Article

Accuracy and significance of prenatal diagnosis of single umbilical artery

University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 3.85). 01/2001; 16(7):667. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00303.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

No abstract is available for this article.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Tom Farrell, Sep 05, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the possible association between single umbilical artery (SUA) at 11-14 weeks of gestation and the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities. Color flow imaging of the fetal pelvis was used to determine the number of umbilical arteries in 717 fetuses immediately before chorionic villus sampling for karyotyping at 11-14 weeks' gestation. Single umbilical artery (SUA) was diagnosed in 21/634 (3.3%) chromosomally normal fetuses, in 5/44 (11.4%) with trisomy 21, 14/18 (77.8%) with trisomy 18 and 2/21 (9.5%) with other chromosomal defects. In the chromosomally normal group there was no significant difference in median fetal crown-rump length or nuchal translucency (NT) between those with a single and those with two umbilical arteries. In the 42 fetuses with SUA the expected number of cases of trisomy 21, estimated on the basis of maternal age, gestational age and fetal NT, was 4.7, which was not significantly different from the observed 5. The corresponding numbers for trisomy 18 were 2.0 for expected and 14 for observed (Fisher's exact test P = 0.0016). A SUA at 11-14 weeks' gestation has a high association with trisomy 18 and other chromosomal defects.
    Preview · Article · Dec 2003 · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was to 1) evaluate the gestational age at diagnosis and the incidence of single umbilical artery in an unselected population of 3750 pregnant women; 2) identify its association with malformations and/or karyotype aberrations in pre/postnatal age; 3) evaluate the fetal-neonatal outcome; 4) investigate the likelihood that a fetus might be affected by a cytogenetic abnormality even in presence of an apparently ''isolated'' single umbilical artery. Transabdominal ultrasound of the umbilical vessels and histological confirmation at birth. In presence of single umbilical artery an accurate prenatal ultrasound assessment, karyotyping (pre/postnatal), and clinical follow-up after birth were performed. The incidence of single umbilical artery in our population resulted 1.07% (40/3750), being ''isolated'' in 40% of cases. The diagnosis of chromosomal aberration associated with single umbilical artery was made in 6 cases (15%), while structural fetal abnormalities in absence of causal chromosomal anomalies were present in 9 cases (22.5%), with syndromic patterns in 3 of them. In 2 cases with chromosomal anomalies the single umbilical artery was apparently ''isolated'' at the ultrasound examination between the 17th and the 22nd week of gestation. Excluding 4 terminations of pregnancy, the perinatal mortality percentage resulted 25% (9/36); similarly, fetal growth retardation was present in 25% of cases (9/36). The incidence of single umbilical artery in our population confirms that this fetal vascular anomaly is frequently identified in pregnancy. In the light of our cases and data in the literature it is evident that diligent surveillance in prenatal age and accurate clinical follow-up after birth are mandatory when a single umbilical artery has been diagnosed. Finally, the possibility, even if rare, that even when the single umbilical artery is apparently ''isolated'', a chromosomal aberration might be present (1/24 of our ''isolated'' cases) should be considered when addressing correct counselling to the couples.
    No preview · Article · May 2005 · Minerva ginecologica
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate ultrasound "soft markers" used in fetal genetic screening. Ultrasound screening at 16 to 20 weeks is one of the most common genetic screening and (or) diagnostic tests used during pregnancy. The practical concern for ultrasound screening is false-positive and false-negative (missed or not present) results. The use and understanding of ultrasound soft markers and their screening relative risks is an important option in the care of pregnant women. Currently, the presence of a "significant" ultrasound marker adds risk to the likelihood of fetal pathology, but the absence of soft markers, except in controlled situations, should not be used to reduce fetal risk. The use of ultrasound in pregnancy has significant health and economic outcomes for families and the health care system, compared with no ultrasound use. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) recommends a single "routine" ultrasound evaluation at 16 to 20 weeks in all pregnancies. Patients need to be counselled about the positive and negative findings that ultrasound may reveal so they are prepared for unexpected pregnancy knowledge and the possibility of further testing options being offered. Committee members were asked to review specific soft marker ultrasound topics after consensus was reached on the most commonly published soft markers. Medline and PubMed databases were searched for peer-reviewed English articles published from 1985 to 2003. Reviews of each soft marker topic were written by committee members with quality of evidence and classification of recommendations. These reviews were then circulated and discussed by the combined committee. Final format for the guideline was completed by the committee chairpersons. The quality of evidence and classification of recommendations followed discussion and consensus by the combined committees of Diagnostic Imaging and Genetics of the SOGC. It is not possible at this time to determine the benefits, harms, and costs of the guideline because this would require health surveillance and research and health resources not presently available; however, these factors need to be evaluated in a prospective approach by provincial and tertiary initiatives. Consideration of these issues is in the options and outcome section of this abstract. 1. The screening ultrasound at 16 to 20 weeks should evaluate 8 markers, 5 of which (thickened nuchal fold, echogenic bowel, mild ventriculomegaly, echogenic focus in the heart, and choroid plexus cyst) are associated with an increased risk of fetal aneuploidy, and in some cases with nonchromosomal problems, while 3 (single umbilical artery, enlarged cisterna magna, and pyelectasis) are only associated with an increased risk of nonchromosomal abnormalities when seen in isolation (II-2 B). 2. Identification of soft markers for fetal aneuploidy requires correlation with other risk factors, including history, maternal age, and maternal serum testing results (II-1 A). 3. Soft markers identify a significant increase in fetal risk for genetic disease. Timely referral for confirmation, counselling, and investigation is required to maximize management options (III-B). Peer-reviewed guideline development is part of the committee process in addition to SOGC council and editorial review.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2005 · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada: JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada: JOGC
Show more