassland subsistence practices, social organization and political ideology. -from Authors
— We studied sequence variation in 16S rDNA in 204 individuals from 37 populations of the land snail Candidula unifasciata (Poiret 1801) across the core species range in France, Switzerland, and Germany. Phylogeographic, nested clade, and coalescence analyses were used to elucidate the species evolutionary history. The study revealed the presence of two major evolutionary lineages that evolved in separate refuges in southeast France as result of previous fragmentation during the Pleistocene. Applying a recent extension of the nested clade analysis (Templeton 2001), we inferred that range expansions along river valleys in independent corridors to the north led eventually to a secondary contact zone of the major clades around the Geneva Basin. There is evidence supporting the idea that the formation of the secondary contact zone and the colonization of Germany might be postglacial events. The phylogeographic history inferred for C. unifasciata differs from general biogeographic patterns of postglacial colonization previously identified for other taxa, and it might represent a common model for species with restricted dispersal.
The "Kurgan culture" concept has for two decades been the central element in attempts to explain the cultural shifts that occurred during the Late Copper Age/Early Broze Age transition in Eastern Europe, ca. 2500 b.c. These shifts represented a significant departure from earlier cultural trajectories and established the foundation for the subsequent development of European societies. It is suggested here tht the "Kurgan culture" concept lacks interpretative utility, for it unites archaeological groups of widely different origin, chronological placement, and cultural affiliation. Such distinctions are documented in the cases of the Sredni Stog culture, the Yamma horizon, and the Usatovo culture. An alternative explanation for many of the observed cultural changes can be found in the domestication of the horse and its development as a mount by steppe river-valley societies during the period 3300-2700 b.c. The socioeconomic implications of this event are specified by using the American Indian experience with...