Comparison of the evidence summaries presented here reveals considerable general
agreement on the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the interventions reviewed,
with only a few instances in which different reviews reached different conclusions.There is uniform agreement on the effectiveness of the clinical interventions,
although the magnitude of the effects differed slightly. Screening patients for
tobacco use, delivering brief advice or more intense or frequent counseling to quit,
and the use of pharmacologic treatments (nicotine replacement or bupropion as
first-line therapies) were identified as effective in increasing patient tobacco use
cessation. Self-help education materials were assessed as less effective or
inconsistent.The health care system interventions evaluated in these reviews primarily focused on
increasing the delivery or use of effective clinical strategies. For most
interventions, the assessment of effectiveness was consistent across the evidence
reviews. Provider reminder systems (alone or in combination with other
interventions), patient cessation support provided by telephone (when implemented
with other interventions), and interventions to reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
for effective cessation treatments were all identified as effective. The reviews
differed slightly in the assessment of provider education programs. Two of the
reviews, the Community Guide and the SGR, identified limitations in
the evidence of effectiveness of provider education when implemented alone. The
reviews were consistent, however, in identifying stronger evidence of effectiveness
when provider education efforts were combined with other interventions, such as a
provider reminder system. The assessments of community interventions to reduce exposure to ETS, reduce tobacco
use initiation, and increase tobacco use cessation were also consistent. Both the
Community Guide and the SGR identified smoking bans and
restrictions as effective in reducing exposure to ETS, and potentially effective in
reducing tobacco use prevalence. Regarding community education efforts to reduce
exposure to ETS in the home, the Community Guide found insufficient
evidence to make a recommendation, whereas the SGR identified mass media messages
included in the state campaigns in California and Massachusetts as effective in
protecting children from exposure to ETS.The evidence reviews of interventions to reduce tobacco use initiation in children
and adolescents uniformly agreed on the effectiveness of increasing the unit price
of tobacco products. The reviews differed slightly in the assessment of the evidence
of effectiveness of mass media campaigns in reducing tobacco use among youth. All of
the guidelines, however, identified effective campaigns characterized by a solid
theoretical basis, use of formative research in designing the messages, and a
broadcast campaign of reasonable intensity over an extended period of time. One
reason for the stronger recommendation in the Community Guide is
the addition of recent evaluations of effectiveness of state campaigns in Florida
26,
27 and Massachusetts,
28 which were not available for earlier reviews.Evidence reviews of interventions to increase tobacco use cessation uniformly
documented the effectiveness both of increasing the unit price of tobacco products
and of mass media campaigns (when implemented with other interventions). Telephone
cessation support, when implemented with other interventions, was also identified as
effective in increasing tobacco use cessation. Regarding telephone support, these
reviews all found greater evidence of effectiveness for proactive support (contact
or follow-up initiated by a clinician or counselor) than for reactive (patient
initiates all contact).