ArticlePDF Available

Galen and the Antonine Plague

Authors:
Galen and the Antonine Plague
Author(s): R. J. Littman and M. L. Littman
Source:
The American Journal of Philology,
Vol. 94, No. 3 (Autumn, 1973), pp. 243-255
Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/293979 .
Accessed: 16/03/2011 21:05
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at .
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=jhup. .
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The
American Journal of Philology.
http://www.jstor.org
GALEN AND THE ANTONINE PLAGUE.
During the reign of Marcus Aurelius the Roman Empire was
struck by a prolonged and destructive epidemic. It began at
the end of 165, or beginning of 166 A.D., in Mesopotamia
during
Verus' Parthian campaign and quickly spread to Rome within
the year.1 The epidemic lasted at least until the death of Marcus
Aurelius in 180 A.D. and more likely into the early part of
Commodus'
reign,2 probably with another outbreak in 189 A.D.3
The Antonine plague was once viewed as a decisive event in
Roman history. According to Niebuhr 4 C
This pestilence must
For the evidence see S.H.A. Verus 8.1-2; W. Schur RE 36, 3rd ed.
(1949) 2025 s.v. Parthia; J. F. Gilliam, "The Plague under Marcus
Aurelius," AJP 82 (1961) 228-29 (hereafter Gilliam). Lucian (Hist.
Conscr., 15) tells of the work of Crepereius Calpurnianus, who in his
history of Verus' Parthian War, wrote of a plague in Nisibis after
the style of Thucydides. The siege of Nisibis was probably in 165, but
the date is uncertain (see Gilliam 229). As Gilliam says, there is no
way of knowing whether this is the same which struck the Romans at
Seleucia in winter 165/66 A.D., but there is no reason to doubt that
it was the same disease.
2 This is based on Galen's comments. See Gilliam 228 n. 12.
8 According to Dio Cassius 72.14.3-4 about 189 A.D. under Commodus'
reign a pestilence occurred, the greatest of any of which he had knowl-
edge, in which 2,000 persons often died in Rome in a single day. What
other plagues Dio has in mind when he says this one was the greatest
is not clear. Dio may not consider this as part of the plague under
M. Aurelius, or this outbreak might have been more virulent than
those under Marcus. Herodian 1.12.1 refers to this outbreak. He says
a plague struck Italy. This does not preclude the possibility that it
also attacked other parts of the Empire. His account does not seem
very reliable. He says the plague killed all the animals that came into
contact with men and also that there was a famine. Although it is
possible that the outbreak of 189 was another disease, most likely it
was the same one as struck under M. Aurelius. In their routes of
contagion plagues lie dormant, wait for a more susceptible generation
and double back along the routes which they have taken. For example,
Mexico City suffered major outbreaks of smallpox in 1737, 1761,
1779 and 1797/98. A second flareup of the epidemic in 189 A.D. would
be perfectly consistent with the pattern of epidemic diseases.
4 Lectures on the History of Rome, 2nd ed., III (London, 1849) 251.
243
R. J. LITTMAN AND M. L. LITTMAN.
have raged with incredible fury; and it carried off innumerable
victims. As the reign of M. Aurelius forms a turning point in
so many things, and above all in literature and art, I have no
doubt that this crisis was brought about by that plague . . .
The ancient world never recovered from the blow inflicted upon
it by the plague which visited it in the reign of M. Aurelius."
Otto Seeck 5 maintained that over half the population of the
Empire perished. Recently a more realistic picture of the effects
of the plague has been reached. Freely admitting that the
Antonine plague probably caused more deaths than any other
epidemic during the Empire before the mid third century, J.
F. Gilliam 6 demonstrates that the significance of the epidemic
as a factor in Rome's decline, as well as its general importance,
has been vastly overstated, in the exaggerated accounts of his-
torical writers of late antiquity, such as the iHistoria Augusta,
and in modern works. Gilliam suggests a mortality of about 2
percent or one million deaths, as a more plausible estimate of
the catastrophe.
The Antonine plague holds an important place in the history
of medicine because of its association with Galen. Galen had
first hand knowledge of the disease. He was in Rome when the
plague reached there in 166 A.D., although he soon left (Kiihn
19.15). Galen was also present in the winter of 168/9 A.D.
during an outbreak among troops stationed at Aquileia (Kiihn
19.18). He had considerable
experience with the epidemic since
he refers to it as very long lasting and speaks with assurance
on its symptoms and his treatment of it.
Although Galen describes other diseases and methods of treat-
ment at times in very great detail, unfortunately his references
to the plague are scattered and brief, with no attempt at a com-
plete description. Unlike Thucydides in his account of the
Athenian plague, Galen was not trying to present a description
of the disease so that it could be recognized by future genera-
tions, should it break out again; nor was he writing for the
layman. He was more interested in the treatment and physical
effects of the disease. For example, in his discussion of the case
5 Geschichte des Untergangs der antiken Welt, 3rd ed., I (Stuttgart,
1910) 398-405.
6 Gilliam 225-51.
244
GALEN AND THE ANTONINE PLAGUE.
of a young man afflicted with the plague, he concentrates on
the treatment of internal and external ulcerations (Kiihn
10.360ff.).
The few other contemporary
writers whose works survive give
no additional useful information on the nature of the disease.
Because of the paucity of detail in Galen, writers have been
wary of making a firm diagnosis of the Antonine plague. Tenta-
tively the epidemic has been identified as one of smallpox,
exanthematous typhus or perhaps bubonic plague, with smallpox
most preferred.7 Firstly, it is the purpose of this paper to show
that the case for smallpox is very strong, and that the evidence
points to a high incidence of hemorrhagic smallpox in the out-
break. Secondly, through the identification of the disease, we
hope to arrive at a more accurate estimate of the mortality rate.
I
IDENTIFICATION OF THE DISEASE.
Although Galen's description of the symptomatology of the
Antonine plague is sketchy,8 we believe that enough informa-
tion is present to make a firm diagnosis of smallpox.9 Since
7 H. Haeser, Lehrbuch der Geschichte der Medicin und der epi-
demischen Krankheiten, 3rd ed., III (Jena, 1882) 24-33, smallpox. H.
Zinsser, Rats, Lice and History (Boston, 1935) pp. 135-37 concurs. A
Castiglioni, A History of Medicine (New York, 1941) p. 244, exanthema-
tous typhus or perhaps bubonic plague. In the tenth century Rhazes
felt Galen's plague was smallpox. See A treatise on the smallpox and
measles by Abu Beer Mohammed ibn Zacariya ar Razi (commonly called
Rhazes), trans. W. A. Greenhill (London, 1848). As diseases adapt to
new hosts under changing environments over the passage of years, the
symptomatology may change. However, basic symptomatology of a
disease remains the same. For example, typhus and typhus related
diseases, while they have a tendency to mutate, have always exhibited
a flat centrifugal rash. Smallpox seems to have undergone the least
change in the course of history. This is particularly evident when we
see the close argreement between Rhazes' tenth century description of
smallpox and modern accounts of the disease.
8 The passages are collected by J. F. K. Heeker, De peste Antoniniana
commentatio (Berlin, 1835) and Haeser (see above n. 7).
For the medical aspects of smallpox see T. F. Ricketts and J. B.
Byles, The Diagnosis of Smallpox (London, 1908) (hereafter Ricketts
and Byles); for the history of typhus see Zinsser (see n. 7 above); for
245
R. J. LITTMAN AND M. L. LITTMAN.
the account is incomplete, one cannot argue out of hand that a
sign or symptom was not present, simply because Galen does not
describe it, unless that symptom would be an integral part of
the specific item Galen is describing. Below is a summary of the
signs and symptoms of the disease as Galen presents them.
SUMMARY OF SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS.
EXANTHEM.
1. On the ninth day a certain young man was covered over
his whole body by an exanthem, as was the case with nearly
all who survived. Drying drugs were applied to his body. On
the twelfth day he was able to get out of bed. (Methodus
medendi 5.12=Kiihn 10.360ff.).
2. In those who were going to survive who had diarrhea, a
black exanthem appeared
over the whole body. It (the exanthem)
was ulcerated in most cases and dry (no liquid oozing out) in all.
The blackness was due to a remnant of blood which had putrified
in the fever blisters,10
like some ash which nature had deposited
on the skin. " Of some of these which had become ulcerated, that
part of the surface called the scab fell away and then the re-
maining part nearby was healthy and after one or two days be-
came scarred over. In those places where it was not ulcerated,
the exanthem was rough and scabby and fell away like some
husk and hence all became healthy." (Methodus medendi 5.12=
Kiihn 10.367).
3. In many cases where there were no bloody colliquescences
(diarrhea), the entire body was covered by a black exanthem.
"And sometimes a sort of scale fell off, when the exanthem had
typhus see R. P. Strong, Typhus Fever with Particular Reference to the
Serbian Epidemic (Cambridge, Mass., 1920) and S. B. Wolbach, et al.,
The Etiology and Pathology of Typhus (Cambridge, Mass., 1922); for
bubonic plague W. E. Jennings, A Manual of Plague (London, 1903)
and J. Cantlie, Plague (New York, 1900). An excellent introduction
to the medical aspects of viral and rickettsial diseases is T. M. Rivers
and F. L. Horsfall (eds.), Viral and Rickettsial Infections of Man,
3rd ed. (Philadelphia, 1959).
10
Galen uses the word ,rvper6s. This seems to be equivalent to
7re/iJLyzriw&s.
See Stephanus s.v. 7rvperos and 7reuTLyw8rqs
and his discussion
of Galen's and Hippocrates' use of the word.
246
GALEN AND THE ANTONINE PLAGUE.
dried and dissipated, little by little, over a period of many days
after the crisis." (De atra bile 4==Kiihn 5.115).
FEVER.
1. Those afflicted
with plague appear neither warm, nor burn-
ing to those who touch them, although they are raging with
fever inside, just as Thucydides describes (in the Athenian
plague). (Comment. 1 in Hippocratis Libr. 6 Epidemiorum.
Aph. 29=Kiihn 17.1.885).
2. Galen calls the plague a fever plague. (Comment. S in
Hippocratis Libr. 3 Epidemiorum. Aph. 57-Kiihn 17.1.709).
BOWELS.
1.Black excrement was a symptom of those who had the
disease, whether they survived or perished of it. Colliquescence
(diarrhea) was first auburn, then yellowish red, later black,
like fecal matter of blood. (Comment. 4 in Hippocratis
Aphorismos. Aph. 31=Kiihn 17.2.683).
2. Colliquescence of evacuation was an inseparable symptom
of the plague. (Comment. S in Hippocratis Libr. S Epidemiorum.
Aph. 57=-Kiihn 17.1.709).
3. In many who survived, black stools appeared, mostly on
the ninth day or even the seventh or eleventh day. Many dif-
ferences occurred. Some had stools that were nearly black; some
had neither pains in their excretions, nor were their excretions
foul smelling. Very many stood in the middle. If the stool was
not black, the exanthem always appeared. All those who excreted
very black stools died. (De atra bile 4=-Kiihn 5.115).
VOMITING.
Occurred in some cases. (Methodus medendi 5.12=Kiihn
10.367).
STOMACH UPSET.
Occurred in all cases. (Methodus medendi 5.12=Kiihn
10.367).
FETID BREATH.
Occurred. (De praesagitione ex pulsibus 3.4=Kiihn 9.357).
247
R. J. LITTMAN AND M. L. LITTMAN.
COUGH-CATARRH.
1. On the ninth day a young man had a slight cough. On
the tenth day the cough became stronger and with it he brought
up scabs. (Methodus medendi 5.12=Kiihn 10.360).
2. After having catarrh for many days, first with a cough
he brought up a little bright fresh blood, and afterwards even
part of the membrane which lines the artery and rises through
the larynx to the pharynx and mouth. (Methodus medendi
5.12=Kiihn 10.367).
INTERNAL ULCERATIONS AND INFLAMMATION.
On the tenth day a young man coughed and brought up a scab,
which was an indication of an ulcerated area in the windpipe
in the region of the trachea near the jugular vein. No ulcers
were present in the mouth or throat (there was no problem of
ingesting food). (Methodus medendi 5.12=Kiihn 10.360). The
larynx was infected, and the man's voice was damaged.
(Methodus medendi 5.12==Kiihn 10.367).
DURATION
OF THE DISEAiSE.
1. The crisis appeared on the ninth to twelfth day. On the
third day after the ninth the young man was able to rise from
his bed. (Methodus medendi 5.12=Kiihn 10.360. Cf. De atra
bile 4=Kiihn 5.115).
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS.
The distinguishing feature and the differential symptoms for
most exanthematous diseases (where a skin eruption occurs) is
the rash. Dr. J. C. Snyder states 11 (italics ours):
Before the appearance of the characteristic rash, and on
clinical grounds alone, it is impossible to assert with ac-
curacy that a patient is suffering from typhus. The clinical
picture of the early stages of several acute infectious diseases
closely resembles that of epidemic typhus. Those which
are likely to be confused with it are murine typhus, small-
pox, relapsing fever malaria, typhoid fever, meningococcic
meningitis, measles and yellow fever. The appearance and
the evolution of the typhus rash serve to distinguish it from
eruptions which are features of certain other acute infectious
diseases.
"Rivers and Horsfall (see above n. 9) 811.
248
GALEN AND THE ANTONINE PLAGUE.
Dr. Snyder told us in conversation of his experience with typhus
and smallpox while he was a young physician in Cairo. Simul-
taneous outbreaks of the two diseases occurred, and it was often
impossible to distinguish between the two in their early stages.
Fortunately one of the symptoms with which Galen deals in
great detail is the skin rash. The first point which he emphasizes
each time he speaks of the exanthem is that it covered the entire
body. This is consistent with the topical distribution of small-
pox and typhus rashes, but not with bubonic plague.12 Another
salient feature of the rash was that it was generally black, al-
though in one case presumably it was not.13 According to Galen
the blackness was due to a remnant of blood putrified in-the
fever blister (hemorrhagic). In smallpox the rash usually be-
comes vesicular and there are pronounced hemorrhagic extra-
vasations into the lesions. This phase of smallpox is identified
as hemorrhagic smallpox and was attributed by Ricketts and
Byles to the circulation of a specific poison or toxin.14 Another
phase of smallpox which could be described as having a black
exanthem is the purpuric, in which the skin is densely packed
with small petechiae which spread out with larger extravasa-
tions.15 However, we believe that Galen refers primarily to
the classical hemorrhagic exanthem. Hemorrhagic extravasa-
tions into the skin also occur in typhus.l6 A differential feature
of the smallpox and typhus rashes is that smallpox produces
raised vesicular and pustular lesions, while the lesions of typhus
are flat and never pustular. While Galen is not specific on
1"
In bubonic plague, plague boils may be present (Jennings [see
above n. 9] 87), but they do not occur in every case. In addition, the
distribution is not over the whole body, but tends to be near the buboes
in the groin and axilla. In his description of the bubonic plague at the
time of Justinian, Procopius (2.22.30) reports " in some cases the body
broke out with black pustules." Procopius does not say these pustules
covered the whole body. Also there is no mention of buboes in Galen.
As part of his remarks about the exanthem, we would expect references
to the buboes if the disease were indeed bubonic plague.
13
In Methodus medendi 5.12=Kuhn 10.360 Galen describes a case
with a rash, but he does not say the rash was black. Since in other
cases he says it is black, presumably here the rash was not so.
"Ricketts and Byles 109. Hemorrhage from smallpox is not neces-
sarily synonymous with hemorrhagic smallpox.
5 Ricketts and Byles 97.
" Ricketts and Byles 109.
249
R. J. LITTMAN AND M. L. LITTMAN.
whether the exanthem in the Antonine plague was raised or
flat,'7 he suggests that it was pustular. In his discussion of
raised blisters (Kiihn 17.1.882) (7reqA7&yW8es),
which he defines as
pustules and ulcers, Galen implies that these were present in
the Antonine plague. He further implies the Antonine plague
had a blistery rash when he says the plague was similar to the
Thucydidean plague and quotes a passage which includes
Thucydides' words about the rash being blistery (AXvKrcatvatF
r/LKPpats Kal XK'mrov
f'rev6KOsK), although he was more interested
in comparing the fevers in the two plagues. In another passage
Galen again says the plague was very close in form to the one
described by Thucydides (Kiihn 12.191). Galen also says the
exanthem became ulcerated in most cases (EXAKWsr
). This would
correspond to the pustular stage of the smallpox rash. Accord-
ing to Galen the blackness was like some ash which nature had
deposited on the skin (Kiihn 10.367). This suggests a raised
hemorrhagic lesion and/or desquamating lesion, which favors
the identification of the disease as smallpox.
Galen describes the exanthem as becoming rough and scabby
(escharotic) where there was no ulceration, and he mentions a
scabbing around the ulcerated areas (Kiihn 10.367). This cor-
responds to the desquamation process in smallpox lesions. Ac-
cording to Ricketts and Byles, the cuticle around the mark left
by the fallen eschar becomes partly detached and ragged.18 The
typhus desquamation
on the other hand is branny (fine powder)
and is usually not rough and never escharotic.
Galen implies the exanthem might not appear in fatal cases.19
This is not an uncommon occurence in hemorrhagic smallpox.
According to Ricketts and Byles,20
" Cases in which death wholly
anticipates the efflorescence are, in reality, very exceptional.
More often, when cases of that repute occur, it is possible to de-
tect a few papules if they are sought, not on the face, but on
some part of the body where the circulation is less impaired."
17 Galen uses the word 'XKOS (Methodus medendi 5.12=Kiihn 10.360)
and edPOv0A.a
(Methodus medendi 5.12=Kuhn 10.362) with refers to
undifferentiated exanthem.
18 Ricketts and Byles 55.
19 Galen says (Kuhn 10.360 and 10.367) that the exanthem appeared
on the whole body, "as was the case with nearly all who survived."
2o Ricketts and Byles 96.
250
GALEN AND THE ANTONINE PLAGUZE.
In referring to blood in the pustules and other bleeding in
hemorrhagic smallpox, Ricketts and Byles add "Yet all these
tardy evidences of the tendency to bleed are wholly devoid of
significance. They are but the foot-prints of an illness which
has passed."
21 This is consistent with Galen's statement that
those who were going to survive developed a black exanthem.
Galen's description of the exanthem provides a fairly typical
picture of the smallpox rash, particularly of the hemorrhagic
phase of the disease. The rash was unlike that of typhus, par-
ticularly in its vesicular nature and in its desquamation. No
plague disease other than smallpox is known to produce an
exanthem such as Galen describes.22
The other symptoms and signs which Galen dwells on are
those of the alimentary tract, particularly diarrhea and black
stools. Galen said that if the stool was very black, the patient
died (Kuhn 5.115). Gastrointestinal symptoms are not very
important in the differential diagnosis of most exanthematous
diseases, though they may assist in identifying the disease. They
happen to coincide well with the symptoms of hemorrhagic
small-
pox, where black stools would indicate gastrointestinal bleeding.
Diarrhea is a frequent sign of smallpox. In hemorrhagic small-
pox intestinal ulcerations and bleeding occur frequently. In
some cases the entire circumference of the bowel may be black
for several inches from extensive extravasations of blood be-
neath the mucous membrane. Galen remarks that the amount
of black stools varied. This variation would depend on the
severity of the intestinal lesions. Galen also observes that in
cases where the stool was not black, the black exanthem appeared
21 Ricketts and Byles 75.
22 Galen makes no reference to the residual scarring so characteristic
of smallpox. Given his only partial description of the disease and his
primary interest in treatment and diagnosis of the disease, the omission
of the scarring, which is a result of the disease that may not appear
until several weeks after the disease has run its course, is not startling,
though regrettable. However, his description of the exanthem is suf-
ficiently complete to allow identification of the disease as smallpox.
There are modern near parallels: in the account of smallpox in C. E.
van Rooyen and A. J. Rhodes, Virus Diseases of Man (New York, 1948)
pp. 286-98, there is no mention at all of the characteristic pockmarks.
In the description of smallpox by Ricketts and Byles only one para-
graph in the entire book deals with the pockmarks.
251
R. J. LITTMAN AND M. L. LITTMAN.
(Kiihn 5.115). This is consistent with hemorrhagic smallpox,
for if the patient is severely ill, death may occur before the
appearance of the exanthem. In less severe cases, where the
stool is not black and intestinal bleeding is not present, there
is time for the exanthem to manifest itself before death ensues.
Although diarrhea also occurs in bubonic plague and typhus,
constipation is the more usual symptom. In bubonic plague only,
the stool may occasionally contain blood.23
In the Antonine epidemic the duration of the disease and
other symptoms and signs which Galen describes, such as fever,
vomiting, fetid breath, catarrh, cough and ulceration of the
larynx and trachea are consistent with smallpox.
Although Galen's description of the plague is incomplete, it
is adequate enough to enable firm identification of the disease
as smallpox because of the excellent description of the most
important diagnostic sign, the exanthem. The hemorrhagic
nature of the exanthem and the intestinal bleeding strongly
suggest that there was a very high incidence of the hemorrhagic
phase of smallpox, as well as the purpuric phase, which are the
disease's most virulent forms. In the Minneapolis outbreak of
1924-25, 164 deaths occurred out of 196 cases of hemorrhagic
and purpuric smallpox, while there were only 165 deaths out of
386 cases of unclassified, discrete and confluent smallpox.24
Bubonic plague and typhus are unlikely causes of the Antonine
plague since neither exhibit the features of the disease which
Galen describes,
particularly in regard to the exanthem.
II
MORTALITY
RATE.
J. F. Gilliam 25 has laid to rest the picture of the Antonine
plague as devastating the entire Roman Empire and killing half
the population. However, we believe he has gone too far to the
other extreme in estimating a mortality of only 1 to 2 percent
due to the plague. A mortality rate of 7 to 10 percent would be
a more reasonable figure.
23 Jennings 83.
24 S. E. Sweitzer and K. Ikeda, "Variola: a clinical study of the
Minneapolis epidemic of 1924-1925," Arch. Dermat. Syph. 15 (1927)
19-29.
2 Gilliam (see above n. 1).
252
GALEN AND THE ANTONINE PLAGUE.
Many factors make it difficult to assess the mortality of the
Antonine plague. The ancient sources are vague and may exag-
gerate. More important, they may be generalizing from an out-
break in a single city, such as Rome. Even along routes of
contagion and centers of infections, the same pandemic will have
varying effects. The mortality rate in a particular city would
be affected by such factors as crowding, sanitary conditions,
season of the year, severity of secondary infections which ac-
company the plague in a particular place, the methods with
which the city may deal with the plague and also pure chmnce.
Compare
the effects of smallpox which struck Greece in 430-427
B.C.26 Athens was very hard hit because the city was under
siege and crowded with people, while the Peloponnese escaped
almost unscathed. Even where conditions in various cities appear
to be comparable, such as in the smallpox outbreak in West
Prussia in 1874, considerable variation often exists in mortality
rates.27
Even if we were to have accurate statistics for the deaths
occurring in one city during the Antonine epidemic we would
be unable to generalize about the whole Empire. In the case
of the Black Death (bubonic plague) which struck Europe in
the fourteenth century, we can arrive at more accurate estimates
because of the existence of many records, such as poll tax, parish
and hearth tax records, which provide information over a wide
geographical area and time. It is equally impossible to approxi-
mate with certainty the death rate of a plague disease at any
specific outbreak, solely from the nature of the disease, because
of such factors as the resistance of the populace to the disease.28
26 For the identification of the Athenian plague as smallpox, see R.
J. Littman and M. L. Littman, "The Athenian Plague: Smallpox,"
TAPA 100 (1969) 261-75.
27 F. Prinzing, Epidemics Resulting from Wars (Oxford, 1916) p.
222. During the outbreak in West Prussia the death rate ranged from
a low of 4.8 percent of the population in Berent, to 11.9 percent, over
twice the death rate, in Schwetz.
28 If a disease strikes a virgin population, where resistance is low,
the mortality rate will be extremely high. For example, the outbreak
of measles in Fiji in 1875 killed a great number of the inhabitants,
though measles is usually a very mild disease. In 1801 General Leclerc
landed in Haiti with 25,000 men to put down the revolt led by Toussaint
L'Ouverture. An epidemic of yellow fever then almost annihilated the
253
R. J. LITTMAN AND M. L. LITTMAN.
An individual outbreak of smallpox could have a mortality
rate of nearly 80 percent if the more virulent forms of the
disease were prevalent, and as low as 1 percent if the less virulent
forms of the disease predominated. However, if we study out-
breaks over a long period of time and broad geographical area,
a clear pattern of the mortality rate emerges for the disease.
During a pandemic, smallpox tends to be fatal to an average
of 25 percent of those infected. In any single epidemic, however,
usually only 60 to 80 percent of the population might contract
the disease. It has been estimated that during the eighteenth
century 60 percent of the population of Europe were attacked
by smallpox and 10 percent of the total population died of
the disease.29 During a smallpox outbreak in Mexico City in
1779/80 approximately 16 to 18 percent of the population died
of the disease.30 In a later outbreak in 1797/98 the mortality
rate was about 7 percent.31 In the previously mentioned outbreak
of smallpox in West Prussia about 7 to 8 percent of the populace
died.
Thus, when a severe epidemic of smallpox strikes, it seems
to produce a mean fatality of about 10 percent of the popula-
tion. As we have shown, the Antonine plague was most likely
smallpox. Since this plague was distributed over a wide geo-
graphical area, lasted for 23 years with sporadic flareups, and
was not attacking a virgin population, we can presume that
this smallpox pandemic followed a median mortality rate for
the disease, or a death rate of 7 to 10 percent. On this basis,
the outbreak in 165/6-168 A.D. would have caused approxi-
mately 3 1/2 to 5 million deaths, at a conservative estimate.
French troops. By 1803 only 3,000 were left alive to evacuate the
island, most deaths being due to yellow fever, while the native popula-
tion was barely affected. Nearly 50 percent of the population of New
Spain died of smallpox in 1520 when an infected sailor from Cortez's
ships spread the disease to the populace.
2, See E. E. Duvillard, Analyse et Tableaux de l'Influence de la
Petite Verole (Paris, 1806) pp. 105-106. For example, in Edinburgh
during the years 1744-1753 the death rate from smallpox was 9.6 per-
cent and from 1754 to 1763 9.8 percent. [C. Creighton, A History of
Epidemics in Britain (New York, 1965) 2.523].
80 D. B. Cooper, Epidemic Disease In Mexico City 1761-1813 (Austin,
Texas, 1965) p. 68.
?1
Cooper (see above n. 30) pp. 86-156.
254
GALEN AND THE ANTONINE PLAGUE.
Over the twenty-three year period, assuming that the initial
flareup and the one in 189 A.D. were the most severe, a total
number of deaths of 7 to 10 million over the normal mortality
rate would be again a conservative estimate.
Although pandemics may affect an entire area, centers of
population, such as cities and armies are usually hardest hit.
Plagues are highly contagious and tend to occur when many
people are crowded together, as in a city or army encampment.
Once an infectious plague strikes, its effects are compounded by
the great difficulty in maintaining sanitary conditions in a city.
"The degree of infection is in direct proportion to the progress
of communications. Geographical isolation is in itself a form
of defense: islands lying outside customary sea lanes and self-
supporting mountainous regions constitute fortresses of passive
resistence." 32
Thus we can expect the greatest mortality among armies and
cities, which indeed seems to be the case with the Antonine
pandemic.33 The fourth and fifth century sources consistently
refer to depopulation in the army, and Rome itself seems to have
been hard hit.34 If the death rate in the Empire was 7 to 10
percent on average, the rate in the cities and among the army
would be considerably higher, perhaps 13 to 15 percent.
Thus we can see that the Antonine plague significantly in-
creased the mortality rate, with a concomitant disruptive effect
on the Empire. However, even with this revised mortality rate,
Gilliam's conclusions remain: the plague was not a decisive
event in Roman history.35
R. J. LITTnMA AND M. L. LITTMArN,
M.D.
UNIVERSITY
OF HAWAII AND SUNY,
DOWNISTATE
MEDICAL CENTER.
82A. Siegfried, Routes of Contagion (New York, 1965) p. 17.
88See Prinzing (above n. 27).
84 Gilliam 236-39 deals with some figures on recruits. His results are
inconclusive. For the few inscriptions he produces, there was a decline
in the army, but there is no way to judge if this plague had a role
in it, and other explanations are possible. Eutropius 8.12, Orosius
7.15.5-6, S.H.A. Marcus 17.2 refer to losses in the army. The fact that
the plague began on Verus' Parthian campaign and was brought back
by the army means that it must have been raging in Verus' forces.
85 We are indebted to Professors Glen Bowersock and J. F. Gilliam.
255
... However Despite its brevity, this mortality estimate, usually interpreted as referring to the Antonine Plague [7], provides an invaluable insight into the impact of the disease on a single location at the time of Commodus' reign. If we suppose that these mortality figures refer to a late stage of the Antonine Plague (and assume that they are not simply a rhetorical exaggeration typical of disease accounts in antiquity), it should be reasonable to expect a similar mortality pattern to emerge in appropriately modeled scenarios of disease spread in Rome. ...
... In contrast, J. F. Gilliam concluded that only 1-2% beyond ordinary mortality (or 500,00 to 1,000,000 individuals) died due to this plague [5]. The Littmans concluded that the average death rate in the Empire was 7-10% and perhaps 13-15% in cities and the army [7]. According to D. W. Rathbone's comparison with the 14 th -century Black Death in Europe, the Antonine Plague may have caused a 20-30% decline in the population of Egypt [64]. ...
... 1%). This could mean that either our models are overly conservative [5] or that most of the literature interprets the available sources in a rather maximalist manner [3,7,10,21,64,65] (it is worth noting that criticism of the maximalist position has also recently arisen in the context of, for example, climatological evidence [4]). ...
Article
Full-text available
Some scholars consider the Antonine Plague to have been a major disease outbreak in the 2nd century CE that caused a significant decline in the population of the Roman Empire. Although there is currently no molecular evidence of the specific pathogen, literary evidence indicates the parameters of the disease that it caused and how significant the impact on Roman society was. One way to advance the current discussion concerning the Antonine Plague’s impact on the Roman Empire’s population is to examine the currently available sources and comparatively model the spread of different pathogens in a specific location with known demographic data for the relevant period. To accomplish this, we developed a series of dynamic ordinary differential equation models of the spread of disease in Rome between 165 and 189 CE for several pathogens. We found that daily disease deaths in the final years of the pandemic were inconsistent with estimates reported in primary sources, suggesting that either (a) the impact of the Antonine Plague may have been exaggerated in the descriptions of ancient authors, or (b) the daily deaths in ca. 189 CE were caused by a different disease event than the Antonine Plague, or (c) seasonality might have been a significant factor changing the intensity of disease spread, with the population more severely affected during the winter months. Although none of the pathogens we analyzed emerged as the likely causative agent of the Antonine Plague, the models show that the overall mortality rate would have increased maximally by 7%. This result contradicts the mortality rate accepted by historians who defend the thesis of the significant impact of this epidemic on the demography of the Roman Empire.
... Esta difusión es consistente con el hecho de que como sabemos, el retorno desde oriente se inició en el mes de abril, puesto que se celebró el triunfo militar en las calles de Roma en octubre de 166 d.C. Desde entonces, de acuerdo a la descripción de Galeno y la Historia Augusta se puede deducir que los años en que la peste afectó más fuertemente al Imperio fueron entre 167 y 168 d.C 14 . ...
Article
Full-text available
This article focuses on historically describing the spread of the Athenian plague and the Antonine plague. Through historical-geogra-phical simulation and considering the different contextual elements of the disease such as its rapid spread and means of transportation, we have built two simulations on how the epidemics would have eventua-lly been transmitted throughout the Mediterranean area. In this way, the characterization of the transmission of these diseases allows us to point out the impact of connection networks and how movements were factors that triggered structural changes in each of these societies. In short, we cannot understand the history of our Western society without referring to the impact of these processes from a holistic perspective that combines history, culture and infectious disease.
... The Antonine plague spread throughout the Roman Empire and infected many millions of people. The pandemic erupted during the last years of what is often considered 36 the "golden age" of Rome during the reign of co-emperor Marcus 37 Aurelius and Lucius Verus. The Roman Empire at that time had a population estimated at 75 million people, about one-fourth of all mankind. ...
Article
Full-text available
Caregiving is an important aspect of holistic healing but has often been neglected by the church in contemporary times. Holistic healing includes clinical medicine, psychology, pastoral care, and counseling. Apart from the diagnosis in a laboratory and administering drugs to the patient, the psychological operation to overcome the fear and neuroses that paralyze the patient is essential notwithstanding the pastor's role of touching on the patient's belief systems. Pastoral care and counseling as caregiving are indispensable because man is made up of both the physical and the spiritual. This paper adopts an epistemological approach to explore the place of caregiving in the African worldview of ill health, healing, and wholeness. Employing the theological method also, the study traces the correlation between illness and sin, which may lead to quarantine/social distancing that may worsen the patient's state. The paper historically assesses the involvement of the church in 'curing' by 'caring' for patients in epidemic periods which contributed to the Christianization of the Roman Empire. The paper, thereby, argues for greater attention of the church toward “caregiving” as a panacea to holistic healing and evangelization tools.
... The disease had a significant impact on Western civilization's growth. The Antonine plague was a global epidemic that killed some 7 million people in the Roman Empire in AD 108 [12]. The West Indies' discovery, Arab settlement, and the Crusades all contributed to the disease's dissemination. ...
Article
Full-text available
Edward Jenner who discovered immunology and the smallpox vaccine conducted a smallpox vaccination test in 1796, which is considered a landmark in the history of modern immunization. This review focuses on describing Jenner and his accomplishments highlighting his discovery as a shift in the approaches toward disease control and prevention as well as the basis for further eradicating smallpox globally. Jenner’s use of cowpox to protect people from smallpox was a revolution from other essential procedures such as variolation. His vaccine demonstrated how immunization could be used to combat diseases, and over the years the idea began to be deployed to other vaccines and other diseases. Besides the given medical profession, the work of Jenner was relevant to the changes or even enhancements of health policies and health systems globally. His vaccine provided not only the means to arrest a wide disease that could easily eliminate many human beings but also initiated procedures of disease prevention and control. Another important type of immunity, herd immunity, which determines an approach to managing specific diseases in the present, as well as knowledge of the degree of protection provided by the antigen in terms of the overall immune status of a population, was also achieved based on the actions taken after Jenner’s procedure. As our society searches for vaccines for emergent diseases to date, this review reveals that Jenner’s accomplishments are still relevant. In this article, analyzing Jenner’s approach and the role of society and science at the time, along with the consequences of his work, the reader sees how Jenner changed the world of public health and laid a foundation for today’s vaccination. Such an approach allows considering the changes and evolution of the topic that Jenner studied and contributed to and how people fight infections today.
Article
Full-text available
This article presents a case of osteomyelitis variolosa from a skeleton excavated in the Western Cemetery at Cirencester (Corinium) in Britain, dated to the 3rd or 4th c. CE. This osteological condition is caused by the variola virus, the causative agent of smallpox, and is found in some individuals who have survived a childhood smallpox infection, the condition manifesting many years later. The significance of this discovery is that it indicates that smallpox had been introduced into the Roman world, and to Britain in particular, by the late 3rd or 4th c. CE. Rather than postulating a separate and unrecorded introduction of smallpox into the Roman empire, we suggest that this discovery strengthens the case for seeing the 2nd-c. Antonine Plague as an early form of smallpox.
Article
Full-text available
Artykuł przedstawia studium ikonograficzne i ideologiczne denara Julii Mezy z legendą VENVS VICTRIX. Numizmat ten pochodzi z wiedeńskiej kolekcji Kunsthistorisches Museum. Analizę przeprowadzono w kontekście wykorzystania wizerunku bogini Wenus w autoprezentacji kobiet z dynastii Sewerów. Denar ukazuje atrybucję bogini niemal identyczną jak na monetach Karakalli, przez co Julia Meza podkreślała wizualnie swoją bliskość z siostrzeńcem, a co za tym idzie – legitymizowała prawa do tronu cesarskiego obu swych wnuków.
Article
Full-text available
The lack of a universally accepted definition of a pandemic hinders a comprehensive understanding of and effective response to these global health crises. Current definitions often lack quantitative criteria, rendering them vague and limiting their utility. Here, we propose a refined definition that considers the likelihood of susceptible individuals contracting an infectious disease that culminates in widespread global transmission, increased morbidity and mortality, and profound societal, economic, and political consequences. Applying this definition retrospectively, we identify 22 pandemics that occurred between 165 and 2024 AD and were caused by a variety of diseases, including smallpox (Antonine and American), plague (Justinian, Black Death, and Third Plague), cholera (seven pandemics), influenza (two Russian, Spanish, Asian, Hong Kong, and swine), AIDS, and coronaviruses (SARS, MERS, and COVID-19). This work presents a comprehensive analysis of past pandemics caused by both emerging and re-emerging pathogens, along with their epidemiological characteristics, societal impact, and evolution of public health responses. We also highlight the need for proactive measures to reduce the risk of future pandemics. These strategies include prioritizing surveillance of emerging zoonotic pathogens, conserving biodiversity to counter wildlife trafficking, and minimizing the potential for zoonotic spillover events. In addition, interventions such as promoting alternative protein sources, enforcing the closure of live animal markets in biodiversity-rich regions, and fostering global collaboration among diverse stakeholders are critical to preventing future pandemics. Crucially, improving wildlife surveillance systems will require the concerted efforts of local, national and international entities, including laboratories, field researchers, wildlife conservationists, government agencies and other stakeholders. By fostering collaborative networks and establishing robust biorepositories, we can strengthen our collective capacity to detect, monitor, and mitigate the emergence and transmission of zoonotic pathogens.
Article
Full-text available
The study examines contemporary perceptions of the emergence and spread of the plague in Central and Eastern Europe following the Battle of Belgrade in 1456. On one hand, the Battle of Belgrade represents a significant Christian victory in the conflicts with the Ottomans during the fifteenth century. Consequently, it was utilized in crusade-related propaganda discourse and perceived as a divine blessing for the anti-Ottoman crusade. On the other hand, some prominent figures such as John Hunyadi, John of Capistrano, and Serbian Despot George Branković died shortly after the event due to the outbreak of the plague during the battle. The research aims to explore how contemporary historical sources handled this duality between the sense of triumph and the plague outbreak. It provides an overview of the areas affected by the plague due to the movement of armies and the political and economic connections between different parts of East and Central Europe. The study investigates whether and to what extent reports of the plague from the region link the Battle of Belgrade to the outbreak of the disease. Additionally, it analyses fifteenth-century sources related to the battle itself. This segment of the research examines representations of the plague outbreak, particularly the infection and death of the aforementioned Christian leaders. The research focuses on how the discourse on the plague is interpreted in relation to narratives of heroism, martyrdom, and sainthood, addressing aspects of adaptation, marginalization, and the complete omission of mentions of the plague in these interpretations.
Epidemic Disease In Mexico City 1761-1813 (Austin, Texas, 1965) p. 68. ?1 Cooper (see above n. 30) pp
  • B Cooper
B. Cooper, Epidemic Disease In Mexico City 1761-1813 (Austin, Texas, 1965) p. 68. ?1 Cooper (see above n. 30) pp. 86-156.