Stigma as a Barrier to Recovery: Perceived Stigma and Patient-Rated Severity of Illness as Predictors of Antidepressant Drug Adherence

Cornell University, Итак, New York, United States
Psychiatric Services (Impact Factor: 2.41). 01/2002; 52(12):1615-20. DOI: 10.1176/
Source: PubMed


Major depression is undertreated despite the availability of effective treatments. Psychological barriers to treatment, such as perceived stigma and minimization of the need for care, may be important obstacles to adherence to the pharmacologic treatment of major depression. The authors examined the impact of barriers that were present at the initiation of antidepressant drug therapy on medication adherence in a mixed-age sample of outpatients with major depression.
A two-stage sampling design was used to identify adults with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, as determined by the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnosis, who sought mental health treatment at outpatient clinics. Additional instruments were administered to 134 newly admitted adults who had been taking a prescribed antidepressant medication for at least a week to assess perceived stigma, self-rated severity of illness, and views about treatment. The patients were reinterviewed three months later and were classified as adherent or nonadherent on the basis of self-reported estimates of the number and frequency of missed doses.
Medication adherence was associated with lower perceived stigma, higher self-rated severity of illness, age over 60 years, and absence of personality pathology. No other characteristics of treatment or illness were significantly related to medication adherence.
Perceived stigma associated with mental illness and individuals' views about the illness play an important role in adherence to treatment for depression. Clinicians' attention to psychological barriers early in treatment may improve medication adherence and ultimately affect the course of illness.

Download full-text


Available from: Deborah Perlick, Jun 08, 2015
  • Source
    • "The culmination of the stigma process is discrimination and diminished life chances for individuals labeled as mentally ill. The stigma of mental illness leads to demoralization, decreased social support, lowered self-esteem, reduced desire to seek help, and unemployment (Link, 1987;Link et al., 1989;Ritsher and Phelan, 2004;Sirey et al., 2001). Furthermore, mental illness labels lead to negative treatment in interactions, social rejection, and discrimination in several social sectors including employment, health care, and housing (Brand and Claiborn, 1976;Druss et al., 2000;Farina and Felner, 1973;Link et al., 1987Link et al., , 1999Page and Day, 1990;Phelan, 2005;Sibicky and Dovidio, 1986). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mental illness labels are accompanied by devaluation and discrimination. We extend research on reactions to mental illness by utilizing a field experiment (N = 635) to test effects of mental illness labels on labor market discrimination. This study involved sending fictitious applications to job listings, some applications indicating a history of mental illness and some indicating a history of physical injury. In line with research indicating that mental illness leads to stigma, we predicted fewer callbacks to candidates with mental illness. We also predicted relatively fewer callbacks for applicants with mental illness when the jobs involved a greater likelihood for interpersonal contact with the employer. Results showed significant discrimination against applicants with mental illness, but did not indicate an effect of potential proximity to the employer. This contributes a valuable finding in a natural setting to research on labor market discrimination towards people with mental illness.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2016
    • "Given that there is less interaction or oversight from older adults/parents, in general on Twitter, young Twitter users can feel free to openly communicate with friends and acquaintances about virtually anything, even topics as traditionally private as mental illness. Depression tends to be a stigmatized condition (Eisenberg, Downs, Golberstein, & Zivin, 2009) and many people consider the struggle of such symptoms to be " private matters " and/or choose not to seek treatment because they do not want to be labeled as a psychiatric patient (Bland, Newman, & Orn, 1997; Dew, Dunn, Bromet, & Schulberg, 1988; Sirey et al., 2001). Moreover, selfharm , defined as intentional self-poisoning or self-injury, irrespective of type of motive or the extent of suicidal intent, is a grave public health problem among young people (Hawton, Saunders, & O'Connor, 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examines depression-related chatter on Twitter to glean insight into social networking about mental health. We assessed themes of a random sample (n=2,000) of depression-related tweets (sent 4-11 to 5-4-14). Tweets were coded for expression of DSM-5 symptoms for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Supportive or helpful tweets about depression was the most common theme (n=787, 40%), closely followed by disclosing feelings of depression (n=625; 32%). Two-thirds of tweets revealed one or more symptoms for the diagnosis of MDD and/or communicated thoughts or ideas that were consistent with struggles with depression after accounting for tweets that mentioned depression trivially. Health professionals can use our findings to tailor and target prevention and awareness messages to those Twitter users in need.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2016 · Computers in Human Behavior
  • Source
    • "Given these stigma-related concerns, it is not surprising that past research has demonstrated that a diagnosis for a stigmatizing health condition results in increased incidence of depression and psychological distress (Butt, Paterson, & McGuinness, 2008), as well as preventive screening apprehension (Fortenberry et al., 2002). A diagnosis can also negatively affect an individual's physical health vis-à-vis nonadherence to behavioral and/or pharmaceutical management (Sirey et al., 2001). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Type 2 diabetes is a growing problem among Appalachian Kentucky residents. Several issues contribute to diabetes disparities in the region, including lack of access to health care and geographic isolation. Previous studies also indicate that social stigma may be associated with type 2 diabetes. We used 28 semistructured interviews to explore how stigma is socially constructed across health status (diagnosed/undiagnosed). Perceived severity of the disease is high, yet the etiology of diabetes is not well understood. Thus, onset is perceived to occur "out of the blue," and a positive diagnosis is perceived as having life-threatening consequences. Diagnosed participants, who had learned more about the disease's etiology, prevention, and management, expressed intrapersonal stigma. In interpersonal situations, the visible indicators of a diabetes diagnosis (i.e., physical weight, insulin injection), rather than diagnosis status, tended to evoke stigmatizing interactions. These findings form the foundation for our recommendations for prevention messages in the region.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · Health Communication
Show more